Re: [MBZ] OT, cummins, experts chime in

2006-07-22 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
Im moving on, going to look at trucks in tulsa probably, found many 
other cheaper ones.


Robert  Tara Ludwick wrote:

I'd price around to see what a rear end shop would charge to do a 
complete rebuild on the rear end, and work them down that plus some for 
aggravation, and then if you need to you could just pickup a whole axel 
from a boneyard and swap it out yourself and come out ahead..


-Robert

Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:

Well I went and test drove a couple of dodge cummins today. First up was 
a 05 1 ton dually, long bed, 4 door, 4 wheel drive , with leaver in the 
floor for switching, with 6 speed manual.  I liked it for the fact that 
it has the 6 speed, seems like it would get better mileage than the 
autos.  It needs all new tires pretty soon, especially in the back and 
probably alignment.  Rode like a 1 ton of course.  Shifted good.  Is a 
BIG truck.  Seems like the rear end was howling.  Are they supposed to 
howl on these?  Price as 23k had 101k miles.  Next truck was a 03 2500, 
short bed, electronic 4 wheel drive, automatic, 4 door.  It had leather, 
rode smoother, didnt pull to one side.  Price on it was 21.5k.  I can 
say I REALLY love that cummins motor after driving one of them.  What do 
you cummins ownere thing about this?  Good prices?  Keep looking?  What 
kind of mileage will that 1 ton get with the 6 speed?  Will it be worse 
than the other truck with automatic 3/4 ton?  The thing that had me 
worried was the rear end howling on the other 1 ton truck.
 




___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com





--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
 91 300D 2.5 Turbo, 90 420SEL, 89 560SEL, 87 420SEL, 87 300SDL,
 85 380SE, 85 300D, 84 190D 2.2, 83 300TD, 81 300TD, 81 240D,
 76 240D, 76 300D, 74 240D, 73 280SEL 4.5, 72 250C, 69 250
http://www.striplin.net



Re: [MBZ] OT, cummins, experts chime in

2006-07-22 Thread kevin kraly

Im moving on, going to look at trucks in tulsa probably, found many
other cheaper ones.

Good decision, happy truck hunting to you!

Kevin in Hillsboro Oregon
1981 300CD 204K miles, Giesela AKA Granny 



Re: [MBZ] OT, cummins, experts chime in

2006-07-21 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
Because the howl changed/went away with load.  Those trucks book at 
around 30k for the 05 and around 26k for the 03


Donald Snook wrote:
Kaleb wrote: 

 

The thing that had me 


worried was the rear end howling on the other 1 ton truck.

 


I am not an expert on these trucks, I don't know enough to be a novice,
but one thing you said struck me. 

 


Didn't you say it needed tires?  How do you know the howl is not tire
noise. I had a howl from my old Chevy 4X4 and it ended up being the
tires.  

 


23K for a truck with 101K miles?  I don't know how much these trucks
are, but that sounds like a lot of dough for that many miles.  I guess a
lot of it must have been highway miles to put 100,000 miles on it in two
years. 

 

 


Donald H. Snook

McDonald, Tinker, Skaer, Quinn  Herrington, P.A. 


300 West Douglas

P.O. Box 207

Wichita, Kansas 67201 0207

Tel. (316) 263-5851

This confidential message may be subject to the attorney-client
privilege or protected by the attorney work-product doctrine. If you
have received this message in error, please delete it and notify me.  

 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com





--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
 91 300D 2.5 Turbo, 90 420SEL, 89 560SEL, 87 420SEL, 87 300SDL,
 85 380SE, 85 300D, 84 190D 2.2, 83 300TD, 81 300TD, 81 240D,
 76 240D, 76 300D, 74 240D, 73 280SEL 4.5, 72 250C, 69 250
http://www.striplin.net



Re: [MBZ] OT, cummins, experts chime in

2006-07-21 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
Well I cant really go with a manual trans, because the wife cant drive 
it and refuses to learn.  Something about a bad knee.  The auto is 
easier anyway, but I like the command of a stick.  The ones with the 
fuel pressure taking out the ip are the 98-02 I believe.  The 03 and up 
went to the common rail injection etc, have WAY more power and are much 
more quiet.


Levi Smith wrote:


Personally I'd go with the 05'.  But then again I guess I'd want more info
on the rear end...  I know I've heard the newer models (like since 98) you
have to be sure not to lose fuel pressure or they tend to take out the IP...

I know what you mean about enjoying them...  My dad's got a 97 or 98 Cummins
Dually with a flat bed/side racks with dump.  That thing just hauls.  You
throw a trailer that weighs a couple tons on there and a tractor that weighs
another 3-5 ton or so on there and it barely cares
As compared to his 05' 1500 with the 4.7l engine in it that won't hold 70mph
in 5th gear going up a hill by itself.  It's not a dog, 5th is a pretty high
gear.  But you throw JUST that trailer on the back and you can practically
forget doing much in 5th unless there's absolutely no incline and no need to
accelerate.

That Cummins torque is addicting...  Now if only I could get one in my Benz
or something the size of a Dakota...  (:
Hey Mike, you ought to throw one of THOSE in your M37!

Oh yeah my uncle (also named Mike) has like a 95 2500 Cummins chassis that
he put on one of those like late 60's sweptline Dodge bodies on.  Looks
pretty cool.  Apparently his has been upgraded though as his has a lot more
top end pull to it.

Sorry I'm not more help there Kaleb, but the mention of those Cummins really
gets the AR AR (grunt grunt as Tim Allen would do) flowing!  (:

Levi

On 7/20/06, Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Well I went and test drove a couple of dodge cummins today. First up was
a 05 1 ton dually, long bed, 4 door, 4 wheel drive , with leaver in the
floor for switching, with 6 speed manual.  I liked it for the fact that
it has the 6 speed, seems like it would get better mileage than the
autos.  It needs all new tires pretty soon, especially in the back and
probably alignment.  Rode like a 1 ton of course.  Shifted good.  Is a
BIG truck.  Seems like the rear end was howling.  Are they supposed to
howl on these?  Price as 23k had 101k miles.  Next truck was a 03 2500,
short bed, electronic 4 wheel drive, automatic, 4 door.  It had leather,
rode smoother, didnt pull to one side.  Price on it was 21.5k.  I can
say I REALLY love that cummins motor after driving one of them.  What do
you cummins ownere thing about this?  Good prices?  Keep looking?  What
kind of mileage will that 1 ton get with the 6 speed?  Will it be worse
than the other truck with automatic 3/4 ton?  The thing that had me
worried was the rear end howling on the other 1 ton truck.
--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
 91 300D 2.5 Turbo, 90 420SEL, 89 560SEL, 87 420SEL, 87 300SDL,
 85 380SE, 85 300D, 84 190D 2.2, 83 300TD, 81 300TD, 81 240D,
 76 240D, 76 300D, 74 240D, 73 280SEL 4.5, 72 250C, 69 250
http://www.striplin.net

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com





--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
 91 300D 2.5 Turbo, 90 420SEL, 89 560SEL, 87 420SEL, 87 300SDL,
 85 380SE, 85 300D, 84 190D 2.2, 83 300TD, 81 300TD, 81 240D,
 76 240D, 76 300D, 74 240D, 73 280SEL 4.5, 72 250C, 69 250
http://www.striplin.net



Re: [MBZ] OT, cummins, experts chime in

2006-07-21 Thread Jim Cathey
Personally I'd go with the 05'.  But then again I guess I'd want more 
info
on the rear end...  I know I've heard the newer models (like since 98) 
you
have to be sure not to lose fuel pressure or they tend to take out the 
IP...


So far as I know, only the 24-valve non-common-rail engines have this
issue.  98.5-02?  The 12-valvers and the '03+ (?) merely stop running if
the fuel delivery system plugs up or dies.  Fix filter and/or lift pump
and you're on the road again.

Well I went and test drove a couple of dodge cummins today. First up 
was
a 05 1 ton dually, long bed, 4 door, 4 wheel drive , with leaver in 
the
floor for switching, with 6 speed manual.  I liked it for the fact 
that

it has the 6 speed, seems like it would get better mileage than the
autos.  It needs all new tires pretty soon, especially in the back and


It will get better mileage, and likely will last longer too.  But 6X
tire price is definitely worse than 4X.  Periodically.  I wouldn't want
a dualie unless I was towing/hauling heavy a lot, but I just hate
training wheels.  Lotsa guys strip off the fender skirts by accident,
since the truck is so much wider in back than in front.


probably alignment.  Rode like a 1 ton of course.  Shifted good.  Is a
BIG truck.  Seems like the rear end was howling.  Are they supposed to
howl on these?  Price as 23k had 101k miles.  Next truck was a 03 
2500,


They don't howl, something is wrong.  Also note that the dualie is 
likely
equipped with the 4.10:1 (?) rear end, and so will not get the good 
mileage
of the 3.73:1 (again, ?), but will be welcome if you exclusively tow 
heavy.

For nothing heavier than a car on a trailer I'd go with the taller rear
end, you'll get better mileage.  In the common-rail models, you can also
get a 1-ton single rear wheel model if that suits your needs better, but
for a car on a trailer I'd think a 3/4 ton would be adequate, and would
offer _slightly_ better unloaded comfort.

Highway miles tend to be gentle miles, the Cummins is as robust as
our beloved OM617, if not more so.  100 kmi is just broken in, I
wouldn't worry about it if the condition of the rest of the truck
looked good.  Thrash will out, so to speak.

-- Jim




Re: [MBZ] OT, cummins, experts chime in

2006-07-21 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
That 1 ton had a 3.73 or whatever rear end.  Forgot to check the other 
truck.  I would prefer a 3/4 ton for daily use, as the dually is pretty 
big, but would be nice if I did ever start hauling more than 1 car at 
once.  For now I just haul one at a time so Im sure 3/4 is the way to go.


Jim Cathey wrote:

Personally I'd go with the 05'.  But then again I guess I'd want more 
info
on the rear end...  I know I've heard the newer models (like since 98) 
you
have to be sure not to lose fuel pressure or they tend to take out the 
IP...



So far as I know, only the 24-valve non-common-rail engines have this
issue.  98.5-02?  The 12-valvers and the '03+ (?) merely stop running if
the fuel delivery system plugs up or dies.  Fix filter and/or lift pump
and you're on the road again.


Well I went and test drove a couple of dodge cummins today. First up 
was
a 05 1 ton dually, long bed, 4 door, 4 wheel drive , with leaver in 
the
floor for switching, with 6 speed manual.  I liked it for the fact 
that

it has the 6 speed, seems like it would get better mileage than the
autos.  It needs all new tires pretty soon, especially in the back and



It will get better mileage, and likely will last longer too.  But 6X
tire price is definitely worse than 4X.  Periodically.  I wouldn't want
a dualie unless I was towing/hauling heavy a lot, but I just hate
training wheels.  Lotsa guys strip off the fender skirts by accident,
since the truck is so much wider in back than in front.



probably alignment.  Rode like a 1 ton of course.  Shifted good.  Is a
BIG truck.  Seems like the rear end was howling.  Are they supposed to
howl on these?  Price as 23k had 101k miles.  Next truck was a 03 
2500,



They don't howl, something is wrong.  Also note that the dualie is 
likely
equipped with the 4.10:1 (?) rear end, and so will not get the good 
mileage
of the 3.73:1 (again, ?), but will be welcome if you exclusively tow 
heavy.

For nothing heavier than a car on a trailer I'd go with the taller rear
end, you'll get better mileage.  In the common-rail models, you can also
get a 1-ton single rear wheel model if that suits your needs better, but
for a car on a trailer I'd think a 3/4 ton would be adequate, and would
offer _slightly_ better unloaded comfort.

Highway miles tend to be gentle miles, the Cummins is as robust as
our beloved OM617, if not more so.  100 kmi is just broken in, I
wouldn't worry about it if the condition of the rest of the truck
looked good.  Thrash will out, so to speak.

-- Jim


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com





--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
 91 300D 2.5 Turbo, 90 420SEL, 89 560SEL, 87 420SEL, 87 300SDL,
 85 380SE, 85 300D, 84 190D 2.2, 83 300TD, 81 300TD, 81 240D,
 76 240D, 76 300D, 74 240D, 73 280SEL 4.5, 72 250C, 69 250
http://www.striplin.net



Re: [MBZ] OT, cummins, experts chime in

2006-07-21 Thread Mitch Haley
Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:
 
 That 1 ton had a 3.73 or whatever rear end.  Forgot to check the other
 truck.  I would prefer a 3/4 ton for daily use, as the dually is pretty
 big, but would be nice if I did ever start hauling more than 1 car at
 once.  For now I just haul one at a time so Im sure 3/4 is the way to go.
 

2 ton Ford, 1997, 160kmi, auto trans, 7.3 powerstroke, $2k. No bed,
but you could put rails on it and piggyback a car. Want it or not?
Mitch.



Re: [MBZ] OT, cummins, experts chime in

2006-07-21 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
I just dont get attatched to the frods, sorry.  Seems cheap though, 
where is it located?  I might be up for a beater truck


Mitch Haley wrote:


Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:


That 1 ton had a 3.73 or whatever rear end.  Forgot to check the other
truck.  I would prefer a 3/4 ton for daily use, as the dually is pretty
big, but would be nice if I did ever start hauling more than 1 car at
once.  For now I just haul one at a time so Im sure 3/4 is the way to go.




2 ton Ford, 1997, 160kmi, auto trans, 7.3 powerstroke, $2k. No bed,
but you could put rails on it and piggyback a car. Want it or not?
Mitch.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com





--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
 91 300D 2.5 Turbo, 90 420SEL, 89 560SEL, 87 420SEL, 87 300SDL,
 85 380SE, 85 300D, 84 190D 2.2, 83 300TD, 81 300TD, 81 240D,
 76 240D, 76 300D, 74 240D, 73 280SEL 4.5, 72 250C, 69 250
http://www.striplin.net



Re: [MBZ] OT, cummins, experts chime in

2006-07-21 Thread Mitch Haley
Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:
 
 I just dont get attatched to the frods, sorry.  Seems cheap though,
 where is it located?  I might be up for a beater truck

Michigan. It's well maintained, was in service as an ambulance
at a local hospital a month ago. There's a big hole in the back
where the ambulance body used to be and a small hole in each fender
where the lights were. 14k GVWR, it's an Econoline so the engine
bay is cramped, but the cargo area to length ratio is better than
with an F450.



Re: [MBZ] OT, cummins, experts chime in

2006-07-21 Thread Fmiser
rumor has it that Levi wrote:

 Hey Mike, you ought to throw one of THOSE in your M37!

We already discussed this. *smile*

A BT4 is a 4-cyl, where the BT6 is the 6-cyl that's in the big Dodge
pickups. (but I don't think they call it a BT6 anymore, do they?

-- Philip, still dreaming of a BT4 in a M37 or a SIII LandRover.



Re: [MBZ] OT, cummins, experts chime in

2006-07-21 Thread James Jetton
Kaleb,
Will the dealership cover the rear end or will they offer a warranty?  I've 
heard of the 6 speed Cummins getting 22-24 mpg, but of course that's under 65 
mph.  I just towed a 6k pound camper back from Florida with the Powerstroke.  
At 65 - 70 mph I averaged 14 mpg. Felt like it wasn't even behind me.  I like 
my Ford, and on the trip to and from Fla, I saw more Ford diesels by far than 
any other brand.  It was rare that a 3/4 or 1 ton truck wasn't diesel.
One of my mechanics at work has a 2004 2500 Duramax with the Allison tranny.  
He tows a 10k pound 5th wheel and swears by the Allison, he bought it used with 
the remaining factory warranty to 100k miles, it had 33k on it and he paid 
around 30k. (Ouch)

James Jetton
1987 300 SDL 144k
1996 Ford F-250 Powerstroke 176k
1968 Silver Streak Atlas Deluxe 28'

Kaleb said:
Well I went and test drove a couple of dodge cummins today. First up was 
a 05 1 ton dually, long bed, 4 door, 4 wheel drive , with leaver in the 
floor for switching, with 6 speed manual. I liked it for the fact that 
it has the 6 speed, seems like it would get better mileage than the 
autos. It needs all new tires pretty soon, especially in the back and 
probably alignment. Rode like a 1 ton of course. Shifted good. Is a 
BIG truck. Seems like the rear end was howling. Are they supposed to 
howl on these? Price as 23k had 101k miles. Next truck was a 03 2500, 
short bed, electronic 4 wheel drive, automatic, 4 door. It had leather, 
rode smoother, didnt pull to one side. Price on it was 21.5k. I can 
say I REALLY love that cummins motor after driving one of them. What do 
you cummins ownere thing about this? Good prices? Keep looking? What 
kind of mileage will that 1 ton get with the 6 speed? Will it be worse 
than the other truck with automatic 3/4 ton? The thing that had me 
worried was the rear end howling on the other 1 ton truck.
-- 
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
91 300D 2.5 Turbo, 90 420SEL, 89 560SEL, 87 420SEL, 87 300SDL,
85 380SE, 85 300D, 84 190D 2.2, 83 300TD, 81 300TD, 81 240D,
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 21 01:36:54 2006
Received: from pop-canoe.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([207.69.195.66])
by server8.arterytc8.net with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G3jwk-p9-Rm
for mercedes@okiebenz.com; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:36:54 +
Received: from dialup-4.224.180.217.dial1.cincinnati1.level3.net
([4.224.180.217])
by pop-canoe.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #10)
id 1G3jwb-0001Em-00
for mercedes@okiebenz.com; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:36:45 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622)
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Peter Frederick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:32:23 -0500
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622)
X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Priming the Oil System
X-BeenThere: mercedes@okiebenz.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7.cp2
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
List-Id: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes_okiebenz.com.okiebenz.com
List-Unsubscribe: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com, 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Archive: /pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com
List-Post: mailto:mercedes@okiebenz.com
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com, 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:36:55 -

Never hurts to pre-oil, though -- we do it all the time.  We had a 
spare oil pump drive gear from a 617 (broken crank) we ground the teeth 
off of to pre-oil my brother's when we put it together a few years 
back.  Makes the oil pressure pop right up while cranking, and lets you 
know there aren't any galley plugs missing or cam towers exchanged 
right to left (on the V8s, this causes a no oil pressure problem -- the 
feed bore is uncovered).

Belts and braces, perhaps, but better than cranking on dry bearings.  
Synthetic oil or the thicker assembly lube will do the same thing, but 
why take a chance?

My German friend always pre-oiled through the oil pressure sender 
fitting as he had a separate oiling pump.  Standard practice where he 
was taught.

Peter




Re: [MBZ] OT, cummins, experts chime in

2006-07-21 Thread Jim Cathey

A BT4 is a 4-cyl, where the BT6 is the 6-cyl that's in the big Dodge
pickups. (but I don't think they call it a BT6 anymore, do they?


6BTA.  6-cylinder B engine, Turbocharged, aftercooled.)

-- Jim




Re: [MBZ] OT, cummins, experts chime in

2006-07-21 Thread kevin kraly

Philip, still dreaming of a BT4 in a M37 or a SIII LandRover.

I spotted a 1988 Bronco on Craigslist here in PDX with a Cummins 4BT engine, 
believe it was listed at $6K.  That would be a fun off-road machine to have.


Kevin in Hillsboro Oregon

1981 300CD 204K miles, Giesela AKA Granny 





Re: [MBZ] OT, cummins, experts chime in

2006-07-21 Thread kevin kraly
My '06 Ram 2500 Cummins Diesel automatic is a fine truck.  The '03 6speed 
was too although the auto does make it easier to drive (for those with bad 
knees).  The tranny seems to find whatever gear is needed, and it just keeps 
on pullin'!  The 04 was the first year of the 325HP 610LB/FT torque engine 
although the '03 HO engine did very well for me also with 305HP and 550 
LB/FT of torque getting 20MPG average.  The new one won't be getting those 
kinds of numbers yet since it only has 1K miles on it now.


Kevin in Hillsboro Oregon
1981 300CD 204K miles, Giesela AKA Granny 





Re: [MBZ] OT, cummins, experts chime in

2006-07-21 Thread Robert Tara Ludwick
I'd price around to see what a rear end shop would charge to do a 
complete rebuild on the rear end, and work them down that plus some for 
aggravation, and then if you need to you could just pickup a whole axel 
from a boneyard and swap it out yourself and come out ahead..


-Robert

Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:
Well I went and test drove a couple of dodge cummins today. First up was 
a 05 1 ton dually, long bed, 4 door, 4 wheel drive , with leaver in the 
floor for switching, with 6 speed manual.  I liked it for the fact that 
it has the 6 speed, seems like it would get better mileage than the 
autos.  It needs all new tires pretty soon, especially in the back and 
probably alignment.  Rode like a 1 ton of course.  Shifted good.  Is a 
BIG truck.  Seems like the rear end was howling.  Are they supposed to 
howl on these?  Price as 23k had 101k miles.  Next truck was a 03 2500, 
short bed, electronic 4 wheel drive, automatic, 4 door.  It had leather, 
rode smoother, didnt pull to one side.  Price on it was 21.5k.  I can 
say I REALLY love that cummins motor after driving one of them.  What do 
you cummins ownere thing about this?  Good prices?  Keep looking?  What 
kind of mileage will that 1 ton get with the 6 speed?  Will it be worse 
than the other truck with automatic 3/4 ton?  The thing that had me 
worried was the rear end howling on the other 1 ton truck.
  





Re: [MBZ] OT, cummins, experts chime in

2006-07-20 Thread Donald Snook
Kaleb wrote: 

 

The thing that had me 

worried was the rear end howling on the other 1 ton truck.

 

I am not an expert on these trucks, I don't know enough to be a novice,
but one thing you said struck me. 

 

Didn't you say it needed tires?  How do you know the howl is not tire
noise. I had a howl from my old Chevy 4X4 and it ended up being the
tires.  

 

23K for a truck with 101K miles?  I don't know how much these trucks
are, but that sounds like a lot of dough for that many miles.  I guess a
lot of it must have been highway miles to put 100,000 miles on it in two
years. 

 

 

Donald H. Snook

McDonald, Tinker, Skaer, Quinn  Herrington, P.A. 

300 West Douglas

P.O. Box 207

Wichita, Kansas 67201 0207

Tel. (316) 263-5851

This confidential message may be subject to the attorney-client
privilege or protected by the attorney work-product doctrine. If you
have received this message in error, please delete it and notify me.  

 



Re: [MBZ] OT, cummins, experts chime in

2006-07-20 Thread Levi Smith

Personally I'd go with the 05'.  But then again I guess I'd want more info
on the rear end...  I know I've heard the newer models (like since 98) you
have to be sure not to lose fuel pressure or they tend to take out the IP...

I know what you mean about enjoying them...  My dad's got a 97 or 98 Cummins
Dually with a flat bed/side racks with dump.  That thing just hauls.  You
throw a trailer that weighs a couple tons on there and a tractor that weighs
another 3-5 ton or so on there and it barely cares
As compared to his 05' 1500 with the 4.7l engine in it that won't hold 70mph
in 5th gear going up a hill by itself.  It's not a dog, 5th is a pretty high
gear.  But you throw JUST that trailer on the back and you can practically
forget doing much in 5th unless there's absolutely no incline and no need to
accelerate.

That Cummins torque is addicting...  Now if only I could get one in my Benz
or something the size of a Dakota...  (:
Hey Mike, you ought to throw one of THOSE in your M37!

Oh yeah my uncle (also named Mike) has like a 95 2500 Cummins chassis that
he put on one of those like late 60's sweptline Dodge bodies on.  Looks
pretty cool.  Apparently his has been upgraded though as his has a lot more
top end pull to it.

Sorry I'm not more help there Kaleb, but the mention of those Cummins really
gets the AR AR (grunt grunt as Tim Allen would do) flowing!  (:

Levi

On 7/20/06, Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Well I went and test drove a couple of dodge cummins today. First up was
a 05 1 ton dually, long bed, 4 door, 4 wheel drive , with leaver in the
floor for switching, with 6 speed manual.  I liked it for the fact that
it has the 6 speed, seems like it would get better mileage than the
autos.  It needs all new tires pretty soon, especially in the back and
probably alignment.  Rode like a 1 ton of course.  Shifted good.  Is a
BIG truck.  Seems like the rear end was howling.  Are they supposed to
howl on these?  Price as 23k had 101k miles.  Next truck was a 03 2500,
short bed, electronic 4 wheel drive, automatic, 4 door.  It had leather,
rode smoother, didnt pull to one side.  Price on it was 21.5k.  I can
say I REALLY love that cummins motor after driving one of them.  What do
you cummins ownere thing about this?  Good prices?  Keep looking?  What
kind of mileage will that 1 ton get with the 6 speed?  Will it be worse
than the other truck with automatic 3/4 ton?  The thing that had me
worried was the rear end howling on the other 1 ton truck.
--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
  91 300D 2.5 Turbo, 90 420SEL, 89 560SEL, 87 420SEL, 87 300SDL,
  85 380SE, 85 300D, 84 190D 2.2, 83 300TD, 81 300TD, 81 240D,
  76 240D, 76 300D, 74 240D, 73 280SEL 4.5, 72 250C, 69 250
http://www.striplin.net

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT, cummins, experts chime in

2006-07-20 Thread David Brodbeck
Donald Snook wrote:
 Didn't you say it needed tires?  How do you know the howl is not tire
 noise. I had a howl from my old Chevy 4X4 and it ended up being the
 tires.  
   

That's the annoying thing.  It can go either way.  I had a noise on an
E150 once that I swore was tire noise.  It sounded exactly like tire
whine, and didn't change with throttle position, only with speed.  It
turned out to be the bearings in the rear end.

If I were the one shopping for a truck, I'd use the noise to bargain the
price down.  Then I'd change the tires, and if the noise stayed, I'd
start shopping for a junkyard rear axle.  They go bad so rarely on most
vehicles that the odds of finding a good one seem pretty good.