Re: [Mikrotik Users] upgrade old CISCO to MikroTik

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Mikrotik doesn't do proprietary Cisco protocols.  What do you need out of
the switches?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Jan 20, 2020, 9:55 AM David Funderburk via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> We are hoping to assist a company that has some very old CISCO 7206s
> (core) move to (hopefully) MikroTik. Issue our techs are most concerned
> with is that the existing CISCO configs use some proprietary CISCO
> protocols.  The routers on the core "talk to" some old CISCO switches  on
> remote sites. Any suggestions?
>
> TIA
> --
> Regards,
>
> David Funderburk
> GlobalVision
> 864-569-0703
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> *E.F.A. Project* , and is believed to be
> clean.
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] RB2011UiAS Performance Tuning

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Wouldn't that just be broadcast traffic?

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019, 7:47 PM Mike Francis 
wrote:

> I'm telling you, Fastpath is what you want.
>
> https://mikrotik.com/product/RB2011UiAS-2HnD-IN#fndtn-testresults
>
> John Michael Francis
> Entrepreneur & CEO
> JMF | WAVEFLY | DLI
> Main: +1-877-WAVEFLY
> Support: supp...@wavefly.com
> Direct: +1-251-517-5069
>
> --
> *From:* Josh Luthman 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 10, 2019 7:33:01 PM
> *To:* Mike Francis; Mikrotik Users
> *Cc:* Nick Bright
> *Subject:* Re: [Mikrotik Users] RB2011UiAS Performance Tuning
>
> Fast track.  Path is for switching.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019, 7:16 PM Mike Francis via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> You need fastpath.  You have to disable all rules for that to happen.
>> That's not a problem,  especially if this is just a router. Make sure you
>> specific allowed subnets for your ssh and win box services under UP
>> Services. Get rid of all rules. Go to IP Settings and make sure it has
>> enabled fastpath.  If not then you missed something.
>>
>> John Michael Francis
>> Entrepreneur & CEO
>> JMF | WAVEFLY | DLI
>> Main: +1-877-WAVEFLY
>> Support: supp...@wavefly.com
>> Direct: +1-251-517-5069
>>
>> --
>> *From:* mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org <
>> mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org> on behalf of Nick Bright via
>> Mikrotik-users 
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 10, 2019 7:03:09 PM
>> *To:* Mikrotik Users
>> *Subject:* [Mikrotik Users] RB2011UiAS Performance Tuning
>>
>>
>> Had a CCR1009 get blown by lightning today. The only thing I had with an
>> SFP to swap in its place was an RB2011UiAS.
>>
>> Typically running peak of about 500Mbps in traffic in the evenings.
>>
>> I have disabled the LCD, turned off connection tracking, disabled all
>> mangle rules, and disabled as many filter rules as possible without
>> compromising security (3 simple port filter rules remain). All services are
>> disabled except SSH and Winbox for management. No NAT rules are enabled
>> (some are configured, but they are disabled).
>>
>> BGP is in use with one peer, receiving only a default route by filter
>> (peer sends all routes, but I'm filtered for only default).
>>
>> The only interfaces in use are ether1, ether5 and sfp1. All are routed
>> (no switch or bridges configured). Each interface, except sfp1, has one
>> VLAN for telemetry management.
>>
>> I'm still seeing 70-100% cpu usage at only around 150Mbps (13kpps) with 
>> *nearly
>> *all traffic falling in to Fast Path on 6.43.16 with the CPU set to
>> 750MHz.
>>
>> Have I missed any performance tuning options? I just need it to work half
>> way decent for the night, I have a new CCR1009 on the way.
>>
>> --
>> ---
>> -  Nick Bright-
>> -  Vice President of Technology   -
>> -  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
>> -  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
>> -  Web http://www.valnet.net/ 
>> 
>>  -
>> ---
>> - Are your files safe?-
>> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
>> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
>> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault 
>> 
>>  -
>> ---
>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>> 
>>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] RB2011UiAS Performance Tuning

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Not sure but I think NO tracking is least CPU consumption, then fast track,
then regular whatever.  So that makes sense it would jump to 100.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019, 7:41 PM Nick Bright  wrote:

> On 7/10/2019 6:33 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> > Fast track.  Path is for switching.
>
> Do you have any configuration suggestions?
>
> I tried the configuration example from
> https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/Fasttrack and all it did was
> nail my CPU to the ceiling (100%).
>
> --
> ---
> -  Nick Bright-
> -  Vice President of Technology   -
> -  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
> -  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
> -  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
> ---
> - Are your files safe?-
> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
> ---
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] RB2011UiAS Performance Tuning

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Well hopefully you don't need it, but are you close to an operator or
distributor for a better response time?

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019, 7:37 PM Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> I have a replacement coming overnight already, yes.
>
> RB2011 shows 87MB available RAM.
>
> On 7/10/2019 6:33 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> Do you have available memory?  Can you get a CCR same day or tomorrow?
> Where are you?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019, 7:04 PM Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> Had a CCR1009 get blown by lightning today. The only thing I had with an
>> SFP to swap in its place was an RB2011UiAS.
>>
>> Typically running peak of about 500Mbps in traffic in the evenings.
>>
>> I have disabled the LCD, turned off connection tracking, disabled all
>> mangle rules, and disabled as many filter rules as possible without
>> compromising security (3 simple port filter rules remain). All services are
>> disabled except SSH and Winbox for management. No NAT rules are enabled
>> (some are configured, but they are disabled).
>>
>> BGP is in use with one peer, receiving only a default route by filter
>> (peer sends all routes, but I'm filtered for only default).
>>
>> The only interfaces in use are ether1, ether5 and sfp1. All are routed
>> (no switch or bridges configured). Each interface, except sfp1, has one
>> VLAN for telemetry management.
>>
>> I'm still seeing 70-100% cpu usage at only around 150Mbps (13kpps) with 
>> *nearly
>> *all traffic falling in to Fast Path on 6.43.16 with the CPU set to
>> 750MHz.
>>
>> Have I missed any performance tuning options? I just need it to work half
>> way decent for the night, I have a new CCR1009 on the way.
>>
>> --
>> ---
>> -  Nick Bright-
>> -  Vice President of Technology   -
>> -  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
>> -  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
>> -  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
>> ---
>> - Are your files safe?-
>> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
>> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
>> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
>> ---
>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>
> --
> ---
> -  Nick Bright-
> -  Vice President of Technology   -
> -  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
> -  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
> -  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
> ---
> - Are your files safe?-
> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
> ---
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] RB2011UiAS Performance Tuning

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Do you have available memory?  Can you get a CCR same day or tomorrow?
Where are you?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019, 7:04 PM Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> Had a CCR1009 get blown by lightning today. The only thing I had with an
> SFP to swap in its place was an RB2011UiAS.
>
> Typically running peak of about 500Mbps in traffic in the evenings.
>
> I have disabled the LCD, turned off connection tracking, disabled all
> mangle rules, and disabled as many filter rules as possible without
> compromising security (3 simple port filter rules remain). All services are
> disabled except SSH and Winbox for management. No NAT rules are enabled
> (some are configured, but they are disabled).
>
> BGP is in use with one peer, receiving only a default route by filter
> (peer sends all routes, but I'm filtered for only default).
>
> The only interfaces in use are ether1, ether5 and sfp1. All are routed (no
> switch or bridges configured). Each interface, except sfp1, has one VLAN
> for telemetry management.
>
> I'm still seeing 70-100% cpu usage at only around 150Mbps (13kpps) with 
> *nearly
> *all traffic falling in to Fast Path on 6.43.16 with the CPU set to
> 750MHz.
>
> Have I missed any performance tuning options? I just need it to work half
> way decent for the night, I have a new CCR1009 on the way.
>
> --
> ---
> -  Nick Bright-
> -  Vice President of Technology   -
> -  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
> -  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
> -  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
> ---
> - Are your files safe?-
> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
> ---
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] RB2011UiAS Performance Tuning

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Fast track.  Path is for switching.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019, 7:16 PM Mike Francis via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> You need fastpath.  You have to disable all rules for that to happen.
> That's not a problem,  especially if this is just a router. Make sure you
> specific allowed subnets for your ssh and win box services under UP
> Services. Get rid of all rules. Go to IP Settings and make sure it has
> enabled fastpath.  If not then you missed something.
>
> John Michael Francis
> Entrepreneur & CEO
> JMF | WAVEFLY | DLI
> Main: +1-877-WAVEFLY
> Support: supp...@wavefly.com
> Direct: +1-251-517-5069
>
> --
> *From:* mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
> on behalf of Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 10, 2019 7:03:09 PM
> *To:* Mikrotik Users
> *Subject:* [Mikrotik Users] RB2011UiAS Performance Tuning
>
>
> Had a CCR1009 get blown by lightning today. The only thing I had with an
> SFP to swap in its place was an RB2011UiAS.
>
> Typically running peak of about 500Mbps in traffic in the evenings.
>
> I have disabled the LCD, turned off connection tracking, disabled all
> mangle rules, and disabled as many filter rules as possible without
> compromising security (3 simple port filter rules remain). All services are
> disabled except SSH and Winbox for management. No NAT rules are enabled
> (some are configured, but they are disabled).
>
> BGP is in use with one peer, receiving only a default route by filter
> (peer sends all routes, but I'm filtered for only default).
>
> The only interfaces in use are ether1, ether5 and sfp1. All are routed (no
> switch or bridges configured). Each interface, except sfp1, has one VLAN
> for telemetry management.
>
> I'm still seeing 70-100% cpu usage at only around 150Mbps (13kpps) with 
> *nearly
> *all traffic falling in to Fast Path on 6.43.16 with the CPU set to
> 750MHz.
>
> Have I missed any performance tuning options? I just need it to work half
> way decent for the night, I have a new CCR1009 on the way.
>
> --
> ---
> -  Nick Bright-
> -  Vice President of Technology   -
> -  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
> -  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
> -  Web http://www.valnet.net/ 
> 
>  -
> ---
> - Are your files safe?-
> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault 
> 
>  -
> ---
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Bonding for availability

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

LAG if they're equal radios

OSPF if you want to do fdx

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018, 6:43 PM Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> I'm looking at a configuration to set up bonding between two Mikrotik
> routers (CCR1009 and RB2011), using two separate wireless links between
> them (external radios).
>
> I am concerned about one of the links having an issue where it stays
> linked, but stops passing traffic.
>
> Which bonding driver would be best suited to providing maximum
> availability? Bonded capacity is not required, but the links aren't the
> same speed; so I'd want to prefer the faster link if non-aggregated
> capacity is required.
>
> It seems like any method which only supports MII monitoring is out,
> because the MII link wouldn't drop (it's Ethernet to the radio); which
> rules out 802.11ad, active-backup, and balance-tlb.
>
> broadcast seems like it would be limited to the slower link, rather than
> the faster link.
>
> balance-rr states that it requires equal bandwidth links.
>
> This appears to only leave balance-xor and balance-alb. It seems like
> balance-alb is most likely the best choice.
>
> I am also unclear on how the ARP availability mechanism judges a port to
> be available. I think that I would want to assign a unique probing
> address to each port on each end of each router, and have those IP
> addresses (one per port) set in the arp-ip-targets list? This should
> allow the router to know which specific ports work, and which don't?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> ---
> -  Nick Bright-
> -  Vice President of Technology   -
> -  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
> -  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
> -  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
> ---
> - Are your files safe?-
> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
> ---
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] OSPF "locking up" between routers

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

So...uhh...this is kind of embarrassing.  I may have fixed it (OSPF just
his adjacency of 19h, previous max uptime was 12 hours).  Someone mentioned
the Ubnt backhaul versions or something so I double checked and it never
got updated.  One of the two backhauls was running 5.5 or something
ancient.  I upgraded it and everything seems to be OK now, at least we're
hitting a new record after 4 days of <12 hour uptimes.

I don't work much with multicast but I was always under the impression that
APWDS and STAWDS simply acted as a transparent bridge.  Clearly it doesn't.

Sorry for the noise and thanks for the sanity checks/making me look at the
firmware versions on the backhauls!


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Jesse Dupont via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> I would make sure spanning tree is off on the 750 sw bridge and go ahead
> and turn off Multicast Enhancement on the APs (leave Multicast Allowed as
> enabled).
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 30, 2018, at 12:52 PM, Josh Luthman 
> wrote:
>
> Multicast Data is allowed and Multicast Enhancement is Enabled on the AP.
> The STA Multicast Data is allowed by there is no option for Multicast
> Enhancement.  Should I disable the enhancement on the AP only?  I assume I
> have to enable Multicast on these links.  (FYI one is 5 GHz the other is
> 3.65 GHz - 802.11n "M" gear).
>
> There is an RB750 switch (software bridge).  L2 MTU 1598.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Jesse Dupont via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> I think it’s an LSA flooding issue, especially since it works for a while
>> then stops, then comes back. Disabling the instance as you do to fix it
>> makes the whole adjacency start over which starts with new LSAs.
>> Using a “broadcast” network type doesn’t use broadcasts to establish the
>> adjacencies, it still uses multicast. It just allows for the election of
>> the DR/BDR and more than two endpoints compared to Point-to-point network
>> type. Anyway, it’s not the issue.
>> Have you tried disabling (or enabling if it’s currently disabled)
>> Multicast Enhancement on the two UBNT links? Is there a switch between the
>> two UBNT links in the middle?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Oct 30, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>
>> In your case did you use a "hidden non used" /30 to build the eoip and
>> then put your good IPs on top of the eoip?
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Adam R Johnson 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ours was/is a /29.
>>>
>>>
>>> *ADAM JOHNSON — PRESIDENT*
>>> (815) 304-6008 | ajohn...@thewisp.net 
>>> PO BOX 460 TAMPICO,IL 61283
>>> *WWW.THEWISP.NET | * <http://www.thewisp.net/>
>>> <http://www.facebook.com/thewispnet>
>>> <http://www.twitter.com/thewispnet>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:36 AM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
>>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Between the two routers it's a /30
>>>>
>>>> Interesting thing to note...it came back up on its own over lunch.
>>>> About 11 hours of it not working (see the log previously posted).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Robert Andrews via Mikrotik-users <
>>>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So this brings up a question that we ran into, what are the netmasks
>>>>> around these links?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/30/2018 10:14 AM, Adam R Johnson via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>>>>> > Hey Josh,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Just throwing in

Re: [Mikrotik Users] OSPF "locking up" between routers

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

No, but I'm pretty sure it's a good version since it works for every other
router.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 3:33 PM Robert via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org wrote:

> Is the 3.65 gear latest firmware?
>
> On 10/30/18 12:16 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users wrote:
> > Hmm everything but a 3.65 Ubnt panel.  I could easily plug a CCR into a
> 750.
> >
> > Josh Luthman
> > Office: 937-552-2340
> > Direct: 937-552-2343
> > 1100 Wayne St
> > Suite 1337
> > Troy, OH 45373
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 3:15 PM RickG  > <mailto:rgunder...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >     Josh, Can you put this equipment on a test bench?
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 2:53 PM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users
> > mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote:
> >
> > Multicast Data is allowed and Multicast Enhancement is Enabled
> > on the AP.  The STA Multicast Data is allowed by there is no
> > option for Multicast Enhancement.  Should I disable the
> > enhancement on the AP only?  I assume I have to enable Multicast
> > on these links.  (FYI one is 5 GHz the other is 3.65 GHz -
> > 802.11n "M" gear).
> >
> > There is an RB750 switch (software bridge).  L2 MTU 1598.
> >
> >
> > Josh Luthman
> > Office: 937-552-2340
> > Direct: 937-552-2343
> > 1100 Wayne St
> > Suite 1337
> > Troy, OH 45373
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Jesse Dupont via Mikrotik-users
> > mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>>
> wrote:
> >
> > I think it’s an LSA flooding issue, especially since it
> > works for a while then stops, then comes back. Disabling the
> > instance as you do to fix it makes the whole adjacency start
> > over which starts with new LSAs.
> > Using a “broadcast” network type doesn’t use broadcasts to
> > establish the adjacencies, it still uses multicast. It just
> > allows for the election of the DR/BDR and more than two
> > endpoints compared to Point-to-point network type. Anyway,
> > it’s not the issue.
> > Have you tried disabling (or enabling if it’s currently
> > disabled) Multicast Enhancement on the two UBNT links? Is
> > there a switch between the two UBNT links in the middle?
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On Oct 30, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Josh Luthman via
> > Mikrotik-users  > <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote:
> >
> >> In your case did you use a "hidden non used" /30 to build
> >> the eoip and then put your good IPs on top of the eoip?
> >>
> >>
> >> Josh Luthman
> >> Office: 937-552-2340
> >> Direct: 937-552-2343
> >> 1100 Wayne St
> >> Suite 1337
> >> Troy, OH 45373
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Adam R Johnson
> >> mailto:ajohn...@thewisp.net>> wrote:
> >>
> >>     Ours was/is a /29.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> *ADAM JOHNSON — PRESIDENT*
> >> (815) 304-6008 | ajohn...@thewisp.net
> >> <mailto:ajohn...@thewisp.net>
> >> PO BOX 460 TAMPICO,IL 61283
> >> *WWW.THEWISP.NET | *
> >> <http://www.thewisp.net/><
> http://www.facebook.com/thewispnet>
> >> <http://www.twitter.com/thewispnet>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:36 AM Josh Luthman via
> >> Mikrotik-users  >> <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Between the two routers it's a /30
> >>
> >> Interesting thing to note...it came back up on its
> >> own over lunch.  About 11 hours of it not working
> >> (see the log previously posted).
> >>
> >>
> >> Josh Luthman
> >> Office: 937-552-2340
> >> Dir

Re: [Mikrotik Users] OSPF "locking up" between routers

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Hmm everything but a 3.65 Ubnt panel.  I could easily plug a CCR into a 750.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 3:15 PM RickG  Josh, Can you put this equipment on a test bench?
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 2:53 PM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> Multicast Data is allowed and Multicast Enhancement is Enabled on the
>> AP.  The STA Multicast Data is allowed by there is no option for Multicast
>> Enhancement.  Should I disable the enhancement on the AP only?  I assume I
>> have to enable Multicast on these links.  (FYI one is 5 GHz the other is
>> 3.65 GHz - 802.11n "M" gear).
>>
>> There is an RB750 switch (software bridge).  L2 MTU 1598.
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Jesse Dupont via Mikrotik-users <
>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I think it’s an LSA flooding issue, especially since it works for a
>>> while then stops, then comes back. Disabling the instance as you do to fix
>>> it makes the whole adjacency start over which starts with new LSAs.
>>> Using a “broadcast” network type doesn’t use broadcasts to establish the
>>> adjacencies, it still uses multicast. It just allows for the election of
>>> the DR/BDR and more than two endpoints compared to Point-to-point network
>>> type. Anyway, it’s not the issue.
>>> Have you tried disabling (or enabling if it’s currently disabled)
>>> Multicast Enhancement on the two UBNT links? Is there a switch between the
>>> two UBNT links in the middle?
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Oct 30, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
>>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> In your case did you use a "hidden non used" /30 to build the eoip and
>>> then put your good IPs on top of the eoip?
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Adam R Johnson 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ours was/is a /29.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *ADAM JOHNSON — PRESIDENT*
>>>> (815) 304-6008 | ajohn...@thewisp.net 
>>>> PO BOX 460 TAMPICO,IL 61283
>>>> *WWW.THEWISP.NET | * <http://www.thewisp.net/>
>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/thewispnet>
>>>> <http://www.twitter.com/thewispnet>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:36 AM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
>>>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Between the two routers it's a /30
>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting thing to note...it came back up on its own over lunch.
>>>>> About 11 hours of it not working (see the log previously posted).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Robert Andrews via Mikrotik-users <
>>>>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So this brings up a question that we ran into, what are the netmasks
>>>>>> around these links?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/30/2018 10:14 AM, Adam R Johnson via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>>>>>> > Hey Josh,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Just throwing in my 2 cents here. We have a very similar situation.
>>>>>> What
>>>>>> > was once a powercode bmu, is now a rb3011 connected to an
>>>>>> AF24<>AF24
>>>>>> > then another rb3011. The 3011s will not complete adjacency, where
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> > bmu and 3011 did originally. Our OSPF setup is PtP

Re: [Mikrotik Users] OSPF "locking up" between routers

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Between the two routers it's a /30

Interesting thing to note...it came back up on its own over lunch.  About
11 hours of it not working (see the log previously posted).


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Robert Andrews via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> So this brings up a question that we ran into, what are the netmasks
> around these links?
>
> On 10/30/2018 10:14 AM, Adam R Johnson via Mikrotik-users wrote:
> > Hey Josh,
> >
> > Just throwing in my 2 cents here. We have a very similar situation. What
> > was once a powercode bmu, is now a rb3011 connected to an AF24<>AF24
> > then another rb3011. The 3011s will not complete adjacency, where the
> > bmu and 3011 did originally. Our OSPF setup is PtP in these scenarios.
> > We have this setup in 2 separate locations on our network, and each has
> > the same problem. Our 'stab in the dark' fix was adding a secondary and
> > temporary 192.168.x.x/24 on the segment, and it created adjacency and
> > ran without error. We did the same for the second instance with the same
> > result.
> >
> > We revisited the issue, to try to resolve a week or so later, but was
> > unable to find the cause or solution in the time we had. Given that it
> > was working without error, albeit slightly messy, we have left it in
> > place with more important things to tackle. It has been like this for
> > about 8 months now.
> >
> > Im not necessarily advocating this as a fix, but it is a workaround that
> > may provide further information to lead to the issues cause, and imho is
> > a bit nicer than an EoIP tunnel.
> >
> > Cheers!
> >
> > *ADAM JOHNSON — PRESIDENT*
> > (815) 304-6008 | ajohn...@thewisp.net <mailto:ajohn...@thewisp.net>
> > PO BOX 460 TAMPICO,IL 61283
> > *WWW.THEWISP.NET | *
> > <http://www.thewisp.net/><http://www.facebook.com/thewispnet>
> > <http://www.twitter.com/thewispnet>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 8:37 AM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users
> > mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote:
> >
> > CCR goes through two Ubnt wireless links before hitting the RB750.
> >
> > On the CCR1009 it is ether4 - not a combo port, not switched.
> >
> >
> > Josh Luthman
> > Office: 937-552-2340
> > Direct: 937-552-2343
> > 1100 Wayne St
> > Suite 1337
> > Troy, OH 45373
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Scott  > <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org>> wrote:
> >
> > On 2018/10/30 09:24, Josh Luthman wrote:
> >
> > There are two Ubnt backhauls between them.
> >
> >
> > With recent firmware it shouldn't be a big deal to run
> > broadcast.  I always run Point-to-point over wireless links with
> > exactly two endpoints.  A lot of that is leftover from when most
> > 802.11 based wireless links had issues with broadcast.
> >
> > What connects the two backhauls?  Crossover cable?  Switch,
> > smart or dumb, brand?
> >
> > Which interface are you using on the 1009?  Is it a combo port?
> > Is it in the switch group?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Scott Lambert  KC5MLE Unix
> > SysAdmin
> > lamb...@lambertfam.org <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org>
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] OSPF "locking up" between routers

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

CCR goes through two Ubnt wireless links before hitting the RB750.

On the CCR1009 it is ether4 - not a combo port, not switched.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Scott  wrote:

> On 2018/10/30 09:24, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
>> There are two Ubnt backhauls between them.
>>
>>
> With recent firmware it shouldn't be a big deal to run broadcast.  I
> always run Point-to-point over wireless links with exactly two endpoints.
> A lot of that is leftover from when most 802.11 based wireless links had
> issues with broadcast.
>
> What connects the two backhauls?  Crossover cable?  Switch, smart or dumb,
> brand?
>
> Which interface are you using on the 1009?  Is it a combo port?  Is it in
> the switch group?
>
>
>
>
> --
> Scott Lambert  KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
> lamb...@lambertfam.org
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] OSPF "locking up" between routers

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

>This part make me ask if your OSPF router-id IP is on a loopback type
interface

10.255.0.14 is the loopback IP on the bridge/loopback interface.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Scott  wrote:

> On 2018/10/30 09:05, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>
>> .122 is the remote router that's having issues sticking together with
>> OSPF.  I got some debug log that can hopefully spark some ideas.
>>
>> Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug LSA Update received: Installing and
>> flooding it
>> Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug header=Router LSA
>> id=10.255.0.14 originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x8000221a
>> Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug Installing an LSA
>> Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug lsa=Router LSA id=10.255.0.14
>> originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x8000221a
>> Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug old=Router LSA id=10.255.0.14
>> originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x80002219
>> Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug Flooding an LSA
>> Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug lsa=Router LSA id=10.255.0.14
>> originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x8000221a
>> Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug area=backbone
>> Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug Adding to neighbor's retransmit list
>> Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug lsa=Router LSA id=10.255.0.14
>> originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x8000221a
>> Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug neighbor=10.255.0.1
>> Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug number of retransmits=2
>> Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug Deleting an LSA
>> Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug lsa=Router LSA id=10.255.0.14
>> originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x80002219
>>
>
>
>  This part make me ask if your OSPF router-id IP is on a loopback type
> interface, bridge with no other interfaces, or could it be on an interface
> which could possibly bounce?  Even if it's not on the interface which is
> involved in the link between the two routers.
>
> Tunneling OSPF over EoIP was usually to get around wireless device's not
> passing broadcast traffic properly, PtP or NBMA network types would usually
> fix that, or to keep OSPF from noticing a short interface down/up cycle.  I
> have never had to resort to using a tunnel to keep OSPF happy.  I have used
> OSPF over tunnels, but not for reliability reasons.
>
>
> --
> Scott Lambert  KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
> lamb...@lambertfam.org
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] OSPF "locking up" between routers

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Would a bad wireless link cause it to fail after time and then never repair
itself?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Tommy Adams  wrote:

> Verify your time on the routers is the same. We sync to the national pool.
>
> Are these connected via a wireless link?  If so try using Point to Point.
> It is much more forgiving.
>
>
> 
> Tommy A.
> Digitex.com
>
> 817.558.6230 V
> 817.558.1204 F
>
> On Oct 30, 2018, at 10:05 AM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
> Yuck, really hoping to avoid any messy config like that =(
>
> .122 is the remote router that's having issues sticking together with
> OSPF.  I got some debug log that can hopefully spark some ideas.
>
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:21 route,ospf,info OSPFv2 neighbor 10.255.0.14: state
> change from Exchange to 2-Way
>
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug Deleting an LSA
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug lsa=Network LSA
> id=192.149.254.122 originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x8370
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug Should form adjacency: yes, I am
> DR/BDR
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug remoteID=10.255.0.14
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug Starting Database Description
> exchanges
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug neighbor=10.255.0.14
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug SEND: Database Description
> 192.149.254.121 -> 192.149.254.122 on ether4
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug OSPFv2 neighbor 10.255.0.14: state
> change from 2-Way to ExStart
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug RECV: Database Description <-
> 192.149.254.122 on ether4 (192.149.254.121)
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug OSPFv2 neighbor 10.255.0.14: state
> change from ExStart to Exchange
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug SEND: Database Description
> 192.149.254.121 -> 192.149.254.122 on ether4
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug RECV: Link State Request <-
> 192.149.254.122 on ether4 (192.149.254.121)
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug Received Link State Request
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug type=Network LSA
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug id=192.149.254.122
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug originator=10.255.0.14
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug SEND: Link State Update
> 192.149.254.121 -> 192.149.254.122 on ether4
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug RECV: Database Description <-
> 192.149.254.122 on ether4 (192.149.254.121)
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug SEND: Link State Request
> 192.149.254.121 -> 192.149.254.122 on ether4
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug SEND: Database Description
> 192.149.254.121 -> 192.149.254.122 on ether4
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug RECV: Database Description <-
> 192.149.254.122 on ether4 (192.149.254.121)
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug Retransmitting last Database
> Description packet
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug to=192.149.254.122
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug SEND: Database Description
> 192.149.254.121 -> 192.149.254.122 on ether4
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug RECV: Link State Update <-
> 192.149.254.122 on ether4 (192.149.254.121)
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug LSA Update received: Installing and
> flooding it
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug header=Network LSA
> id=192.149.254.122 originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x8371
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug Installing an LSA
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug lsa=Network LSA
> id=192.149.254.122 originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x8371
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug old=Network LSA
> id=192.149.254.122 originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x8371
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug Flooding an LSA
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug lsa=Network LSA
> id=192.149.254.122 originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x8371
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug area=backbone
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug Adding to neighbor's retransmit list
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug lsa=Network LSA
> id=192.149.254.122 originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x8371
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug neighbor=10.255.0.1
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug number of retransmits=1
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug Deleting an LSA
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug lsa=Network LSA
> id=192.149.254.122 originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x8371
>
> Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug RECV: Link State Update <-
> 192.149.254.122 on ether4 (192.149.254.121)
> Oct/30/2018 

Re: [Mikrotik Users] OSPF "locking up" between routers

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

This is a new setup.  The CCR is new.  Previously it was static routes and
a Powercode BMU.

Both OSPF interfaces are broadcast.

There are two Ubnt backhauls between them.

Eth link is stable on both, at least there are no log entries or eth errors.

Same ROS/firmware - 6.43.4

Same NTP server primary/secondary, both seem to be the exact same time.

It's not a reused loopback based on it working with the other router
(Powercode BMU) and I can't see it anywhere else ever in ospf debug log or
the routing table.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Scott  wrote:

> Is this a new setup which has not previously been functioning properly on
> prior versions of RouterOS?
>
> What OSPF network type are you using?  Is it the same on both sides?  In
> the past RouterOS's OSPF would "work" with PtP on one side and broadcast on
> the other side, until it didn't.
>
> Is there an ethernet cable in between or is it a wireless link?
>
> Is there any chance the ethernet link is bouncing on one end or the other?
>
> Is the RouterBoard firmware updated on both ends?
>
> Did you confirm that both units are using the same NTP server?  As long as
> there are no log messages saying that the time has changed, you're probably
> fine.
>
> Double check that you haven't accidentally re-used a loopback IP from
> elsewhere on the network.  That would probably leave tracks in the logs
> that you would have seen, so it's unlikely.
>
>
> On 2018/10/30 08:33, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>
>> I have an rb750 and CCR1009 both with 6.34.4 and their latest firmware.
>> They'll match right up and then after 6-12 hours they refuse to talk OSPF.
>> Once it "locks up" I'll get this constantly:
>>
>> 10:07:24 route,ospf,info OSPFv2 neighbor 10.255.0.14 <http://10.255.0.14>:
>> state change from Exchange to 2-Way
>> 10:08:05 route,ospf,info OSPFv2 neighbor 10.255.0.14 <http://10.255.0.14>:
>> state change from Exchange to 2-Way
>> 10:08:05 route,ospf,info Ignoring Link State Acknowledgment packet: wrong
>> peer state
>> 10:08:05 route,ospf,info state=ExStart
>> 10:08:46 route,ospf,info OSPFv2 neighbor 10.255.0.14 <http://10.255.0.14>:
>> state change from Exchange to 2-Way
>> 10:09:27 route,ospf,info OSPFv2 neighbor 10.255.0.14 <http://10.255.0.14>:
>> state change from Exchange to 2-Way
>>
>> Now if I go to the 10.255.0.14 router (this is a management address, the
>> OSPF network is public space) and simply disable and enable the OSPF
>> network, it comes right back - again for 6-12 hours.
>>
>> Any ideas or suggestions?
>>
>
>
> --
> Scott Lambert  KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
> lamb...@lambertfam.org
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] OSPF "locking up" between routers

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

spf,debug SEND: Database Description
192.149.254.121 -> 192.149.254.122 on ether4
Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug Deleting an LSA
Oct/30/2018 10:59:22 route,ospf,debug lsa=Router LSA id=10.255.0.14
originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x80002218


Oct/30/2018 10:59:23 route,ospf,debug RECV: Link State Update <-
192.149.254.122 on ether4 (192.149.254.121)
Oct/30/2018 10:59:23 route,ospf,debug LSA Update received: Installing and
flooding it
Oct/30/2018 10:59:23 route,ospf,debug header=Network LSA
id=192.149.254.122 originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x8372
Oct/30/2018 10:59:23 route,ospf,debug Installing an LSA
Oct/30/2018 10:59:23 route,ospf,debug lsa=Network LSA
id=192.149.254.122 originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x8372
Oct/30/2018 10:59:23 route,ospf,debug old=Network LSA
id=192.149.254.122 originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x8371
Oct/30/2018 10:59:23 route,ospf,debug Flooding an LSA
Oct/30/2018 10:59:23 route,ospf,debug lsa=Network LSA
id=192.149.254.122 originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x8372
Oct/30/2018 10:59:23 route,ospf,debug area=backbone


Oct/30/2018 10:59:23 route,ospf,debug SEND: Link State Acknowledgement
192.149.254.121 -> 224.0.0.5 on ether4
O
Oct/30/2018 10:59:23 route,ospf,debug SEND: Hello 192.149.254.121 ->
224.0.0.5 on ether4

Oct/30/2018 10:59:24 route,ospf,debug Recalculating all OSPFv2 intra-area
routes
Oct/30/2018 10:59:24 route,ospf,debug Recalculating all inter-area routes
Oct/30/2018 10:59:24 route,ospf,debug summary-area=backbone
Oct/30/2018 10:59:24 route,ospf,debug Recalculating AS-external routes
Oct/30/2018 10:59:25 route,ospf,debug RECV: Hello <- 192.149.254.122 on
ether4 (192.149.254.121)
Oct/30/2018 10:59:25 route,ospf,debug   received options: E

Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug RECV: Link State Update <-
192.149.254.122 on ether4 (192.149.254.121)
Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug LSA Update received: Installing and
flooding it
Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug header=Router LSA id=10.255.0.14
originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x8000221a
Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug Installing an LSA
Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug lsa=Router LSA id=10.255.0.14
originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x8000221a
Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug old=Router LSA id=10.255.0.14
originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x80002219
Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug Flooding an LSA
Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug lsa=Router LSA id=10.255.0.14
originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x8000221a
Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug area=backbone
Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug Adding to neighbor's retransmit list
Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug lsa=Router LSA id=10.255.0.14
originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x8000221a
Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug neighbor=10.255.0.1
Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug number of retransmits=2
Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug Deleting an LSA
Oct/30/2018 10:59:27 route,ospf,debug lsa=Router LSA id=10.255.0.14
originator=10.255.0.14 seqnum=0x80002219


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Tim Cailloux 
wrote:

> This sounds familiar(ish) I think I “fixed it” by setting up an EoIP
> tunnel and running OSPF inside.
>
> Tim
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:40 AM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> Both routers are using the NTP server here in the office (private
>> address) and the Tock public server as a secondary.
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>> Suite 1337
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Robert via Mikrotik-users <
>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>
>>> time server sync?
>>>
>>> On 10/30/18 7:33 AM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>>> > I have an rb750 and CCR1009 both with 6.34.4 and their latest
>>> firmware.
>>> > They'll match right up and then after 6-12 hours they refuse to talk
>>> > OSPF.  Once it "locks up" I'll get this constantly:
>>> >
>>> > 10:07:24 route,ospf,info OSPFv2 neighbor 10.255.0.14
>>> > <http://10.255.0.14>: state change from Exchange to 2-Way
>>> > 10:08:05 route,ospf,info OSPFv2 neighbor 10.255.0.14
>>> > <http://10.255.0.14>: state change from Exchange to 2-Way
>>> > 10:08:05 route,ospf,info Ignoring Link State Acknowledgment packet:
>>> > wro

Re: [Mikrotik Users] OSPF "locking up" between routers

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Both routers are using the NTP server here in the office (private address)
and the Tock public server as a secondary.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Robert via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> time server sync?
>
> On 10/30/18 7:33 AM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users wrote:
> > I have an rb750 and CCR1009 both with 6.34.4 and their latest firmware.
> > They'll match right up and then after 6-12 hours they refuse to talk
> > OSPF.  Once it "locks up" I'll get this constantly:
> >
> > 10:07:24 route,ospf,info OSPFv2 neighbor 10.255.0.14
> > <http://10.255.0.14>: state change from Exchange to 2-Way
> > 10:08:05 route,ospf,info OSPFv2 neighbor 10.255.0.14
> > <http://10.255.0.14>: state change from Exchange to 2-Way
> > 10:08:05 route,ospf,info Ignoring Link State Acknowledgment packet:
> > wrong peer state
> > 10:08:05 route,ospf,info state=ExStart
> > 10:08:46 route,ospf,info OSPFv2 neighbor 10.255.0.14
> > <http://10.255.0.14>: state change from Exchange to 2-Way
> > 10:09:27 route,ospf,info OSPFv2 neighbor 10.255.0.14
> > <http://10.255.0.14>: state change from Exchange to 2-Way
> >
> > Now if I go to the 10.255.0.14 router (this is a management address, the
> > OSPF network is public space) and simply disable and enable the OSPF
> > network, it comes right back - again for 6-12 hours.
> >
> > Any ideas or suggestions?
> >
> > Josh Luthman
> > Office: 937-552-2340
> > Direct: 937-552-2343
> > 1100 Wayne St
> > Suite 1337
> > Troy, OH 45373
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

[Mikrotik Users] OSPF "locking up" between routers

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

I have an rb750 and CCR1009 both with 6.34.4 and their latest firmware.
They'll match right up and then after 6-12 hours they refuse to talk OSPF.
Once it "locks up" I'll get this constantly:

10:07:24 route,ospf,info OSPFv2 neighbor 10.255.0.14: state change from
Exchange to 2-Way
10:08:05 route,ospf,info OSPFv2 neighbor 10.255.0.14: state change from
Exchange to 2-Way
10:08:05 route,ospf,info Ignoring Link State Acknowledgment packet: wrong
peer state
10:08:05 route,ospf,info state=ExStart
10:08:46 route,ospf,info OSPFv2 neighbor 10.255.0.14: state change from
Exchange to 2-Way
10:09:27 route,ospf,info OSPFv2 neighbor 10.255.0.14: state change from
Exchange to 2-Way

Now if I go to the 10.255.0.14 router (this is a management address, the
OSPF network is public space) and simply disable and enable the OSPF
network, it comes right back - again for 6-12 hours.

Any ideas or suggestions?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Powerbox Pro

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Thank you sir!!!  I thought I checked your site last week and it didn't
have any update.

Really love the boat shipment ETA!!!


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Brian Vargyas 
wrote:

> Josh –
>
>
>
> https://www.balticnetworks.com/mikrotik-powerbox-pro-5-
> port-weatherproof-gigabit-router-4-port-poe-w-sfp-port.html
>
>
>
> That link shows Availability 2nd week of Oct.Mikrotik has 500+ in
> stock in Latvia currently, our shipment is on the water.
>
>
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of Josh Luthman via
> Mikrotik-users 
> *Reply-To: *Josh Luthman , Mikrotik Users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
> *Date: *Monday, September 24, 2018 at 9:52 AM
> *To: *Mikrotik Users 
> *Subject: *[Mikrotik Users] Powerbox Pro
>
>
>
> Does anyone know what's going on with the shipment of these?  None of the
> disty have them or an ETA on when they'll get more.  I'm aware there was a
> fire, but it's been weeks and there's no answer as to what that officially
> did to damage things or what's going to be happening.
>
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D%0ASuite+1337+%0D%0ATroy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

[Mikrotik Users] Powerbox Pro

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Does anyone know what's going on with the shipment of these?  None of the
disty have them or an ETA on when they'll get more.  I'm aware there was a
fire, but it's been weeks and there's no answer as to what that officially
did to damage things or what's going to be happening.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Test

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Good


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:03 PM, mike.lyon--- via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> Test
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Resetting Password

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Older backup you can decrypt.

If it's just that maybe a dd and replace the user file with a copy you know
what the credentials are.

Could just stick a CD on it and install...

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018, 9:16 PM Blair Davis via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> Got some MaxxWave RouteMaxx 1200 Core 2 units I need to reset to factory
> default.
>
> Can't find or remember the passwords for them...
>
> Any jumper on these to default them without loosing the license?
>
> Other ways to default them?
>
> --
> West Michigan Wireless ISP
> Allegan, Michigan  49010
> 269-686-8648
>
> A Division of:
> Camp Communication Services, INC
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Upgrade from 6.35.x to 6.42.6

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

What differences exactly?  What's the diff say?

What does an upgrade have to do with this?  Why can't you just upgrade?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Sam Morris via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> We have a number of devices to upgrade from 6.35 to 6.42. In testing the
> upgrade in a lab, I'm finding many discrepancies in the "export" output.
>
> The steps I took were:
>
> (On the production router)  export file=prod-config
>
> - set up an identical spare router on the same RoS as the prod router,
> reset its configuration, and copy/paste the output of the export command
> from the prod router into the spare router
>
> - upgrade the spare router to 6.42.6
>
> - export the upgraded router config (export file=upgraded-spare)
>
> After this, I compare the differences between the files exported on the
> original production router (still running 6.35.x) and the upgraded spare
> router (now running 6.42.6). When doing so, I see many differences, and
> am concerned that when we upgrade the production routers that they will
> no longer work.
>
> Is there anything that may help with this? Tools, documentation, etc? Or
> with RoS automatically do the conversion of commands from the earlier
> versions to the newest version?
>
> Thanks
> Sam
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Multiple NAT targets

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Ranges I think so too but I don't think csv

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Aug 9, 2018, 1:50 PM Scott Reed via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> I am pretty sure you can do ranges (with a -) or a comma separated
> list.  Just be sure to check when you are done that it does what you want.
>
>
> On 8/9/2018 12:44, Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users wrote:
> > Is there a way to specify multiple to-address in a dst-nat rule?
> >
> > This may not even be the right way to approach the problem, but it's
> > what came to mind.
> >
> > I am trying to take my inbound syslog traffic, and send it to two
> > different syslog servers inside the firewall.
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> >
>
> --
> Scott Reed
> SBRConsulting, LLC
> Network and Wireless Consulting
> WISPA Vendor Member
> IN UMC Associate Lay Leader
> SLI Coach Trained
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Multiple NAT targets

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Talking about the dst-address?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:44 PM, Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> Is there a way to specify multiple to-address in a dst-nat rule?
>
> This may not even be the right way to approach the problem, but it's
> what came to mind.
>
> I am trying to take my inbound syslog traffic, and send it to two
> different syslog servers inside the firewall.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> --
> ---
> -  Nick Bright-
> -  Vice President of Technology   -
> -  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
> -  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
> -  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
> ---
> - Are your files safe?-
> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
> ---
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] How are you doing your MK backups?

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Unimus

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018, 6:22 AM canopy--- via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> We have a script that e-mails them to a Gmail account on a scheduled basis.
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 2:06 AM, Tommy Adams via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> We run a scheduled script which makes a backup and export. Then it FTP’s
>> the files to a server.  As the script finishes, it deletes the two files
>> off the routerboard.
>>
>> It is nice to have backups dating back a year or more so you can see how
>> something was configured or before there was a problem.
>>
>> 
>> Tommy A.
>> Digitex.com
>>
>> 817.558.6230 V
>> 817.558.1204 F
>>
>> > On Jun 29, 2018, at 1:00 AM, mike.lyon--- via Mikrotik-users <
>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > What is everyone doing for their MK backups besides having each MK
>> email a config file on a schedule?
>> >
>> > Thank You,
>> > Mike
>> > ___
>> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] VOIP QoS script for Ooma?

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

That works if you know the server info.

Ooma is probably not going to help in this situation.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Jun 15, 2018, 1:58 PM Lewis Bergman via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> I don't know if it is the right way to do it, but I mark all traffic to
> and from my VoIP server's subnet and then throw that into the highest
> priority tree queue. I should really get Dennis to take a look at it and
> make sure I am doing it right. I think I got that from some MT wiki or
> something.
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:18 AM Dave via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>  I would also prioritize the traffic which will also help with the queue.
>>
>>
>> On 06/12/2018 02:38 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>>
>> Generally VoIP is flagged with dscp 46, you could queue that.  It's no
>> guarantee, though.
>>
>> If it's just this one customer, what I would do is set a DHCP static
>> reservation to make sure it always gets the same IP.  Then do a simple
>> queue for that /32 and prioritize it.
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:35 PM, mike.lyon--- via Mikrotik-users <
>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone happen to have handy a script for an MK for QoS for Ooma/VOIP?
>>> Have a customer with an RB750 and want to limit their internet connection
>>> to make sure there is always enough bandwidth for their Ooma phones.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing 
>> listMikrotik-users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>>
>> --
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] VOIP QoS script for Ooma?

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Generally VoIP is flagged with dscp 46, you could queue that.  It's no
guarantee, though.

If it's just this one customer, what I would do is set a DHCP static
reservation to make sure it always gets the same IP.  Then do a simple
queue for that /32 and prioritize it.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:35 PM, mike.lyon--- via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> Anyone happen to have handy a script for an MK for QoS for Ooma/VOIP? Have
> a customer with an RB750 and want to limit their internet connection to
> make sure there is always enough bandwidth for their Ooma phones.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Mike
>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Wireless Wire 60 GHz bridge password

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Do you mind if I ask what you use them for?

I'm looking at using them as ptp between house and barn/garage.  We used
Nano now but this would be one kit for all cases (no concern about self
interference) and configured out of the box.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, May 1, 2018, 4:16 PM Justin Miller <jus...@vaskywire.com> wrote:

> I have a book i put them in.
>
> *Justin Miller*
>
>  VA SkyWire, LLC
>  3114 W Marshall St, Ste A
>  Richmond, VA 23230
>  Office: (804) 521-4212
>  Desk: (804) 591-0500 ext 101
>  Fax: (804) 591-1559
>  jus...@vaskywire.com
>
> On May 1, 2018, at 4:09 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
> wrote:
>
> Ahh so don't lose that damn sticker!
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2018, 4:08 PM Justin Miller <jus...@vaskywire.com> wrote:
>
>> Burned in the system.
>>
>> Personally, I net install each one with a blank default config so I don't
>> have to worry about this unless it get’s net installed again.
>>
>> *Justin Miller*
>>
>>  VA SkyWire, LLC
>>  3114 W Marshall St, Ste A
>>  Richmond, VA 23230
>>  Office: (804) 521-4212
>>  Desk: (804) 591-0500 ext 101
>>  Fax: (804) 591-1559
>>  jus...@vaskywire.com
>>
>> On May 1, 2018, at 4:07 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Is that variable declared on boot based on storage or something?
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Tue, May 1, 2018, 4:01 PM Justin Miller <jus...@vaskywire.com> wrote:
>>
>>> You can netinstall it with a config which outputs $defconfPassword.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Justin Miller*
>>>
>>>  VA SkyWire, LLC
>>>  3114 W Marshall St, Ste A
>>>  Richmond, VA 23230
>>>  Office: (804) 521-4212
>>>  Desk: (804) 591-0500 ext 101
>>>  Fax: (804) 591-1559
>>>  jus...@vaskywire.com
>>>
>>> On May 1, 2018, at 3:13 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
>>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> There's no way to recover the password without the label?
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 1, 2018, 3:02 PM Shawn C. Peppers <
>>> videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Then you can just flash it with netinstall.
>>>>
>>>> :: // Shawn Peppers
>>>> :: // DirectlinkAdmin.com <http://directlinkadmin.com/>
>>>>
>>>> > On May 1, 2018, at 1:55 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
>>>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > What happens if you lose the labels?  There's no way to get the
>>>> password.
>>>> >
>>>> > The default-configuration just has a variable but there doesn't seem
>>>> to be any variable declared in it, where does that come from?
>>>> >
>>>> > Josh Luthman
>>>> > Office: 937-552-2340
>>>> > Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>> > 1100 Wayne St
>>>> > Suite 1337
>>>> > Troy, OH 45373
>>>> > ___
>>>> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
>>>> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>>>
>>> ___
>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Wireless Wire 60 GHz bridge password

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Ahh so don't lose that damn sticker!

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, May 1, 2018, 4:08 PM Justin Miller <jus...@vaskywire.com> wrote:

> Burned in the system.
>
> Personally, I net install each one with a blank default config so I don't
> have to worry about this unless it get’s net installed again.
>
> *Justin Miller*
>
>  VA SkyWire, LLC
>  3114 W Marshall St, Ste A
>  Richmond, VA 23230
>  Office: (804) 521-4212
>  Desk: (804) 591-0500 ext 101
>  Fax: (804) 591-1559
>  jus...@vaskywire.com
>
> On May 1, 2018, at 4:07 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
> wrote:
>
> Is that variable declared on boot based on storage or something?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2018, 4:01 PM Justin Miller <jus...@vaskywire.com> wrote:
>
>> You can netinstall it with a config which outputs $defconfPassword.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Justin Miller*
>>
>>  VA SkyWire, LLC
>>  3114 W Marshall St, Ste A
>>  Richmond, VA 23230
>>  Office: (804) 521-4212
>>  Desk: (804) 591-0500 ext 101
>>  Fax: (804) 591-1559
>>  jus...@vaskywire.com
>>
>> On May 1, 2018, at 3:13 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>
>> There's no way to recover the password without the label?
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Tue, May 1, 2018, 3:02 PM Shawn C. Peppers <
>> videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Then you can just flash it with netinstall.
>>>
>>> :: // Shawn Peppers
>>> :: // DirectlinkAdmin.com <http://directlinkadmin.com/>
>>>
>>> > On May 1, 2018, at 1:55 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
>>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > What happens if you lose the labels?  There's no way to get the
>>> password.
>>> >
>>> > The default-configuration just has a variable but there doesn't seem
>>> to be any variable declared in it, where does that come from?
>>> >
>>> > Josh Luthman
>>> > Office: 937-552-2340
>>> > Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> > 1100 Wayne St
>>> > Suite 1337
>>> > Troy, OH 45373
>>> > ___
>>> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
>>> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>>
>>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Wireless Wire 60 GHz bridge password

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Is that variable declared on boot based on storage or something?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, May 1, 2018, 4:01 PM Justin Miller <jus...@vaskywire.com> wrote:

> You can netinstall it with a config which outputs $defconfPassword.
>
>
>
> *Justin Miller*
>
>  VA SkyWire, LLC
>  3114 W Marshall St, Ste A
>  Richmond, VA 23230
>  Office: (804) 521-4212
>  Desk: (804) 591-0500 ext 101
>  Fax: (804) 591-1559
>  jus...@vaskywire.com
>
> On May 1, 2018, at 3:13 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
> There's no way to recover the password without the label?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2018, 3:02 PM Shawn C. Peppers <
> videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Then you can just flash it with netinstall.
>>
>> :: // Shawn Peppers
>> :: // DirectlinkAdmin.com <http://directlinkadmin.com>
>>
>> > On May 1, 2018, at 1:55 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > What happens if you lose the labels?  There's no way to get the
>> password.
>> >
>> > The default-configuration just has a variable but there doesn't seem to
>> be any variable declared in it, where does that come from?
>> >
>> > Josh Luthman
>> > Office: 937-552-2340
>> > Direct: 937-552-2343
>> > 1100 Wayne St
>> > Suite 1337
>> > Troy, OH 45373
>> > ___
>> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

[Mikrotik Users] Wireless Wire 60 GHz bridge password

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

What happens if you lose the labels?  There's no way to get the password.

The default-configuration just has a variable but there doesn't seem to be
any variable declared in it, where does that come from?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Exploit in ROS 6.41.3/6.42rc27

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

I really hate the whole SMB package on RouterOS if I'm honest.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Lewis Bergman via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> I would hope few are using MT in that fashion.
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 1:53 PM Shawn C. Peppers via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> I have not tested this yet but
>>
>> https://www.coresecurity.com/advisories/mikrotik-routeros-
>> smb-buffer-overflow
>>
>> :: // Shawn Peppers
>> :: // DirectlinkAdmin.com
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

[Mikrotik Users] Any reason to NOT use CCR1016-12G ?

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

I'm debating on the CCR1016-12G versus CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+

With a few more cores I'm expecting ROS v7 to help it be a bit faster.  I
don't really need it, but for such a small price I'd rather not replace it
sooner rather than later.  I did want to see if there are any known issues
with the 1016 models from the group, though.

I don't need the combo or SFP+ port.  It's all ethernet for me.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Site-to-Site VPN

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

>L2TP provide any routing

Are you serious?

Sounds like you just want to make it easy to manage.  I do this from my
house to our network with PPTP and EOIP.  I have an EOIP tunnel that puts
the office network on the "wan" of my home Mikrotik that masquerades all of
my traffic as a management office IP.  Works pretty flawlessly, I can't
think of any issues I've had in the last 2-3 years doing this.

If you're looking at passing customer traffic/DHCP server/etc over the link
I would strongly suggest just putting another box at the other network,
like another Powercode BMU/Mikrotik/etc.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 9:28 AM, David McCullough via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> We are expanding into a new market, which will extend our service base.
> This new market currently has a fiber drain and we will be connecting these
> two markets onto a single network in the coming months. In the mean time we
> need to implement a site-to-site VPN so that we can monitor the new markets
> equipment, migrate to our DHCP server, etc.
>
>
>
> Both networks are utilizing MikroTik equipment. Our network is utilizing
> OSPF, while the new market just has static routes. We are looking at the
> various options to integrate the site-to-site VPN. We are thinking to
> implement L2TP. Will L2TP provide any routing? Will we need to enable GRE?
> Should we just add static routes, since it’s temporary.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> David McCullough
> d...@hcwireless.com
> Hill Country Wireless & Technology
>
> 830.225.1465 <(830)%20225-1465> (o)
> 830.309.0473 <(830)%20309-0473> (c)
>
> www.hcwireless.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Exclude one Ip from NAT Pool

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Do an accept before

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Feb 15, 2018 9:35 AM, "Shawn C. Peppers via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> Not exact on your config...but you could use the “everything else” flag on
> the source ip address in the nat rule.  If you want to just not allow the
> specific source ip address to nat out then just place the action to accept
> and make sure you place the rule itself above your other nat rules.
>
> ::://Shawn C. Peppers\\:::
>
> On Feb 15, 2018, at 8:02 AM, Kevin Melson via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
> We have 1:1 Nat setup.
> I know i can create ranges to exclude the ip address i want to but is
> there a command I could use to just exclude one IP address.
> We are having a weird NAT issue with our aircontrol server and I would
> just like to exclude it from the network to do some testing
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Kevin Melson
>
> Eagle One Wireless\PC Station
>
> 2007 Hwy 72 E
>
> Corinth, MS 38834
>
> 662-287-1722 <(662)%20287-1722>
>
> e...@e1w.com
>
> *www.e1w.com *
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

[Mikrotik Users] SwitchOS bridge SFP and eth?

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Can I software and/or hardware bridge in SwOS?  Specifically the RB260GS
?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Powerbox staggering power on ports

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Very busy script but that sure looks great!  Thanks for the link Faisal.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 1:59 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappytelecom.net>
wrote:

> Beautiful presentation at the 2013 St. Louis MUM, done by Brian Horn.
>
> I believe you will find what you are looking for
>
> https://mum.mikrotik.com//presentations/US13/horn.pdf
>
> Regards
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> http://www.snappytelecom.net
>
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <(305)%20663-5518>
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email:
> supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users" <mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
> *To: *"Mikrotik Users" <mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
> *Sent: *Tuesday, January 2, 2018 10:04:23 AM
> *Subject: *[Mikrotik Users] Powerbox staggering power on ports
>
> We have an unfortunate deal where we have a temporary solar situation.
> It's a 24vdc supply to a Powerbox which is POE to a BH and AP (Epmp and
> Nano).
> Over night of course it loses power these weeks with the lack of sun.  We
> get there in the morning and with all three things plugged in it won't boot
> right.  It looks like the Powerbox comes up but the red light for POE keeps
> blinking to the BH and AP.  We can unplug these two, then plug in the BH,
> and then the AP to solve this problem.
>
> Is there a way to do this without writing a script on RouterOS?  I'm
> thinking of shutting power off on bootup, then after 60s port 3 on, 60s
> port 4 on.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
> Suite 1337
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
> Troy, OH 45373
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Powerbox staggering power on ports

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Good idea!


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 9:17 PM, Paul Tackett <p...@latmt.com> wrote:

> I’d make sure that:
>
>
>
> *ether1-poe-in-long-cable*
>
>
>
> is set to yes/on as I’ve seen oddities with 750P deployed in such a
> fashion.
>
>
>
> *Paul Tackett, COO*
>
> 406-284-3174x105 <(406)%20284-3174>
>
> p...@latmt.com
>
> ---
>
> [image: LAT-Web-Logo-Small]
>
>
>
> *From:* mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:mikrotik-users-
> boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 2, 2018 19:14
> *To:* Nick Bright <nick.bri...@valnet.net>; Mikrotik Users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Mikrotik Users] Powerbox staggering power on ports
>
>
>
> Not sure what you mean by front and back.  It's a Powerbox.
>
>
>
> Ethernet Poe comes from Tycon.  The fat 110 psu would go into the DC
> barrel if there's 110 available.
>
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
> Suite 1337
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
> Troy, OH 45373
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>
>
>
> On Jan 2, 2018 8:55 PM, "Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users" <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
> I've had some older RB750UP units behave that way intermittently, but the
> newer versions as well as the RB960UP work well. If it's an older PowerBox
> that might be a problem, the rest of this assume it's a pretty new unit.
>
> Are you using the front (POE JR45) or rear (terminal) voltage output on
> the Tycon? The rear output should have a higher amperage capacity, so you
> could try that if you're using the RJ45 currently.
>
> Also keep in mind that the load output on the front/back is an OR value,
> not an AND value. You can have 1.5A on the back *OR* 1A on the front, but
> not both. If you've got both running, and are exceeding 1.5A, the unit is
> being overloaded (I killed a few Tycon controllers this way).
>
> It sounds like your boot up spike load for all three devices is probably
> more than 1A, but I don't know that it's more than 1.5A. I would advise
> measuring it to be sure.
>
> You may be able to move from the front to the back to get another 0.5A,
> which *might* give enough breathing room to fix the problem; since it's
> the startup spike load seems to be what's causing the issue.
>
> Another possibility might be to replace the charge controller with a
> device capable of more output. I suspect the Tycon is your problem (not
> enough output current for the startup spike). I have several RB750UP (newer
> units) and RB960UP units in the field on MeanWell AD-55B controllers, and
> they power up 3-5 units of various configurations of RocketM2/ePMP from a
> dead stop, but they put out about 2.4A @ 24v (note that the AD-55B doesn't
> include solar capabilities).
>
> On 1/2/2018 9:04 AM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>
> We have an unfortunate deal where we have a temporary solar situation.
> It's a 24vdc supply to a Powerbox which is POE to a BH and AP (Epmp and
> Nano).
>
>
>
> Over night of course it loses power these weeks with the lack of sun.  We
> get there in the morning and with all three things plugged in it won't boot
> right.  It looks like the Powerbox comes up but the red light for POE keeps
> blinking to the BH and AP.  We can unplug these two, then plug in the BH,
> and then the AP to solve this problem.
>
>
> Is there a way to do this without writing a script on RouterOS?  I'm
> thinking of shutting power off on bootup, then after 60s port 3 on, 60s
> port 4 on.
>
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
> Suite 1337
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
> Troy, OH 45373
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>
>
>
> ___
>
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users 
> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users=E,1,6YkLJ1ws9od9ODzOQ

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Powerbox staggering power on ports

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

It is pretty windy there.  How much would one cost?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Jan 2, 2018 5:03 PM, "William C Bardwell via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> Do you have consistent wind? Could you add a turbine to supplement?
>
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Brian - Winters Broadband via
> Mikrotik-users <mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> Not a good idea. If you run your batteries down to 9V, their storage
>> capacity will be significantly reduced.
>>
>>
>>
>> In addition as the voltage decreases the current increases in order to
>> provide the same amount of power. Add to that the voltage loss due to
>> resistance in the CAT5 cable feeding the router and you are not in a good
>> situation.
>>
>>
>>
>> Brian Horn
>>
>> Winters Broadband LLC
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:mikrotik-users-bounces
>> @wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Paul Tackett via Mikrotik-users
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 02, 2018 1:06 PM
>> *To:* 'Josh Luthman' <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>; 'Mikrotik Users' <
>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Mikrotik Users] Powerbox staggering power on ports
>>
>>
>>
>> How about wire direct to your batteries? The devices will prolly run at
>> 18v or less, although the batteries will take it in the shorts. But you
>> said this was a short term fix…
>>
>>
>>
>> *Paul Tackett, COO*
>>
>> 406-284-3174x105 <(406)%20284-3174>
>>
>> p...@latmt.com
>>
>> ---
>>
>> [image: LAT-Web-Logo-Small]
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:mikrotik-users-bounces
>> @wispa.org <mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org>] *On Behalf Of *Josh
>> Luthman via Mikrotik-users
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 2, 2018 13:46
>> *To:* Edward H. Winters <ewint...@ymdesign.net>; Mikrotik Users <
>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Mikrotik Users] Powerbox staggering power on ports
>>
>>
>>
>> Not an option, I don't believe.  It's a Tycon all in one (solar charger,
>> 12vdc to 24vdc)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 3:43 PM, Edward H. Winters via Mikrotik-users <
>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>
>> just increase the reconnect voltage on your LVD? give the batteries a
>> little time to get a charge.
>>
>> On 01/02/2018 12:20 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>> > Would this be relevant in my case?  The devices aren't booting (just
>> > being clear here since you said rebooting).
>> >
>> >
>> > Josh Luthman
>> > Office: 937-552-2340
>> > Direct: 937-552-2343
>> > 1100 Wayne St
>> > Suite 1337
>> > Troy, OH 45373
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:14 PM, Brian - Winters Broadband via
>> > Mikrotik-users <mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> > <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote:
>> >
>> > If you have insufficient power to power all of the connected devices
>> > the PowerBox will cycle through powering up the interfaces. The
>> > solution is to resolve the power issue, but you can stop the Power
>> > cycling by setting the "PoE Priority". Priority 0 is the highest
>> > priority. If the PowerBox goes over the available power the port
>> > with the lowest priority will be turned off first.
>> >
>> > Brian Horn
>> > Winters Broadband LLC
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org
>> > <mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org>
>> > [mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org
>> > <mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org>] On Behalf Of Paul
>> Tackett
>> > via Mikrotik-users
>> > Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2018 10:58 AM
>> > To: 'Grand Avenue Broadband' <grandav...@grandavebb.com
>> > <mailto:grandav...@grandavebb.com>>; 'Mikrotik Users'
>> > <mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>>
>> > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Powerbox stag

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Powerbox staggering power on ports

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Not an option, I don't believe.  It's a Tycon all in one (solar charger,
12vdc to 24vdc)


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 3:43 PM, Edward H. Winters via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> just increase the reconnect voltage on your LVD? give the batteries a
> little time to get a charge.
>
> On 01/02/2018 12:20 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users wrote:
> > Would this be relevant in my case?  The devices aren't booting (just
> > being clear here since you said rebooting).
> >
> >
> > Josh Luthman
> > Office: 937-552-2340
> > Direct: 937-552-2343
> > 1100 Wayne St
> > Suite 1337
> > Troy, OH 45373
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:14 PM, Brian - Winters Broadband via
> > Mikrotik-users <mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> > <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote:
> >
> > If you have insufficient power to power all of the connected devices
> > the PowerBox will cycle through powering up the interfaces. The
> > solution is to resolve the power issue, but you can stop the Power
> > cycling by setting the "PoE Priority". Priority 0 is the highest
> > priority. If the PowerBox goes over the available power the port
> > with the lowest priority will be turned off first.
> >
> > Brian Horn
> > Winters Broadband LLC
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org
> > <mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org>
> > [mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org
> > <mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org>] On Behalf Of Paul Tackett
> > via Mikrotik-users
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2018 10:58 AM
> > To: 'Grand Avenue Broadband' <grandav...@grandavebb.com
> > <mailto:grandav...@grandavebb.com>>; 'Mikrotik Users'
> > <mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>>
> > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Powerbox staggering power on ports
> >
> > Could you replace the batteries to get runtime that would last
> > through the night? Without knowing the amp hour value of the array,
> > I can't say for certain but I have several 24v solar sites that can
> > go 3-4 days without needing attention...
> >
> > Paul Tackett, COO
> > (406)284-3174x105 <tel:%28406%29284-3174x105>
> > p...@latmt.com <mailto:p...@latmt.com>
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org
> > <mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org>
> > [mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org
> > <mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org>] On Behalf Of Grand Avenue
> > Broadband via Mikrotik-users
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 11:41
> > To: Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
> > <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>>; Mikrotik Users
> > <mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>>
> > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Powerbox staggering power on ports
> >
> > I guess I don’t understand what you are asking. You say you don’t
> > want to write a script, but then you talk about timed power
> > shutoffs. What mechanism are you suggesting you would use to do that
> > other than a script?
> >
> >  > On Jan 2, 2018, at 8:04 AM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users
> > <mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote:
> >  >
> >  > We have an unfortunate deal where we have a temporary solar
> > situation.  It's a 24vdc supply to a Powerbox which is POE to a BH
> > and AP (Epmp and Nano).
> >  >
> >  > Over night of course it loses power these weeks with the lack of
> > sun.  We get there in the morning and with all three things plugged
> > in it won't boot right.  It looks like the Powerbox comes up but the
> > red light for POE keeps blinking to the BH and AP.  We can unplug
> > these two, then plug in the BH, and then the AP to solve this
> problem.
> >  >
> >  > Is there a way to do this without writing a script on RouterOS?
> > I'm thinking of shutting power off on bootup, then after 60s port 3
> > on, 60s port 4 on.
> >  >
> >  > Josh Luthman
> >  > Office: 937-552-2340 
> >  > Direct: 937-552-2343 
> >  > 1100 Wayne St
> >  >

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Powerbox staggering power on ports

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Would this be relevant in my case?  The devices aren't booting (just being
clear here since you said rebooting).


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:14 PM, Brian - Winters Broadband via
Mikrotik-users <mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> If you have insufficient power to power all of the connected devices the
> PowerBox will cycle through powering up the interfaces. The solution is to
> resolve the power issue, but you can stop the Power cycling by setting the
> "PoE Priority". Priority 0 is the highest priority. If the PowerBox goes
> over the available power the port with the lowest priority will be turned
> off first.
>
> Brian Horn
> Winters Broadband LLC
>
> -Original Message-
> From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:mikrotik-users-
> boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Paul Tackett via Mikrotik-users
> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2018 10:58 AM
> To: 'Grand Avenue Broadband' <grandav...@grandavebb.com>; 'Mikrotik
> Users' <mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Powerbox staggering power on ports
>
> Could you replace the batteries to get runtime that would last through the
> night? Without knowing the amp hour value of the array, I can't say for
> certain but I have several 24v solar sites that can go 3-4 days without
> needing attention...
>
> Paul Tackett, COO
> (406)284-3174x105
> p...@latmt.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:mikrotik-users-
> boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Grand Avenue Broadband via Mikrotik-users
> Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 11:41
> To: Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>; Mikrotik Users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Powerbox staggering power on ports
>
> I guess I don’t understand what you are asking. You say you don’t want to
> write a script, but then you talk about timed power shutoffs. What
> mechanism are you suggesting you would use to do that other than a script?
>
> > On Jan 2, 2018, at 8:04 AM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
> >
> > We have an unfortunate deal where we have a temporary solar situation.
> It's a 24vdc supply to a Powerbox which is POE to a BH and AP (Epmp and
> Nano).
> >
> > Over night of course it loses power these weeks with the lack of sun.
> We get there in the morning and with all three things plugged in it won't
> boot right.  It looks like the Powerbox comes up but the red light for POE
> keeps blinking to the BH and AP.  We can unplug these two, then plug in the
> BH, and then the AP to solve this problem.
> >
> > Is there a way to do this without writing a script on RouterOS?  I'm
> thinking of shutting power off on bootup, then after 60s port 3 on, 60s
> port 4 on.
> >
> > Josh Luthman
> > Office: 937-552-2340
> > Direct: 937-552-2343
> > 1100 Wayne St
> > Suite 1337
> > Troy, OH 45373
> > ___
> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http://lists.wispa.
> org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users=E,1,HBZESswsY5WSA5YaM-OTHgG7r_
> TfmhASlC3g2vERZpQkXMoTDS5VVtXQlh92_1ur6SmG0T7-
> p1INxbORI761Hz4CfgggNiBcsa8hulUbh4j3mXlgp7yDLhQbpb6I=1
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http://lists.wispa.
> org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users=E,1,O3qrB1FFsT1eTiAes6vIBFcWtwQKlJ
> iAmOGT8W2VSLfjT5m88499Si3lMttz0SoDw2jLZxshaBzCwaLRiIByGK-
> qQ2pIPqkMqFaq1mLPU4FvwNiffETg3Yap=1
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Powerbox staggering power on ports

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Lots of hidden features in Mikrotik, especially in weird command line
menus.  Thought I'd ask before getting into an untested script =(


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Grand Avenue Broadband <
grandav...@grandavebb.com> wrote:

> I guess I don’t understand what you are asking. You say you don’t want to
> write a script, but then you talk about timed power shutoffs. What
> mechanism are you suggesting you would use to do that other than a script?
>
> > On Jan 2, 2018, at 8:04 AM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
> >
> > We have an unfortunate deal where we have a temporary solar situation.
> It's a 24vdc supply to a Powerbox which is POE to a BH and AP (Epmp and
> Nano).
> >
> > Over night of course it loses power these weeks with the lack of sun.
> We get there in the morning and with all three things plugged in it won't
> boot right.  It looks like the Powerbox comes up but the red light for POE
> keeps blinking to the BH and AP.  We can unplug these two, then plug in the
> BH, and then the AP to solve this problem.
> >
> > Is there a way to do this without writing a script on RouterOS?  I'm
> thinking of shutting power off on bootup, then after 60s port 3 on, 60s
> port 4 on.
> >
> > Josh Luthman
> > Office: 937-552-2340
> > Direct: 937-552-2343
> > 1100 Wayne St
> > Suite 1337
> > Troy, OH 45373
> > ___
> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Powerbox staggering power on ports

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Would need to add batteries.  If that's the only resolution these customers
are going dark.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:39 AM, TJ Trout <t...@fdisturlock.com> wrote:

> Add a panel or two?
>
> On Jan 2, 2018 7:05 AM, "Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users" <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> We have an unfortunate deal where we have a temporary solar situation.
>> It's a 24vdc supply to a Powerbox which is POE to a BH and AP (Epmp and
>> Nano).
>>
>> Over night of course it loses power these weeks with the lack of sun.  We
>> get there in the morning and with all three things plugged in it won't boot
>> right.  It looks like the Powerbox comes up but the red light for POE keeps
>> blinking to the BH and AP.  We can unplug these two, then plug in the BH,
>> and then the AP to solve this problem.
>>
>> Is there a way to do this without writing a script on RouterOS?  I'm
>> thinking of shutting power off on bootup, then after 60s port 3 on, 60s
>> port 4 on.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>> Suite 1337
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

[Mikrotik Users] Powerbox staggering power on ports

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

We have an unfortunate deal where we have a temporary solar situation.
It's a 24vdc supply to a Powerbox which is POE to a BH and AP (Epmp and
Nano).

Over night of course it loses power these weeks with the lack of sun.  We
get there in the morning and with all three things plugged in it won't boot
right.  It looks like the Powerbox comes up but the red light for POE keeps
blinking to the BH and AP.  We can unplug these two, then plug in the BH,
and then the AP to solve this problem.

Is there a way to do this without writing a script on RouterOS?  I'm
thinking of shutting power off on bootup, then after 60s port 3 on, 60s
port 4 on.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Dude, howto, where?

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Devices?  Or what different IPs to scan?  Or a remote Dude server?  What is
it you're missing?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Jan Van Kort via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> My POPs have new external IP addresses, Dude of course quit.  Where do I
> tell Dude the new addresses?  PPP just has the inside secret tunnels
> listed.  I've been over every menu tab in winbox and the Dude menus I can
> find that seem related and cannot find where to point the Dude so it can
> work again.
>
> On 11/06/2017 07:47 AM, Jesse DuPont via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>
> On Dude v6.x, have to use command line from within RouterOS (either Winbox
> or SSH into it).
>
> /dude export-db backup-file="/"
>
> Then you can drag/drop the file from the router via Winbox or use FTP.
>
> *Jesse DuPont*
>
> Network Architect
> email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
> Celerity Networks LLC
>
> Celerity Broadband LLC
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
>
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
> On 11/6/17 8:29 AM, Ed Spoon via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>
> Export, then Import on new machine.
>
>
> ​
>
>
> *Ed Spoon*
> Internet Services Manager - triparish.net / cajun.net
> (CSS) Computer Sales & Services, Inc. / 985-879-3219 <(985)%20879-3219>
>
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Troy Gibson, Byhalia.net,LLC <
> t...@byhalia.net> wrote:
>
>> How do you back up the Dude To load on different computer if your
>> changing computers it runs on?
>>
>>
>>
>> Troy Gibson
>>
>> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>>
>>  Original message 
>> From: Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
>> Date: 11/6/17 9:02 AM (GMT-05:00)
>> To: "Ed Spoon - CSS, Inc." <ed.sp...@cssla.com>, Mikrotik Users <
>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Dude opening page
>>
>> When I was using it, I did a small devices/outages pane at the top and
>> the rest a network overview map.  Saved that panel and every device would
>> use that.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <%28937%29%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <%28937%29%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>> Suite 1337
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>>
>> On Nov 6, 2017 9:00 AM, "Ed Spoon via Mikrotik-users" <
>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>
>>> What Christian said. It opens to last map you had open. If another user
>>> is on, it will open to the map they have up.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Ed Spoon*
>>> Internet Services Manager - triparish.net / cajun.net
>>> (CSS) Computer Sales & Services, Inc. / 985-879-3219
>>> <%28985%29%20879-3219>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Christian Palecek via Mikrotik-users <
>>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It just opens up to the last panel you had open under the username.  If
>>>> its opening to a submap there is probably another client that is connected
>>>> with the submap open.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>>>>
>>>>  Original message 
>>>> From: Steve Barnes via Mikrotik-users <mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
>>>> Date: 11/5/17 1:39 PM (GMT-07:00)
>>>> To: Mikrotik Users <mikrotik-users@wispa.org>, Josh Luthman <
>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Dude opening page
>>>>
>>>> Yeah I don't know I understand.
>>>>
>>>> Steve Barnes
>>>> Wireless OPs manager
>>>> NLBC.com
>>>> (sent from phone)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *From:* Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, November 5, 2017 9:29:08 AM
>>>> *To:* Steve Barnes; Mikrotik Users
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Mikrotik Users] Dude opening page
>>>>
>>>> Change it to what you want and save the scene (forget the exact name,
>>>> it's like seco

Re: [Mikrotik Users] CCR routers and BGP

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Well it's painful on my x86 machine, but I've never really been a problem.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Jeremy Austin <jhaus...@gmail.com> wrote:

> RAM is a consideration.
>
> It's convergence time primarily, and route table maintenance, that will be
> considerably more rapid on x86 due to BGP being a single core process.
>
> I have heard of people happily running two full tables on CCR1016. I would
> be OK with this as long it were one of a pair of edge routers, as
> secondary, the primary being either x86 or bigger iron, depending on
> bandwidth requirements.
>
> YMMV. It's fairly easy to determine what your baseline CPU level would be
> if you do a full table peering internally for testing. I see about 40%
> under profile on a CCR1009 with a single full table. (Adds and removes
> being fairly slow… try searching the route table for a single route via the
> CLI, and you'll see how painful this is!)
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Is your preference due to stability or speed of peer turn up?  I guess I
>> should have specified - I'm running full tables (two peers).
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>> Suite 1337
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Jeremy Austin <jhaus...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If you're running multiple full tables, Mikrotik on x86 will have better
>>> performance, typically, than on a CCR. I have run full tables on as small
>>> as a CCR1009 with few issues, but prefer x86.
>>>
>>> For a few thousand routes, as in an IGP, BGP on CCR is completely fine.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
>>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I remember the CCR had a lot of issues running BGP and would crash.
>>>> I'm not worried about it takes a couple of minutes to build routes when it
>>>> first boots up.  Are the issues resolved at this point?
>>>>
>>>> I'm running an older x86 box for BGP and want to replace the Powercode
>>>> BMU (x86) with a more power efficient unit, possibly a second CCR?  Does
>>>> this sound like a good idea at this point or will I have Mikrotik
>>>> problems?  Is there something better than the CCR for these jobs?
>>>>
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jeremy Austin
>>> jhaus...@gmail.com
>>>
>>> (907) 895-2311 office
>>> (907) 803-5422 cell
>>>
>>> Heritage NetWorks <https://heritagenet.works/> - Whitestone Power &
>>> Communications - Vertical Broadband, LLC <http://verticalbroadband.com/>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jeremy Austin
> jhaus...@gmail.com
>
> (907) 895-2311 office
> (907) 803-5422 cell
>
> Heritage NetWorks <https://heritagenet.works/> - Whitestone Power &
> Communications - Vertical Broadband, LLC <http://verticalbroadband.com/>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] CCR routers and BGP

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Is your preference due to stability or speed of peer turn up?  I guess I
should have specified - I'm running full tables (two peers).


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Jeremy Austin <jhaus...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If you're running multiple full tables, Mikrotik on x86 will have better
> performance, typically, than on a CCR. I have run full tables on as small
> as a CCR1009 with few issues, but prefer x86.
>
> For a few thousand routes, as in an IGP, BGP on CCR is completely fine.
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> I remember the CCR had a lot of issues running BGP and would crash.  I'm
>> not worried about it takes a couple of minutes to build routes when it
>> first boots up.  Are the issues resolved at this point?
>>
>> I'm running an older x86 box for BGP and want to replace the Powercode
>> BMU (x86) with a more power efficient unit, possibly a second CCR?  Does
>> this sound like a good idea at this point or will I have Mikrotik
>> problems?  Is there something better than the CCR for these jobs?
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>> Suite 1337
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g>
>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jeremy Austin
> jhaus...@gmail.com
>
> (907) 895-2311 office
> (907) 803-5422 cell
>
> Heritage NetWorks <https://heritagenet.works/> - Whitestone Power &
> Communications - Vertical Broadband, LLC <http://verticalbroadband.com/>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

[Mikrotik Users] CCR routers and BGP

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

I remember the CCR had a lot of issues running BGP and would crash.  I'm
not worried about it takes a couple of minutes to build routes when it
first boots up.  Are the issues resolved at this point?

I'm running an older x86 box for BGP and want to replace the Powercode BMU
(x86) with a more power efficient unit, possibly a second CCR?  Does this
sound like a good idea at this point or will I have Mikrotik problems?  Is
there something better than the CCR for these jobs?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Dude opening page

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

When I was using it, I did a small devices/outages pane at the top and the
rest a network overview map.  Saved that panel and every device would use
that.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Nov 6, 2017 9:00 AM, "Ed Spoon via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> What Christian said. It opens to last map you had open. If another user is
> on, it will open to the map they have up.
>
>
>
>
> *Ed Spoon*
> Internet Services Manager - triparish.net / cajun.net
> (CSS) Computer Sales & Services, Inc. / 985-879-3219 <(985)%20879-3219>
>
> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Christian Palecek via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> It just opens up to the last panel you had open under the username.  If
>> its opening to a submap there is probably another client that is connected
>> with the submap open.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>>
>>  Original message 
>> From: Steve Barnes via Mikrotik-users 
>> Date: 11/5/17 1:39 PM (GMT-07:00)
>> To: Mikrotik Users , Josh Luthman <
>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Dude opening page
>>
>> Yeah I don't know I understand.
>>
>> Steve Barnes
>> Wireless OPs manager
>> NLBC.com
>> (sent from phone)
>>
>> --
>> *From:* Josh Luthman 
>> *Sent:* Sunday, November 5, 2017 9:29:08 AM
>> *To:* Steve Barnes; Mikrotik Users
>> *Subject:* Re: [Mikrotik Users] Dude opening page
>>
>> Change it to what you want and save the scene (forget the exact name,
>> it's like second or third from the bottom).
>>
>> On Nov 5, 2017 9:27 AM, "Steve Barnes via Mikrotik-users" <
>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>
>>> My copy of the dude opens to map that is a small little tower submap not
>>> the network overview map I have.  How do I set opening map?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Steve Barnes
>>>
>>> Wireless Ops Manager
>>>
>>> NLBC.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>>
>>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Dude opening page

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Create a panel that looks like what you want.

On Nov 5, 2017 3:51 PM, "Christian Palecek via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> It just opens up to the last panel you had open under the username.  If
> its opening to a submap there is probably another client that is connected
> with the submap open.
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>
>  Original message 
> From: Steve Barnes via Mikrotik-users 
> Date: 11/5/17 1:39 PM (GMT-07:00)
> To: Mikrotik Users , Josh Luthman <
> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Dude opening page
>
> Yeah I don't know I understand.
>
> Steve Barnes
> Wireless OPs manager
> NLBC.com
> (sent from phone)
>
> --
> *From:* Josh Luthman 
> *Sent:* Sunday, November 5, 2017 9:29:08 AM
> *To:* Steve Barnes; Mikrotik Users
> *Subject:* Re: [Mikrotik Users] Dude opening page
>
> Change it to what you want and save the scene (forget the exact name, it's
> like second or third from the bottom).
>
> On Nov 5, 2017 9:27 AM, "Steve Barnes via Mikrotik-users" <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> My copy of the dude opens to map that is a small little tower submap not
>> the network overview map I have.  How do I set opening map?
>>
>>
>>
>> Steve Barnes
>>
>> Wireless Ops Manager
>>
>> NLBC.com
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Dude opening page

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Change it to what you want and save the scene (forget the exact name, it's
like second or third from the bottom).

On Nov 5, 2017 9:27 AM, "Steve Barnes via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> My copy of the dude opens to map that is a small little tower submap not
> the network overview map I have.  How do I set opening map?
>
>
>
> Steve Barnes
>
> Wireless Ops Manager
>
> NLBC.com
>
>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Graphing specific traffic

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Use Mikrotik.  Create a firewall mangle to identify the traffic and a queue
to graph it.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Ethan E. Dee via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> I am looking to be able to find how much traffic is going to specific
> places i.e. google, amazon. netflix, etc. And possibly graphing that
> data as well.
>
> I use mikrotik at my core and edge.
>
> Can anyone recommend a product for this?
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned by E.F.A. Project and is believed to be
> clean.
>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Charter/spectrum wisp?

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Why would you expect them to build?  I'm sure they will lease like everyone
else.  It makes the most sense.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Sep 28, 2017 8:41 PM, "RickG via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> Jan, I appreciate the input but that doesn't answer the question: Are they
> leasing or building their own towers?
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Jan-OOLLC via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> If you watch the employment ad on tv from Spectrum, you will see a 1
>> second clip of a tech in a bucket plugging a LAN cable into a sector array.
>> jv
>>
>>
>> On 09/28/2017 09:09 AM, RickG via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>>
>> Are they leasing or building their own towers?
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Comcast is, I would expect the subsidiaries to follow.
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Jan-OOLLC via Mikrotik-users <
>>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is Spectrum getting into the wisp business?
>>>>
>>>> I saw in the short employment ad on tv a guy in a bucket plugging a POE
>>>> into what looked like some Cambium gear on a tower.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> JV
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -RickG
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing 
>> listMikrotik-users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -RickG
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Bonding Configuration

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

I think it's best to do PCC, best guide I could find was here:

https://mum.mikrotik.com/presentations/US12/steve.pdf


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Bonding_Examples
>
> I'm attempting to bond two DSL connections at a remote site, I was using
> an appliance for this but the service provider is discontinuing the
> service.
>
> Reviewing the document above, I encountered a challenge - the far side,
> being two PPPoE DSL connections, doesn't have static IP addresses.
>
> Is there a way to implement this solution such that the far side of the
> tunnel on dynamic IPs can work?
>
> For reference, the bonding will end up being between an RB2011 and
> CCR1009; both under my control (but separated by 'internet')
>
> --
> ---
> -  Nick Bright-
> -  Vice President of Technology   -
> -  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
> -  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
> -  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
> ---
> - Are your files safe?-
> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
> ---
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

[Mikrotik Users] RB750 disabled pptp client?

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

I have a remote RB750p that disabled it's pptp client, removed the dst
IP/user/password.

Any ideas why this happened?  That's the only thing that was effected - not
the ppp tunnel (for the Sprint card), eoip, etc

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] howto test ISP threshold

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

You don't set it, it's a "speed" limitation of the modem.  Hopefully that
somebody can help you and if you need any recommendations please feel free
to ask here.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Jan-OOLLC 
wrote:

> Packets per second?  Don't know where to set this.  Oh, forget it, I'll
> call somebody
>
> Jan V
>
> On 07/27/2017 07:19 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> I meant streams (not steams).
>
> When you say modem, are you talking about a cable modem perhaps?  Is it
> possible you're hitting the PPS limit on the device?
>
> When customers are doing 60 megs can you do a Speedtest and still hit 300?
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Jan-OOLLC 
> wrote:
>
>> internet seems slow from my office.  Customers call and complain about
>> videos not loading and/or start and then in a few minutes stop and
>> re-load.  Steams?  not familiar with that function or term.  speedtest does
>> not show anything serious, approx 250Mbps, even when plugged directly into
>> the modem.  Speedtest via google, Bing and speedtest.com all show about
>> the same thing.
>>
>> I recently bought an increase to the service speeds so I could compete
>> better with DSL, Exceed and Gen5.
>>
>>They have replaced my modem about 5 times, yet customers who have not
>> experienced problems before are now complaining.  I have a 300mbps service,
>> now.  I see roughly 30-60Mbps peak traffic.
>>
>> I need a means of testing for various types of traffic across the
>> threshold.
>>
>> Jan V
>>
>> On 07/27/2017 05:31 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>
>> They can't get there at all?  Steams don't start?
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <%28937%29%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <%28937%29%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Jul 27, 2017 12:59 AM, "Jan-OOLLC via Mikrotik-users" <
>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I need a simple method for testing my interface to the internet for
>>> packet loss.  Customers keep calling about hulu or netflix not working
>>> and I can't find the trouble inside my network.  It's either the main
>>> router or my ISP modem.  I am seeing an occasional etherlink gateway
>>> down message in the log.  1 or 2 times per day, but I can't see anything
>>> in the log relating to data or packet loss.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Janv
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] howto test ISP threshold

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

I meant streams (not steams).

When you say modem, are you talking about a cable modem perhaps?  Is it
possible you're hitting the PPS limit on the device?

When customers are doing 60 megs can you do a Speedtest and still hit 300?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Jan-OOLLC 
wrote:

> internet seems slow from my office.  Customers call and complain about
> videos not loading and/or start and then in a few minutes stop and
> re-load.  Steams?  not familiar with that function or term.  speedtest does
> not show anything serious, approx 250Mbps, even when plugged directly into
> the modem.  Speedtest via google, Bing and speedtest.com all show about
> the same thing.
>
> I recently bought an increase to the service speeds so I could compete
> better with DSL, Exceed and Gen5.
>
>They have replaced my modem about 5 times, yet customers who have not
> experienced problems before are now complaining.  I have a 300mbps service,
> now.  I see roughly 30-60Mbps peak traffic.
>
> I need a means of testing for various types of traffic across the
> threshold.
>
> Jan V
>
> On 07/27/2017 05:31 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> They can't get there at all?  Steams don't start?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Jul 27, 2017 12:59 AM, "Jan-OOLLC via Mikrotik-users" <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> I need a simple method for testing my interface to the internet for
>> packet loss.  Customers keep calling about hulu or netflix not working
>> and I can't find the trouble inside my network.  It's either the main
>> router or my ISP modem.  I am seeing an occasional etherlink gateway
>> down message in the log.  1 or 2 times per day, but I can't see anything
>> in the log relating to data or packet loss.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Janv
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] howto test ISP threshold

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

They can't get there at all?  Steams don't start?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Jul 27, 2017 12:59 AM, "Jan-OOLLC via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> I need a simple method for testing my interface to the internet for
> packet loss.  Customers keep calling about hulu or netflix not working
> and I can't find the trouble inside my network.  It's either the main
> router or my ISP modem.  I am seeing an occasional etherlink gateway
> down message in the log.  1 or 2 times per day, but I can't see anything
> in the log relating to data or packet loss.
>
> --
>
> Janv
>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Dude issue

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Is this 3.6 or 4.beta?  Or the newer stuff?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On May 30, 2017 8:23 PM, "Shawn C. Peppers via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> Interestingwhat did you do?  Auto purge config?
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
> Video Direct
> 866-680-8433 <(866)%20680-8433> Toll Free
> http://www.video-direct.tv
>
> On May 30, 2017, at 7:12 PM, Jason Wilson 
> wrote:
>
> I believe that is hard Drive full.  I had the same issue before.
>
>
>
> Jason Wilson
> Remotely Located
> Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places.
> 530-651-1736 <(530)%20651-1736>
> 530-748-9608 <(530)%20748-9608> Cell
> www.remotelylocated.com
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Shawn C. Peppers via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> Getting a odd message from a dude server running on a CCR.  Seem to be
>> database related, im thinking maybe the database needs repaired or
>> something
>>
>> The Dude is saying "server status: db failure: I/O error: stopped"
>>
>> Shawn C. Peppers
>> Video Direct
>> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] PPTP/EOIP tunnels break until reboot

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Mine is x86 server rb750 client.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On May 30, 2017 3:37 PM, "Jesse DuPont via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> I don't have any insight other than to say we've seen this sometimes, too;
> primarily on CCR's.
>
> *Jesse DuPont*
>
> Network Architect
> email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
> Celerity Networks LLC
>
> Celerity Broadband LLC
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
>
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
> On 5/30/17 12:56 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>
> Ever since I went from v5 to v6 I've had an issue with a remote site not
> coming back up until the "server" is rebooted.  I can see the EOIP tunnels
> are "not running" with the lack of an R and the PPTP, while it will
> establish, does not pass any traffic.
>
> Disable/enable does not fix anything.  I've tried most if not all versions
> from 6.35 to 6.37.1.
>
> Does anyone have any insight to this?  Anything beyond contact Mikrotik
> support?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing 
> listMikrotik-users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] maplite

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Firewall can't stop Mac telnet

I was told off list it isn't listening on WAN though

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Apr 13, 2017 12:09 AM, "Grand Avenue Broadband" <
grandav...@grandavebb.com> wrote:

> MikroTik default configuration firewall drops EVERYTHING coming into the
> WAN port that isn't initiated from inside your network, or related to
> something that was.
>
> On Apr 12, 2017, at 7:22 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
> What about Mac telnet?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Apr 12, 2017 9:58 PM, "Daniel Peoples via Mikrotik-users" <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> All tiks drop inet side of things by default, you will need to add an
>> allow rule for your winbox port if you want wan side mgmnt.
>>
>> *Daniel Peoples*
>> Resonance Broadband
>> *Resonancebroadband.com* <http://resonancebroadband.com/>
>> 918-429-3620
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Jan Van Kort via Mikrotik-users <
>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>
>>> how to configure these from WAN side?
>>>
>>> jan v
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
> --
>   Grand Avenue Broadband -- Wireless Internet Service
>  Circle City to Wickenburg and surrounding areas
>   http://grandavebb.com
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] maplite

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

What about Mac telnet?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Apr 12, 2017 9:58 PM, "Daniel Peoples via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> All tiks drop inet side of things by default, you will need to add an
> allow rule for your winbox port if you want wan side mgmnt.
>
> *Daniel Peoples*
> Resonance Broadband
> *Resonancebroadband.com* 
> 918-429-3620
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Jan Van Kort via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> how to configure these from WAN side?
>>
>> jan v
>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Queues per user per subnet

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

That's exactly what he doesn't want, that will create 1024 queues


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Shawn C. Peppers via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> :for IPADDRS from 2 to 254 do={/queue simple add name="172.16.16.$IPADDRS" 
> target="172.16.16.$IPADDRS" max-limit="2M/9M"}
>
>
> You will have to do it a /24 at a time but it will only take a sec
>
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
> Video Direct
> 866-680-8433 <(866)%20680-8433> Toll Free
> http://www.video-direct.tv
>
> On Apr 6, 2017, at 2:35 PM, Paul McCall via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
> Is there a simple way to add queue(s) for an entire /20 without having to
> have a queue for each one?  To be clear, I'm not concerned with how to get
> that many queues in (we have a spreadsheet that makes that easy), but
> moreso not wanting to have that many queues.
>
> Looking to limit each user to a maximum of 5Mbit down / 1Mbit up with a
> 25Mb burst up/down.
>
> Paul
>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Queues per user per subnet

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Not a simple queue, no.

You could do firewall mangle or a PCQ.  Or hotspot I guess...


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Paul McCall via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> Is there a simple way to add queue(s) for an entire /20 without having to
> have a queue for each one?  To be clear, I'm not concerned with how to get
> that many queues in (we have a spreadsheet that makes that easy), but
> moreso not wanting to have that many queues.
>
> Looking to limit each user to a maximum of 5Mbit down / 1Mbit up with a
> 25Mb burst up/down.
>
> Paul
>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Cloud Core Router reboot with no log entries???

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Or hardware failure?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Judd Dare via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> This was a hard crash due to a kernel failure and the watchdog caught it.
> Power was probably fine, just a bug somewhere that caused the kernel to
> crash.  I'd take this opportunity to think about upgrading to another
> version which may have that crash fixed.
>
> Judd
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Brough Turner via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> It was not a power outage and the OSPF issues are minor (coming from a
>> separate problem).
>>
>> But your suggestion of a terminal window is a good one!
>>
>> There are two messages.  I suspect the first is true and the second one
>> is anomaly that goes along with the lack of any startup log messages.
>>
>>
>> This is the first time I've seen a kernel failure out of 7 CCRS operating
>> for 6 to 14 months.
>> ​
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Brough
>>
>> Brough Turner
>> netBlazr Inc. – Free your Broadband!
>> Mobile:  617-285-0433 <(617)%20285-0433>   Skype:  brough
>> netBlazr Inc.  | Google+
>>  | Twitter
>>  | LinkedIn
>>  | Facebook
>>  | Blog
>>  | Personal website
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Scott Reed 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Open a terminal window.  If it was a power outage, under the banner it
>>> will say something like reboot without proper shutdown.
>>>
>>> Also, the very beginning of the log after power up may have some help.
>>>
>>> The part you are showing looks like OSPF getting started.
>>>
>>> On 3/2/2017 2:11 PM, Brough Turner via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>>>
>>> At 12:24 today, one of our core routers appears to have had a brief
>>> outage. It's upstream of our monitoring server so initially everything
>>> looked like a disaster, but upon further examination, the outage lasted
>>> less than 30 seconds and the 11 VPN sessions at the monitoring server were
>>> all back up in less than 37 seconds.  Looking at the monitoring server and
>>> each of the devices upstream of the monitoring server, all had uptimes of
>>> >143 days, except the gateway router, a CCR1036.
>>>
>>> Strangely, the uptime on the CCR1036 suggests it rebooted at 12:24
>>> today, but there is nothing in its log.  How can we have a 30 second
>>> service outage and have the router's uptime reset with no log entries?  On
>>> a router reboot, we normally have dozens of log entries before the router
>>> is up, has the correct time and is behaving normally.
>>>
>>> Here's a Winbox view of date, time, uptime and the log.  Any ideas?  Am
>>> I missing something obvious?
>>>
>>>
>>> ​
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Brough
>>>
>>> Brough Turner
>>> netBlazr Inc. – Free your Broadband!
>>> Mobile:  617-285-0433 <(617)%20285-0433>   Skype:  brough
>>> netBlazr Inc.  | Google+
>>>  | Twitter
>>>  | LinkedIn
>>>  | Facebook
>>>  | Blog
>>>  | Personal website
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Mikrotik-users mailing 
>>> listMikrotik-users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] 3011 in a 2011 case

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

They've been out
https://routerboard.com/RB2011UiAS-IN


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Grand Avenue Broadband via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> 2011 desktop cases are available?? How do I get one?
>
> > On Mar 2, 2017, at 2:14 PM, Josh Baird via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
> >
> > Those of you who are buying the 3011's and sticking them in the red 2011
> desktop cases.. are you buying the entire rackmount 3011 enclosure, or just
> the board it's self?  If just the board, from where?
> >
> > I have a 2011 that is out of steam, but don't have any room in this
> enclosure for anything but the 2011 case.
> >
> > Josh
> > ___
> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Cloud Core Router reboot with no log entries???

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

What does it say /sys log expo

What happens if you do a :log info "test message"


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Brough Turner via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> I know old logs are blown away but there should be new log entries from
> the reboot and there are none!
>
> Thanks,
> Brough
>
> Brough Turner
> netBlazr Inc. – Free your Broadband!
> Mobile:  617-285-0433 <(617)%20285-0433>   Skype:  brough
> netBlazr Inc.  | Google+
>  | Twitter
>  | LinkedIn
>  | Facebook
>  | Blog
>  | Personal website
> 
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 2:15 PM, can...@believewireless.net <
> p...@believewireless.net> wrote:
>
>> Old logs are blown away on reboot. Use remote syslog to store any logs on
>> another server so you can go back and see
>> what may have happened. Also, make sure you have enough log space to
>> store what you need.
>>
>> Go to System-Logging and look under actions. You can set remote syslog
>> there and under Memory and Disk,
>> you can increase the number of lines for logging.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Brough Turner via Mikrotik-users <
>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>
>>> At 12:24 today, one of our core routers appears to have had a brief
>>> outage. It's upstream of our monitoring server so initially everything
>>> looked like a disaster, but upon further examination, the outage lasted
>>> less than 30 seconds and the 11 VPN sessions at the monitoring server were
>>> all back up in less than 37 seconds.  Looking at the monitoring server and
>>> each of the devices upstream of the monitoring server, all had uptimes of
>>> >143 days, except the gateway router, a CCR1036.
>>>
>>> Strangely, the uptime on the CCR1036 suggests it rebooted at 12:24
>>> today, but there is nothing in its log.  How can we have a 30 second
>>> service outage and have the router's uptime reset with no log entries?  On
>>> a router reboot, we normally have dozens of log entries before the router
>>> is up, has the correct time and is behaving normally.
>>>
>>> Here's a Winbox view of date, time, uptime and the log.  Any ideas?  Am
>>> I missing something obvious?
>>>
>>>
>>> ​
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Brough
>>>
>>> Brough Turner
>>> netBlazr Inc. – Free your Broadband!
>>> Mobile:  617-285-0433 <(617)%20285-0433>   Skype:  brough
>>> netBlazr Inc.  | Google+
>>>  | Twitter
>>>  | LinkedIn
>>>  | Facebook
>>>  | Blog
>>>  | Personal website
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] dual power supplies?

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Can both power sources be monitored (like utility and battery)?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mar 1, 2017 9:16 AM, "Faisal Imtiaz via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> Keep in mind that most Mikrotik (Routerboard) devices support being
> powered via POE
> Check the specs and or the device for the specific models.
>
> All of the such (Routerboard) devices can be powered via the DC power Jack
> as well as the POE-IN port at the same time, the internal circuitry of the
> Mikrotik will use the Higher voltage as primary power source, and the other
> as a secondary power source.
>
> Regards.
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "David Funderburk via Mikrotik-users" 
> > To: "Mikrotik Users" 
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 9:05:44 AM
> > Subject: [Mikrotik Users] dual power supplies?
>
> > Is there a layer 3 Mikrotik switch that has dual power supplies we can
> > use on our core? If not, is there way to adapt a Mikrotik to use dual
> > power supplies? And if the answer is no to all these, is there a switch
> > you'd recommend that functions much like a Mikrotik with dual power
> > supplies?
> >
> > David
> > ___
> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Synchronize DHCP server static assignments

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Ip DHCP server lease remove [find]

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Nov 16, 2016 12:34 PM, "Roy"  wrote:

>
>
> "clear them in the backup" doesn't seem to be a trivial task
>
> On 11/16/2016 7:07 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> Clear them in the backup and copy them all over with SSH?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Nov 16, 2016 9:05 AM, "Roy via Mikrotik-users" <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> We have a Mikrotik DHCP server where there are a lot of "static"
>> assignments of IP specific addresses to MAC addresses.
>>
>> I would like to have an automatic mechanism to copy them to the "backup"
>> DHCP server.  Does anyone have a technique for doing this?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] [WISPA Members] Can't downgrade mikrotik routeros

[Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users]

Did you click downgrade?  You don't do this like a normal update.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Sep 28, 2016 6:58 PM, "Darin Steffl"  wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> We are trying to install our normal mikrotik os version which is 6.32.4
> since we have tested and found it the most stable.
>
> The latest ccr router we received has 6.35.2 on it and we're not having
> any luck getting it to downgrade to the stable bug fix version. Some
> mikrotik forum posts say that you're not able to downgrade the software
> below what it shipped with. I find this doesn't make sense because the os
> didn't ship with the bug fix release, but rather the more unstable
> "current" version.
>
> Any advice how to downgrade when the normal procedure doesn't work? Is it
> possible to downgrade to a version lower than what the factory installed?
>
> If not, would net install work to force the version we want? The way it is
> now, there's not even a possible way to install the latest 6.34.6 bug fix
> release since it's lower than 6.35.2
>
> Any help is appreciated. Thanks
>
> --
> Darin Steffl
> Minnesota WiFi
> www.mnwifi.com
> 507-634-WiFi
>  Like us on Facebook
> 
>
>
> ___
> Members mailing list
> memb...@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/members
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users