Re: literature incomplete in pdf
thank you both a lot somehow i am not able (neither any of my more experienced lyx friends to turn my dissertation into a biblatex. it gives always multiple errors (i tried many times)... T1 inputenc error..(?) that is why i wondered if there was another (nonpainful) way Best regards Margret 2015-05-11 18:07 GMT+02:00 Johannes Böttcher johannesbottc...@gmail.com: On 05/11/2015 05:44 PM, Margret Mueller wrote: I use bibtex (changing to biblatex for some reason gives multiple errors we still work on it) apsr and natbib however the problem is that - in newspaper entries: the publication and the exact date (month day) are not displayed - in working papers the institution is not displayed - and any unicode signs in the literature result in error messages but i can live with manually cleaning the literature of any special letters Im looking forward to any hint as I am not able to find a solution to this in the last months Hi, it is quite possible, that the bibliography style you are using simply doesn't know the fields and entries you have defined, and every field unknown is ignored. For example, non of the bst styles i know have a defined date field, but all just support a year entry. Please consider the following example: %% \documentclass{article} \begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib} @bok{nobook, author={maggie}, title={the title}, } @misc{entry, date={2015-05-11}, author={maggie}, titel={not title, but titel}, } \end{filecontents} \begin{document} \nocite{*} \bibliographystyle{plain} \bibliography{\jobname} \end{document} %% Making biblatex work might be a fruitful endeavour, as hacking bst-styles is a pain. Best regards Johannes -- __ Margret Mueller PhD Student Political Communication FU Berlin 0049 176 842 787 22
Re: literature incomplete in pdf
On 05/12/2015 07:48 PM, Margret Mueller wrote: thank you both a lot somehow i am not able (neither any of my more experienced lyx friends to turn my dissertation into a biblatex. it gives always multiple errors (i tried many times)... T1 inputenc error..(?) that is why i wondered if there was another (nonpainful) way Best regards Margret 2015-05-11 18:07 GMT+02:00 Johannes Böttcher johannesbottc...@gmail.com: On 05/11/2015 05:44 PM, Margret Mueller wrote: I use bibtex (changing to biblatex for some reason gives multiple errors we still work on it) apsr and natbib however the problem is that - in newspaper entries: the publication and the exact date (month day) are not displayed - in working papers the institution is not displayed - and any unicode signs in the literature result in error messages but i can live with manually cleaning the literature of any special letters Im looking forward to any hint as I am not able to find a solution to this in the last months Hi, it is quite possible, that the bibliography style you are using simply doesn't know the fields and entries you have defined, and every field unknown is ignored. For example, non of the bst styles i know have a defined date field, but all just support a year entry. Please consider the following example: %% \documentclass{article} \begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib} @bok{nobook, author={maggie}, title={the title}, } @misc{entry, date={2015-05-11}, author={maggie}, titel={not title, but titel}, } \end{filecontents} \begin{document} \nocite{*} \bibliographystyle{plain} \bibliography{\jobname} \end{document} %% Making biblatex work might be a fruitful endeavour, as hacking bst-styles is a pain. Best regards Johannes The real error messgae would be better. For example, inputenc doesn't know the option T1, but package fontnec does. I guess this is a typo, though. It is also possible, that you have characters in your bibliography database, that are not known for your current encoding and need to be defined first. There is a pretty simple algorithm to limit the reasson to a very small area, called *creating a minimal working example* [1]. That is something, in my opinion, best done down at the pure LaTeX level, as LyX can and its extra stuff can be quite confusing and distracting. Once we have a bit of actual code producing the error, i am sure we can find a solution. Johannes [1] http://www.dickimaw-books.com/latex/minexample/html/
Re: literature incomplete in pdf
thank you both a lot somehow i am not able (neither any of my more experienced lyx friends to turn my dissertation into a biblatex. it gives always multiple errors (i tried many times)... T1 inputenc error..(?) that is why i wondered if there was another (nonpainful) way Best regards Margret 2015-05-11 18:07 GMT+02:00 Johannes Böttcher johannesbottc...@gmail.com: On 05/11/2015 05:44 PM, Margret Mueller wrote: I use bibtex (changing to biblatex for some reason gives multiple errors we still work on it) apsr and natbib however the problem is that - in newspaper entries: the publication and the exact date (month day) are not displayed - in working papers the institution is not displayed - and any unicode signs in the literature result in error messages but i can live with manually cleaning the literature of any special letters Im looking forward to any hint as I am not able to find a solution to this in the last months Hi, it is quite possible, that the bibliography style you are using simply doesn't know the fields and entries you have defined, and every field unknown is ignored. For example, non of the bst styles i know have a defined date field, but all just support a year entry. Please consider the following example: %% \documentclass{article} \begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib} @bok{nobook, author={maggie}, title={the title}, } @misc{entry, date={2015-05-11}, author={maggie}, titel={not title, but titel}, } \end{filecontents} \begin{document} \nocite{*} \bibliographystyle{plain} \bibliography{\jobname} \end{document} %% Making biblatex work might be a fruitful endeavour, as hacking bst-styles is a pain. Best regards Johannes -- __ Margret Mueller PhD Student Political Communication FU Berlin 0049 176 842 787 22
Re: literature incomplete in pdf
On 05/12/2015 07:48 PM, Margret Mueller wrote: thank you both a lot somehow i am not able (neither any of my more experienced lyx friends to turn my dissertation into a biblatex. it gives always multiple errors (i tried many times)... T1 inputenc error..(?) that is why i wondered if there was another (nonpainful) way Best regards Margret 2015-05-11 18:07 GMT+02:00 Johannes Böttcher johannesbottc...@gmail.com: On 05/11/2015 05:44 PM, Margret Mueller wrote: I use bibtex (changing to biblatex for some reason gives multiple errors we still work on it) apsr and natbib however the problem is that - in newspaper entries: the publication and the exact date (month day) are not displayed - in working papers the institution is not displayed - and any unicode signs in the literature result in error messages but i can live with manually cleaning the literature of any special letters Im looking forward to any hint as I am not able to find a solution to this in the last months Hi, it is quite possible, that the bibliography style you are using simply doesn't know the fields and entries you have defined, and every field unknown is ignored. For example, non of the bst styles i know have a defined date field, but all just support a year entry. Please consider the following example: %% \documentclass{article} \begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib} @bok{nobook, author={maggie}, title={the title}, } @misc{entry, date={2015-05-11}, author={maggie}, titel={not title, but titel}, } \end{filecontents} \begin{document} \nocite{*} \bibliographystyle{plain} \bibliography{\jobname} \end{document} %% Making biblatex work might be a fruitful endeavour, as hacking bst-styles is a pain. Best regards Johannes The real error messgae would be better. For example, inputenc doesn't know the option T1, but package fontnec does. I guess this is a typo, though. It is also possible, that you have characters in your bibliography database, that are not known for your current encoding and need to be defined first. There is a pretty simple algorithm to limit the reasson to a very small area, called *creating a minimal working example* [1]. That is something, in my opinion, best done down at the pure LaTeX level, as LyX can and its extra stuff can be quite confusing and distracting. Once we have a bit of actual code producing the error, i am sure we can find a solution. Johannes [1] http://www.dickimaw-books.com/latex/minexample/html/
Re: literature incomplete in pdf
thank you both a lot somehow i am not able (neither any of my more experienced lyx friends to turn my dissertation into a biblatex. it gives always multiple errors (i tried many times)... T1 inputenc error..(?) that is why i wondered if there was another (nonpainful) way Best regards Margret 2015-05-11 18:07 GMT+02:00 Johannes Böttcher: > > > On 05/11/2015 05:44 PM, Margret Mueller wrote: > > >> I use bibtex (changing to biblatex for some reason gives multiple errors >> we >> still work on it) >> apsr and natbib >> >> however the problem is that >> - in newspaper entries: the publication and the exact date (month day) are >> not displayed >> - in working papers the institution is not displayed >> - and any unicode signs in the literature result in error messages but i >> can live with manually "cleaning" the literature of any "special" letters >> >> Im looking forward to any hint as I am not able to find a solution to this >> in the last months >> > > > Hi, > > it is quite possible, that the bibliography style you are using simply > doesn't know the fields and entries you have defined, and every field > unknown is ignored. For example, non of the bst styles i know have a > defined date field, but all just support a year entry. > > > Please consider the following example: > %% > \documentclass{article} > \begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib} > @bok{nobook, > author={maggie}, > title={the title}, > } > @misc{entry, > date={2015-05-11}, > author={maggie}, > titel={not title, but titel}, > } > \end{filecontents} > \begin{document} > \nocite{*} > \bibliographystyle{plain} > \bibliography{\jobname} > \end{document} > %% > > > Making biblatex work might be a fruitful endeavour, as hacking bst-styles > is a pain. > > > Best regards > Johannes > > -- __ Margret Mueller PhD Student Political Communication FU Berlin 0049 176 842 787 22
Re: literature incomplete in pdf
On 05/12/2015 07:48 PM, Margret Mueller wrote: thank you both a lot somehow i am not able (neither any of my more experienced lyx friends to turn my dissertation into a biblatex. it gives always multiple errors (i tried many times)... T1 inputenc error..(?) that is why i wondered if there was another (nonpainful) way Best regards Margret 2015-05-11 18:07 GMT+02:00 Johannes Böttcher: On 05/11/2015 05:44 PM, Margret Mueller wrote: I use bibtex (changing to biblatex for some reason gives multiple errors we still work on it) apsr and natbib however the problem is that - in newspaper entries: the publication and the exact date (month day) are not displayed - in working papers the institution is not displayed - and any unicode signs in the literature result in error messages but i can live with manually "cleaning" the literature of any "special" letters Im looking forward to any hint as I am not able to find a solution to this in the last months Hi, it is quite possible, that the bibliography style you are using simply doesn't know the fields and entries you have defined, and every field unknown is ignored. For example, non of the bst styles i know have a defined date field, but all just support a year entry. Please consider the following example: %% \documentclass{article} \begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib} @bok{nobook, author={maggie}, title={the title}, } @misc{entry, date={2015-05-11}, author={maggie}, titel={not title, but titel}, } \end{filecontents} \begin{document} \nocite{*} \bibliographystyle{plain} \bibliography{\jobname} \end{document} %% Making biblatex work might be a fruitful endeavour, as hacking bst-styles is a pain. Best regards Johannes The real error messgae would be better. For example, inputenc doesn't know the option T1, but package fontnec does. I guess this is a typo, though. It is also possible, that you have characters in your bibliography database, that are not known for your current encoding and need to be defined first. There is a pretty simple algorithm to limit the reasson to a very small area, called *creating a minimal working example* [1]. That is something, in my opinion, best done down at the pure LaTeX level, as LyX can and its extra stuff can be quite confusing and distracting. Once we have a bit of actual code producing the error, i am sure we can find a solution. Johannes [1] http://www.dickimaw-books.com/latex/minexample/html/
Re: literature incomplete in pdf
You should really switch to biblatex. It is the way to fine tune your bibliography and make certain fields appear or not. If you stick with natbib, it is much more difficult. Try to compile the examples in the biblatex package from the command line to check that you have all what is needed to have biblatex functionning and then go back to LyX. C.
Re: literature incomplete in pdf
On 05/11/2015 05:44 PM, Margret Mueller wrote: I use bibtex (changing to biblatex for some reason gives multiple errors we still work on it) apsr and natbib however the problem is that - in newspaper entries: the publication and the exact date (month day) are not displayed - in working papers the institution is not displayed - and any unicode signs in the literature result in error messages but i can live with manually cleaning the literature of any special letters Im looking forward to any hint as I am not able to find a solution to this in the last months Hi, it is quite possible, that the bibliography style you are using simply doesn't know the fields and entries you have defined, and every field unknown is ignored. For example, non of the bst styles i know have a defined date field, but all just support a year entry. Please consider the following example: %% \documentclass{article} \begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib} @bok{nobook, author={maggie}, title={the title}, } @misc{entry, date={2015-05-11}, author={maggie}, titel={not title, but titel}, } \end{filecontents} \begin{document} \nocite{*} \bibliographystyle{plain} \bibliography{\jobname} \end{document} %% Making biblatex work might be a fruitful endeavour, as hacking bst-styles is a pain. Best regards Johannes
Re: literature incomplete in pdf
You should really switch to biblatex. It is the way to fine tune your bibliography and make certain fields appear or not. If you stick with natbib, it is much more difficult. Try to compile the examples in the biblatex package from the command line to check that you have all what is needed to have biblatex functionning and then go back to LyX. C.
Re: literature incomplete in pdf
On 05/11/2015 05:44 PM, Margret Mueller wrote: I use bibtex (changing to biblatex for some reason gives multiple errors we still work on it) apsr and natbib however the problem is that - in newspaper entries: the publication and the exact date (month day) are not displayed - in working papers the institution is not displayed - and any unicode signs in the literature result in error messages but i can live with manually cleaning the literature of any special letters Im looking forward to any hint as I am not able to find a solution to this in the last months Hi, it is quite possible, that the bibliography style you are using simply doesn't know the fields and entries you have defined, and every field unknown is ignored. For example, non of the bst styles i know have a defined date field, but all just support a year entry. Please consider the following example: %% \documentclass{article} \begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib} @bok{nobook, author={maggie}, title={the title}, } @misc{entry, date={2015-05-11}, author={maggie}, titel={not title, but titel}, } \end{filecontents} \begin{document} \nocite{*} \bibliographystyle{plain} \bibliography{\jobname} \end{document} %% Making biblatex work might be a fruitful endeavour, as hacking bst-styles is a pain. Best regards Johannes
Re: literature incomplete in pdf
You should really switch to biblatex. It is the way to fine tune your bibliography and make certain fields appear or not. If you stick with natbib, it is much more difficult. Try to compile the examples in the biblatex package from the command line to check that you have all what is needed to have biblatex functionning and then go back to LyX. C.
Re: literature incomplete in pdf
On 05/11/2015 05:44 PM, Margret Mueller wrote: I use bibtex (changing to biblatex for some reason gives multiple errors we still work on it) apsr and natbib however the problem is that - in newspaper entries: the publication and the exact date (month day) are not displayed - in working papers the institution is not displayed - and any unicode signs in the literature result in error messages but i can live with manually "cleaning" the literature of any "special" letters Im looking forward to any hint as I am not able to find a solution to this in the last months Hi, it is quite possible, that the bibliography style you are using simply doesn't know the fields and entries you have defined, and every field unknown is ignored. For example, non of the bst styles i know have a defined date field, but all just support a year entry. Please consider the following example: %% \documentclass{article} \begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib} @bok{nobook, author={maggie}, title={the title}, } @misc{entry, date={2015-05-11}, author={maggie}, titel={not title, but titel}, } \end{filecontents} \begin{document} \nocite{*} \bibliographystyle{plain} \bibliography{\jobname} \end{document} %% Making biblatex work might be a fruitful endeavour, as hacking bst-styles is a pain. Best regards Johannes