RE: Rev licensing 2.5

[MidiToolz]

 Also, even though you may be using the MC IDE, you are still using the
Revolution engine and need to meet the licensing requirements.

I am glad you specified the Revolution engine in this claim...this would
not apply to licenses purchased from Scott Raney prior to the RunRev buyout.


This licensing situation is getting a little too hostile for me. I am
developing an alternative solution in Java, so I have moved on. I still use
the 2.5 engine I licensed in 2002 from Scott Raney when I need to...but this
environment has lost sight of the original 'spirit' that he intended (in my
opinion).

JR



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. Landman Gay
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 7:39 PM
Cc: Discussions on Metacard
Subject: Re: Rev licensing


Also, even though you may be using the MC IDE, you are still using the 
Revolution engine and need to meet the licensing requirements.

-- 
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard

___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard

Re: Rev licensing 2.5

[Richard Gaskin]

MidiToolz wrote:

This licensing situation is getting a little too hostile for me. I am
developing an alternative solution in Java, so I have moved on. I still use
the 2.5 engine I licensed in 2002 from Scott Raney when I need to..


Interesting that you mentioned Java. I've been giving it a fresh look 
for a couple projects I have coming up.  If you can discuss your Java 
toolkit freely please write me offlist.  I'd love to see good Java 
solutions for the xTalk-minded programmer


--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.FourthWorld.com
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard