Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 09:06:59PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
 I agree. Andre, is there any chance that you will implement in-place
 editing of macro arguments ?

I guess we need a differentiation between simple macros which could be
edited in-place, and complicated.

What we have now would be for complicated macros.

The main problem for the simple macros is the cursor movement between
cells. If we have  \def\a#1#2#3#4{\stackrel{#4}{#2}\stackrel{#3}{#1} the
movement would feel really awkward (even worse than the current hopping I
believe). But I agree that for really simple structures in-place would be
better...

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 09:06:59PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
 I agree. Andre, is there any chance that you will implement in-place
 editing of macro arguments ?

I guess we need a differentiation between simple macros which could be
edited in-place, and complicated.

What we have now would be for complicated macros.

The main problem for the simple macros is the cursor movement between
cells. If we have  \def\a#1#2#3#4{\stackrel{#4}{#2}\stackrel{#3}{#1} the
movement would feel really awkward (even worse than the current hopping I
believe). But I agree that for really simple structures in-place would be
better...

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 09:06:59PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> I agree. Andre, is there any chance that you will implement "in-place"
> editing of macro arguments ?

I guess we need a differentiation between "simple" macros which could be
edited in-place, and "complicated".

What we have now would be for "complicated" macros.

The main problem for the simple macros is the cursor movement between
cells. If we have  \def\a#1#2#3#4{\stackrel{#4}{#2}\stackrel{#3}{#1} the
movement would feel really awkward (even worse than the current hopping I
believe). But I agree that for really simple structures in-place would be
better...

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-15 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:59:36PM +0100, Andreas Buening wrote:
 
 7. Same for user defined macro expansion. It's rather annoying when
moving the cursor through a big equation.

I agree. Andre, is there any chance that you will implement in-place
editing of macro arguments ?


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-15 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:59:36PM +0100, Andreas Buening wrote:
 
 7. Same for user defined macro expansion. It's rather annoying when
moving the cursor through a big equation.

I agree. Andre, is there any chance that you will implement in-place
editing of macro arguments ?


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-15 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:59:36PM +0100, Andreas Buening wrote:
> 
> 7. Same for user defined macro expansion. It's rather annoying when
>moving the cursor through a big equation.

I agree. Andre, is there any chance that you will implement "in-place"
editing of macro arguments ?


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
 Andreas == Andreas Buening [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

   Unfortunately, I get the same problem. It seems to be a rather
   fundemental one so you have to keep the old lyx1.2.3 :-(
  
  I guess, it's a rather trivial one. You just have to add a magic
 flag  and it will work. ;-)
 
 Unfortunately, this is not the case. This is related to some
 typeinfo C++ stuff (that actually works well on my system, but not
 in lyx. Who knows why ?) Which gcc are you using ?

Andreas 2.95.2.

 By the way, it does not seem to be on the top of the lyx's todo
 list.

Andreas What a surprise! ;-)

What you could try to do is ask on a gcc list, or a aix-related list.
This is unfortunately over my head. I will gladly apply any patch to
mak eit work, of course :)

JMarc


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
 Andreas == Andreas Buening [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

   Unfortunately, I get the same problem. It seems to be a rather
   fundemental one so you have to keep the old lyx1.2.3 :-(
  
  I guess, it's a rather trivial one. You just have to add a magic
 flag  and it will work. ;-)
 
 Unfortunately, this is not the case. This is related to some
 typeinfo C++ stuff (that actually works well on my system, but not
 in lyx. Who knows why ?) Which gcc are you using ?

Andreas 2.95.2.

 By the way, it does not seem to be on the top of the lyx's todo
 list.

Andreas What a surprise! ;-)

What you could try to do is ask on a gcc list, or a aix-related list.
This is unfortunately over my head. I will gladly apply any patch to
mak eit work, of course :)

JMarc


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andreas" == Andreas Buening <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> > > Unfortunately, I get the same problem. It seems to be a rather
>> > > fundemental one so you have to keep the "old" lyx1.2.3 :-(
>> > 
>> > I guess, it's a rather trivial one. You just have to add a magic
>> flag > and it will work. ;-)
>> 
>> Unfortunately, this is not the case. This is related to some
>> typeinfo C++ stuff (that actually works well on my system, but not
>> in lyx. Who knows why ?) Which gcc are you using ?

Andreas> 2.95.2.

>> By the way, it does not seem to be on the top of the lyx's todo
>> list.

Andreas> What a surprise! ;-)

What you could try to do is ask on a gcc list, or a aix-related list.
This is unfortunately over my head. I will gladly apply any patch to
mak eit work, of course :)

JMarc


Lots of problems

2003-03-11 Thread Andreas Buening
Hello!

I've just been trying lyx 1.3. It had lots of problems.

1. It's not possible to compile xforms 1.0 out of the box for Solaris
   and AIX systems. Could you kindly provide some precompiled binaries?

2. The compilation on AIX terminates with:

g++ -O2 -Wno-non-template-friend -ftemplate-depth-30 -s -o lyx BufferView.o 
BufferView_pimpl.o Bullet.o Chktex.o CutAndPaste.o DepTable.o FloatList.o Floating.o 
FuncStatus.o InsetList.o LColor.o LaTeX.o LaTeXFeatures.o LyXAction.o MenuBackend.o 
paragraph_funcs.o ParagraphList.o ParagraphParameters.o Spacing.o TextCache.o 
Thesaurus.o ToolbarDefaults.o boost.o boost-inst.o box.o buffer.o bufferlist.o 
bufferparams.o bufferview_funcs.o chset.o converter.o counters.o debug.o encoding.o 
exporter.o gettext.o factory.o funcrequest.o importer.o intl.o iterators.o kbmap.o 
kbsequence.o language.o lastfiles.o lengthcommon.o lyx_cb.o lyx_main.o lyx_sty.o 
lyxcursor.o lyxfont.o lyxfind.o lyxfunc.o lyxgluelength.o lyxlayout.o lyxlength.o 
lyxlex.o lyxlex_pimpl.o lyxrc.o lyxrow.o lyxserver.o lyxtextclass.o lyxtextclasslist.o 
lyxvc.o main.o paragraph.o paragraph_pimpl.o ispell.o pspell.o sgml.o tabular.o 
tabular-old.o tabular_funcs.o tex-accent.o tex-strings.o texrow.o text.o text2.o 
text3.o toc!
.o trans.o trans_mgr.o undo.o undo_funcs.o vc-backend.o version.o vspace.o  
-L/afs/mpa/common/pdsoft/lib mathed/.libs/libmathed.a insets/.libs/libinsets.a 
frontends/.libs/libfrontends.a -lflimage -L/afs/mpa/common/pdsoft/appl/libjpeg-6b/lib 
-ljpeg -lforms -lXpm graphics/.libs/libgraphics.a support/.libs/libsupport.a 
../boost/libs/regex/src/.libs/libboostregex.a 
../boost/libs/signals/src/.libs/libboostsignals.a ../intl/libintl.a -liconv -lSM -lICE 
-lc -lm -lX11
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: ControlDialogControlConnectBD::hide(void)
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: ControlDialogControlConnectBD::update(void)
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: ControlDialogControlConnectBD::show(void)
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: ControlDialogControlConnectBI::hide(void)
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: ControlDialogControlConnectBI::update(void)
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: ControlDialogControlConnectBI::show(void)
ld: 0711-345 Use the -bloadmap or -bnoquiet option to obtain more information.
collect2: ld returned 8 exit status
make[3]: *** [lyx] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/scratch/buening/lyx-1.3.0/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/scratch/buening/lyx-1.3.0/src'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/scratch/buening/lyx-1.3.0/src'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1


3. I want to have some standard key bindings like M-i l - insert-label
   independent of the language but lyx ignores my bindings in de_menus.bind
   (it reads the file but ignores the bindings). The german menu
   shows the M-i l after M_a_rke (Label) in the Einfügen (Insert) menu
   but it ignores it. M-i ever starts the Ans_i_cht (View) menu.

4. Some key bindings are unknown (I get an error if lyx is started) like
   insert-marginpar.

5. In math mode code like x \ne 0 is transformed to x\ne0 for LaTeX
   output which makes lyx basically unusable for me.

6. The new method to insert TeX code is rather annoying. I'd prefer the
   old behaviour where I edit the text directly without mouse clicking.

7. Same for user defined macro expansion. It's rather annoying when
   moving the cursor through a big equation.


Bye,
Andreas


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:59:36PM +0100, Andreas Buening wrote:
 5. In math mode code like x \ne 0 is transformed to x\ne0 for LaTeX
output which makes lyx basically unusable for me.

Why?

$x\ne0$ is LaTeX-wise equivalent to $x \ne 0$

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-11 Thread Andreas Buening
 On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:59:36PM +0100, Andreas Buening wrote:
  5. In math mode code like x \ne 0 is transformed to x\ne0 for LaTeX
 output which makes lyx basically unusable for me.
 
 Why?
 
 $x\ne0$ is LaTeX-wise equivalent to $x \ne 0$

Oops. Yes, you're right. It was a user defined macro that caused the error.
I was just confused by \ne0 (old lyx versions produce \ne 0). I didn't
know that it's correct latex.


Bye,
Andreas


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-11 Thread Andreas Buening
Nicolas Ferre wrote:
 Andreas Buening wrote:
  
  Hello!
  
  I've just been trying lyx 1.3. It had lots of problems.
  
  1. It's not possible to compile xforms 1.0 out of the box for Solaris
 and AIX systems. Could you kindly provide some precompiled binaries?
 
 I compiled xforms on aix5.1 without problem.

How? I had to use about dozens of make flags to get it working.


  
  2. The compilation on AIX terminates with:

[snip]

 Unfortunately, I get the same problem. It seems to be a rather
 fundemental one so you have to keep the old lyx1.2.3 :-(

I guess, it's a rather trivial one. You just have to add a magic flag
and it will work. ;-)


Bye,
Andreas


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 05:01:44PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
 I prefer LyX would write $x\ne 0$ or $x \ne 0$, as it is more human readable.

Feel free to fix this without breaking something.

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-11 Thread Andreas Buening
Nicolas Ferre wrote:
 Andreas Buening wrote:
  
  Nicolas Ferre wrote:

[snip]

   I compiled xforms on aix5.1 without problem.
  
  How? I had to use about dozens of make flags to get it working.
  
 
 Ooops, maybe you are right, maybe I downloaded xforms from:
 ftp://ncmir.ucsd.edu/pub/xforms/ibm-rs6000/
 But I don't remember if it's the source file or already the binaries.
 Anyway, I can send you my libforms.a

Finally, I was able to compile it myself but it's nice to know that there
are binaries. However, this is AIX 4. I don't know whether it makes
a difference.

[snip]

   Unfortunately, I get the same problem. It seems to be a rather
   fundemental one so you have to keep the old lyx1.2.3 :-(
  
  I guess, it's a rather trivial one. You just have to add a magic flag
  and it will work. ;-)
 
 Unfortunately, this is not the case. This is related to some typeinfo
 C++ stuff (that actually works well on my system, but not in lyx. Who
 knows why ?) Which gcc are you using ?

2.95.2.

 By the way, it does not seem to be on the top of the lyx's todo list.

What a surprise! ;-)


Bye,
Andreas


Lots of problems

2003-03-11 Thread Andreas Buening
Hello!

I've just been trying lyx 1.3. It had lots of problems.

1. It's not possible to compile xforms 1.0 out of the box for Solaris
   and AIX systems. Could you kindly provide some precompiled binaries?

2. The compilation on AIX terminates with:

g++ -O2 -Wno-non-template-friend -ftemplate-depth-30 -s -o lyx BufferView.o 
BufferView_pimpl.o Bullet.o Chktex.o CutAndPaste.o DepTable.o FloatList.o Floating.o 
FuncStatus.o InsetList.o LColor.o LaTeX.o LaTeXFeatures.o LyXAction.o MenuBackend.o 
paragraph_funcs.o ParagraphList.o ParagraphParameters.o Spacing.o TextCache.o 
Thesaurus.o ToolbarDefaults.o boost.o boost-inst.o box.o buffer.o bufferlist.o 
bufferparams.o bufferview_funcs.o chset.o converter.o counters.o debug.o encoding.o 
exporter.o gettext.o factory.o funcrequest.o importer.o intl.o iterators.o kbmap.o 
kbsequence.o language.o lastfiles.o lengthcommon.o lyx_cb.o lyx_main.o lyx_sty.o 
lyxcursor.o lyxfont.o lyxfind.o lyxfunc.o lyxgluelength.o lyxlayout.o lyxlength.o 
lyxlex.o lyxlex_pimpl.o lyxrc.o lyxrow.o lyxserver.o lyxtextclass.o lyxtextclasslist.o 
lyxvc.o main.o paragraph.o paragraph_pimpl.o ispell.o pspell.o sgml.o tabular.o 
tabular-old.o tabular_funcs.o tex-accent.o tex-strings.o texrow.o text.o text2.o 
text3.o toc!
.o trans.o trans_mgr.o undo.o undo_funcs.o vc-backend.o version.o vspace.o  
-L/afs/mpa/common/pdsoft/lib mathed/.libs/libmathed.a insets/.libs/libinsets.a 
frontends/.libs/libfrontends.a -lflimage -L/afs/mpa/common/pdsoft/appl/libjpeg-6b/lib 
-ljpeg -lforms -lXpm graphics/.libs/libgraphics.a support/.libs/libsupport.a 
../boost/libs/regex/src/.libs/libboostregex.a 
../boost/libs/signals/src/.libs/libboostsignals.a ../intl/libintl.a -liconv -lSM -lICE 
-lc -lm -lX11
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: ControlDialogControlConnectBD::hide(void)
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: ControlDialogControlConnectBD::update(void)
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: ControlDialogControlConnectBD::show(void)
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: ControlDialogControlConnectBI::hide(void)
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: ControlDialogControlConnectBI::update(void)
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: ControlDialogControlConnectBI::show(void)
ld: 0711-345 Use the -bloadmap or -bnoquiet option to obtain more information.
collect2: ld returned 8 exit status
make[3]: *** [lyx] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/scratch/buening/lyx-1.3.0/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/scratch/buening/lyx-1.3.0/src'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/scratch/buening/lyx-1.3.0/src'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1


3. I want to have some standard key bindings like M-i l - insert-label
   independent of the language but lyx ignores my bindings in de_menus.bind
   (it reads the file but ignores the bindings). The german menu
   shows the M-i l after M_a_rke (Label) in the Einfügen (Insert) menu
   but it ignores it. M-i ever starts the Ans_i_cht (View) menu.

4. Some key bindings are unknown (I get an error if lyx is started) like
   insert-marginpar.

5. In math mode code like x \ne 0 is transformed to x\ne0 for LaTeX
   output which makes lyx basically unusable for me.

6. The new method to insert TeX code is rather annoying. I'd prefer the
   old behaviour where I edit the text directly without mouse clicking.

7. Same for user defined macro expansion. It's rather annoying when
   moving the cursor through a big equation.


Bye,
Andreas


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:59:36PM +0100, Andreas Buening wrote:
 5. In math mode code like x \ne 0 is transformed to x\ne0 for LaTeX
output which makes lyx basically unusable for me.

Why?

$x\ne0$ is LaTeX-wise equivalent to $x \ne 0$

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-11 Thread Andreas Buening
 On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:59:36PM +0100, Andreas Buening wrote:
  5. In math mode code like x \ne 0 is transformed to x\ne0 for LaTeX
 output which makes lyx basically unusable for me.
 
 Why?
 
 $x\ne0$ is LaTeX-wise equivalent to $x \ne 0$

Oops. Yes, you're right. It was a user defined macro that caused the error.
I was just confused by \ne0 (old lyx versions produce \ne 0). I didn't
know that it's correct latex.


Bye,
Andreas


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-11 Thread Andreas Buening
Nicolas Ferre wrote:
 Andreas Buening wrote:
  
  Hello!
  
  I've just been trying lyx 1.3. It had lots of problems.
  
  1. It's not possible to compile xforms 1.0 out of the box for Solaris
 and AIX systems. Could you kindly provide some precompiled binaries?
 
 I compiled xforms on aix5.1 without problem.

How? I had to use about dozens of make flags to get it working.


  
  2. The compilation on AIX terminates with:

[snip]

 Unfortunately, I get the same problem. It seems to be a rather
 fundemental one so you have to keep the old lyx1.2.3 :-(

I guess, it's a rather trivial one. You just have to add a magic flag
and it will work. ;-)


Bye,
Andreas


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 05:01:44PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
 I prefer LyX would write $x\ne 0$ or $x \ne 0$, as it is more human readable.

Feel free to fix this without breaking something.

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-11 Thread Andreas Buening
Nicolas Ferre wrote:
 Andreas Buening wrote:
  
  Nicolas Ferre wrote:

[snip]

   I compiled xforms on aix5.1 without problem.
  
  How? I had to use about dozens of make flags to get it working.
  
 
 Ooops, maybe you are right, maybe I downloaded xforms from:
 ftp://ncmir.ucsd.edu/pub/xforms/ibm-rs6000/
 But I don't remember if it's the source file or already the binaries.
 Anyway, I can send you my libforms.a

Finally, I was able to compile it myself but it's nice to know that there
are binaries. However, this is AIX 4. I don't know whether it makes
a difference.

[snip]

   Unfortunately, I get the same problem. It seems to be a rather
   fundemental one so you have to keep the old lyx1.2.3 :-(
  
  I guess, it's a rather trivial one. You just have to add a magic flag
  and it will work. ;-)
 
 Unfortunately, this is not the case. This is related to some typeinfo
 C++ stuff (that actually works well on my system, but not in lyx. Who
 knows why ?) Which gcc are you using ?

2.95.2.

 By the way, it does not seem to be on the top of the lyx's todo list.

What a surprise! ;-)


Bye,
Andreas


Lots of problems

2003-03-11 Thread Andreas Buening
Hello!

I've just been trying lyx 1.3. It had lots of problems.

1. It's not possible to compile xforms 1.0 out of the box for Solaris
   and AIX systems. Could you kindly provide some precompiled binaries?

2. The compilation on AIX terminates with:

g++ -O2 -Wno-non-template-friend -ftemplate-depth-30 -s -o lyx BufferView.o 
BufferView_pimpl.o Bullet.o Chktex.o CutAndPaste.o DepTable.o FloatList.o Floating.o 
FuncStatus.o InsetList.o LColor.o LaTeX.o LaTeXFeatures.o LyXAction.o MenuBackend.o 
paragraph_funcs.o ParagraphList.o ParagraphParameters.o Spacing.o TextCache.o 
Thesaurus.o ToolbarDefaults.o boost.o boost-inst.o box.o buffer.o bufferlist.o 
bufferparams.o bufferview_funcs.o chset.o converter.o counters.o debug.o encoding.o 
exporter.o gettext.o factory.o funcrequest.o importer.o intl.o iterators.o kbmap.o 
kbsequence.o language.o lastfiles.o lengthcommon.o lyx_cb.o lyx_main.o lyx_sty.o 
lyxcursor.o lyxfont.o lyxfind.o lyxfunc.o lyxgluelength.o lyxlayout.o lyxlength.o 
lyxlex.o lyxlex_pimpl.o lyxrc.o lyxrow.o lyxserver.o lyxtextclass.o lyxtextclasslist.o 
lyxvc.o main.o paragraph.o paragraph_pimpl.o ispell.o pspell.o sgml.o tabular.o 
tabular-old.o tabular_funcs.o tex-accent.o tex-strings.o texrow.o text.o text2.o 
text3.o toc!
.o trans.o trans_mgr.o undo.o undo_funcs.o vc-backend.o version.o vspace.o  
-L/afs/mpa/common/pdsoft/lib mathed/.libs/libmathed.a insets/.libs/libinsets.a 
frontends/.libs/libfrontends.a -lflimage -L/afs/mpa/common/pdsoft/appl/libjpeg-6b/lib 
-ljpeg -lforms -lXpm graphics/.libs/libgraphics.a support/.libs/libsupport.a 
../boost/libs/regex/src/.libs/libboostregex.a 
../boost/libs/signals/src/.libs/libboostsignals.a ../intl/libintl.a -liconv -lSM -lICE 
-lc -lm -lX11
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: ControlDialog::hide(void)
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: ControlDialog::update(void)
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: ControlDialog::show(void)
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: ControlDialog::hide(void)
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: ControlDialog::update(void)
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: ControlDialog::show(void)
ld: 0711-345 Use the -bloadmap or -bnoquiet option to obtain more information.
collect2: ld returned 8 exit status
make[3]: *** [lyx] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/scratch/buening/lyx-1.3.0/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/scratch/buening/lyx-1.3.0/src'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/scratch/buening/lyx-1.3.0/src'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1


3. I want to have some standard key bindings like "M-i l" -> insert-label
   independent of the language but lyx ignores my bindings in de_menus.bind
   (it reads the file but ignores the bindings). The german menu
   shows the "M-i l" after "M_a_rke" (Label) in the "Einfügen" (Insert) menu
   but it ignores it. M-i ever starts the "Ans_i_cht" (View) menu.

4. Some key bindings are unknown (I get an error if lyx is started) like
   insert-marginpar.

5. In math mode code like "x \ne 0" is transformed to "x\ne0" for LaTeX
   output which makes lyx basically unusable for me.

6. The new method to insert TeX code is rather annoying. I'd prefer the
   old behaviour where I edit the text directly without mouse clicking.

7. Same for user defined macro expansion. It's rather annoying when
   moving the cursor through a big equation.


Bye,
Andreas


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:59:36PM +0100, Andreas Buening wrote:
> 5. In math mode code like "x \ne 0" is transformed to "x\ne0" for LaTeX
>output which makes lyx basically unusable for me.

Why?

$x\ne0$ is LaTeX-wise equivalent to $x \ne 0$

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-11 Thread Andreas Buening
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:59:36PM +0100, Andreas Buening wrote:
> > 5. In math mode code like "x \ne 0" is transformed to "x\ne0" for LaTeX
> >output which makes lyx basically unusable for me.
> 
> Why?
> 
> $x\ne0$ is LaTeX-wise equivalent to $x \ne 0$

Oops. Yes, you're right. It was a user defined macro that caused the error.
I was just confused by "\ne0" (old lyx versions produce "\ne 0"). I didn't
know that it's correct latex.


Bye,
Andreas


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-11 Thread Andreas Buening
Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Andreas Buening wrote:
> > 
> > Hello!
> > 
> > I've just been trying lyx 1.3. It had lots of problems.
> > 
> > 1. It's not possible to compile xforms 1.0 out of the box for Solaris
> >and AIX systems. Could you kindly provide some precompiled binaries?
> 
> I compiled xforms on aix5.1 without problem.

How? I had to use about dozens of make flags to get it working.


> > 
> > 2. The compilation on AIX terminates with:

[snip]

> Unfortunately, I get the same problem. It seems to be a rather
> fundemental one so you have to keep the "old" lyx1.2.3 :-(

I guess, it's a rather trivial one. You just have to add a magic flag
and it will work. ;-)


Bye,
Andreas


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 05:01:44PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> I prefer LyX would write $x\ne 0$ or $x \ne 0$, as it is more human readable.

Feel free to fix this without breaking something.

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)


Re: Lots of problems

2003-03-11 Thread Andreas Buening
Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Andreas Buening wrote:
> > 
> > Nicolas Ferre wrote:

[snip]

> > > I compiled xforms on aix5.1 without problem.
> > 
> > How? I had to use about dozens of make flags to get it working.
> > 
> 
> Ooops, maybe you are right, maybe I downloaded xforms from:
> ftp://ncmir.ucsd.edu/pub/xforms/ibm-rs6000/
> But I don't remember if it's the source file or already the binaries.
> Anyway, I can send you my libforms.a

Finally, I was able to compile it myself but it's nice to know that there
are binaries. However, this is AIX 4. I don't know whether it makes
a difference.

[snip]

> > > Unfortunately, I get the same problem. It seems to be a rather
> > > fundemental one so you have to keep the "old" lyx1.2.3 :-(
> > 
> > I guess, it's a rather trivial one. You just have to add a magic flag
> > and it will work. ;-)
> 
> Unfortunately, this is not the case. This is related to some typeinfo
> C++ stuff (that actually works well on my system, but not in lyx. Who
> knows why ?) Which gcc are you using ?

2.95.2.

> By the way, it does not seem to be on the top of the lyx's todo list.

What a surprise! ;-)


Bye,
Andreas