[meteorite-list] $1 Million "Dream" Meteorite Collection

2010-04-13 Thread Shawn Alan
Hello Listers,

If I had a $1 million to spend on some meteorites, it would have to be these 5.

1 Almahata Sitta
2 Pribram
3 Ensisheim
4 Chassigny
5 Weston 

Shawn Alan
eBaystore
http://shop.ebay.com/photophlow/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_from=&_ipg=&_trksid=p4340



[meteorite-list] $1 Million "Dream" Meteorite Collection
Meteorites USA eric at meteoritesusa.com 
Wed Apr 14 00:12:47 EDT 2010 

Previous message: [meteorite-list] The Moon - One Titanic Tektite? 
Next message: [meteorite-list] $1 Million "Dream" Meteorite Collection 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 


Hi listees and meteorite addicts, 

A $1 Million Dollar challenge. 

Scenario: You're a wealthy collector and have an "extra" $1 Million to 
spend on your meteorite collection. 

What do you buy? 

Have fun... 

Regards, 
Eric Wichman 
Meteorites USA 




Previous message: [meteorite-list] The Moon - One Titanic Tektite? 
Next message: [meteorite-list] $1 Million "Dream" Meteorite Collection 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 


More information about the Meteorite-list mailing list

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] $1 Million "Dream" Meteorite Collection

2010-04-13 Thread Richard Kowalski
Nice big slice of NWA 5000 for me...


--
Richard Kowalski
Full Moon Photography
IMCA #1081


--- On Tue, 4/13/10, Meteorites USA  wrote:

> From: Meteorites USA 
> Subject: [meteorite-list] $1 Million "Dream" Meteorite Collection
> To: "Meteorite-list" 
> Date: Tuesday, April 13, 2010, 9:12 PM
> Hi listees and meteorite addicts,
> 
> A $1 Million Dollar challenge.
> 
> Scenario: You're a wealthy collector and have an "extra" $1
> Million to spend on your meteorite collection.
> 
> What do you buy?
> 
> Have fun...
> 
> Regards,
> Eric Wichman
> Meteorites USA
> __
> Visit the Archives at 
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> 


  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Looking for a MAPS article

2010-04-13 Thread Rob Wesel
If anyone has a digital copy of this article or a spare paper copy I would 
be in your debt


The Benguerir meteorite: Report and description of a new Moroccan fall
Authors: Chennaoui Aoudjehane, Hasnaa; Jambon, Albert; Bourot Denise, 
Michèle; Rochette, Pierre
Source: Meteoritics & Planetary Science, Volume 41, Supplement 1, Pages 
5-246 (August 2006) , pp. 231-237



Rob Wesel
www.nakhladogmeteorites.com
www.facebook.com/nakhladog
--
We are the music makers...
and we are the dreamers of the dreams.
Willy Wonka, 1971


__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD - Campo del Cielo

2010-04-13 Thread Keith and Dana Jenkerson
Hello;

I am trying to help a lady who had gotten our number and called us
about three Campo meteorites that she has. We have not seen these
meteorites, but she does have pictures available of them and is
needing to sell them. Here is her information:

Debra Poncin
debilee...@gmail.com
760-500-1966

She seems like a really nice lady who is struggling like the rest of
us, so if anyone is interested, just contact her directly.

Thanks
Dana


KD Meteorites
kdmeteorites.com
admiremeteorites.com
Keith and Dana Jenkerson
4596 N. Vickie Lane
Kingman, AZ., 86409
928-399-0140
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] $1 Million "Dream" Meteorite Collection

2010-04-13 Thread Darren Garrison
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:12:47 -0700, you wrote:

>Scenario: You're a wealthy collector and have an "extra" $1 Million to 
>spend on your meteorite collection.
>
>What do you buy?

I try to get my hands on that giant lunar slice in the steampunk porthole that
the Hupes had made.
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] $1 Million "Dream" Meteorite Collection

2010-04-13 Thread star_wars_collector
I would only want a sample of a certain ALH martian that I heard something 
about some time ago on TV by some guy named Bill.


Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®

-Original Message-
From: Meteorites USA 
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:12:47 
To: Meteorite-list
Subject: [meteorite-list] $1 Million "Dream" Meteorite Collection

Hi listees and meteorite addicts,

A $1 Million Dollar challenge.

Scenario: You're a wealthy collector and have an "extra" $1 Million to 
spend on your meteorite collection.

What do you buy?

Have fun...

Regards,
Eric Wichman
Meteorites USA
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] The Moon - One Titanic Tektite?

2010-04-13 Thread Sterling K. Webb

A tektite is GLASS, not rock.

The Moon is ROCK, not glass.

I just ruined my reputation for writing long-
winded posts. Oh, wait, I don't want to do that.

Glass is molten (or vaporized) rock that cools
too quickly to reform in a crystal mineral
structure. Glass has been classified as an
amorphous liquid by most. Since a relatively
rapid cooling is required to make a glass, there
is an upper limit to the size of a melt. A large
body, astronomically large, could never cool
that quickly. You could get a very odd rock
body with a glass crust, quite unlike the Moon.

Actual tektites have extremely high silica
(silicon dioxide) content; the Moon does not
(by comparison to tektites). The elemental
bulk compositions of the Moon and of
tektites is quite different.

The elemental bulk compositions of tektites
vaguely matches a few terrestrial soils if you
allow for a lot of differential loss by volatilization
of some of the elements. Turning a rock or soil
or sand into a glass effectively erases a great
deal of information about the source material,
which is why people have been arguing about
tektites for 220 years and it shows little sign of
stopping.

And my last argument: if the Moon was a tektite,
it would be for sale on eBay, probably for its
"mystic" properties.


Sterling K. Webb

- Original Message - 
From: "Galactic Stone & Ironworks" 

To: "Meteorite List" 
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 10:14 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] The Moon - One Titanic Tektite?



Hi Listees,

I don't know if this thought has ever come up before in this way, 
but


Isn't the moon, by definition, one gigantic tektite since it was
spalled off from the Earth during a catastrophic meteorite impact?

If so, then every lunar meteorite is also a tektite.of sorts.

Best regards,

MikeG


--

Mike Gilmer - Galactic Stone & Ironworks Meteorites
http://www.galactic-stone.com
http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone

__
Visit the Archives at 
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html

Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 


__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] $1 Million "Dream" Meteorite Collection

2010-04-13 Thread Meteorites USA

Hi listees and meteorite addicts,

A $1 Million Dollar challenge.

Scenario: You're a wealthy collector and have an "extra" $1 Million to 
spend on your meteorite collection.


What do you buy?

Have fun...

Regards,
Eric Wichman
Meteorites USA
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] The Moon - One Titanic Tektite?

2010-04-13 Thread Aubrey Whymark
Mike and list

An interesting thought, but the moon is not made of glass so it would have to 
be one giant impact spherule!

Also it hasn't landed back on Earth yet! It can't be an -ite. It was pointed 
out to me that you have Meteorites and Meteors. But in the tektite world we 
only have Tektites, no Tekteors - just as well we haven't witnessed any genuine 
tektite falls (don't believe everything you read) or we wouldn't know what to 
call the falling body!

Aubrey
www.tektites.co.uk



--- On Wed, 14/4/10, Galactic Stone & Ironworks  wrote:

> From: Galactic Stone & Ironworks 
> Subject: [meteorite-list] The Moon - One Titanic Tektite?
> To: "Meteorite List" 
> Date: Wednesday, 14 April, 2010, 4:14
> Hi Listees,
> 
> I don't know if this thought has ever come up before in
> this way, but
> 
> Isn't the moon, by definition, one gigantic tektite since
> it was
> spalled off from the Earth during a catastrophic meteorite
> impact?
> 
> If so, then every lunar meteorite is also a tektite.of
> sorts.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> MikeG
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Mike Gilmer - Galactic Stone & Ironworks Meteorites
> http://www.galactic-stone.com
> http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
> 
> __
> Visit the Archives at 
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> 


  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] The Moon - One Titanic Tektite?

2010-04-13 Thread Galactic Stone & Ironworks
Hi Listees,

I don't know if this thought has ever come up before in this way, but

Isn't the moon, by definition, one gigantic tektite since it was
spalled off from the Earth during a catastrophic meteorite impact?

If so, then every lunar meteorite is also a tektite.of sorts.

Best regards,

MikeG


-- 

Mike Gilmer - Galactic Stone & Ironworks Meteorites
http://www.galactic-stone.com
http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD- super oriented Sikhote Alins and beautifully crusted Millbillillie, Shallowater, Fisher

2010-04-13 Thread mail
Greetings
My site is updated with some incredibly oriented Sikhote-Alin specimens. Be 
sure to check out the 11.2 gram "Mop Top" piece (now owned by M. Blood).  

How about a super nice 150 gram complete Millbillillie, with glossy black 
fusion crust and neat shape.

1.5 gram fragment of Fisher, Minnesota and a 0.85 gram thin slice of 
Shallowater, an aubrite from Texas!

Web address:
http://www.mhmeteorites.com

And

Wire Saw slicing available from http://www.kerfindustries.com

Matt

Matt Morgan
Mile High Meteorites
http://www.mhmeteorites.com
P.O. Box 151293
Lakewood, CO 80215
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Blaine Reed

2010-04-13 Thread Impactika
Hello everybody,

And mostly, those of you who have been trying to get hold of Blaine,

Blaine's mother died last night after a long battle with cancer.
Blaine had been driving back and forth over the mountains from Delta to 
Denver every few days. Now he will be busy a while longer with funeral 
arrangements and family matters, so he has asked me to tell you all to please 
be 
patient, he will get back to work soon, and answer your messages. But it might 
be a while, at least a week or so.
 
Thank you for your patience.

And I already told him that the Meteorite Community sympathizes, and I 
expressed all our condoleances.

Anne M. Black
http://www.impactika.com/
impact...@aol.com
Vice-President, I.M.C.A. Inc.
http://www.imca.cc/
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'

2010-04-13 Thread Greg Stanley

Yes - and we could make very large impenetrable meteor "Nets," to catch the 
meteors before they touch the ground.

Greg S.


> From: meteorh...@aol.com
> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:38:59 -0400
> To: veom...@gmail.com; meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not 
> meteorite'
>
> In a message dated 4/13/2010 4:29:53 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> veom...@gmail.com writes:
> "Then, on the bounce, it touches the Earth and becomes the Property of
> The State."
>
> So if a meteoroid embeds itself into your car, or you catch it before
> it hits the ground (ya, improbable as it seems), or if bounces off a
> cow and you catch it, does it belong to you now since it did not
> become a meteorite?
>
> - YvW
> ***
>
> Veomega,
>
> As I understand, the St. Louis meteorite hit a car and stayed in it while
> it was being driven down a city street. On an aside, I don't think the
> City of St. Louis asserted any claim that it was their property.
>
> Steve Arnold
> of Meteorite Men
>
> __
> Visit the Archives at 
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  
_
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your 
inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'

2010-04-13 Thread GREG LINDH

 
  Stering,
 
  You wrote:
 
  "In this reality, the State is usually successful in asserting whatever  they 
wish to assert."
 
  Yup, that's pretty much the way it is, Sterling.
 
 
  Greg
 
 
 

> From: sterling_k_w...@sbcglobal.net
> To: veom...@gmail.com; meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:26:46 -0500
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not 
> meteorite'
> 
> Well, if The State had used the "touched the
> Earth" argument to weasel out of State liability
> but still claim the stone, yes, you could counter-
> claim ownership if you caught it before it landed.
> But you'd have to be careful to never drop it
> outdoors, because at that moment, it would
> become the property of The State!
> 
> Back in the real world, meteorite laws are
> few and vague and meteorite court cases
> are scarce indeed. In this reality, the State
> is usually successful in asserting whatever
> they wish to assert.
> 
> 
> Sterling K. Webb
> -
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Yinan Wang" 
> To: 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 4:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,not 
> meteorite'
> 
> 
> "Then, on the bounce, it touches the Earth and becomes the Property of
> The State."
> 
> So if a meteoroid embeds itself into your car, or you catch it before
> it hits the ground (ya, improbable as it seems), or if bounces off a
> cow and you catch it, does it belong to you now since it did not
> become a meteorite?
> 
> - YvW
> 
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Sterling K. Webb
>  wrote:
>> Any lawyer could argue his way out of this
>> dilema with one simple slip. The "meteorite,"
>> while falling, is a meteoroid, not a meteorite,
>> hence it is under God's jurisdiction.
>>
>> You, your car, your house, your dead dog
>> (or cow) are not the Earth. The meteorite only
>> becomes a meteorite when it touches the
>> Earth, after killing you, perforating your
>> car, smashing your house, or killing your
>> dog. Then, on the bounce, it touches the
>> Earth and becomes the Property of The State.
>>
>> No harm, no fault. Hand it over, please.
>>
>>
>> Sterling K. Webb
>> -
>> - Original Message - From: 
>> To: ; "Martin Altmann"
>> 
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:31 PM
>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, 
>> not
>> meteorite'
>>
>>
>>> Interesting thought Martin...
>>>
>>> I wonder what their position would be regarding a meteorite (that 
>>> belonged
>>> to the state) hitting and injuring/killing somebody?
>>>
>>> Graham, UK
>>>
>>>  Martin Altmann  wrote:

 "A lot of people find slag out of glass furnaces and think they are
 meteorites as well, they kind of look the same."

 Because those people finding real meteorites, lunars and Martians 
 aren't
 coming to Australia. :-(

 Why?

 Because: "if it was
 a meteor it belongs to the WA Government".


 Other question, would WA Government have paid the fixing of the 
 roof, if
 it
 would have been a meteorite?
 I mean, then the damage would have caused by a property of the 
 state,
 wouldn't it?

 Martin

 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
 [mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von 
 Jeff
 Kuyken
 Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. April 2010 16:35
 An: meteorite list
 Betreff: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,not
 meteorite'


 http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/special-features/museum-investigates-meteori
 te-claims/story-e6frg1ac-1225837470139

 Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'


 SCIENTISTS investigating claims a meteor fragment the size of a 
 cricket
 ball

 collided into a WA house have confirmed it was almost certainly a 
 rock.
 The
 object hit the roof of the home about 4pm on Thursday in the
 north-eastern
 Perth suburb of Beechboro.

 A female occupant thought it was a meteor.

 The WA Museum today said the object may have fallen from a plane 
 lowering
 its landing gear.

 The museum's head of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Dr Alex Bevan,
 yesterday
 inspected the object, which he did not suspect was from outer space.

 "Alex did have a look at some photos of the object, but when he did 
 look
 at
 it in person, he did not think it was from a meteorite," a museum
 spokesperson said.

 "Sometimes rocks get caught in the wheels of planes and as they are
 lowering

 their gear they may fall, we just don't know."

 Perth Observatory said it had received a "couple of reports" on 
 Thursday
 night from people pho

Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'

2010-04-13 Thread Martin Altmann
Hi Carl,

If Australia has signed the Moon treaty and the Space treaty, then not.
I rather think the asteroid belt belongs to China, the Moon to Slovakia and
Mars to Algeria. And the rest of the universe to the Philippines.
Don't believe in the lunar land sellers, the Moon was once given by
Frederick II. of Prussia to Mr. Aul Juergens.
So I declare all lunar meteorites and Apollo rocks to be cultural and
natural heritage of Germany - as long as no valid export papers are
delivered, that they once were legally removes and exported from Moon and
imported to Planet Earth.

Let's be rather productive and design a meteorite law for Monaco, Andorra
and Djibouti. The danger is not negligible that once a meteorite will be
found there, and let it be after 2000 years.
Slovakia and Denmark sharply recognized that danger and called together the
most brilliant minds of their nation, to create a law to handle that danger
and these most urgent and important problems of their times. 

...sorry I can't help with that task,
I have to generate tax money in selling meteorites for paying the fireball
camera network, the Aussies got as a gift from the European Union to play
with... 
And it wasn't directly cheap  :-)

Btw. lunars WA can have. They only have to hire a contract finder.

No, we make jokes, but to see the meteoritic decline of Australia
is painful for such collectors like me, who started in the beginning of the
1980ies; dear grandchildren, believe it or not, once upon the time,
Australia was together with the USA the most important meteorite country of
the whole wide world.
But then SOMETHING horrible happened!
All know about, but they are bound by a curse!
The first man or woman in that land, who will name that SOMETHING, will find
a Martian meteorite!  So we never will get to know, what that SOMETHING was!

Also some Australian scientists seem to suffer, I don't have it at hand, but
one of them made a proposal for some new meteorite laws in Australia, it's
somewhere on internet. So there are still some people of good reason to be
found there and maybe not all is lost. Hope dies last.

A small step for B. - a giant leap for Australia!
And it doesn't cost a thing.
(On contrary).

Go West, meanwhile!
Martin






-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von
cdtuc...@cox.net
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. April 2010 00:09
An: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com; Yinan Wang
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not
meteorite'

After a quick Google and Looking at all of the definitions of what a
meteorite is.  None of them say "when". I think it's safe to say that the WA
government has it planned this way and will eventually claim all Lunars as
WA property.. As they will argue that the Moon was formed by a collision
with Earth's WA region  and bounced off. So, by WA law the moon is a
meteorite and belongs to them. They will further argue that Earth itself was
formed by meteorite collisions 4.6 billion years ago so WA also owns all of
the Earth as well as it is just an older meteorite. Thank GOD for lawyers.
WA was afraid they were going to miss out on something. sorry but this also
makes the Moon a terran (Earth) meteorite doesn't it? 

--
Carl or Debbie Esparza
Meteoritemax


 Yinan Wang  wrote: 
> "Then, on the bounce, it touches the Earth and becomes the Property of
> The State."
> 
> So if a meteoroid embeds itself into your car, or you catch it before
> it hits the ground (ya, improbable as it seems), or if bounces off a
> cow and you catch it, does it belong to you now since it did not
> become a meteorite?
> 
> - YvW
> 
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Sterling K. Webb
>  wrote:
> > Any lawyer could argue his way out of this
> > dilema with one simple slip. The "meteorite,"
> > while falling, is a meteoroid, not a meteorite,
> > hence it is under God's jurisdiction.
> >
> > You, your car, your house, your dead dog
> > (or cow) are not the Earth. The meteorite only
> > becomes a meteorite when it touches the
> > Earth, after killing you, perforating your
> > car, smashing your house, or killing your
> > dog. Then, on the bounce, it touches the
> > Earth and becomes the Property of The State.
> >
> > No harm, no fault. Hand it over, please.
> >
> >
> > Sterling K. Webb
> > -
> > - Original Message - From: 
> > To: ; "Martin Altmann"
> > 
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:31 PM
> > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,
not
> > meteorite'
> >
> >
> >> Interesting thought Martin...
> >>
> >> I wonder what their position would be regarding a meteorite (that
belonged
> >> to the state) hitting and injuring/killing somebody?
> >>
> >> Graham, UK
> >>
> >>  Martin Altmann  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> "A lot of people find slag out of glass furnaces and think they are
> >>> meteorites as well,

Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'

2010-04-13 Thread MeteorHntr
In a message dated 4/13/2010 4:29:53 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
veom...@gmail.com writes:
"Then, on the bounce, it touches the Earth and  becomes the Property of
The State."

So if a meteoroid embeds itself  into your car, or you catch it before
it hits the ground (ya, improbable as  it seems), or if bounces off a
cow and you catch it, does it belong to you  now since it did not
become a meteorite?

- YvW
***
 
Veomega,

As I understand, the St. Louis meteorite hit a car and stayed in it  while 
it was being driven down a city street.  On an aside, I don't think  the 
City of St. Louis asserted any claim that it was their  property.

Steve Arnold
of Meteorite Men
 
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'

2010-04-13 Thread Sterling K. Webb

Well, if The State had used the "touched the
Earth" argument to weasel out of State liability
but still claim the stone, yes, you could counter-
claim ownership if you caught it before it landed.
But you'd have to be careful to never drop it
outdoors, because at that moment, it would
become the property of The State!

Back in the real world, meteorite laws are
few and vague and meteorite court cases
are scarce indeed. In this reality, the State
is usually successful in asserting whatever
they wish to assert.


Sterling K. Webb
-
- Original Message - 
From: "Yinan Wang" 

To: 
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,not 
meteorite'



"Then, on the bounce, it touches the Earth and becomes the Property of
The State."

So if a meteoroid embeds itself into your car, or you catch it before
it hits the ground (ya, improbable as it seems), or if bounces off a
cow and you catch it, does it belong to you now since it did not
become a meteorite?

- YvW

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Sterling K. Webb
 wrote:

Any lawyer could argue his way out of this
dilema with one simple slip. The "meteorite,"
while falling, is a meteoroid, not a meteorite,
hence it is under God's jurisdiction.

You, your car, your house, your dead dog
(or cow) are not the Earth. The meteorite only
becomes a meteorite when it touches the
Earth, after killing you, perforating your
car, smashing your house, or killing your
dog. Then, on the bounce, it touches the
Earth and becomes the Property of The State.

No harm, no fault. Hand it over, please.


Sterling K. Webb
-
- Original Message - From: 
To: ; "Martin Altmann"

Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, 
not

meteorite'



Interesting thought Martin...

I wonder what their position would be regarding a meteorite (that 
belonged

to the state) hitting and injuring/killing somebody?

Graham, UK

 Martin Altmann  wrote:


"A lot of people find slag out of glass furnaces and think they are
meteorites as well, they kind of look the same."

Because those people finding real meteorites, lunars and Martians 
aren't

coming to Australia. :-(

Why?

Because: "if it was
a meteor it belongs to the WA Government".


Other question, would WA Government have paid the fixing of the 
roof, if

it
would have been a meteorite?
I mean, then the damage would have caused by a property of the 
state,

wouldn't it?

Martin

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von 
Jeff

Kuyken
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. April 2010 16:35
An: meteorite list
Betreff: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,not
meteorite'


http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/special-features/museum-investigates-meteori
te-claims/story-e6frg1ac-1225837470139

Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'


SCIENTISTS investigating claims a meteor fragment the size of a 
cricket

ball

collided into a WA house have confirmed it was almost certainly a 
rock.

The
object hit the roof of the home about 4pm on Thursday in the
north-eastern
Perth suburb of Beechboro.

A female occupant thought it was a meteor.

The WA Museum today said the object may have fallen from a plane 
lowering

its landing gear.

The museum's head of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Dr Alex Bevan,
yesterday
inspected the object, which he did not suspect was from outer space.

"Alex did have a look at some photos of the object, but when he did 
look

at
it in person, he did not think it was from a meteorite," a museum
spokesperson said.

"Sometimes rocks get caught in the wheels of planes and as they are
lowering

their gear they may fall, we just don't know."

Perth Observatory said it had received a "couple of reports" on 
Thursday

night from people phoning to say they had seen a light in the sky.

"At this stage no one seems to be able to put it all together, but 
if it

was

a meteor it belongs to the WA Government, observatory astronomer 
Ralph

Martyn said.

"The reports at this stage are very sketchy."

He said the observatory was waiting to inspect a photograph of the
object.

"A lot of people find slag out of glass furnaces and think they are
meteorites as well, they kind of look the same."

__
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__

Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'

2010-04-13 Thread Chris Peterson
That's nearly the definition I use, except... I consider a meteor to be just 
the luminous aspect, not the body itself. So in my usage, a meteoroid still 
exists during the meteor phase. That way I can distinguish between the 
incandescent aspects and the body itself.


Chris

*
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com


- Original Message - 
From: "Richard Kowalski" 

To: 
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,not 
meteorite'



I'd argue that a meteoroid becomes a meteor as soon as becomes incandescent 
and it becomes a meteorite at instant incandescence ends.


--
Richard Kowalski

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'

2010-04-13 Thread Martin Altmann
Hi Sterling,

but then falls like Benld, Glanerbrug or the Barwells in the eaves wouldn't
be meteorites in WA.

Hmmm let's skip simply that WA-law.

Quick Bulletin database search - WA had in the last 18 years only 2 new
meteorites.
But in the 40 years before 74 new meteorites in WA,
So that law was a big bs. And really nobody in WA had any advantage from
that.
Preschool maths is required to understand that intellectually.

Huh and we have to take care that those guys from Perth observatory or that
Alex won't be dragged into a comedy show, when once a shower happens there
or when the meteorite men are going on air there, that no press articles
will be published, asking why exactly in Australia no meteorites are found,
in contrast to the rest of the world and in contrast to the times before.

Or do we have to wait for the next generations, as Jason suggested it?
(But why should they find more meteorites then, if now none are found?)

I beg your pardon of all of you, but that law stuff is so silly and I'm
waiting for years now, that somebody could explain me, where the advantage
of such laws would be, only a single reason,
though nobody obviously could so.

O Felix America - O Miser Australia!
Martin

 

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Sterling K. Webb [mailto:sterling_k_w...@sbcglobal.net] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. April 2010 23:07
An: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Cc: Warren Sansoucie; ensoramanda; Martin Altmann
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not
meteorite'

Any lawyer could argue his way out of this
dilema with one simple slip. The "meteorite,"
while falling, is a meteoroid, not a meteorite,
hence it is under God's jurisdiction.

You, your car, your house, your dead dog
(or cow) are not the Earth. The meteorite only
becomes a meteorite when it touches the
Earth, after killing you, perforating your
car, smashing your house, or killing your
dog. Then, on the bounce, it touches the
Earth and becomes the Property of The State.

No harm, no fault. Hand it over, please.


Sterling K. Webb
 

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'

2010-04-13 Thread GeoZay
>>...and it becomes a meteorite at instant  incandescence ends.<<

I've been saying this for years and met  resistance every foot of the way.
geozay  

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'

2010-04-13 Thread cdtucson
After a quick Google and Looking at all of the definitions of what a meteorite 
is.  None of them say "when". I think it's safe to say that the WA government 
has it planned this way and will eventually claim all Lunars as WA property.. 
As they will argue that the Moon was formed by a collision with Earth's WA 
region  and bounced off. So, by WA law the moon is a meteorite and belongs to 
them. They will further argue that Earth itself was formed by meteorite 
collisions 4.6 billion years ago so WA also owns all of the Earth as well as it 
is just an older meteorite. Thank GOD for lawyers.  WA was afraid they were 
going to miss out on something. sorry but this also makes the Moon a terran 
(Earth) meteorite doesn't it? 

--
Carl or Debbie Esparza
Meteoritemax


 Yinan Wang  wrote: 
> "Then, on the bounce, it touches the Earth and becomes the Property of
> The State."
> 
> So if a meteoroid embeds itself into your car, or you catch it before
> it hits the ground (ya, improbable as it seems), or if bounces off a
> cow and you catch it, does it belong to you now since it did not
> become a meteorite?
> 
> - YvW
> 
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Sterling K. Webb
>  wrote:
> > Any lawyer could argue his way out of this
> > dilema with one simple slip. The "meteorite,"
> > while falling, is a meteoroid, not a meteorite,
> > hence it is under God's jurisdiction.
> >
> > You, your car, your house, your dead dog
> > (or cow) are not the Earth. The meteorite only
> > becomes a meteorite when it touches the
> > Earth, after killing you, perforating your
> > car, smashing your house, or killing your
> > dog. Then, on the bounce, it touches the
> > Earth and becomes the Property of The State.
> >
> > No harm, no fault. Hand it over, please.
> >
> >
> > Sterling K. Webb
> > -
> > - Original Message - From: 
> > To: ; "Martin Altmann"
> > 
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:31 PM
> > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not
> > meteorite'
> >
> >
> >> Interesting thought Martin...
> >>
> >> I wonder what their position would be regarding a meteorite (that belonged
> >> to the state) hitting and injuring/killing somebody?
> >>
> >> Graham, UK
> >>
> >>  Martin Altmann  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> "A lot of people find slag out of glass furnaces and think they are
> >>> meteorites as well, they kind of look the same."
> >>>
> >>> Because those people finding real meteorites, lunars and Martians aren't
> >>> coming to Australia.  :-(
> >>>
> >>> Why?
> >>>
> >>> Because: "if it was
> >>> a meteor it belongs to the WA Government".
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Other question, would WA Government have paid the fixing of the roof, if
> >>> it
> >>> would have been a meteorite?
> >>> I mean, then the damage would have caused by a property of the state,
> >>> wouldn't it?
> >>>
> >>> Martin
> >>>
> >>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> >>> Von: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
> >>> [mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Jeff
> >>> Kuyken
> >>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. April 2010 16:35
> >>> An: meteorite list
> >>> Betreff: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,not
> >>> meteorite'
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/special-features/museum-investigates-meteori
> >>> te-claims/story-e6frg1ac-1225837470139
> >>>
> >>> Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> SCIENTISTS investigating claims a meteor fragment the size of a cricket
> >>> ball
> >>>
> >>> collided into a WA house have confirmed it was almost certainly a rock.
> >>> The
> >>> object hit the roof of the home about 4pm on Thursday in the
> >>> north-eastern
> >>> Perth suburb of Beechboro.
> >>>
> >>> A female occupant thought it was a meteor.
> >>>
> >>> The WA Museum today said the object may have fallen from a plane lowering
> >>> its landing gear.
> >>>
> >>> The museum's head of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Dr Alex Bevan,
> >>> yesterday
> >>> inspected the object, which he did not suspect was from outer space.
> >>>
> >>> "Alex did have a look at some photos of the object, but when he did look
> >>> at
> >>> it in person, he did not think it was from a meteorite," a museum
> >>> spokesperson said.
> >>>
> >>> "Sometimes rocks get caught in the wheels of planes and as they are
> >>> lowering
> >>>
> >>> their gear they may fall, we just don't know."
> >>>
> >>> Perth Observatory said it had received a "couple of reports" on Thursday
> >>> night from people phoning to say they had seen a light in the sky.
> >>>
> >>> "At this stage no one seems to be able to put it all together, but if it
> >>> was
> >>>
> >>> a meteor it belongs to the WA Government, observatory astronomer Ralph
> >>> Martyn said.
> >>>
> >>> "The reports at this stage are very sketchy."
> >>>
> >>> He said the observatory was waiting to inspect a photograph of the
> >>> object.
> >>>
> >>> "A lot of

Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'

2010-04-13 Thread Richard Kowalski
I'd argue that a meteoroid becomes a meteor as soon as becomes incandescent and 
it becomes a meteorite at instant incandescence ends.

--
Richard Kowalski
Full Moon Photography
IMCA #1081


--- On Tue, 4/13/10, Yinan Wang  wrote:

> From: Yinan Wang 
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not  
> meteorite'
> To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> Date: Tuesday, April 13, 2010, 2:29 PM
> "Then, on the bounce, it touches the
> Earth and becomes the Property of
> The State."
> 
> So if a meteoroid embeds itself into your car, or you catch
> it before
> it hits the ground (ya, improbable as it seems), or if
> bounces off a
> cow and you catch it, does it belong to you now since it
> did not
> become a meteorite?
> 
> - YvW
> 
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Sterling K. Webb
> 
> wrote:
> > Any lawyer could argue his way out of this
> > dilema with one simple slip. The "meteorite,"
> > while falling, is a meteoroid, not a meteorite,
> > hence it is under God's jurisdiction.
> >
> > You, your car, your house, your dead dog
> > (or cow) are not the Earth. The meteorite only
> > becomes a meteorite when it touches the
> > Earth, after killing you, perforating your
> > car, smashing your house, or killing your
> > dog. Then, on the bounce, it touches the
> > Earth and becomes the Property of The State.
> >
> > No harm, no fault. Hand it over, please.
> >
> >
> > Sterling K. Webb
> >
> -
> > - Original Message - From: 
> > To: ;
> "Martin Altmann"
> > 
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:31 PM
> > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation:
> 'Probably a rock, not
> > meteorite'
> >
> >
> >> Interesting thought Martin...
> >>
> >> I wonder what their position would be regarding a
> meteorite (that belonged
> >> to the state) hitting and injuring/killing
> somebody?
> >>
> >> Graham, UK
> >>
> >>  Martin Altmann 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> "A lot of people find slag out of glass
> furnaces and think they are
> >>> meteorites as well, they kind of look the
> same."
> >>>
> >>> Because those people finding real meteorites,
> lunars and Martians aren't
> >>> coming to Australia.  :-(
> >>>
> >>> Why?
> >>>
> >>> Because: "if it was
> >>> a meteor it belongs to the WA Government".
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Other question, would WA Government have paid
> the fixing of the roof, if
> >>> it
> >>> would have been a meteorite?
> >>> I mean, then the damage would have caused by a
> property of the state,
> >>> wouldn't it?
> >>>
> >>> Martin
> >>>
> >>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> >>> Von: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
> >>> [mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com]
> Im Auftrag von Jeff
> >>> Kuyken
> >>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. April 2010 16:35
> >>> An: meteorite list
> >>> Betreff: [meteorite-list] Museum
> investigation: 'Probably a rock,not
> >>> meteorite'
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/special-features/museum-investigates-meteori
> >>> te-claims/story-e6frg1ac-1225837470139
> >>>
> >>> Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not
> meteorite'
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> SCIENTISTS investigating claims a meteor
> fragment the size of a cricket
> >>> ball
> >>>
> >>> collided into a WA house have confirmed it was
> almost certainly a rock.
> >>> The
> >>> object hit the roof of the home about 4pm on
> Thursday in the
> >>> north-eastern
> >>> Perth suburb of Beechboro.
> >>>
> >>> A female occupant thought it was a meteor.
> >>>
> >>> The WA Museum today said the object may have
> fallen from a plane lowering
> >>> its landing gear.
> >>>
> >>> The museum's head of Earth and Planetary
> Sciences, Dr Alex Bevan,
> >>> yesterday
> >>> inspected the object, which he did not suspect
> was from outer space.
> >>>
> >>> "Alex did have a look at some photos of the
> object, but when he did look
> >>> at
> >>> it in person, he did not think it was from a
> meteorite," a museum
> >>> spokesperson said.
> >>>
> >>> "Sometimes rocks get caught in the wheels of
> planes and as they are
> >>> lowering
> >>>
> >>> their gear they may fall, we just don't
> know."
> >>>
> >>> Perth Observatory said it had received a
> "couple of reports" on Thursday
> >>> night from people phoning to say they had seen
> a light in the sky.
> >>>
> >>> "At this stage no one seems to be able to put
> it all together, but if it
> >>> was
> >>>
> >>> a meteor it belongs to the WA Government,
> observatory astronomer Ralph
> >>> Martyn said.
> >>>
> >>> "The reports at this stage are very sketchy."
> >>>
> >>> He said the observatory was waiting to inspect
> a photograph of the
> >>> object.
> >>>
> >>> "A lot of people find slag out of glass
> furnaces and think they are
> >>> meteorites as well, they kind of look the
> same."
> >>>
> >>>
> __
> >>> Visit the Archives at
> >>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> >>> Meteorite-list mailing list

[meteorite-list] Oh, the humanity!

2010-04-13 Thread Darren Garrison
Er, "oh the alien-anity?"

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/04/13/astronomer-earth-like-planets-are-common-but-stars-have-eaten-many/
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Planets continue being weird

2010-04-13 Thread Darren Garrison
http://www.eso.org/public/news/eso1016/

Turning Planetary Theory Upside Down

13 April 2010

The discovery of nine new transiting exoplanets is announced today at the RAS
National Astronomy Meeting (NAM2010). When these new results were combined with
earlier observations of transiting exoplanets astronomers were surprised to find
that six out of a larger sample of 27 were found to be orbiting in the opposite
direction to the rotation of their host star — the exact reverse of what is seen
in our own Solar System. The new discoveries provide an unexpected and serious
challenge to current theories of planet formation. They also suggest that
systems with exoplanets of the type known as hot Jupiters are unlikely to
contain Earth-like planets.

“This is a real bomb we are dropping into the field of exoplanets,” says Amaury
Triaud, a PhD student at the Geneva Observatory who, with Andrew Cameron and
Didier Queloz, leads a major part of the observational campaign.

Planets are thought to form in the disc of gas and dust encircling a young star.
This proto-planetary disc rotates in the same direction as the star itself, and
up to now it was expected that planets that form from the disc would all orbit
in more or less the same plane, and that they would move along their orbits in
the same direction as the star’s rotation. This is the case for the planets in
the Solar System.

After the initial detection of the nine new exoplanets [1] with the Wide Angle
Search for Planets (WASP, [2]), the team of astronomers used the HARPS
spectrograph on the 3.6-metre ESO telescope at the La Silla observatory in
Chile, along with data from the Swiss Euler telescope, also at La Silla, and
data from other telescopes to confirm the discoveries and characterise the
transiting exoplanets [3] found in both the new and older surveys.

Surprisingly, when the team combined the new data with older observations they
found that more than half of all the hot Jupiters [4] studied have orbits that
are misaligned with the rotation axis of their parent stars. They even found
that six exoplanets in this extended study (of which two are new discoveries)
have retrograde motion: they orbit their star in the “wrong” direction.

“The new results really challenge the conventional wisdom that planets should
always orbit in the same direction as their stars spin,” says Andrew Cameron of
the University of St Andrews, who presented the new results at the RAS National
Astronomy Meeting (NAM2010) in Glasgow this week.

In the 15 years since the first hot Jupiters were discovered, their origin has
been a puzzle. These are planets with masses similar to or greater than that of
Jupiter, but that orbit very close to their suns. The cores of giant planets are
thought to form from a mix of rock and ice particles found only in the cold
outer reaches of planetary systems. Hot Jupiters must therefore form far from
their star and subsequently migrate inwards to orbits much closer to the parent
star. Many astronomers believed this was due to gravitational interactions with
the disc of dust from which they formed. This scenario takes place over a few
million years and results in an orbit aligned with the rotation axis of the
parent star. It would also allow Earth-like rocky planets to form subsequently,
but unfortunately it cannot account for the new observations.

To account for the new retrograde exoplanets an alternative migration theory
suggests that the proximity of hot Jupiters to their stars is not due to
interactions with the dust disc at all, but to a slower evolution process
involving a gravitational tug-of-war with more distant planetary or stellar
companions over hundreds of millions of years. After these disturbances have
bounced a giant exoplanet into a tilted and elongated orbit it would suffer
tidal friction, losing energy every time it swung close to the star. It would
eventually become parked in a near circular, but randomly tilted, orbit close to
the star. “A dramatic side-effect of this process is that it would wipe out any
other smaller Earth-like planet in these systems,” says Didier Queloz of Geneva
Observatory.

Two of the newly discovered retrograde planets have already been found to have
more distant, massive companions that could potentially be the cause of the
upset. These new results will trigger an intensive search for additional bodies
in other planetary systems.

This research was presented at the Royal Astronomical Society National Astronomy
Meeting (NAM2010) that is taking place this week in Glasgow, Scotland. Nine
publications submitted to international journals will be released on this
occasion, four of them using data from ESO facilities. On the same occasion, the
WASP consortium was awarded the 2010 Royal Astronomical Society Group
Achievement Award.
Notes

[1] The current count of known exoplanets is 454.

[2] The nine newly found exoplanets were discovered by the Wide Angle Search for
Planets (WASP). WASP comprises two robotic obser

Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'

2010-04-13 Thread Yinan Wang
"Then, on the bounce, it touches the Earth and becomes the Property of
The State."

So if a meteoroid embeds itself into your car, or you catch it before
it hits the ground (ya, improbable as it seems), or if bounces off a
cow and you catch it, does it belong to you now since it did not
become a meteorite?

- YvW

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Sterling K. Webb
 wrote:
> Any lawyer could argue his way out of this
> dilema with one simple slip. The "meteorite,"
> while falling, is a meteoroid, not a meteorite,
> hence it is under God's jurisdiction.
>
> You, your car, your house, your dead dog
> (or cow) are not the Earth. The meteorite only
> becomes a meteorite when it touches the
> Earth, after killing you, perforating your
> car, smashing your house, or killing your
> dog. Then, on the bounce, it touches the
> Earth and becomes the Property of The State.
>
> No harm, no fault. Hand it over, please.
>
>
> Sterling K. Webb
> -
> - Original Message - From: 
> To: ; "Martin Altmann"
> 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not
> meteorite'
>
>
>> Interesting thought Martin...
>>
>> I wonder what their position would be regarding a meteorite (that belonged
>> to the state) hitting and injuring/killing somebody?
>>
>> Graham, UK
>>
>>  Martin Altmann  wrote:
>>>
>>> "A lot of people find slag out of glass furnaces and think they are
>>> meteorites as well, they kind of look the same."
>>>
>>> Because those people finding real meteorites, lunars and Martians aren't
>>> coming to Australia.  :-(
>>>
>>> Why?
>>>
>>> Because: "if it was
>>> a meteor it belongs to the WA Government".
>>>
>>>
>>> Other question, would WA Government have paid the fixing of the roof, if
>>> it
>>> would have been a meteorite?
>>> I mean, then the damage would have caused by a property of the state,
>>> wouldn't it?
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>>> Von: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
>>> [mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Jeff
>>> Kuyken
>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. April 2010 16:35
>>> An: meteorite list
>>> Betreff: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,not
>>> meteorite'
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/special-features/museum-investigates-meteori
>>> te-claims/story-e6frg1ac-1225837470139
>>>
>>> Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'
>>>
>>>
>>> SCIENTISTS investigating claims a meteor fragment the size of a cricket
>>> ball
>>>
>>> collided into a WA house have confirmed it was almost certainly a rock.
>>> The
>>> object hit the roof of the home about 4pm on Thursday in the
>>> north-eastern
>>> Perth suburb of Beechboro.
>>>
>>> A female occupant thought it was a meteor.
>>>
>>> The WA Museum today said the object may have fallen from a plane lowering
>>> its landing gear.
>>>
>>> The museum's head of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Dr Alex Bevan,
>>> yesterday
>>> inspected the object, which he did not suspect was from outer space.
>>>
>>> "Alex did have a look at some photos of the object, but when he did look
>>> at
>>> it in person, he did not think it was from a meteorite," a museum
>>> spokesperson said.
>>>
>>> "Sometimes rocks get caught in the wheels of planes and as they are
>>> lowering
>>>
>>> their gear they may fall, we just don't know."
>>>
>>> Perth Observatory said it had received a "couple of reports" on Thursday
>>> night from people phoning to say they had seen a light in the sky.
>>>
>>> "At this stage no one seems to be able to put it all together, but if it
>>> was
>>>
>>> a meteor it belongs to the WA Government, observatory astronomer Ralph
>>> Martyn said.
>>>
>>> "The reports at this stage are very sketchy."
>>>
>>> He said the observatory was waiting to inspect a photograph of the
>>> object.
>>>
>>> "A lot of people find slag out of glass furnaces and think they are
>>> meteorites as well, they kind of look the same."
>>>
>>> __
>>> Visit the Archives at
>>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>>
>>> __
>>> Visit the Archives at
>>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>
>> __
>> Visit the Archives at
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>
>
> __
> Visit the Archives at
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailin

Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'

2010-04-13 Thread Sterling K. Webb

Any lawyer could argue his way out of this
dilema with one simple slip. The "meteorite,"
while falling, is a meteoroid, not a meteorite,
hence it is under God's jurisdiction.

You, your car, your house, your dead dog
(or cow) are not the Earth. The meteorite only
becomes a meteorite when it touches the
Earth, after killing you, perforating your
car, smashing your house, or killing your
dog. Then, on the bounce, it touches the
Earth and becomes the Property of The State.

No harm, no fault. Hand it over, please.


Sterling K. Webb
-
- Original Message - 
From: 
To: ; "Martin Altmann" 


Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, 
not meteorite'




Interesting thought Martin...

I wonder what their position would be regarding a meteorite (that 
belonged to the state) hitting and injuring/killing somebody?


Graham, UK

 Martin Altmann  wrote:

"A lot of people find slag out of glass furnaces and think they are
meteorites as well, they kind of look the same."

Because those people finding real meteorites, lunars and Martians 
aren't

coming to Australia.  :-(

Why?

Because: "if it was
a meteor it belongs to the WA Government".


Other question, would WA Government have paid the fixing of the roof, 
if it

would have been a meteorite?
I mean, then the damage would have caused by a property of the state,
wouldn't it?

Martin

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von 
Jeff

Kuyken
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. April 2010 16:35
An: meteorite list
Betreff: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,not
meteorite'

http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/special-features/museum-investigates-meteori
te-claims/story-e6frg1ac-1225837470139

Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'


SCIENTISTS investigating claims a meteor fragment the size of a 
cricket ball


collided into a WA house have confirmed it was almost certainly a 
rock. The
object hit the roof of the home about 4pm on Thursday in the 
north-eastern

Perth suburb of Beechboro.

A female occupant thought it was a meteor.

The WA Museum today said the object may have fallen from a plane 
lowering

its landing gear.

The museum's head of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Dr Alex Bevan, 
yesterday

inspected the object, which he did not suspect was from outer space.

"Alex did have a look at some photos of the object, but when he did 
look at

it in person, he did not think it was from a meteorite," a museum
spokesperson said.

"Sometimes rocks get caught in the wheels of planes and as they are 
lowering


their gear they may fall, we just don't know."

Perth Observatory said it had received a "couple of reports" on 
Thursday

night from people phoning to say they had seen a light in the sky.

"At this stage no one seems to be able to put it all together, but if 
it was


a meteor it belongs to the WA Government, observatory astronomer 
Ralph

Martyn said.

"The reports at this stage are very sketchy."

He said the observatory was waiting to inspect a photograph of the 
object.


"A lot of people find slag out of glass furnaces and think they are
meteorites as well, they kind of look the same."

__
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Visit the Archives at 
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html

Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
Visit the Archives at 
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html

Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'

2010-04-13 Thread Warren Sansoucie


They would call it an 'Act Of God".
 
Warren Sansoucie
 


> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:31:44 +0100
> From: ensorama...@ntlworld.com
> To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com; altm...@meteorite-martin.de
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not 
> meteorite'
>
> Interesting thought Martin...
>
> I wonder what their position would be regarding a meteorite (that belonged to 
> the state) hitting and injuring/killing somebody?
>
> Graham, UK
>
>  Martin Altmann wrote:
>> "A lot of people find slag out of glass furnaces and think they are
>> meteorites as well, they kind of look the same."
>>
>> Because those people finding real meteorites, lunars and Martians aren't
>> coming to Australia. :-(
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> Because: "if it was
>> a meteor it belongs to the WA Government".
>>
>>
>> Other question, would WA Government have paid the fixing of the roof, if it
>> would have been a meteorite?
>> I mean, then the damage would have caused by a property of the state,
>> wouldn't it?
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
>> [mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Jeff
>> Kuyken
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. April 2010 16:35
>> An: meteorite list
>> Betreff: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,not
>> meteorite'
>>
>> http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/special-features/museum-investigates-meteori
>> te-claims/story-e6frg1ac-1225837470139
>>
>> Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'
>>
>>
>> SCIENTISTS investigating claims a meteor fragment the size of a cricket ball
>>
>> collided into a WA house have confirmed it was almost certainly a rock. The
>> object hit the roof of the home about 4pm on Thursday in the north-eastern
>> Perth suburb of Beechboro.
>>
>> A female occupant thought it was a meteor.
>>
>> The WA Museum today said the object may have fallen from a plane lowering
>> its landing gear.
>>
>> The museum's head of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Dr Alex Bevan, yesterday
>> inspected the object, which he did not suspect was from outer space.
>>
>> "Alex did have a look at some photos of the object, but when he did look at
>> it in person, he did not think it was from a meteorite," a museum
>> spokesperson said.
>>
>> "Sometimes rocks get caught in the wheels of planes and as they are lowering
>>
>> their gear they may fall, we just don't know."
>>
>> Perth Observatory said it had received a "couple of reports" on Thursday
>> night from people phoning to say they had seen a light in the sky.
>>
>> "At this stage no one seems to be able to put it all together, but if it was
>>
>> a meteor it belongs to the WA Government, observatory astronomer Ralph
>> Martyn said.
>>
>> "The reports at this stage are very sketchy."
>>
>> He said the observatory was waiting to inspect a photograph of the object.
>>
>> "A lot of people find slag out of glass furnaces and think they are
>> meteorites as well, they kind of look the same."
>>
>> __
>> Visit the Archives at
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>
>> __
>> Visit the Archives at 
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
> __
> Visit the Archives at 
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list   
>   
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'

2010-04-13 Thread ensoramanda
Interesting thought Martin...

I wonder what their position would be regarding a meteorite (that belonged to 
the state) hitting and injuring/killing somebody?

Graham, UK

 Martin Altmann  wrote: 
> "A lot of people find slag out of glass furnaces and think they are
> meteorites as well, they kind of look the same."
> 
> Because those people finding real meteorites, lunars and Martians aren't
> coming to Australia.  :-(
> 
> Why?
> 
> Because: "if it was 
> a meteor it belongs to the WA Government".
> 
> 
> Other question, would WA Government have paid the fixing of the roof, if it
> would have been a meteorite?
> I mean, then the damage would have caused by a property of the state,
> wouldn't it?
> 
> Martin
> 
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
> [mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Jeff
> Kuyken
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. April 2010 16:35
> An: meteorite list
> Betreff: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,not
> meteorite'
> 
> http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/special-features/museum-investigates-meteori
> te-claims/story-e6frg1ac-1225837470139
> 
> Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'
> 
> 
> SCIENTISTS investigating claims a meteor fragment the size of a cricket ball
> 
> collided into a WA house have confirmed it was almost certainly a rock. The 
> object hit the roof of the home about 4pm on Thursday in the north-eastern 
> Perth suburb of Beechboro.
> 
> A female occupant thought it was a meteor.
> 
> The WA Museum today said the object may have fallen from a plane lowering 
> its landing gear.
> 
> The museum's head of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Dr Alex Bevan, yesterday 
> inspected the object, which he did not suspect was from outer space.
> 
> "Alex did have a look at some photos of the object, but when he did look at 
> it in person, he did not think it was from a meteorite," a museum 
> spokesperson said.
> 
> "Sometimes rocks get caught in the wheels of planes and as they are lowering
> 
> their gear they may fall, we just don't know."
> 
> Perth Observatory said it had received a "couple of reports" on Thursday 
> night from people phoning to say they had seen a light in the sky.
> 
> "At this stage no one seems to be able to put it all together, but if it was
> 
> a meteor it belongs to the WA Government, observatory astronomer Ralph 
> Martyn said.
> 
> "The reports at this stage are very sketchy."
> 
> He said the observatory was waiting to inspect a photograph of the object.
> 
> "A lot of people find slag out of glass furnaces and think they are 
> meteorites as well, they kind of look the same."
> 
> __
> Visit the Archives at
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> 
> __
> Visit the Archives at 
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] RFS-POD Paul Swart's Gibeon

2010-04-13 Thread Charley
Wow!  Absolutely beautiful!

Very nice piece Paul!


Best regards,

Charley

"Well, squids don't work. Hey! Let's
  try elephants !"

Hannibal

>
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 06:55:30 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Michael Johnson 
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Rocks from Space Picture of the Day - April
> 13, 2010
> To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> Message-ID:
> <1377989231.2066141271166930116.javamail.r...@mbs1.homesteadmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> http://www.rocksfromspace.org/April_13_2010.html
>


__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'

2010-04-13 Thread GREG LINDH

 
Hi Martin, 
 
  I thought the last two lines in your email were great:
 
 "Other question, would WA Government have paid the fixing of the roof, if it 
would have been a meteorite?
I mean, then the damage would have caused by a property of the state,wouldn't 
it?" 
 
  Good pointI had to laugh at that one!  
 
 
  Greg
 
 
 



> From: altm...@meteorite-martin.de
> To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:29:58 +0200
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not 
> meteorite'
>
> "A lot of people find slag out of glass furnaces and think they are
> meteorites as well, they kind of look the same."
>
> Because those people finding real meteorites, lunars and Martians aren't
> coming to Australia. :-(
>
> Why?
>
> Because: "if it was
> a meteor it belongs to the WA Government".
>
>
> Other question, would WA Government have paid the fixing of the roof, if it
> would have been a meteorite?
> I mean, then the damage would have caused by a property of the state,
> wouldn't it?
>
> Martin
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
> [mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Jeff
> Kuyken
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. April 2010 16:35
> An: meteorite list
> Betreff: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,not
> meteorite'
>
> http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/special-features/museum-investigates-meteori
> te-claims/story-e6frg1ac-1225837470139
>
> Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'
>
>
> SCIENTISTS investigating claims a meteor fragment the size of a cricket ball
>
> collided into a WA house have confirmed it was almost certainly a rock. The
> object hit the roof of the home about 4pm on Thursday in the north-eastern
> Perth suburb of Beechboro.
>
> A female occupant thought it was a meteor.
>
> The WA Museum today said the object may have fallen from a plane lowering
> its landing gear.
>
> The museum's head of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Dr Alex Bevan, yesterday
> inspected the object, which he did not suspect was from outer space.
>
> "Alex did have a look at some photos of the object, but when he did look at
> it in person, he did not think it was from a meteorite," a museum
> spokesperson said.
>
> "Sometimes rocks get caught in the wheels of planes and as they are lowering
>
> their gear they may fall, we just don't know."
>
> Perth Observatory said it had received a "couple of reports" on Thursday
> night from people phoning to say they had seen a light in the sky.
>
> "At this stage no one seems to be able to put it all together, but if it was
>
> a meteor it belongs to the WA Government, observatory astronomer Ralph
> Martyn said.
>
> "The reports at this stage are very sketchy."
>
> He said the observatory was waiting to inspect a photograph of the object.
>
> "A lot of people find slag out of glass furnaces and think they are
> meteorites as well, they kind of look the same."
>
> __
> Visit the Archives at
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
> __
> Visit the Archives at 
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list   
>   
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'

2010-04-13 Thread Martin Altmann
"A lot of people find slag out of glass furnaces and think they are
meteorites as well, they kind of look the same."

Because those people finding real meteorites, lunars and Martians aren't
coming to Australia.  :-(

Why?

Because: "if it was 
a meteor it belongs to the WA Government".


Other question, would WA Government have paid the fixing of the roof, if it
would have been a meteorite?
I mean, then the damage would have caused by a property of the state,
wouldn't it?

Martin

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Jeff
Kuyken
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. April 2010 16:35
An: meteorite list
Betreff: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,not
meteorite'

http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/special-features/museum-investigates-meteori
te-claims/story-e6frg1ac-1225837470139

Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'


SCIENTISTS investigating claims a meteor fragment the size of a cricket ball

collided into a WA house have confirmed it was almost certainly a rock. The 
object hit the roof of the home about 4pm on Thursday in the north-eastern 
Perth suburb of Beechboro.

A female occupant thought it was a meteor.

The WA Museum today said the object may have fallen from a plane lowering 
its landing gear.

The museum's head of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Dr Alex Bevan, yesterday 
inspected the object, which he did not suspect was from outer space.

"Alex did have a look at some photos of the object, but when he did look at 
it in person, he did not think it was from a meteorite," a museum 
spokesperson said.

"Sometimes rocks get caught in the wheels of planes and as they are lowering

their gear they may fall, we just don't know."

Perth Observatory said it had received a "couple of reports" on Thursday 
night from people phoning to say they had seen a light in the sky.

"At this stage no one seems to be able to put it all together, but if it was

a meteor it belongs to the WA Government, observatory astronomer Ralph 
Martyn said.

"The reports at this stage are very sketchy."

He said the observatory was waiting to inspect a photograph of the object.

"A lot of people find slag out of glass furnaces and think they are 
meteorites as well, they kind of look the same."

__
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'

2010-04-13 Thread Jeff Kuyken

http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/special-features/museum-investigates-meteorite-claims/story-e6frg1ac-1225837470139

Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'


SCIENTISTS investigating claims a meteor fragment the size of a cricket ball 
collided into a WA house have confirmed it was almost certainly a rock. The 
object hit the roof of the home about 4pm on Thursday in the north-eastern 
Perth suburb of Beechboro.


A female occupant thought it was a meteor.

The WA Museum today said the object may have fallen from a plane lowering 
its landing gear.


The museum's head of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Dr Alex Bevan, yesterday 
inspected the object, which he did not suspect was from outer space.


"Alex did have a look at some photos of the object, but when he did look at 
it in person, he did not think it was from a meteorite," a museum 
spokesperson said.


"Sometimes rocks get caught in the wheels of planes and as they are lowering 
their gear they may fall, we just don't know."


Perth Observatory said it had received a "couple of reports" on Thursday 
night from people phoning to say they had seen a light in the sky.


"At this stage no one seems to be able to put it all together, but if it was 
a meteor it belongs to the WA Government, observatory astronomer Ralph 
Martyn said.


"The reports at this stage are very sketchy."

He said the observatory was waiting to inspect a photograph of the object.

"A lot of people find slag out of glass furnaces and think they are 
meteorites as well, they kind of look the same."


__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Rocks from Space Picture of the Day - April 13, 2010

2010-04-13 Thread Michael Johnson
http://www.rocksfromspace.org/April_13_2010.html




---



__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] test

2010-04-13 Thread GERALD FLAHERTY
from my new mac mini
Jerry Flaherty
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list