Re: MI Map Projection

2000-09-26 Thread Clifford J Mugnier


I do not understand what you are asking for.  Please explain more.  What is
your name?  Are you asking for the parameters of the Johore Grid or what?
Malaya went to the Rectified Skew Orthomorphic system many decades ago.
Are you sure you need the Cassini-Soldner stuff?  Are you on the Revised
Kertau Datum or the Old Indian 1916?

Hmm?

Cliff

Prof. Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Surveying, Geodesy,  Photogrammetry
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY
12408 CEBA Building
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Voice  Facsimilie: (225) 388-8536
==
SEE: http://www.ASPRS.org/resources.html
==
If Anybody out there knows what are the projection  do Malaysian used to
customised their Cassini-Soldner Projection
All I know Cassini-Soldner is an Equirectangular  projection and there's no
info about this projection in Mapinfo projection help  section.

-sopax-
Gis Data Integrator
World COM.com




--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: MI Geoid model Greenland

2000-09-20 Thread Clifford J Mugnier


EGM96 covers the entire world, what about that?  It used to be available at
the National Geodetic Survey web site as well as at the NIMA web site.

Plus, it's free.

Prof. Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Surveying, Geodesy,  Photogrammetry
Dept. of Civil  Environmental Engineering
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY
12408 CEBA Building
Baton Rouge, Louisiana  70803
Voice:  (225) 388-8536
Facsimilie (225) 388-8652
==
SEE:  http://www.asprs.org/resources.html
==



Hi,

Who can help me?
I need a Geoid model of Greenland.

Thanks,

Peter


--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MI Republic of Taiwan - GRIDS DATUMS

2000-06-17 Thread Clifford J. Mugnier

Kim Ollivier
Ollivier  Company
New Zealand

Dear Kim,

In regard to your direct message to me of last week and 
later posting to
the GIS-L on 12 Jun, the early records of survey work in 
Formosa date
back to a Japanese Hydrographic Department survey of the 
west coast
in 1897.  Between 1900 and 1904 the Government General of 
Formosa
under the supervision of the Japanese Government 
established
approximately 2,000 stations.  Japanese Imperial Land 
Survey initiated
their work on a first-order net in Formosa in 1909.  The 
system for this
 and succeeding lower-order triangulation is the Koshizan 
1906 Datum
where the origin is at station Koshizan where Latitude =
23* 58' 32.3400 North, and Longitude = 120* 58' 25.9750" 
East of
Greenwich,and the initial azimuth is to south end of 
Horisha base
where az = 243* 47' 21.611".  Of course, the ellipsoid of 
reference is
the Bessel 1841; the same as the Tokyo Datums of the 19th 
and 20th
centuries.

The Grid system is/was known as the Formosa Grid (since 
merely
renamed the Taiwan Grid), and is the Gauss-Schreiber 
Transverse
Mercator.  Note that this is the double projection that 
first is
transformed to the equivalent sphere before ellipsoidal 
correction
terms are added so the projection is not perfectly 
conformal as is
the Gauss-Kruger used for UTM.  The Formosa/Taiwan TM 
Latitude
of Origin is = 23* 40' 00.000" North, Central Meridian is 
Longitude =
120* 58' 25.9750" East of Greenwich.  (No False Easting or 
False
Northing were used, per the Japanese way of doing things).
Note that the Japanese STILL do not use False Easting or 
False
Northing for their Civil Grid of Japan in a kazillion 
different zones!!
They really do use negative numbers for both X and for Y 
coordinates
when they fall in the appropriate quadrants.  They may have 
assigned
False Eastings for their own convenience for civilian 
applications in
Taiwan since WWII.  If your value of 450 km is the range of 
eastings
for your maps in-hand, it's likely at the Central Meridian 
listed above.

The military of the Republic of Taiwan uses the Hu-Tzu-Shan 
Datum
of 1950 and it is referenced to the International 
ellipsoid.  For military
applications, they use the UTM.  Considering who is 
snarling at them
on a regular basis, I do not expect to get much more info 
on geodetic
reference systems for Taiwan in the near future.  If you 
scrounge
anything, I'd appreciate a copy.  Don't get hanged for 
espionage!

Sorry it took me a while to look this up for you; I was at 
a Pistol Match
with my youngest son (18yrs) and my youngest daughter 
(12yrs).  Only
family or pistols take precedence over Grids and Datums. 
 In this case
it was both!

Consider joining the American Society for Photogrammetry 
and Remote
Sensing.

I strongly recommend it.

Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Surveying, Geodesy, and Photogrammetry
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY
12408 CEBA Building
Baton Rouge, Louisiana  70803
Voice and Facsimilie: (225) 388 - 8536

--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MI RE: The Puzzle of Austria

2000-02-27 Thread Clifford J. Mugnier

Brian,

Simple answer:  The U.S. Army Map Service adjusted Austria 
to the European Datum 1950 (International ellipsoid) in 
1951.  There's an enormous amount of history on Austrian 
Geodesy and Mapping, but I think that answers your question 
succintly.  AMS did the entire computation on the UTM Grid. 
 See  my column on Belgium in "Photogrammetric Engineering 
and Remote Sensing."  Past columns of mine can be 
downloaded from:

http://www.asprs.org/resources.html

Look under "Grids and Datums."  (I think Belgium is 
available there).

Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The Topographic Engineering Laboratory
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS
New Orleans, Louisiana  70148

Voice and Facsimilie: (504) 280-7095

On Saturday, 26 February, 2000 11:10 PM, Brian wrote:
 Cliff

 I sincerely apologize for the intrusion, but I figure 
that
 if anyone knows the answer, it is you.

 Austria joined the UTM standard in 1997 after joining 
NATO
 yet a 1951 map of Kufstein/Tyrol Austria, made in 1951
 and presented to a professor of mine by the Geography
 Department at the University of Salzberg was created
 using the UTM standard for the time.

 Any ideas other than the U.S. military had implemented 
UTM
 at the time and were probably influencing the region as a
 result of their occupation of Germany.

 Thanks for any assistance.

 Brian


--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MI lambert conical orthomorphic

2000-02-26 Thread Clifford J. Mugnier

There is no single British Grid that covers all of India. 
 For Large-Scale mapping, there are seven (7) individual 
Lambert Zones.  (That is a necessity for geodetic surveying 
applications.)  You must be working with a small-scale 
thematic base.

I do not work with that sort of thing; I'm afraid that 
thematic mapping is not in my purview.  The distortions 
that would be introduced as a result of a wrong guess on 
standard parallels would be insignificant for all practical 
purposes.  If you are looking at a single map of all of 
India, I doubt that even the "proper" ellipsoid choice 
would have any effect at all.

Sorry.

Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The Topographic Engineering Laboratory
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS
New Orleans, Louisiana  70148

Voice and Facsimilie: (504) 280-7095

On Thursday, 24 February, 2000 10:32 PM, Dr Rajeev saraf 
wrote:
 Thanks for the reply. the limits are:
 lat 72 to 96 degrees and
 long: 8 to 36 degrees

 covers whole of india.
 thanks again.

 --
 rajeev saraf
 -Original Message-----
 From: Clifford J. Mugnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'Dr Rajeev saraf' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mapinfo-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thursday, February 24, 2000 7:14 PM
 Subject: RE: MI lambert conical orthomorphic


 Lambert Conical Orthomorphic is the British term for
 Lambert Conformal Conic.  The Brits introduced it in the
 Survey of India in the early 1900's.  Captain Martin
 Hotine
 was the Geodesist that did it - he was one of the
 "Giants
 of Geodesy." There are numberous secant zones (2
 standard
 parallels).  India is a BIG place.  Exactly what are the
 limits of Latitude and Longitude of the map you have in
 hand?
 
 Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 The Topographic Engineering Laboratory
 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
 UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS
 New Orleans, Louisiana  70148
 
 Voice and Facsimilie: (504) 280-7095
 
 On Thursday, 24 February, 2000 12:33 AM, Dr Rajeev saraf
 [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
  HellO evrybodY:
  i have a map of india which says that the projection
  is
  "lambert conical orthomorphic". can somebody suggest
  the
  projection in MI list that matches with this
  projection
  or the parameters required to create new projection
  --
  thanks
 
  Rajeev saraf
  lepton software
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
File: ATT00013.htm 
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MI Bulgarian Projections

2000-02-23 Thread Clifford J. Mugnier

Brendan,

The four old datums are New Bulgarian 1928, Observatorio 
Astronomico Militari Bucharasti, New Romanian 1930, and 
Kustendil.  I would guess the most recent is the "System 
42" based on the Krassovski ellipsoid.

I have an Astro position, "Chernyy Verkh" at

Lat = 43* 33' 54.55"N
Lon = 23* 16' 51.96"E

which is the origin point of the New Bulgarian Datum of 
1928, and is referenced to the International ellipsoid.  If 
they followed the lead of the Romanians and the Poles, this 
is the origin of the new 1970 system in Bulgaria.

The Romanian Planuri Directuri (sp?) Lambert Conformal 
Conic is on the Observatorio Datum and is referenced to the 
Clarke 1880 Romanian modified ellipsoid.

The "Kronstadt Oblique Stereographic of 1934" is on the New 
Romanian Datum of 1930, and the math model of the 
projection is the Rousilhe Stereographic favored by the 
French Navy.  (Internaitonal ellipsoid again.)  In 1970, 
the Romanians picked up the Hristow math model in "Stereo 
70."

The rest is like I said, G-K TM.  No polyconics.

In 1970, the Poles and the Romanians BOTH picked up the 
Hristow Oblique Stereographic.  If the Bulgarians did 
something strange, my guess would be the Hristow, not the 
Polyconic.  It looks like a conic projection on a 
large-scale topo map and is frequently mistaken for Lambert 
or Polyconic.  Stereographic is the standard projection and 
Grid for circularly shaped countries all over the world.  I 
would think that the Warsaw Pact dudes read the same books 
as me ...

Oh, and by the way,  Prof. Hristow was Bulgarian.  He wrote 
in German, he published in Austrian geodetic stuff, but he 
taught in Sofia.

I don't think they EVER used Hassler's Polyconic.  Maybe 
Lallemond's Polyconic for IMW stuff before WWII.

Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The Topographic Engineering Laboratory
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS
New Orleans, Louisiana  70148

Voice and Facsimilie: (504) 280-7095
  
-
On Wednesday, 23 February, 2000 2:26 AM, Brendan wrote:
 Cliff,

 Many thanks for the response,

 I will endeavour to get more data from my contacts.  All 
I
 know about the
 1970 system came in an email, this is the relevant bit

 "The official projection used in Bulgaria is called 
SYSTEM
 1970 and is some
 kind of polyconic projection with secret parameters.
 Although we have been
 trying to get a clue on what these might be for 
something
 like 3 years we
 couldn't get any information on that from the Military
 Topographic Service
 and other institutions. However, there is a large number
 of (in theory)
 secret black box programmes that would convert your data
 in either LL or
 some other global projection."

 I do not have any of these "black boxes" but will try to
 get some.

 Probably very naively, I read your your Uzbekistan paper
 and assuming USSR/
 Warsaw pact monolith worked out the two UTM type
 projections with the
 Krassovsky and the central scale factor of 1 which might
 be applicable to
 Bulgaria.

 I will look again in PERS for the Four datums in 
Bulgaria
 to which you
 allude (or should I look elsewhere ?).

 I would certainly like to contact you again if and when I
 can get any more
 concrete information

 Thanks again Brendan


--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MI RE: Datums and Projections

2000-02-22 Thread Clifford J. Mugnier

Brendan,

I have zero on the use of the Polyconic in Bulgaria unless 
you are diddling with 1:1,000,000 International Map of the 
World (IMW) stuff.  If that is so, then what you have is 
the standard IMW Lallemond Polyconic.

The Russian Verst Maps (1891) were on the Polyhedric 
Projection at 1:126,000 scale, but other than being in the 
same screwy projection "family" of aphylactics, there is no 
similarity to the Polyconic.  For info on the Polyhedrics 
(Polyeder in Dutch and German), see my past columns in 
PERS.  I do not know if MapInfo supports that projection.

Otherwise, everything I can find in Bulgaria is 
Gauss-Kruger Transverse Mercator.
Four Datums, but all on G-K TM.

I have never heard of the Bulgarian 1970 System.  Send me 
some info and maybe I can help you.

Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Geodesy, Photogrammetry,  Surveying
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY
Baton Rouge, Louisiana  70803

Voice: (225) 388-8536
-
Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The Topographic Engineering Laboratory
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS
New Orleans, Louisiana  70148

Voice and Facsimilie: (504) 280-7095

  
---
On Monday, 21 February, 2000 11:44 AM, Brendan wrote:

 Dear Mr Mugnier,

 I read your mails in the MI user group regarding MI 
Datums
 and have visited
 asprs.org and the intimidating (by virtue of volume)
 NIMA.mil.

 I am mailing you from Ireland so I trust concerns about
 secrecy are
 academic, however if you wish I will send you my PGP
 public key.

 I am interested in the Bulgarian System 1970 projection
 which I believe is
 polyconic and secret, data on the older 1950 system and
 the 1:25000 scale
 map series would also be welcome.

 Any general or specific advice would be most welcome.

 regards Brendan

--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MI Iranian Datums

2000-02-20 Thread Clifford J. Mugnier

Nahrwan, System 42, Indian 1916, and Busheir

Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The Topographic Engineering Laboratory
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS
New Orleans, Louisiana  70148

Voice and Facsimilie: (504) 280-7095

On Friday, 18 February, 2000 6:28 PM, Tim Warman 
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
   File: ATT4.txt; charset = Windows-1252  
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MI Datums

2000-02-17 Thread Clifford J. Mugnier

Old columns of mine (including Uzbekistan) can be 
downloaded (for free) from the "Grids and Datums" section 
at:

 http://www.asprs.org.resources.html

Be careful what you say in public (over the internet) about 
System 42.  It is still a State Secret in your country, and 
the authorities are strict about that topic.

Another site that could help you is the U.S. military 
mapping organization (it is unclassified, and available to 
anyone over the internet).

 http://www.NIMA.mil

Lots of stuff can be downloaded for free (from that site) 
in regard to WGS84 Datum relations with other "Local" 
Datums like System 42.

Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The Topographic Engineering Laboratory
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS
New Orleans, Louisiana  70148

Voice and Facsimilie: (504) 280-7095

  
-
On Thursday, 17 February, 2000 3:52 AM, 52 [SMTP:52@mail  
.ru] wrote:
 Hello List,

 Can any body explain to me what is datum, and where can i
 change it in
 MapInfo. As i undestand datum transformatin needed only
 when i want to
 jump from one ellipsoid to another. Is it right?

 I've found some information about datum i need (Pulkovo
 1942) in
 LocalCoordSysDefs.fme file (Bursa transformation as i
 understood), but shifts there are slightly different
 from these that i got from another source, i know that
 datums are
 being changing with time, but where can i get recent
 information.

 I have following problem. I get some data that was made
 with some
 datum (is there any need to include one when creating a
 layer), so
 after importing it into Mapinfo i have certain coords
 shift. What can i do?
 Is there any understandable source of imformation about
 datums?

 --
 Best regards,
  Sim D.
  Biodiversity Conservation Center, Moscow
  GIS Dept. ++7(095)-124-7934
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 
--
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
 "unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MI RE: dem of Indian subcontinent

2000-02-11 Thread Clifford J. Mugnier

Dear Junior Geologist,

DEM data of India is a military secret in India.  The only 
known source of 1:50,000 scale topographic data (not from 
the Survey of India) are the old USSR's military topo map 
series of India.  It's expensive, but you can get it out of 
the Netherlands.  Be careful though, since you are inside 
of India's borders, it is a crime against the National 
Secrecy Act to possess that data in India.  You can go to 
jail if you are caught with the stuff, or if it's 
discovered on your computer/workstation.

This topic is one that has caused (and still causes) a 
great deal of heartburn within the GIS Community in India. 
 That is an internal concern to the citizens of India, and 
a problem that can only be addressed through your own 
internal Parlimentary process of your National Government.

In the meantime, be careful what you ask for.  You might 
get it.

Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The Topographic Engineering Laboratory
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS
New Orleans, Louisiana  70148

Voice and Facsimilie: (504) 280-7095

On Thursday, 10 February, 2000 11:55 PM, asit saha 
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
 Dear friends,

 Can anybody supply me with the DEM of Indian
 subcontinent? Is there any site on the web where I can
 find it? I need to plot some seismic data using the
 DEM as background.
 PLease help

 asit

 =


 asit saha
 geologist ( junior)
 GEODATA  DATABASE DIVISION
 CHQ, GSI, 27, J. N. ROAD
 CALCUTTA - 700016
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
 http://im.yahoo.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MI Australian GDA94

2000-01-31 Thread Clifford J. Mugnier

Adrian,

Other than asking for a ".prj" file, I would think that the 
MapInfo List is not the place to go for advice on your 
topic of interest.  Since the Australian Land Information 
Group (http://www.AUSLIG.gov.au) is the sole authority on 
the topic, I'd recommend that you go there for the last 
word on the GDA94.

Chances are, someone at AUSLIG speaks MapInfo, too.

Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The Topographic Engineering Laboratory
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS
New Orleans, Louisiana  70148

Voice and Facsimilie: (504) 280-7095
  
--
On Monday, 31 January, 2000 4:41 PM, Adrian Davey 
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
 Hi listers

 Does anyone have an updated mapinfo.prj file (compatible
 with v4.5)
 which includes provision for the new Australian 
geocentric
 datum GDA94?

 Or, for practical [i.e. MI] purposes, can it be assumed
 that GDA94 is so
 close to WGS84 that if it were any closer it would be
 exact?
 
__
 ___
 ADRIAN DAVEY mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Phone: 61 2 6201 2517, Fax: 61 2 6201 5305
 Applied Ecology Research Group
  http://aerg.canberra.edu.au/pub/aerg/home.htm
 School of Resource, Environmental  Heritage Sciences
  http://science.canberra.edu.au/rehs
 UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA, ACT, 2601, AUSTRALIA


 
--
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
 "unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MI Maps of Niue

2000-01-18 Thread Clifford J. Mugnier

Paula,

One of my Ph.D. students did the complete readjustment of 
the Tomb Point Datum for Niue last semester.  It was a 
series of interlocking classical traverse loops with 
several co-located geodetic-quality GPS stations.  The 
project is 100% complete, and I have the standard topo map 
of Niue in which the "atlas grid" is actually the local 
survey grid with 1Km grid blocks lettered for the tourists. 
 The entire project was adjusted with a rigorous least 
squares network adjustment with the latest debugged version 
of "ADJUST" by the U.S. National Geodetic Survey.

I can't release the stuff to you yet because I have not had 
time to send the Government of Niue a copy of the final 
report.  Maybe I can do it this week ... when they approve 
it then maybe I can ...

HOWEVER,

Whatever happened to the copies of McCaw's books on Viti 
Levu, Vanua Levu, and Taveuni, as well as a copy of Mike 
Poidevin's report that Litea Biukoto (of SOPAC) promised 
she was going to send to me last September?  (That's 
September 20, 1999).

I'll let you see mine after you let me see yours ...

Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The Topographic Engineering Laboratory
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS
New Orleans, Louisiana  70148

Voice and Facsimilie: (504) 280-7095
  
---
On Tuesday, 18 January, 2000 4:24 PM, Paula Dawe 
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
 Listers,

 Does anyone out there have any digital maps, air photos,
 or satellite images
 of the Pacific Island country of Niue, or know from where
 they might be
 obtained?  Any information would be helpful, as resources
 out this way tend
 to be slim.  This is for a water utility GIS.  Thanks.

 Cheers,
 Paula Dawe
 Water Resource Engineer-SOPAC
 
--
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
 "unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MI what is Bonne projection?

2000-01-14 Thread Clifford J. Mugnier

Rajeev,

I noticed the other answers you have received on the list 
so far, and they are correct to a point.  Within the 
apparent context of your question about a projection found 
in an atlas, you have your answer.

However, in 19th century Europe and early to middle 20th 
century Middle East (and most French colonies), the Bonne 
Projection means something quite different.  When working 
with Geodetic Grid systems it is an ellipsoidal 
implementation that is NOT the same as using the spherical 
equations.  Geographers will occasionally use ellipsoidal 
Authalic latitude in thematic applications with the 
spherical equations.  (See the late Prof. Karl Rinner in 
"Zeitschritt der Vermessungswessen," back in 1932 - I 
forgot which issue.)

The February, 2000 issue of "Photogrammetric Engineering 
and Remote Sensing" will feature my column on Grids and 
Datums for the Republic of Madagascar.  In that, I discuss 
the Bonne projection as used in Madagascar and why General 
Jean Laborde hated it for geodetic work.  You can find 
other countries in past issues of my column at:

http://www.asprs.org/resources.html

If MI supports it, I would expect it to be the thematic 
spherical implementation and NOT the special ellipsoidal 
power series once used for geodetic National Grid systems.

Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The Topographic Engineering Laboratory
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS
New Orleans, Louisiana  70148

Voice and Facsimilie: (504) 280-7095

Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The Topographic Engineering Laboratory
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS
New Orleans, Louisiana  70148

Voice and Facsimilie: (504) 280-7095
  
-
On Sunday, 16 January, 2000 10:29 AM, Dr Rajeev saraf 
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
 Hi:
 has any body heard of bonne projection. i came across it
 in  an atlas. does mi support it. if so, which option in
 projection file would do it.
 --
 rajeev saraf
   File: ATT00032.html  
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MI Germaine Ellipsoid

1999-12-25 Thread Clifford J. Mugnier

Merry Christmas everybody!

I'm at home today and don't want to go to the campus. 
 Could someone please look up the date of the Germaine 
ellipsoid where a = 6,378,284 and 1/f = 294 ???

(It was used in Madagascar in the 1800's.)

Thanks,

Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The Topographic Engineering Laboratory
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS
New Orleans, Louisiana  70148

Voice and Facsimilie: (504) 280-7095


--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MI Brazil Projection Details

1999-12-23 Thread Clifford J. Mugnier

Scott,

This is out of my "scale" of expertise, but by any chance 
could this sheet be cut on the IMW (International Map of 
the World) format?  If it is, it's not a Lambert but a 
Lallemond Polyconic - infinite number of standard 
parallels.

The math is in Snyder's USGS Bible.

Merry Christmas!

Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The Topographic Engineering Laboratory
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS
New Orleans, Louisiana  70148

Voice and Facsimilie: (504) 280-7095

On Thursday, 23 December, 1999 3:11 AM, Scott Davies 
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
 Listers

 Can somebody please help.
 I need to know the projection parameters for the 
1:500,000
 geological mapsheet series over Brazil.  I believe it is
 the Lambert Conformal Conic Projection, but unsure of the
 standard parallels to use.
 Any help would be appreciated

 Many Thanks and Happy Christmas

 Scott Davies

 Meridian GIS
 PO Box 295
 Level 2, 1050 Hay Street
 West Perth 6872
 Western Australia
 Phone : (618) 9226-0101
 Fax : (618) 9226-0102
 email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.meridian-gis.com/



 
--
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
 "unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MI Aerial Photography - Printing and Storage

1999-07-15 Thread Clifford J. Mugnier

Steven,

Who is doing the photogrammetry?  Is your photogrammetrist 
doing "softcopy" aerotriangulation or are they using 
analytical plotters?  Do you intend to use only rectified 
imagery or are you going for orthophotos?  What type of 
terrain are you working in?  Is this urban, rural, dessert, 
forest, what?  What do you need to resolve?  Are you having 
your imagery scanned by a professional mapping company that 
uses a calibrated photogrammetric scanner?  What calibrated 
focal length are you using from what altitude?  What is the 
AWAR - Area Weighted Average Resolution of the mapping 
camera?  Did it have IMC - Image Motion Compensation?  Was 
it turned on for the flight?  What is the level of image 
smear?  Who wrote the specifications for the photography? 
 Is this color, color infrared, or panchromatic?

Is this a professional mapping project, or is some 
secretary/typist going to stick paper prints into an 
office-grade HP scanjet?

Just a detail or two would help ...

Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The Topographic Engineering Laboratory
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS
New Orleans, Louisiana  70148

Voice and Facsimilie: (504) 280-7095

On Wednesday, 14 July, 1999 9:15 PM, Steven Heapy 
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
 Our Council has just had some aerial photography flown at
 1:5000 and are
 investigating at what DPI we should have this scanned at
 ie 600 or 1200
 DPI

 We are currently testing both, obviously the 1200 
requires
 more storage
 and cost but gives an improved image on the screen and
 prints better.
 However both images that are printed through MapInfo 5.5
 in the layout
 seem to loose a fair amount of quality compared to being
 printed in say
 Photo Editor.

 Also has anyone used and printed images compressed with 
Mr
 Sid over a NT
 network.

 All comments, sugestions and ideas regarding DPI
 (resolution), storage
 and printing would be appreciate

 Regards
 Steve
 
--

--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]