Re: Problems with LyX 1.5.1 on Ubuntu 7.10

2008-01-15 Thread George De Bruin

rgheck wrote:

Probably unrelated.

Can you create a new user and see if LyX works right for her?


Okay,

Interesting - now have it down to the root problem: window manager.  I 
normally use pekwm as my window manager.  However, when I set up the new 
user, it went to the system default: Xfce.  I then went back to my 
normal user, and switched back to Xfce, and it worked.


Sorry I didn't mention this earlier.  I honestly didn't think it was the 
cause of the issue...  Never had it get in the way of LyX before...


// George


LyX Qt under Gnome environment

2008-01-15 Thread Raymond Ouellette
I compiled LyX 1.5.3 for my Linux distro Ubuntu 7.10.

I'm a long time user of LyX. But since QT4 version of LyX, it is
impossible for me to select anything using my mouse in LyX. Even
selecting with the cursor, holding shift, etc, has erratic behavior.

The mouse select something, shade in blue, then diseapers without
selecting anything.

I checked in KDE 3.5.x and there is no problem.

So this behavior is Gnome specific. Someone else has this problem?

Raymond

p.s. If necessary, I can upload my deb package of LyX 1.5.3 for the ftp
site.

-- 

Édité et transmis avec des logiciels libres sous Linux !


Re: Problems with LyX 1.5.1 on Ubuntu 7.10

2008-01-15 Thread rgheck

George De Bruin wrote:

Ignacio García wrote:

What deb package are you trying?
I have downloaded and installed on Ubuntu 7.10 the dapper version
with no problems. I'm using it from october.

ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.5.2/lyx-1.5.2-1_dapper_i386.deb
  
I tried the package you mentioned, and it installed.  The package I 
had tried was the i386 package. Odd this one installs, but the other 
doesn't.  The scrolling is a lot better with this version.


More odd: I still have the same dialog problem.  This time I got the 
following message on the terminal: "PreferencesPolicy: No transition 
for input SMI_RESTORE from state INITIAL"



Probably unrelated.

Can you create a new user and see if LyX works right for her?

Richard



Re: Problems with LyX 1.5.1 on Ubuntu 7.10

2008-01-15 Thread George De Bruin

Ignacio García wrote:

What deb package are you trying?
I have downloaded and installed on Ubuntu 7.10 the dapper version
with no problems. I'm using it from october.

ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.5.2/lyx-1.5.2-1_dapper_i386.deb
  

Okay,

I tried the package you mentioned, and it installed.  The package I had 
tried was the i386 package. Odd this one installs, but the other 
doesn't.  The scrolling is a lot better with this version.


More odd: I still have the same dialog problem.  This time I got the 
following message on the terminal: "PreferencesPolicy: No transition for 
input SMI_RESTORE from state INITIAL"


But, I only got it one time.  However, in looking up the message, I see 
that it has occurred before, about a year ago: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg110524.html


I also tried re-installing the qt4 libraries to see if there was 
something wrong with the installation - but nothing has changed.


// George


Re: ERT with cupbook.cls

2008-01-15 Thread Holliday, Ian E
OK - I sorted it out. It was of course simply that I'd tried to put ERT into a 
non-standard environment - paragraph - having forgotten that 'standard' is what 
I should normally use, and paragraph is a level in the section hierarchy. There 
have been a couple of others I noticed lower down the list that have also got 
caught with this one.


Unable to set table column width

2008-01-15 Thread Adrian Peter
Hi,

 

I'm using Lyx 1.52 on Vista.  Every time I try to set a column width for a
table, the value keeps disappearing and I'm unable to fix the desired width.
Also, it will not let me change the default units to something else.  The
drop down list shows other unit but when I select one it stays on 'in'.  Can
anyone tell me what is going on?  Thank you for your help.


Adrian

 



Re: [OT] Best KDE-centric Distribution?

2008-01-15 Thread David Neeley
At the moment, I'm using Linux Mint, although there are a few nagging
problems but no apparent show-stoppers on my HP laptop.

However, I'm definitely looking forward to KDE4, now that it's out. From
what I've seen, it should permit some outstanding integration with much
reduced confusion from multiple libraries and such--as well as make easy use
of additional KDE/QT4 resources in many kinds of programs. I think about the
time that KDE4.1 is out--probably in six months or so as I understand
it--there'll be many additional improvements from the basic 4.0 level. One
outstanding advantage is smaller resource use, too, so it won't be such a
resource hog as the 3.5.x series has been.

I do think KDE is much better programmatically than Gnome, though, even
before the switch to the 4.0 level.

However, I'm going to continue trying various other distros--and this thread
has gotten me quite intrigued with a revisit to Slackware after many years
away. Thanks!

David

On Jan 15, 2008 3:04 PM, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
>  Georg Baum tried before to build a kde frontend to lyx (that shared lots
> of
> code with the qt frontend), that would live at the same time with the qt
> frontend like we had before an xforms frontend.
>
>  A frontend of lyx better integrated with kde seems a nice idea. :-)


Re: Please remove me from the list

2008-01-15 Thread christian . ridderstrom

On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Sourena Mohammadi wrote:


Please remove me from this list.
I do not know how to me removed.
--Sourena Mohammadi


You can remove yourself... the messages you get from this list contains 
the information you need.


/C

--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44   http://www.md.kth.se/~chr

Re: [OT] Best KDE-centric Distribution?

2008-01-15 Thread José Matos
On Monday 14 January 2008 17:46:02 Steve Litt wrote:
>
> IIRC the Mandriva 2007 I use defaults to KDE and has lots and lots of KDE
> programs (I'm writing this on kmail), but my hatred of KDE is so profound
> that my first step was to switch to IceWM, and my second step was to find
> non-KDE substitutes for as many KDE programs as I could.

  With all the due respect :-) but this hate seems a bit irrational. :-)

  André (out mathed - mathematical editor - guru) still uses fvwm with 16 
desktops open, at least according to a recent message. I met him before and I 
have witness this so it seems that you are in good company. :-)

> It's my fervent hope that LyX never becomes a KDE program. Qt is OK, but
> IMHO KDE programs have too many needless interactions with other programs
> (like dcop server, gimme a break), needlessly causing crashiness and other
> problems.

  dcop is no more in kde 4, long live dbus. :-)

  Georg Baum tried before to build a kde frontend to lyx (that shared lots of 
code with the qt frontend), that would live at the same time with the qt 
frontend like we had before an xforms frontend.

  A frontend of lyx better integrated with kde seems a nice idea. :-)

  I can understand though some of the frustration with kde 3, kde 4 shows a 
lot of promisses and good ideas. I have been working with it in rawhide (pre 
Fedora 9) and like it a lot while some of the ideas seems solid (no pun 
intended).

> SteveT
>
> Steve Litt
> Books written in LyX:
>   Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist
>   Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting
>   Troubleshooting: Just the Facts

-- 
José Abílio


Please remove me from the list

2008-01-15 Thread Sourena Mohammadi

Hi,
Please remove me from this list.
I do not know how to me removed.
--Sourena Mohammadi


Re: Lyx keyboard shortcuts on mac

2008-01-15 Thread Jens Noeckel


On Jan 14, 2008, at 8:57 AM, Bennett Helm wrote:


On Jan 14, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Daniel Lohmann wrote:


On 10.01.2008, at 02:33, Bennett Helm wrote:

Better yet, look at the mac-bind.pdf file that is included with  
the LyX/Mac distribution. Insert footnote is not defined there,  
but you can define it yourself by creating a file with the  
following:


\bind_file mac.bind

\bind "S-C-F" "footnote-insert"


While it is certainly an option to add lots of shortcuts to the  
bind-file, it is also kind of dissatisfying  that on Windows and  
Linux we implicitly have *all* menu commands available as  
shortcuts (by the Alt+underlined letter, underlined letter, ...  
keyboard navigation through menus), whereas on Mac the user has to  
assign about a hundred shortcuts manually to achieve the same  
usability. Moreover, the multi-key shortcuts are not visible in  
the menu. (The latter is not an as big problem, as LyX has this  
great feature to print the shortcut of the last executed command  
in the status bar.)


You can take a look at aqua.bind (in LyX.app/Contents/Resources/ 
bind). That will give access to the menus via the keyboard. Or you  
can use turn on Keyboard Navigation in System Preferences >  
Keyboard & Mouse > Keyboard Shortcuts.


I guess it is not LyX to blame here (and certainly not it's  
developers :-) ), but the Mac menu system in general or maybe  Qt  
for Mac. Nevertheless, I think it would be a good idea to offer  
Mac users the same level of comfort by adding *lots* of shortcuts  
to the standard mac.bind file and, maybe, looking for some other  
way to indicate multi-key shortcuts in the LyX menus.


Yes: it's a Qt/Mac issue. Is anyone else interested in having more  
standard shortcuts?


Bennett



Hi,
I think the way things are is OK in that one can customize the  
keybindings freely, and also leverage some of the existing bind  
files. What I do is to select a modified version of xemacs.bind as  
the default, but at the end of that file I load some other bind files  
as well, to get math and menu bindings.


The menus in LyX can be accessed by keyboard, using shortcuts that  
are defined in menus.bind (although I recall having to modify some  
things there too, because the Lfunc names were outdated in LyX  
1.5.3)... one thing that's bad about accessing the menus with the  
keyboard is that the drop-down lists open in a "floating" position,  
torn off from the menu bar. Fortunately, on the Mac you can also  
access the menu bar by the system-wide shortcut "Control-F2" (which  
you can in turn customize in the System Preferences).


Jens



Re: viewing the german UserGuide with pdflatex

2008-01-15 Thread Dominik Waßenhoven

Hartmut Haase schrieb am 15.01.2008:

Is there anyone except me who has problems with viewing the german UserGuide 
with pdflatex?. It happens for me with all versions after 1.5, and with 
lyx154svn and lyx16svn, too. If I copy the table, where the error happens, 
into a new document, everything is fine.


No problem here
 LyX 1.5.3, installed with Uwes installer
 Windows XP
 MiKTeX 2.6

Regards,
Dominik.-




RE: LyX install on Fedora

2008-01-15 Thread Milen Ivanov
Dear Oisin, 

Thank you, it surely helps!

Actually the first thing I tried was to find a .rpm for LyX 1.5.3 for
Fedora 8, but from another computer running XP (I used Google) as it
will take me few more days to connect the laptop to internet. I did find
some .rpm's but for LyX 1.4.. and Fedora 6, so I assumed that it is not
on yet. What can I say... rookie performance.  

When it comes to updating to LyX 1.6, I will use the package manager. 

Best regards,
Milen

-Original Message-
From: Oisin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 4:24 PM
To: Milen Ivanov
Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: LyX install on Fedora

On Jan 15, 2008 6:54 AM, Milen Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Just a note for Linux rookies like me who might want the latest
version
> of LyX.
>
>
>
> Unfortunately the recent discussion on Linux distributions came just
few
> days too late for me. I chose Fedora 8 (Gnome) for my laptop because

The results of that are now a bit out of date as Fedora 8 has the
latest Lyx (1.5.3), so as Neal Becker points out below all you need to
do is to install the latest available package.  The advantages of
using a package-based distro (whether it's rpm based (e.g. Fedora,
Mandriva, SuSE) or deb based (e.g. Debian, Ubuntu) is that
removing/upgrading the program (and all it's dependent parts) is much
cleaner and easier. It also allows you to benefit from the experience
of someone who has made it their specialty and expertise to figure out
exactly how the upstream source can be best integrated with the rest
of the distribution.

There is some excellent documentation available on software management
in Fedora here:

http://docs.fedoraproject.org/yum/en/

HTH,
Oisin Feeley


Re: error while installing lyx on mac

2008-01-15 Thread Bennett Helm

On Jan 15, 2008, at 9:53 AM, Biao Wu wrote:


Bennett, i followed your instructions. I got no error messages. thanks
for all the help. Biao


That's good. I still don't understand why the installer wasn't  
working for you, but since we haven't had other reports of troubles  
like this I won't worry too much. Thanks for your troubleshooting  
attempts.


Bennett


Re: [OT] Best KDE-centric Distribution?

2008-01-15 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 13:14:45 rgheck wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Or how long it takes to compile LyX... :-) [*]
> >
> > [*] Seriously, I'm probably interested in the specs and what compile
> > time you got when using e.g. two or three of the cores. But this is
> > maybe better suited for the devel list.
>
> Actually, I'm still a newbie when it comes to multi-core and don't even
> know how to enable compilation on multiple cores. It seems to use only
> one core at a time. If you want to tell me how to enable that, I'll tell
> you what times I'm getting. But I'll tell you, I can develop a lot
> faster than I could before, and do it while doing other things.

  make -j 4

$ man make
...
   -j [jobs], --jobs[=jobs]
Specifies  the number of jobs (commands) to run simultaneously.

> Richard

-- 
José Abílio


Re: error while installing lyx on mac

2008-01-15 Thread Biao Wu
On Jan 15, 2008 8:51 AM, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2008, at 7:30 PM, Biao Wu wrote:
>
> > Bennett, I created ~/Library/texmf/tex/latex. It did not change
> > anything. I got
> > the same error message. Biao
>
> I'm stumped. Try opening Terminal.app, and typing this:
>
> mkdir -p ~/Library/texmf/tex/latex/lyx
>
> cp /path/to/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/tex/* ~/Library/texmf/tex/
> latex/lyx/
>
> (where you should substitute the path to your LyX.app for "/path/to".
> In my case, keeping LyX.app in the Applications directory, I would type:
>
> cp /Applications/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/tex/* ~/Library/texmf/tex/
> latex/lyx/
>
> Then enter:
>
> texhash
>
> That will complete the last step of the installation manually. Let me
> know if you get any error messages when doing this. (You should see
> the same output from texhash as before.)
>
> Bennett
>
Bennett, i followed your instructions. I got no error messages. thanks
for all the help. Biao


viewing the german UserGuide with pdflatex

2008-01-15 Thread Hartmut Haase
Is there anyone except me who has problems with viewing the german UserGuide 
with pdflatex?. It happens for me with all versions after 1.5, and with 
lyx154svn and lyx16svn, too. If I copy the table, where the error happens, 
into a new document, everything is fine.
-- 
Viele Grüße,
Hartmut 

Hungerhilfe: http://www.thehungersite.com

Kampagne gegen den Ausverkauf der Deutschen Bahn:
http://www.bahn-fuer-alle.de

Das heutige Motto:
Wat den een sien Uhl is den annern sien Nachtigall.


Re: [Solution] environment split over several ERTs --> LaTeX warning "Extra }, or forgotten \endgroup."

2008-01-15 Thread Helge Hafting

Tobias Krause wrote:

Hi,

it took a while to figure out how to have environments split over 
several ERTs.


   [ERT] \begin{centering}[/ERT]
   what ever in normal LyX
   [ERT] \end{centering}[/ERT]

ended with the LaTeX warning "Extra }, or forgotten \endgroup."

For other who have the same problem: a simple % at the end of the 
first ERT solves this problem:


   [ERT] \begin{centering}%[/ERT]
   what ever in normal LyX
   [ERT] \end{centering}[/ERT]

Is this a bug or a feature? What exactly does the % at the end of the 
first ERT change?

Well, it comments out the line break that follows.
You can split stuff over as many ERTs as you like, but:
1. In this case, whatever goes inside must not cause brace imbalance,
   some lyx constructs may do that - especially if you change paragraph 
type

  or nesting depth.
  A sufficiently new LyX have view->source where you can check such things.
2. Pressing enter acutally do something, so you will sometimes have to
   write this as:
[ERT] \begin{centering}[/ERT]whatever [ERT] \end{centering}[/ERT]

Again, use view->source or export->tex to see what happens.
Helge Hafting



Re: LyX install on Fedora

2008-01-15 Thread rgheck

Oisin wrote:

On Jan 15, 2008 6:54 AM, Milen Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  

Dear All,



Just a note for Linux rookies like me who might want the latest version
of LyX.



Unfortunately the recent discussion on Linux distributions came just few
days too late for me. I chose Fedora 8 (Gnome) for my laptop because



The results of that are now a bit out of date as Fedora 8 has the
latest Lyx (1.5.3), [...]

I took it he meant he wanted to try 1.6.svn

rh



Re: [OT] Best KDE-centric Distribution?

2008-01-15 Thread Bob Lounsbury
On Jan 14, 2008 8:56 PM, rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob Lounsbury wrote:
> > On Jan 14, 2008 10:18 AM, rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but the
> >> second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get to me, so I'm
> >> thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
> >> for me. Gentoo would be an option, but then I'm not sure I want to be
> >> quite that bleeding-edge. So, the question: What?
> >>
> >> Richard
> >>
> >
> > My vote is Slackware. [snip]
> Thanks. I'd not even have thought of Slackware, but it may well be the
> right distro for me. The "learning about Linux" part is what attracts me
> to Gentoo---I don't think I'm quite ready for Linux from Scratch---but
> having to compile dang near everything...I'm not sure I want to go that
> route.
>
> rh

Just to clarify, I hope you're not thinking Slackware is similar to
Linux from Scratch because it's not. Slackware is a fully compiled
distro, just install it, choose kde, and go to work (took me 20min to
install it). I also wanted to point out that some will complain that
Slackware does not track dependencies. The great thing about this is
that in general there aren't additional dependencies needed in
Slackware like in other distros. As an example, you said you regularly
compile Qt4 yourself to install LyX 1.6.svn, I just installed
Aiksaurus, Qt4-4.3.3, and LyX 1.5.3 without needing any "additional"
dependencies. Most of the libraries are already built into Slackware.

Good luck with the search.
/Bob


Re: LyX install on Fedora

2008-01-15 Thread Oisin
On Jan 15, 2008 6:54 AM, Milen Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Just a note for Linux rookies like me who might want the latest version
> of LyX.
>
>
>
> Unfortunately the recent discussion on Linux distributions came just few
> days too late for me. I chose Fedora 8 (Gnome) for my laptop because

The results of that are now a bit out of date as Fedora 8 has the
latest Lyx (1.5.3), so as Neal Becker points out below all you need to
do is to install the latest available package.  The advantages of
using a package-based distro (whether it's rpm based (e.g. Fedora,
Mandriva, SuSE) or deb based (e.g. Debian, Ubuntu) is that
removing/upgrading the program (and all it's dependent parts) is much
cleaner and easier. It also allows you to benefit from the experience
of someone who has made it their specialty and expertise to figure out
exactly how the upstream source can be best integrated with the rest
of the distribution.

There is some excellent documentation available on software management
in Fedora here:

http://docs.fedoraproject.org/yum/en/

HTH,
Oisin Feeley


Re: [OT] Best KDE-centric Distribution?

2008-01-15 Thread rgheck

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Or how long it takes to compile LyX... :-) [*]

[*] Seriously, I'm probably interested in the specs and what compile 
time you got when using e.g. two or three of the cores. But this is 
maybe better suited for the devel list.


Actually, I'm still a newbie when it comes to multi-core and don't even 
know how to enable compilation on multiple cores. It seems to use only 
one core at a time. If you want to tell me how to enable that, I'll tell 
you what times I'm getting. But I'll tell you, I can develop a lot 
faster than I could before, and do it while doing other things.


Richard




Re: LyX install on Fedora

2008-01-15 Thread rgheck

Milen Ivanov wrote:

Unfortunately the recent discussion on Linux distributions came just few
days too late for me. I chose Fedora 8 (Gnome) for my laptop because
Ubuntu setup program could not find its way around the chipset, Debian
appears LARGE (4 DVDs! to have no worry) and no-one I know is on SuSe.

  
For what it's worth, I still love Fedora. I think it strikes a nice 
balance between having the latest software and being fairly stable. You 
just do need to make sure to keep it upgraded, and to upgrade versions 
regularly, too, since they have a fairly short life-cycle. I'm just 
frustrated by certain bits related to KDE. If you're going to use Gnome, 
I think Fedora will be fine, and I can see myself staying with it, even 
with the frustrations.

Nevertheless, after compiling and installing the latest version of Qt4,
the "from source" installation of LyX is a piece of cake.

  
Generally so, yes. I regularly compile LyX 1.6.svn for development 
purposes just using the Qt packages from Fedora.

The only problem was that xdvi seems to be missing from the
distribution, or at least not recognizable. Just installing it solves
the problem. (The one I got has an interface from the good old days, but
in the context of LyX does its job just fine).

  

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qf `which xdvi`
tetex-xdvi-3.0-44.3.fc8
You can also install kdvi, in the kdegraphics package. It's a nice 
viewer. Fast, and it supports things like thumbnails and links.

From what I can see so far, LyX on Linux is clearly faster than LyX on
Windows. The latter however is somehow better configured when using the
alternative installer.
  
If there are other respects in which this is so, other than the failure 
to find xdvi, then do let us know. DVI is a special case, though. The 
only two DVI viewers listed in the configure script are xdvi and kdvi. 
Evince, for example, won't handle it.


Richard



Re: LyX install on Fedora

2008-01-15 Thread Neal Becker
Uh, did you consider 'yum install lyx'?  You don't need to build anything
for lyx on F8.



LyX install on Fedora

2008-01-15 Thread Milen Ivanov
Dear All,

 

Just a note for Linux rookies like me who might want the latest version
of LyX.

 

Unfortunately the recent discussion on Linux distributions came just few
days too late for me. I chose Fedora 8 (Gnome) for my laptop because
Ubuntu setup program could not find its way around the chipset, Debian
appears LARGE (4 DVDs! to have no worry) and no-one I know is on SuSe.

 

Nevertheless, after compiling and installing the latest version of Qt4,
the "from source" installation of LyX is a piece of cake.

 

The only problem was that xdvi seems to be missing from the
distribution, or at least not recognizable. Just installing it solves
the problem. (The one I got has an interface from the good old days, but
in the context of LyX does its job just fine).

 

>From what I can see so far, LyX on Linux is clearly faster than LyX on
Windows. The latter however is somehow better configured when using the
alternative installer.

 

Best regards,

Milen



Re: [OT] Best KDE-centric Distribution?

2008-01-15 Thread Charles de Miramon
rgheck wrote:

> Debian Etch.
>>
>> [snip]
> Thanks for the suggestion. I've thought about Debian, and it has a great
> reputation for stability. That said, while I don't want to be absolutely
> bleeding edge, I do like to be near it, and Debian at least has a
> reputation for being, well, stable. Just looking at the packages, it
> looks like Lyx 1.4.3 is the most recent in etch. It looks as if lenny
> has 1.5.2, but even that's out of date, and, as you say, that's not yet
> ready. So, well, I'm still looking.
> 
> Richard

Debian unstable (that I use) has 1.5.3. Unstable is not so unstable because
most big transformations happens in "experimental". The pro of Debian
unstable is :
- extensive set of packages
- good reliable command line package management and a lot of scripts to
create your own packages
- once you install it, you just upgrade. No need to spend a week-end every 6
months , reinstalling a new distribution
- Good KDE packages

The cons :
- The Debian community is sometimes obnoxious
- Website, wiki, information, help is beyond Ubuntu, Mandriva, etc. quality.
Finding you way is complex
- The installer is better than it was but still rather primitive
- You will have to tinker for configuration 

Cheers,
Charles
-- 
http://www.kde-france.org



Re: Problems with LyX 1.5.1 on Ubuntu 7.10

2008-01-15 Thread Ignacio García
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008, George De Bruin wrote:
>> I tried grabbing the .deb for 1.5.2 from the lyx.org site, but couldn't get
>> it to install.  GDebi told me that it wasn't a valid package.

>> Any hints or clues?

What deb package are you trying?
I have downloaded and installed on Ubuntu 7.10 the dapper version
with no problems. I'm using it from october.

ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.5.2/lyx-1.5.2-1_dapper_i386.deb

Regards
Ignacio


Jumps in broad table

2008-01-15 Thread Hellmut Weber

Hi,
I'm using 1.5.3 as of Dec 17, 2007 with documents of the kind attached.
It contains a table broader than the screen.

Navigating / Editing this table is sometimes surprising, The cursor 
jumps, selecting something is realized in jumps to the wrong side and 
then returning and evnetually producing the correct selection.


To make it clear: Everything I need so far works well, it's only the 
editing behaviour which is surprising.


BTW What do I have to do to activate the use of the booktabs package for 
my table?


Thanks for your effort put into LyX ;-)
Keep on with your work on this great program


Cheers

Hellmut

--
Dr. Hellmut Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Degenfeldstraße 2 tel   +49-89-3081172
D-80803 München-Schwabing mobil +49-172-8450321
please: No DOCs, no PPTs. why: tinyurl.com/cbgq
#LyX 1.5.3 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 276
\begin_document
\begin_header
\textclass scrartcl
\language ngerman
\inputencoding latin1
\font_roman default
\font_sans default
\font_typewriter default
\font_default_family default
\font_sc false
\font_osf false
\font_sf_scale 100
\font_tt_scale 100
\graphics default
\paperfontsize default
\spacing single
\papersize default
\use_geometry false
\use_amsmath 1
\use_esint 0
\cite_engine basic
\use_bibtopic false
\paperorientation portrait
\secnumdepth 0
\tocdepth 3
\paragraph_separation indent
\defskip medskip
\quotes_language english
\papercolumns 1
\papersides 1
\paperpagestyle default
\bullet 0 2 8 -1
\bullet 1 2 34 -1
\tracking_changes false
\output_changes false
\author "" 
\author "" 
\end_header

\begin_body

\begin_layout Standard
In der nebenstehenden Tabelle ist alle Information zusammen gestellt, die
 für die Orgaisation der Veranstaltung von Bedeutung sein könnte.
\newline
\InsetSpace ~

\begin_inset ERT
status collapsed

\begin_layout Standard


\backslash
bigskip 
\end_layout

\end_inset

 
\begin_inset ERT
status collapsed

\begin_layout Standard

{
\backslash
footnotesize 
\end_layout

\end_inset


\end_layout

\begin_layout Standard
\begin_inset Tabular









\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\series bold
Here is the place for info about the customer
\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset




\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\series bold
Here goes the event's name
\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset




\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset




\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\series bold
\emph on
Veranstaltungs-Info
\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard
Stand: 
\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset




\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\emph on
Auftraggeber
\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard
Hans Georg Friedrich
\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset




\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\emph on
Ansprechpartner
\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard
dito
\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset




\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\emph on
Vermittler
\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard
Stephan Maier
\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset




\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_inset Text

\begin_layout Standard

\end_layout

\end_inset


\begin_ins

ERT with cupbook.cls

2008-01-15 Thread Holliday, Ian E
Hi Lyx people

I am a new user and am struggling to implement features of the Cambridge 
university press latex class cupbook.cls that I need to use. This includes 
alternative \authorindex and \subjectindex commands, and also \endnote. I've 
made a layout that invokes the cls OK, but having messed around with it for 
ages and read the manual about using layouts and I'm not sure I can use layouts 
for simple commands, so have now attempted to apply the endnote command in a 
simple file with latex and with ERT in lyx.

Here is my Latex file that works fine:

\documentclass{cupbook}

\begin{document}

\title{Test CUPBOOK}

\section{Introduction}
Here is the text of your introduction \endnote{Fist para.}.



\section{Conclusion}
Write your conclusion here.

\theendnotes
\end{document}

---

I then made a similar file in Lyx. Here is the latex preview.

% Preview source code
%% LyX 1.5.3 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
%% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.
\makeatletter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"C:/Documents and Settings/hollidie/Desktop/\string"/}}
\makeatother
\documentclass[oneside,english]{cupbook}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[latin9]{inputenc}
\setcounter{secnumdepth}{3}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\makeatletter
\usepackage{babel}
\makeatother
\begin{document}
\title{Here is the title.}
\maketitle
\chapter{The first chapter.}
\paragraph{First things first.}
\paragraph{Here is a section on stuff. Stuff is OK to use for things like this.
Yak Yak \endnote{Stuff}.}
\theendnotes
\end{document}

--

But this will not compile to a dvi OK in LyX.  The error log claims there is a 
'}' missing, but I can't spot anything wrong (and even if I could I don't know 
how I'd fix it!):

\theendnotes
I've run across a `}' that doesn't seem to match anything.
For example, `\def\a#1{...}' and `\a}' would produce
this error. If you simply proceed now, the `\par' that
I've just inserted will cause me to report a runaway
argument that might be the root of the problem. But if
your `}' was spurious, just type `2' and it will go away.

Any ideas?

Thanks

Ian



Re: Problems with LyX 1.5.1 on Ubuntu 7.10

2008-01-15 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 14 Jan 2008, George De Bruin wrote:
> rgheck wrote:
>>   
>> Try 1.5.3. Some work has been done on scrolling, and a LOT more is to  
>> come in 1.6.
> I would, but I don't see a .deb out there for it.  (Either in the Ubuntu  
> repos, or on ftp.lyx.org)  And I really don't want to compile from the  
> source... I've tried to install the 1.5.2 .deb, but keep getting the  
> message:

[snip] 

There is a .deb available in Debian Sid which I'm using without problems
on native Debian. I don't know if it is possible or desirable to use
such packages on Ubuntu, but if it is, it might work for you.



-- 
Anthony Campbell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Microsoft-free zone - Using Linux Gnu-Debian
http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews, 
on-line books and sceptical articles)