Re: Real line...
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 10:06:13AM -0500, David Obadia wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17 (14:48), Paul Smith wrote:
Eg, \renewcommand\Re{\mathbf{Re}}
I think the one they are using in the textbooks in not mathbf but mathds
(with \usepackage{dsfont}). So if I put
\usepackage{dsfont}
\newcommand\R{\mathds{R}}
in the preamble and then use \R, it will work. But is there a way to
have LyX display it right (as opposed to a red R) ?
You could use a math macro and create whatever kind of optical
representation you want in the second box. The first box
is exported to LaTeX, the second is for display only.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: Real line...
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 10:06:13AM -0500, David Obadia wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17 (14:48), Paul Smith wrote:
Eg, \renewcommand\Re{\mathbf{Re}}
I think the one they are using in the textbooks in not mathbf but mathds
(with \usepackage{dsfont}). So if I put
\usepackage{dsfont}
\newcommand\R{\mathds{R}}
in the preamble and then use \R, it will work. But is there a way to
have LyX display it right (as opposed to a red R) ?
You could use a math macro and create whatever kind of optical
representation you want in the second box. The first box
is exported to LaTeX, the second is for display only.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: Real line...
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 10:06:13AM -0500, David Obadia wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17 (14:48), Paul Smith wrote:
> > > Eg, \renewcommand\Re{\mathbf{Re}}
>
> I think the one they are using in the textbooks in not mathbf but mathds
> (with \usepackage{dsfont}). So if I put
>
> \usepackage{dsfont}
> \newcommand\R{\mathds{R}}
>
> in the preamble and then use \R, it will work. But is there a way to
> have LyX display it right (as opposed to a "red" R) ?
You could use a math macro and create whatever kind of optical
representation you want in the second box. The first box
is exported to LaTeX, the second is for display only.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Re: Real line...
Try and use a math-macro in lyx. Could somebody here please indicate to me where one can find documentation about macros and math-macros in LyX? Thank you a lot in advance! Paul
Re: Real line...
Paul Smith wrote: Try and use a math-macro in lyx. Could somebody here please indicate to me where one can find documentation about macros Lyx does not currently have any support in text mode for the latex commands \newcommand and \renewcommand. ERT is the latex-correct way to proceed, although it's also possible to use math-macros which will look wysiwym on the screen but will of course wrap your latex up inside math-mode. and math-macros in LyX? math-macros are just wrappers for \newcommand and \renewcommand in math-mode. Their use is documented in the User Guide, section 5.6, User defined macros in math mode. The current (LyX 1.3.x) implementation of mathed is completely different to the non-mathed code. The major goal of the 1.4.x series is to unify these two code bases. When that happens, support for macros in text-mode should follow fairly easily. -- Angus
Re: Real line...
Thank you very much indeed, Angus, for your detailed answer! Paul
Re: Real line...
Try and use a math-macro in lyx. Could somebody here please indicate to me where one can find documentation about macros and math-macros in LyX? Thank you a lot in advance! Paul
Re: Real line...
Paul Smith wrote: Try and use a math-macro in lyx. Could somebody here please indicate to me where one can find documentation about macros Lyx does not currently have any support in text mode for the latex commands \newcommand and \renewcommand. ERT is the latex-correct way to proceed, although it's also possible to use math-macros which will look wysiwym on the screen but will of course wrap your latex up inside math-mode. and math-macros in LyX? math-macros are just wrappers for \newcommand and \renewcommand in math-mode. Their use is documented in the User Guide, section 5.6, User defined macros in math mode. The current (LyX 1.3.x) implementation of mathed is completely different to the non-mathed code. The major goal of the 1.4.x series is to unify these two code bases. When that happens, support for macros in text-mode should follow fairly easily. -- Angus
Re: Real line...
Thank you very much indeed, Angus, for your detailed answer! Paul
Re: Real line...
Try and use a math-macro in lyx. Could somebody here please indicate to me where one can find documentation about macros and math-macros in LyX? Thank you a lot in advance! Paul
Re: Real line...
Paul Smith wrote: >> Try and use a math-macro in lyx. > > Could somebody here please indicate to me where one can find > documentation about macros Lyx does not currently have any support in text mode for the latex commands \newcommand and \renewcommand. ERT is the latex-correct way to proceed, although it's also possible to use math-macros which will look wysiwym on the screen but will of course wrap your latex up inside math-mode. > and math-macros in LyX? math-macros are just wrappers for \newcommand and \renewcommand in math-mode. Their use is documented in the User Guide, section 5.6, "User defined macros in math mode". The current (LyX 1.3.x) implementation of mathed is completely different to the non-mathed code. The major goal of the 1.4.x series is to unify these two code bases. When that happens, support for macros in text-mode should follow fairly easily. -- Angus
Re: Real line...
Thank you very much indeed, Angus, for your detailed answer! Paul
Re: Real line...
What's the proper way to write the standard symbol for the set of Real numbers in LyX? (I mean the R with two bars..) Just write, in maths mode, \mathbb . Alternatively, you can use the Math panel--Symbols--Miscellaneous. Paul
Re: Real line...
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, David Obadia wrote: Hi all, What's the proper way to write the standard symbol for the set of Real numbers in LyX? (I mean the R with two bars..) Thanks, Just from my head, I think it's an 'R' written in the fraktur font. /Christian -- Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
Re: Real line...
Christian Ridderström wrote: On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, David Obadia wrote: Hi all, What's the proper way to write the standard symbol for the set of Real numbers in LyX? (I mean the R with two bars..) Thanks, Just from my head, I think it's an 'R' written in the fraktur font. The LaTeX definition is \Re. You can enter that in math mode directly, and LyX will recognize it. If you always use it this way, you can redefine \Re in the preamble if you want a different look. Georg
Re: Real line...
If you always use it this way, you can redefine \Re in the preamble if you want a different look. How, Georg? How can one redefine \Re ? Paul
Re: Real line...
Paul Smith wrote:
How, Georg? How can one redefine \Re ?
Eg, \renewcommand\Re{\mathbf{Re}}
--
Angus
Re: Real line...
How, Georg? How can one redefine \Re ?
Eg, \renewcommand\Re{\mathbf{Re}}
Thanks, Angus!
Paul
Re: Real line...
On Sat, Jan 17 (14:48), Paul Smith wrote:
Eg, \renewcommand\Re{\mathbf{Re}}
I think the one they are using in the textbooks in not mathbf but mathds
(with \usepackage{dsfont}). So if I put
\usepackage{dsfont}
\newcommand\R{\mathds{R}}
in the preamble and then use \R, it will work. But is there a way to
have LyX display it right (as opposed to a red R) ?
Thanks,
--
David Obadia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Real line...
David Obadia wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17 (14:48), Paul Smith wrote:
Eg, \renewcommand\Re{\mathbf{Re}}
I think \Re means the real part of a number (just as \Im is the
imaginary part). \mathbf{Re} will give the symbol of Real numbers
\usepackage{dsfont}
\newcommand\R{\mathds{R}}
in the preamble and then use \R, it will work. But is there a way to
have LyX display it right (as opposed to a red R) ?
Try and use a math-macro in lyx.
If you define it to be \mathbf{Re}, then \R will be replaced
automatically (in math-mode) with the propper symbol. Also, you can use
the extra right field of the math-macro, to tell lyx how to display the
command in math-mode.
Amir.
Re: Real line...
Amir Seginer wrote:
imaginary part). \mathbf{Re} will give the symbol of Real numbers
Should be \mathbb{Re}.
Amir
Re: Real line...
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:26:55 -0500
David Obadia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
What's the proper way to write the standard symbol for the set of
Real numbers in LyX? (I mean the R with two bars..)
Hi David,
I personally like the symbols from the bbm-package most. Insert
\usepackage{bbm}
\newcommand{\IN}{\mathbbm{N}}
\newcommand{\IR}{\mathbbm{R}}
into the preamble, then you can simply type \IRspace in math and get
the desired symbol.
Greetings,
Karsten
Re: Real line...
David Obadia wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17 (17:50), Amir Seginer wrote:
Amir Seginer wrote:
imaginary part). \mathbf{Re} will give the symbol of Real numbers
Should be \mathbb{Re}.
In \mathbb, the R gives me the same R as just \mathbb{R} (which looks
like, but is not quite like the real R) and the e seems to introduce a
bunch of spacing.
Sorry, I meant \mathbb{R}
Amir.
Re: Real line...
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, David Obadia wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17 (14:48), Paul Smith wrote:
Eg, \renewcommand\Re{\mathbf{Re}}
I think the one they are using in the textbooks in not mathbf but mathds
(with \usepackage{dsfont}). So if I put
\usepackage{dsfont}
\newcommand\R{\mathds{R}}
in the preamble and then use \R, it will work. But is there a way to
have LyX display it right (as opposed to a red R) ?
For those using bi-directional elatex, don't redeifne \R as it is used for
right-to-left text.
Alon
--
This message was sent by Alon Altman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ICQ:1366540
GPG public key at http://alon.wox.org/pubkey.txt
Key fingerprint = A670 6C81 19D3 3773 3627 DE14 B44A 50A3 FE06 7F24
--
-=[ Random Fortune ]=-
I have already given two cousins to the war and I stand ready to sacrifice
my wife's brother.
-- Artemus Ward
Re: Real line...
On Sat, Jan 17 (18:24), Karsten Heymann wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:26:55 -0500 David Obadia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What's the proper way to write the standard symbol for the set of
Real numbers in LyX? (I mean the R with two bars..)
Hi David,
I personally like the symbols from the bbm-package most. Insert
\usepackage{bbm}
\newcommand{\IN}{\mathbbm{N}}
\newcommand{\IR}{\mathbbm{R}}
into the preamble, then you can simply type \IRspace in math and get
the desired symbol.
Thanks alot. And \IR is a very well choosen name for this symbol ;-)
--
David Obadia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Real line...
What's the proper way to write the standard symbol for the set of Real numbers in LyX? (I mean the R with two bars..) Just write, in maths mode, \mathbb . Alternatively, you can use the Math panel--Symbols--Miscellaneous. Paul
Re: Real line...
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, David Obadia wrote: Hi all, What's the proper way to write the standard symbol for the set of Real numbers in LyX? (I mean the R with two bars..) Thanks, Just from my head, I think it's an 'R' written in the fraktur font. /Christian -- Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
Re: Real line...
Christian Ridderström wrote: On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, David Obadia wrote: Hi all, What's the proper way to write the standard symbol for the set of Real numbers in LyX? (I mean the R with two bars..) Thanks, Just from my head, I think it's an 'R' written in the fraktur font. The LaTeX definition is \Re. You can enter that in math mode directly, and LyX will recognize it. If you always use it this way, you can redefine \Re in the preamble if you want a different look. Georg
Re: Real line...
If you always use it this way, you can redefine \Re in the preamble if you want a different look. How, Georg? How can one redefine \Re ? Paul
Re: Real line...
Paul Smith wrote:
How, Georg? How can one redefine \Re ?
Eg, \renewcommand\Re{\mathbf{Re}}
--
Angus
Re: Real line...
How, Georg? How can one redefine \Re ?
Eg, \renewcommand\Re{\mathbf{Re}}
Thanks, Angus!
Paul
Re: Real line...
On Sat, Jan 17 (14:48), Paul Smith wrote:
Eg, \renewcommand\Re{\mathbf{Re}}
I think the one they are using in the textbooks in not mathbf but mathds
(with \usepackage{dsfont}). So if I put
\usepackage{dsfont}
\newcommand\R{\mathds{R}}
in the preamble and then use \R, it will work. But is there a way to
have LyX display it right (as opposed to a red R) ?
Thanks,
--
David Obadia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Real line...
David Obadia wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17 (14:48), Paul Smith wrote:
Eg, \renewcommand\Re{\mathbf{Re}}
I think \Re means the real part of a number (just as \Im is the
imaginary part). \mathbf{Re} will give the symbol of Real numbers
\usepackage{dsfont}
\newcommand\R{\mathds{R}}
in the preamble and then use \R, it will work. But is there a way to
have LyX display it right (as opposed to a red R) ?
Try and use a math-macro in lyx.
If you define it to be \mathbf{Re}, then \R will be replaced
automatically (in math-mode) with the propper symbol. Also, you can use
the extra right field of the math-macro, to tell lyx how to display the
command in math-mode.
Amir.
Re: Real line...
Amir Seginer wrote:
imaginary part). \mathbf{Re} will give the symbol of Real numbers
Should be \mathbb{Re}.
Amir
Re: Real line...
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:26:55 -0500
David Obadia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
What's the proper way to write the standard symbol for the set of
Real numbers in LyX? (I mean the R with two bars..)
Hi David,
I personally like the symbols from the bbm-package most. Insert
\usepackage{bbm}
\newcommand{\IN}{\mathbbm{N}}
\newcommand{\IR}{\mathbbm{R}}
into the preamble, then you can simply type \IRspace in math and get
the desired symbol.
Greetings,
Karsten
Re: Real line...
David Obadia wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17 (17:50), Amir Seginer wrote:
Amir Seginer wrote:
imaginary part). \mathbf{Re} will give the symbol of Real numbers
Should be \mathbb{Re}.
In \mathbb, the R gives me the same R as just \mathbb{R} (which looks
like, but is not quite like the real R) and the e seems to introduce a
bunch of spacing.
Sorry, I meant \mathbb{R}
Amir.
Re: Real line...
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, David Obadia wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17 (14:48), Paul Smith wrote:
Eg, \renewcommand\Re{\mathbf{Re}}
I think the one they are using in the textbooks in not mathbf but mathds
(with \usepackage{dsfont}). So if I put
\usepackage{dsfont}
\newcommand\R{\mathds{R}}
in the preamble and then use \R, it will work. But is there a way to
have LyX display it right (as opposed to a red R) ?
For those using bi-directional elatex, don't redeifne \R as it is used for
right-to-left text.
Alon
--
This message was sent by Alon Altman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ICQ:1366540
GPG public key at http://alon.wox.org/pubkey.txt
Key fingerprint = A670 6C81 19D3 3773 3627 DE14 B44A 50A3 FE06 7F24
--
-=[ Random Fortune ]=-
I have already given two cousins to the war and I stand ready to sacrifice
my wife's brother.
-- Artemus Ward
Re: Real line...
On Sat, Jan 17 (18:24), Karsten Heymann wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:26:55 -0500 David Obadia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What's the proper way to write the standard symbol for the set of
Real numbers in LyX? (I mean the R with two bars..)
Hi David,
I personally like the symbols from the bbm-package most. Insert
\usepackage{bbm}
\newcommand{\IN}{\mathbbm{N}}
\newcommand{\IR}{\mathbbm{R}}
into the preamble, then you can simply type \IRspace in math and get
the desired symbol.
Thanks alot. And \IR is a very well choosen name for this symbol ;-)
--
David Obadia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Real line...
What's the proper way to write the "standard" symbol for the set of Real numbers in LyX? (I mean the R with two bars..) Just write, in maths mode, \mathbb . Alternatively, you can use the Math panel-->Symbols-->Miscellaneous. Paul
Re: Real line...
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, David Obadia wrote: > > Hi all, > What's the proper way to write the "standard" symbol for the set of Real > numbers in LyX? (I mean the R with two bars..) > Thanks, Just from my head, I think it's an 'R' written in the "fraktur" font. /Christian -- Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
Re: Real line...
Christian Ridderström wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, David Obadia wrote: > >> >> Hi all, >> What's the proper way to write the "standard" symbol for the set of Real >> numbers in LyX? (I mean the R with two bars..) >> Thanks, > > Just from my head, I think it's an 'R' written in the "fraktur" font. The LaTeX definition is \Re. You can enter that in math mode directly, and LyX will recognize it. If you always use it this way, you can redefine \Re in the preamble if you want a different look. Georg
Re: Real line...
If you always use it this way, you can redefine \Re in the preamble if you want a different look. How, Georg? How can one redefine \Re ? Paul
Re: Real line...
Paul Smith wrote:
> How, Georg? How can one redefine \Re ?
Eg, \renewcommand\Re{\mathbf{Re}}
--
Angus
Re: Real line...
How, Georg? How can one redefine \Re ?
Eg, \renewcommand\Re{\mathbf{Re}}
Thanks, Angus!
Paul
Re: Real line...
On Sat, Jan 17 (14:48), Paul Smith wrote:
> > Eg, \renewcommand\Re{\mathbf{Re}}
I think the one they are using in the textbooks in not mathbf but mathds
(with \usepackage{dsfont}). So if I put
\usepackage{dsfont}
\newcommand\R{\mathds{R}}
in the preamble and then use \R, it will work. But is there a way to
have LyX display it right (as opposed to a "red" R) ?
Thanks,
--
David Obadia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Real line...
David Obadia wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17 (14:48), Paul Smith wrote:
Eg, \renewcommand\Re{\mathbf{Re}}
I think \Re means the real part of a number (just as \Im is the
imaginary part). \mathbf{Re} will give the symbol of Real numbers
\usepackage{dsfont}
\newcommand\R{\mathds{R}}
in the preamble and then use \R, it will work. But is there a way to
have LyX display it right (as opposed to a "red" R) ?
Try and use a math-macro in lyx.
If you define it to be \mathbf{Re}, then \R will be replaced
automatically (in math-mode) with the propper symbol. Also, you can use
the extra right field of the math-macro, to tell lyx how to display the
command in math-mode.
Amir.
Re: Real line...
Amir Seginer wrote:
imaginary part). \mathbf{Re} will give the symbol of Real numbers
Should be \mathbb{Re}.
Amir
Re: Real line...
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:26:55 -0500
"David Obadia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> What's the proper way to write the "standard" symbol for the set of
> Real numbers in LyX? (I mean the R with two bars..)
Hi David,
I personally like the symbols from the bbm-package most. Insert
\usepackage{bbm}
\newcommand{\IN}{\mathbbm{N}}
\newcommand{\IR}{\mathbbm{R}}
into the preamble, then you can simply type \IR in math and get
the desired symbol.
Greetings,
Karsten
Re: Real line...
David Obadia wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17 (17:50), Amir Seginer wrote:
Amir Seginer wrote:
imaginary part). \mathbf{Re} will give the symbol of Real numbers
Should be \mathbb{Re}.
In \mathbb, the R gives me the same R as just \mathbb{R} (which looks
like, but is not quite like the "real" R) and the e seems to introduce a
bunch of spacing.
Sorry, I meant \mathbb{R}
Amir.
Re: Real line...
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, David Obadia wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17 (14:48), Paul Smith wrote:
> > > Eg, \renewcommand\Re{\mathbf{Re}}
>
> I think the one they are using in the textbooks in not mathbf but mathds
> (with \usepackage{dsfont}). So if I put
>
> \usepackage{dsfont}
> \newcommand\R{\mathds{R}}
>
> in the preamble and then use \R, it will work. But is there a way to
> have LyX display it right (as opposed to a "red" R) ?
For those using bi-directional elatex, don't redeifne \R as it is used for
right-to-left text.
Alon
--
This message was sent by Alon Altman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ICQ:1366540
GPG public key at http://alon.wox.org/pubkey.txt
Key fingerprint = A670 6C81 19D3 3773 3627 DE14 B44A 50A3 FE06 7F24
--
-=[ Random Fortune ]=-
I have already given two cousins to the war and I stand ready to sacrifice
my wife's brother.
-- Artemus Ward
Re: Real line...
On Sat, Jan 17 (18:24), Karsten Heymann wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:26:55 -0500 "David Obadia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > What's the proper way to write the "standard" symbol for the set of
> > Real numbers in LyX? (I mean the R with two bars..)
>
> Hi David,
>
> I personally like the symbols from the bbm-package most. Insert
>
> \usepackage{bbm}
> \newcommand{\IN}{\mathbbm{N}}
> \newcommand{\IR}{\mathbbm{R}}
>
> into the preamble, then you can simply type \IR in math and get
> the desired symbol.
Thanks alot. And \IR is a very well choosen name for this symbol ;-)
--
David Obadia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Real line...
Hi all, What's the proper way to write the standard symbol for the set of Real numbers in LyX? (I mean the R with two bars..) Thanks, -- David Obadia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Real line...
Hi all, What's the proper way to write the standard symbol for the set of Real numbers in LyX? (I mean the R with two bars..) Thanks, -- David Obadia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Real line...
Hi all, What's the proper way to write the "standard" symbol for the set of Real numbers in LyX? (I mean the R with two bars..) Thanks, -- David Obadia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
