Re: [Marxism] Comintern (The Stalinist-Hoxhaist World Party)

2010-04-16 Thread Tom Cod
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


more detailed discussion of Wang from International Viewpoint, an organ of
the Usec Fourth International:

http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article251

http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article251a excerpt
pertinent to this discussion:

Quixotically, Wang and Chen Duxiu tried to win armed forces to a policy of
resistance combined with rural revolution. The CCP, hundreds of times bigger
and with a decade of military experience and some Soviet support,
effortlessly eclipsed them. After the war, the Trotskyists resumed their
campaign for radical democracy and class struggle in the cities. They were
as if blind to Mao’s peasant armies, poised by 1949 to seize power
everywhere on the mainland.

Wang spent the first years of his exile reflecting on the causes of the
Maoist victory and the Trotskyist defeat. In a departure from Trotskyist
orthodoxy, he found that a real revolution had indeed taken place under Mao.
He criticized his own group’s failure to develop armed forces and mobilize
the peasants as one part of their activities. Yet he continued to question
the overwhelmingly military thrust of Maoist strategy, which he feared in
some ways was just another link in China’s endless chain of wars followed by
tyrannical restorations. Instead, he argued for the centrality of the
industrial workers and the intelligentsia, new urban classes that offered a
way of unlocking the cycle with an experiment in democratic communism.

Other Trotskyists around Peng Shuzhi, in exile in the United States,
denounced Wang for ’capitulating’ to Stalinism. The row was symptomatic of
the Trotskyists’ fractiousness, which left them even more vulnerable to
their many enemies.

Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Comintern (The Stalinist-Hoxhaist World Party)

2010-04-16 Thread Tom Cod
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


And there sure wasn't one in Korea in 1950.

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:15 PM, S. Artesian sartes...@earthlink.netwrote:


 The reason it didn't happen in 1949?  Despite Mao's pretensions, there was
 NO alliance with the bourgeoisie.



Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Comintern (The Stalinist-Hoxhaist World Party)

2010-04-16 Thread Shane Mage
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


Zheng Chaolin: Chen Duxiu and the Trotskyists
Chen Duxiu told Peng Shuzhi that if Qu Qiubai had been on the Central  
Committee in Shanghai, Zheng Chaolin would never have ended up in such  
a way. ...
www.marxists.org/history/etol/document/china/zheng.htm - Cached -  
Similar

On Apr 16, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Tom Cod wrote:

 Shane:
 Zhen Duxiu (founder of the May Fourth Movement and then of the  
 Chinese
 Communist Party) who wound up imprisoned by the Maoist Stalinists
 for the rest of his life, for one.

 Well, Wikipedia indicates that he was imprisoned by the Kuomintang,  
 not the
 CCP, was released and then died during the war in 1942, not that he  
 wasn't a
 decent and worthy person.


Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Comintern (The Stalinist-Hoxhaist World Party)

2010-04-15 Thread Dan
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


Concerning Mao, let's not forget murdering over 70 million people.
Correct idea?  Correct practice? 
Correct dialectic?

According to Chang and Halliday, Mao would add to the 5-year plans, 5-year 
repression plans, claiming on the eve of each new
red terror that 5% (or 10% or 20%) of the Chinese population was reactionary 
and had to be eliminated.
When party officials told him that taking away 60% of peasants' crops would 
result in mass starvation (38 million people
died during the great leap forward and the cultural revolution), he would 
scream : You cannot obey my orders because of your conscience ?
What nonsense ! Conscience is anti-Marxist. Marxism is brutality ! Brutality 
and more brutality ! or People will not obey us because they
love us ! They will obey us because they are terrified of us ! or Teenagers 
must become accustomed to brutality. They must become the
most brutal element in our society.. etc.

Correct idea? Correct practice? 
Correct dialectic?







Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Comintern (The Stalinist-Hoxhaist World Party)

2010-04-14 Thread S. Artesian
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


No.  All ideas are not ideologies.  Marxism is neither an idea nor an 
ideology.  Capitalism is not an idea, nor is it an ideology.  Political 
economy, capitalism's self-justification, is an ideology, in that it 
obscures the material functioning, and of, capital.

- Original Message - 
From: Tom Cod tomc...@gmail.com


 Yeah but aren't all ideas ideological to the extent they are ideas, even 
 the
 methodology of materialist analysis which itself could be reified into an
 idealist construct. 



Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Comintern (The Stalinist-Hoxhaist World Party)

2010-04-14 Thread Tom Cod
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


I think that's right, although capital either as equipment/tools/realty
(fixed capital) or money or financial instruments are surely objects,
but as you say, ones that are part of the social system we call capitalism

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Matt Bewig matt2...@gmail.com wrote:


 Not to be picky, but I would argue that capitalism is not a thing, but
 a characteristic pattern of social relationships arising from the
 separation of labor from ownership of the means of production, which are
 things whose owners pay wages to workers in exchange for their labor
 power.  This is why, I believe, Marxism has always taught that capital
 is best understood as a relationship rather than as a thing.

 Matt Bewig



Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Comintern (The Stalinist-Hoxhaist World Party)

2010-04-14 Thread Tom Cod
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


I dunno, he was a principal leader of one of the biggest social revolutions
in human history.

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:01 AM, S. Artesian sartes...@earthlink.netwrote:



 They sure don't come from Mao's ding dong school of pseudo-dialectics.




Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Comintern (The Stalinist-Hoxhaist World Party)

2010-04-14 Thread S. Artesian
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


And do you think that revolution was a product of correct ideas?  Of his 
pontification on dialectics?

And his opening to the west in 1972?  Correct idea?  Correct practice? 
Correct dialectic?
The Cultural Revolution?  Correct idea?  Correct practice?  Correct 
dialectic?
The Great Leap Forward?  Correct idea?  Correct practice?  Correct 
dialectic?

Uncritical support of Sukharno in Indonesia, disarming, more or less, 
communists in Indonesia prior to the Suharto coup?  Correct idea?  Corect 
practice?  Correct dialectic?

Consciousness being transformed into matter?  A universe of change?  Geez, I 
can't think of any more effective way to rob Marx's dialectic of its 
strength, its specificity in analyzing the concrete social relations of 
production, than by turning it into a metaphysical philosophy of universal 
change, which of course is a philosophy of the abstract incapable of dealing 
with the concrete-- or, short version, turning it into an ideology.

In the meantime, FRB has released its Beige Book at: 
http://www.federalreserve.gov/fomc/beigebook/2010/20100414/default.htm

My take:  treading water while waiting for the levee to break.


- Original Message - 
From: Tom Cod tomc...@gmail.com 



Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Comintern (The Stalinist-Hoxhaist World Party)

2010-04-13 Thread Tom Cod
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


Yeah but aren't all ideas ideological to the extent they are ideas, even the
methodology of materialist analysis which itself could be reified into an
idealist construct.  In that regard, I had an interesting encounter with a
roommate circa 1981, who was an ostensible follower of Ayn Rand and
objectivism when we lived in this house who kept harassing this hippie guy
who also lived there.  His basis was that this Head wasn't in touch with
Objective Reality but it was clear to me both from his ideas and his
demeanor that this guy wasn't either, objective reality being a construct
of ethereal right wing prejudices in his mind, so I pointed out to him that
I didn't know who was more delusional, in fact I thought he was (see this
counter, this is reality buddy, not some fucking idea in your head about Ayn
Rand, Barry Goldwater or the myths of John Galt).  His objectivism was shown
later when he became a sucker for the Amway scam (unlike me, who to him
lacked motivation to succeed).

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:52 PM, S. Artesian sartes...@earthlink.netwrote:


 Here's the problem-- you think the present condition of capitalist America
 may be the result of Randian libertarian thinking.  Marxists will tell
 you, after telling you Marxism is no ideology, that the libertarian
 thinking
 is a result of the codition of capitalist America.  Difference between
 ideology and materialist analysis; small difference perhaps, but it's all
 the difference.


 - Original Message -
 From: Christian cchrist...@bellsouth.net


 
 Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
 Set your options at:
 http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/tomcod3%40gmail.com


Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Comintern (The Stalinist-Hoxhaist World Party)

2010-04-12 Thread Christian
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


On 4/12/2010 6:39 PM, S. Artesian wrote:
 In general, and in particular, I advise staying clear of ideologies.  Marx's
 analysis and it revolutionary impact is highly unideological, highly
 concrete.  Stalinism is a bit more than a personality cult, having a bit
 more responsibility for what happened to the prospects for the international
 socialist revolution than, say, Bakuninism, or Ayn Randism.



I get to thinking sometimes that the present state of affairs in 
capitalist America may be the result of
Randian libertarian thinking among the ruling class and most of the 
working class.

Also, I speculate that the present sorry state of most of the so-called 
Left throughout the world
is due more to crypto-Bakuninism than to Leninism per se.

I think Marx would disagree with your opinion about his work's impact 
being highly unideological.
Marx's work may have practical significance but it never ceases, not for 
a moment, to be ideological.


Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Comintern (The Stalinist-Hoxhaist World Party)

2010-04-12 Thread Tom Cod
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


What you mean crypto-bakunisist?

http://www.struggle.ws/anarchism/writers/anarcho/Proyect_reply.htmhttp://www.struggle.ws/anarchism/writers/anarcho/Proyect_reply.html

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Christian cchrist...@bellsouth.net wrote:


 Also, I speculate that the present sorry state of most of the so-called
 Left throughout the world
 is due more to crypto-Bakuninism than to Leninism per se.



Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com