Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ac: rename SI-CIK-VI to GFX6-GFX7-GFX8
We already use GFX9 and I don't want us to have confusing naming in the driver. GFXn naming is better from the driver perspective, because it's the real version of the gfx portion of the hw. Also, CIK means Bonaire-Kaveri-Kabini, it doesn't mean CI. It shouldn't confuse our SDMA, UVD, VCE etc. code much. Those have nothing to do with GFXn and they have their own version numbers. Marek On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 3:26 AM Dave Airlie wrote: > > From: Marek Olšák > > It would be nice to have a reasoning why, I assume that is what they > are called internally and in the kernel, but it would be good to > mention something to justify it in the commit msg. > > Acked-by: Dave Airlie > ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ac: rename SI-CIK-VI to GFX6-GFX7-GFX8
On 5/15/19 9:26 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: From: Marek Olšák It would be nice to have a reasoning why, I assume that is what they are called internally and in the kernel, but it would be good to mention something to justify it in the commit msg. Probably because Navi will be GFX10? :-) Acked-by: Dave Airlie ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ac: rename SI-CIK-VI to GFX6-GFX7-GFX8
> From: Marek Olšák It would be nice to have a reasoning why, I assume that is what they are called internally and in the kernel, but it would be good to mention something to justify it in the commit msg. Acked-by: Dave Airlie ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
