[mapserver-users] To WFS, WMS or to WCS

2008-05-13 Thread Sarel Coetzer
Hi

Is there anywhere a brief explanation of the deferent types of map services
such as WFS, WMS and WCS.
What each service does differently then the other and how to identify which
one would be the correct service to use for a specific application.
I have read the various how to's on the wiki but I am trying to find a one
page comparison of capabilities/advantages or disadvantages of these various
services.


Regards
Sarel

Regards
Sarel

-- 
http://sarelgis.blogspot.com/;
___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users


Re: [mapserver-users] To WFS, WMS or to WCS

2008-05-13 Thread Kristian Thy
On Tue, May 13, Sarel Coetzer wrote:
 Is there anywhere a brief explanation of the deferent types of map services
 such as WFS, WMS and WCS.

WIYF:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Map_Service
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Feature_Service
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Coverage_Service

\\kristian
-- 
... et nemo ex vobis interrogat me: »Quo vadis?«
___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users


Re: [mapserver-users] To WFS, WMS or to WCS

2008-05-13 Thread Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS)

Hi Sarel,

I can probably explain it in a few sentences.

WMS is a web mapping service, so it is meant to render an image of data, 
be it vector or raster data. It only gives you back an image 
representation of your data.
WFS is a web feature service, it is meant to deliver the features (in 
vector format) to the client, so the raw data. The vector format is 
mostly GML (Geography Markup Language).
WCS is a web coverage service, it is the raster version of WFS, so to 
deliver raster coverages in a raw format to the client.


If you only need images and a query on a point click, stick with WMS. If 
you need your users to actually download data, you will need WFS + WCS.


There is also a thing called SLD WMS (Styled Layer Descriptor), where 
the WMS client can change the symbology of the map, and get an image 
back in different colors/patterns etc. than the default one advertized 
by the service.


Hope this helps. If you have further specific questions, don't hesitate 
to ask.


Best regards,
Bart

Sarel Coetzer wrote:

Hi

Is there anywhere a brief explanation of the deferent types of map 
services such as WFS, WMS and WCS.
What each service does differently then the other and how to identify 
which one would be the correct service to use for a specific application.
I have read the various how to's on the wiki but I am trying to find a 
one page comparison of capabilities/advantages or disadvantages of 
these various services.



Regards
Sarel

Regards
Sarel

--
http://sarelgis.blogspot.com/;


___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
  



--
Bart van den Eijnden
OSGIS, Open Source GIS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osgis.nl

___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users


Re: [mapserver-users] To WFS, WMS or to WCS

2008-05-13 Thread Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS)

Hi Sarel,

please cc the list since it might be useful for other people searching 
the archives one day.


1) AFAIK WMS server does not generate any images in the temp dir when 
using Mapserver in CGI mode. The WMS client in Mapserver does (so if you 
use remote WMS layers). I don't think WFS and WCS server store temporary 
images, but WFS client will store the file.


2) yes, you can use the same MAP file, see the OGC web services workshop.

3) it is not different, it just means the output format differs (so GML 
for WFS instead of e.g. image/png for WMS), the source data can be the same.


4) I am unaware of any KML support in Mapserver at the moment.

Best regards,
Bart

Sarel Coetzer wrote:


Thanks for the help Bart

 


Yes, I do have some questions.

 

-  WMS creates a lot of images in my temp folder (I have a 
batch files cleaning this out regularly ), does WCS/WFS create any 
temp images?


-  Would one mapfile be able to host all tree services?

-  For my MS WMS am thinking about using the FWTools to export 
my postGIS layers from server to client (clients format choice 
shpfile,mapinfo or kml), how would WCS or WFS handle this differently?


-  Last one (sorry!)  What type of service does KMLMapsever 
require, I have tried spitting out KML but I get an error in Google 
earth saying it has lost the network connection.


 

 


Many thanks


Regards
Sarel



On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS) 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi Sarel,

I can probably explain it in a few sentences.

WMS is a web mapping service, so it is meant to render an image of
data, be it vector or raster data. It only gives you back an image
representation of your data.
WFS is a web feature service, it is meant to deliver the features
(in vector format) to the client, so the raw data. The vector
format is mostly GML (Geography Markup Language).
WCS is a web coverage service, it is the raster version of WFS, so
to deliver raster coverages in a raw format to the client.

If you only need images and a query on a point click, stick with
WMS. If you need your users to actually download data, you will
need WFS + WCS.

There is also a thing called SLD WMS (Styled Layer Descriptor),
where the WMS client can change the symbology of the map, and get
an image back in different colors/patterns etc. than the default
one advertized by the service.

Hope this helps. If you have further specific questions, don't
hesitate to ask.

Best regards,
Bart

Sarel Coetzer wrote:

Hi

Is there anywhere a brief explanation of the deferent types of
map services such as WFS, WMS and WCS.
What each service does differently then the other and how to
identify which one would be the correct service to use for a
specific application.
I have read the various how to's on the wiki but I am trying
to find a one page comparison of capabilities/advantages or
disadvantages of these various services.


Regards
Sarel

Regards
Sarel

-- 
http://sarelgis.blogspot.com/;



___
mapserver-users mailing list

mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
mailto:mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
 




-- 
Bart van den Eijnden

OSGIS, Open Source GIS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osgis.nl




--
http://sarelgis.blogspot.com/; 



--
Bart van den Eijnden
OSGIS, Open Source GIS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osgis.nl

___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users