Re: [MBZ] Sulfur good?
good...I'll send a bill for all the ramdom costs of things I've had to repair over the years do to the lost lubricity from have low sulfer diesel. Bob R On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: From this week's Redmond Report: QUOTE* http://www.1105newsletters.com/t.do?id=4012939:1060387Ex-Microsoft CTO vs. Global Warming Nathan Myhrvold is a major-league brain. Decades ago, Microsoft bought Myhrvold's company Dynamical Systems not just for its multitasking technology, but more for the pure brainpower of Nathan and his brother Cameron. Nathan eventually founded Microsoft Research, became chief technology officer at Microsoft, and then left Microsoft a decade ago to pursue private hobbies and investments. All this is to give credibility to Myhrvold's http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2511875/nathan_myhrvolds_anti_global_warming.html?cat=15idea to fight global warming. Under the plan, balloons will lift into the stratosphere a huge hose through which sulfur is pumped -- sulfur that blocks the sun and lowers temperatures. And you could pump more or less sulfur depending on temperature trends. Unlike the trillions involved in worldwide cooling efforts, Myhvrold's scheme only costs a quarter of a billion dollars. Bill Gates could probably nab that with a few swipes of his ATM card. END QUOTE* The EPA and greenies have painted sulfur as evil, and justification for removing all Diesels form the world. Now we have a greenie saying that only sulfur can save us. In agriculture, the removal of SOx from smokestacks and exhaust pipes has presented a new problem. Where in the past, N, P and K were the components of fertilizer, now fields are for the first time ever showing a shortage of sulfur. New fertilizer blends will show N, P, K, and S. This is to replace the sulfur that used to settle out from the air. I say thumb your no se at the gummit and their greenies and keep on driving old Diesels. With most of the country freezing their a** off right now, isn't it time to kill albore's global warming BS once and for all? Hoisting a hose to spew sulfur in the air! What a dork! ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] Sulfur good?
The AlGore crowd were very deceptive in their global warming media blitz. It's one of those crisis created to generate fear and dependence on the govt. The thing with a crisis is it cries for a immediate response. No time for debate (that might let the truth come out), only reaction is a must act *right* now to stop it - just let the govt spend more money - no debate, just send money. 10 years ago Ted Danson was saying we only have 10 years to save the oceans. Bt... wrong. Last I looked they're still there and have changed little if at all. The GW alarmist used small pieces of graphs to show what they call a increase in temp, when in reality when the whole graph is shown, the whole picture become clear - we're in a cooler than typical situation and the temp is approaching normal. Actually using normal when talking about temperature is unfair as there is no such thing. If we hadn't had global warming over the last 40,000 years there's still be glaciers in Kansas. The temp of the earth is constantly changing. The argument is whether people cause it. As far as the CO2 - there was a spike in CO2 during the 1st quarter of the 20th century - yet that's before the period of massive growth in industrialized countries.Ever seen A Gore debate his position? Nope, and you never will - he knows it's a house of cards that's indefensible. Besides, we have real crisis' to fight. But, to keep more off topic stuff out, I'll stop now. LarryT OilAnalysis Time? Looking for Weber Parts or Porsche Posters? www.youroil.net -- From: Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2010 10:48 AM To: mercedes@okiebenz.com Subject: [MBZ] Sulfur good? From this week's Redmond Report: QUOTE* http://www.1105newsletters.com/t.do?id=4012939:1060387Ex-Microsoft CTO vs. Global Warming Nathan Myhrvold is a major-league brain. Decades ago, Microsoft bought Myhrvold's company Dynamical Systems not just for its multitasking technology, but more for the pure brainpower of Nathan and his brother Cameron. Nathan eventually founded Microsoft Research, became chief technology officer at Microsoft, and then left Microsoft a decade ago to pursue private hobbies and investments. All this is to give credibility to Myhrvold's http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2511875/nathan_myhrvolds_anti_global_warming.html?cat=15idea to fight global warming. Under the plan, balloons will lift into the stratosphere a huge hose through which sulfur is pumped -- sulfur that blocks the sun and lowers temperatures. And you could pump more or less sulfur depending on temperature trends. Unlike the trillions involved in worldwide cooling efforts, Myhvrold's scheme only costs a quarter of a billion dollars. Bill Gates could probably nab that with a few swipes of his ATM card. END QUOTE* The EPA and greenies have painted sulfur as evil, and justification for removing all Diesels form the world. Now we have a greenie saying that only sulfur can save us. In agriculture, the removal of SOx from smokestacks and exhaust pipes has presented a new problem. Where in the past, N, P and K were the components of fertilizer, now fields are for the first time ever showing a shortage of sulfur. New fertilizer blends will show N, P, K, and S. This is to replace the sulfur that used to settle out from the air. I say thumb your no se at the gummit and their greenies and keep on driving old Diesels. With most of the country freezing their a** off right now, isn't it time to kill albore's global warming BS once and for all? Hoisting a hose to spew sulfur in the air! What a dork! ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] Sulfur good?
Actually, most of the northern hemisphere is now freezing their butt off. -Original Message- From: mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of Dieselhead Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2010 10:49 To: mercedes@okiebenz.com Subject: [MBZ] Sulfur good? From this week's Redmond Report: QUOTE* http://www.1105newsletters.com/t.do?id=4012939:1060387Ex-Microsoft CTO vs. Global Warming Nathan Myhrvold is a major-league brain. Decades ago, Microsoft bought Myhrvold's company Dynamical Systems not just for its multitasking technology, but more for the pure brainpower of Nathan and his brother Cameron. Nathan eventually founded Microsoft Research, became chief technology officer at Microsoft, and then left Microsoft a decade ago to pursue private hobbies and investments. All this is to give credibility to Myhrvold's http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2511875/nathan_myhrvolds_anti_glob al_warming.html?cat=15idea to fight global warming. Under the plan, balloons will lift into the stratosphere a huge hose through which sulfur is pumped -- sulfur that blocks the sun and lowers temperatures. And you could pump more or less sulfur depending on temperature trends. Unlike the trillions involved in worldwide cooling efforts, Myhvrold's scheme only costs a quarter of a billion dollars. Bill Gates could probably nab that with a few swipes of his ATM card. END QUOTE* The EPA and greenies have painted sulfur as evil, and justification for removing all Diesels form the world. Now we have a greenie saying that only sulfur can save us. In agriculture, the removal of SOx from smokestacks and exhaust pipes has presented a new problem. Where in the past, N, P and K were the components of fertilizer, now fields are for the first time ever showing a shortage of sulfur. New fertilizer blends will show N, P, K, and S. This is to replace the sulfur that used to settle out from the air. I say thumb your no se at the gummit and their greenies and keep on driving old Diesels. With most of the country freezing their a** off right now, isn't it time to kill albore's global warming BS once and for all? Hoisting a hose to spew sulfur in the air! What a dork! ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] Sulfur good?
Here's what the Founder of the Weather Channel has to say about the AlBore The Sky is Falling Crowd. http://www.kusi.com/home/78477082.html?video=popt=a http://www.kusi.com/home/78477082.html?video=popt=a LarryT wrote: The AlGore crowd were very deceptive in their global warming media blitz. It's one of those crisis created to generate fear and dependence on the govt. The thing with a crisis is it cries for a immediate response. No time for debate (that might let the truth come out), only reaction is a must act *right* now to stop it - just let the govt spend more money - no debate, just send money. 10 years ago Ted Danson was saying we only have 10 years to save the oceans. Bt... wrong. Last I looked they're still there and have changed little if at all. The GW alarmist used small pieces of graphs to show what they call a increase in temp, when in reality when the whole graph is shown, the whole picture become clear - we're in a cooler than typical situation and the temp is approaching normal. Actually using normal when talking about temperature is unfair as there is no such thing. If we hadn't had global warming over the last 40,000 years there's still be glaciers in Kansas. The temp of the earth is constantly changing. The argument is whether people cause it. As far as the CO2 - there was a spike in CO2 during the 1st quarter of the 20th century - yet that's before the period of massive growth in industrialized countries.Ever seen A Gore debate his position? Nope, and you never will - he knows it's a house of cards that's indefensible. Besides, we have real crisis' to fight. But, to keep more off topic stuff out, I'll stop now. LarryT OilAnalysis Time? Looking for Weber Parts or Porsche Posters? www.youroil.net -- From: Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2010 10:48 AM To: mercedes@okiebenz.com Subject: [MBZ] Sulfur good? From this week's Redmond Report: QUOTE* http://www.1105newsletters.com/t.do?id=4012939:1060387Ex-Microsoft CTO vs. Global Warming Nathan Myhrvold is a major-league brain. Decades ago, Microsoft bought Myhrvold's company Dynamical Systems not just for its multitasking technology, but more for the pure brainpower of Nathan and his brother Cameron. Nathan eventually founded Microsoft Research, became chief technology officer at Microsoft, and then left Microsoft a decade ago to pursue private hobbies and investments. All this is to give credibility to Myhrvold's http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2511875/nathan_myhrvolds_anti_global_warming.html?cat=15idea to fight global warming. Under the plan, balloons will lift into the stratosphere a huge hose through which sulfur is pumped -- sulfur that blocks the sun and lowers temperatures. And you could pump more or less sulfur depending on temperature trends. Unlike the trillions involved in worldwide cooling efforts, Myhvrold's scheme only costs a quarter of a billion dollars. Bill Gates could probably nab that with a few swipes of his ATM card. END QUOTE* The EPA and greenies have painted sulfur as evil, and justification for removing all Diesels form the world. Now we have a greenie saying that only sulfur can save us. In agriculture, the removal of SOx from smokestacks and exhaust pipes has presented a new problem. Where in the past, N, P and K were the components of fertilizer, now fields are for the first time ever showing a shortage of sulfur. New fertilizer blends will show N, P, K, and S. This is to replace the sulfur that used to settle out from the air. I say thumb your no se at the gummit and their greenies and keep on driving old Diesels. With most of the country freezing their a** off right now, isn't it time to kill albore's global warming BS once and for all? Hoisting a hose to spew sulfur in the air! What a dork! ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] Sulfur good?
LarryT wrote: The AlGore crowd were very deceptive in their global warming media blitz. It's one of those crisis created to generate fear and dependence on the govt. I think media blitz can be defined as deception. Is there anything that anyone can remember that was media blitz that was anything other than deception? Media is s dead. The other reality is that media blitz has only one solution - government programs. Whereas, if there was some reality and truth in the presentations of media, plus some liberty to pursue objectives outside the interference of monopoly government programs, we might see some local innovation and ingenuity. Then we could purpose to congregate at different places to participate in different solutions. Whereas today, solutions are monopolized and there is a monoculture of answers. Same answer in ME as in IL as in AK. Whereas, if you allow some local ingenuity to be realized by forcing out the monopoly (power company), we might begin to see local injection of real solutions that are shown for what they are - they work, or they don't work. Today, the only things that work are the things the monopoly wants to show you. Where's nikola tesla? The GW thing - I probably don't buy the argument, but I don't pay too much attention to either side. What I appreciated about the algore movie inconvenient truth is that I came away with an objective to consume less of everything. I can do that. It is my local decision without media blitz and without government quota forcing me to participate. mao ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
