[Marxism] Personal narrative of police terror in Chicago. NYT exposes NYPD rioting upon New Yorkers. Trump policy: much more police violence.
POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * https://twitter.com/RickAndRollBaby/status/1284636567076831232 https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/07/14/nyregion/nypd-george-floyd-protests.html https://www.motherjones.com/anti-racism-police-protest/2020/07/trump-border-patrol-cities-portland-chicago/ _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Glenn Greenwald was cancelled from the Harper's Letter warning about "cancel culture" / Boing Boing
POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * https://boingboing.net/2020/07/19/glenn-greenwald-was-cancelled.html _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Trump Leans Into False Virus Claims in Combative Fox News Interview
POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * NY Times, July 19, 2020 Trump Leans Into False Virus Claims in Combative Fox News Interview By Katie Rogers WASHINGTON — An agitated President Trump offered a string of combative and often dubious assertions in an interview aired Sunday, defending his handling of the coronavirus with misleading evidence, attacking his own health experts, disputing polls showing him trailing in his re-election race and defending people who display the Confederate flag as victims of “cancel culture.” The president’s remarks, delivered in an interview on “Fox News Sunday,” amounted to a contentious potpourri more commonly found on his Twitter feed and at his political rallies. The difference this time was a vigorous attempt by the host, Chris Wallace, to fact-check him, leading to several clashes between the two on matters ranging from the coronavirus response to whether Mr. Trump would accept the results of the election should he lose. The Coronavirus The president made a litany of false claims about his administration’s handling of the virus, despite evidence that key officials and public health experts advising the president made crucial missteps and played down the spread of the disease this spring. In the interview, Mr. Trump falsely claimed that the United States had “one of the lowest mortality rates in the world” from the virus. “That’s not true, sir,” Mr. Wallace said. “Do you have the numbers, please?” Mr. Trump said. “Because I heard we had the best mortality rate.” The United States has the eighth-worst fatality rate among reported coronavirus cases in the world, and the death rate per 100,000 people — 42.83 — ranks it third-worst, according to data on the countries most affected by the coronavirus compiled by Johns Hopkins University. Mr. Trump said that by increasing testing, his administration was “creating trouble for the fake news to come along and say, ‘Oh, we have more cases.’” Mr. Trump falsely claimed that the coronavirus case rate in other countries was lower than in the United States because those nations did not engage in testing. When Mr. Wallace pointed out a low case rate across the European Union, the president suggested it was possible that those countries “don’t test.” And when Mr. Wallace pointed out that the death rate in the United States was rising, Mr. Trump replied by blaming China. “Excuse me, it’s all too much, it shouldn’t be one case,” Mr. Trump said. “It came from China. They should’ve never let it escape. They should’ve never let it out. But it is what it is. Take a look at Europe, take a look at the numbers in Europe. And by the way, they’re having cases.” Mr. Trump called Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the nation’s top infectious disease expert, an “alarmist” who provided faulty information in the early days of the coronavirus pandemic. “I don’t know that he’s a leaker,” Mr. Trump said during the interview. “He’s a little bit of an alarmist. That’s OK. A little bit of an alarmist.” Mr. Trump said that Dr. Fauci had been against his decision to close the borders to travelers from China in January. That is misleading: While Dr. Fauci initially opposed the idea on the grounds that a ban would prevent medical professionals from traveling to hard-hit areas, he supported the decision by the time it was made. Mr. Trump also said Dr. Fauci had been against Americans wearing masks. Dr. Fauci has said he does not regret urging Americans not to wear masks in the early days of the pandemic, citing a severe shortage of protective gear for medical professionals at the time. Mr. Trump said he doubted whether Dr. Robert R. Redfield, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was correct in predicting that the pandemic would be worse this fall. “I don’t know,” Mr. Trump said. “And I don’t think he knows.” He said public health experts and the World Health Organization “got a lot wrong” early on, including a theory that the virus would abate as the weather warmed — one that Mr. Trump himself had promoted repeatedly. Then the president reiterated his earlier claim, unsupported by science, that the virus would suddenly cease one day. “It’s going to disappear, and I’ll be right,” Mr. Trump said. “Because I’ve been right probably more than anybody else.” The Election Mr. Trump insulted Fox News pollsters as “among the worst” when presented with data that showed him trailing former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., the presumptive Democratic nominee, claiming that he had seen polls that showed him winning. “I understand you still have more than 100 days to this election, but at this point y
[Marxism] Japan Cuts 2020 | Louis Proyect: The Unrepentant Marxist
POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * Like other film festivals I’ve reviewed since the pandemic began, this year’s Japan Cuts (https://japancuts.japansociety.org/) is virtual. While nothing will ever match the experience of see a film on the big screen among other film buffs, the show must go on as they say in a Busby Berkeley film—can’t remember which one. At $99 for the entire festival or $7 per film, it is certainly worth it. In the past, when I have covered a NY film festival, I always regretted that many of my out-of-town readers will never be able to take part. Fortunately, for them and for the filmmakers who put so much time, money and energy making leading-edge cinema, virtuality has its benefits. Time constraints did not allow me to cover more than four films but based on what I have seen, this festival is a must for film buffs. Japanese films have been a mainstay of serious cinema for the past seventy years and it is still going strong. full: https://louisproyect.org/2020/07/19/japan-cuts-2020/ _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Fwd: H-Net Review [H-Socialisms]: Bekken on Keith, 'When It Was Grand: The Radical Republican History of the Civil War'
POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * Best regards, Andrew Stewart - - - Subscribe to the Washington Babylon newsletter via https://washingtonbabylon.com/newsletter/ Begin forwarded message: > From: H-Net Staff via H-REVIEW > Date: July 19, 2020 at 7:13:50 AM EDT > To: h-rev...@lists.h-net.org > Cc: H-Net Staff > Subject: H-Net Review [H-Socialisms]: Bekken on Keith, 'When It Was Grand: > The Radical Republican History of the Civil War' > Reply-To: h-rev...@lists.h-net.org > > LeeAnna Keith. When It Was Grand: The Radical Republican History of > the Civil War. New York Hill and Wang, 2019. 352 pp. $30.00 > (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8090-8031-1. > > Reviewed by Jon Bekken (Albright College) > Published on H-Socialisms (July, 2020) > Commissioned by Gary Roth > > When Republicans Were Radicals > > _When It Was Grand: The Radical Republican History of the Civil War_ > focuses on the emergence of the Republican Party from the 1850s > through the brief triumph of Reconstruction, with particular emphasis > on its Radical faction and their determination to bring an end to > slavery. The Radicals, LeeAnna Keith contends, dominated the > Republican Party in its early years, transforming the American polity > in the process: "The Radicals were culture warriors, committed to a > nearly mystical vision of representative government based on free > labor. Prizing equal opportunity and expansion, they championed > government spending for education and transportation > infrastructure These Republicans appealed to populism without > demonizing capital" (p. 4). This is a stirring narrative, with much > emphasis on armed conflict and political intrigue. But some of the > broader facets of this radicalism are eclipsed by the focus on what > was indisputably the major issue of the day. Keith notes the > important role of women's suffrage advocates in the movement and the > insistence of many (by no means all) Radicals on full racial > equality, not simply an end to the institution of slavery. But while > slavery was certainly the central issue, the struggle for its > abolition was part of a larger social ferment that saw the formation > of utopian colonies, the emergence of unions, and movements for > religious and social reform. Indeed, as it was moving from the Whigs > to the Republicans, the _New York Tribune_ published a series of > articles praising Pierre-Joseph Proudhon's mutualism and gave Karl > Marx a regular column that ran for a decade. > > The political system was already in crisis when debates over the > expansion of slavery forced the long-suppressed issue to the fore. > Keith suggest that Stephen Douglas was (inadvertently) "the founding > father of the Republican Party" through his 1854 Kansas-Nebraska > bill, which overturned the Missouri Compromise in an effort to > appease increasingly aggressive southern slaveholders (p. 10). But > the two-party system was already in tatters. Never a stable political > formation, the Whigs had been united primarily by their opposition to > Andrew Jackson and their commitment to building infrastructure to > promote commerce and industry. Democrats and Whigs shared a common > commitment to preserving the status quo on slavery, if only because > the South's electoral strength made it difficult to win national > elections without carrying at least some southern states. But the > status quo was not sustainable. Southern politicians saw westward > expansion as an existential threat to their political dominance and > so demanded the extension of slavery to the new > territories--something that was both economically untenable and an > intolerable affront to the growing numbers appalled by slavery. > Ultimately, this dispute shattered both parties. Western Democrats > like John Wentworth originally condemned abolitionists as fanatics, > but could tolerate neither the expansion of slavery nor their party's > increasingly implacable opposition to internal improvements. > (Wentworth correctly saw Chicago's future as inextricably bound up > with the development of canals and railroads.) In 1848 he opposed the > new Free Soil Party on the grounds that it threatened to deliver > Illinois's electoral votes to the Whigs he still despised (noting in > his _Chicago Democrat_ that Whig presidential nominee Zachary Taylor > was a slave owner). Free Soilers, Know-Nothings, Anti-Nebraska > Democrats (such as Wentworth), and the remnants of the Whigs > ultimately coalesced under the Republican Party banner, united by > little else but their opposition to slavery's expansion. > > Keith discusses the coalescing of these forces and the early bat
[Marxism] Mike Phillips: What's Left of the Nicaraguan Revolution.
POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * "What remains of the Nicaraguan Revolution is greatly imperilled – by imperialism, but also by what’s left of its former leadership. Some on the left understand this. Noam Chomsky has called for early elections. Pablo Iglesias of Podemos in Spain, and former Uruguayan President José Mujica have also been sharply critical of Ortega. None of these individuals seek to promote US government interests. Rather, they understand that defending the gains of the Nicaraguan Revolution requires the orderly exit of the corrupt dynasty that has betrayed it. Others on the left also need to find their voice and separate the great achievements of the Sandinista Revolution from the regime in charge today." Mike Phillips: What's Left of the Nicaraguan Revolution. https://labourhub.org.uk/2020/07/19/whats-left-of-the-nicaraguan-revolution/ Andrew Coates _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Doug Greene and Harrison Fluss on Spinoza�s Radical Enlightenment
POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * The Radical Enlightenment starts with Baruch Spinozaâs materialist philosophy. There is a direct line from Spinoza to Marx and Engels via the French Revolution. Why Spinoza? Why does Jonathan Israel â and for that matter, many Marxists â consider Spinoza so central a philosopher? Why did the precursors of Marx, such as Feuerbach, call Spinoza, âthe Moses of the modern free-thinkers and materialists,â and why did Heine even compare Spinoza to Christ?1 What accounts for all this celebration? It is that Spinozaâs philosophy represents the sharpest break with ancient and medieval worldviews, inaugurating a new beginning. Unlike the rationalism of René Descartes or Gottfried Leibniz, Spinozaâs was monistic; it rejected Descartesâs incomplete break with the Catholic Church, as well as Leibnizâs attempt to cloak theism in reason. The British empiricists, such as John Locke, likewise cut deals between knowledge and traditional faith. All these figures made concessions to God and throne. This was a shamefaced Enlightenment, ashamed of its own power of reason. Out of these early modern intellectuals, it was Spinoza who most clearly rejected all supernatural admixtures with reason. It is with him that philosophical modernity truly begins. (More at) https://tinyurl.com/y3g9t2e7 Jim Farmelant http://independent.academia.edu/JimFarmelant http://www.foxymath.com Learn or Review Basic Math Sponsored by https://www.newser.com/?utm_source=part&utm_medium=uol&utm_campaign=rss_taglines_more Trump Exiles Clinton, Bush Portraits at White House http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/5f1451321f0c051317c4cst02vuc1 2 GOP Senators Honor the Wrong Black Congressman http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/5f1451323f53851317c4cst02vuc2 Olympics Figure Skater Dies at 20 in Moscow http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/5f1451325f91b51317c4cst02vuc3 _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Unnatural Disasters | Ann Neumann
POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * Ending the poaching of chimpanzees, elephants, and other wild animals is a cause that the West can rally around, but it’s the symptom of a much larger problem: capitalist globalization has led international corporations to extract labor, hardwood, fish, and other resources from countries that are too weak or corrupt—due to legacies of colonial exploitation—to care for their own people. Last year, two American companies, Roseburg Forest Products and Evergreen Hardwoods, were charged with harvesting protected wood from West Africa. But such charges are infrequent, their penalties no real deterrent. https://thebaffler.com/salvos/unnatural-disasters-neumann _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] The little-known role Sweden played in the colonial slave trade - The Local
POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * https://www.thelocal.se/20200615/how-can-sweden-better-face-up-to-its-colonial-past _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Black people — many of them immigrants — make up less than 2 percent of Maine’s population but almost a quarter of its coronavirus cases
POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * Washington Post, JULY 18, 2020 ‘I’m scared’ Black people — many of them immigrants — make up less than 2 percent of Maine’s population but almost a quarter of its coronavirus cases Maine does not collect data for immigrants, following federal guidelines, but officials said contact tracing showed that many of those affected are immigrants or their children. The population of Lewiston, shown here, includes refugees. By Maria Sacchetti WESTBROOK, Maine — Workers at a red-brick factory called American Roots had to decide amid a pandemic whether to come back to work. Instead of the usual sweatshirts and knit caps, they would churn out masks to protect front-line workers from the novel coronavirus. Or they could take the safer route: Stay home and collect unemployment. Almost all were immigrants from Africa or the Middle East, and workers said none of them flinched when they gathered on the factory floor that morning in March. Everyone voted to keep stitching. “I’m not scared,” said Maria Lutina, 42, an asylum seeker from Angola and the factory’s head stitcher who helped design the masks. “Americans, they need it.” Immigrants and refugees help power Maine, America’s oldest and whitest state, by picking blueberries, packing meat and tending to the elderly far from the fancy resorts on Vacationland’s rocky coast. But in a state that has one of the lowest rates of coronavirus infections, a pattern has emerged: Black Mainers — many of them immigrants — have been infected at disproportionate rates, accounting for approximately 23 percent of the cases in a state where they are less than 2 percent of the population. American Roots has not been spared; state officials announced Thursday that 11 employees have tested positive for the virus. Two of the state’s 115 coronavirus deaths have been among black Mainers, who health officials said tend to be younger and less likely to exhibit symptoms of the virus’s disease, covid-19. But advocates for immigrants say many have been ill, and a state lawmaker warned that black residents in Maine and nationwide are facing the “twin pandemics” of systemic racism that hinders access to health care, and a virus that has disproportionately infected people of color. The most recent state data show that at least 836 of more than 3,600 Mainers who have had the coronavirus are black. Maine does not collect data for immigrants, following federal guidelines, but officials said contact tracing showed that many of those affected are immigrants or their children. Latinos account for a smaller number of cases, about 145 infections. Leaders of immigrant organizations said Maine initially was slow to offer testing, provide bilingual contact tracers and directly invest in immigrant organizations that know the communities best. Much of the initial funding went to mostly white-led organizations that subcontract with immigrant groups. State officials say they are scrambling to address the racial disparity by expanding testing and health care, and finding ways to provide direct aid to immigrant groups to prevent the virus’s spread. Officials are also hiring more bilingual staff members and have translated coronavirus information into at least 11 other languages. “We know we’ve had long-standing racial disparities in our health-care system, and we know that racism is a problem in Maine, as it is elsewhere,” said Jeanne Lambrew, the state’s Health and Human Services commissioner. “So we are trying to obviously act with urgency because we are trying to prevent what we’re seeing from getting worse.” Nationwide, the vast majority of black people are native-born U.S. citizens, according to the Census Bureau, but in more than a dozen states including New York, Massachusetts, the Dakotas and Minnesota, large shares of the black population are immigrants. They face racial discrimination and language or cultural barriers that can impede efforts to stop the coronavirus’s spread, such as public briefings about the pandemic that are only in English. Almost half the black people in Maine are immigrants, the highest share in the nation. Most are from African nations including Somalia and the Democratic Republic of Congo. [Maine’s Vacationland hot spots are ghost towns as tourism struggles amid coronavirus] Although the spread of the coronavirus among black residents has slowed in recent weeks, advocates for immigrants warn that conditions in Maine are ripe for a spike in infections if officials do not reach immigrants directly. Ines Mugisha, a 34-year-old immigrant from Burundi, said her husband, a home health-care aide
[Marxism] Capital Wars | Michael Roberts Blog
POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * We’ve had the argument that the major global issue of the 21st century is the growing trade and technology war between the US and China. In their book, Trade Wars are Class Wars, Klein and Pettis reckon that the trade imbalances are cause by inequality and income and consumption in the two powers: China has ‘excess savings’ and the US has ‘excess consumption’. I have argued that this argument is false in previous posts. https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2020/07/19/capital-wars/ _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Beyond Work? The Shortcomings of Post-Work Politics - COSMONAUT
POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * Mikael Lyngaas argues that post-work theorists ranging from Bob Black to Srnicek and Williams are utopian socialism for the current era. https://cosmonaut.blog/2020/07/18/beyond-work-the-shortcomings-of-post-work-politics/ _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Kareem Abdul-Jabbar: Where Is the Outrage Over Anti-Semitism in Sports and Hollywood?
POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * Anyone else notice that KAJ seems to have an awfully narrow idea of what "Anti-Semitism in Hollywood" looks like? Almost like he is only looking for anti-Semitism among those who fit a very particular description. Perhaps he was trained in identifying anti-Semitism by the NYPD chiefs behind Stop-and-Frisk. Even the white Jew he goes after is under attack for reblogging Farrakhan. Let's be serious, we are undergoing one of most massive Black-led rebellions against racism and capitalism in decades and they are recycling the same manipulative nonsense that they have used since they torched SNCC and the BPP fifty years ago. They can't come out and accuse Blacks of being "anti-white" and so-forth because it will strengthen white nationalism and thereby exacerbate racial tensions in the U.S. So instead they are digging through (mostly has-been) Black celebrities' statements looking for empty rhetoric so they can portray Black people as enemies of other minority groups with the (very obvious) dog whistle that the primary concern is offense toward those who have been assimilated into whiteness. The witch-hunt for anti-Semitism is post-CRM white supremacy. KAJ's comments that they are wrong-headed because Black people and Jews have both suffered discrimination is pretty tonedeaf. Every single one of these comments that are prompting scrutiny, no matter how crude or conspiratorial they are, are a form of *punching up*. None of the comments by Nick Cannon, Ice Cube, etc. are about suggesting that Jews need to be put in their place, that they should be terrorized with lynchings to prevent them from organizing for better jobs, etc. None of them are about using racial terror to discipline others. So the comparison is, frankly, offensive. The motivation behind these comments is pretty obvious; like other crude explanations of racial capitalism, they are attempts to explain the enormous success and cultural influence of Jews, including in Hollywood, that Blacks continue to lack outside of a small coterie of wealthy elites. I also want to note something that I find particularly demeaning about the attacks on Chelsea Handler. Handler, who is both white and Jewish, posted a video of Farrakhan on Phil Donahue's talk show (where he interviewed various fringe figures in the 1980s and 1990s), and it prompted likes from other prominent white women, including Jessica Chastain, Jennifer Garner, Jennifer Aniston, and Michelle Pfieffer. That is, all of these very prominent, and very white, and in some cases very Jewish, women expressed their sympathy and support for Farrakhan's comments. And anyone who has actually seen the video (which is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMpICsEa3l0) knows exactly why. No matter what blame Farrakhan deserves for derailing the Black resistance, causing Malcolm X's death, being unhinged, etc., anyone who watches his interview with Donahue will see that Farrakhan and his supporters were saying things in 1985 that were impermissible in American society until 2014, especially when he begins arguing with the audience: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMpICsEa3l0#t=18m0s KAJ and others are shaming white women when they actually listen rather than when they defend Joe Biden (that is, when they are doing what is right instead of what is white). Amith R. Gupta On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 3:04 AM Alan Ginsberg via Marxism < marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu> wrote: > POSTING RULES & NOTES > #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. > #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. > #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. > * > > > https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/kareem-abdul-jabbar-is-outrage-anti-semitism-sports-hollywood-1303210 > _ > Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm > Set your options at: > https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/amithrgupta%40gmail.com > _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
