Re: [Mailman-Users] Automatic subscription based on e-mail subject

2019-02-02 Thread William Bagwell
On Saturday 02 February 2019, Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users wrote:
> I feel like Mailman's "Topic" feature is under utilized.  :-/

Agreed! Oddly none of the 'techie' lists I have ever been on enable this 
feature. Couple of critter lists that started on Listserve and moved to 
Mailman do. First learned of Mailman back in 2001 when one of then switched 
to 2.0.6. 

BTW do not see a "Keywords: header." but do see an X-Topics: FOO. With FOO: 
also appearing in the Subject header. 
-- 
William
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] cause of bounces

2017-10-19 Thread William Bagwell
On Thursday 19 October 2017, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> As Mark says, they should use an @sysadmins.irs.gov address or
> something like that, which would have its own p=none policy.  Note
> that this has been already standard practice at Yahoo! (!), AOL (!!),
> LinkedIn, and several banks that participate in IETF discussions.
> Since 2013 for Yahoo! and LinkedIn IIRC.

So if enough users of Yahoo and AOL requested something such as 
u...@list.aol.com to not be DMARC p=reject they /might/ listen?

Only list I help administer the owner simply moderates the few remaining hold 
outs who can not switch and manually re-posts their messages. Would not have 
worked back when the list was busy... Think I now understand the correct fix 
but did not a few years ago when this mess started and that was the solution 
we came up with.
-- 
William
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Find a smtp server to send out emails

2016-12-07 Thread William Bagwell
On Wednesday 07 December 2016, Dominik Hoffmann wrote:
> Ever since my ISP, Verizon, quit relaying email messages from addresses
> not ending in @verizon.net, I have been exploring SMTP alternatives. I
> haven't come to a conclusion, but I found an interesting list at
>
> https://www.formget.com/smtp-service-providers/

I think Leon has his answer, but if you can live with a strict limit of 1,000 
emails per hour a tiny plan at A Small Orange might meet your needs. I have 
the slightly larger small plan which runs $5 per month and have no problem 
sending my ISP address emails outbound through them. This had the added 
benefit of avoiding the Gmail problem of not seeing your own posts to lists 
during the ~five years my ISP outsourced to Gmail. 

Anyone hosting a discusion list should keep in mind that a list with 100 (non 
digest) members would exceed the limit with just 11 posts in one hour. The 
list I help with is split in half on two diffrent plans due to hitting this 
limit years ago. We were prepared to split it into three parts but that 
never proved necessary. 
-- 
William

--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Why do some get digests as a series of attachments?

2016-09-03 Thread William Bagwell
On Friday 02 September 2016, Richard Johnson wrote:
> This is strange.  One of my list users gets digest messages as a series of
> attachments, while all other users receive digests as all text, with the
> messages one after the other.
>
> The person who gets the attachments has a Cox.net address.  Maybe they're
> doing something to it?

Remote possibility is the users mail reader is bursting digests back to 
individual messages. These will have minimal headers, look different and 
might be mistaken for attachments. Forte Agent defaults to this behavior. 
-- 
William
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Remove individual msgs from archive

2016-06-15 Thread William Bagwell
On Wednesday 15 June 2016, John Poltorak wrote:
> Is it possible via the admin interface to remove individual msgs from an
> archive?
>
> There is always the chance that something inappropriate gets posted and
> isn't immediately spotted. Or even if it is spotted straight after it has
> been posted...

Pretty sure the answer is still no. Requested this myself about six years 
ago. Have hope we will get this ability in Mailman 3! 
-- 
William
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Message may contain ... administrivia?

2015-10-01 Thread William Bagwell
On Thursday 01 October 2015, Bryan Blackwell wrote:
> Probably just as well to turn them off, most people use the web interface
> nowadays and have for some time.

Very long time for some of us, almost got kicked off of a mailing list about 
15 years ago when I discovered List Serve had added a web interface before 
the list owner knew. Accused me of 'hacking' :-O Same guy later moved that 
list to Mailman 2.0.6 which was how I learned of its existence.
-- 
William
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] What would your dream Mailman web interface look like?

2015-04-08 Thread William Bagwell
On Monday 06 April 2015, JB wrote:
 Ive been gathering that based on the research I have been doing.  I am
 REALLY looking forward to the new version.  As soon as it is out I will
 have to put in a feature request to the cPanle folks to make the upgrade
 ASAP.  As an FYI, they are tad behind the times with MM.  Their last
 upgrade was this...

 Change Log for 11.44.0.2
 Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:35 AM
 Fixed case 99393: Updated mailman to 2.1.18-1.

My web hosting upgraded from 2.1.17 to 2.1.18-1 on June 5 2014 so I'm 
assuming cPanle customers (not end users like me) can upgrade Mailman when 
they chose?

In any case plan to ask my host to request 3.0 in parallel with 2.1 if 
possible. Itching to get a test install up!
-- 
William
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] The right way to reply to a mailing list

2015-03-22 Thread William Bagwell
On Saturday 21 March 2015, Larry Kuenning wrote:
 Settable by which user?  The sender or the recipient?

Recipient of course, sender has no way of knowing what the recipient prefers.

 And wouldn't a default of removing all but one level of quoted text make
 nonsense of some posts?  E.g. in the passage above, one needs the inner
 quotation to know what the outer quotation refers to.

Not for us. Someone joining the conversation mid stream might but that is 
what archives are for.

 It seems to me correct editing of quotation sequences requires human
 thought, not just mechanical text manipulation.  Even though some people
 expect their computers to think for them.

I'm sure there would be occasionally maglings when some one starts a sentence 
with with an alternate quote character. Lindsay Haisley raises the valid 
point that HTML mail would be most difficult to include in such a filter.

Oh well, I can dream...
-- 
William
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] The right way to reply to a mailing list

2015-03-21 Thread William Bagwell
On Saturday 21 March 2015, Al Black wrote:
 Although the ideal solution is obviously users changing their behaviour
 and or MUAs, I've wondered whether an auto-trim function within mailman
 would make sense (for digest users...)  

Yes! For every one, not just digest users. And it should default to removing 
all but one single level of quoted text (regardless of top or bottom 
posting) and be *user* setable to none removed or all quoted text removed. 

Should also remove all quoted list banners and this should not be an easily 
changeable setting. Make them edit the source if they want to see seven list 
banners;-)

BTW, in my older version of KMail left clicking and *releasing* the 'Reply' 
button uses the default 'Reply' option. Left clicking and *holding* opens a 
dialog box with the following four options,
Reply
Reply to Author 
Reply to All
Reply to Mailing-List
-- 
William
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Internet Message Format: Identification Fields

2014-06-23 Thread William Bagwell
On Monday 23 June 2014, Mark Sapiro wrote:
 Your choice is clear to me. If you don't like the way Gmail handles your
 list posts, subscribe and post from a non-gmail address.

Mark, off topic for *this* list though you might want to add this to the FAQ?

willi, some web hosting servers will allow customers to post outgoing mail 
with any address you own. Even if it does not match the domain you have 
hosted with them. My ISP (.tds) address has been outsourced to Gmail for 
about five years. When this message returns to me Gmail will not discared it 
as a duplicate since they did not see it out bound. 

Only good solution I have found though it does cost $5 per month for hosting. 
Which I would have anyway just for my web site...
-- 
William
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Can Mailman be installed on a free python webhost?

2013-12-02 Thread William Bagwell
On Monday 02 December 2013, R. Sheng-Chieh Cheng wrote:
 With all the hack and permission's problem, I decided not to try to
 install Mailman anywhere. I am not a geek and know no python, so I am not
 going to start.

Not free, but if you can afford $35 per year. Do not mind Mailman via cPanel 
(there are slight differences...) and can live with a strict 1,000 email per 
hour limit. For example, a discusion list with 100 members (assuming none 
are on digest) will hit the limit at 10 posts in one hour. Then check out 
the 'Tiny' package at A Small Orange http://asmallorange.com/hosting/

Very limited space for archives but should suffice for a text only list. They 
have larger plans with more space / bandwidth for more money but those also 
have the same 1,000 emails per hour limit.
-- 
William
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] receive your own posts problem

2013-04-11 Thread William Bagwell
On Thursday 11 April 2013, Joseph Brennan wrote:
 The solution, or workaround I would say, is to change the Message-ID.
 Possibly, a milter could do this on the way in on the Mailman host. Maybe
 add a fixed string to what's already there.

 However this might have some impact on non Gmail users that does not come
 to mind immediately, so I am NOT saying to do this.

As long as it defaults off and is user selectable I think this would be a 
nice feature. Suggested similar in the past... It will break threading for 
those of us who want full Usenet style indented threading. Doubt that those 
who read mail in a web browser or read and delete will notice.
-- 
William
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] receive your own posts problem

2013-04-11 Thread William Bagwell
On Thursday 11 April 2013, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
 No, by definition it's a nasty feature, as it involves nonconformance
 to RFC 5322.

How so? I see two places in section 3.6.4. that suggest otherwise.
 A message
   identifier pertains to exactly one version of a particular message;
   subsequent revisions to the message each receive new message
   identifiers.

So if a list adds a footer to the body of a message (many do) then that 
implies that the Message-ID /should/ be changed. Obviously Mailman does not 
want to break threading for no good reason. However fighting Gmail's 
annoying feature with a less annoying kludge is a good enough reason in my 
book.

Just below, same section 3.6.4., top of page 25, In all
  cases, it is the meaning that the sender of the message wishes to
  convey (i.e., whether this is the same message or a different
  message) that determines whether or not the Message-ID: field
  changes, not any particular syntactic difference that appears (or
  does not appear) in the message.

If the sender ticks the box telling Mailman to change the Message-ID then 
they get to take the heat. Other settings have brief descriptions / warnings 
so a sentence warning about breaking threading and the other issues you 
raise would not be out of place.
-- 
William
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman hosting needed

2013-01-27 Thread William Bagwell
On Sunday 27 January 2013, Ed Kasky wrote:
 I just did exactly what you are doing for the same reasons...

 I moved everything over to Asmallorange and so far I have been very happy.

Long time ASO customer... They have a strict 1,000 emails per hour limit so a 
discussion list with 250 members would exceed this with as few as five posts 
in one hour. (Assuming no digest members.) AFAICT all size plans have the 
same limit. However, it *is* possible to split a single list between two 
separate plans. 

But yes, if you are not a spamer, can stay within the 1,000 per hour limit, 
and are not offended by Mailman via cPanel, ASO is hard to beat on price.
-- 
William
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Gmail features

2012-08-09 Thread William Bagwell
On Thursday 09 August 2012, Lucio Crusca wrote:
 I'd only like to slap gmail in the face if I could, by
 working around their wonderful feature, just for the taste of feeling
 smarter than they pretend to be. All in all, what is hacking about if
 not that?

Please do! Gmail user only because my ISP outsourced mail to them three 
years ago. Was helping a small discusion list move from an LSoft 
ListServe to Mailman at the time so suddenly missing my own posts back 
made testing impossible.

Was infuriated when I discovered there was no way to turn this stupid 
feature off. My work around is to post through my web hosts mail server. 
Most people do not have this option so a setting in Mailman for other 
would be great.
-- 
William
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman and Gmane ?

2010-01-21 Thread William Bagwell
On Thursday 21 January 2010, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
 The only control you have is to use Mailman filters on incoming posts.
 Until somebody tells us what headers Gmane provides to identify
 itself, we can only guess at what might work.

X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/

Seems to be the most consistently used. I found examples in my personal 
archives of a gated list going back as far as 2003. Googling the header 
gets hits as recent as last month so it is still in use.

They also add an, X-Complaints-To: header in the form of 
X-Complaints-To: usenet@'something'.gmane.org
Where 'something' can be main, sea, or ger. 

Also various path headers and usually a message ID. None of these seem 
consistant enough to use for filtering.
-- 
William


--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman and Gmane ?

2010-01-21 Thread William Bagwell
On Wednesday 20 January 2010, William Bagwell wrote:
 On Wednesday 20 January 2010, Mark Sapiro wrote:
  John Fitzsimons wrote:
  Private archive file not found
 
  It translates to
 
  http://mydomain/mailman/private/mymailinglist/mymailinglist.mbox/myma
 il inglist.mbox
 
  where mydomain is your host name and mymailinglist is the cPanel list
  name of the form listname_mydomain. Note that mymailinglist.mbox
  appears twice, as a directory and a file.

 Mark, I can confirm what John is getting and am willing to post the
 real URL to the list and send the *user* password directly to you if
 necessary. (Its just a test list with two archived posts, both by
 myself)

Moving this back to the list.

A bit of odd behavior here with both Konqueror and Firefox. First, I know 
the example link to the tiny test list I sent you off list was slightly 
broken. (missing the first .mbox) And the fixed version you sent back 
worked perfectly. However, I noticed it had by passed the authentication 
screen due to my user name  password being saved in cookies.

Tried your 'corrected' link in a diffrent browser, got the authentication 
page, logged in with user name and password and promptly got the Private 
archive file not found error again. Looked at the URL and it was now 
missing the first .mbox. Opened a new tab, pasted in the full correct URL 
and it pulled down a complete archive. 

So, even when you know the exact location of the archives, something still 
tries to hide them. Now I just need to get brave and try editing them and 
see what breaks:)

Want to thank John for asking and you for answering! While Gmane and 
gateways are interesting, they are way down on my list of priorities. 
Knowing the true location of archives is useful right now.
-- 
William


--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman and Gmane ?

2010-01-20 Thread William Bagwell
On Wednesday 20 January 2010, Mark Sapiro wrote:
 John Fitzsimons wrote:

 Private archive file not found

 It translates to

 http://mydomain/mailman/private/mymailinglist/mymailinglist.mbox/mymail
inglist.mbox

 where mydomain is your host name and mymailinglist is the cPanel list
 name of the form listname_mydomain. Note that mymailinglist.mbox
 appears twice, as a directory and a file.

Mark, I can confirm what John is getting and am willing to post the real 
URL to the list and send the *user* password directly to you if 
necessary. (Its just a test list with two archived posts, both by myself)

Oh 2.1.11.cp3 here.
-- 
William
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Removing archives query.

2010-01-10 Thread William Bagwell
On Sunday 10 January 2010, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
 snip

 I should explain why I believe *this* feature doesn't really benefit
 Mailman itself.  It requires destroying data, on behalf of people who
 almost by definition don't know exactly what they're doing.  In some
 cases, doing this properly would require ensuring a fresh backup
 before removing that data, and that is something that the host
 administrator must do, and he should provide advice to the (naive)
 user before it is done.

Respectively disagree. Even end users of a mailing list can download 
Gzip'd copies of the archives. The list owner can turn archiving off and 
the domain administrator (cPanel end user) can *delete* the entire list 
if they desire. What none of these people can do is simply edit the 
archives. Spam, blocks of older posts when the plan runs out of space,  
even Aunt Bee's secret pickle recipe all must await support at the 
hosting company to remove.

Personally know more list owners I would trust with this task than level 1 
support personal. 

Also believe this feature would be usefull for list owners of any flavor 
of Mailman. Guessing (hoping) cPanel would jump at the chance to pass it 
to their customers. Reducing support requests is also a good thing:)

 snip
 Now the legal obligation of cPanel is nil, and the ethical obligation
 is in some sense moot (we knew about this when we chose to contribute
 to a GPLed project).  But since *we* *are* going try to help cPanel
 users who show up here, it would be really nice to have access to a
 reasonably fresh copy of those sources.  They *must* come from a
 cPanel customer; the GPL does not permit us to just go out and grab
 them.

 That is something he may be able to do for us, if he wants to.

If John F. has no luck with his hosting provider I will try mine.
-- 
William
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] List is too moderated. :-(

2010-01-07 Thread William Bagwell
On Thursday 07 January 2010, John Fitzsimons wrote:
 Okay, I think I have messed up somewhere. Using version 2.1.11.cp3
 I have setup new member applications to require approval. To avoid
 just anyone joining the list.

 That works fine. I get an email to allow/disallow them as subscribers.
 The problem however is that even though they become members
 I need to approve' each new email.

 How/where in the web interface do I set things up to block anyone
 subscribing themselves without my approval BUT once becoming
 a member to post without needing any further authorisation from me
 as administrator.

With 2.1.12.cp3 it is Membership Management, Membership List,
Set everyone's moderation bit... Set to Off

And as Adam previously posted, Privacy options, What steps are required 
for subscription? Set to Require approval
-- 
William
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org