Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-12 Thread Marja van Waes

On 11/01/12 21:13, nicolas vigier wrote:

On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Marja van Waes wrote:


I can't talk for that minority, of course. However, I can talk for myself:

In such circumstances it is very possible that I'd agree to do something to
later find out I can't concentrate on the task no matter how hard I try.

I regret it wasn't decided that the people who wanted unlimited edit time
should make the MOD, after which the unlimited edit time would be
implemented. They were going to get what they wanted (the unlimited edit
time), wouldn't that have given them wings to do that MOD?

I think unlimited edit time should be enabled, but there is no need for
a MOD. Creating a MOD to keep history of post edits is not really trivial,
and could be difficult to maintain in the future. If we really want this
feature, it would probably be better to have it implemented in upstream
phpbb before we use it.

But the main problem is not edit time, I don't really care about edit
time myself. The main problem is that there seems to be a majority of
people who think it should be enabled, that there is no good reason to
not do it, or at least try it for a few months (as was proposed several
times by different people), but it is still not done, because someone
decided it shouldn't be done. It could have been enabled in 2 minutes
8 months ago and we would have avoided those endless debates.

This issue is about a seeming majority of people wanting a certain 
feature. It is not about a buggy forum. It is about an enhancement, that 
isn't even an enhancement in everybody's eyes.


Maintainers of packages have the freedom to refuse to do an enhancement 
request https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Bug_policy#Enhancement_requests

Maintainers can refuse regardless of what reason they have to refuse.

Why don't we give the maât the same right for the unlimited edit time 
request?


Moreover, in article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights it 
says:

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights#Article_18

This article was of course written for all those cases when someone has 
different thoughts, conscience and/or religion than we have.


It is evident from what maât wrote, that he is convinced the edit time 
should stay very limited. Why do we ignore the universal declaration of 
human rights and try to force him to do something that is against his 
conscience?


Regards,
Marja




Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-12 Thread nicolas vigier
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Marja van Waes wrote:


 It is evident from what maât wrote, that he is convinced the edit time 
 should stay very limited. Why do we ignore the universal declaration of 
 human rights and try to force him to do something that is against his 
 conscience?

Because it's Mageia's forum, not his forum.

And this has nothing to do with human rights ...



Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-12 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
2012/1/12 Marja van Waes marj...@xs4all.nl:

 Moreover, in article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights it
 says:
 Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion...
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights#Article_18

Yes, so why do you deny these right sto the majority of the forum people?

 This article was of course written for all those cases when someone has
 different thoughts, conscience and/or religion than we have.

 It is evident from what maāt wrote, that he is convinced the edit time
 should stay very limited. Why do we ignore the universal declaration of
 human rights and try to force him to do something that is against his
 conscience?

I guess you agree that those principles where written with the spirit
of democracy behind it all - so you agree also that those declarations
do not say that one has the right to force his opinion on all others.

As I wrote in the bug report: we will hopefully see a decision about
this in next council meeting to close this discussion for good.

-- 
wobo


Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-12 Thread Marja van Waes

On 12/01/12 15:48, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:

2012/1/12 Marja van Waesmarj...@xs4all.nl:

Moreover, in article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights it
says:
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights#Article_18

Yes, so why do you deny these right sto the majority of the forum people?


I don't :)
I don't even deny it when our seeming majority would turn out to be a 
minority.


Please be careful with the words the majority, we don't have a good 
tool yet to know what everybody wants.


That would mean: inform everybody in the Mageia community in a factual 
way about the different points of view and then let them vote 
anonymously. Too many users don't see the polls, I think it would be 
better to have them on www.mageia.org, instead of hidden in forum threads.


It would be good to make sure there isn't a different, silent majority 
here.




This article was of course written for all those cases when someone has
different thoughts, conscience and/or religion than we have.

  It is evident from what maāt wrote, that he is convinced the edit time

should stay very limited. Why do we ignore the universal declaration of
human rights and try to force him to do something that is against his
conscience?

I guess you agree that those principles where written with the spirit
of democracy behind it all - so you agree also that those declarations
do not say that one has the right to force his opinion on all others.


Of course not. Funny that you seem to think maât did that, I didn't see 
him force anyone to use the forum as it is.





As I wrote in the bug report: we will hopefully see a decision about
this in next council meeting to close this discussion for good


Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-12 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
2012/1/12 Marja van Waes marj...@xs4all.nl:
 On 12/01/12 15:48, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:

 2012/1/12 Marja van Waesmarj...@xs4all.nl:

 Moreover, in article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights it
 says:
 Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and
 religion...

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights#Article_18

 Yes, so why do you deny these right sto the majority of the forum people?

 I don't :)
 I don't even deny it when our seeming majority would turn out to be a
 minority.

 Please be careful with the words the majority, we don't have a good tool
 yet to know what everybody wants.

Hmm, from the people who participated in the initial discussion which
led to the council compromise I count 2 in favor of the limitation,
the rest against it. This I call a majority.
During the 8 months since we have this issue I read lots of complaints
about the limitation, I did not read any post in favor of it. This is
what I call a majority.

In an election or a poll (a democratic process) how much weight do
those have who do not give their vote? In every election there is a
number of people who do not vote, either because they don't care or
none of the given options is to their liking. But I haven't seen an
election or poll where the silent number was counted in favor for
one side or the other. So, if you are talking about the silent
majority I can ask you rightfully, on which side the silent majority
would be.


 I guess you agree that those principles where written with the spirit
 of democracy behind it all - so you agree also that those declarations
 do not say that one has the right to force his opinion on all others.


 Of course not. Funny that you seem to think maât did that, I didn't see him
 force anyone to use the forum as it is.

Then you think that his behavior is ok and everybody who doesn't like
it can leave? That is not funny. It is against all that Mageia stands
for.
I think we do not have different opinions, we are living in different worlds.

-- 
wobo


Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-12 Thread Marja van Waes

On 12/01/12 17:47, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:

2012/1/12 Marja van Waesmarj...@xs4all.nl:

On 12/01/12 15:48, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:

2012/1/12 Marja van Waesmarj...@xs4all.nl:

Moreover, in article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights it
says:
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and
religion...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights#Article_18

Yes, so why do you deny these right sto the majority of the forum people?


I don't :)
I don't even deny it when our seeming majority would turn out to be a
minority.

Please be careful with the words the majority, we don't have a good tool
yet to know what everybody wants.

Hmm, from the people who participated in the initial discussion which
led to the council compromise I count 2 in favor of the limitation,
the rest against it. This I call a majority.
During the 8 months since we have this issue I read lots of complaints
about the limitation, I did not read any post in favor of it. This is
what I call a majority.


I don't.

There are a forum thread and a bug report with a lot of harsh words, and 
only a minority of the Mageia community participated. It is possible 
that the angry majority there has the same opinion as the real majority, 
but we don't know yet.




In an election or a poll (a democratic process) how much weight do
those have who do not give their vote? In every election there is a
number of people who do not vote, either because they don't care or
none of the given options is to their liking. But I haven't seen an
election or poll where the silent number was counted in favor for
one side or the other. So, if you are talking about the silent
majority I can ask you rightfully, on which side the silent majority
would be.


I was not clear, sorry.

IMHO, if every Mageia community member had received an invitation to 
vote in a virtual polling station, seperated from the emotional forum 
thread about the issue, there would have been a lot more votes.


* It is well known that people can vote differently when there votes are 
seen then when they are not seen.
* Also a thread where such harsh words are said, makes some people run 
away, and others reluctant to say what they think, for fear everything 
might escalate further.
* Apart from that, there are community members who never were aware this 
thread was there

* and others were, but didn't know it was the place to vote.

Of course I don't know what outcome a proper democratic voting would 
have given.

I guess you agree that those principles where written with the spirit
of democracy behind it all - so you agree also that those declarations
do not say that one has the right to force his opinion on all others.


Of course not. Funny that you seem to think maât did that, I didn't see him
force anyone to use the forum as it is.

Then you think that his behavior is ok and everybody who doesn't like
it can leave? That is not funny. It is against all that Mageia stands
for.
I think we do not have different opinions, we are living in different worlds.



I think that if a real majority wants a forum with unlimited edit time, 
that we should have it.


My point is, that Maât isn't our slave, we can't force him to do it, never.

So then it would be necessary to look for someone else to take Maât's 
place.


I hope that if that happens, we'll at least manage to be nice to him and 
thank him for the work he has done.








Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-11 Thread Marja van Waes

On 03/01/12 10:09, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:

2012/1/3 Michael Schererm...@zarb.org:

Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 22:17 +0100, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :

Op maandag 02 januari 2012 21:40:31 schreef Michael Scherer:

Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 19:41 +0100, Marja van Waes a écrit :

Hi everyone,

Can someone please help to fix bug 1956?

You don't need to be a regular forum visitor.

We need someone to find and implement a probably existing MOD,  needed
to keep forum posts history when unlimited edit time is enabled

  From wobo's comment #32:
Capabilities needed:
Well, one could say that anybody who

   - knows how to run phpBB as admin and
   - has seen a line of php
   - knows how to edit code (respecting tags and such)
   - knows how to cutpaste

should be able to install an existing MOD (if I'm not mistaken there is
one or more).

I know next to nothing about php coding. But I've been running a phpBB
forum for a couple of years and successfully implemented some MODs in
phpBB2 and phpBB3. With no help (except the phpBB-forum in case of
problems).

In practice you have a detailed installation README for each MOD. Like

   - open file /foo/bar/doo.php
   - Find the line which starts with '..'
   - After that add
   - .

And more such step-by-step guidance

My eyes start to bleed dues to such guidances.

i'm sure misc means to say that we should have all our changes in
packages/puppet config so that we can update without issues. and with file
edits, that's a whole different thing.

I was more thinking of proper patchs or better, proper modules, with
files to deploy in a well know directory .

I only gave a part of an example. MODs are made as enhancement to the
standard software. The easiest MOD is like Michael wrote: a module
with files to deploy in a well known directory. But in most cases
they consist of files to copy into various directories of the program
tree and changes to existing files of the software. There are other
MODs which can be implemented automatically - which is far worse IMHO.
This is where a modded phpBB3 could turn into a nightmare to maintain
- believe me, I've been there :(

Of course no developper of a MOD could know what somebody has already
done to the standard files, so it's not possible do use only patches.
And it could be (and that happens quite often) that a MOD is not
compatible to your already modificated forum software (destroys
other modifications or whatever).

IMHO the best way in this case here would be a mod written for our
setup, all changes well defined to make it maintainable in a proper
way. Saying this I beg to think again whether the issue  justifies all
the time and work.

It would make me very, very happy, does that count a little? If I were 
sure that I'd be able to learn how to do it, I would now consider to 
halve the time I use for the Bug Squad and Doc Team and start learning.


Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-11 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
2012/1/11 Marja van Waes marj...@xs4all.nl:
 On 03/01/12 10:09, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:

 2012/1/3 Michael Schererm...@zarb.org:

 Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 22:17 +0100, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :

 Op maandag 02 januari 2012 21:40:31 schreef Michael Scherer:

 Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 19:41 +0100, Marja van Waes a écrit :

 Hi everyone,

 Can someone please help to fix bug 1956?

 You don't need to be a regular forum visitor.

 We need someone to find and implement a probably existing MOD,  needed
 to keep forum posts history when unlimited edit time is enabled

  From wobo's comment #32:
 Capabilities needed:
 Well, one could say that anybody who

   - knows how to run phpBB as admin and
   - has seen a line of php
   - knows how to edit code (respecting tags and such)
   - knows how to cutpaste

 should be able to install an existing MOD (if I'm not mistaken there
 is
 one or more).

 I know next to nothing about php coding. But I've been running a phpBB
 forum for a couple of years and successfully implemented some MODs in
 phpBB2 and phpBB3. With no help (except the phpBB-forum in case of
 problems).

 In practice you have a detailed installation README for each MOD. Like

   - open file /foo/bar/doo.php
   - Find the line which starts with '..'
   - After that add
   - .

 And more such step-by-step guidance

 My eyes start to bleed dues to such guidances.

 i'm sure misc means to say that we should have all our changes in
 packages/puppet config so that we can update without issues. and with
 file
 edits, that's a whole different thing.

 I was more thinking of proper patchs or better, proper modules, with
 files to deploy in a well know directory .

 I only gave a part of an example. MODs are made as enhancement to the
 standard software. The easiest MOD is like Michael wrote: a module
 with files to deploy in a well known directory. But in most cases
 they consist of files to copy into various directories of the program
 tree and changes to existing files of the software. There are other
 MODs which can be implemented automatically - which is far worse IMHO.
 This is where a modded phpBB3 could turn into a nightmare to maintain
 - believe me, I've been there :(

 Of course no developper of a MOD could know what somebody has already
 done to the standard files, so it's not possible do use only patches.
 And it could be (and that happens quite often) that a MOD is not
 compatible to your already modificated forum software (destroys
 other modifications or whatever).

 IMHO the best way in this case here would be a mod written for our
 setup, all changes well defined to make it maintainable in a proper
 way. Saying this I beg to think again whether the issue  justifies all
 the time and work.

 It would make me very, very happy, does that count a little? If I were sure
 that I'd be able to learn how to do it, I would now consider to halve the
 time I use for the Bug Squad and Doc Team and start learning.

Why? IMHO this complete issue is going out of proportions. Let's
remember why we *seem to need* this MOD in the first place. And what
will we find? The time-to-edit discussion, again. In the council
meeting where it was decided to have this mod It looked as the best
way to please a disturbing minority request, the more as that same
minority gave the impression that such a MOD could be implemented
within a reasonable time span. As we see now after 8 months, this was
never the case.

Adding the fact that a test period of several months with a much
looser time-to-edit setting in the German Mageia forum showed not one
single case of misuse brings me to the conviction that we should
rather rethink the time-to-edit limitation itself than to waste
manpower on this issue. Manpower which is needed at more important
tasks, if I may say.

-- 
wobo


Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-11 Thread Oliver Burger
Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2012, 10:54:58 schrieb Wolfgang Bornath:
 Why? IMHO this complete issue is going out of proportions. Let's
 remember why we *seem to need* this MOD in the first place. And what
 will we find? The time-to-edit discussion, again. In the council
 meeting where it was decided to have this mod It looked as the best
 way to please a disturbing minority request, the more as that same
 minority gave the impression that such a MOD could be implemented
 within a reasonable time span. As we see now after 8 months, this was
 never the case.
 
 Adding the fact that a test period of several months with a much
 looser time-to-edit setting in the German Mageia forum showed not one
 single case of misuse brings me to the conviction that we should
 rather rethink the time-to-edit limitation itself than to waste
 manpower on this issue. Manpower which is needed at more important
 tasks, if I may say.

+1


Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-11 Thread Florian Hubold
Am 11.01.2012 10:54, schrieb Wolfgang Bornath:
 2012/1/11 Marja van Waes marj...@xs4all.nl:
 On 03/01/12 10:09, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
 2012/1/3 Michael Schererm...@zarb.org:
 Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 22:17 +0100, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
 Op maandag 02 januari 2012 21:40:31 schreef Michael Scherer:
 Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 19:41 +0100, Marja van Waes a écrit :
 Hi everyone,

 Can someone please help to fix bug 1956?

 You don't need to be a regular forum visitor.

 We need someone to find and implement a probably existing MOD,  needed
 to keep forum posts history when unlimited edit time is enabled

  From wobo's comment #32:
 Capabilities needed:
 Well, one could say that anybody who

   - knows how to run phpBB as admin and
   - has seen a line of php
   - knows how to edit code (respecting tags and such)
   - knows how to cutpaste

 should be able to install an existing MOD (if I'm not mistaken there
 is
 one or more).

 I know next to nothing about php coding. But I've been running a phpBB
 forum for a couple of years and successfully implemented some MODs in
 phpBB2 and phpBB3. With no help (except the phpBB-forum in case of
 problems).

 In practice you have a detailed installation README for each MOD. Like

   - open file /foo/bar/doo.php
   - Find the line which starts with '..'
   - After that add
   - .

 And more such step-by-step guidance
 My eyes start to bleed dues to such guidances.
 i'm sure misc means to say that we should have all our changes in
 packages/puppet config so that we can update without issues. and with
 file
 edits, that's a whole different thing.
 I was more thinking of proper patchs or better, proper modules, with
 files to deploy in a well know directory .
 I only gave a part of an example. MODs are made as enhancement to the
 standard software. The easiest MOD is like Michael wrote: a module
 with files to deploy in a well known directory. But in most cases
 they consist of files to copy into various directories of the program
 tree and changes to existing files of the software. There are other
 MODs which can be implemented automatically - which is far worse IMHO.
 This is where a modded phpBB3 could turn into a nightmare to maintain
 - believe me, I've been there :(

 Of course no developper of a MOD could know what somebody has already
 done to the standard files, so it's not possible do use only patches.
 And it could be (and that happens quite often) that a MOD is not
 compatible to your already modificated forum software (destroys
 other modifications or whatever).

 IMHO the best way in this case here would be a mod written for our
 setup, all changes well defined to make it maintainable in a proper
 way. Saying this I beg to think again whether the issue  justifies all
 the time and work.

 It would make me very, very happy, does that count a little? If I were sure
 that I'd be able to learn how to do it, I would now consider to halve the
 time I use for the Bug Squad and Doc Team and start learning.
 Why? IMHO this complete issue is going out of proportions. Let's
 remember why we *seem to need* this MOD in the first place. And what
 will we find? The time-to-edit discussion, again. In the council
 meeting where it was decided to have this mod It looked as the best
 way to please a disturbing minority request, the more as that same
 minority gave the impression that such a MOD could be implemented
 within a reasonable time span. As we see now after 8 months, this was
 never the case.

 Adding the fact that a test period of several months with a much
 looser time-to-edit setting in the German Mageia forum showed not one
 single case of misuse brings me to the conviction that we should
 rather rethink the time-to-edit limitation itself than to waste
 manpower on this issue. Manpower which is needed at more important
 tasks, if I may say.

In general i don't like those +1 posts, but this ^^ one hits the nail on the 
head.
+1


Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-11 Thread Marja van Waes

On 11/01/12 10:54, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:

2012/1/11 Marja van Waesmarj...@xs4all.nl:

On 03/01/12 10:09, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:



Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 19:41 +0100, Marja van Waes a écrit :

Hi everyone,

Can someone please help to fix bug 1956?



IMHO the best way in this case here would be a mod written for our
setup, all changes well defined to make it maintainable in a proper
way. Saying this I beg to think again whether the issue  justifies all
the time and work.


It would make me very, very happy, does that count a little? If I were sure
that I'd be able to learn how to do it, I would now consider to halve the
time I use for the Bug Squad and Doc Team and start learning.

Why? IMHO this complete issue is going out of proportions. Let's
remember why we *seem to need* this MOD in the first place. And what
will we find? The time-to-edit discussion, again. In the council
meeting where it was decided to have this mod It looked as the best
way to please a disturbing minority request, the more as that same
minority gave the impression that such a MOD could be implemented
within a reasonable time span. As we see now after 8 months, this was
never the case.


I can't talk for that minority, of course. However, I can talk for myself:

In such circumstances it is very possible that I'd agree to do something 
to later find out I can't concentrate on the task no matter how hard I try.


I regret it wasn't decided that the people who wanted unlimited edit 
time should make the MOD, after which the unlimited edit time would be 
implemented. They were going to get what they wanted (the unlimited edit 
time), wouldn't that have given them wings to do that MOD?



Regards,

Marja


Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-11 Thread nicolas vigier
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Marja van Waes wrote:


 I can't talk for that minority, of course. However, I can talk for myself:

 In such circumstances it is very possible that I'd agree to do something to 
 later find out I can't concentrate on the task no matter how hard I try.

 I regret it wasn't decided that the people who wanted unlimited edit time 
 should make the MOD, after which the unlimited edit time would be 
 implemented. They were going to get what they wanted (the unlimited edit 
 time), wouldn't that have given them wings to do that MOD?

I think unlimited edit time should be enabled, but there is no need for
a MOD. Creating a MOD to keep history of post edits is not really trivial,
and could be difficult to maintain in the future. If we really want this
feature, it would probably be better to have it implemented in upstream
phpbb before we use it.

But the main problem is not edit time, I don't really care about edit
time myself. The main problem is that there seems to be a majority of
people who think it should be enabled, that there is no good reason to
not do it, or at least try it for a few months (as was proposed several
times by different people), but it is still not done, because someone
decided it shouldn't be done. It could have been enabled in 2 minutes
8 months ago and we would have avoided those endless debates.



Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-11 Thread Maarten Vanraes
Op woensdag 11 januari 2012 21:13:50 schreef nicolas vigier:
[...]
 But the main problem is not edit time, I don't really care about edit
 time myself. The main problem is that there seems to be a majority of
 people who think it should be enabled, that there is no good reason to
 not do it, or at least try it for a few months (as was proposed several
 times by different people), but it is still not done, because someone
 decided it shouldn't be done. It could have been enabled in 2 minutes
 8 months ago and we would have avoided those endless debates.

in retrospect, i agree with you on this


Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-11 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
2012/1/11 Maarten Vanraes al...@rmail.be:
 Op woensdag 11 januari 2012 21:13:50 schreef nicolas vigier:
 [...]
 But the main problem is not edit time, I don't really care about edit
 time myself. The main problem is that there seems to be a majority of
 people who think it should be enabled, that there is no good reason to
 not do it, or at least try it for a few months (as was proposed several
 times by different people), but it is still not done, because someone
 decided it shouldn't be done. It could have been enabled in 2 minutes
 8 months ago and we would have avoided those endless debates.

 in retrospect, i agree with you on this

That's why I wrote what I wrote. :)
A great majority wants no limitation of time-to-edit so it should be
set instead of telling that majority something like If you want it,
develop that MOD, then you can have what you want. - at least
everything I know about democratic decisions tells me that.

I think I have made my point of view clear, 'nuff said.

-- 
wobo


Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-11 Thread Romain d'Alverny
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 21:13, nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org wrote:
 The main problem is that there seems to be a majority of
 people who think it should be enabled, that there is no good reason to
 not do it, or at least try it for a few months (as was proposed several
 times by different people), but it is still not done, because someone
 decided it shouldn't be done. It could have been enabled in 2 minutes
 8 months ago and we would have avoided those endless debates.

So it goes back to a Council discussion/decision, where the above was
decided. Next Monday meeting.


Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-03 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
2012/1/3 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
 Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 22:17 +0100, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
 Op maandag 02 januari 2012 21:40:31 schreef Michael Scherer:
  Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 19:41 +0100, Marja van Waes a écrit :
   Hi everyone,
  
   Can someone please help to fix bug 1956?
  
   You don't need to be a regular forum visitor.
  
   We need someone to find and implement a probably existing MOD,  needed
   to keep forum posts history when unlimited edit time is enabled
  
    From wobo's comment #32:
   Capabilities needed:
   Well, one could say that anybody who
  
     - knows how to run phpBB as admin and
     - has seen a line of php
     - knows how to edit code (respecting tags and such)
     - knows how to cutpaste
  
   should be able to install an existing MOD (if I'm not mistaken there is
   one or more).
  
   I know next to nothing about php coding. But I've been running a phpBB
   forum for a couple of years and successfully implemented some MODs in
   phpBB2 and phpBB3. With no help (except the phpBB-forum in case of
   problems).
  
   In practice you have a detailed installation README for each MOD. Like
  
     - open file /foo/bar/doo.php
     - Find the line which starts with '..'
     - After that add
     - .
  
   And more such step-by-step guidance
 
  My eyes start to bleed dues to such guidances.

 i'm sure misc means to say that we should have all our changes in
 packages/puppet config so that we can update without issues. and with file
 edits, that's a whole different thing.

 I was more thinking of proper patchs or better, proper modules, with
 files to deploy in a well know directory .

I only gave a part of an example. MODs are made as enhancement to the
standard software. The easiest MOD is like Michael wrote: a module
with files to deploy in a well known directory. But in most cases
they consist of files to copy into various directories of the program
tree and changes to existing files of the software. There are other
MODs which can be implemented automatically - which is far worse IMHO.
This is where a modded phpBB3 could turn into a nightmare to maintain
- believe me, I've been there :(

Of course no developper of a MOD could know what somebody has already
done to the standard files, so it's not possible do use only patches.
And it could be (and that happens quite often) that a MOD is not
compatible to your already modificated forum software (destroys
other modifications or whatever).

IMHO the best way in this case here would be a mod written for our
setup, all changes well defined to make it maintainable in a proper
way. Saying this I beg to think again whether the issue  justifies all
the time and work.

-- 
wobo


Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-03 Thread AL13N
 2012/1/3 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
[...]
 I was more thinking of proper patchs or better, proper modules, with
 files to deploy in a well know directory .

 I only gave a part of an example. MODs are made as enhancement to the
 standard software. The easiest MOD is like Michael wrote: a module
 with files to deploy in a well known directory. But in most cases
 they consist of files to copy into various directories of the program
 tree and changes to existing files of the software. There are other
 MODs which can be implemented automatically - which is far worse IMHO.
 This is where a modded phpBB3 could turn into a nightmare to maintain
 - believe me, I've been there :(

/o\

 Of course no developper of a MOD could know what somebody has already
 done to the standard files, so it's not possible do use only patches.
 And it could be (and that happens quite often) that a MOD is not
 compatible to your already modificated forum software (destroys
 other modifications or whatever).

 IMHO the best way in this case here would be a mod written for our
 setup, all changes well defined to make it maintainable in a proper
 way. Saying this I beg to think again whether the issue  justifies all
 the time and work.

+1


Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-02 Thread Michael Scherer
Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 19:41 +0100, Marja van Waes a écrit :
 Hi everyone,
 
 Can someone please help to fix bug 1956?
 
 You don't need to be a regular forum visitor.
 
 We need someone to find and implement a probably existing MOD,  needed 
 to keep forum posts history when unlimited edit time is enabled
 
  From wobo's comment #32:
 
 Capabilities needed:
 Well, one could say that anybody who
   - knows how to run phpBB as admin and
   - has seen a line of php
   - knows how to edit code (respecting tags and such)
   - knows how to cutpaste
 should be able to install an existing MOD (if I'm not mistaken there is one or
 more).
 
 I know next to nothing about php coding. But I've been running a phpBB forum
 for a couple of years and successfully implemented some MODs in phpBB2 and
 phpBB3. With no help (except the phpBB-forum in case of problems).
 
 In practice you have a detailed installation README for each MOD. Like
   - open file /foo/bar/doo.php
   - Find the line which starts with '..'
   - After that add
   - .
 And more such step-by-step guidance

My eyes start to bleed dues to such guidances.

-- 
Michael Scherer



Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-02 Thread Maarten Vanraes
Op maandag 02 januari 2012 21:40:31 schreef Michael Scherer:
 Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 19:41 +0100, Marja van Waes a écrit :
  Hi everyone,
  
  Can someone please help to fix bug 1956?
  
  You don't need to be a regular forum visitor.
  
  We need someone to find and implement a probably existing MOD,  needed
  to keep forum posts history when unlimited edit time is enabled
  
   From wobo's comment #32:
  Capabilities needed:
  Well, one could say that anybody who
  
- knows how to run phpBB as admin and
- has seen a line of php
- knows how to edit code (respecting tags and such)
- knows how to cutpaste
  
  should be able to install an existing MOD (if I'm not mistaken there is
  one or more).
  
  I know next to nothing about php coding. But I've been running a phpBB
  forum for a couple of years and successfully implemented some MODs in
  phpBB2 and phpBB3. With no help (except the phpBB-forum in case of
  problems).
  
  In practice you have a detailed installation README for each MOD. Like
  
- open file /foo/bar/doo.php
- Find the line which starts with '..'
- After that add
- .
  
  And more such step-by-step guidance
 
 My eyes start to bleed dues to such guidances.

i'm sure misc means to say that we should have all our changes in 
packages/puppet config so that we can update without issues. and with file 
edits, that's a whole different thing.


Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-02 Thread Michael Scherer
Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 22:17 +0100, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
 Op maandag 02 januari 2012 21:40:31 schreef Michael Scherer:
  Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 19:41 +0100, Marja van Waes a écrit :
   Hi everyone,
   
   Can someone please help to fix bug 1956?
   
   You don't need to be a regular forum visitor.
   
   We need someone to find and implement a probably existing MOD,  needed
   to keep forum posts history when unlimited edit time is enabled
   
From wobo's comment #32:
   Capabilities needed:
   Well, one could say that anybody who
   
 - knows how to run phpBB as admin and
 - has seen a line of php
 - knows how to edit code (respecting tags and such)
 - knows how to cutpaste
   
   should be able to install an existing MOD (if I'm not mistaken there is
   one or more).
   
   I know next to nothing about php coding. But I've been running a phpBB
   forum for a couple of years and successfully implemented some MODs in
   phpBB2 and phpBB3. With no help (except the phpBB-forum in case of
   problems).
   
   In practice you have a detailed installation README for each MOD. Like
   
 - open file /foo/bar/doo.php
 - Find the line which starts with '..'
 - After that add
 - .
   
   And more such step-by-step guidance
  
  My eyes start to bleed dues to such guidances.
 
 i'm sure misc means to say that we should have all our changes in 
 packages/puppet config so that we can update without issues. and with file 
 edits, that's a whole different thing.

I was more thinking of proper patchs or better, proper modules, with
files to deploy in a well know directory .

Something that do not remind me of Alien 4 movie.
-- 
Michael Scherer



Re: [Mageia-dev] PHP + phpBB mod capabilities needed to fix bug 1956 - please help

2012-01-02 Thread Maarten Vanraes
Op dinsdag 03 januari 2012 00:46:39 schreef Michael Scherer:
[...]
 Something that do not remind me of Alien 4 movie.

hey now! no insulting :-) that's a great movie! a bit of a mess at times, but 
a great movie!