Re: BRL-CAD now compiles on OpenBSD :-)
sorry again :-( this was supposed to goto BSD-India. on pills and drowsy --Siju On 2/9/07, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=117087499332720w=2 --Siju
Re: external usb disk freezing machine
is there a way i can get more usb diagnostics? it seems that USBVERBOSE is on by default in the kernels. i would like to get some insight into what's happening when the disk (seemingly without reasons) detaches. some more tests yesterday: i used the disk without problems for more than 3 hours in win xp, so the bios and cable seem to be ok. i also installed a feb 2 snapshot, and while at first it worked flawlessly, i fsck-d a 200G ext2 partition on it, later it started doing the same as the 4.0 kernel. i could basically disable one usb port after another just by plugging the disk in. another minor info, by the time a port gets disabled, even if no usb device is plugged in, this is what usbdevs shows: amaaq usbdevs addr 1: UHCI root hub, Intel addr 1: UHCI root hub, Intel addr 1: UHCI root hub, Intel addr 1: EHCI root hub, Intel addr 2: product 0x0900, vendor 0x1058 could a usb guru help me with this please? -f -- from the land down under: do we look umop apisdn from up over?
Re: NFS with pf on OpenBSD
Rodney Hopkins wrote: I want to run a NFS server on OpenBSD with pf enabled and configured only allow the required inbound ports needed to allow NFS mounts to work. The thing is, the only way I've successfully been able to do this is to exclude ports 1024 from being blocked inbound by pf. This is due to the fact that mountd changes the port(s) it is bound to on every reboot or restart of mountd and it always seems to bind to ports 1024. Am I missing something here? Is there a better/more restrictive way to do this? Can I force mountd to bind to specific predictable port(s) so that I can write pf rules to only open the ports needed to allow inbound NFS request/mounts? I've googled, checked the FAQs and searched the archives. I haven't found anything regarding this. I discussed this with the group mid last year. Search the archives for **How to pass mount protocol traffic (mountd/NFS) using pf* http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2006-06/1338.html. *-pachl
BGP With Private AS and IP Addresses Routing To An Internet Gateway
Anybody, If I have two internal routers, say RouterB(ext: 172.16.111.253/32 and int: 10.77.222.254/32) and RouterC(ext: 10.77.222.253/32 and int: 10.222.77.254/32), and these two routers had already established a BGP session. Now, let us say I will have Router B in BGP with RouterA(ext: Internet and 172.16.111.254/32). In all of the routers involved, I enable net.ip.forwarding=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf. Also in routerA, I enabled pf with NAT support. From Router A, I could ping the Internet. But from routerB having a BGP session with RouterA, I cannot ping the internet. And so does in RouterC. Any tips to sort this out? Regards, Demuel
Re: BGP With Private AS and IP Addresses Routing To An Internet Gateway
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 09:45:35AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anybody, If I have two internal routers, say RouterB(ext: 172.16.111.253/32 and int: 10.77.222.254/32) and RouterC(ext: 10.77.222.253/32 and int: 10.222.77.254/32), and these two routers had already established a BGP session. Now, let us say I will have Router B in BGP with RouterA(ext: Internet and 172.16.111.254/32). In all of the routers involved, I enable net.ip.forwarding=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf. Also in routerA, I enabled pf with NAT support. From Router A, I could ping the Internet. But from routerB having a BGP session with RouterA, I cannot ping the internet. And so does in RouterC. Any tips to sort this out? Have a look at bgpctl show rib. I guess all your routes on B and C are invalid because your using iBGP (same AS on all routers) and in that case the nexthops need to be redistributed via an IGP (or covered by static routes) or you could use set nexthop self to force your routers to announce their own address as nexthop. -- :wq Claudio
Re: CARP send failed due to mbuf memory error
Further info on the problem below. The past two nights the failover has happened at between 12:03am and 12:05am both nights. Looking at traffic graphs, I don't see any spikes or anomolies at all. The first time we had 4 mbuf errors, and checking today, the total is 8, so in both cases there were 4 mbuf errors and then the carp failed over. I'm still none the wiser as to why this is happening though. I'm going to setup tcpdump to run tonight at 11:55pm and see if I can capture the traffic to see if I can see any particular packet(s) causing the problem. -Matt On 8 Feb 2007, at 11:14, Matt Hamilton wrote: Hi all, Just been trying to track down why CARP keeps unexpectedly failing over to the backup (a pair of firewalls) and I noticed (OpenBSD/i386 3.9) that there have been some mbuf errors: # netstat -s -p carp carp: 98 packets received (IPv4) 0 packets received (IPv6) 0 packets discarded for bad interface 0 packets discarded for wrong TTL 0 packets shorter than header 0 discarded for bad checksums 0 discarded packets with a bad version 0 discarded because packet too short 0 discarded for bad authentication 0 discarded for bad vhid 0 discarded because of a bad address list 144221 packets sent (IPv4) 0 packets sent (IPv6) 4 send failed due to mbuf memory error I have 8192 mbufs (set by sysctl): # netstat -m 550 mbufs in use: 546 mbufs allocated to data 1 mbuf allocated to packet headers 3 mbufs allocated to socket names and addresses 546/702/8192 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) 1576 Kbytes allocated to network (78% in use) 0 requests for memory denied 0 requests for memory delayed 0 calls to protocol drain routines Any ideas? Someone suggested that the mbuf memory error counter might be incremented when pf drops a packet from a queue, however all our carp stuff has its own queue: snippets from pf.conf: # Allow CARP from other firewall pass in quick on $ext_if proto carp from $fw_ext_ips to 224.0.0.18 keep state queue fw pass in quick on $int_if proto carp from $fw_int_ips to 224.0.0.18 keep state queue fw pass out quick on $ext_if proto carp from $fw_ext_ips to 224.0.0.18 keep state queue fw pass out quick on $int_if proto carp from $fw_ext_ips to 224.0.0.18 keep state queue fw queue fw bandwidth 64Kb priority 5 cbq(borrow,red) and the output from pfctl -s queue -v: queue fw bandwidth 64Kb priority 5 cbq( red borrow ) [ pkts: 154556 bytes: 11546909 dropped pkts: 0 bytes: 0 ] [ qlength: 0/ 50 borrows: 0 suspends: 0 ] So no dropped packets there. Any ideas? -Matt -- Matt Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Netsight Internet Solutions, Ltd.Business Vision on the Internet http://www.netsight.co.uk +44 (0)117 9090901 Web Design | Zope/Plone Development Consulting | Co-location | Hosting -- Matt Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Netsight Internet Solutions, Ltd.Business Vision on the Internet http://www.netsight.co.uk +44 (0)117 9090901 Web Design | Zope/Plone Development Consulting | Co-location | Hosting
BRL-CAD now compiles on OpenBSD :-)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=117087499332720w=2 --Siju
Collection 2007
Bonjour, Afin de stimuler votre force de vente et fidiliser vos clients, Promocadeaux leader du cadeau d'entreprise en Europe, vous propose ses dernihres nouveautis : GPS, cli USB, textile publicitaire.23.000 rifirences en ligne sur www.promocadeaux.com. Dans l'attente de votre visite, Veuillez agrier, nos sinchres salutations. L'iquipe Promocadeaux92 agences en Europewww.promocadeaux.com Offre riservie exclusivement aux entreprises. Conformiment ` la Loi Informatique et Libertis parue au Journal Officiel du 6 janvier 1978, vous disposez d'un droit d'acchs, de rectification, et d'opposition aux donnies personnelles vous concernant. Pour ne plus recevoir d'informations de notre part, Cliquez ici
fd.o HAL support / OpenBSD alternative for NetworkManager
Is there any work going on to get support for the freedesktop.org HAL specification (http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fhal)? It seems that there are quite a few programs that would benefit from this. Is there a technical reason why this hasn't been implemented yet, or is the reason simply lack of developers? I realize that the port would probably be fairly difficult to make. The reason I'm asking is that on linux I can use this really wonderful program called NetworkManager which manages network connection (Who would have guessed?). Unfortunately it requires fd.o HAL so using it under OpenBSD is currently impossible. Is there any alternative for OpenBSD which supports network roaming and such? -- Stefan Parviainen
Re: fd.o HAL support / OpenBSD alternative for NetworkManager
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 05:39:46PM +0200, Stefan Parviainen wrote: Is there any work going on to get support for the freedesktop.org HAL specification (http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fhal)? It seems that Speaking only for myself, freedesktop.org HAL is a horrible, nasty thing. They had good intentions, but made bad initial assumptions. Then they went further and made bad implementation decisions. If I wanted an OS that did everything for me by taking away my choices I'd just install Windows and be done with it. After realizing that there was no simple way that I could find to disable HAL, I nuked my only remaining Linux installation. -- Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD Users Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/ http://www.stilyagin.com/darrin/ |
Re: fd.o HAL support / OpenBSD alternative for NetworkManager
There is no way in hell that this type of garbage will EVER make it in OpenBSD. Unlike Linux, OpenBSD *is* free. On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 05:39:46PM +0200, Stefan Parviainen wrote: Is there any work going on to get support for the freedesktop.org HAL specification (http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fhal)? It seems that there are quite a few programs that would benefit from this. Is there a technical reason why this hasn't been implemented yet, or is the reason simply lack of developers? I realize that the port would probably be fairly difficult to make. The reason I'm asking is that on linux I can use this really wonderful program called NetworkManager which manages network connection (Who would have guessed?). Unfortunately it requires fd.o HAL so using it under OpenBSD is currently impossible. Is there any alternative for OpenBSD which supports network roaming and such? -- Stefan Parviainen
Re: fd.o HAL support / OpenBSD alternative for NetworkManager
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 17:39 +0200, Stefan Parviainen wrote: Is there any work going on to get support for the freedesktop.org HAL specification (http://wiki.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fhal)? It seems that there are quite a few programs that would benefit from this. Is there a technical reason why this hasn't been implemented yet, or is the reason simply lack of developers? I realize that the port would probably be fairly difficult to make. The reason I'm asking is that on linux I can use this really wonderful program called NetworkManager which manages network connection (Who would have guessed?). Unfortunately it requires fd.o HAL so using it under OpenBSD is currently impossible. Is there any alternative for OpenBSD which supports network roaming and such? Just a thought, but it may have something to do with this: HAL is licensed to you under your choice of the Academic Free License version 2.1, or the GNU General Public License version 2. Both licenses are included here. Some individual source code files and/or binaries may be under the GPL only or under the LGPG. from COPYING, found at http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=hal.git;a=tree, with (my) emphasis strongly on that last sentence. - Bret -- Stefan Parviainen
pf multicast address: very simple question
Dear list members, i am setting up a firewall and would like to block any packet destinated to a multicast address with a protocol not equal to udp. Is this a sound rule? Is it possible? Thanks.
Re: pf multicast address: very simple question
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 04:27:26PM -0200, Gustavo Rios wrote: Dear list members, i am setting up a firewall and would like to block any packet destinated to a multicast address with a protocol not equal to udp. Is this a sound rule? Is it possible? Sure it is possible if it is sound is up to you. e.g. OSPF does not use UDP. Btw. unless you enable multicast forwarding and add some multicast routes no multicast traffic will traverse your firewall. -- :wq Claudio
pf rule question
Hello.
While trying to configure pf to pass dhcp requests I've build a simple rule:
block log all
pass in log on $inf_if proto udp from { $int_if:network 0.0.0.0 } \
port 68 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
But it seems that above rule pass out udp to port 68 (like it was having
keep state added), but it shouldn't, right?
Why and how is that possible?
Thanks in advance.
--
raff
Re: Is Theo still hiking ????
Salut, On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:45:08AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: Note: the OpenBSD routing table does not do that. It's hard to do hardware accelerated FIBs without the hardware, isn't it? While IPv6 has a static header size it uses header stacking and so every router has to do the same stupid header parsing that needs tons of special logic. If you need to look at them at all, that is. For simple end-to-end routing, this is not required. Tonnerre [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
Re: Is Theo still hiking ????
Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote: Salut, On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:45:08AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: Note: the OpenBSD routing table does not do that. It's hard to do hardware accelerated FIBs without the hardware, isn't it? Addon cards can always be done. I am pretty sure that one could devise a way to plugin some hardware lookup table into OpenBSD. Use the source ;) Of course letting the NIC's access it so they can figure out where to send their packets too might be a better scheme. Also some people consider things only to be hardware when it is a real construct of and/or gates and the likes, for them FPGA's don't count... your mileage/ideas/rationale/... may vary. While IPv6 has a static header size it uses header stacking and so every router has to do the same stupid header parsing that needs tons of special logic. If you need to look at them at all, that is. For simple end-to-end routing, this is not required. It does have to look at them even for simple end-to-end routing because some next-headers can be flagged as 'hop by hop' and that means exactly that: every hop needs to look at them and also process them. Normally though one doesn't add these options, but one certainly can and it is expected that people will certainly use them. This is also the fun for many 'firewalls', there are some out there which only look at the first chained header. Some NetFlow implementations also do this, and thus will report HOP BY HOP as the protocol, while it actually is TCP or UDP in the end :) Greets, Jeroen [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]
Re: Is Theo still hiking ????
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 09:14:27PM +0100, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote: Salut, On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:45:08AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: Note: the OpenBSD routing table does not do that. It's hard to do hardware accelerated FIBs without the hardware, isn't it? Using a compiled FIB may be even useful in software. e.g. an LC trie needs around 3-5MB for a full view instead of the 25+ MB of the patricia trie. The smaller size results in less CPU cache trashing and higher speed. Btw. Cisco CEF is nothing more than a compiled FIB everything is still done in software. While IPv6 has a static header size it uses header stacking and so every router has to do the same stupid header parsing that needs tons of special logic. If you need to look at them at all, that is. For simple end-to-end routing, this is not required. If you don't look at the additional IPv6 headers then you should do the same for IPv4 and we're back on square 1. It is in the standard and needs to be implemented even if only 1ppm of the transported packets are using it. -- :wq Claudio
Troubles using OpenBSD as a router (nat) for my lan
I've been considering switching my Linux+iptables-based router with
one running OpenBSD and pf for a while now. And a recent hardware
failure gave me a good opportunity to do so.
After looking (http://www.bgnett.no/~peter/pf/en/ and
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ mostly), I've managed to get
connectivity for my lan.
I am not very experienced with such things, but I am interested in
learning. My previous firewall was a ready-made one, where I just made
modifications as I saw fit, and could easily revert it to a working
state.
The problem is, that only about 50% of things work. Sites like
slashdot.org and google.com works, while vg.no (norwegian newspaper),
msn messenger and CS: Source (Steam) does not.
Obviously, this is not an acceptable situation, and then I turn to you.
I'm connecting to the internet using PPPoE.
# cat /etc/hostname.dc0
inet 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 NONE
# cat /etc/hostname.ep1
up
# cat /etc/hostname.pppoe0
inet 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 NONE \
pppoedev ep1 authproto pap \
authname secretusername authkey mysupersecretpassword up
dest 0.0.0.1
!/sbin/route add default 0.0.0.1
my current pf.conf:
ext_if=pppoe0
int_if=dc0
localnet=$int_if:network
nat on $ext_if from $localnet to any - ($ext_if)
block all
pass from { lo0, $localnet } to any keep state
The output of ifconfig and route show might not be entirely correct,
as the mahine is offline at the moment (need internet to post this
message :p). But it was connected right before I did an 'ifconfig
pppoe0 down'
# ifconfig
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 33224
groups: lo
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6
dc0: flags=8943UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
lladdr 00:04:e2:2e:80:0b
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255
inet6 fe80::204:e2ff:fe2e:800b%dc0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
ep1: flags=8863UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
lladdr 00:20:af:4a:44:9b
media: Ethernet 10baseT
inet6 fe80::220:afff:fe4a:449b%ep1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
pflog0: flags=141UP,RUNNING,PROMISC mtu 33224
pfsync0: flags=0 mtu 1460
groups: carp
enc0: flags=0 mtu 1536
pppoe0: flags=8810POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1492
dev: ep1 state: initial
sid: 0x0 PADI retries: 0 PADR retries: 0
groups: pppoe egress
inet6 fe80::204:e2ff:fe2e:800b%pppoe0 - prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7
inet 0.0.0.0 -- 0.0.0.1 netmask 0x
# route -n show
Routing tables
Internet:
DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs UseMtu Interface
default0.0.0.1UGS 114798 - pppoe0
0.0.0.1defaultUH 10 - pppoe0
10.0.0/24 link#1 UC 30 - dc0
10.0.0.1 00:04:e2:2e:80:0b UHLc1 112 - lo0
10.0.0.51 00:0d:9d:8b:2a:99 UHLc212200 - dc0
10.0.0.53 00:08:a1:ac:27:06 UHLc0 36 - dc0
127/8 127.0.0.1 UGRS00 33224 lo0
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 10 33224 lo0
224/4 127.0.0.1 URS 00 33224 lo0
Internet6:
DestinationGateway
FlagsRefs UseMtu Interface
::/104 ::1UGRS
00 - lo0
::/96 ::1UGRS
00 - lo0
::1::1UH
120 33224 lo0
::127.0.0.0/104::1UGRS
00 - lo0
::224.0.0.0/100::1UGRS
00 - lo0
::255.0.0.0/104::1UGRS
00 - lo0
:::0.0.0.0/96 ::1UGRS
00 - lo0
2002::/24 ::1UGRS
00 - lo0
2002:7f00::/24 ::1UGRS
00 - lo0
2002:e000::/20 ::1UGRS
00 - lo0
2002:ff00::/24 ::1UGRS
00 - lo0
fe80::/10 ::1UGRS
00 - lo0
fe80::%dc0/64 link#1 UC
00 - dc0
fe80::204:e2ff:fe2e:800b%dc0 00:04:e2:2e:80:0b UHL
00 - lo0
fe80::%ep1/64 link#2
Re: Troubles using OpenBSD as a router (nat) for my lan
On 2007/02/09 22:10, Per Christian Bechstrxm Viken wrote:
The problem is, that only about 50% of things work. Sites like
slashdot.org and google.com works, while vg.no (norwegian newspaper),
msn messenger and CS: Source (Steam) does not.
Obviously, this is not an acceptable situation, and then I turn to you.
I'm connecting to the internet using PPPoE.
try with 'scrub out on pppoe0 max-mss 1440' - mentioned in pppoe(4)
(MTU/MSS Issues section)
pass from { lo0, $localnet } to any keep state
'flags S/SA keep state' will help in some situations, notably where
some recent linux and microsoft OS are involved (it is done by default
in -current).
thanks for the full set of information.
Re: Troubles using OpenBSD as a router (nat) for my lan
my current pf.conf:
ext_if=pppoe0
int_if=dc0
localnet=$int_if:network
nat on $ext_if from $localnet to any - ($ext_if)
block all
pass from { lo0, $localnet } to any keep state
I think there must be another line:
pass out on $ext_if all
Because nat processes packets _before_ the filter rules, thus the
outgoing packets on $ext_if have the address of $ext_if. They will be
blocked, because your only pass rule is for packets with an internal
source address.
Jochen
Re: Troubles using OpenBSD as a router (nat) for my lan
On 2/9/07, Jochen Fabricius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my current pf.conf:
ext_if=pppoe0
int_if=dc0
localnet=$int_if:network
nat on $ext_if from $localnet to any - ($ext_if)
block all
pass from { lo0, $localnet } to any keep state
I think there must be another line:
pass out on $ext_if all
Because nat processes packets _before_ the filter rules, thus the
outgoing packets on $ext_if have the address of $ext_if. They will be
blocked, because your only pass rule is for packets with an internal
source address.
Using the two improved lines from Stuart, I managed to get it working.
The pf.conf I had, however, was taken directly from a guide, and with
some tweaking, it now works very well. At least for the time being.
my current pf.conf:
ext_if = pppoe0
int_if = dc0
localnet = $int_if:network
scrub out on $ext_if max-mss 1440
nat on $ext_if from $localnet - ($ext_if)
block in on $ext_if
pass quick on lo0
pass quick on $int_if
pass quick on $ext_if from $localnet to any flags S/SA keep state
pass quick on $ext_if proto {tcp,udp} from any to any port domain
flags S/SA kee
p state
pass in inet proto icmp all keep state
Thanks again for the help. It will be great to have a real machine
doing the routing again, instead of a SMC wireless access point. :)
4.0 on Dell 2650
Hi guys Just wanted to ask if any of you have experience putting openbsd 4.0 to a dell 2650? I tried to boot up using both cd40.iso and floppyB40.fs but it always says no disks found. haven't seen any scsi drives loaded. I tried an initial setup using RAID 5 hardware (configured) and see if 4.0 will see it but with no luck I even tried it with mirror and just a regular stripe.. with still no avail, makes me wonder does this mean openbsd doesn't support scsi controllers build into dell boxes? well any comments or suggestions will be very much appreciated. thanks, -Ed
Dell Poweredge 860 Perc 5IR - can't recognize raid device (sd0)
Hi, I have a brand new Dell Poweredge 850 with two 160 G SAS disks attached to a Perc 5IR controller card. In the BIOS, I have configured them as an IM (Integrated Mirror) Logical Volume. I have synchronized the mirror, and the array is activated. I have played with various BIOS settings, Boot Support, etc, but don't seem to get any different results. When I go to install, either OpenBSD 4.0 or current, I get the following: newfs: /dev/rsd0a: Device not configured mount_ffs: /dev/sd0a on /mnt: Device not configured FATAL ERROR:Cannot mount filesystems. Double-check your configuration and restart the install. At the shell, I can dhclient bge0 and get network connectivity no problem. (how I got my dmesg off). Ideas?? Thanks, Steve Williams dmesg: OpenBSD 4.0-current (RAMDISK_CD) #200: Tue Feb 6 18:04:36 MST 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK_CD cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.81 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,EST,CNXT-ID,CX16 real mem = 1073053696 (1047904K) avail mem = 972259328 (949472K) using 4256 buffers containing 53776384 bytes (52516K) of memory mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 11/02/06, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xffe90, SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xfa5b0 (48 entries) bios0: Dell Computer Corporation PowerEdge 860 pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0x1 pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfba60/176 (9 entries) pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:31:0 (Intel 82801GB LPC rev 0x00) pcibios0: PCI bus #7 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x9000 0xc9000/0x1000 0xca000/0x4e00 0xcf000/0x1800 0xec000/0x4000! acpi at mainbus0 not configured cpu0 at mainbus0 pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel E7230 MCH rev 0x00 ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Intel E7230 PCIE rev 0x00 pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 ppb1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Intel PCIE-PCIE rev 0x09 pci2 at ppb1 bus 2 mpi0 at pci2 dev 8 function 0 Symbios Logic SAS1068 rev 0x01: irq 5 scsibus0 at mpi0: 63 targets sd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: Dell, VIRTUAL DISK, 1028 SCSI3 0/direct fixed sd0: 151634MB, 151634 cyl, 16 head, 128 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 310546432 sec total Intel IOxAPIC rev 0x09 at pci1 dev 0 function 1 not configured ppb2 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 Intel 82801GB PCIE rev 0x01 pci3 at ppb2 bus 3 ppb3 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 Intel PCIE-PCIE rev 0x09 pci4 at ppb3 bus 4 ppb4 at pci0 dev 28 function 4 Intel 82801G PCIE rev 0x01 pci5 at ppb4 bus 5 bge0 at pci5 dev 0 function 0 Broadcom BCM5721 rev 0x11, BCM5750 B1 (0x4101): irq 5, address 00:15:c5:fc:79:5c brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5750 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 0 ppb5 at pci0 dev 28 function 5 Intel 82801G PCIE rev 0x01 pci6 at ppb5 bus 6 bge1 at pci6 dev 0 function 0 Broadcom BCM5721 rev 0x11, BCM5750 B1 (0x4101): irq 3, address 00:15:c5:fc:79:5d brgphy1 at bge1 phy 1: BCM5750 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 0 uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 11 usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0 at usb0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 10 usb1 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1 at usb1 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 6 usb2 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2 at usb2 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 11 usb3 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub3 at usb3 uhub3: Intel EHCI root hub, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered ppb6 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BA AGP rev 0xe1 pci7 at ppb6 bus 7 vga1 at pci7 dev 5 function 0 ATI ES1000 rev 0x02 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 Intel 82801GB LPC rev 0x01: PM disabled pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 1 Intel 82801GB IDE rev 0x01: DMA, channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0 scsibus1 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets cd0 at scsibus1 targ 0 lun 0: HL-DT-ST, DVD-ROM GDR8084N, 1.01 SCSI0 5/cdrom removable cd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2 pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled) Intel 82801GB SMBus rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 not configured isa0 at ichpcib0 isadma0 at isa0 pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5 pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot) pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0 npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16 pccom0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo biomask ffe5 netmask ffed ttymask ffef rd0: fixed, 3800 blocks uhub4 at uhub3
Re: 4.0 on Dell 2650
On Feb 9, 2007, at 4:09 PM, Beavis wrote: Hi guys Just wanted to ask if any of you have experience putting openbsd 4.0 to a dell 2650? Sure. Me and the the thirty or so other people who have posted to this subject in the past year or two, Beavis! http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscw=2r=1s=2650q=b -- Jack J. Woehr Director of Development Absolute Performance, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 303-443-7000 ext. 527
Re: 4.0 on Dell 2650
Beavis wrote: Hi guys Just wanted to ask if any of you have experience putting openbsd 4.0 to a dell 2650? I tried to boot up using both cd40.iso and floppyB40.fs but it always says no disks found. haven't seen any scsi drives loaded. I tried an initial setup using RAID 5 hardware (configured) and see if 4.0 will see it but with no luck I even tried it with mirror and just a regular stripe.. with still no avail, makes me wonder does this mean openbsd doesn't support scsi controllers build into dell boxes? well any comments or suggestions will be very much appreciated. thanks, -Ed Hi, What controller do you have? I'm just trying to install on a Poweredge 860 with a PERC 5IR. Do you have a dmesg? If you can't get one off your system, at the # prompt, you can still configure your network (dhclient/ifconfig) ftp is on the install CD if you have someplace to put it. Worked for me. Cheers, Steve W.
Re: 4.0 on Dell 2650
On Saturday 10 February 2007 00:09, you wrote: Hi guys Just wanted to ask if any of you have experience putting openbsd 4.0 to a dell 2650? I tried to boot up using both cd40.iso and floppyB40.fs but it always says no disks found. haven't seen any scsi drives loaded. I tried an initial setup using RAID 5 hardware (configured) and see if 4.0 will see it but with no luck I even tried it with mirror and just a regular stripe.. with still no avail, makes me wonder does this mean openbsd doesn't support scsi controllers build into dell boxes? well any comments or suggestions will be very much appreciated. Since you didn't provide a dmesg (boo) I can only guess, but typically Dell 2650s are equipped with aac(4) ROMB. aac(4) is not a supported driver anymore as can be seen in the FAQ here (scroll down to 12.7.7); http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq12.html Though it should be noted that as of revision 1.25 aac has improved somewhat and is a bit less error prone as experienced by some of us using this driver. But still, using aac with OpenBSD should not be recommended to those faint of heart. Regards Johan M:son
Re: 4.0 on Dell 2650
I'll try that jack thanks -ed On 2/9/07, Jack J. Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 9, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Beavis wrote: yup jack... just saw it when i did the google specifically for PERC 3Di The one thing I remember from all my Dell Fu is that if you disable all the raid stuff in the BIOS OpenBSD loads. So I guess it's broke w/r/t RAID may be the answer. Or maybe I'm wrong! Take care! *-- * *Jack J. Woehr* *Director of Development* *Absolute Performance, Inc.* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *303-443-7000 ext. 527* * *
Re: 4.0 on Dell 2650
hi Steve, I have a PERC 3/Di on an old Dell 2650, dmesg doesn't show that much info it's just that there's no disk and PERC 3/Di is not-configured seems like dell still hasn't budge .. seems like it's an old issue old donkey-dell.. -Ed On 2/9/07, Steve Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Beavis wrote: Hi guys Just wanted to ask if any of you have experience putting openbsd 4.0to a dell 2650? I tried to boot up using both cd40.iso and floppyB40.fs but it always says no disks found. haven't seen any scsi drives loaded. I tried an initial setup using RAID 5 hardware (configured) and see if 4.0 will see it but with no luck I even tried it with mirror and just a regular stripe.. with still no avail, makes me wonder does this mean openbsd doesn't support scsi controllers build into dell boxes? well any comments or suggestions will be very much appreciated. thanks, -Ed Hi, What controller do you have? I'm just trying to install on a Poweredge 860 with a PERC 5IR. Do you have a dmesg? If you can't get one off your system, at the # prompt, you can still configure your network (dhclient/ifconfig) ftp is on the install CD if you have someplace to put it. Worked for me. Cheers, Steve W.
Re: 4.0 on Dell 2650
On 2/9/07, Beavis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a PERC 3/Di on an old Dell 2650, dmesg doesn't show that much info it's just that there's no disk and PERC 3/Di is not-configured seems like dell still hasn't budge .. seems like it's an old issue old donkey-dell.. Yank out the RAID KEY and the PERC 3/Di will magically vanish and the raw drives will be accessible via the normal on-board controller. You lose hardware RAID, but you can the ability to boot OpenBSD 4.0 GENERIC kernel. Kevin
Re: arptables: unable to enter address
Aleksandar Milosevic wrote: J. Alfred Prufrock wrote: Also, I just noticed in my cable-modem box's configuration page that the WAN gateway is 24.145.134.65, which reverse dns shows to be user-0c931i1.cable.mindspring.com. Isn't it odd that my gateway is another user rather than the ISP? Should I be worried about all this? Yes, you should. Is it staticly configured or obtained from ISP's dhcp I called my ISP, and this is apparently one of their servers. I don't know why it's called user-whatever. So all is well on that front. Regarding the original issue (arptables: unable to enter address): I unhooked the ISP's (misconfigured) Motorola modem and hooked up my own cable-modem, and haven't had any problems. No more arptables errors. Thanks for all your help, guys. J
Re: BGP With Private AS and IP Addresses Routing To An Internet Gateway
Anyone, Router A - $ sudo bgpctl show rib flags: * = Valid, = Selected, I = via IBGP, A = Announced origin: i = IGP, e = EGP, ? = Incomplete flags destination gateway lpref med aspath origin AI* 10.0.0.1/32 0.0.0.0100 0 i I* 10.0.0.3/32 10.77.222.253 100 0 i AI* 10.77.222.0/24 0.0.0.0100 0 i I* 10.222.111.0/24 10.77.222.253 100 0 i AI* 10.254.254.0/24 0.0.0.0100 0 i AI* 172.16.111.0/24 0.0.0.0100 0 i *192.168.111.0/24172.16.111.254 100 0 65535 i $ Router B - $ sudo bgpctl show rib flags: * = Valid, = Selected, I = via IBGP, A = Announced origin: i = IGP, e = EGP, ? = Incomplete flags destination gateway lpref med aspath origin I* 10.0.0.1/32 10.77.222.254 100 0 i AI* 10.0.0.3/32 0.0.0.0100 0 i I* 10.77.222.0/24 10.77.222.254 100 0 i AI* 10.77.222.0/24 0.0.0.0100 0 i AI* 10.222.111.0/24 0.0.0.0100 0 i I* 10.254.254.0/24 10.77.222.254 100 0 i AI* 10.254.254.0/24 0.0.0.0100 0 i I* 172.16.111.0/24 10.77.222.254 100 0 i I* 192.168.111.0/2410.77.222.254 100 0 65535 i $ In both routers A and B, I used OSPF as my IGP. I even put multihop as well as set nexthop self in the /etc/bgpd.conf, still I cannot ping the internet. The loopback addressess for both Router A and Router A can ping each other though. Tips? Regards, Demuel Have a look at bgpctl show rib. I guess all your routes on B and C are invalid because your using iBGP (same AS on all routers) and in that case the nexthops need to be redistributed via an IGP (or covered by static routes) or you could use set nexthop self to force your routers to announce their own address as nexthop. -- :wq Claudio On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 09:45:35AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anybody, If I have two internal routers, say RouterB(ext: 172.16.111.253/32 and int: 10.77.222.254/32) and RouterC(ext: 10.77.222.253/32 and int: 10.222.77.254/32), and these two routers had already established a BGP session. Now, let us say I will have Router B in BGP with RouterA(ext: Internet and 172.16.111.254/32). In all of the routers involved, I enable net.ip.forwarding=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf. Also in routerA, I enabled pf with NAT support. From Router A, I could ping the Internet. But from routerB having a BGP session with RouterA, I cannot ping the internet. And so does in RouterC. Any tips to sort this out?
pcn in VMware, 5KB/s
I'm running OpenBSD 4.0 in VMware workstation 5.5.3 build-34685 linux host. Scp's between the guest and host only manage about 5KB/s so I tried going back to le which worked great. I configured a new kernel with disable pcn* but on next boot I had no nics at all, so i tried again disable pci* also since I think le is isa, but it still didn't work. How can I get the cards to register as le again? Thanks, Brad. _ From predictions to trailers, check out the MSN Entertainment Guide to the Academy Awards. http://movies.msn.com/movies/oscars2007/?icid=ncoscartagline1
OpenBSD on Xeon 64 bit
Hi, I like to know if the OpenBSD for amd64 is working fine with intel Xeon processors (64 bit). I am reading here ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD64 ) and here ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xeon#Xeon_.26_Xeon_MP_.2864-bit.29 ) that these processors are based on AMD64 instruction set. The openBSD faq for AMD64 said: All versions of the AMD Athlon 64 processors and their clones are supported. I assume that their clones are the processors based on AMD64 instruction set...like this xeon. Am i wrong? Right now they are working very well with the OpenBSD i386 release. Thanks, Alvaro
