Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Manveru
2009/12/12 Diego Queiroz queiroz.di...@gmail.com:
 Hello.

 Thanks for your reply.

 I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows up
 an annoying console window when it opens. I really dislikes it, haha.

 In general, I think the standalone installer is more clean. This is why I
 prefer it. :-)


With all respect to your contribution Uwe, this is my preference too :-)

-- 
Manveru
jabber: manv...@manveru.pl
 gg: 1624001
   http://www.manveru.pl


Re: launching LyX 1.6.5

2009-12-12 Thread E. Kaplan

Dear Uwe,
Thanks for your help.

  1. I got the error when I was in the C:\program files\Lyx 1.6.5\bin
 directory.
  2. Lyx.exe resides in that same directory
  3. As far as I know, no other Lyx is installed on either one of the
 two XP systems where the alitnstaller fails (I removed Lyx before
 the installation using the Windows Add or Remove Programs tool)
  4. I tried to redirect the output of the cmd window to a file, but
 even though the file opens, nothing is ever written to it, so I
 cannot send you the log-- it is empty.  The Task manager shows the
 Lyxlauncher to be running, but it seems to be doing nothing.
  5. Miktex was originally installed on my machine and worked without
 any problems (using Lyx, Winedt, etc.)  I removed and reinstalled
 it when the altinstaller failed. 
  6. The path to latex.exe is: c:\program files\miktex 2.8\miktex\bin


EK


Ehud Kaplan, Ph.D.
Jules and Doris Stein /Research to Prevent Blindness/ Professor
*The laboratory of Visual  Computational Neuroscience*
Depts. of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Chemical  Structural Biology
The Mount Sinai School of Medicine
One Gustave Levy Place
New York, NY, 10029



Uwe Stöhr wrote:

EK schrieb:


It still did /*not */work.  The response from running:
lyx -dbg 3 was: Lyx is not recognized as an internal or external 
command.. etc.


When calling
lyx -dbg 3
from the console, are you already in the folder where the lyx.exe file 
resides?
Lyx is not recognized as an internal or external command is the 
error message when you e.g. called lyx from C:\hello while lyx.exe is 
e.g. in C:\Programs\LyX 1.6.4
Can you please try it again and send me the whole log you get in the 
console when calling LyX?


Where does the lyx.exe reside?

Some general questions: Are you sure that no other LyX version is 
installed on your system? Where is MiKTeX 2.8 installed (what is the 
path to the latex.exe)?


regards Uwe


Font sizes for the menu

2009-12-12 Thread Hartmut Haase
Hi,
I asked this already some time ago but I lost the answer:

The font size of the menu bar (File Edit View ...) is crontrolled by some 
gnome-program (?). Can someone tell me which one?
-- 
Viele Grüße,
Hartmut Haase

Hungerhilfe: http://www.thehungersite.com

Ohne Zensur suchen:
http://suche.amnesty-bergedorf.de/

Das heutige Motto:
Das Leben ist zu kostbar, um es dem Schicksal zu überlassen. (Deus X. Machina)


Re: Font sizes for the menu

2009-12-12 Thread Liviu Andronic
On 12/12/09, Hartmut Haase hha4...@web.de wrote:
  The font size of the menu bar (File Edit View ...) is crontrolled by some
  gnome-program (?). Can someone tell me which one?

No, this QT toolkit. Use qtconfig-qt4 (on Linux).
Liviu


OT: Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Florian Rubach

Am 12.12.2009 09:00, schrieb Manveru:

2009/12/12 Diego Queirozqueiroz.di...@gmail.com:
   

Hello.

Thanks for your reply.

I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows up
an annoying console window when it opens. I really dislikes it, haha.

In general, I think the standalone installer is more clean. This is why I
prefer it. :-)

 

With all respect to your contribution Uwe, this is my preference too :-)
   


I vote for the alt-installer ;)


Re: OT: Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
I have recently adopted the AltInstaller and I really like the upgrade
function and everything you need is in dimension of the complete
version. I first do a complete Miktex install or update, then the
upgrade through the AltInstaller and it works like a charm, even very
quick. I find the console window slightly annoying, but not enough to
counter-weight the advantages of the bundle. So, one vote for the alt
installer here too.

Thanks again Uwe for this public service!

Regards,

Murat

2009/12/12 Florian Rubach florian.rub...@gmx.de:
 Am 12.12.2009 09:00, schrieb Manveru:

 2009/12/12 Diego Queirozqueiroz.di...@gmail.com:


 Hello.

 Thanks for your reply.

 I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows
 up
 an annoying console window when it opens. I really dislikes it, haha.

 In general, I think the standalone installer is more clean. This is why
 I
 prefer it. :-)



 With all respect to your contribution Uwe, this is my preference too :-)


 I vote for the alt-installer ;)




-- 
Prof. Murat Yildizoglu
Université Paul Cézanne (Aix-Marseille 3)
GREQAM (UMR CNRS 6579)
Centre de la Vieille Charité
2, rue de la Charité
13236 Marseille cedex 02

Bureau 320
Tel : +33 4 91 14 07 27 (standard)
Tel : +33 4 91 14 07 70 (secrétariat)
Tel : +33 4 91 14 07 47 (bureau)
Fax : +33 4 91 90 02 27

e-mail: murat.yildizo...@univ-cezanne.fr
www : http://www.vcharite.univ-mrs.fr/PP/yildi/index.html
http://www.twitter.com/yildizoglu
__


GNUPLOT in Lyx? = How to allow Latex to call external programs?

2009-12-12 Thread peter kint
Hi,
I'm trying to gete PGF/Tikz compiled in Lyx for my mathematical illustrations.
For some functions, Latex must call external functions like GNUPLOT.

The solution is described below:

% PGF/Tikz doesn't support the following mathematical functions:
% tan, cosh, acosh, sinh, asinh, tanh, atanh
% Plotting will be done using GNUPLOT
% GNUPLOT must be installed and you must allow Latex to call external programs 
by
% Adding the following option to your compiler
% shell-escapeORenable-write18 
% Example: pdflatex --shell-escape file.tex 

How do I do this? How do I add this option to my compiler?

Thx for reading.
Peter



Re: eLyXer status update

2009-12-12 Thread Luke Venediger
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.comwrote:

 On 12/11/09, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl
 wrote:
  It works with the www prefix, but it is the skeptics that should read
   sceptics. (ok enough advertisements now ;-))
 
 As far as wordnet is concerned, both are accepted. :) It's probably
 another British vs American English.
 Liviu

 WordNet (r) 3.0 (2006) (wn)
 skeptic
n 1: someone who habitually doubts accepted beliefs [syn:
 skeptic, sceptic, doubter]


Hehe thanks Guys,

I'll have to register both domains to solve this one :)

Cheers,
Luke


Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Diego Queiroz wrote:
 Someone knoes when Windows binaries for Lyx 1.6.5 will be available?

It's available now.

Jürgen


Re: Lyx + gnuplot epslatex

2009-12-12 Thread peter kint
Jonathan Brandmeyer jbrandme...@... writes:

 
() 
 Since the latex produced by lyx only uses relative path names, I don't
 think that the error is in Lyx - it is in some program distributed with
 texlive.
 
 Thanks for the help.
 
 -Jonathan

Hi,
I'm not a Latex/lyx expert but I have the same kind of problems with
GNUPLOT in Lyx as you have.

I've been searching for a solution for centuries, and for me it boils
down to this:
% WARNING
% PGF/Tikz doesn't support the following mathematical functions:
% tan, cosh, acosh, sinh, asinh, tanh, atanh
% Plotting will be done using GNUPLOT
% GNUPLOT must be installed and you must allow Latex to call external
% programs  by
% Adding the following option to your compiler
% shell-escapeORenable-write18
% Example: pdflatex --shell-escape file.tex 

Maybe this is some help to you.
My question to you is: How do you add such a command to your compiler?
(I wouldn't know where to start, I'm only using Linux for 3 months now)
Peter  






Re: Lyx + gnuplot epslatex

2009-12-12 Thread peter kint
Jonathan Brandmeyer jbrandme...@... writes:

 
 I am having difficulty using Gnuplot's epslatex output in conjunction
 with Lyx. Gnuplot itself is capable of separately providing EPS graphics
 as well as text and labels as Tex code. Strictly speaking, I'm using
 Octave as a front-end to Gnuplot, but that shouldn't matter.
 


Hi,
I'm not a Latex/lyx expert but I have the same kind of problems with
GNUPLOT in Lyx as you have.

I've been searching for a solution for centuries, and for me it boils
down to this:

% WARNING
% PGF/Tikz doesn't support the following mathematical functions:
% tan, cosh, acosh, sinh, asinh, tanh, atanh
% Plotting will be done using GNUPLOT
% GNUPLOT must be installed and you must allow Latex to call external
% programs  by
% Adding the following option to your compiler
% shell-escapeORenable-write18
% Example: pdflatex --shell-escape file.tex 

Maybe this is some help to you.
My question to you is: How do you add such a command to your compiler?
(I wouldn't know where to start, I'm only using Linux for 3 months now)
Peter



Re: Lyx + gnuplot epslatex

2009-12-12 Thread Paul A. Rubin

peter kint wrote:


% WARNING
% PGF/Tikz doesn't support the following mathematical functions:
% tan, cosh, acosh, sinh, asinh, tanh, atanh
% Plotting will be done using GNUPLOT
% GNUPLOT must be installed and you must allow Latex to call external
% programs  by
% Adding the following option to your compiler
% shell-escapeORenable-write18
% Example: pdflatex --shell-escape file.tex 


Maybe this is some help to you.
My question to you is: How do you add such a command to your compiler?
(I wouldn't know where to start, I'm only using Linux for 3 months now)


(Disclaimer:  I have not tried this myself, since I don't use gnuplot.)

First, you obviously need to have gnuplot installed and working.

In LyX, go to Tools  Preferences  File Handling  Converters and 
select (highlight) the LaTeX (pdflatex) - PDF (pdflatex) converter. 
In the Converter: entry, change pdflatex $$i to pdflatex 
--shell-escape $$i and save it.  See if that helps.


If it does, you might consider a fancier solution.  You could go to 
Tools  Preferences  File Handling  File formats and create a new 
format (let's call it PDF (with plots)), then back to ...  Converters 
and create a LaTeX (pdflatex) - PDF (with plots) converter using the 
converter syntax above (and return the first converter to its original 
syntax).  You would then use View  PDF (with plots) rather than View 
 PDF (pdflatex) to view files with gnuplots in them (and similarly 
with file export). The reason for doing this would be security -- it 
would allow shell escapes only for documents where you knew you needed 
them. FWIW, I think the low security approach is pretty safe unless you 
have a habit of including raw LaTeX files from unverified sources in 
your documents.


/Paul



Re: launching LyX 1.6.5

2009-12-12 Thread E. Kaplan
Good news-- I saw Uwe's note that the standard installer for 1.6.5 for 
Windows is now finally available.  So I uninstalled Lyx once again, and 
using the standard installer was able to install and run Lyx on both 
Windows XP machines, on which the altinstaller was giving me such a hard 
time.
I now have Lyx working again on both machines, and all is well.  What 
is/was the source of the problem with the altinstaller might be a 
subject for further research, but for now I have a working system again.

EK



Uwe Stöhr wrote:

EK schrieb:


It still did /*not */work.  The response from running:
lyx -dbg 3 was: Lyx is not recognized as an internal or external 
command.. etc.


When calling
lyx -dbg 3
from the console, are you already in the folder where the lyx.exe file 
resides?
Lyx is not recognized as an internal or external command is the 
error message when you e.g. called lyx from C:\hello while lyx.exe is 
e.g. in C:\Programs\LyX 1.6.4
Can you please try it again and send me the whole log you get in the 
console when calling LyX?


Where does the lyx.exe reside?

Some general questions: Are you sure that no other LyX version is 
installed on your system? Where is MiKTeX 2.8 installed (what is the 
path to the latex.exe)?


regards Uwe


Re: Lyx + gnuplot epslatex

2009-12-12 Thread peter kint
Paul A. Rubin ru...@... writes:


 (Disclaimer:  I have not tried this myself, since I don't use gnuplot.)
 
 First, you obviously need to have gnuplot installed and working.
 
 In LyX, go to Tools  Preferences  File Handling  Converters and 

 /Paul
 
Hi Paul,
Your first suggestion did not work.
At compiling he gives an:which he did not give before:

 File does not exist:
 /tmp/lyx_tmpdir.T15846/lyx_tmpbuf2/ex_fys_5aso_2u_kerst.pdf
   (ex_fys_5aso_2u_kerst is the name of my file)

But my feeling is you are on the right track...

The problem now is that I cant compile any lyx-file anymore :-)
So , for the moment I'll try to get back to my previous Lyx-configuration.
Thanks for helping, you made me feel as if I'm 'pretty close'
Peter 





Distributing LYX and Myxtek

2009-12-12 Thread Philip
Hi Is there a way to distribute Lyx and Myxtek using group policy (Windows 
Server 2003)?



Re: launching LyX 1.6.5

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr

E. Kaplan schrieb:


  4. I tried to redirect the output of the cmd window to a file,


Instead of this, right-click into the console window and choose highlight. Then highlight the 
whole content of the window and copy it to a text file.


Currently I haven't any clue why it doesn't work for you -- I need the logfile.
As really nothing helps:

- uninstall LyX _completely_
- uninstall MiKTeX _completely_
- restart your PC
- log in as Admin and search the registry to assure that no leftovers are there. If you find 
something about lyx or miktex remove these registry keys.

- restart your PC
- install MiKTeX 2.8 manually (basic installer from www.miktex.org)
- install LyX 1.6.4! (not 1.6.5) using the small version of the alternative LyX 
installer

Does it then work?

regards Uwe


Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Diego Queiroz schrieb:


I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows up
an annoying console window when it opens.


Really? This should only be visible for a few milliseconds. Only at the first start after an 
installation the console Windows is shown to indicate the current installation status of LaTeX-packages.



In general, I think the standalone installer is more clean. This is why I
prefer it. :-)


They do basically the same (also the hiding of the console window), the 
differences are listed here:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyXWinInstaller#detailed-comparison

regards Uwe


Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Manveru schrieb:


In general, I think the standalone installer is more clean. This is why I
prefer it. :-)


With all respect to your contribution Uwe, this is my preference too :-)


Why exactly? How can I improve a product without clear statements?

regards Uwe


Re: OT: Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Murat Yildizoglu schrieb:


I find the console window slightly annoying,


Me too but I don't get a console Window. Not on Win2000, WinXP, WinVista, Win7. Also not on 64bit 
systems, and also not with an English, German, or Japanese Windows.


Do you always get this Window, also when double-clicking on the file 
lyxLauncher.exe?

regards Uwe


Re: Distributing LYX and Myxtek

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Philip schrieb:

Hi Is there a way to distribute Lyx and Myxtek using group policy (Windows 
Server 2003)?


I don't know if this is possible because I don't have a Windows server system and never worked with 
group policies. What works is when you install it as admin, choosing to install for all users on the 
system.
You can install MiKTeX separately. Look at its homepage to find out if it provides group policy 
support: http://www.miktex.org


regards Uwe


Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
I can see two console windows opening each time I launch Lyx using the  
bat file that has been installed by the alternative installer. They  
disappear very quickly (I do not have time to read their contents).

Murat

--
Murat Yildizoglu
murat.yildizo...@univ-cezanne.fr

Le 12 déc. 2009 à 21:49, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de a écrit :


Diego Queiroz schrieb:

I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer  
shows up

an annoying console window when it opens.


Really? This should only be visible for a few milliseconds. Only at  
the first start after an installation the console Windows is shown  
to indicate the current installation status of LaTeX-packages.


In general, I think the standalone installer is more clean. This  
is why I

prefer it. :-)


They do basically the same (also the hiding of the console window),  
the differences are listed here:

http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyXWinInstaller#detailed-comparison

regards Uwe


Re: Change order of bibliography entries

2009-12-12 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-12-11, Matthias Bußjäger wrote:

 I want to reference a standard with 10 parts.
...
 What I want to do is to change the order of the list of literature at 
 the end of my document. It seems that bibtex or lyx/latex decides this 
 order based on the name of the author.
 Is it possible to have effect on this order in another way, than to 
 change this name? (I don't really like the 01, 02  to get the right 
 order ;) )

AFAIK, this is possible with some special sort-key in the bibtex file.
This is described somewhere in the documentation that comes with bibtex.

Günter



Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Murat Yildizoglu schrieb:

I can see two console windows opening each time I launch Lyx using the 
bat file that has been installed by the alternative installer. They 
disappear very quickly (I do not have time to read their contents).


This is how it should be.
LyX is programmed in a way that a console is always started. My and also the standard installer 
hides it immediately. That you can see the console for a few milliseconds is normal. The time 
depends on the speed of your system.

So I don't understand your concerns.

regards Uwe


Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Manveru
2009/12/12 Diego Queiroz queiroz.di...@gmail.com:
 Hello.

 Thanks for your reply.

 I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows up
 an annoying console window when it opens. I really dislikes it, haha.

 In general, I think the standalone installer is more clean. This is why I
 prefer it. :-)


With all respect to your contribution Uwe, this is my preference too :-)

-- 
Manveru
jabber: manv...@manveru.pl
 gg: 1624001
   http://www.manveru.pl


Re: launching LyX 1.6.5

2009-12-12 Thread E. Kaplan

Dear Uwe,
Thanks for your help.

  1. I got the error when I was in the C:\program files\Lyx 1.6.5\bin
 directory.
  2. Lyx.exe resides in that same directory
  3. As far as I know, no other Lyx is installed on either one of the
 two XP systems where the alitnstaller fails (I removed Lyx before
 the installation using the Windows Add or Remove Programs tool)
  4. I tried to redirect the output of the cmd window to a file, but
 even though the file opens, nothing is ever written to it, so I
 cannot send you the log-- it is empty.  The Task manager shows the
 Lyxlauncher to be running, but it seems to be doing nothing.
  5. Miktex was originally installed on my machine and worked without
 any problems (using Lyx, Winedt, etc.)  I removed and reinstalled
 it when the altinstaller failed. 
  6. The path to latex.exe is: c:\program files\miktex 2.8\miktex\bin


EK


Ehud Kaplan, Ph.D.
Jules and Doris Stein /Research to Prevent Blindness/ Professor
*The laboratory of Visual  Computational Neuroscience*
Depts. of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Chemical  Structural Biology
The Mount Sinai School of Medicine
One Gustave Levy Place
New York, NY, 10029



Uwe Stöhr wrote:

EK schrieb:


It still did /*not */work.  The response from running:
lyx -dbg 3 was: Lyx is not recognized as an internal or external 
command.. etc.


When calling
lyx -dbg 3
from the console, are you already in the folder where the lyx.exe file 
resides?
Lyx is not recognized as an internal or external command is the 
error message when you e.g. called lyx from C:\hello while lyx.exe is 
e.g. in C:\Programs\LyX 1.6.4
Can you please try it again and send me the whole log you get in the 
console when calling LyX?


Where does the lyx.exe reside?

Some general questions: Are you sure that no other LyX version is 
installed on your system? Where is MiKTeX 2.8 installed (what is the 
path to the latex.exe)?


regards Uwe


Font sizes for the menu

2009-12-12 Thread Hartmut Haase
Hi,
I asked this already some time ago but I lost the answer:

The font size of the menu bar (File Edit View ...) is crontrolled by some 
gnome-program (?). Can someone tell me which one?
-- 
Viele Grüße,
Hartmut Haase

Hungerhilfe: http://www.thehungersite.com

Ohne Zensur suchen:
http://suche.amnesty-bergedorf.de/

Das heutige Motto:
Das Leben ist zu kostbar, um es dem Schicksal zu überlassen. (Deus X. Machina)


Re: Font sizes for the menu

2009-12-12 Thread Liviu Andronic
On 12/12/09, Hartmut Haase hha4...@web.de wrote:
  The font size of the menu bar (File Edit View ...) is crontrolled by some
  gnome-program (?). Can someone tell me which one?

No, this QT toolkit. Use qtconfig-qt4 (on Linux).
Liviu


OT: Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Florian Rubach

Am 12.12.2009 09:00, schrieb Manveru:

2009/12/12 Diego Queirozqueiroz.di...@gmail.com:
   

Hello.

Thanks for your reply.

I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows up
an annoying console window when it opens. I really dislikes it, haha.

In general, I think the standalone installer is more clean. This is why I
prefer it. :-)

 

With all respect to your contribution Uwe, this is my preference too :-)
   


I vote for the alt-installer ;)


Re: OT: Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
I have recently adopted the AltInstaller and I really like the upgrade
function and everything you need is in dimension of the complete
version. I first do a complete Miktex install or update, then the
upgrade through the AltInstaller and it works like a charm, even very
quick. I find the console window slightly annoying, but not enough to
counter-weight the advantages of the bundle. So, one vote for the alt
installer here too.

Thanks again Uwe for this public service!

Regards,

Murat

2009/12/12 Florian Rubach florian.rub...@gmx.de:
 Am 12.12.2009 09:00, schrieb Manveru:

 2009/12/12 Diego Queirozqueiroz.di...@gmail.com:


 Hello.

 Thanks for your reply.

 I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows
 up
 an annoying console window when it opens. I really dislikes it, haha.

 In general, I think the standalone installer is more clean. This is why
 I
 prefer it. :-)



 With all respect to your contribution Uwe, this is my preference too :-)


 I vote for the alt-installer ;)




-- 
Prof. Murat Yildizoglu
Université Paul Cézanne (Aix-Marseille 3)
GREQAM (UMR CNRS 6579)
Centre de la Vieille Charité
2, rue de la Charité
13236 Marseille cedex 02

Bureau 320
Tel : +33 4 91 14 07 27 (standard)
Tel : +33 4 91 14 07 70 (secrétariat)
Tel : +33 4 91 14 07 47 (bureau)
Fax : +33 4 91 90 02 27

e-mail: murat.yildizo...@univ-cezanne.fr
www : http://www.vcharite.univ-mrs.fr/PP/yildi/index.html
http://www.twitter.com/yildizoglu
__


GNUPLOT in Lyx? = How to allow Latex to call external programs?

2009-12-12 Thread peter kint
Hi,
I'm trying to gete PGF/Tikz compiled in Lyx for my mathematical illustrations.
For some functions, Latex must call external functions like GNUPLOT.

The solution is described below:

% PGF/Tikz doesn't support the following mathematical functions:
% tan, cosh, acosh, sinh, asinh, tanh, atanh
% Plotting will be done using GNUPLOT
% GNUPLOT must be installed and you must allow Latex to call external programs 
by
% Adding the following option to your compiler
% shell-escapeORenable-write18 
% Example: pdflatex --shell-escape file.tex 

How do I do this? How do I add this option to my compiler?

Thx for reading.
Peter



Re: eLyXer status update

2009-12-12 Thread Luke Venediger
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.comwrote:

 On 12/11/09, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl
 wrote:
  It works with the www prefix, but it is the skeptics that should read
   sceptics. (ok enough advertisements now ;-))
 
 As far as wordnet is concerned, both are accepted. :) It's probably
 another British vs American English.
 Liviu

 WordNet (r) 3.0 (2006) (wn)
 skeptic
n 1: someone who habitually doubts accepted beliefs [syn:
 skeptic, sceptic, doubter]


Hehe thanks Guys,

I'll have to register both domains to solve this one :)

Cheers,
Luke


Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Diego Queiroz wrote:
 Someone knoes when Windows binaries for Lyx 1.6.5 will be available?

It's available now.

Jürgen


Re: Lyx + gnuplot epslatex

2009-12-12 Thread peter kint
Jonathan Brandmeyer jbrandme...@... writes:

 
() 
 Since the latex produced by lyx only uses relative path names, I don't
 think that the error is in Lyx - it is in some program distributed with
 texlive.
 
 Thanks for the help.
 
 -Jonathan

Hi,
I'm not a Latex/lyx expert but I have the same kind of problems with
GNUPLOT in Lyx as you have.

I've been searching for a solution for centuries, and for me it boils
down to this:
% WARNING
% PGF/Tikz doesn't support the following mathematical functions:
% tan, cosh, acosh, sinh, asinh, tanh, atanh
% Plotting will be done using GNUPLOT
% GNUPLOT must be installed and you must allow Latex to call external
% programs  by
% Adding the following option to your compiler
% shell-escapeORenable-write18
% Example: pdflatex --shell-escape file.tex 

Maybe this is some help to you.
My question to you is: How do you add such a command to your compiler?
(I wouldn't know where to start, I'm only using Linux for 3 months now)
Peter  






Re: Lyx + gnuplot epslatex

2009-12-12 Thread peter kint
Jonathan Brandmeyer jbrandme...@... writes:

 
 I am having difficulty using Gnuplot's epslatex output in conjunction
 with Lyx. Gnuplot itself is capable of separately providing EPS graphics
 as well as text and labels as Tex code. Strictly speaking, I'm using
 Octave as a front-end to Gnuplot, but that shouldn't matter.
 


Hi,
I'm not a Latex/lyx expert but I have the same kind of problems with
GNUPLOT in Lyx as you have.

I've been searching for a solution for centuries, and for me it boils
down to this:

% WARNING
% PGF/Tikz doesn't support the following mathematical functions:
% tan, cosh, acosh, sinh, asinh, tanh, atanh
% Plotting will be done using GNUPLOT
% GNUPLOT must be installed and you must allow Latex to call external
% programs  by
% Adding the following option to your compiler
% shell-escapeORenable-write18
% Example: pdflatex --shell-escape file.tex 

Maybe this is some help to you.
My question to you is: How do you add such a command to your compiler?
(I wouldn't know where to start, I'm only using Linux for 3 months now)
Peter



Re: Lyx + gnuplot epslatex

2009-12-12 Thread Paul A. Rubin

peter kint wrote:


% WARNING
% PGF/Tikz doesn't support the following mathematical functions:
% tan, cosh, acosh, sinh, asinh, tanh, atanh
% Plotting will be done using GNUPLOT
% GNUPLOT must be installed and you must allow Latex to call external
% programs  by
% Adding the following option to your compiler
% shell-escapeORenable-write18
% Example: pdflatex --shell-escape file.tex 


Maybe this is some help to you.
My question to you is: How do you add such a command to your compiler?
(I wouldn't know where to start, I'm only using Linux for 3 months now)


(Disclaimer:  I have not tried this myself, since I don't use gnuplot.)

First, you obviously need to have gnuplot installed and working.

In LyX, go to Tools  Preferences  File Handling  Converters and 
select (highlight) the LaTeX (pdflatex) - PDF (pdflatex) converter. 
In the Converter: entry, change pdflatex $$i to pdflatex 
--shell-escape $$i and save it.  See if that helps.


If it does, you might consider a fancier solution.  You could go to 
Tools  Preferences  File Handling  File formats and create a new 
format (let's call it PDF (with plots)), then back to ...  Converters 
and create a LaTeX (pdflatex) - PDF (with plots) converter using the 
converter syntax above (and return the first converter to its original 
syntax).  You would then use View  PDF (with plots) rather than View 
 PDF (pdflatex) to view files with gnuplots in them (and similarly 
with file export). The reason for doing this would be security -- it 
would allow shell escapes only for documents where you knew you needed 
them. FWIW, I think the low security approach is pretty safe unless you 
have a habit of including raw LaTeX files from unverified sources in 
your documents.


/Paul



Re: launching LyX 1.6.5

2009-12-12 Thread E. Kaplan
Good news-- I saw Uwe's note that the standard installer for 1.6.5 for 
Windows is now finally available.  So I uninstalled Lyx once again, and 
using the standard installer was able to install and run Lyx on both 
Windows XP machines, on which the altinstaller was giving me such a hard 
time.
I now have Lyx working again on both machines, and all is well.  What 
is/was the source of the problem with the altinstaller might be a 
subject for further research, but for now I have a working system again.

EK



Uwe Stöhr wrote:

EK schrieb:


It still did /*not */work.  The response from running:
lyx -dbg 3 was: Lyx is not recognized as an internal or external 
command.. etc.


When calling
lyx -dbg 3
from the console, are you already in the folder where the lyx.exe file 
resides?
Lyx is not recognized as an internal or external command is the 
error message when you e.g. called lyx from C:\hello while lyx.exe is 
e.g. in C:\Programs\LyX 1.6.4
Can you please try it again and send me the whole log you get in the 
console when calling LyX?


Where does the lyx.exe reside?

Some general questions: Are you sure that no other LyX version is 
installed on your system? Where is MiKTeX 2.8 installed (what is the 
path to the latex.exe)?


regards Uwe


Re: Lyx + gnuplot epslatex

2009-12-12 Thread peter kint
Paul A. Rubin ru...@... writes:


 (Disclaimer:  I have not tried this myself, since I don't use gnuplot.)
 
 First, you obviously need to have gnuplot installed and working.
 
 In LyX, go to Tools  Preferences  File Handling  Converters and 

 /Paul
 
Hi Paul,
Your first suggestion did not work.
At compiling he gives an:which he did not give before:

 File does not exist:
 /tmp/lyx_tmpdir.T15846/lyx_tmpbuf2/ex_fys_5aso_2u_kerst.pdf
   (ex_fys_5aso_2u_kerst is the name of my file)

But my feeling is you are on the right track...

The problem now is that I cant compile any lyx-file anymore :-)
So , for the moment I'll try to get back to my previous Lyx-configuration.
Thanks for helping, you made me feel as if I'm 'pretty close'
Peter 





Distributing LYX and Myxtek

2009-12-12 Thread Philip
Hi Is there a way to distribute Lyx and Myxtek using group policy (Windows 
Server 2003)?



Re: launching LyX 1.6.5

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr

E. Kaplan schrieb:


  4. I tried to redirect the output of the cmd window to a file,


Instead of this, right-click into the console window and choose highlight. Then highlight the 
whole content of the window and copy it to a text file.


Currently I haven't any clue why it doesn't work for you -- I need the logfile.
As really nothing helps:

- uninstall LyX _completely_
- uninstall MiKTeX _completely_
- restart your PC
- log in as Admin and search the registry to assure that no leftovers are there. If you find 
something about lyx or miktex remove these registry keys.

- restart your PC
- install MiKTeX 2.8 manually (basic installer from www.miktex.org)
- install LyX 1.6.4! (not 1.6.5) using the small version of the alternative LyX 
installer

Does it then work?

regards Uwe


Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Diego Queiroz schrieb:


I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows up
an annoying console window when it opens.


Really? This should only be visible for a few milliseconds. Only at the first start after an 
installation the console Windows is shown to indicate the current installation status of LaTeX-packages.



In general, I think the standalone installer is more clean. This is why I
prefer it. :-)


They do basically the same (also the hiding of the console window), the 
differences are listed here:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyXWinInstaller#detailed-comparison

regards Uwe


Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Manveru schrieb:


In general, I think the standalone installer is more clean. This is why I
prefer it. :-)


With all respect to your contribution Uwe, this is my preference too :-)


Why exactly? How can I improve a product without clear statements?

regards Uwe


Re: OT: Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Murat Yildizoglu schrieb:


I find the console window slightly annoying,


Me too but I don't get a console Window. Not on Win2000, WinXP, WinVista, Win7. Also not on 64bit 
systems, and also not with an English, German, or Japanese Windows.


Do you always get this Window, also when double-clicking on the file 
lyxLauncher.exe?

regards Uwe


Re: Distributing LYX and Myxtek

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Philip schrieb:

Hi Is there a way to distribute Lyx and Myxtek using group policy (Windows 
Server 2003)?


I don't know if this is possible because I don't have a Windows server system and never worked with 
group policies. What works is when you install it as admin, choosing to install for all users on the 
system.
You can install MiKTeX separately. Look at its homepage to find out if it provides group policy 
support: http://www.miktex.org


regards Uwe


Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
I can see two console windows opening each time I launch Lyx using the  
bat file that has been installed by the alternative installer. They  
disappear very quickly (I do not have time to read their contents).

Murat

--
Murat Yildizoglu
murat.yildizo...@univ-cezanne.fr

Le 12 déc. 2009 à 21:49, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de a écrit :


Diego Queiroz schrieb:

I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer  
shows up

an annoying console window when it opens.


Really? This should only be visible for a few milliseconds. Only at  
the first start after an installation the console Windows is shown  
to indicate the current installation status of LaTeX-packages.


In general, I think the standalone installer is more clean. This  
is why I

prefer it. :-)


They do basically the same (also the hiding of the console window),  
the differences are listed here:

http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyXWinInstaller#detailed-comparison

regards Uwe


Re: Change order of bibliography entries

2009-12-12 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-12-11, Matthias Bußjäger wrote:

 I want to reference a standard with 10 parts.
...
 What I want to do is to change the order of the list of literature at 
 the end of my document. It seems that bibtex or lyx/latex decides this 
 order based on the name of the author.
 Is it possible to have effect on this order in another way, than to 
 change this name? (I don't really like the 01, 02  to get the right 
 order ;) )

AFAIK, this is possible with some special sort-key in the bibtex file.
This is described somewhere in the documentation that comes with bibtex.

Günter



Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Murat Yildizoglu schrieb:

I can see two console windows opening each time I launch Lyx using the 
bat file that has been installed by the alternative installer. They 
disappear very quickly (I do not have time to read their contents).


This is how it should be.
LyX is programmed in a way that a console is always started. My and also the standard installer 
hides it immediately. That you can see the console for a few milliseconds is normal. The time 
depends on the speed of your system.

So I don't understand your concerns.

regards Uwe


Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Manveru
2009/12/12 Diego Queiroz :
> Hello.
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows up
> an annoying console window when it opens. I really dislikes it, haha.
>
> In general, I think the standalone installer is more "clean". This is why I
> prefer it. :-)
>

With all respect to your contribution Uwe, this is my preference too :-)

-- 
Manveru
jabber: manv...@manveru.pl
 gg: 1624001
   http://www.manveru.pl


Re: launching LyX 1.6.5

2009-12-12 Thread E. Kaplan

Dear Uwe,
Thanks for your help.

  1. I got the error when I was in the C:\program files\Lyx 1.6.5\bin
 directory.
  2. Lyx.exe resides in that same directory
  3. As far as I know, no other Lyx is installed on either one of the
 two XP systems where the alitnstaller fails (I removed Lyx before
 the installation using the Windows Add or Remove Programs tool)
  4. I tried to redirect the output of the cmd window to a file, but
 even though the file opens, nothing is ever written to it, so I
 cannot send you the log-- it is empty.  The Task manager shows the
 Lyxlauncher to be running, but it seems to be doing nothing.
  5. Miktex was originally installed on my machine and worked without
 any problems (using Lyx, Winedt, etc.)  I removed and reinstalled
 it when the altinstaller failed. 
  6. The path to latex.exe is: c:\program files\miktex 2.8\miktex\bin


EK


Ehud Kaplan, Ph.D.
Jules and Doris Stein /Research to Prevent Blindness/ Professor
*The laboratory of Visual & Computational Neuroscience*
Depts. of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Chemical & Structural Biology
The Mount Sinai School of Medicine
One Gustave Levy Place
New York, NY, 10029



Uwe Stöhr wrote:

EK schrieb:


It still did /*not */work.  The response from running:
lyx -dbg 3 was: Lyx is not recognized as an internal or external 
command.. etc.


When calling
lyx -dbg 3
from the console, are you already in the folder where the lyx.exe file 
resides?
"Lyx is not recognized as an internal or external command" is the 
error message when you e.g. called lyx from C:\hello while lyx.exe is 
e.g. in C:\Programs\LyX 1.6.4
Can you please try it again and send me the whole log you get in the 
console when calling LyX?


Where does the lyx.exe reside?

Some general questions: Are you sure that no other LyX version is 
installed on your system? Where is MiKTeX 2.8 installed (what is the 
path to the latex.exe)?


regards Uwe


Font sizes for the menu

2009-12-12 Thread Hartmut Haase
Hi,
I asked this already some time ago but I lost the answer:

The font size of the menu bar (File Edit View ...) is crontrolled by some 
gnome-program (?). Can someone tell me which one?
-- 
Viele Grüße,
Hartmut Haase

Hungerhilfe: http://www.thehungersite.com

Ohne Zensur suchen:
http://suche.amnesty-bergedorf.de/

Das heutige Motto:
Das Leben ist zu kostbar, um es dem Schicksal zu überlassen. (Deus X. Machina)


Re: Font sizes for the menu

2009-12-12 Thread Liviu Andronic
On 12/12/09, Hartmut Haase  wrote:
>  The font size of the menu bar (File Edit View ...) is crontrolled by some
>  gnome-program (?). Can someone tell me which one?
>
No, this QT toolkit. Use qtconfig-qt4 (on Linux).
Liviu


OT: Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Florian Rubach

Am 12.12.2009 09:00, schrieb Manveru:

2009/12/12 Diego Queiroz:
   

Hello.

Thanks for your reply.

I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows up
an annoying console window when it opens. I really dislikes it, haha.

In general, I think the standalone installer is more "clean". This is why I
prefer it. :-)

 

With all respect to your contribution Uwe, this is my preference too :-)
   


I vote for the alt-installer ;)


Re: OT: Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
I have recently adopted the AltInstaller and I really like the upgrade
function and "everything you need is in" dimension of the complete
version. I first do a complete Miktex install or update, then the
upgrade through the AltInstaller and it works like a charm, even very
quick. I find the console window slightly annoying, but not enough to
counter-weight the advantages of the bundle. So, one vote for the alt
installer here too.

Thanks again Uwe for this public service!

Regards,

Murat

2009/12/12 Florian Rubach :
> Am 12.12.2009 09:00, schrieb Manveru:
>>
>> 2009/12/12 Diego Queiroz:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>>
>>> I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows
>>> up
>>> an annoying console window when it opens. I really dislikes it, haha.
>>>
>>> In general, I think the standalone installer is more "clean". This is why
>>> I
>>> prefer it. :-)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> With all respect to your contribution Uwe, this is my preference too :-)
>>
>
> I vote for the alt-installer ;)
>



-- 
Prof. Murat Yildizoglu
Université Paul Cézanne (Aix-Marseille 3)
GREQAM (UMR CNRS 6579)
Centre de la Vieille Charité
2, rue de la Charité
13236 Marseille cedex 02

Bureau 320
Tel : +33 4 91 14 07 27 (standard)
Tel : +33 4 91 14 07 70 (secrétariat)
Tel : +33 4 91 14 07 47 (bureau)
Fax : +33 4 91 90 02 27

e-mail: murat.yildizo...@univ-cezanne.fr
www : http://www.vcharite.univ-mrs.fr/PP/yildi/index.html
http://www.twitter.com/yildizoglu
__


GNUPLOT in Lyx? = How to allow Latex to call external programs?

2009-12-12 Thread peter kint
Hi,
I'm trying to gete PGF/Tikz compiled in Lyx for my mathematical illustrations.
For some functions, Latex must call external functions like GNUPLOT.

The solution is described below:

% PGF/Tikz doesn't support the following mathematical functions:
% tan, cosh, acosh, sinh, asinh, tanh, atanh
% Plotting will be done using GNUPLOT
% GNUPLOT must be installed and you must allow Latex to call external programs 
by
% Adding the following option to your compiler
% shell-escapeORenable-write18 
% Example: pdflatex --shell-escape file.tex 

How do I do this? How do I add this option to my compiler?

Thx for reading.
Peter



Re: eLyXer status update

2009-12-12 Thread Luke Venediger
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:

> On 12/11/09, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW 
> wrote:
> > It works with the www prefix, but it is the skeptics that should read
> >  sceptics. (ok enough advertisements now ;-))
> >
> As far as wordnet is concerned, both are accepted. :) It's probably
> another British vs American English.
> Liviu
>
> WordNet (r) 3.0 (2006) (wn)
> skeptic
>n 1: someone who habitually doubts accepted beliefs [syn:
> skeptic, sceptic, doubter]
>

Hehe thanks Guys,

I'll have to register both domains to solve this one :)

Cheers,
Luke


Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Diego Queiroz wrote:
> Someone knoes when Windows binaries for Lyx 1.6.5 will be available?

It's available now.

Jürgen


Re: Lyx + gnuplot epslatex

2009-12-12 Thread peter kint
Jonathan Brandmeyer  writes:

> 
() 
> Since the latex produced by lyx only uses relative path names, I don't
> think that the error is in Lyx - it is in some program distributed with
> texlive.
> 
> Thanks for the help.
> 
> -Jonathan

Hi,
I'm not a Latex/lyx expert but I have the same kind of problems with
GNUPLOT in Lyx as you have.

I've been searching for a solution for centuries, and for me it boils
down to this:
% <<>>
% PGF/Tikz doesn't support the following mathematical functions:
% tan, cosh, acosh, sinh, asinh, tanh, atanh
% Plotting will be done using GNUPLOT
% GNUPLOT must be installed and you must allow Latex to call external
% programs  by
% Adding the following option to your compiler
% shell-escapeORenable-write18
% Example: pdflatex --shell-escape file.tex 

Maybe this is some help to you.
My question to you is: How do you add such a command to your compiler?
(I wouldn't know where to start, I'm only using Linux for 3 months now)
Peter  






Re: Lyx + gnuplot epslatex

2009-12-12 Thread peter kint
Jonathan Brandmeyer  writes:

> 
> I am having difficulty using Gnuplot's epslatex output in conjunction
> with Lyx. Gnuplot itself is capable of separately providing EPS graphics
> as well as text and labels as Tex code. Strictly speaking, I'm using
> Octave as a front-end to Gnuplot, but that shouldn't matter.
> 


Hi,
I'm not a Latex/lyx expert but I have the same kind of problems with
GNUPLOT in Lyx as you have.

I've been searching for a solution for centuries, and for me it boils
down to this:

% <<>>
% PGF/Tikz doesn't support the following mathematical functions:
% tan, cosh, acosh, sinh, asinh, tanh, atanh
% Plotting will be done using GNUPLOT
% GNUPLOT must be installed and you must allow Latex to call external
% programs  by
% Adding the following option to your compiler
% shell-escapeORenable-write18
% Example: pdflatex --shell-escape file.tex 

Maybe this is some help to you.
My question to you is: How do you add such a command to your compiler?
(I wouldn't know where to start, I'm only using Linux for 3 months now)
Peter



Re: Lyx + gnuplot epslatex

2009-12-12 Thread Paul A. Rubin

peter kint wrote:


% <<>>
% PGF/Tikz doesn't support the following mathematical functions:
% tan, cosh, acosh, sinh, asinh, tanh, atanh
% Plotting will be done using GNUPLOT
% GNUPLOT must be installed and you must allow Latex to call external
% programs  by
% Adding the following option to your compiler
% shell-escapeORenable-write18
% Example: pdflatex --shell-escape file.tex 


Maybe this is some help to you.
My question to you is: How do you add such a command to your compiler?
(I wouldn't know where to start, I'm only using Linux for 3 months now)


(Disclaimer:  I have not tried this myself, since I don't use gnuplot.)

First, you obviously need to have gnuplot installed and working.

In LyX, go to Tools > Preferences > File Handling > Converters and 
select (highlight) the "LaTeX (pdflatex) -> PDF (pdflatex)" converter. 
In the "Converter:" entry, change "pdflatex $$i" to "pdflatex 
--shell-escape $$i" and save it.  See if that helps.


If it does, you might consider a fancier solution.  You could go to 
Tools > Preferences > File Handling > File formats and create a new 
format (let's call it "PDF (with plots)"), then back to ... > Converters 
and create a "LaTeX (pdflatex) -> PDF (with plots)" converter using the 
converter syntax above (and return the first converter to its original 
syntax).  You would then use "View > PDF (with plots)" rather than "View 
> PDF (pdflatex)" to view files with gnuplots in them (and similarly 
with file export). The reason for doing this would be security -- it 
would allow shell escapes only for documents where you knew you needed 
them. FWIW, I think the low security approach is pretty safe unless you 
have a habit of including raw LaTeX files from unverified sources in 
your documents.


/Paul



Re: launching LyX 1.6.5

2009-12-12 Thread E. Kaplan
Good news-- I saw Uwe's note that the standard installer for 1.6.5 for 
Windows is now finally available.  So I uninstalled Lyx once again, and 
using the standard installer was able to install and run Lyx on both 
Windows XP machines, on which the altinstaller was giving me such a hard 
time.
I now have Lyx working again on both machines, and all is well.  What 
is/was the source of the problem with the altinstaller might be a 
subject for further research, but for now I have a working system again.

EK



Uwe Stöhr wrote:

EK schrieb:


It still did /*not */work.  The response from running:
lyx -dbg 3 was: Lyx is not recognized as an internal or external 
command.. etc.


When calling
lyx -dbg 3
from the console, are you already in the folder where the lyx.exe file 
resides?
"Lyx is not recognized as an internal or external command" is the 
error message when you e.g. called lyx from C:\hello while lyx.exe is 
e.g. in C:\Programs\LyX 1.6.4
Can you please try it again and send me the whole log you get in the 
console when calling LyX?


Where does the lyx.exe reside?

Some general questions: Are you sure that no other LyX version is 
installed on your system? Where is MiKTeX 2.8 installed (what is the 
path to the latex.exe)?


regards Uwe


Re: Lyx + gnuplot epslatex

2009-12-12 Thread peter kint
Paul A. Rubin  writes:


> (Disclaimer:  I have not tried this myself, since I don't use gnuplot.)
> 
> First, you obviously need to have gnuplot installed and working.
> 
> In LyX, go to Tools > Preferences > File Handling > Converters and 

> /Paul
 
Hi Paul,
Your first suggestion did not work.
At compiling he gives an:which he did not give before:

 File does not exist:
 /tmp/lyx_tmpdir.T15846/lyx_tmpbuf2/ex_fys_5aso_2u_kerst.pdf
   (ex_fys_5aso_2u_kerst is the name of my file)

But my feeling is you are on the right track...

The problem now is that I cant compile any lyx-file anymore :-)
So , for the moment I'll try to get back to my previous Lyx-configuration.
Thanks for helping, you made me feel as if I'm 'pretty close'
Peter 





Distributing LYX and Myxtek

2009-12-12 Thread Philip
Hi Is there a way to distribute Lyx and Myxtek using group policy (Windows 
Server 2003)?



Re: launching LyX 1.6.5

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr

E. Kaplan schrieb:


  4. I tried to redirect the output of the cmd window to a file,


Instead of this, right-click into the console window and choose "highlight". Then highlight the 
whole content of the window and copy it to a text file.


Currently I haven't any clue why it doesn't work for you -- I need the logfile.
As really nothing helps:

- uninstall LyX _completely_
- uninstall MiKTeX _completely_
- restart your PC
- log in as Admin and search the registry to assure that no leftovers are there. If you find 
something about "lyx" or "miktex" remove these registry keys.

- restart your PC
- install MiKTeX 2.8 manually (basic installer from www.miktex.org)
- install LyX 1.6.4! (not 1.6.5) using the small version of the alternative LyX 
installer

Does it then work?

regards Uwe


Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Diego Queiroz schrieb:


I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer shows up
an annoying console window when it opens.


Really? This should only be visible for a few milliseconds. Only at the first start after an 
installation the console Windows is shown to indicate the current installation status of LaTeX-packages.



In general, I think the standalone installer is more "clean". This is why I
prefer it. :-)


They do basically the same (also the hiding of the console window), the 
differences are listed here:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyXWinInstaller#detailed-comparison

regards Uwe


Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Manveru schrieb:


In general, I think the standalone installer is more "clean". This is why I
prefer it. :-)


With all respect to your contribution Uwe, this is my preference too :-)


Why exactly? How can I improve a product without clear statements?

regards Uwe


Re: OT: Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Murat Yildizoglu schrieb:


I find the console window slightly annoying,


Me too but I don't get a console Window. Not on Win2000, WinXP, WinVista, Win7. Also not on 64bit 
systems, and also not with an English, German, or Japanese Windows.


Do you always get this Window, also when double-clicking on the file 
"lyxLauncher.exe"?

regards Uwe


Re: Distributing LYX and Myxtek

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Philip schrieb:

Hi Is there a way to distribute Lyx and Myxtek using group policy (Windows 
Server 2003)?


I don't know if this is possible because I don't have a Windows server system and never worked with 
group policies. What works is when you install it as admin, choosing to install for all users on the 
system.
You can install MiKTeX separately. Look at its homepage to find out if it provides group policy 
support: http://www.miktex.org


regards Uwe


Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
I can see two console windows opening each time I launch Lyx using the  
bat file that has been installed by the alternative installer. They  
disappear very quickly (I do not have time to read their contents).

Murat

--
Murat Yildizoglu
murat.yildizo...@univ-cezanne.fr

Le 12 déc. 2009 à 21:49, Uwe Stöhr  a écrit :


Diego Queiroz schrieb:

I don't know if it is a good reason, but the alternative installer  
shows up

an annoying console window when it opens.


Really? This should only be visible for a few milliseconds. Only at  
the first start after an installation the console Windows is shown  
to indicate the current installation status of LaTeX-packages.


In general, I think the standalone installer is more "clean". This  
is why I

prefer it. :-)


They do basically the same (also the hiding of the console window),  
the differences are listed here:

http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyXWinInstaller#detailed-comparison

regards Uwe


Re: Change order of bibliography entries

2009-12-12 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-12-11, Matthias Bußjäger wrote:

>>> I want to reference a standard with 10 parts.
...
> What I want to do is to change the order of the list of literature at 
> the end of my document. It seems that bibtex or lyx/latex decides this 
> order based on the name of the author.
> Is it possible to have effect on this order in another way, than to 
> change this name? (I don't really like the 01, 02  to get the right 
> order ;) )

AFAIK, this is possible with some special sort-key in the bibtex file.
This is described somewhere in the documentation that comes with bibtex.

Günter



Re: Lyx 1.6.5 Installer

2009-12-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Murat Yildizoglu schrieb:

I can see two console windows opening each time I launch Lyx using the 
bat file that has been installed by the alternative installer. They 
disappear very quickly (I do not have time to read their contents).


This is how it should be.
LyX is programmed in a way that a console is always started. My and also the standard installer 
hides it immediately. That you can see the console for a few milliseconds is normal. The time 
depends on the speed of your system.

So I don't understand your concerns.

regards Uwe