Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:55:48 +, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no, look for extarticle.layout as an example I can copy the original file stdlayouts.inc and add your definition of the proof environment and rename it. Then, how can we make the new and renamed stdlayouts.inc file specific to the extarticle class? Difficult? Not difficult, really. I have just managed to do that. Paul
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:33:35 +0100, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(1) can we have a tag for the above, so that we can see within LyX
that it is a proof?
yes, with this definition - see png
# Proof style definition
Style Proof
MarginStatic
LatexType Environment
LatexName proof
NextNoIndent 1
LeftMarginMMM
RightMargin MMM
TopSep0.5
ParSep0.5
BottomSep 0.5
Align Block
AlignPossible Block, Left, Right, Center
LabelType Static
LabelString Proof:
EndLabelType Filled_Box
Font
Shape Up
SizeNormal
EndFont
LabelFont
Series Bold
EndFont
Preamble
\usepackage[thmmarks]{ntheorem}
\theoremheaderfont{\itshape\bfseries}
\theorembodyfont{\normalfont}
\theoremstyle{nonumberplain}
\theoremsymbol{\rule{1ex}{1ex}}
\newtheorem{proof}{Proof}
Endpreamble
End
Herbert,
After each proof, the first paragraph is not indented as it should.
Any idea to get back the indentation by default?
Regards,
Paul
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:39:59 +, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After each proof, the first paragraph is not indented as it should. Any idea to get back the indentation by default? Oh, forget my question: I have just tried with article AMS and it does not do any indentation. So, this should be the expected behaviour. Paul
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
Paul Smith wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:55:48 +, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no, look for extarticle.layout as an example
I can copy the original file stdlayouts.inc and add your definition of
the proof environment and rename it. Then, how can we make the new and
renamed stdlayouts.inc file specific to the extarticle class?
Difficult?
Not difficult, really. I have just managed to do that.
I suppose, thet there is no other way here than
insert ERT \hspace*{\parindent} befor the first line
after a proof.
A problem of LyX, doesn't insert an empty line, which maybe
possible by the layout, but I forgot about it. -docs
Otherwise there maybe an option in ntheorem
Herbert
--
http://TeXnik.de/
http://PSTricks.de/
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf
http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?introduction=yes
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
Paul Smith wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:39:59 +, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After each proof, the first paragraph is not indented as it should. Any idea to get back the indentation by default? Oh, forget my question: I have just tried with article AMS and it does not do any indentation. So, this should be the expected behaviour. that is true anyway. Same for itemize, description, .. HErbert -- http://TeXnik.de/ http://PSTricks.de/ ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/ http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?introduction=yes
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:22:38 +0100, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose, thet there is no other way here than
insert ERT \hspace*{\parindent} befor the first line
after a proof.
An empty ERT + pressing the return key works as well.
Paul
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:55:48 +, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no, look for extarticle.layout as an example I can copy the original file stdlayouts.inc and add your definition of the proof environment and rename it. Then, how can we make the new and renamed stdlayouts.inc file specific to the extarticle class? Difficult? Not difficult, really. I have just managed to do that. Paul
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:33:35 +0100, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(1) can we have a tag for the above, so that we can see within LyX
that it is a proof?
yes, with this definition - see png
# Proof style definition
Style Proof
MarginStatic
LatexType Environment
LatexName proof
NextNoIndent 1
LeftMarginMMM
RightMargin MMM
TopSep0.5
ParSep0.5
BottomSep 0.5
Align Block
AlignPossible Block, Left, Right, Center
LabelType Static
LabelString Proof:
EndLabelType Filled_Box
Font
Shape Up
SizeNormal
EndFont
LabelFont
Series Bold
EndFont
Preamble
\usepackage[thmmarks]{ntheorem}
\theoremheaderfont{\itshape\bfseries}
\theorembodyfont{\normalfont}
\theoremstyle{nonumberplain}
\theoremsymbol{\rule{1ex}{1ex}}
\newtheorem{proof}{Proof}
Endpreamble
End
Herbert,
After each proof, the first paragraph is not indented as it should.
Any idea to get back the indentation by default?
Regards,
Paul
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:39:59 +, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After each proof, the first paragraph is not indented as it should. Any idea to get back the indentation by default? Oh, forget my question: I have just tried with article AMS and it does not do any indentation. So, this should be the expected behaviour. Paul
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
Paul Smith wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:55:48 +, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no, look for extarticle.layout as an example
I can copy the original file stdlayouts.inc and add your definition of
the proof environment and rename it. Then, how can we make the new and
renamed stdlayouts.inc file specific to the extarticle class?
Difficult?
Not difficult, really. I have just managed to do that.
I suppose, thet there is no other way here than
insert ERT \hspace*{\parindent} befor the first line
after a proof.
A problem of LyX, doesn't insert an empty line, which maybe
possible by the layout, but I forgot about it. -docs
Otherwise there maybe an option in ntheorem
Herbert
--
http://TeXnik.de/
http://PSTricks.de/
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf
http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?introduction=yes
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
Paul Smith wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:39:59 +, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After each proof, the first paragraph is not indented as it should. Any idea to get back the indentation by default? Oh, forget my question: I have just tried with article AMS and it does not do any indentation. So, this should be the expected behaviour. that is true anyway. Same for itemize, description, .. HErbert -- http://TeXnik.de/ http://PSTricks.de/ ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/ http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?introduction=yes
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:22:38 +0100, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose, thet there is no other way here than
insert ERT \hspace*{\parindent} befor the first line
after a proof.
An empty ERT + pressing the return key works as well.
Paul
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:55:48 +, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > no, look for extarticle.layout as an example > > I can copy the original file stdlayouts.inc and add your definition of > the proof environment and rename it. Then, how can we make the new and > renamed stdlayouts.inc file specific to the extarticle class? > Difficult? Not difficult, really. I have just managed to do that. Paul
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:33:35 +0100, Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (1) can we have a tag for the above, so that we can see within LyX
> > that it is a proof?
>
> yes, with this definition -> see png
>
> # Proof style definition
> Style Proof
>MarginStatic
>LatexType Environment
>LatexName proof
>NextNoIndent 1
>LeftMarginMMM
>RightMargin MMM
>TopSep0.5
>ParSep0.5
>BottomSep 0.5
>Align Block
>AlignPossible Block, Left, Right, Center
>LabelType Static
>LabelString "Proof: "
>EndLabelType Filled_Box
>Font
> Shape Up
> SizeNormal
>EndFont
>LabelFont
> Series Bold
>EndFont
>Preamble
> \usepackage[thmmarks]{ntheorem}
> \theoremheaderfont{\itshape\bfseries}
> \theorembodyfont{\normalfont}
> \theoremstyle{nonumberplain}
> \theoremsymbol{\rule{1ex}{1ex}}
> \newtheorem{proof}{Proof}
>Endpreamble
> End
Herbert,
After each proof, the first paragraph is not indented as it should.
Any idea to get back the indentation by default?
Regards,
Paul
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:39:59 +, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After each proof, the first paragraph is not indented as it should. > Any idea to get back the indentation by default? Oh, forget my question: I have just tried with article AMS and it does not do any indentation. So, this should be the expected behaviour. Paul
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
Paul Smith wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:55:48 +, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
no, look for extarticle.layout as an example
I can copy the original file stdlayouts.inc and add your definition of
the proof environment and rename it. Then, how can we make the new and
renamed stdlayouts.inc file specific to the extarticle class?
Difficult?
Not difficult, really. I have just managed to do that.
I suppose, thet there is no other way here than
insert ERT \hspace*{\parindent} befor the first line
after a proof.
A problem of LyX, doesn't insert an empty line, which maybe
possible by the layout, but I forgot about it. ->docs
Otherwise there maybe an option in ntheorem
Herbert
--
http://TeXnik.de/
http://PSTricks.de/
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf
http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?introduction=yes
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
Paul Smith wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:39:59 +, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After each proof, the first paragraph is not indented as it should. Any idea to get back the indentation by default? Oh, forget my question: I have just tried with article AMS and it does not do any indentation. So, this should be the expected behaviour. that is true anyway. Same for itemize, description, .. HErbert -- http://TeXnik.de/ http://PSTricks.de/ ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/ http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?introduction=yes
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:22:38 +0100, Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suppose, thet there is no other way here than
> insert ERT \hspace*{\parindent} befor the first line
> after a proof.
An empty ERT + pressing the return key works as well.
Paul
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All
Before proceeding, please have a look at my attached example. LyX
converts the proof to LaTeX as follows:
\begin{proof}
This is my short proof.
\end{proof}
However, due to a bug in the ntheorem package, the end-mark symbol
does not appear; one needs to delete the empty lines between This is
my short proof.. Is it possible to instruct LyX to automatically
delete those lines?
put the following in ~/.lyx/layouts/stdlayouts.inc
# Proof style definition
Style Proof
MarginStatic
LatexType Environment
LatexName proof
NextNoIndent 1
LeftMarginMMM
RightMargin MMM
TopSep0.5
ParSep0.5
BottomSep 0.5
Align Block
AlignPossible Block, Left, Right, Center
LabelType No_Label
Preamble
\usepackage[thmmarks]{ntheorem}
\theoremheaderfont{\itshape\bfseries}
\theorembodyfont{\normalfont}
\theoremstyle{nonumberplain}
\theoremsymbol{\rule{1ex}{1ex}}
\newtheorem{proof}{Proof}
Endpreamble
End
then restart LyX and you can choose Proof from the
layout menu and no additional definitions in the preamble
are needed
Herbert
--
http://TeXnik.de/
http://PSTricks.de/
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf
http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?introduction=yes
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
Paul Smith wrote:
(1) can we have a tag for the above, so that we can see within LyX
that it is a proof?
yes, with this definition - see png
# Proof style definition
Style Proof
MarginStatic
LatexType Environment
LatexName proof
NextNoIndent 1
LeftMarginMMM
RightMargin MMM
TopSep0.5
ParSep0.5
BottomSep 0.5
Align Block
AlignPossible Block, Left, Right, Center
LabelType Static
LabelString Proof:
EndLabelType Filled_Box
Font
Shape Up
SizeNormal
EndFont
LabelFont
Series Bold
EndFont
Preamble
\usepackage[thmmarks]{ntheorem}
\theoremheaderfont{\itshape\bfseries}
\theorembodyfont{\normalfont}
\theoremstyle{nonumberplain}
\theoremsymbol{\rule{1ex}{1ex}}
\newtheorem{proof}{Proof}
Endpreamble
End
(2) does this solution conflict with other classes when I use LyX to
work with other documents?
yes, when they also uses ntheorem, then there maybe a
package clash. You can create your own layout class,
then there is no problem.
Herbert
--
http://TeXnik.de/
http://PSTricks.de/
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf
http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?introduction=yes
inline: proof.png
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:33:35 +0100, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (1) can we have a tag for the above, so that we can see within LyX that it is a proof? yes, with this definition - see png Very nice! Thanks, Herbert. (2) does this solution conflict with other classes when I use LyX to work with other documents? yes, when they also uses ntheorem, then there maybe a package clash. You can create your own layout class, then there is no problem. Is that difficult? Paul
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
Paul Smith wrote: yes, when they also uses ntheorem, then there maybe a package clash. You can create your own layout class, then there is no problem. Is that difficult? no, look for extarticle.layout as an example Herbert -- http://TeXnik.de/ http://PSTricks.de/ ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/ http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?introduction=yes
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:24:57 +0100, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is that difficult? no, look for extarticle.layout as an example Herbert, I can copy the original file stdlayouts.inc and add your definition of the proof environment and rename it. Then, how can we make the new and renamed stdlayouts.inc file specific to the extarticle class? Difficult? Paul
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All
Before proceeding, please have a look at my attached example. LyX
converts the proof to LaTeX as follows:
\begin{proof}
This is my short proof.
\end{proof}
However, due to a bug in the ntheorem package, the end-mark symbol
does not appear; one needs to delete the empty lines between This is
my short proof.. Is it possible to instruct LyX to automatically
delete those lines?
put the following in ~/.lyx/layouts/stdlayouts.inc
# Proof style definition
Style Proof
MarginStatic
LatexType Environment
LatexName proof
NextNoIndent 1
LeftMarginMMM
RightMargin MMM
TopSep0.5
ParSep0.5
BottomSep 0.5
Align Block
AlignPossible Block, Left, Right, Center
LabelType No_Label
Preamble
\usepackage[thmmarks]{ntheorem}
\theoremheaderfont{\itshape\bfseries}
\theorembodyfont{\normalfont}
\theoremstyle{nonumberplain}
\theoremsymbol{\rule{1ex}{1ex}}
\newtheorem{proof}{Proof}
Endpreamble
End
then restart LyX and you can choose Proof from the
layout menu and no additional definitions in the preamble
are needed
Herbert
--
http://TeXnik.de/
http://PSTricks.de/
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf
http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?introduction=yes
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
Paul Smith wrote:
(1) can we have a tag for the above, so that we can see within LyX
that it is a proof?
yes, with this definition - see png
# Proof style definition
Style Proof
MarginStatic
LatexType Environment
LatexName proof
NextNoIndent 1
LeftMarginMMM
RightMargin MMM
TopSep0.5
ParSep0.5
BottomSep 0.5
Align Block
AlignPossible Block, Left, Right, Center
LabelType Static
LabelString Proof:
EndLabelType Filled_Box
Font
Shape Up
SizeNormal
EndFont
LabelFont
Series Bold
EndFont
Preamble
\usepackage[thmmarks]{ntheorem}
\theoremheaderfont{\itshape\bfseries}
\theorembodyfont{\normalfont}
\theoremstyle{nonumberplain}
\theoremsymbol{\rule{1ex}{1ex}}
\newtheorem{proof}{Proof}
Endpreamble
End
(2) does this solution conflict with other classes when I use LyX to
work with other documents?
yes, when they also uses ntheorem, then there maybe a
package clash. You can create your own layout class,
then there is no problem.
Herbert
--
http://TeXnik.de/
http://PSTricks.de/
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf
http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?introduction=yes
inline: proof.png
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:33:35 +0100, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (1) can we have a tag for the above, so that we can see within LyX that it is a proof? yes, with this definition - see png Very nice! Thanks, Herbert. (2) does this solution conflict with other classes when I use LyX to work with other documents? yes, when they also uses ntheorem, then there maybe a package clash. You can create your own layout class, then there is no problem. Is that difficult? Paul
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
Paul Smith wrote: yes, when they also uses ntheorem, then there maybe a package clash. You can create your own layout class, then there is no problem. Is that difficult? no, look for extarticle.layout as an example Herbert -- http://TeXnik.de/ http://PSTricks.de/ ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/ http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?introduction=yes
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:24:57 +0100, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is that difficult? no, look for extarticle.layout as an example Herbert, I can copy the original file stdlayouts.inc and add your definition of the proof environment and rename it. Then, how can we make the new and renamed stdlayouts.inc file specific to the extarticle class? Difficult? Paul
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All
Before proceeding, please have a look at my attached example. LyX
converts the proof to LaTeX as follows:
\begin{proof}
This is my short proof.
\end{proof}
However, due to a bug in the ntheorem package, the end-mark symbol
does not appear; one needs to delete the empty lines between "This is
my short proof.". Is it possible to instruct LyX to automatically
delete those lines?
put the following in ~/.lyx/layouts/stdlayouts.inc
# Proof style definition
Style Proof
MarginStatic
LatexType Environment
LatexName proof
NextNoIndent 1
LeftMarginMMM
RightMargin MMM
TopSep0.5
ParSep0.5
BottomSep 0.5
Align Block
AlignPossible Block, Left, Right, Center
LabelType No_Label
Preamble
\usepackage[thmmarks]{ntheorem}
\theoremheaderfont{\itshape\bfseries}
\theorembodyfont{\normalfont}
\theoremstyle{nonumberplain}
\theoremsymbol{\rule{1ex}{1ex}}
\newtheorem{proof}{Proof}
Endpreamble
End
then restart LyX and you can choose Proof from the
layout menu and no additional definitions in the preamble
are needed
Herbert
--
http://TeXnik.de/
http://PSTricks.de/
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf
http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?introduction=yes
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
Paul Smith wrote:
(1) can we have a tag for the above, so that we can see within LyX
that it is a proof?
yes, with this definition -> see png
# Proof style definition
Style Proof
MarginStatic
LatexType Environment
LatexName proof
NextNoIndent 1
LeftMarginMMM
RightMargin MMM
TopSep0.5
ParSep0.5
BottomSep 0.5
Align Block
AlignPossible Block, Left, Right, Center
LabelType Static
LabelString "Proof: "
EndLabelType Filled_Box
Font
Shape Up
SizeNormal
EndFont
LabelFont
Series Bold
EndFont
Preamble
\usepackage[thmmarks]{ntheorem}
\theoremheaderfont{\itshape\bfseries}
\theorembodyfont{\normalfont}
\theoremstyle{nonumberplain}
\theoremsymbol{\rule{1ex}{1ex}}
\newtheorem{proof}{Proof}
Endpreamble
End
(2) does this solution conflict with other classes when I use LyX to
work with other documents?
yes, when they also uses ntheorem, then there maybe a
package clash. You can create your own layout class,
then there is no problem.
Herbert
--
http://TeXnik.de/
http://PSTricks.de/
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf
http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?introduction=yes
<>
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:33:35 +0100, Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (1) can we have a tag for the above, so that we can see within LyX > > that it is a proof? > > yes, with this definition -> see png Very nice! Thanks, Herbert. > > (2) does this solution conflict with other classes when I use LyX to > > work with other documents? > > yes, when they also uses ntheorem, then there maybe a > package clash. You can create your own layout class, > then there is no problem. Is that difficult? Paul
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
Paul Smith wrote: yes, when they also uses ntheorem, then there maybe a package clash. You can create your own layout class, then there is no problem. Is that difficult? no, look for extarticle.layout as an example Herbert -- http://TeXnik.de/ http://PSTricks.de/ ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/ http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?introduction=yes
Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:24:57 +0100, Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is that difficult? > > no, look for extarticle.layout as an example Herbert, I can copy the original file stdlayouts.inc and add your definition of the proof environment and rename it. Then, how can we make the new and renamed stdlayouts.inc file specific to the extarticle class? Difficult? Paul
