Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Updated (EN) tri-fold brochure

2011-05-20 Thread Tom Davies






From: drew d...@baseanswers.com
To: marketing@libreoffice.org
Sent: Tue, 17 May, 2011 16:15:04
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Updated (EN) tri-fold brochure

On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 20:59 -0400, drew wrote:

Howdy

Pushed a new update to the file on the wiki
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/cgi_img_auth.php/1/14/LibO-TriFild-Pamphlet-11-05-15-ltr-en.pdf


Some text updates coming from the us_mktg list, primarily the removal of the 
secondary line for supported platforms.

 (mentioning BSD on interior being one)
 
 Comments, suggestions welcomed as it is never really done, really, it's
 just tonights copy.
 

Thanks

Drew

ps - if you want todays odt file it is at
http://lo-portal.us/temp/LibOPamphlet-may-17.odt



Hi :)
I still don't see the point of removing or avoiding mentioning that LO can be 
run on other platforms, particularly when those platforms don't support MSO.  
There are 2 lines that say The free power-packed, Open Source, personal 
productivity suite for: and the next line misses out saying BSD although it 
looks as though there is plenty of room to mention it.  There would be more 
room 
if MS was missed off the front of MS Windows.  Are there non-MS versions of 
Windows?  Do MS require that MS is always put in front of Windows?  (in which 
case a vast amount of writing about Windows is in breach.)

Have i missed a day or 2 worth of emails explaining that LO suddenly doesn't 
work on BSD?  We tend not to hear from people where things have gone smoothly 
and have only heard from a couple of people that have had minor issues with LO 
on BSD.  I take that as a good sign.  I am not on the devs list so perhaps 
people there have decided that LO doesn't work?
Regards from
Tom :)

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-marketing] Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice 3.4 Release Notes

2011-05-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hah,

Ignore my previous slightly sharp mail wrt. testing - I had forgotten
you're doing all this great marketing research  work :-)

On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 09:07 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
 The object of this exercise is to see if we could have the release 
 notes, on the website page, released all at the same time for as many 
 language groups as possible. The release is planned for the end of May 
 or early days of June. We have about 10-11 days left.

Sounds great to me. As of some weeks ago, there are no features going
into the product, only bug fixes - so we should be clear for a long run
to get it nailed down and translated.

 * get images of different new features or fixes done in different 
 language. We should have the same protocols for image captures. Could 
 someone point me to these if they have ever been discussed or could we 
 have someone chime in and help out?

Ooh - difficult (and big) :-) The screenshots last time turned out to
be quite emotive: with people anxious about consistent platform, theme,
and so on - which added a real bottleneck to the screen-shotting
process.

 * get the translation of the release website page done before the 
 release of the new version. We need to coordinate this with the dev 
 group. I am not sure who gives the final say on when the new release if 
 put on the downloads website pages. Are you the person who OK's this?

So - final up-loads and tweaking of the download page / javascript
(etc.) are done by Thorsten, or Christian I guess, I'd ask them.

HTH,

Michael.

-- 
 michael.me...@novell.com  , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Updated (EN) tri-fold brochure

2011-05-20 Thread webmaster for Kracked Press Productions

On 05/20/2011 10:22 AM, drew wrote:

On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 15:08 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:





From: drewd...@baseanswers.com
To: marketing@libreoffice.org
Sent: Tue, 17 May, 2011 16:15:04
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Updated (EN) tri-fold brochure

On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 20:59 -0400, drew wrote:

Howdy

Pushed a new update to the file on the wiki
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/cgi_img_auth.php/1/14/LibO-TriFild-Pamphlet-11-05-15-ltr-en.pdf


Some text updates coming from the us_mktg list, primarily the removal of the
secondary line for supported platforms.


(mentioning BSD on interior being one)

Comments, suggestions welcomed as it is never really done, really, it's
just tonights copy.


Hi :)
I still don't see the point of removing or avoiding mentioning that LO can be
run on other platforms, particularly when those platforms don't support MSO.
There are 2 lines that say The free power-packed, Open Source, personal
productivity suite for: and the next line misses out saying BSD although it
looks as though there is plenty of room to mention it.  There would be more room
if MS was missed off the front of MS Windows.  Are there non-MS versions of
Windows?  Do MS require that MS is always put in front of Windows?  (in which
case a vast amount of writing about Windows is in breach.)



Have i missed a day or 2 worth of emails explaining that LO suddenly doesn't
work on BSD?  We tend not to hear from people where things have gone smoothly
and have only heard from a couple of people that have had minor issues with LO
on BSD.  I take that as a good sign.  I am not on the devs list so perhaps
people there have decided that LO doesn't work?
Regards from

Hi Tom

No one is saying it doesn't work on BSD - the discussion on the US mktg
list was more to do with What platforms do you find when you visit the
main LibO site and in that respect the answer is, these three (win,
linux, OS X). So the idea was to keep the marketing piece in alignment
with the website.

Finally, there is a reason this is done on the open mailing list - so if
you have some specific wording?

Thanks
Does LibreOffice's web site tell people how to install it on BSD?  They 
have a help page for installing it on Linux.  If we do list BSD on the 
pamphlet, we will need to be read for questions for installing it on 
BSD.  I know how to do Windows and Ubuntu/Deb installs, and I gave the 
NA DVD to a friend [Monday] that uses a Mac.  I have not heard anything 
yet about problems with the Mac install.  I only have Windows XP and 
Vista, plus Ubuntu 10.04LTS for my operating systems so I have never 
tried to install it on MacOSX.


So if there is not references to BSD install, maybe we should say 
Windows, Linux, MacOSX, and other platforms, with the other 
platforms in the small print.


We could debate the wording back-and-forth to the point where we do not 
like such-and-such word or coma placement, but the real point is do we 
have the generalized or major points covered?  If we state everything we 
could about why you should use LibreOffice, we would have a booklet 
instead of a pamphlet.  Maybe one day that might happen, but right now 
we need to get it finalized for our first official publication.


Hopefully Drew will have the time to place the NA DVD project's ISO 
files[s] online and post the URL.  Then we can tweak the paperwork as 
needed.  I think it is time that we give the marketing community the 
chance to download the DVD and try it themselves, instead of just 
testing it out online.  The DVD label for the first DVD is finished.  
The DVD insert seems to be ready [except any minor tweaks people want].  
The DVD cover sheet is ready.  The pamphlet is ready, except for any 
work that we feel could make it better.  So that seems to be everything 
we need to publish our DVD except the URL of the ISO file.  Then 
people will have a chance to work with our English Windows/Linux/MacOSX 
DVD [including a Windows portable version].  Then we can finish the 
editing of the English Windows-only DVD and do its paperwork for it to 
be out there instead of just a test version online.  Then maybe we can 
get more of our Spanish users/marketers to look at our Spanish language 
version of these DVD so we can have it worked on fast enough to have it 
ready sometime in the summer for its publication.  Thanks to some 
members in South America, and other places, we have been able to start 
the Spanish version of our project.


So do we NEED to list all the platforms that LibreOffice can be used on, 
for just the 3 major ones?
Is there anything else that is blocking our publication of our 
project?  Can we say we are done and get the ISO file online and have an 
official announcement, maybe on the announcement list, that the English 
version of our project it ready for people to use?




--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: 

Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Updated (EN) tri-fold brochure

2011-05-20 Thread Tom Davies






From: C. Olofson c.olof...@gmail.com
To: marketing@libreoffice.org
Sent: Fri, 20 May, 2011 18:17:14
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Updated (EN) tri-fold brochure

On 05/20/2011 08:06 AM, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote:
 On 05/20/2011 10:22 AM, drew wrote:
 On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 15:08 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
 
 
 
 
 From: drewd...@baseanswers.com
 To: marketing@libreoffice.org
 Sent: Tue, 17 May, 2011 16:15:04
 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Updated (EN) tri-fold brochure
 
 On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 20:59 -0400, drew wrote:
 
 Howdy
 
 Pushed a new update to the file on the wiki
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/cgi_img_auth.php/1/14/LibO-TriFild-Pamphlet-11-05-15-ltr-en.pdf
f 

 
 
 Some text updates coming from the us_mktg list, primarily the removal of the
 secondary line for supported platforms.
 
 (mentioning BSD on interior being one)
 
 Comments, suggestions welcomed as it is never really done, really, it's
 just tonights copy.
 
 Hi :)
 I still don't see the point of removing or avoiding mentioning that LO can 
be
 run on other platforms, particularly when those platforms don't support MSO.
 There are 2 lines that say The free power-packed, Open Source, personal
 productivity suite for: and the next line misses out saying BSD although 
it
 looks as though there is plenty of room to mention it.  There would be more 
room
 if MS was missed off the front of MS Windows.  Are there non-MS 
 versions 
of
 Windows?  Do MS require that MS is always put in front of Windows?  (in 
which
 case a vast amount of writing about Windows is in breach.)
 
 Have i missed a day or 2 worth of emails explaining that LO suddenly doesn't
 work on BSD?  We tend not to hear from people where things have gone 
smoothly
 and have only heard from a couple of people that have had minor issues with 
LO
 on BSD.  I take that as a good sign.  I am not on the devs list so perhaps
 people there have decided that LO doesn't work?
 Regards from
 Hi Tom
 
 No one is saying it doesn't work on BSD - the discussion on the US mktg
 list was more to do with What platforms do you find when you visit the
 main LibO site and in that respect the answer is, these three (win,
 linux, OS X). So the idea was to keep the marketing piece in alignment
 with the website.
 
 Finally, there is a reason this is done on the open mailing list - so if
 you have some specific wording?
 
 Thanks
 Does LibreOffice's web site tell people how to install it on BSD?
Nope.  We don't: http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/installation/
 If we do list BSD on the pamphlet, we will need to be read for questions for 
installing it on BSD.
At this point, we're taking our lead from the LibO website.  It mentions only 
the three OSes.
 So if there is not references to BSD install, maybe we should say Windows, 
Linux, MacOSX, and other platforms, with the other platforms in the small 
print.
In principle, I like that and that definitely sounds like the way to go.  I 
believe that the Debian project is as popular as it is, in no small part, for 
the prominence they give to being a cross-platform product.  But, I'd rather 
defer that until later.  Reason is, in my opinion, due diligence would require 
us to get marketing, doc  support each to address this statement.
 So do we NEED to list all the platforms that LibreOffice can be used on, for 
just the 3 major ones?
I'm pretty sure we already settled on the 3.
 Is there anything else that is blocking our publication of our project?
I'll defer to those who've been proofing more closely.

Craig



Hi :)
Ok, i think the pamphlet has been ready for quite a long time now.  It's 
getting 
better but it already was good enough.  Do we need it to be perfect first time? 
 
I don't believe there is any such thing as perfection.  


I don't think we need instructions for all the different OSes, especially if 
the 
Dvd is the Windows-only version.  Windows users often need quite a lot of 
hand-holding but often linux users are new to linux so they need help too as 
they still have bad habits and mis-information left over from their Windows 
days.  By contrast Bsd users are likely to already have a lot of unix based 
experience and be fairly used to advanced ways of installing, such as compiling 
from source.  We don't need to scare or confuse non-Bsd users by explaining 
those, especially in a pamphlet for the Windows-only version.  It's enough just 
to mention the platform.  


Or, going the other way isn't it dangerous to mention non-Windows platforms?  
Is 
it wise to mention other platforms at all?

Regards from
Devil's Advocate :)
-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Updated (EN) tri-fold brochure

2011-05-20 Thread Tom Davies






From: drew d...@baseanswers.com
To: marketing@libreoffice.org
Sent: Fri, 20 May, 2011 15:22:42
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Updated (EN) tri-fold brochure

On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 15:08 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 From: drew d...@baseanswers.com
 To: marketing@libreoffice.org
 Sent: Tue, 17 May, 2011 16:15:04
 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Updated (EN) tri-fold brochure
 
 On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 20:59 -0400, drew wrote:
 
 Howdy
 
 Pushed a new update to the file on the wiki
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/cgi_img_auth.php/1/14/LibO-TriFild-Pamphlet-11-05-15-ltr-en.pdf
f
 
 
 Some text updates coming from the us_mktg list, primarily the removal of the 
 secondary line for supported platforms.
 
  (mentioning BSD on interior being one)
  
  Comments, suggestions welcomed as it is never really done, really, it's
  just tonights copy.
  

 
 Hi :)
 I still don't see the point of removing or avoiding mentioning that LO can be 
 run on other platforms, particularly when those platforms don't support MSO.  
 There are 2 lines that say The free power-packed, Open Source, personal 
 productivity suite for: and the next line misses out saying BSD although 
 it 

 looks as though there is plenty of room to mention it.  There would be more 
room 

 if MS was missed off the front of MS Windows.  Are there non-MS versions 
 of 

 Windows?  Do MS require that MS is always put in front of Windows?  (in 
 which 

 case a vast amount of writing about Windows is in breach.)


 Have i missed a day or 2 worth of emails explaining that LO suddenly doesn't 
 work on BSD?  We tend not to hear from people where things have gone smoothly 
 and have only heard from a couple of people that have had minor issues with 
 LO 

 on BSD.  I take that as a good sign.  I am not on the devs list so perhaps 
 people there have decided that LO doesn't work?
 Regards from

Hi Tom

No one is saying it doesn't work on BSD - the discussion on the US mktg
list was more to do with What platforms do you find when you visit the
main LibO site and in that respect the answer is, these three (win,
linux, OS X). So the idea was to keep the marketing piece in alignment
with the website.

Finally, there is a reason this is done on the open mailing list - so if
you have some specific wording?

Thanks



Hi :)
Yes, i was thinking of changing those few lines to;

The free power-packed, Open Source, personal productivity suite for:
Windows  GNU/Linux  BSD  Mac OS X

At the moment that last line reads
MS Windows  GNU/Linux  Mac OS X

So, my suggestion would only add 1 letter to the line and there appears to be 
just about enough space for that.
Regards from
Tom :)
-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Updated (EN) tri-fold brochure

2011-05-20 Thread toki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 20/05/2011 20:23, Tom Davies wrote:

 Do we need it to be perfect first time?  
 I don't believe there is any such thing as perfection.  

Over time, the brochure will change.

 Or, going the other way isn't it dangerous to mention non-Windows platforms?  
 Is 
 it wise to mention other platforms at all?

The brochure should list the OSes found on the DVD.

On the DVD you can have a more extensive document that states what
operating systems LibO has been compiled for, and where to obtain the
compiled binaries, and source code.

If there is enough space on the brochure, you can state the half dozen
or so operating systems that Windows users have never heard of, that
LibO has been ported to.

If LibO is ported to Android, iOS (Apple), or Blackberry OS, then a
different brochure for mobile platforms can be constructed.

If LibO is ported to XrossMediaBar, Xbox 360 system software, or Wii
system software, then a different brochure for gaming platforms can be
constructed. (I can see it now: How to use the Wii nunchak to edit an
Impress presentation.)

jonathon
- -- 
If Bing copied Google, there wouldn't be anything new worth requesting.

If Bing did not copy Google, there wouldn't be anything relevant worth
requesting.

  DaveJakeman 20110207 Groklaw.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN1uliAAoJEERA7YuLpVrV5qsIANpBLRqb0VdAxNPEE69ExHPO
jo1NgN9KqWyEZU+odnih26mFwKPLfeL3/yeUo5HFbgZ3Oz/fCga0dmKbM0hLxJxS
6tRRUUSZKCBIBarhdUC7S1zd6ELgcT5li7Nnr+tWXyHQHY76V/TRipHdDINwcOGz
J+I8NHrbyt4dB5rBphyuh9vFgpMVajY18dWYzEZBtNJvOI/it4eXQpzp/r8jaA4U
i1x/XIg2pEAGXDa1OSyTLOUTXs0dkuSfcEFKs9OMduxfBrgJKYxSZDVfT/H88CSv
Q3QV/5SOm5h6zvZoGci15ZW6n0FteJHmUrdlbtDLb0wVjFP9KpLNAuQddHhgrrU=
=wSfa
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Updated (EN) tri-fold brochure

2011-05-20 Thread webmaster for Kracked Press Productions

On 05/20/2011 04:23 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
snip

Hi :)
Ok, i think the pamphlet has been ready for quite a long time now.  It's getting
better but it already was good enough.  Do we need it to be perfect first time?
I don't believe there is any such thing as perfection.


I don't think we need instructions for all the different OSes, especially if the
Dvd is the Windows-only version.  Windows users often need quite a lot of
hand-holding but often linux users are new to linux so they need help too as
they still have bad habits and mis-information left over from their Windows
days.  By contrast Bsd users are likely to already have a lot of unix based
experience and be fairly used to advanced ways of installing, such as compiling
from source.  We don't need to scare or confuse non-Bsd users by explaining
those, especially in a pamphlet for the Windows-only version.  It's enough just
to mention the platform.


Or, going the other way isn't it dangerous to mention non-Windows platforms?  Is
it wise to mention other platforms at all?

Regards from
Devil's Advocate :)
We started with the 3 platform DVD like the German's did with their 
initial woke.  But as things were being discussed about what extension, 
templates, samples, etc., should be removed or should be added, I 
started the process of removing all the non-Windows references from a 
copy of the DVD.  There were only 4[?] pages that needed editing and the 
rest were exactly the same as the 3 platform version.  So I ended up 
doing the work on the Windows-only DVD.  I think it may need editing of 
my edits, but still it was a start while the extension and template 
pages were being worked on by others.


At events where there are Linux and Mac users, having a 3 platform DVD 
is proper.  For those places that there are a lost of Windows users, 
having a Windows-only version can be helpful.  For those who are going 
to download an ISO file, and use only Windows, having a 1.4 GB download 
instead of a 3.2 GB is important.


So for me, at an event table, it would be nice to have side-by-side both 
versions.  For those people that know about the other platforms, knowing 
that LibreOffice will work on all three major ones can be a selling 
point, since MSO works on Windows and maybe an after thought on making 
an older version work on MacOSX.  Forget Linux.  So if you have someone 
know that no matter what computers you use, you should be able to use 
LibreOffice on all of them.  Cross platform may be very important to 
them.  For people that do not know anything about Linux or Mac except 
the name, they may need to have a DVD that only has Windows references 
on it.  They might think cross platform is a good idea, but may not know 
what it really is or why it is needed since they have never used a 
non-Windows machine except for their smart phones or e-readers.


To be honest, for may users, the more you tell them about how it works 
or other technical issues the more confused they can become.  Some will 
even avoid a product that may sound too technical to use or deal with.  
A lot of Windows users can hardly install a simple package by 
double-clicking on the .exe file.  I know many of these users.  Some do 
not even know how to browse through their hard drives to find a 
miss-filed document.  Some are stumped on how to do anything other than 
use the Internet browser, the email client, and maybe a simple word 
processor.  So we need to be able to have some document/pamphlet that 
work work for them.  But, the real users of LibreOffice should be those 
who know a thing or two about their computers or how to use them more 
than just email and web browsing.  So we need our main documentation to 
work for them.


So, have the main Win/Linux/MacOSX DVD, the Windows-only DVD, and later 
maybe have a CD or DVD that is geared to the user that does not know how 
to do much of anything beyond the web.  But for now we have the first 
two, and that is all we really need.


If you need a different platform, then you most likely know much more 
about using it than we would.


If you need a very simple hand-holding install package, you most likely 
either not need LibreOffice or have someone that will do the install for 
you and teach you how to do anything you need to do.


Actually, I kind of like HP's Linux driver system.  You run a .run file 
and ask a few Y/N questions, and then the script does all the 
downloading, compiling/making, and anything else that is needed to get 
the printers installed on your version of Linux.  I would hate to do all 
that myself via the terminal, even with detailed instructions.  It would 
be nice if all you had to do was run an .exe file to install any/all of 
you packages instead of having to use the terminal to type in commands 
for those packages that you cannot install by double-clicking on the 
.deb file.  But if it was easy as Windows, it may be as faulty/crash-y 
as Windows can be.




--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to 

Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Updated (EN) tri-fold brochure

2011-05-20 Thread webmaster for Kracked Press Productions

On 05/20/2011 06:21 PM, toki wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 20/05/2011 20:23, Tom Davies wrote:


Do we need it to be perfect first time?
I don't believe there is any such thing as perfection.

Over time, the brochure will change.


Or, going the other way isn't it dangerous to mention non-Windows platforms?  Is

  it wise to mention other platforms at all?

The brochure should list the OSes found on the DVD.

That is does.

On the DVD you can have a more extensive document that states what
operating systems LibO has been compiled for, and where to obtain the
compiled binaries, and source code.

We do not have the page[s] for developers and hackers, like the German 
DVD had when we started this NA project.  Thought that it would confuse 
the normal user and for those who would want that info, the files on 
the DVD would be way out-of-date withing a week of our reediting of the 
DVD file contents for that section.

If there is enough space on the brochure, you can state the half dozen
or so operating systems that Windows users have never heard of, that
LibO has been ported to.

If LibO is ported to Android, iOS (Apple), or Blackberry OS, then a
different brochure for mobile platforms can be constructed.

Windows, Linux [.deb, .rpm], MacOSX [Intel, PPC], plus the Windows 
portable version.

That is what is on the main DVD.

Plus, except for Windows, there are only a few language files other than 
English.  It would be too much to have all 113 languages on one DVD.  We 
do English, Spanish, French, and a few more [mostly nitch ones].


As for Android and the other ports, I have not really heard much about 
those, but hope they will come with the popularity of the iPad style of 
systems.  Now you have system that use your HDTV for web browsing and 
social network work.  Could you next do office suite work as well?



If LibO is ported to XrossMediaBar, Xbox 360 system software, or Wii
system software, then a different brochure for gaming platforms can be
constructed. (I can see it now: How to use the Wii nunchak to edit an
Impress presentation.)

jonathon
- -- 
If Bing copied Google, there wouldn't be anything new worth requesting.


If Bing did not copy Google, there wouldn't be anything relevant worth
requesting.

   DaveJakeman 20110207 Groklaw.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN1uliAAoJEERA7YuLpVrV5qsIANpBLRqb0VdAxNPEE69ExHPO
jo1NgN9KqWyEZU+odnih26mFwKPLfeL3/yeUo5HFbgZ3Oz/fCga0dmKbM0hLxJxS
6tRRUUSZKCBIBarhdUC7S1zd6ELgcT5li7Nnr+tWXyHQHY76V/TRipHdDINwcOGz
J+I8NHrbyt4dB5rBphyuh9vFgpMVajY18dWYzEZBtNJvOI/it4eXQpzp/r8jaA4U
i1x/XIg2pEAGXDa1OSyTLOUTXs0dkuSfcEFKs9OMduxfBrgJKYxSZDVfT/H88CSv
Q3QV/5SOm5h6zvZoGci15ZW6n0FteJHmUrdlbtDLb0wVjFP9KpLNAuQddHhgrrU=
=wSfa
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted