Re: [maemo-developers] Sardine is back
ext Jose Dapena Paz wrote: El sáb, 25-11-2006 a las 14:04 +0200, Carlos Guerreiro escribió: deb http://repository.maemo.org sardine main non-free That's all. Sardine is self-contained. It includes the Maemo 2.1 baseline. Uhm. Then I should set this outside the application installer catalogue manager, as standard application installer doesn't let me remove the first entry. Should I wipe this out? The Application Manager will indeed prevent you from removing the 1st entry, However, it doesn't hurt as it doesn't intersect with Sardine, it contains only stand-alone applications (not libraries) and themes. I have found it OK to leave it in. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Sardine is back
"ext Jose Dapena Paz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > El sáb, 25-11-2006 a las 14:04 +0200, Carlos Guerreiro escribió: > >> deb http://repository.maemo.org sardine main non-free >> >> That's all. Sardine is self-contained. It includes the Maemo 2.1 baseline. > > Uhm. Then I should set this outside the application installer catalogue > manager, as standard application installer doesn't let me remove the > first entry. Should I wipe this out? It should be OK to keep the pre-configured "Nokia Catalogue" entries in sources.list for now. But in general, yes, the Nokia Catalogues are made for the maemo "mistral" and "shirocco" distributions and not for "sardine". ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Sardine is back
El sáb, 25-11-2006 a las 14:04 +0200, Carlos Guerreiro escribió: > deb http://repository.maemo.org sardine main non-free > > That's all. Sardine is self-contained. It includes the Maemo 2.1 baseline. Uhm. Then I should set this outside the application installer catalogue manager, as standard application installer doesn't let me remove the first entry. Should I wipe this out? -- Jose Dapena Paz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Igalia ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Sardine is back
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 19:00 +0200, Carlos Guerreiro wrote: The xtrans-dev issue is probably due to packaging problem which I hope will be fixed soon. Basically xtrans-dev replaces libxtrans-dev but unfortunately it is not conflicting with it. If you install the hildon-application-framework metapackage it will take care of removing the old one so that problem doesn't hit you. In your case try removing libxtrans-dev manually. It's a dependency of libx11-dev, wich is a dependency of libgtk2.0-dev, which I'd like to keep. Otherwise try to find out more by trying xtrans-dev by hand. Maybe this is useful: [sbox-SDK_maemo2sardine_686: > fakeroot apt-get install xtrans-dev Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: xtrans-dev 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 25 not upgraded. 90 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/58.0kB of archives. After unpacking 369kB of additional disk space will be used. /bin/sh: line 1: /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure: No such file or directory (Reading database ... 29495 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking xtrans-dev (from .../xtrans-dev_1.0.0-4_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/xtrans-dev_1.0.0-4_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/pkgconfig/xtrans.pc', which is also in package libxtrans-dev Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/xtrans-dev_1.0.0-4_all.deb E: Sub-process /scratchbox/devkits/debian/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) [sbox-SDK_maemo2sardine_686: > fakeroot apt-get upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libx11-dev: Depends: xtrans-dev but it is not installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f. Hmmm. I really recommend resetting your rootstrap to get out of that hole. However you might still want to try force installing xtrans-dev with dpkg Probably something like dpkg --force-all /var/cache/apt/archives/xtrans-dev_1.0.0-4_all.deb then apt-get -f install Btw, I'm almost finished with the Sardine setup instructions. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Sardine is back
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 19:00 +0200, Carlos Guerreiro wrote: > The xtrans-dev issue is probably due to packaging problem which I > hope > will be fixed soon. > Basically xtrans-dev replaces libxtrans-dev but unfortunately it is > not > conflicting with it. > If you install the hildon-application-framework metapackage it will > take > care of removing the old one > so that problem doesn't hit you. > > In your case try removing libxtrans-dev manually. It's a dependency of libx11-dev, wich is a dependency of libgtk2.0-dev, which I'd like to keep. > Otherwise try to find out more by trying xtrans-dev by hand. Maybe this is useful: [sbox-SDK_maemo2sardine_686: > fakeroot apt-get install xtrans-dev Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: xtrans-dev 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 25 not upgraded. 90 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/58.0kB of archives. After unpacking 369kB of additional disk space will be used. /bin/sh: line 1: /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure: No such file or directory (Reading database ... 29495 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking xtrans-dev (from .../xtrans-dev_1.0.0-4_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/xtrans-dev_1.0.0-4_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/pkgconfig/xtrans.pc', which is also in package libxtrans-dev Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/xtrans-dev_1.0.0-4_all.deb E: Sub-process /scratchbox/devkits/debian/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) [sbox-SDK_maemo2sardine_686: > fakeroot apt-get upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libx11-dev: Depends: xtrans-dev but it is not installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Sardine is back
ext Murray Cumming wrote: On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 14:04 +0200, Carlos Guerreiro wrote: ext Murray Cumming wrote: On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 22:58 +0200, Carlos Guerreiro wrote: Sardine is back. The Sardine distro was restarted with the newer Maemo 2.1 baseline and an older glib. [snip] What exactly should we now have in our sources.list to use sardine? deb http://repository.maemo.org sardine main non-free That's all. Sardine is self-contained. It includes the Maemo 2.1 baseline. Thanks. And a similar deb-src line can be added too. I'm currently getting this error with dist-upgrade: The following packages have unmet dependences: libx11-dev: Depends: xtrans-dev but it is not installed I know you said we might need to trash our targets and create them again (upgrading from Maemo 2.1?), but I'd like to avoid that if I can. I'm working on documenting the installation procedure. Need to finish that soon. But basically: In scratchbox: - apt-get install hildon-application-framework - apt-get upgrade In the device: - apt-get install hildon-application-framework - apt-get upgrade - some packages are held back. You need to install them manually with 'apt-get install' The xtrans-dev issue is probably due to packaging problem which I hope will be fixed soon. Basically xtrans-dev replaces libxtrans-dev but unfortunately it is not conflicting with it. If you install the hildon-application-framework metapackage it will take care of removing the old one so that problem doesn't hit you. In your case try removing libxtrans-dev manually. Otherwise try to find out more by trying xtrans-dev by hand. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Sardine is back
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 14:04 +0200, Carlos Guerreiro wrote: > ext Murray Cumming wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 22:58 +0200, Carlos Guerreiro wrote: > > > >> Sardine is back. The Sardine distro was restarted with the newer > >> Maemo > >> 2.1 baseline and an older glib. > >> > > [snip] > > > > What exactly should we now have in our sources.list to use sardine? > > > > > deb http://repository.maemo.org sardine main non-free > > That's all. Sardine is self-contained. It includes the Maemo 2.1 baseline. Thanks. And a similar deb-src line can be added too. I'm currently getting this error with dist-upgrade: The following packages have unmet dependences: libx11-dev: Depends: xtrans-dev but it is not installed I know you said we might need to trash our targets and create them again (upgrading from Maemo 2.1?), but I'd like to avoid that if I can. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Sardine is back
ext Murray Cumming wrote: On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 22:58 +0200, Carlos Guerreiro wrote: Sardine is back. The Sardine distro was restarted with the newer Maemo 2.1 baseline and an older glib. [snip] What exactly should we now have in our sources.list to use sardine? deb http://repository.maemo.org sardine main non-free That's all. Sardine is self-contained. It includes the Maemo 2.1 baseline. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Sardine is back
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 22:58 +0200, Carlos Guerreiro wrote: > Sardine is back. The Sardine distro was restarted with the newer > Maemo > 2.1 baseline and an older glib. [snip] What exactly should we now have in our sources.list to use sardine? -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
RE: [maemo-developers] Sardine is back
> -Original Message- > From: ext Murray Cumming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 23 November, 2006 10:39 > To: Guerreiro Carlos (Nokia-M/Helsinki) > Cc: maemo-dev > Subject: Re: [maemo-developers] Sardine is back > > > On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 22:58 +0200, Carlos Guerreiro wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Sardine is back. The Sardine distro was restarted with the > newer Maemo > > 2.1 baseline and an older glib. > > If you were following the disto before the restarting it > might be that > > an upgrade will work for you but > > given that the same component versions were rebuilt differently, a > > clean upgrade path might not exist. > > So resetting rootstrasps / reflashing might be necessary to > get Sardine > > to work. > > I just tried it on OS2006 with the latest SW update and it > worked fine > > for me. I still have to document > > the detailed steps, but basically I followed Frantisek's > approach here: > > http://maemo.org/maemowiki/HowTo_GetStartedWithSardine > > There's also this page (google found it): > http://sardine.garage.maemo.org/getting_started.html > > It would be less confusing if they were combined, with one > redirecting to the other. Yes. Well, the latter points to a current issues pages which points to the former (look for Maemo Wiki link), but yes there's too much redundancy and these pages are not aligned. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Sardine is back
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 22:58 +0200, Carlos Guerreiro wrote: > Hi, > > Sardine is back. The Sardine distro was restarted with the newer Maemo > 2.1 baseline and an older glib. > If you were following the disto before the restarting it might be that > an upgrade will work for you but > given that the same component versions were rebuilt differently, a > clean upgrade path might not exist. > So resetting rootstrasps / reflashing might be necessary to get Sardine > to work. > I just tried it on OS2006 with the latest SW update and it worked fine > for me. I still have to document > the detailed steps, but basically I followed Frantisek's approach here: > http://maemo.org/maemowiki/HowTo_GetStartedWithSardine There's also this page (google found it): http://sardine.garage.maemo.org/getting_started.html It would be less confusing if they were combined, with one redirecting to the other. > Now that the packages and the build environment are in a good shape it's > time to get strict about the "one build for one version" > policy. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
[maemo-developers] Sardine is back
Hi, Sardine is back. The Sardine distro was restarted with the newer Maemo 2.1 baseline and an older glib. If you were following the disto before the restarting it might be that an upgrade will work for you but given that the same component versions were rebuilt differently, a clean upgrade path might not exist. So resetting rootstrasps / reflashing might be necessary to get Sardine to work. I just tried it on OS2006 with the latest SW update and it worked fine for me. I still have to document the detailed steps, but basically I followed Frantisek's approach here: http://maemo.org/maemowiki/HowTo_GetStartedWithSardine Now that the packages and the build environment are in a good shape it's time to get strict about the "one build for one version" policy. Enjoy, Carlos ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
