Re: [Matplotlib-users] ANN: matplotlib-0.99.3

2010-06-01 Thread Alan G Isaac
On 6/1/2010 9:06 AM, John Hunter wrote:
 We have uploaded a bugfix release of the matplotlib-0.99 branch.



For the binaries, what is the recommended NumPy version?
I assume the current release (1.4.1)?

(Also wondering, not that it's any of my business, whether the
current refactoring project for NumPy has implications for the
upcoming MPL 1.0 relase.)

Thanks!
Alan Isaac

PS Btw, it gets said often but once more won't hurt:
Matplotlib is wonderful!


--

___
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users


Re: [Matplotlib-users] ANN: matplotlib-0.99.3

2010-06-01 Thread Tommy Grav

On Jun 1, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:

 PS Btw, it gets said often but once more won't hurt:
 Matplotlib is wonderful!

I just wanted to second this. Having suffered many years
with super mongo, matplotlib (and python in general) has
made my work so much easier.

Tommy Grav
++
Associate Researcher @ Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
Johns Hopkins University
++
tg...@pha.jhu.edu
(410) 516-7683
http://web.mac.com/tgrav/Astronomy/Welcome.html
++




--

___
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users


Re: [Matplotlib-users] ANN: matplotlib-0.99.3

2010-06-01 Thread John Hunter
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 6/1/2010 9:06 AM, John Hunter wrote:

 For the binaries, what is the recommended NumPy version?
 I assume the current release (1.4.1)?

Are you on windows?  The windows binaries are build against numpy
1.3.0 so any and numpy since then should be good since they are
forward but not backward compatible.  At lease that is my
understanding.  The OSX binaries are built against numpy 1.2.1 so any
numpy after than should work.


 (Also wondering, not that it's any of my business, whether the
 current refactoring project for NumPy has implications for the
 upcoming MPL 1.0 relase.)

Are you referring to the refactoring to try and make numpy more
accessible as a C library?   That has no implications for 1.0, since
we are hoping to get that out soon and the numpy project is
multi-month at least.  In any case, mpl 1.0 should be able to be
compiled against all the recent numpys in the wild.

 PS Btw, it gets said often but once more won't hurt:
 Matplotlib is wonderful!

Thanks!  Jae-Joon Lee, Michael Droettboom, Ryan May, and Eric Firing
have been doing the heavy lifting on the regular development work, and
we continue to see lots of fantastic contributions from users.  I'm
just trying to keep up :-)  There is really a lot of fantastic stuff
in the upcoming 1.0 so I look forward to getting that out soon.


JDH

--

___
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users


Re: [Matplotlib-users] ANN: matplotlib-0.99.3

2010-06-01 Thread Samuel Teixeira Santos
I just want confirm because I new here

on my server I have this scpy 0.7.2, numpy 1.4.1, matplotlib 0.99.1.1.

may I keep that?

thanks

2010/6/1 John Hunter jdh2...@gmail.com

 On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote:
  On 6/1/2010 9:06 AM, John Hunter wrote:

  For the binaries, what is the recommended NumPy version?
  I assume the current release (1.4.1)?

 Are you on windows?  The windows binaries are build against numpy
 1.3.0 so any and numpy since then should be good since they are
 forward but not backward compatible.  At lease that is my
 understanding.  The OSX binaries are built against numpy 1.2.1 so any
 numpy after than should work.


  (Also wondering, not that it's any of my business, whether the
  current refactoring project for NumPy has implications for the
  upcoming MPL 1.0 relase.)

 Are you referring to the refactoring to try and make numpy more
 accessible as a C library?   That has no implications for 1.0, since
 we are hoping to get that out soon and the numpy project is
 multi-month at least.  In any case, mpl 1.0 should be able to be
 compiled against all the recent numpys in the wild.

  PS Btw, it gets said often but once more won't hurt:
  Matplotlib is wonderful!

 Thanks!  Jae-Joon Lee, Michael Droettboom, Ryan May, and Eric Firing
 have been doing the heavy lifting on the regular development work, and
 we continue to see lots of fantastic contributions from users.  I'm
 just trying to keep up :-)  There is really a lot of fantastic stuff
 in the upcoming 1.0 so I look forward to getting that out soon.


 JDH


 --

 ___
 Matplotlib-users mailing list
 Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users

--

___
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users


Re: [Matplotlib-users] ANN: matplotlib-0.99.3

2010-06-01 Thread Samuel Teixeira Santos
I will prefer update it very soon

thanks for the response


2010/6/1 John Hunter jdh2...@gmail.com

 On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Samuel Teixeira Santos
 arcano...@gmail.com wrote:
  I just want confirm because I new here
 
  on my server I have this scpy 0.7.2, numpy 1.4.1, matplotlib 0.99.1.1.

 You can, but I recommend upgrading mpl to 0.99.3 or setting
 'path.simplify : False' in your matplotlibrc because there is a
 serious bug in the path simplification algorithm in 0.99.1 that was
 fixed in 0.99.3.  You can work around the bug by turning off
 path.simplify or you can upgrade your mpl.

 path.simplify is an rc parameter which can be customized according the
 instructions at
 http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/users/customizing.html


 JDH

--

___
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users