Re: [Mageia-dev] Talk of Browsers

2010-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
2010/10/1 Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com:
 On 1 October 2010 04:07, Tux99 tux99-...@uridium.org wrote:
 While we are at it, why don't we rather include AdblockPlus enabled by
 default with EasyList+EasyPrivacy filters for Firefox?
 Blocking off ads and tracking scripts makes Firefox a lot faster too!

 I've packaged this extension (in contribs) a long time ago so that not
 every user of a sytem has to install it in its own account.
 Of course you still have to subscribe to easylist.

Which extionsion a user wants to instaall should be left to the user's
decision. Make the install easy but do not install any extensions by
default. I've never used those extensions, except the developper bar.
Somebody told me to install Adblock and whatever, I did and FF became
unstable but not one second faster.
Maybe because I do not visit many sites with large ads and all that
bling-bling stuff.

Anyhow, as a rule do not add any stuff by default that the user ought
to decide for himself, this is not Windows. We should not tell the
user what he wants to do.

wobo


Re: [Mageia-dev] What do you think about create a Mageia Welcome Center?

2010-10-01 Thread Dick Gevers
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:49:34 + (UTC), André Machado wrote about Re:
[Mageia-dev] What do you think about create a Mageia Welcome Center?:

Think in emotive computer. Think that user starts up your computer and
sees a window with text: Good morning/afternon/night username!. And in
another line, You have 3 new e-mails. And on side, tue current weather
and, below, a list of user compromises for that day, all together the
hardware information and shortcuts for common tasks and diagnostic tests
of hardware and software, and a warning that package updates are
available! - yes, I had all these new ideas now!

Well, YMMV, but that is precisely the kind of computer I want to have only
as far away from me as possible: I want to be in control, I have enough
emotions at work, at home, in transport and in recreation - I want my boxen
to be tools without *any* emotion or interest in me, just let them do for
me what I choose to imagine as far as they can. No more no less. Also, it
does not have to approach the looks of a mobile phone.

Anyway, I'll see what Mageia gives when it is there. So far she remains my
best choice still. (Compare my headers ;)

Ciao,
=Dick Gevers=



Re: [Mageia-dev] Talk of Browsers

2010-10-01 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 1 October 2010 10:44, Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Which extionsion a user wants to instaall should be left to the user's
 decision. Make the install easy but do not install any extensions by
 default. I've never used those extensions, except the developper bar.
 Somebody told me to install Adblock and whatever, I did and FF became
 unstable but not one second faster.
 Maybe because I do not visit many sites with large ads and all that
 bling-bling stuff.

 Anyhow, as a rule do not add any stuff by default that the user ought
 to decide for himself, this is not Windows. We should not tell the
 user what he wants to do.

Then we shouldn't install neither firefox nor konqueror at all since
that's a choice that the user ought to decide for himself...
Installing the extension doesn't mean neither auto subscrubing nor
being unable to disable it


Re: [Mageia-dev] Talk of Browsers

2010-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
2010/10/1 Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com:
 On 1 October 2010 10:44, Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Which extionsion a user wants to instaall should be left to the user's
 decision. Make the install easy but do not install any extensions by
 default. I've never used those extensions, except the developper bar.
 Somebody told me to install Adblock and whatever, I did and FF became
 unstable but not one second faster.
 Maybe because I do not visit many sites with large ads and all that
 bling-bling stuff.

 Anyhow, as a rule do not add any stuff by default that the user ought
 to decide for himself, this is not Windows. We should not tell the
 user what he wants to do.

 Then we shouldn't install neither firefox nor konqueror at all since
 that's a choice that the user ought to decide for himself...

C'mon, a browser is not the same as a browser extension. Of course
there must be defaults. But installing browser extensions by default
is too much default IMHO. Same as with mail clients. You should set
a mail client by default but you should not add any extensions to this
client by default.

wobo


Re: [Mageia-dev] Talk of Browsers

2010-10-01 Thread atilla ontas
2010/10/1 Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com:
 2010/10/1 Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com:
 On 1 October 2010 10:44, Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Which extionsion a user wants to instaall should be left to the user's
 decision. Make the install easy but do not install any extensions by
 default. I've never used those extensions, except the developper bar.
 Somebody told me to install Adblock and whatever, I did and FF became
 unstable but not one second faster.
 Maybe because I do not visit many sites with large ads and all that
 bling-bling stuff.

 Anyhow, as a rule do not add any stuff by default that the user ought
 to decide for himself, this is not Windows. We should not tell the
 user what he wants to do.

 Then we shouldn't install neither firefox nor konqueror at all since
 that's a choice that the user ought to decide for himself...

 C'mon, a browser is not the same as a browser extension. Of course
 there must be defaults. But installing browser extensions by default
 is too much default IMHO. Same as with mail clients. You should set
 a mail client by default but you should not add any extensions to this
 client by default.

 wobo

Please do not make any extension as default. Even do not paxckage
extensions. A user should decide which extension he/she uses. Also, i
don't understand why extensions packaged. Day by day extensions
updated on upstream. So, packages left behind current versions.

Btw, i noticed that Firefox installed in
/usr/share/firefox-release-number. I don't know how buildsystem works
but when ff updated all extensions must be updated for new install
dir. Doesn't this behaviour brings extra workload?


Re: [Mageia-dev] About Mandriva tools future : Host Mandriva tools on github

2010-10-01 Thread Marc Paré

Le 2010-10-01 06:38, Fabrice Facorat a écrit :

I've been following closely all the Mandriva vs Mageia story. I found
it unfortunate that we have to come to this way, but I guess there's a
serious fracture between Mandriva and part of its community. We have
no choice except to cope with this and try to do our best to allow
this unfortunate situation to found a sensible solution in the future.

As we know, one of the Mandriva strenght are the Mandriva tools,
however Mandriva tools have some issues :
- they are written in perl. Sorry for perl dev, but I do still think
that perl is harder to understand than C-like based syntax langages.
However we must admit that we are not going to rewrite all the
Mandriva tools ;-) However better documentation ( PerlDoc tags ) could
help a little.

- Mandriva tools are not used by others distributions ( except
PCLinuxOS, United Linux, and ... Mageia ) and so have few external
contributions : They notably lack visibility.

I do think also that Mandriva will have to use its ressources in an
efficient way.

Here aree my proposals, feel free to discuss :

1. host Mandriva tools on github or code.google.com. This will ease
fork maintenance and tracking, to contribute back ( without having to
have a Mandriva account )

2. Make some decisions about the tools we should keep, and the ones we
should ... trash. For example we did replace printerdrake with
system-config-printer ( python ), and msec have been rewritten (
python ). Whereas I do think that system-config-printer is way buggier
than printerdrake, I guess that at some points, we will have to do
this more and more : replace some Mandriva tools with for example some
Fedora ones. Please note however that this bring its own issues :
python vs perl, and the integration with the rest of Mandriva
infrastructure

3. A decision will have to be made concerning net_applet and NetworkManager

4. Whereas I do love rpmdrake, I do think also that something will
have to be done about it as its UI is clearly outdated and not on par
with the competition :
- Ubuntu software center :
http://seilo.geekyogre.com/2010/09/software-center-with-a-dose-of-zeitgeist-and-maybe-teamgeist/
, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_Software_Center ,
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwareCenter
- iTunes App Store :
http://www.askdavetaylor.com/how_to_download_iphone_apps_from_apple_itunes_store.html
, 
http://cybernetnews.com/download-iphone-firmware-20-itunes-77-app-store-and-more/
- Interesting discussion about PackageKit direction :
http://mairin.wordpress.com/2010/09/01/a-story-about-updates-and-people/

So we may have to completely rewrite rpmdrake UI or switch to
packagekit with and urpmi backend.

5. Junior tasks contributions. I noticed while visiting the
LibreOffice website. They have junior task for people willing to
contribute to the codebase, and most of theses junior tasks consist to
improve code clarity, fix comments. I guess that the same thing could
be done with Mandriva tools, notably adding perldoc tags/comments.

Last but not least, I know that on Mageia ML, there was a discussion
about the people we should target. Here are some interesting
reflexions :
Sweet Caroline : http://mairin.wordpress.com/2010/09/02/sweet-caroline/
fedoraproject.org redesign update :
http://mairin.wordpress.com/2010/09/03/fedoraproject-org-redesign-update/
You must be this tall to ride: __ :
http://mairin.wordpress.com/2010/10/01/you-must-be-this-tall-to-ride-__/




Thanks for your observations Fabrice.

Just speaking from the user point of view. Let us not lose sight that 
one of the strong points of Mandriva/Mageia is the use of the MCC. 
Having all the controls under one title and well integrated is what 
really distinguishes Mandriva from the other distros. Practically in all 
of the news items that I have read of Mandriva, they mention the 
powerful tools at the users' disposal to help in configure/maintain the 
Mandriva distro, and this type of comment has been going on for years.


I hope that Mageia would not stray from this tool. Whichever way the 
devs decide to programme the tools from the back-en does not matter to 
the user. How easily it is to configure/maintain the distro is what 
counts to the user and it is quite a strong selling point.


When I help out people with their Mandriva setup and I tell them to go 
to their MCC (if they are not familiar with it, I usually say You know, 
the blue sceen and red wrench thingy at the bottom of your monitor., 
they are confortable in using it.


The only thing that I find lacking for the MCC is the lack of immediate 
help. If a user has never used a section of MCC, they will normally 
abandon the use of that section. But if there were a help button that 
would explain, in a graphic way (either video or by slide show) the use 
of that section, then that would go a long way in helping out.


I sincerely hope that the MCC (Mageia Contol Centre) will not be abandoned.

Marc



Re: [Mageia-dev] About Mandriva tools future : Host Mandriva tools on github

2010-10-01 Thread Fabrice Facorat
2010/10/1 Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com:


 Somehow I have a feeling this thread will be a deja vu of the rpm vs.
 deb thread...



 Yes, the magic of mailists strikes again. And of course, the same arguments
 will be restated again because people can not browse back to the previous
 arguments. In a lot of cases, Déjà vu could almost be called the alias of
 Mailist. LOL

this is not rpm vs deb or synaptic vs smart vs rpmdrake.

This is about making some decisions about some tools. Some of the
Mandriva tools have outdate UI, cluttered UI and even are sometimes
buggy.
The situation persists since many years already, so at some point we
should ask ourself : are we going to rewrite them, notably the UI, to
make them be more 2010, or should we use another tool with another
GUI.



-- 
Close the World, Open the Net
http://www.linux-wizard.net


Re: [Mageia-dev] About Mandriva tools future : Host Mandriva tools on github

2010-10-01 Thread Michael Scherer
Le vendredi 01 octobre 2010 à 12:52 +0200, Olivier Blin a écrit :
 Fabrice Facorat fabrice.faco...@gmail.com writes:
 
  1. host Mandriva tools on github or code.google.com. This will ease
  fork maintenance and tracking, to contribute back ( without having to
  have a Mandriva account )
 
 Why host them externally?
 A self-hosted forge is probably better.

Yup, and I can only add a link
http://mako.cc/writing/hill-free_tools.html 

 But actually, just moving to git could make contributions easier,
 because of the ability for developpers to commit locally, and push
 incremental patchsets.

I would be in favor of 1 git repository for 1 software, even if I didn't
see people complaining that svn prevented them to provides patches :)

On the infrastructure side, it was also proposed to look at gitorious
for this. Is it packaged in mandriva ? ( if not, maybe that would be a
good way to help ).

-- 
Michael Scherer



Re: [Mageia-dev] About Mandriva tools future : Host Mandriva tools on github

2010-10-01 Thread Marc Paré

Le 2010-10-01 07:23, Tux99 a écrit :

On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Fabrice Facorat wrote:


This is about making some decisions about some tools. Some of the
Mandriva tools have outdate UI, cluttered UI and even are sometimes
buggy.
The situation persists since many years already, so at some point we
should ask ourself : are we going to rewrite them, notably the UI, to
make them be more 2010, or should we use another tool with another
GUI.


Personally I don't see anything wrong with the GUI of the draktools.

If imrpoving them means to rewrite them from scratch or replace them
with inferior tools from other distros, then that would be a big effort
and/or step backwards just for the estetics.

Substance counts a lot more than appearance to me.

P.S: cc'ing in both cooker and mageia lists is not a good idea as many
people are not on both lists so the discussion will just split in two




Ooops, Tux99, it also looks like your post has broken the thread on the 
dev side.


The thread probably best belongs on the dev mailist.

Marc



Re: [Mageia-dev] Hello

2010-10-01 Thread Gustavo Giampaoli
Hi zieduz

Did you put your name in the wiki? www.mageia.org/wiki

Cheers!



Gustavo Giampaoli (aka tavillo1980)


Re: [Mageia-dev] Identifying Target Markets

2010-10-01 Thread Frank Griffin
I'm not sure what's going on with this ML.  I responded to a post by
Graham Lauder, and it ended up going to him but not the ML.  He then
responded to me privately, and we both agreed to repost to the ML. 
According to the gmane archives, he did, but I never received his
repost, so I can't place my reply in the correct branch of the thread. 
I'll post it here, just so that it's *somewhere* in the thread...

Graham Lauder wrote:
 42 for me, I started with NCR in August of 1968 and went on to be MD of my 
 own 
 company for eighteen years, these days retired on my little country estate, 
 wonderful lifestyle, bloody awful internet connection.  :)
   
Congrats, we're both old farts :-)
 And this is not economics this is Marketing 101  
   

No, sorry, it's not marketing when you frame it as you did:

 We do this because at the end of the day infrastructure costs, marketing 
  costs, a whole pile of things cost.  One day some patch or application, 
  which 
  is essential but completely non-sexy could require us to pay a dev on 
  contract 
  and so on and so forth. 

That's economics, pure and simple.  Marketing is trying to make
something attractive to potential purchasers.  A distro doesn't have any
of those.


 You make my point exactly.  The infrastructure costs are fixed, and the
 donor pool will be larger if the user base is larger.  
 
   
 []  If MDV had trumpeted itself as a KDE-only Family (or Education,
 or whatever) distro, and reinforced that by excluding packages and
 infrastructure support for other stuff, I wouldn't have given a dime.
 
 And you miss my point entirely, there is NO trumpeting, that's advertising, 
 there is no exclusion, rather inclusion of a missed market
   

Oh, come on.  Trumpeting and advertising are essentially the same thing,
at last in the context of this discussion.  And what you're advocating
is certainly exclusion; you're saying that we should design and promote
the distro as a fill-in-the-blank distro in order to capture the
mindset of a specific market share, to the implicit exclusion of other
aims if resource limitations encroach.
 I'm a marketing guy not a hacker and I haven't been part of the marketing of 
 OBS, but I seem to remember that OBS packages for a whole heap of distros 
 including even deb based ones. However I may be wrong talk to Jos Poortvliet 
 or Andreas Jaeger on the opensuse lists
   

OK, then maybe we need to look at piggybacking on OBS.  The idea I
floated was an idea, with a suggestion of an implementation.  If there's
a better implementation, that's fine; we can use it. 

 Focus is all about excluding non-essential activities so that a
 company can focus its limited resources on the desires of a specific
 market. 
 
 Focus in this case is about establishing branding, nothing else
   

You're entitled to your definition, as I am mine.  In common parlance
(as well as in this industry) focus (as used by non-developers) very
definitely implied concentrate on this and not that.  That not
branding; it's triage and prioritization.

 I am wondering why you are trying to convince me, this is not my decision, I 
 am merely an idea generator.  I give reasons as to why I believe that this 
 target market is a good one and I foster debate.  My goal is simply to 
 establish criteria for branding, nothing else right now.
   

I'm not sure how seriously to take this.  You post an opinion about
channeling the distro to a specific audience, and when I respond, you
wonder why I'm trying to convince *you* ?  Frankly, I doubt if I *could*
convince you, and it was never my intention to try.  I know an
enthusiast when I read one.   I'm simply participating in the debate you
initiated and want to foster.  Which includes the issue of whether we
need branding at the distro level or not. 

My opinion is that we do not.  Our infrastructure costs will be
relatively fixed, and will be dwarfed by the cost of developer and other
contributor time it will take to maintain Mageia.  The community
resources we will discourage by advertising ourselves as a niche distro
will cost us much more than the infrastructure budget.  So, while I
would concede that your branding argument would make sense if we were
embarking on a commercial venture, I'd have to say that it is pretty low
on the priority list for a community distro.


Re: [Mageia-dev] Identifying Target Markets

2010-10-01 Thread Frederic Janssens
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 00:43, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:


 Yup, the distro that make you become expert, something like that.

 One thing we must not forget is that we need people that contribute if
 we want to survive. A commercial distribution requires money ( and
 therefore users that can bring money , either directly, or either
 indirectly ( service, ads, etc )) to survive. We are not a commercial
 distribution, so the pressure is lower with regard to money. But we
 still to have people that develop it, and if we cannot pay people for
 that directly ( since we are not a company, even if maybe some companies
 will help us later ), we need to directly use contributions as a way to
 ensure our own sustainability.

 SO IMHO, this is what we should seek if we want to survive. Gathering
 contributions should be one of our goals.

 The second point is that we are here because we want community
 empowerment. So community also must be a strong point, especially since
 it will appeal to people that would allow the community to survive.

 So again, I think that empowerment should be another one of the goals.

 Now, we must ask ourself what is pushing people to contribute.
 There is various papers, like this one

 http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1113/1033

 ( I let the analysis as a exercise for the moment ).

 And we need to find a way to combine this with others goals.

 While a traditional motivation in free software is to solve our own
 problem ( and that's also part of community empowerment ), this is not
 enough. We also need to think to more than us. And I think that's the
 complex part.

 We have 2 choices. Either we try to find a market where no one went, or
 a market where someone went, and try to be better. Or maybe both.

 --
 Michael Scherer

 I agree.

One way towards that goal is something I thought about since some years :
lessen the divide between the GUI and CLI approach to computers, and OS's in
particular. And thus between the 'user' and the 'geek' cultures (even if
geeks are users too).

In particular : that the GUI tools, for example the GUI draktools, provide a
link (button) to a short explanation of how they do what they do. For
example : what are the configuration files that are changed, and how.

It could be seen as an extension of what is possible with an icon of the
Panel : a right-click gets you to see what it does : the command is visible.

When I was teaching an introduction to OS's, I used Mandr/ake/iva this way
for
people mainly familiar with Windows : the GUI functions are similar, even if
different, but you can have a 'readable text' access to what really happens.

At first I just told them which configuration files where concerned. Later I
wrote some simple perl scripts using fileschanged  (
http://fileschanged.sourceforge.net/)
to let them find it themselves. But there were many limitations : for
instance KDE configurations are not writen to file directly.

Anyway it would be much more helpful if it is incorporated in the GUI tool
itself (eventually as an option).
It would encourage progressive exploration of the underlying workings.
For anybody, but evidently exploratory behavior is more prevalent in younger
people.

Viewed with some optimism, if this approach is extended, it could lead to an
experience similar to that of people who came to programming through contact
with the early 8 bit microcomputers. (Many people lament the disapearence of
that path of access).

From the 'magic' point of view it would point to : Magea : the School of
Magic

-- 

Frederic


Re: [Mageia-dev] About Mandriva tools future : Host Mandriva tools on github

2010-10-01 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 1 October 2010 12:52, Olivier Blin mag...@blino.org wrote:
 But actually, just moving to git could make contributions easier,
 because of the ability for developpers to commit locally, and push
 incremental patchsets.

It's easier for us developers but more difficult for translators that
learned to use SVN (which was easy for them to swtich from CVS since
the commands were similar)


Re: [Mageia-dev] [Mageia-discuss] About Mandriva tools future : Host Mandriva tools on github

2010-10-01 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 1 October 2010 12:38, Fabrice Facorat fabrice.faco...@gmail.com wrote:
 As we know, one of the Mandriva strenght are the Mandriva tools,
 however Mandriva tools have some issues :
 - they are written in perl. Sorry for perl dev, but I do still think
 that perl is harder to understand than C-like based syntax langages.

That's your point of view. Every programmer will have its own POV.
Thus this is a void argument.

I think an higher language makes the entry barrier smaller for new programmers:
- real algorithms are not in hidden/drown malloc/free spagetti
- no memory bugs
- no security issues b/c of poorly thinked/coded memory management

What's more, with ugtk2  mygtk2 it's easy to express a complex GUI
with a compact
 powerfull dialect which would need 10 times more code to do in C

 However we must admit that we are not going to rewrite all the
 Mandriva tools ;-) However better documentation ( PerlDoc tags ) could
 help a little.

More doc would be better indeed.

 - Mandriva tools are not used by others distributions ( except
 PCLinuxOS, United Linux, and ... Mageia ) and so have few external
 contributions : They notably lack visibility.

void argument: SUSE tools (yast, ...) are only used on SUSE, and the like

 I do think also that Mandriva will have to use its ressources in an
 efficient way.

In the hand, some users will think about us as just as rh or debian,
just packaged by themselves.
We would just remove what makes us different, loosing users.

 5. Junior tasks contributions. I noticed while visiting the
 LibreOffice website. They have junior task for people willing to
 contribute to the codebase, and most of theses junior tasks consist to
 improve code clarity, fix comments. I guess that the same thing could
 be done with Mandriva tools, notably adding perldoc tags/comments.

Indeed. People can start by looking at existing bug reports and dig in code.


Re: [Mageia-dev] About Mandriva tools future : Host Mandriva tools on github

2010-10-01 Thread Fabrice Facorat
2010/10/1 Tux99 tux99-...@uridium.org:
 On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Fabrice Facorat wrote:

 This is about making some decisions about some tools. Some of the
 Mandriva tools have outdate UI, cluttered UI and even are sometimes
 buggy.
 The situation persists since many years already, so at some point we
 should ask ourself : are we going to rewrite them, notably the UI, to
 make them be more 2010, or should we use another tool with another
 GUI.

 Personally I don't see anything wrong with the GUI of the draktools.

there's many things wrong. Just try Wndows 7 or Windows 2008 R2 tools
http://www.win2008r2workstation.com/win2008r2/themes
http://learn.iis.net/page.aspx/29/installing-iis-7-on-windows-server-2008-or-windows-server-2008-r2/
http://www.verboon.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/2010061520h01_291.png
http://4sysops.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/windows-server-2008-r2-bpa.png

 If imrpoving them means to rewrite them from scratch or replace them
 with inferior tools from other distros, then that would be a big effort
 and/or step backwards just for the estetics.

 Substance counts a lot more than appearance to me.

again you're somewhat wrong

iPod and iPhones are inferirors products technically speaking, but
they have better appearance ( good marketing, which is about
appearance ) and so are successful.



-- 
Close the World, Open the Net
http://www.linux-wizard.net


Re: [Mageia-dev] About Mandriva tools future : Host Mandriva tools on github

2010-10-01 Thread Samuel Verschelde

Le vendredi 1 octobre 2010 15:15:26, Fabrice Facorat a écrit :
 iPod and iPhones are inferirors products technically speaking, but
 they have better appearance ( good marketing, which is about
 appearance ) and so are successful.
 

I don't want an iPod or an iPhone.



Re: [Mageia-dev] About Mandriva tools future : Host Mandriva tools on github

2010-10-01 Thread Romain d'Alverny
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 15:15, Fabrice Facorat fabrice.faco...@gmail.com wrote:
 2010/10/1 Tux99 tux99-...@uridium.org:
 Substance counts a lot more than appearance to me.

 again you're somewhat wrong

 iPod and iPhones are inferirors products technically speaking, but
 they have better appearance ( good marketing, which is about
 appearance ) and so are successful.

Appearance is not their only reason to be successful at this time.

Both (substance, appearance) are crucial. If you only consider one
without balancing, making it consistent with the other, you're not
going down the right path. The interface, the whole experience with it
is the product.

Romain


Re: [Mageia-dev] Identifying Target Markets

2010-10-01 Thread Frank Griffin
Graham Lauder wrote:
 On Saturday 02 Oct 2010 01:14:36 Frank Griffin wrote:
   

 And you miss my point entirely, there is NO trumpeting, that's
 advertising, there is no exclusion, rather inclusion of a missed market
   
 Oh, come on.  Trumpeting and advertising are essentially the same thing,
 at last in the context of this discussion. 
 
 Um, that what I said:  That the trumpeting IS advertising... 

Apologies for missing your meaning, but that phrase (there is NO
trumpeting, that's advertising) can be read two different ways
depending upon what you take that's to be modifying, i.e. trumpeting
or what you're advocating.



 You're reading a hell of a lot more in there than I put. You seem to be 
 talking at cross purposes.  When I say inclusion I mean inclusion of another 
 market that hasn't been catered to before.   You're talking about packages, 
 I'm talking about people. 
   

No, your original post talked about packages, to quote:



So for instance as well as the standard software, educational programmes would 
be installed by default, be NetSafe (Dans Guardian), have OOo4Kids installed 
as well as a full office suite, Tuxtype, TuxPaint and so on.

Documentation added to show parents how to set up accounts for the kids and 
how to make it Net safe.


That is a clear recommendation to configure the distro for that target
audience.  Installing a lot of kid-friendly packages implies they have
to be in the ISOs, which means that some other packages won't be.


 Now I'm convinced we're not talking about the same thing.

 You seem to think we are wanting to embark on some global advertising campaign

 And all I want is to decide what colour pallet  our logo and webpage should 
 use.  By figuring out what a primary target market is we can then figure out 
 the colours that will suit that demographic.  That's it Simple!
   

As I pointed out above, you advocated targeting the distribution
*itself* to a niche market.  I really have no interest in what colors
the website uses; my replies were prompted because I have lots of
interest in what the distro contains.



Re: [Mageia-dev] Identifying Target Markets

2010-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
2010/10/1 Graham Lauder yori...@openoffice.org:

 OK then let me put it another way, you have taught IT for 15 years.

Teaching IT was only the smallest part. I was involved in selling,
purchasing, advising - the whole area, not just that small marketing
section. And I talked to people all over the country, including
international events, not just one special geografic area like NZ.
Western Europe is a mix of many different areas, not just one.
So pls do not try to talk to me like you know it all.

 LOL, in fact you can, at the end of the day it is a consumer item.  It is a
 luxury good that only a small proportion of the worlds population can afford.
 In capitalist consumer model societies the market has little variation apart
 from local fashion. So for instance, like McDs,  Ipods and Iphones are sold
 the same way world wide and that is matched with other global brands.

Wrong, Here it depends on which item it is who makes the decisions in
a family. Over here Mom may decide in general whethere a purchase is
made or not but concerning computers and software the kids or Dad
decide what is bought. The wife just wants to use it.

 As I pointed out above your experience is in fact limited, that's not a bad
 thing, it means you can target those variations that the global brands ignore
 in a local market.

Same applies to you if you want to put it that way. Your sample is
really small concerning German imigrants. Why do you think they
emigrated from Germany? Because they were the typical Germans? Sounds
like I saw a German wearing a hat, all Germans wear hats. thing. I
know some people from NZ but I would never judge all NZ by those few.

 However our need is to be a global brand and so we target
 demographics that we know exist every where.  So for instance: Parents
 everywhere, no matter what country or society, want the best for their Kids...
 simple really.

Simple but not related. It's related to clothing, food, whatever, not
to the technical stuff. While there is not much trouble with parents
when clothing or schooling is related, we do have an ongoing
discussion in Germany about the problem that parents do not care what
their children do with computers (ego shooters, facebook, etc.)
because the kids know more about computers.

Anyhow, I made my points.

wobo


Re: [Mageia-dev] About Mandriva tools future : Host Mandriva tools on github

2010-10-01 Thread Juan Luis Baptiste
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Samuel Verschelde sto...@laposte.net wrote:

 I don't want an iPod or an iPhone.


I do but they're so expensive :P


-- 
Juancho