Re: [Midnight Commander] #2: savannah: UTF-8 locales not supported
Hi all, On po 5. ledna 2009, Ticket System wrote: #2: savannah: UTF-8 locales not supported -+- - Reporter: slavazanko | Owner: slavazanko Type: defect | Status: accepted Priority: major | Milestone: UTF8 Support Component: mc-core | Version: Resolution: |Keywords: Blocking: | Blockedby: -+- - Changes (by slavazanko): * owner: = slavazanko * status: new = accepted * milestone: Recode Support = UTF8 Support Comment: I propose this patches: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xbenes5/projects/mc/mc- utf8.tar.gz Link from: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc- devel/2007-December/msg1.html IMHO, this more right patches than patches from Fedora, Suse etc (no stupid #ifdef..#else...#endif in many source files). The ifdefs should not be the main criteria to judge the quality of patches. They are there to allow compilation without wchar.h. I think that they can be easily replaced by some wrapper functions if neccessary. Here are other points: The distributions patches: - are much more tested and the most of places in the code that needs changes was already identified and fixed somehow - the implementation uses utf-8 strings in mc itself and wchar_t strings in editor Patches from http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xbenes5: - do not include utf-8 support in editor at all - there was not so much testing - I didn't look at the implementation details Vladimir ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
[MPORTANT]: Created new default query for tickets
Hey, I've created one new default queriy for tickets: If someone has found a patch for a issue reported in a ticket and add this patch to this specific ticket, he can add a review keyword to the keywords list. If this keyword exists there this ticket will show up under this url: http://www.midnight-commander.org/report/9 This should make it easier to track patches which needs a review and make the time in between several reviews a bit shorter. But please do also not forget if you got a patch reviewed by someone and there are errors/difficulties to remove the keyword until the patch is fixed. So that this list is always as short as possible. Greetings Winnie ps: There are some smaller patches which currently need a review by someone ;-) -- . '' ` . Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~winnie - http://www.der-winnie.de `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [r...@rover.dkm.cz: [repo.or.cz] midnight-commander clone completed]
* Pavel Roskin pro...@gnu.org schrieb: Hi, Thousands of OSS projects get mirrored all around the world, even without explicit knowledge of the devs, and - as far as I know - nobody feels pissed about that. What's the problem ? I don't want to be responsible for an obsolete repository. Which one is obsolete now ? And why are you resposible ? I believe it's important that the project developers act as a team and coordinate their actions. What is there to coordinate on just some dumb unofficial mirror ? Its name and who is responsible for mirroring. What kind of responsibility do you have in mind ? It's nothing more than like someone sets up an daily wget -R on some ftp server and tells the world where to reach this mirror. Wait, you really feel kicked-away, just because your mirror isn't the only one anyomore ? Quite strange, IMHO. There is no need for two mirrors on one site. Probably not. But does it hurt ? BTW: I didn't know that there's already another mirror. While reading the git docs I just came around that mirroring service and tried it out. Nothing more. If you don't have any use for the new mirror, just ignore it. Probably it will timeout after a while if nobody uses it. The only problem with the existing mirror was that you didn't control it. No, not for me - I don't have the slightest intent do control it. Actually, there is nothing to control - the mirrors are done 100% automatically. Right, and you did a great job. You volunteered to do an dirty, but important job, nobody else was willing to do. And I don't think anyone here won't appreciate that. So you *are* a valueable member of the team, and I don't see how some additional, uninteresting git mirror can change that fact. Thanks. I'm unsubscribing from the lists now and I'm not going to continue this discussion. Please don't, just because of that dumb mirror. It has nothing to do with your contributions. cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ - Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ - ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [MPORTANT]: Created new default query for tickets
* Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org schrieb: Hi, If someone has found a patch for a issue reported in a ticket and add this patch to this specific ticket, he can add a review keyword to the keywords list. If this keyword exists there this ticket will show up under this url: great ! Perhaps we could extend it a bit: * add votes via keywords (eg. vote-username) * if there are enough votes (currently: 2 devs), add the keyword approved. * patches that need rework get the rework keyword instead of review Could you please set up some more quries for this ? cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ - Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ - ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [MPORTANT]: Created new default query for tickets
Hey * add votes via keywords (eg. vote-username) * if there are enough votes (currently: 2 devs), add the keyword approved. * patches that need rework get the rework keyword instead of review Could you please set up some more quries for this ? Done.. also added a cleanup keyword. Valid keywords are now: * vote-your_username (You've voted positiv for the patch attached) * approved (Two or more dev's have voted) * rework (Patch is not okay and need a rework) * cleanup (Patch is basically okay but need some cleanup) * review (reviews are needed) Greetings Winnie -- . '' ` . Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~winnie - http://www.der-winnie.de `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
