> Also, even though you may be using the MC IDE, you are still using the Revolution engine and need to meet the licensing requirements.
I am glad you specified the "Revolution" engine in this claim...this would not apply to licenses purchased from Scott Raney prior to the RunRev buyout. This licensing situation is getting a little too hostile for me. I am developing an alternative solution in Java, so I have moved on. I still use the 2.5 engine I licensed in 2002 from Scott Raney when I need to...but this environment has lost sight of the original 'spirit' that he intended (in my opinion). JR -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. Landman Gay Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 7:39 PM Cc: Discussions on Metacard Subject: Re: Rev licensing Also, even though you may be using the MC IDE, you are still using the Revolution engine and need to meet the licensing requirements. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED] HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list metacard@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list metacard@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
