Re: Have you tested 2.3.0beta1?

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

2017-09-06 13:20 GMT+02:00 Sergio Celani :

> Hi
>
> With windows 10 (spanish) there exists a problem with the screen fonts. In
> Tools ->Preferences -> the Default zoom 100 %, I have changed to a larger
> value, for example 200%, and nothing happens.
>

This is due to an interface change that is currently discussed [1].
Meanwhile, you can change the zoom via - or -<+>/<->

Jürgen

[1] See http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10455



>
>
> Sergio, from Argentina
>
> Bye
>

Re: Have you tested 2.3.0beta1?

[Wolfgang Engelmann]

Am 06.09.2017 um 01:25 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:

I have not seen many bugs that have been reported regarding 2.3.0beta1.
I would like to know whether this means that 2.3.0beta1 can be
considered stable, which is what I believe, or whether it is just that
not many people have tested it and that is why there have not been many
bug reports.

If you've tested, it would be useful if you just respond with e.g. "yes
I briefly tested and didn't find any issues".

If you're interested in testing, please back up all of your files.

One useful way to test is to compile your current .lyx files. If you get
a LaTeX error where with a previous .lyx file you did not, then that
could be a bug.

Thanks,

Scott
I use lyx-2.3.1beta-1 under Debian Jessie. I had no problems with it so 
far. I was advised to start it with src/lyx -dbg info, which I do in 
this way

~/lyx-2.3.1beta-1$ src/lyx -dbg info
Does it mean, that in case of a problem the infos would be written into 
the file info and that this file will be in the folder 
~/lyx-2.3.1beta-1? So far there was no such file created.

Wolfgang

Re: Have you tested 2.3.0beta1?

[Andrew Parsloe]

On 6/09/2017 11:25 a.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote:

I have not seen many bugs that have been reported regarding 2.3.0beta1.
I would like to know whether this means that 2.3.0beta1 can be
considered stable, which is what I believe, or whether it is just that
not many people have tested it and that is why there have not been many
bug reports.

If you've tested, it would be useful if you just respond with e.g. "yes
I briefly tested and didn't find any issues".

If you're interested in testing, please back up all of your files.

One useful way to test is to compile your current .lyx files. If you get
a LaTeX error where with a previous .lyx file you did not, then that
could be a bug.

Thanks,

Scott

My documents are compiling without problem with beta1. However, I 
haven't been using LyX intensively just at the moment.


Andrew

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Re: Have you tested 2.3.0beta1?

[Anders Ekberg]

Tested briefly on Mac latest OS and fresh TeX installation. Only problem was 
that the welcome document complains about unknown image format (svgz?)
If that is ignored the document compiles fine except for that image, but it 
should preferably be fixed.

Anders

> 6 sep. 2017 kl. 01:25 skrev Scott Kostyshak :
> 
> I have not seen many bugs that have been reported regarding 2.3.0beta1.
> I would like to know whether this means that 2.3.0beta1 can be
> considered stable, which is what I believe, or whether it is just that
> not many people have tested it and that is why there have not been many
> bug reports.
> 
> If you've tested, it would be useful if you just respond with e.g. "yes
> I briefly tested and didn't find any issues".
> 
> If you're interested in testing, please back up all of your files.
> 
> One useful way to test is to compile your current .lyx files. If you get
> a LaTeX error where with a previous .lyx file you did not, then that
> could be a bug.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Scott