Re: Multibib possible in Lyx?

2012-05-24 Thread Rainer M Krug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 23/05/12 22:45, Vivek Sharma wrote:
 I am writing my CV and would like to do the following: 1. add bibliography 
 under different
 sections: Books, Peer reviewed papers published, Submitted, Conference 
 presentations.

Possible - check Document - Settings - Bibliography and enable sectioned 
bibliography

 2. I have in my bibtex file the necessary entries with keyword as 'BOOKS', 
 'Peer reviewed
 publications' etc. 3. I would like all entries with key word BOOKS under 
 section BOOKS 
 printed in chronological order with most recent first. and all entries with 
 keyword 
 printed in chronological order with most recent first under section  
 and so on. I know
 some people have doneere
 
 this using biblatex or multibib in latex.

Hm - I have separate bib files for each bibliography (Books, Peer Reviewed 
Paper, ...) and
selected under Content all references. I don't think you can filter them as 
you are asking for.

There is a section about CV in the LyX wiki - check it out. Also about the 
usage of multibib.

If this doesn't help, I could mail you my CV as an example on how to do it.

Cheers,

Rainer.

 I wonder if anyone has done it in Lyx and if so be willing to share how this 
 was done.
 
 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk+96QIACgkQoYgNqgF2egorTQCgggadfCGUbe/mrdPQMhyOYfVe
5tMAn0679aZAzhXKRiNGlILBm7pg/sd3
=AsW+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: Multibib possible in Lyx?

2012-05-24 Thread Rainer M Krug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 23/05/12 22:45, Vivek Sharma wrote:
 I am writing my CV and would like to do the following: 1. add bibliography 
 under different
 sections: Books, Peer reviewed papers published, Submitted, Conference 
 presentations.

Possible - check Document - Settings - Bibliography and enable sectioned 
bibliography

 2. I have in my bibtex file the necessary entries with keyword as 'BOOKS', 
 'Peer reviewed
 publications' etc. 3. I would like all entries with key word BOOKS under 
 section BOOKS 
 printed in chronological order with most recent first. and all entries with 
 keyword 
 printed in chronological order with most recent first under section  
 and so on. I know
 some people have doneere
 
 this using biblatex or multibib in latex.

Hm - I have separate bib files for each bibliography (Books, Peer Reviewed 
Paper, ...) and
selected under Content all references. I don't think you can filter them as 
you are asking for.

There is a section about CV in the LyX wiki - check it out. Also about the 
usage of multibib.

If this doesn't help, I could mail you my CV as an example on how to do it.

Cheers,

Rainer.

 I wonder if anyone has done it in Lyx and if so be willing to share how this 
 was done.
 
 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk+96QIACgkQoYgNqgF2egorTQCgggadfCGUbe/mrdPQMhyOYfVe
5tMAn0679aZAzhXKRiNGlILBm7pg/sd3
=AsW+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: Multibib possible in Lyx?

2012-05-24 Thread Rainer M Krug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 23/05/12 22:45, Vivek Sharma wrote:
> I am writing my CV and would like to do the following: 1. add bibliography 
> under different
> sections: Books, Peer reviewed papers published, Submitted, Conference 
> presentations.

Possible - check Document - Settings - Bibliography and enable sectioned 
bibliography

> 2. I have in my bibtex file the necessary entries with keyword as 'BOOKS', 
> 'Peer reviewed
> publications' etc. 3. I would like all entries with key word "BOOKS" under 
> section BOOKS 
> printed in chronological order with most recent first. and all entries with 
> keyword ""
> printed in chronological order with most recent first under section "" 
> and so on. I know
> some people have doneere
> 
> this using biblatex or multibib in latex.

Hm - I have separate bib files for each bibliography (Books, Peer Reviewed 
Paper, ...) and
selected under Content "all references". I don't think you can filter them as 
you are asking for.

There is a section about CV in the LyX wiki - check it out. Also about the 
usage of multibib.

If this doesn't help, I could mail you my CV as an example on how to do it.

Cheers,

Rainer.

> I wonder if anyone has done it in Lyx and if so be willing to share how this 
> was done.
> 
> 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk+96QIACgkQoYgNqgF2egorTQCgggadfCGUbe/mrdPQMhyOYfVe
5tMAn0679aZAzhXKRiNGlILBm7pg/sd3
=AsW+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: Is this possible in LyX?

2008-07-10 Thread Yago

Or the same code if you use the MnSymbol pacakge.
- Original Message - 
From: James Sutherland [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: Is this possible in LyX?




On Jul 8, 2008, at 2:27 PM, bigblop wrote:



Is it possible to make the following expression in lyx:

http://img241.imageshack.us/my.php?image=testzj5.jpg
--  View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Is-this-possible-in-LyX--tp18348332p18348332.html

Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Of course.  Enter the following in LyX's math mode:
U = \{ \underbrace{a,\ldots,a}_{p+1}, u_{p+1}, \ldots, u_{m-p-1}, 
\underbrace{b,\ldots,b}_{p+1} \}

There are also many helpful gui items in math mode that can help.

James

__ Información de NOD32, revisión 3251 (20080708) __

Este mensaje ha sido analizado con  NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com






Re: Is this possible in LyX?

2008-07-10 Thread Yago

Or the same code if you use the MnSymbol pacakge.
- Original Message - 
From: James Sutherland [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: Is this possible in LyX?




On Jul 8, 2008, at 2:27 PM, bigblop wrote:



Is it possible to make the following expression in lyx:

http://img241.imageshack.us/my.php?image=testzj5.jpg
--  View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Is-this-possible-in-LyX--tp18348332p18348332.html

Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Of course.  Enter the following in LyX's math mode:
U = \{ \underbrace{a,\ldots,a}_{p+1}, u_{p+1}, \ldots, u_{m-p-1}, 
\underbrace{b,\ldots,b}_{p+1} \}

There are also many helpful gui items in math mode that can help.

James

__ Información de NOD32, revisión 3251 (20080708) __

Este mensaje ha sido analizado con  NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com






Re: Is this possible in LyX?

2008-07-10 Thread Yago

Or the same code if you use the MnSymbol pacakge.
- Original Message - 
From: "James Sutherland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: Is this possible in LyX?




On Jul 8, 2008, at 2:27 PM, bigblop wrote:



Is it possible to make the following expression in lyx:

http://img241.imageshack.us/my.php?image=testzj5.jpg
--  View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Is-this-possible-in-LyX--tp18348332p18348332.html

Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Of course.  Enter the following in LyX's math mode:
U = \{ \underbrace{a,\ldots,a}_{p+1}, u_{p+1}, \ldots, u_{m-p-1}, 
\underbrace{b,\ldots,b}_{p+1} \}

There are also many helpful gui items in math mode that can help.

James

__ Información de NOD32, revisión 3251 (20080708) __

Este mensaje ha sido analizado con  NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com






Re: Is this possible in LyX?

2008-07-08 Thread James Sutherland


On Jul 8, 2008, at 2:27 PM, bigblop wrote:



Is it possible to make the following expression in lyx:

http://img241.imageshack.us/my.php?image=testzj5.jpg
--  
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-this-possible-in-LyX--tp18348332p18348332.html

Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Of course.  Enter the following in LyX's math mode:
U = \{ \underbrace{a,\ldots,a}_{p+1}, u_{p+1}, \ldots, u_{m-p-1},  
\underbrace{b,\ldots,b}_{p+1} \}

There are also many helpful gui items in math mode that can help.

James


Re: Is this possible in LyX?

2008-07-08 Thread James Sutherland


On Jul 8, 2008, at 2:27 PM, bigblop wrote:



Is it possible to make the following expression in lyx:

http://img241.imageshack.us/my.php?image=testzj5.jpg
--  
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-this-possible-in-LyX--tp18348332p18348332.html

Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Of course.  Enter the following in LyX's math mode:
U = \{ \underbrace{a,\ldots,a}_{p+1}, u_{p+1}, \ldots, u_{m-p-1},  
\underbrace{b,\ldots,b}_{p+1} \}

There are also many helpful gui items in math mode that can help.

James


Re: Is this possible in LyX?

2008-07-08 Thread James Sutherland


On Jul 8, 2008, at 2:27 PM, bigblop wrote:



Is it possible to make the following expression in lyx:

http://img241.imageshack.us/my.php?image=testzj5.jpg
--  
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-this-possible-in-LyX--tp18348332p18348332.html

Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Of course.  Enter the following in LyX's math mode:
U = \{ \underbrace{a,\ldots,a}_{p+1}, u_{p+1}, \ldots, u_{m-p-1},  
\underbrace{b,\ldots,b}_{p+1} \}

There are also many helpful gui items in math mode that can help.

James


itemize/enumerate in theorem environment possible in LyX ?

2005-11-06 Thread H. Peter Gumm
Hi,

I frequently want to use itemize and/or enumerate within a
theorem environment. I know how to do it with ERT, can I
do it solely with LyX, too ?

I am using the article(AMS) layout.

Greetings,
H.Peter Gumm





Re: itemize/enumerate in theorem environment possible in LyX ?

2005-11-06 Thread Paul A. Rubin

H. Peter Gumm wrote:

Hi,

I frequently want to use itemize and/or enumerate within a
theorem environment. I know how to do it with ERT, can I
do it solely with LyX, too ?

I am using the article(AMS) layout.

Greetings,
H.Peter Gumm




At the point in the theorem where you want the enumeration, hit Enter 
and change the environment from Theorem to Itemize or Enumerate.  Build 
the list, then highlight it and increase the environment depth by 1 
(Layout-Increase Environment Depth or S-M-Right or click the tool bar 
button that looks like a paragraph being indented from the left).


Paul




itemize/enumerate in theorem environment possible in LyX ?

2005-11-06 Thread H. Peter Gumm
Hi,

I frequently want to use itemize and/or enumerate within a
theorem environment. I know how to do it with ERT, can I
do it solely with LyX, too ?

I am using the article(AMS) layout.

Greetings,
H.Peter Gumm





Re: itemize/enumerate in theorem environment possible in LyX ?

2005-11-06 Thread Paul A. Rubin

H. Peter Gumm wrote:

Hi,

I frequently want to use itemize and/or enumerate within a
theorem environment. I know how to do it with ERT, can I
do it solely with LyX, too ?

I am using the article(AMS) layout.

Greetings,
H.Peter Gumm




At the point in the theorem where you want the enumeration, hit Enter 
and change the environment from Theorem to Itemize or Enumerate.  Build 
the list, then highlight it and increase the environment depth by 1 
(Layout-Increase Environment Depth or S-M-Right or click the tool bar 
button that looks like a paragraph being indented from the left).


Paul




itemize/enumerate in theorem environment possible in LyX ?

2005-11-06 Thread H. Peter Gumm
Hi,

I frequently want to use itemize and/or enumerate within a
theorem environment. I know how to do it with ERT, can I
do it solely with LyX, too ?

I am using the article(AMS) layout.

Greetings,
H.Peter Gumm





Re: itemize/enumerate in theorem environment possible in LyX ?

2005-11-06 Thread Paul A. Rubin

H. Peter Gumm wrote:

Hi,

I frequently want to use itemize and/or enumerate within a
theorem environment. I know how to do it with ERT, can I
do it solely with LyX, too ?

I am using the article(AMS) layout.

Greetings,
H.Peter Gumm




At the point in the theorem where you want the enumeration, hit Enter 
and change the environment from Theorem to Itemize or Enumerate.  Build 
the list, then highlight it and increase the environment depth by 1 
(Layout->Increase Environment Depth or S-M-Right or click the tool bar 
button that looks like a paragraph being indented from the left).


Paul




Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-11-02 Thread chr
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Paul Smith wrote:

 I would add two different entries to the Wiki: one to answer the question
 
 1. How can I disallow LaTeX to linebreak an inlined math formula?;

Now added as 
http://wiki.lyx.org/Examples/PreventingLinebreakInInlineFormula

as for the boxed thing, I'm leaving it since it seemed to get kind of 
complicated.

/Christian

-- 
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44   http://www.md.kth.se/~chr




Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-11-02 Thread Paul Smith
On 11/2/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I would add two different entries to the Wiki: one to answer the question
 
  1. How can I disallow LaTeX to linebreak an inlined math formula?;

 Now added as
 http://wiki.lyx.org/Examples/PreventingLinebreakInInlineFormula

 as for the boxed thing, I'm leaving it since it seemed to get kind of
 complicated.

Thanks, Christian.

Paul


Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-11-02 Thread chr
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Paul Smith wrote:

 I would add two different entries to the Wiki: one to answer the question
 
 1. How can I disallow LaTeX to linebreak an inlined math formula?;

Now added as 
http://wiki.lyx.org/Examples/PreventingLinebreakInInlineFormula

as for the boxed thing, I'm leaving it since it seemed to get kind of 
complicated.

/Christian

-- 
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44   http://www.md.kth.se/~chr




Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-11-02 Thread Paul Smith
On 11/2/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I would add two different entries to the Wiki: one to answer the question
 
  1. How can I disallow LaTeX to linebreak an inlined math formula?;

 Now added as
 http://wiki.lyx.org/Examples/PreventingLinebreakInInlineFormula

 as for the boxed thing, I'm leaving it since it seemed to get kind of
 complicated.

Thanks, Christian.

Paul


Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-11-02 Thread chr
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Paul Smith wrote:

> I would add two different entries to the Wiki: one to answer the question
> 
> 1. How can I disallow LaTeX to linebreak an inlined math formula?;

Now added as 
http://wiki.lyx.org/Examples/PreventingLinebreakInInlineFormula

as for the boxed thing, I'm leaving it since it seemed to get kind of 
complicated.

/Christian

-- 
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44   http://www.md.kth.se/~chr




Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-11-02 Thread Paul Smith
On 11/2/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would add two different entries to the Wiki: one to answer the question
> >
> > 1. How can I disallow LaTeX to linebreak an inlined math formula?;
>
> Now added as
> http://wiki.lyx.org/Examples/PreventingLinebreakInInlineFormula
>
> as for the boxed thing, I'm leaving it since it seemed to get kind of
> complicated.

Thanks, Christian.

Paul


Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-10-26 Thread Herbert Voss
ZAVARISE GIORGIO wrote:

Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto:  Re: Is this possible in lyx?
Data: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:14:54 +0100
A:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
 
 
 
On 10/25/05, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
  I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
  a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
  line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
  breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
  a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
  what about lyx? how can I perform an \mbox in Lyx? ..
  I can of course input a latex code within lyx.. but it
  would be great if I could do it in a lyx way too so
  that I could also have the benefit of actually seeing
  to formula.

 _inside_ the math mode put all in braces { ... }
 no need for ERT
 
Inside math mode, just write
 
\mbox
 
This solution does not need ERT as well.
 
Paul
 
 I needed it also, and it works fine, thanks, but to see
 the box frame I used \fbox.

enable the amsmath button and then use \boxed{...}
inside the math mode, it is the better way

Herbert




Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-10-26 Thread Paul Smith
On 10/25/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I thought I'd add the stuff below to the wiki, but first I'd like to check
 that it's correct (since I haven't tried it myself).


 
 Question:
 How can I disallow LaTeX to linebreak an inlined math formula?
 (This is typically useful for formulas at the end of a line)

 Answer:
 You can put the formula inside an mbox to prevent LaTeX from
 splitting up the formula. The steps can be summarized as follows:

 1) Go to math mode (inline formula or display formula)
 2) Type \mbox and then a press carriage return or the spacebar
 3) The text \mbox disappear and a box appears
 4) Type the equation inside the box

 Note that if you'd like a frame around your equation, you can use fbox
 instead of mbox.
 -

Christian,

I think the text below is correct and appropiate.

Regards,

Paul

Question:
How can I disallow LaTeX to linebreak an inlined math formula?
(This is typically useful for formulas at the end of a line)

Answer:
You can put the formula inside an mbox to prevent LaTeX from
splitting up the formula. The steps can be summarized as follows:

1) Go to math mode (inline formula or display formula)
2) Type \mbox and then a press carriage return or the spacebar
3) The text \mbox disappears and a box appears
4) Select math mode
5) Type the equation inside the box

Alternatively to the above solution, you can type, inside math mode,
\{ and \}, respectively, before and after your formula.

Question:
How can I insert a frame around my equation?

1) Go to math mode (inline formula or display formula)
2) Type \boxed  and then a press carriage return or the spacebar
3) The text \boxed disappears and a framed box appears
4) Type the equation inside the box


Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-10-26 Thread Herbert Voss
ZAVARISE GIORGIO wrote:

Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto:  Re: Is this possible in lyx?
Data: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:14:54 +0100
A:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
 
 
 
On 10/25/05, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
  I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
  a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
  line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
  breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
  a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
  what about lyx? how can I perform an \mbox in Lyx? ..
  I can of course input a latex code within lyx.. but it
  would be great if I could do it in a lyx way too so
  that I could also have the benefit of actually seeing
  to formula.

 _inside_ the math mode put all in braces { ... }
 no need for ERT
 
Inside math mode, just write
 
\mbox
 
This solution does not need ERT as well.
 
Paul
 
 I needed it also, and it works fine, thanks, but to see
 the box frame I used \fbox.

enable the amsmath button and then use \boxed{...}
inside the math mode, it is the better way

Herbert




Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-10-26 Thread Paul Smith
On 10/25/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I thought I'd add the stuff below to the wiki, but first I'd like to check
 that it's correct (since I haven't tried it myself).


 
 Question:
 How can I disallow LaTeX to linebreak an inlined math formula?
 (This is typically useful for formulas at the end of a line)

 Answer:
 You can put the formula inside an mbox to prevent LaTeX from
 splitting up the formula. The steps can be summarized as follows:

 1) Go to math mode (inline formula or display formula)
 2) Type \mbox and then a press carriage return or the spacebar
 3) The text \mbox disappear and a box appears
 4) Type the equation inside the box

 Note that if you'd like a frame around your equation, you can use fbox
 instead of mbox.
 -

Christian,

I think the text below is correct and appropiate.

Regards,

Paul

Question:
How can I disallow LaTeX to linebreak an inlined math formula?
(This is typically useful for formulas at the end of a line)

Answer:
You can put the formula inside an mbox to prevent LaTeX from
splitting up the formula. The steps can be summarized as follows:

1) Go to math mode (inline formula or display formula)
2) Type \mbox and then a press carriage return or the spacebar
3) The text \mbox disappears and a box appears
4) Select math mode
5) Type the equation inside the box

Alternatively to the above solution, you can type, inside math mode,
\{ and \}, respectively, before and after your formula.

Question:
How can I insert a frame around my equation?

1) Go to math mode (inline formula or display formula)
2) Type \boxed  and then a press carriage return or the spacebar
3) The text \boxed disappears and a framed box appears
4) Type the equation inside the box


Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-10-26 Thread Herbert Voss
ZAVARISE GIORGIO wrote:

>>Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Oggetto:  Re: Is this possible in lyx?
>>Data: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:14:54 +0100
>>A:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> 
> 
> 
>>On 10/25/05, Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>wrote:
>> > I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
>> > a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
>> > line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
>> > breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
>> > a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
>> > what about lyx? how can I perform an \mbox in Lyx? ..
>> > I can of course input a latex code within lyx.. but it
>> > would be great if I could do it in a "lyx" way too so
>> > that I could also have the benefit of actually seeing
>> > to formula.
>>
>> _inside_ the math mode put all in braces { ... }
>> no need for ERT
> 
>>Inside math mode, just write
> 
>>\mbox
> 
>>This solution does not need ERT as well.
> 
>>Paul
> 
> I needed it also, and it works fine, thanks, but to see
> the box frame I used \fbox.

enable the amsmath button and then use \boxed{...}
inside the math mode, it is the better way

Herbert




Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-10-26 Thread Paul Smith
On 10/25/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought I'd add the stuff below to the wiki, but first I'd like to check
> that it's correct (since I haven't tried it myself).
>
>
> 
> Question:
> How can I disallow LaTeX to linebreak an inlined math formula?
> (This is typically useful for formulas at the end of a line)
>
> Answer:
> You can put the formula inside an "mbox" to prevent LaTeX from
> splitting up the formula. The steps can be summarized as follows:
>
> 1) Go to math mode (inline formula or display formula)
> 2) Type \mbox and then a press carriage return or the spacebar
> 3) The text "\mbox" disappear and a box appears
> 4) Type the equation inside the box
>
> Note that if you'd like a frame around your equation, you can use "fbox"
> instead of "mbox".
> -

Christian,

I think the text below is correct and appropiate.

Regards,

Paul

Question:
How can I disallow LaTeX to linebreak an inlined math formula?
(This is typically useful for formulas at the end of a line)

Answer:
You can put the formula inside an "mbox" to prevent LaTeX from
splitting up the formula. The steps can be summarized as follows:

1) Go to math mode (inline formula or display formula)
2) Type \mbox and then a press carriage return or the spacebar
3) The text "\mbox" disappears and a box appears
4) Select math mode
5) Type the equation inside the box

Alternatively to the above solution, you can type, inside math mode,
\{ and \}, respectively, before and after your formula.

Question:
How can I insert a frame around my equation?

1) Go to math mode (inline formula or display formula)
2) Type \boxed  and then a press carriage return or the spacebar
3) The text "\boxed" disappears and a framed box appears
4) Type the equation inside the box


Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Helge Hafting

Jose Capco wrote:


Try writing your formula in LyX the normal way, then
putting \mbox{ in 
ERT to the left of it and } in ERT to the right of

it.

Paul
   



I just feared that.. so the answer to my question is
actually no but yes , oh well.. I guess there is no
other way. Thanks
 


There is currently no way to a apply a mbox in a lyxish way,
but at least the formula itself can be written the lyx way.

Currently, the lyx way would be to insert a minipage, but that
isn't exactly the same thing as minipages have a fixed width.

Helge Hafting


Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Herbert Voss
Jose Capco wrote:

 Dear List,
 
 I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
 a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
 line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
 breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
 a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
 what about lyx? how can I perform an \mbox in Lyx? ..
 I can of course input a latex code within lyx.. but it
 would be great if I could do it in a lyx way too so
 that I could also have the benefit of actually seeing
 to formula.

_inside_ the math mode put all in braces { ... }
no need for ERT

Herbert




Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Paul Smith
On 10/25/05, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
  a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
  line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
  breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
  a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
  what about lyx? how can I perform an \mbox in Lyx? ..
  I can of course input a latex code within lyx.. but it
  would be great if I could do it in a lyx way too so
  that I could also have the benefit of actually seeing
  to formula.

 _inside_ the math mode put all in braces { ... }
 no need for ERT

Inside math mode, just write

\mbox

This solution does not need ERT as well.

Paul


Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Jose Capco
--- Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 _inside_ the math mode put all in braces { ... }
 no need for ERT
 
 Herbert
 
 
 
Cool.. didnt know that.. but wait.. by { } braces ..
you didnt mean \{ .. because when I punch the { braces
in lyx I get \{ what you would get in LaTeX.. so how
to do the { instead of \{ braces in math mode?

Sincerely,
Jose Capco




__ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com


Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Jose Capco
 Cool.. didnt know that.. but wait.. by { } braces ..
 you didnt mean \{ .. because when I punch the {
 braces
 in lyx I get \{ what you would get in LaTeX.. so how
 to do the { instead of \{ braces in math mode?
 
 Sincerely,
 Jose Capco

Sorry.. I got the answer.. I type \{ in lyx to get {
.. thats cute.. And it also reduces my typing.. I dont
need the mboxes anymore. Thats the best solution!
Thanks.

Sincerely,
Jose Capco



__ 
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com


Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread ZAVARISE GIORGIO

Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto:Re: Is this possible in lyx?
Data:   Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:14:54 +0100
A:  lyx-users@lists.lyx.org





On 10/25/05, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
 a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
 line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
 breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
 a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
 what about lyx? how can I perform an \mbox in Lyx? ..
 I can of course input a latex code within lyx.. but it
 would be great if I could do it in a lyx way too so
 that I could also have the benefit of actually seeing
 to formula.

_inside_ the math mode put all in braces { ... }
no need for ERT



Inside math mode, just write



\mbox



This solution does not need ERT as well.



Paul


I needed it also, and it works fine, thanks, but to see 
the box frame I used \fbox.


Resume for dummies (I am the first one):
1) go to math mode (inline formula or display formula)
2) type \fbox and then a press carriage return or the 
spacebar

3) the text \fbox disappear and a framed box appears
4) type the equation there inside
5) eventually apply equation number

Hope this is useful, thanks to all

Giorgio Zavarise


Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread chr
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, ZAVARISE GIORGIO wrote:

I thought I'd add the stuff below to the wiki, but first I'd like to check 
that it's correct (since I haven't tried it myself).



Question:
How can I disallow LaTeX to linebreak an inlined math formula?
(This is typically useful for formulas at the end of a line)

Answer:
You can put the formula inside an mbox to prevent LaTeX from 
splitting up the formula. The steps can be summarized as follows:

1) Go to math mode (inline formula or display formula)
2) Type \mbox and then a press carriage return or the spacebar
3) The text \mbox disappear and a box appears
4) Type the equation inside the box

Note that if you'd like a frame around your equation, you can use fbox 
instead of mbox.
-


cheers
/Christian

-- 
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44   http://www.md.kth.se/~chr




Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Giorgio Zavarise

MY PROCEDURE FOR DUMMIES WAS WRONG, SORRY

The problem comes from the fact that within the box generated with the 
\fbox command you are back to the text environment, hence to type 
equations, once you are inside the box, you have to insert an online 
formula


HOW TO PUT A BOX AROUND AN EQUATION
Resume for dummies n. 2, hopefully the right one:

 1) go to math mode with the command INSERT -- MATH -- DISPLAY FORMULA
 2) type \fbox (visible box) and then a press carriage return or the 
spacebar

 3) the text \fbox disappear and a framed box appears
 4) put the cursor inside the box (WARNING, YOU ARE IN TEXT MODE NOW!!)
 5) go again to math mode with the command INSERT -- MATH -- INLINE 
FORMULA

 6) type the equation there inside
 7) eventually apply equation number as usual

As a comment,
1) the box reduces the height of the equation, I don't know why, but 
this seems to be a feature of Latex, not of Lyx
2) if you need the eqnarray environment within the box you are in 
troubles, it seems it does not work. A workaround is given by inserting 
a matrix from the math panel and then aligning the contents with 
EDIT--MATH--ALIGNEMENT-- WHAT YOU NEED


 Hope this is useful, thanks to all

 Giorgio Zavarise

Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Paul Smith
On 10/25/05, Giorgio Zavarise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 MY PROCEDURE FOR DUMMIES WAS WRONG, SORRY

 The problem comes from the fact that within the box generated with the
 \fbox command you are back to the text environment, hence to type
 equations, once you are inside the box, you have to insert an online
 formula

 HOW TO PUT A BOX AROUND AN EQUATION
 Resume for dummies n. 2, hopefully the right one:

   1) go to math mode with the command INSERT -- MATH -- DISPLAY FORMULA
   2) type \fbox (visible box) and then a press carriage return or the
 spacebar
   3) the text \fbox disappear and a framed box appears
   4) put the cursor inside the box (WARNING, YOU ARE IN TEXT MODE NOW!!)
   5) go again to math mode with the command INSERT -- MATH -- INLINE
 FORMULA
   6) type the equation there inside
   7) eventually apply equation number as usual

 As a comment,
 1) the box reduces the height of the equation, I don't know why, but
 this seems to be a feature of Latex, not of Lyx
 2) if you need the eqnarray environment within the box you are in
 troubles, it seems it does not work. A workaround is given by inserting
 a matrix from the math panel and then aligning the contents with
 EDIT--MATH--ALIGNEMENT-- WHAT YOU NEED

   Hope this is useful, thanks to all

I would add two different entries to the Wiki: one to answer the question

1. How can I disallow LaTeX to linebreak an inlined math formula?;

and the other one to answer the question:

2. How to put a box around an equation?.

Regarding the question 1, I would also include Herbert's solution.

Paul


Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Helge Hafting

Jose Capco wrote:


Try writing your formula in LyX the normal way, then
putting \mbox{ in 
ERT to the left of it and } in ERT to the right of

it.

Paul
   



I just feared that.. so the answer to my question is
actually no but yes , oh well.. I guess there is no
other way. Thanks
 


There is currently no way to a apply a mbox in a lyxish way,
but at least the formula itself can be written the lyx way.

Currently, the lyx way would be to insert a minipage, but that
isn't exactly the same thing as minipages have a fixed width.

Helge Hafting


Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Herbert Voss
Jose Capco wrote:

 Dear List,
 
 I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
 a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
 line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
 breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
 a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
 what about lyx? how can I perform an \mbox in Lyx? ..
 I can of course input a latex code within lyx.. but it
 would be great if I could do it in a lyx way too so
 that I could also have the benefit of actually seeing
 to formula.

_inside_ the math mode put all in braces { ... }
no need for ERT

Herbert




Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Paul Smith
On 10/25/05, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
  a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
  line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
  breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
  a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
  what about lyx? how can I perform an \mbox in Lyx? ..
  I can of course input a latex code within lyx.. but it
  would be great if I could do it in a lyx way too so
  that I could also have the benefit of actually seeing
  to formula.

 _inside_ the math mode put all in braces { ... }
 no need for ERT

Inside math mode, just write

\mbox

This solution does not need ERT as well.

Paul


Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Jose Capco
--- Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 _inside_ the math mode put all in braces { ... }
 no need for ERT
 
 Herbert
 
 
 
Cool.. didnt know that.. but wait.. by { } braces ..
you didnt mean \{ .. because when I punch the { braces
in lyx I get \{ what you would get in LaTeX.. so how
to do the { instead of \{ braces in math mode?

Sincerely,
Jose Capco




__ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com


Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Jose Capco
 Cool.. didnt know that.. but wait.. by { } braces ..
 you didnt mean \{ .. because when I punch the {
 braces
 in lyx I get \{ what you would get in LaTeX.. so how
 to do the { instead of \{ braces in math mode?
 
 Sincerely,
 Jose Capco

Sorry.. I got the answer.. I type \{ in lyx to get {
.. thats cute.. And it also reduces my typing.. I dont
need the mboxes anymore. Thats the best solution!
Thanks.

Sincerely,
Jose Capco



__ 
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com


Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread ZAVARISE GIORGIO

Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto:Re: Is this possible in lyx?
Data:   Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:14:54 +0100
A:  lyx-users@lists.lyx.org





On 10/25/05, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
 a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
 line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
 breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
 a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
 what about lyx? how can I perform an \mbox in Lyx? ..
 I can of course input a latex code within lyx.. but it
 would be great if I could do it in a lyx way too so
 that I could also have the benefit of actually seeing
 to formula.

_inside_ the math mode put all in braces { ... }
no need for ERT



Inside math mode, just write



\mbox



This solution does not need ERT as well.



Paul


I needed it also, and it works fine, thanks, but to see 
the box frame I used \fbox.


Resume for dummies (I am the first one):
1) go to math mode (inline formula or display formula)
2) type \fbox and then a press carriage return or the 
spacebar

3) the text \fbox disappear and a framed box appears
4) type the equation there inside
5) eventually apply equation number

Hope this is useful, thanks to all

Giorgio Zavarise


Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread chr
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, ZAVARISE GIORGIO wrote:

I thought I'd add the stuff below to the wiki, but first I'd like to check 
that it's correct (since I haven't tried it myself).



Question:
How can I disallow LaTeX to linebreak an inlined math formula?
(This is typically useful for formulas at the end of a line)

Answer:
You can put the formula inside an mbox to prevent LaTeX from 
splitting up the formula. The steps can be summarized as follows:

1) Go to math mode (inline formula or display formula)
2) Type \mbox and then a press carriage return or the spacebar
3) The text \mbox disappear and a box appears
4) Type the equation inside the box

Note that if you'd like a frame around your equation, you can use fbox 
instead of mbox.
-


cheers
/Christian

-- 
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44   http://www.md.kth.se/~chr




Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Giorgio Zavarise

MY PROCEDURE FOR DUMMIES WAS WRONG, SORRY

The problem comes from the fact that within the box generated with the 
\fbox command you are back to the text environment, hence to type 
equations, once you are inside the box, you have to insert an online 
formula


HOW TO PUT A BOX AROUND AN EQUATION
Resume for dummies n. 2, hopefully the right one:

 1) go to math mode with the command INSERT -- MATH -- DISPLAY FORMULA
 2) type \fbox (visible box) and then a press carriage return or the 
spacebar

 3) the text \fbox disappear and a framed box appears
 4) put the cursor inside the box (WARNING, YOU ARE IN TEXT MODE NOW!!)
 5) go again to math mode with the command INSERT -- MATH -- INLINE 
FORMULA

 6) type the equation there inside
 7) eventually apply equation number as usual

As a comment,
1) the box reduces the height of the equation, I don't know why, but 
this seems to be a feature of Latex, not of Lyx
2) if you need the eqnarray environment within the box you are in 
troubles, it seems it does not work. A workaround is given by inserting 
a matrix from the math panel and then aligning the contents with 
EDIT--MATH--ALIGNEMENT-- WHAT YOU NEED


 Hope this is useful, thanks to all

 Giorgio Zavarise

Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Paul Smith
On 10/25/05, Giorgio Zavarise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 MY PROCEDURE FOR DUMMIES WAS WRONG, SORRY

 The problem comes from the fact that within the box generated with the
 \fbox command you are back to the text environment, hence to type
 equations, once you are inside the box, you have to insert an online
 formula

 HOW TO PUT A BOX AROUND AN EQUATION
 Resume for dummies n. 2, hopefully the right one:

   1) go to math mode with the command INSERT -- MATH -- DISPLAY FORMULA
   2) type \fbox (visible box) and then a press carriage return or the
 spacebar
   3) the text \fbox disappear and a framed box appears
   4) put the cursor inside the box (WARNING, YOU ARE IN TEXT MODE NOW!!)
   5) go again to math mode with the command INSERT -- MATH -- INLINE
 FORMULA
   6) type the equation there inside
   7) eventually apply equation number as usual

 As a comment,
 1) the box reduces the height of the equation, I don't know why, but
 this seems to be a feature of Latex, not of Lyx
 2) if you need the eqnarray environment within the box you are in
 troubles, it seems it does not work. A workaround is given by inserting
 a matrix from the math panel and then aligning the contents with
 EDIT--MATH--ALIGNEMENT-- WHAT YOU NEED

   Hope this is useful, thanks to all

I would add two different entries to the Wiki: one to answer the question

1. How can I disallow LaTeX to linebreak an inlined math formula?;

and the other one to answer the question:

2. How to put a box around an equation?.

Regarding the question 1, I would also include Herbert's solution.

Paul


Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Helge Hafting

Jose Capco wrote:


Try writing your formula in LyX the normal way, then
putting \mbox{ in 
ERT to the left of it and } in ERT to the right of

it.

Paul
   



I just feared that.. so the answer to my question is
actually "no but yes" , oh well.. I guess there is no
other way. Thanks
 


There is currently no way to a apply a "mbox" in a lyxish way,
but at least the formula itself can be written the lyx way.

Currently, the "lyx way" would be to insert a minipage, but that
isn't exactly the same thing as minipages have a fixed width.

Helge Hafting


Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Herbert Voss
Jose Capco wrote:

> Dear List,
> 
> I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
> a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
> line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
> breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
> a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
> what about lyx? how can I perform an \mbox in Lyx? ..
> I can of course input a latex code within lyx.. but it
> would be great if I could do it in a "lyx" way too so
> that I could also have the benefit of actually seeing
> to formula.

_inside_ the math mode put all in braces { ... }
no need for ERT

Herbert




Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Paul Smith
On 10/25/05, Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
> > a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
> > line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
> > breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
> > a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
> > what about lyx? how can I perform an \mbox in Lyx? ..
> > I can of course input a latex code within lyx.. but it
> > would be great if I could do it in a "lyx" way too so
> > that I could also have the benefit of actually seeing
> > to formula.
>
> _inside_ the math mode put all in braces { ... }
> no need for ERT

Inside math mode, just write

\mbox

This solution does not need ERT as well.

Paul


Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Jose Capco
--- Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> _inside_ the math mode put all in braces { ... }
> no need for ERT
> 
> Herbert
> 
> 
> 
Cool.. didnt know that.. but wait.. by { } braces ..
you didnt mean \{ .. because when I punch the { braces
in lyx I get \{ what you would get in LaTeX.. so how
to do the { instead of \{ braces in math mode?

Sincerely,
Jose Capco




__ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com


Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Jose Capco
> Cool.. didnt know that.. but wait.. by { } braces ..
> you didnt mean \{ .. because when I punch the {
> braces
> in lyx I get \{ what you would get in LaTeX.. so how
> to do the { instead of \{ braces in math mode?
> 
> Sincerely,
> Jose Capco

Sorry.. I got the answer.. I type \{ in lyx to get {
.. thats cute.. And it also reduces my typing.. I dont
need the mboxes anymore. Thats the best solution!
Thanks.

Sincerely,
Jose Capco



__ 
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com


Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread ZAVARISE GIORGIO

Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oggetto:Re: Is this possible in lyx?
Data:   Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:14:54 +0100
A:  lyx-users@lists.lyx.org





On 10/25/05, Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
> a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
> line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
> breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
> a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
> what about lyx? how can I perform an \mbox in Lyx? ..
> I can of course input a latex code within lyx.. but it
> would be great if I could do it in a "lyx" way too so
> that I could also have the benefit of actually seeing
> to formula.

_inside_ the math mode put all in braces { ... }
no need for ERT



Inside math mode, just write



\mbox



This solution does not need ERT as well.



Paul


I needed it also, and it works fine, thanks, but to see 
the box frame I used \fbox.


Resume for dummies (I am the first one):
1) go to math mode (inline formula or display formula)
2) type \fbox and then a press carriage return or the 
spacebar

3) the text "\fbox" disappear and a framed box appears
4) type the equation there inside
5) eventually apply equation number

Hope this is useful, thanks to all

Giorgio Zavarise


Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread chr
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, ZAVARISE GIORGIO wrote:

I thought I'd add the stuff below to the wiki, but first I'd like to check 
that it's correct (since I haven't tried it myself).



Question:
How can I disallow LaTeX to linebreak an inlined math formula?
(This is typically useful for formulas at the end of a line)

Answer:
You can put the formula inside an "mbox" to prevent LaTeX from 
splitting up the formula. The steps can be summarized as follows:

1) Go to math mode (inline formula or display formula)
2) Type \mbox and then a press carriage return or the spacebar
3) The text "\mbox" disappear and a box appears
4) Type the equation inside the box

Note that if you'd like a frame around your equation, you can use "fbox" 
instead of "mbox".
-


cheers
/Christian

-- 
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44   http://www.md.kth.se/~chr




Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Giorgio Zavarise

MY PROCEDURE FOR DUMMIES WAS WRONG, SORRY

The problem comes from the fact that within the box generated with the 
\fbox command you are back to the text environment, hence to type 
equations, once you are inside the box, you have to insert an online 
formula


HOW TO PUT A BOX AROUND AN EQUATION
Resume for dummies n. 2, hopefully the right one:

 1) go to math mode with the command INSERT --> MATH --> DISPLAY FORMULA
 2) type \fbox (visible box) and then a press carriage return or the 
spacebar

 3) the text "\fbox" disappear and a framed box appears
 4) put the cursor inside the box (WARNING, YOU ARE IN TEXT MODE NOW!!)
 5) go again to math mode with the command INSERT --> MATH --> INLINE 
FORMULA

 6) type the equation there inside
 7) eventually apply equation number as usual

As a comment,
1) the box reduces the height of the equation, I don't know why, but 
this seems to be a feature of Latex, not of Lyx
2) if you need the eqnarray environment within the box you are in 
troubles, it seems it does not work. A workaround is given by inserting 
a matrix from the math panel and then aligning the contents with 
EDIT-->MATH-->ALIGNEMENT--> WHAT YOU NEED


 Hope this is useful, thanks to all

 Giorgio Zavarise

Re: Is this possible with lyx?

2005-10-25 Thread Paul Smith
On 10/25/05, Giorgio Zavarise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MY PROCEDURE FOR DUMMIES WAS WRONG, SORRY
>
> The problem comes from the fact that within the box generated with the
> \fbox command you are back to the text environment, hence to type
> equations, once you are inside the box, you have to insert an online
> formula
>
> HOW TO PUT A BOX AROUND AN EQUATION
> Resume for dummies n. 2, hopefully the right one:
>
>   1) go to math mode with the command INSERT --> MATH --> DISPLAY FORMULA
>   2) type \fbox (visible box) and then a press carriage return or the
> spacebar
>   3) the text "\fbox" disappear and a framed box appears
>   4) put the cursor inside the box (WARNING, YOU ARE IN TEXT MODE NOW!!)
>   5) go again to math mode with the command INSERT --> MATH --> INLINE
> FORMULA
>   6) type the equation there inside
>   7) eventually apply equation number as usual
>
> As a comment,
> 1) the box reduces the height of the equation, I don't know why, but
> this seems to be a feature of Latex, not of Lyx
> 2) if you need the eqnarray environment within the box you are in
> troubles, it seems it does not work. A workaround is given by inserting
> a matrix from the math panel and then aligning the contents with
> EDIT-->MATH-->ALIGNEMENT--> WHAT YOU NEED
>
>   Hope this is useful, thanks to all

I would add two different entries to the Wiki: one to answer the question

1. How can I disallow LaTeX to linebreak an inlined math formula?;

and the other one to answer the question:

2. How to put a box around an equation?.

Regarding the question 1, I would also include Herbert's solution.

Paul


Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-24 Thread Jose Capco
Dear List,

I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
what about lyx? how can I perform an \mbox in Lyx? ..
I can of course input a latex code within lyx.. but it
would be great if I could do it in a lyx way too so
that I could also have the benefit of actually seeing
to formula.

Sincerely,
Jose Capco




__ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com


Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-24 Thread Paul A. Rubin

Jose Capco wrote:

Dear List,

I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
what about lyx? how can I perform an \mbox in Lyx? ..
I can of course input a latex code within lyx.. but it
would be great if I could do it in a lyx way too so
that I could also have the benefit of actually seeing
to formula.

Sincerely,
Jose Capco




__ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com




Try writing your formula in LyX the normal way, then putting \mbox{ in 
ERT to the left of it and } in ERT to the right of it.


Paul




Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-24 Thread Jose Capco

 Try writing your formula in LyX the normal way, then
 putting \mbox{ in 
 ERT to the left of it and } in ERT to the right of
 it.
 
 Paul

I just feared that.. so the answer to my question is
actually no but yes , oh well.. I guess there is no
other way. Thanks

Sincerely,
Jose Capco



__ 
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com


Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-24 Thread Jose Capco
Dear List,

I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
what about lyx? how can I perform an \mbox in Lyx? ..
I can of course input a latex code within lyx.. but it
would be great if I could do it in a lyx way too so
that I could also have the benefit of actually seeing
to formula.

Sincerely,
Jose Capco




__ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com


Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-24 Thread Paul A. Rubin

Jose Capco wrote:

Dear List,

I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
what about lyx? how can I perform an \mbox in Lyx? ..
I can of course input a latex code within lyx.. but it
would be great if I could do it in a lyx way too so
that I could also have the benefit of actually seeing
to formula.

Sincerely,
Jose Capco




__ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com




Try writing your formula in LyX the normal way, then putting \mbox{ in 
ERT to the left of it and } in ERT to the right of it.


Paul




Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-24 Thread Jose Capco

 Try writing your formula in LyX the normal way, then
 putting \mbox{ in 
 ERT to the left of it and } in ERT to the right of
 it.
 
 Paul

I just feared that.. so the answer to my question is
actually no but yes , oh well.. I guess there is no
other way. Thanks

Sincerely,
Jose Capco



__ 
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com


Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-24 Thread Jose Capco
Dear List,

I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
what about lyx? how can I perform an \mbox in Lyx? ..
I can of course input a latex code within lyx.. but it
would be great if I could do it in a "lyx" way too so
that I could also have the benefit of actually seeing
to formula.

Sincerely,
Jose Capco




__ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com


Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-24 Thread Paul A. Rubin

Jose Capco wrote:

Dear List,

I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
what about lyx? how can I perform an \mbox in Lyx? ..
I can of course input a latex code within lyx.. but it
would be great if I could do it in a "lyx" way too so
that I could also have the benefit of actually seeing
to formula.

Sincerely,
Jose Capco




__ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com




Try writing your formula in LyX the normal way, then putting \mbox{ in 
ERT to the left of it and } in ERT to the right of it.


Paul




Re: Is this possible in lyx?

2005-10-24 Thread Jose Capco

> Try writing your formula in LyX the normal way, then
> putting \mbox{ in 
> ERT to the left of it and } in ERT to the right of
> it.
> 
> Paul

I just feared that.. so the answer to my question is
actually "no but yes" , oh well.. I guess there is no
other way. Thanks

Sincerely,
Jose Capco



__ 
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com


Spell as you type - possible in LyX

2003-08-02 Thread Janus Sandsgaard
Hi LyX-Users

Are there any way to use a kind of spell as you type / flyspell in LyX? 

-j

-- 
Janus Sandsgaard
http://janus.dk


Re: Spell as you type - possible in LyX

2003-08-02 Thread Matthew Graybosch
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 16:56, Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
 Hi LyX-Users
 
 Are there any way to use a kind of spell as you type / flyspell in
 LyX? 

I don't think it's implemented.

-- 
Matthew Graybosch
http://www.starbreaker.net
I am become root, the shatterer of kernels.



Spell as you type - possible in LyX

2003-08-02 Thread Janus Sandsgaard
Hi LyX-Users

Are there any way to use a kind of spell as you type / flyspell in LyX? 

-j

-- 
Janus Sandsgaard
http://janus.dk


Re: Spell as you type - possible in LyX

2003-08-02 Thread Matthew Graybosch
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 16:56, Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
 Hi LyX-Users
 
 Are there any way to use a kind of spell as you type / flyspell in
 LyX? 

I don't think it's implemented.

-- 
Matthew Graybosch
http://www.starbreaker.net
I am become root, the shatterer of kernels.



Spell as you type - possible in LyX

2003-08-02 Thread Janus Sandsgaard
Hi LyX-Users

Are there any way to use a kind of "spell as you type" / "flyspell" in LyX? 

-j

-- 
Janus Sandsgaard
http://janus.dk


Re: Spell as you type - possible in LyX

2003-08-02 Thread Matthew Graybosch
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 16:56, Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
> Hi LyX-Users
> 
> Are there any way to use a kind of "spell as you type" / "flyspell" in
> LyX? 

I don't think it's implemented.

-- 
Matthew Graybosch
http://www.starbreaker.net
"I am become root, the shatterer of kernels."



Splitting figure across 2 pages w/ caption on 1st page ... possible under LyX? ERT?

2001-07-25 Thread Gerald Cecil

Hi ,

maybe this is a LaTeX question ... but,

I need to split a figure across 2 pages ... panels a-d on 1st  e-g on next
pg. I'd like the caption to be under the 1st chunk (Figure X. This shows
... ) and then the next page to say  Figure X (continued)  without
incrementing the Figure counter etc.  Ideally, can this be done in LyX?  Or,
can someone point me to a source that explains how to do it with ERT?

Thanks. I have a 325+ page book in LyX  it works beautifully other than the
occasional xforms hiccup. Great work!

Gerald Cecil




Re: Splitting figure across 2 pages w/ caption on 1st page ... possible under LyX? ERT?

2001-07-25 Thread Herbert Voss

Gerald Cecil wrote:
 
 maybe this is a LaTeX question ... but,

anyway ... :-)

 I need to split a figure across 2 pages ... panels a-d on 1st  e-g on next
 pg. I'd like the caption to be under the 1st chunk (Figure X. This shows
 ... ) and then the next page to say  Figure X (continued)  without
 incrementing the Figure counter etc.  Ideally, can this be done in LyX?  Or,
 can someone point me to a source that explains how to do it with ERT?

use a nonfloat and in/decrease the counter by yourself. have a look at

http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/floats/nonFloat.html

where i had the same problem with tables. you can define your
own \myFigure. 

\begin{myFigure}{Figure X}
...
\end{myFigure}
\addtocounter{figure}{-1}
\begin{myFigure}{Figure X (continued)}
...
\end{myFigure}

all in tex(red)


Herbert

-- 
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/





Splitting figure across 2 pages w/ caption on 1st page ... possible under LyX? ERT?

2001-07-25 Thread Gerald Cecil

Hi ,

maybe this is a LaTeX question ... but,

I need to split a figure across 2 pages ... panels a-d on 1st  e-g on next
pg. I'd like the caption to be under the 1st chunk (Figure X. This shows
... ) and then the next page to say  Figure X (continued)  without
incrementing the Figure counter etc.  Ideally, can this be done in LyX?  Or,
can someone point me to a source that explains how to do it with ERT?

Thanks. I have a 325+ page book in LyX  it works beautifully other than the
occasional xforms hiccup. Great work!

Gerald Cecil




Re: Splitting figure across 2 pages w/ caption on 1st page ... possible under LyX? ERT?

2001-07-25 Thread Herbert Voss

Gerald Cecil wrote:
 
 maybe this is a LaTeX question ... but,

anyway ... :-)

 I need to split a figure across 2 pages ... panels a-d on 1st  e-g on next
 pg. I'd like the caption to be under the 1st chunk (Figure X. This shows
 ... ) and then the next page to say  Figure X (continued)  without
 incrementing the Figure counter etc.  Ideally, can this be done in LyX?  Or,
 can someone point me to a source that explains how to do it with ERT?

use a nonfloat and in/decrease the counter by yourself. have a look at

http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/floats/nonFloat.html

where i had the same problem with tables. you can define your
own \myFigure. 

\begin{myFigure}{Figure X}
...
\end{myFigure}
\addtocounter{figure}{-1}
\begin{myFigure}{Figure X (continued)}
...
\end{myFigure}

all in tex(red)


Herbert

-- 
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/





Splitting figure across 2 pages w/ caption on 1st page ... possible under LyX? ERT?

2001-07-25 Thread Gerald Cecil

Hi ,

maybe this is a LaTeX question ... but,

I need to split a figure across 2 pages ... panels a-d on 1st & e-g on next
pg. I'd like the caption to be under the 1st chunk (Figure X. This shows
... ) and then the next page to say  Figure X (continued)  without
incrementing the Figure counter etc.  Ideally, can this be done in LyX?  Or,
can someone point me to a source that explains how to do it with ERT?

Thanks. I have a 325+ page book in LyX & it works beautifully other than the
occasional xforms hiccup. Great work!

Gerald Cecil




Re: Splitting figure across 2 pages w/ caption on 1st page ... possible under LyX? ERT?

2001-07-25 Thread Herbert Voss

Gerald Cecil wrote:
> 
> maybe this is a LaTeX question ... but,

anyway ... :-)

> I need to split a figure across 2 pages ... panels a-d on 1st & e-g on next
> pg. I'd like the caption to be under the 1st chunk (Figure X. This shows
> ... ) and then the next page to say  Figure X (continued)  without
> incrementing the Figure counter etc.  Ideally, can this be done in LyX?  Or,
> can someone point me to a source that explains how to do it with ERT?

use a nonfloat and in/decrease the counter by yourself. have a look at

http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/floats/nonFloat.html

where i had the same problem with tables. you can define your
own \myFigure. 

\begin{myFigure}{Figure X}
...
\end{myFigure}
\addtocounter{figure}{-1}
\begin{myFigure}{Figure X (continued)}
...
\end{myFigure}

all in tex(red)


Herbert

-- 
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/