Re: [mapserver-users] Specify resolution (or pixel size) in WMS requests

2012-07-20 Thread Astrid Emde
Hi Thomas,

I opened up the ticket for Thekla on github

https://github.com/mapserver/mapserver/issues/4401

Thanks for your help

Astrid

Am 18.07.2012 20:49, schrieb thomas bonfort:
> Thekla,
> can you open a ticket for this one please ? I'll try to have a look at
> it before the 6.2 release, but can't promise anything...
>
> thanks,
> thomas
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Thekla Wirkus
>  wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> last december 2011 Astrid wrote a mail about the behaviour of RESOLUTION and
>> DEFRESOLUTION. We tested again with MapServer
>> 6.2 and here are the results. The size of the symbols, texts and lines was
>> not like we expected. They were often too small.
>>
>> Have a look at the mail from 14. december 2011
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/2011-December/071077.html
>>
>>
>> We tested with MAP.RESOLUTION=288&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=72, SIZEUNINTS Meters,
>> the scaled layers with SYMBOLSCALEDENOM 1.
>> http://localhost/cgi-bin/mapserv62b1?map=/data/umn/resolution/map/resolution_test.map&MAP.RESOLUTION=288&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=72"&VERSION=1.1.1&REQUEST=GetMap&SERVICE=WMS&LAYERS=notscaledPoint,scaledPoint,notscaledLine,scaledLine,notscaledPolygon,scaledPolygon,Polygon_with_symbols,notscaledLabel,scaledLabel&STYLES=&SRS=EPSG:31466&BBOX=2517600,5672315,2518960,5673675&WIDTH=2000&HEIGHT=2000&FORMAT=image/png&BGCOLOR=0xff&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&EXCEPTIONS=application/vnd.ogc.se_xml
>>
>>
>> The behaviour of MapServer 6.0 and MapServer 6.2 is just the same. This time
>> we have a demo project where we tried the different cases. You can download
>> it at:
>>
>> UMN:
>>
>> https://svn.wheregroup.com/download/mapserver_resolution.zip
>>
>> PDF:
>> https://svn.wheregroup.com/download/mapserver_resolution_pdf.zip
>>
>>
>>
>> Results:
>>
>> POINTS
>> * scaled or not scaled Points/Symbols: displayed correct, scaled and
>> notscaled are the same in the map
>>
>> LINES
>> * scaled lines: displayed correct
>> * unscaled lines: too small (1:2000, 1:5000, 1:1000), correct (1:2)
>>
>> POLYGON
>> * scaled Polygone/Outline: displayed correct
>> * not scaled Polygone/Outline: too small (1:2000), correct (1:5000,
>> 1:1,1:2)
>> * scaled or not scaled Polygone with symbols: displayed correct
>>
>> LABEL
>> * scaled Label: too small
>> * not scaled Label: too big (1:1000, 1:2000, 1:5000, too small (1:2)
>>
>>
>> For us it would be good to get this problem solved, as at the moment we
>> generate a copy of the mapfile for the print with symbol- and labelsize
>> multiplyed with factor 4. It would be charming to solve the print with one
>> mapfile. We could do testing and maybe I could look for sponsoring too.
>>
>>
>>
>> Is there someone else interested to solve this? Is there a ticket already?
>>
>> Thekla
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 14.12.2011 17:44, Astrid Emde wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> we tried the parameter MAP.RESOLUTION AND MAP.DEFRESOLUTION with
>> MapServer 6.0.1 and made the following observations.
>>
>> We tested with RESOLUTION=288&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=72
>>
>> The size of the symbols and textes was not like we expected. They were
>> often too small.
>>
>> We tested with and without the parameter SYMBOLSCALEDENOM
>>
>> 1.) without SYMBOLSCALEDENOM (none scaled, fix size) ok are:
>>
>> * lines (not scaled) are dispayed correct (ok)
>> * outlines (not scaled) of polygones are dispayed correct (ok).
>> * symbols (not scaled) are displayed correct (ok).
>> * textes (not scaled) are displayed correct (ok).We tested not scaled
>> texts without SYMBOLSCALEDENOM: It's displayed different weather
>> MINSIZE/MAXSIZE is existing or not.
>>
>>
>> 2.) with SYMBOLSCALEDENOM
>>
>> NOT ok:
>>
>> * Scaled symbols are displayed incorrect - too small.
>> * Scaled lines are dispayed incorrect - too small.
>> * scaled outlines of polygones are dispayed incorrect.
>> * Scaled text are dispayed incorrect - too small.
>>
>> For us it would be good to get this problem solved, as at the moment we
>> generate a copy of the mapfile for the print with symbol- and labelsize
>> multiplyed with factor 4. It would be charming to solve the print with one
>> mapfile. We could do testing and maybe I could look for sponsoring too.
>>
>> Is there someone else interested to solve this? Is there a ticket already?
>>
>> Astrid
>>
>> thomas bonfort schrieb:
>>
>> cgi controls should do the trick?
>>
>> http://../?SERVICE=WMS&&MAP.RESOLUTION=144&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=96
>>
>> --
>> thomas
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 17:43, Peter Hopfgartner
>>  wrote:
>>
>> Basically, I am looking for a way to something analogous to
>>
>> DEFRESOLUTION in
>>
>> a WMS request. The standard says, that a pixel is 0.28 mm x 0.28 mm
>> (25.4/0.28 ~= 90.71 DPI). I could not found a way to change this in the
>>
>> WMS
>>
>> 1.3.0 standard.
>> Is there a MapServer vendor parameter, similar to the one in GeoServer,
>> http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/services/wms/vendor.html#f

Re: [mapserver-users] Specify resolution (or pixel size) in WMS requests

2012-07-18 Thread thomas bonfort
Thekla,
can you open a ticket for this one please ? I'll try to have a look at
it before the 6.2 release, but can't promise anything...

thanks,
thomas

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Thekla Wirkus
 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> last december 2011 Astrid wrote a mail about the behaviour of RESOLUTION and
> DEFRESOLUTION. We tested again with MapServer
> 6.2 and here are the results. The size of the symbols, texts and lines was
> not like we expected. They were often too small.
>
> Have a look at the mail from 14. december 2011
> http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/2011-December/071077.html
>
>
> We tested with MAP.RESOLUTION=288&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=72, SIZEUNINTS Meters,
> the scaled layers with SYMBOLSCALEDENOM 1.
> http://localhost/cgi-bin/mapserv62b1?map=/data/umn/resolution/map/resolution_test.map&MAP.RESOLUTION=288&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=72"&VERSION=1.1.1&REQUEST=GetMap&SERVICE=WMS&LAYERS=notscaledPoint,scaledPoint,notscaledLine,scaledLine,notscaledPolygon,scaledPolygon,Polygon_with_symbols,notscaledLabel,scaledLabel&STYLES=&SRS=EPSG:31466&BBOX=2517600,5672315,2518960,5673675&WIDTH=2000&HEIGHT=2000&FORMAT=image/png&BGCOLOR=0xff&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&EXCEPTIONS=application/vnd.ogc.se_xml
>
>
> The behaviour of MapServer 6.0 and MapServer 6.2 is just the same. This time
> we have a demo project where we tried the different cases. You can download
> it at:
>
> UMN:
>
> https://svn.wheregroup.com/download/mapserver_resolution.zip
>
> PDF:
> https://svn.wheregroup.com/download/mapserver_resolution_pdf.zip
>
>
>
> Results:
>
> POINTS
> * scaled or not scaled Points/Symbols: displayed correct, scaled and
> notscaled are the same in the map
>
> LINES
> * scaled lines: displayed correct
> * unscaled lines: too small (1:2000, 1:5000, 1:1000), correct (1:2)
>
> POLYGON
> * scaled Polygone/Outline: displayed correct
> * not scaled Polygone/Outline: too small (1:2000), correct (1:5000,
> 1:1,1:2)
> * scaled or not scaled Polygone with symbols: displayed correct
>
> LABEL
> * scaled Label: too small
> * not scaled Label: too big (1:1000, 1:2000, 1:5000, too small (1:2)
>
>
> For us it would be good to get this problem solved, as at the moment we
> generate a copy of the mapfile for the print with symbol- and labelsize
> multiplyed with factor 4. It would be charming to solve the print with one
> mapfile. We could do testing and maybe I could look for sponsoring too.
>
>
>
> Is there someone else interested to solve this? Is there a ticket already?
>
> Thekla
>
>
>
>
> On 14.12.2011 17:44, Astrid Emde wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> we tried the parameter MAP.RESOLUTION AND MAP.DEFRESOLUTION with
> MapServer 6.0.1 and made the following observations.
>
> We tested with RESOLUTION=288&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=72
>
> The size of the symbols and textes was not like we expected. They were
> often too small.
>
> We tested with and without the parameter SYMBOLSCALEDENOM
>
> 1.) without SYMBOLSCALEDENOM (none scaled, fix size) ok are:
>
> * lines (not scaled) are dispayed correct (ok)
> * outlines (not scaled) of polygones are dispayed correct (ok).
> * symbols (not scaled) are displayed correct (ok).
> * textes (not scaled) are displayed correct (ok).We tested not scaled
> texts without SYMBOLSCALEDENOM: It's displayed different weather
> MINSIZE/MAXSIZE is existing or not.
>
>
> 2.) with SYMBOLSCALEDENOM
>
> NOT ok:
>
> * Scaled symbols are displayed incorrect - too small.
> * Scaled lines are dispayed incorrect - too small.
> * scaled outlines of polygones are dispayed incorrect.
> * Scaled text are dispayed incorrect - too small.
>
> For us it would be good to get this problem solved, as at the moment we
> generate a copy of the mapfile for the print with symbol- and labelsize
> multiplyed with factor 4. It would be charming to solve the print with one
> mapfile. We could do testing and maybe I could look for sponsoring too.
>
> Is there someone else interested to solve this? Is there a ticket already?
>
> Astrid
>
> thomas bonfort schrieb:
>
> cgi controls should do the trick?
>
> http://../?SERVICE=WMS&&MAP.RESOLUTION=144&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=96
>
> --
> thomas
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 17:43, Peter Hopfgartner
>  wrote:
>
> Basically, I am looking for a way to something analogous to
>
> DEFRESOLUTION in
>
> a WMS request. The standard says, that a pixel is 0.28 mm x 0.28 mm
> (25.4/0.28 ~= 90.71 DPI). I could not found a way to change this in the
>
> WMS
>
> 1.3.0 standard.
> Is there a MapServer vendor parameter, similar to the one in GeoServer,
> http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/services/wms/vendor.html#format-options
> ?
>
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Hopfgartner R3 GIS http://www.r3-gis.com
> ___
> mapserver-users mailing list
> mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>
> ___
> mapserver-users m

Re: [mapserver-users] Specify resolution (or pixel size) in WMS requests

2012-07-16 Thread Thekla Wirkus


Hello,

last december 2011 Astrid wrote a mail about the behaviour of RESOLUTION 
and DEFRESOLUTION. We tested again with MapServer
6.2 and here are the results. The size of the symbols, texts and lines 
was not like we expected. They were often too small.


Have a look at the mail from 14. december 2011
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/2011-December/071077.html


We tested with MAP.RESOLUTION=288&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=72, SIZEUNINTS 
Meters, the scaled layers with SYMBOLSCALEDENOM 1.

http://localhost/cgi-bin/mapserv62b1?map=/data/umn/resolution/map/resolution_test.map&MAP.RESOLUTION=288&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=72"&VERSION=1.1.1&REQUEST=GetMap&SERVICE=WMS&LAYERS=notscaledPoint,scaledPoint,notscaledLine,scaledLine,notscaledPolygon,scaledPolygon,Polygon_with_symbols,notscaledLabel,scaledLabel&STYLES=&SRS=EPSG:31466&BBOX=2517600,5672315,2518960,5673675&WIDTH=2000&HEIGHT=2000&FORMAT=image/png&BGCOLOR=0xff&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&EXCEPTIONS=application/vnd.ogc.se_xml


The behaviour of MapServer 6.0 and MapServer 6.2 is just the same. This 
time we have a demo project where we tried the different cases. You can 
download it at:


UMN:

https://svn.wheregroup.com/download/mapserver_resolution.zip

PDF:
https://svn.wheregroup.com/download/mapserver_resolution_pdf.zip



Results:

POINTS
* scaled or not scaled Points/Symbols: displayed correct, scaled 
and notscaled are the same in the map


LINES
* scaled lines: displayed correct
* unscaled lines: too small (1:2000, 1:5000, 1:1000), correct 
(1:2)


POLYGON
* scaled Polygone/Outline: displayed correct
* not scaled Polygone/Outline: too small (1:2000), correct (1:5000, 
1:1,1:2)

* scaled or not scaled Polygone with symbols: displayed correct

LABEL
* scaled Label: too small
* not scaled Label: too big (1:1000, 1:2000, 1:5000, too small 
(1:2)




For us it would be good to get this problem solved, as at the moment we
generate a copy of the mapfile for the print with symbol- and labelsize
multiplyed with factor 4. It would be charming to solve the print with 
one

mapfile. We could do testing and maybe I could look for sponsoring too.



Is there someone else interested to solve this? Is there a ticket already?

Thekla



On 14.12.2011 17:44, Astrid Emde wrote:

Hello,

we tried the parameter MAP.RESOLUTION AND MAP.DEFRESOLUTION with
MapServer 6.0.1 and made the following observations.

We tested with RESOLUTION=288&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=72

The size of the symbols and textes was not like we expected. They were
often too small.

We tested with and without the parameter SYMBOLSCALEDENOM

1.) without SYMBOLSCALEDENOM (none scaled, fix size) ok are:

 * lines (not scaled) are dispayed correct (ok)
 * outlines (not scaled) of polygones are dispayed correct (ok).
 * symbols (not scaled) are displayed correct (ok).
 * textes (not scaled) are displayed correct (ok).We tested not scaled
texts without SYMBOLSCALEDENOM: It's displayed different weather
MINSIZE/MAXSIZE is existing or not.


2.) with SYMBOLSCALEDENOM

NOT ok:

 * Scaled symbols are displayed incorrect - too small.
 * Scaled lines are dispayed incorrect - too small.
 * scaled outlines of polygones are dispayed incorrect.
 * Scaled text are dispayed incorrect - too small.

For us it would be good to get this problem solved, as at the moment we
generate a copy of the mapfile for the print with symbol- and labelsize
multiplyed with factor 4. It would be charming to solve the print with one
mapfile. We could do testing and maybe I could look for sponsoring too.

Is there someone else interested to solve this? Is there a ticket already?

Astrid

thomas bonfort schrieb:

cgi controls should do the trick?

http://../?SERVICE=WMS&&MAP.RESOLUTION=144&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=96

--
thomas

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 17:43, Peter Hopfgartner
 wrote:

Basically, I am looking for a way to something analogous to

DEFRESOLUTION in

a WMS request. The standard says, that a pixel is 0.28 mm x 0.28 mm
(25.4/0.28 ~= 90.71 DPI). I could not found a way to change this in the

WMS

1.3.0 standard.
Is there a MapServer vendor parameter, similar to the one in GeoServer,
http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/services/wms/vendor.html#format-options
?

Peter

--
Peter Hopfgartner R3 GIS http://www.r3-gis.com
___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users

___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users




--


-

Thekla Wirkus
GIS-Consultant

--
Aufwind durch Wissen!

Qualifizierte OpenSource-Schulungen
bei der www.foss-academy.eu
---

WhereGroup GmbH & Co. KG
Eifelstraße 7
53119 Bonn
Germany

Fon: +49 (0)228 / 90 90 

Re: [mapserver-users] Specify resolution (or pixel size) in WMS requests

2011-12-14 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
Hi,

Could you possible create a couple of images showing what is the current 
situation and how would you like the image to look like, together with 
corresponding parts of mapfile and requests you have used?

-Jukka Rahkonen-

Astrid Emde wrote:

Hello,

we tried the parameter MAP.RESOLUTION AND MAP.DEFRESOLUTION with
MapServer 6.0.1 and made the following observations.

We tested with RESOLUTION=288&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=72

The size of the symbols and textes was not like we expected. They were
often too small.

We tested with and without the parameter SYMBOLSCALEDENOM

1.) without SYMBOLSCALEDENOM (none scaled, fix size) ok are:

* lines (not scaled) are dispayed correct (ok)
* outlines (not scaled) of polygones are dispayed correct (ok).
* symbols (not scaled) are displayed correct (ok).
* textes (not scaled) are displayed correct (ok).We tested not scaled
texts without SYMBOLSCALEDENOM: It's displayed different weather
MINSIZE/MAXSIZE is existing or not.


2.) with SYMBOLSCALEDENOM

NOT ok:

* Scaled symbols are displayed incorrect - too small.
* Scaled lines are dispayed incorrect - too small.
* scaled outlines of polygones are dispayed incorrect.
* Scaled text are dispayed incorrect - too small.

For us it would be good to get this problem solved, as at the moment we
generate a copy of the mapfile for the print with symbol- and labelsize
multiplyed with factor 4. It would be charming to solve the print with one
mapfile. We could do testing and maybe I could look for sponsoring too.

Is there someone else interested to solve this? Is there a ticket already?

Astrid

thomas bonfort schrieb:
> cgi controls should do the trick?
>
> http://../?SERVICE=WMS&&MAP.RESOLUTION=144&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=96
>
> --
> thomas
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 17:43, Peter Hopfgartner
>  wrote:
>> Basically, I am looking for a way to something analogous to
DEFRESOLUTION in
>> a WMS request. The standard says, that a pixel is 0.28 mm x 0.28 mm
>> (25.4/0.28 ~= 90.71 DPI). I could not found a way to change this in the
WMS
>> 1.3.0 standard.
>> Is there a MapServer vendor parameter, similar to the one in GeoServer,
>> http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/services/wms/vendor.html#format-options
>> ?
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> --
>> Peter Hopfgartner R3 GIS http://www.r3-gis.com
>> ___
>> mapserver-users mailing list
>> mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
> ___
> mapserver-users mailing list
> mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users


--

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Astrid Emde

--
Aufwind durch Wissen!

Qualifizierte OpenSource-Schulungen
bei der www.foss-academy.eu

--

 Astrid Emde
 WhereGroup GmbH & Co.KG
 Eifelstraße 7
 53119 Bonn
 Germany

 Fon: +49(0)228 90 90 38 - 19
 Fax: +49(0)228 90 90 38 - 11

 astrid.e...@wheregroup.com
 www.wheregroup.com

Amtsgericht Bonn, HRA 6788
---
Komplementärin:
WhereGroup Verwaltungs GmbH
vertreten durch:
Olaf Knopp, Peter Stamm
---
 pgp-public key:
 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x06DA52D72D515284
  Signierte und/oder verschlüsselte Nachrichten sind sehr willkommen
  Signed and/or encrypted mail is highly appreciated



___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users


Re: [mapserver-users] Specify resolution (or pixel size) in WMS requests

2011-12-14 Thread Astrid Emde
Hello,

we tried the parameter MAP.RESOLUTION AND MAP.DEFRESOLUTION with
MapServer 6.0.1 and made the following observations.

We tested with RESOLUTION=288&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=72

The size of the symbols and textes was not like we expected. They were
often too small.

We tested with and without the parameter SYMBOLSCALEDENOM

1.) without SYMBOLSCALEDENOM (none scaled, fix size) ok are:

* lines (not scaled) are dispayed correct (ok)
* outlines (not scaled) of polygones are dispayed correct (ok).
* symbols (not scaled) are displayed correct (ok).
* textes (not scaled) are displayed correct (ok).We tested not scaled
texts without SYMBOLSCALEDENOM: It's displayed different weather
MINSIZE/MAXSIZE is existing or not.


2.) with SYMBOLSCALEDENOM

NOT ok:

* Scaled symbols are displayed incorrect - too small.
* Scaled lines are dispayed incorrect - too small.
* scaled outlines of polygones are dispayed incorrect.
* Scaled text are dispayed incorrect - too small.

For us it would be good to get this problem solved, as at the moment we
generate a copy of the mapfile for the print with symbol- and labelsize
multiplyed with factor 4. It would be charming to solve the print with one
mapfile. We could do testing and maybe I could look for sponsoring too.

Is there someone else interested to solve this? Is there a ticket already?

Astrid

thomas bonfort schrieb:
> cgi controls should do the trick?
>
> http://../?SERVICE=WMS&&MAP.RESOLUTION=144&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=96
>
> --
> thomas
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 17:43, Peter Hopfgartner
>  wrote:
>> Basically, I am looking for a way to something analogous to
DEFRESOLUTION in
>> a WMS request. The standard says, that a pixel is 0.28 mm x 0.28 mm
>> (25.4/0.28 ~= 90.71 DPI). I could not found a way to change this in the
WMS
>> 1.3.0 standard.
>> Is there a MapServer vendor parameter, similar to the one in GeoServer,
>> http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/services/wms/vendor.html#format-options
>> ?
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> --
>> Peter Hopfgartner R3 GIS http://www.r3-gis.com
>> ___
>> mapserver-users mailing list
>> mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
> ___
> mapserver-users mailing list
> mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users


-- 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Astrid Emde

--
Aufwind durch Wissen!

Qualifizierte OpenSource-Schulungen
bei der www.foss-academy.eu

--

 Astrid Emde
 WhereGroup GmbH & Co.KG
 Eifelstraße 7
 53119 Bonn
 Germany

 Fon: +49(0)228 90 90 38 - 19
 Fax: +49(0)228 90 90 38 - 11

 astrid.e...@wheregroup.com
 www.wheregroup.com

Amtsgericht Bonn, HRA 6788
---
Komplementärin:
WhereGroup Verwaltungs GmbH
vertreten durch:
Olaf Knopp, Peter Stamm
---
 pgp-public key:
 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x06DA52D72D515284
  Signierte und/oder verschlüsselte Nachrichten sind sehr willkommen
  Signed and/or encrypted mail is highly appreciated



___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users


Re: [mapserver-users] Specify resolution (or pixel size) in WMS requests

2011-12-05 Thread thomas bonfort
cgi controls should do the trick?

http://../?SERVICE=WMS&&MAP.RESOLUTION=144&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=96

--
thomas

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 17:43, Peter Hopfgartner
 wrote:
> Basically, I am looking for a way to something analogous to DEFRESOLUTION in
> a WMS request. The standard says, that a pixel is 0.28 mm x 0.28 mm
> (25.4/0.28 ~= 90.71 DPI). I could not found a way to change this in the WMS
> 1.3.0 standard.
> Is there a MapServer vendor parameter, similar to the one in GeoServer,
> http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/services/wms/vendor.html#format-options
> ?
>
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Hopfgartner R3 GIS http://www.r3-gis.com
> ___
> mapserver-users mailing list
> mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users


[mapserver-users] Specify resolution (or pixel size) in WMS requests

2011-12-05 Thread Peter Hopfgartner
Basically, I am looking for a way to something analogous to 
DEFRESOLUTION in a WMS request. The standard says, that a pixel is 0.28 
mm x 0.28 mm (25.4/0.28 ~= 90.71 DPI). I could not found a way to change 
this in the WMS 1.3.0 standard.
Is there a MapServer vendor parameter, similar to the one in GeoServer, 
http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/services/wms/vendor.html#format-options 
?


Peter

--
Peter Hopfgartner R3 GIS http://www.r3-gis.com
___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users