[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2013-04-09 Thread valparint
Today's Meteorite Picture of the Day: Girgenti

Contributed by: Anonymous

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpod.asp
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD: In Honor of Vesta

2013-04-09 Thread valparint
Dear Collectors,

Check out the Vesta-Tatahouine-Dawn trinket at 

  http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/tatacoin.asp

10% off for MetList members :)

Thanks for looking.

Paul Swartz
IMCA 5204
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Significant digits

2013-04-09 Thread Matson, Robert D.
Hi Greg,

Good old empty precision on a number converted from metric units.
11,000 metric tons = 24250848.8 lbs.  The humorous thing is that
I seriously doubt the original mass is known to better than a
factor of 3, so none of the digits are significant.  --Rob

__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Significant digits

2013-04-09 Thread GREG LINDH
Thanks for the explanation, Rob.  That makes it a lot easier for me to accept.  
Sometimes claims by scientists mystify me.  This was one of those times, but I 
understand it now.  Thanks again.


  Greg L.




 Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:54:43 -0700
 From: robert.d.mat...@saic.com
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Significant digits

 Hi Greg,

 Good old empty precision on a number converted from metric units.
 11,000 metric tons = 24250848.8 lbs. The humorous thing is that
 I seriously doubt the original mass is known to better than a
 factor of 3, so none of the digits are significant. --Rob

 __

 Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list   
   
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Significant digits

2013-04-09 Thread Don Merchant
Wouldn't it of progressively obtained more weight as it came closer to the 
surface of the Earth? Isn't it true the higher you climb into the sky the 
less you would weigh so if true then the opposite must be true! So what was 
the weight when it exploded, since it was closer to the surface of the Earth 
as opposed to entering the atmosphere? Hmmm...a  little food for thought to 
factor in to all you geniuses out there.

Sincerely
Don Merchant
- Original Message - 
From: Matson, Robert D. robert.d.mat...@saic.com

To: meteorite-list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 3:54 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Significant digits



Hi Greg,

Good old empty precision on a number converted from metric units.
11,000 metric tons = 24250848.8 lbs.  The humorous thing is that
I seriously doubt the original mass is known to better than a
factor of 3, so none of the digits are significant.  --Rob

__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 


__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Significant digits

2013-04-09 Thread Michael Mulgrew
Kilograms are a unit of mass, which is regardless of the force of
gravity.  Although often spoken of as weight, correctly it should be
referred to as mass.

Michael in so. Cal.

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Don Merchant dmerc...@rochester.rr.com wrote:

 Wouldn't it of progressively obtained more weight as it came closer to the 
 surface of the Earth? Isn't it true the higher you climb into the sky the 
 less you would weigh so if true then the opposite must be true! So what was 
 the weight when it exploded, since it was closer to the surface of the Earth 
 as opposed to entering the atmosphere? Hmmm...a  little food for thought to 
 factor in to all you geniuses out there.
 Sincerely
 Don Merchant
 - Original Message - From: Matson, Robert D. 
 robert.d.mat...@saic.com
 To: meteorite-list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 3:54 PM
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Significant digits



 Hi Greg,

 Good old empty precision on a number converted from metric units.
 11,000 metric tons = 24250848.8 lbs.  The humorous thing is that
 I seriously doubt the original mass is known to better than a
 factor of 3, so none of the digits are significant.  --Rob

 __

 Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


 __

 Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Significant digits

2013-04-09 Thread Mendy Ouzillou
Anyone willing to sell me a large lunar stone based on it's lunar weight but 
earth $/g, let me know.

 
Mendy



 From: Michael Mulgrew mikest...@gmail.com
To: Don Merchant dmerc...@rochester.rr.com 
Cc: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com 
Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Significant digits
 
Kilograms are a unit of mass, which is regardless of the force of
gravity.  Although often spoken of as weight, correctly it should be
referred to as mass.

Michael in so. Cal.

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Don Merchant dmerc...@rochester.rr.com wrote:

 Wouldn't it of progressively obtained more weight as it came closer to the 
 surface of the Earth? Isn't it true the higher you climb into the sky the 
 less you would weigh so if true then the opposite must be true! So what was 
 the weight when it exploded, since it was closer to the surface of the Earth 
 as opposed to entering the atmosphere? Hmmm...a  little food for thought to 
 factor in to all you geniuses out there.
 Sincerely
 Don Merchant
 - Original Message - From: Matson, Robert D. 
 robert.d.mat...@saic.com
 To: meteorite-list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 3:54 PM
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Significant digits



 Hi Greg,

 Good old empty precision on a number converted from metric units.
 11,000 metric tons = 24250848.8 lbs.  The humorous thing is that
 I seriously doubt the original mass is known to better than a
 factor of 3, so none of the digits are significant.  --Rob

 __

 Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


 __

 Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Significant digits

2013-04-09 Thread Prof. Zelimir Gabelica Université de Haute Alsace ENSCMu,

Michael, you are totally correct.

Did you notice that the current usage (in MetBull but also in some  
official scientific papers) is that one always writes total known  
weight but also main mass ?


Is this now fully admitted or tolerated or ...just odd ?

I was puzzled with this years ago but soon admitted this practice so  
that I even use it as such in my collection writeups at least  
until TKW is one day officially corrected by someone responsible  
and concerned to TKM


Zelimir
--
Prof. Zelimir Gabelica
Université de Haute Alsace
ENSCMu, Lab. LPI-GSEC,
3, Rue A. Werner,
F-68093 Mulhouse Cedex, France
Tel: +33 (0)3 89 33 68 94


Michael Mulgrew mikest...@gmail.com a écrit :


Kilograms are a unit of mass, which is regardless of the force of
gravity.  Although often spoken of as weight, correctly it should be
referred to as mass.

Michael in so. Cal.





__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Significant digits

2013-04-09 Thread Chris Peterson
Weight is a force, properly measured in Newtons (or some other unit of 
force). And strictly, your comment should have referred to the 
acceleration of gravity, not the force of gravity. Of course, mass and 
weight are related by Newton's Second Law, F=ma. And it is quite true 
that the acceleration of gravity changes with height, and therefore the 
weight changes as well, since the mass is invariant (except for the 
little detail of ablation...)


Chris

***
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com

On 4/9/2013 3:08 PM, Michael Mulgrew wrote:

Kilograms are a unit of mass, which is regardless of the force of
gravity.  Although often spoken of as weight, correctly it should be
referred to as mass.

Michael in so. Cal.


__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Progress 49 To Reenter Earth's Atmosphere on April 15

2013-04-09 Thread Ron Baalke


April 9, 2013

Joshua Buck 
Headquarters, Washington 
202-358-1100 
jb...@nasa.gov 

Josh Byerly 
Johnson Space Center, Houston 
281-483-5111 
josh.bye...@nasa.gov 

MEDIA ADVISORY: M13-058

NASA TV PROVIDES COVERAGE OF SPACE STATION CARGO SHIP ACTIVITIES

WASHINGTON -- NASA Television will broadcast an unpiloted Russian 
cargo ship's departure from the International Space Station on April 
15 and the launch and docking of another April 24 and 26. 

The ISS Progress 49 resupply ship, which arrived at the station in 
late October, will depart the rear port of the station's Zvezda 
service module at 8:01 a.m. EDT, April 15. NASA TV coverage of the 
undocking will begin at 7:45 a.m. Progress 49 will reenter Earth's 
atmosphere several days later and burn up over the Pacific Ocean. 

Progress 49's departure will clear the way for the arrival of the ISS 
Progress 51 cargo craft. Loaded with more than 3 tons of food, fuel, 
supplies and experiment hardware for the six crew members aboard the 
orbital laboratory, Progress 51 is scheduled to launch from the 
Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan at 6:12 a.m. (4:12 p.m. Kazakh 
time) Wednesday, April 24. NASA TV coverage of the launch will begin 
at 6 a.m. 

Progress 51 will take two days to catch up and rendezvous with the 
space station. It is scheduled to dock at 8:27 a.m. Friday, April 26. 
NASA TV coverage will begin at 7:45 a.m. 

For NASA TV schedule and video streaming information, visit: 

http://www.nasa.gov/ntv 

For information on the International Space Station, visit: 

http://www.nasa.gov/station 


-end-

__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD - Ebay sales ending soon (Fukang and 0.54g shergottite no reserve, Ung-Ataxite Main Mass, Buzzard Coulee endcut and more...)

2013-04-09 Thread Fabien Kuntz
Hello, 



this week 96 item on ebay... 


A Buzzard Coulee crusted endcut, a nice thin etched Fukang, a martian meteorite 
(0.54g) without reserve price, a 16.58g Tatahouine, a specimen of Nuvvuagittuq 
paragneiss (4.28Ga, oldest terrestrial rock).

And the etched main mass, as an oriented endcut, of the ungrouped iron 
(silicated ataxite, cobalt-rich) NWA 6167. 


Etched sections 
show an ataxitic texture. Under high magnification the metal shows a 
very fine (1-5 µm) intergrowth of kamacite and taenite arranged into a 
micro-Widmanstätten pattern. Low reserve price : 



http://www.ebay.com/sch/wwmeteorites-25/m.html?_dmd=1_ipg=50_sop=12_rdc=1


Fabien

__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Cutting

2013-04-09 Thread Steve Witt
 Greetings Listoids,

I'm looking for someone to cut some impact breccia and some meteorites for me. 
Please contact me off list.

thanks,
Steve



Steve Witt
IMCA #9020
http://imca.cc/
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list