Re: Performance issues with the DNS patch?

2008-07-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008-07-26, J Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I moved back to an earlier version of OpenBSD on the DNS server, and
 the Ironport traffic went up to normal, and the DNS lookup failures stopped.
 Cpu utilization went back down to around 9%. But I'm vulnerable.

Sending spam seems a good way to force certain DNS lookups to be
done by the receiver, so depending on exactly what DNS lookups your
spam filtering systems are doing, you might _really_ not want to
be pointing them at an easily poisoned resolver. 

 I realize that the whole fix to this DNS cache poisoning is to have random
 ports and random query ids, and that generating good, strong, random numbers
 costs cpu cycles and time.  Has anyone else noticed the performance hit?

It's not just generating random numbers that burns cycles, you also
take a hit from finding unused ports to send queries from, etc.

You might want to try unbound (in packages/ports for -current). 
It's pretty sane and easy to get along with. For a busy system
it has a big advantage over bind: if you configure IP aliases
on the machine and list them manually in separate outgoing-
interface lines, it will rotate between them, reducing the
contention on port numbers.

With unbound, don't take the shortcut of listing 0.0.0.0 /
::0 in Interface: lines, list incoming interfaces individually,
this avoids problems with replies going out with wrong source
addresses.

Note that this port randomisation does not _fix_ cache
poisoning, it just makes it more difficult.



Thinkpad G40 anyone?

2008-07-27 Thread Sunnz
Just wondering if anyone has OpenBSD running on a G40, I have been
considering to pick up a second hand one for experiemental with
OpenBSD, trying out new code and stuff... it would be nice to know
that at least its wired network port works...

I tried to search on the ibm web site but all it says is 10/100
Ethernet installed on systems via the system board so if anyone who
owns one can make some recommendation that would be great.

Thanks.

Sunnz.



Re: Thinkpad G40 anyone?

2008-07-27 Thread David Vasek

On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Sunnz wrote:


Just wondering if anyone has OpenBSD running on a G40, I have been
considering to pick up a second hand one for experiemental with
OpenBSD, trying out new code and stuff... it would be nice to know
that at least its wired network port works...

I tried to search on the ibm web site but all it says is 10/100
Ethernet installed on systems via the system board so if anyone who
owns one can make some recommendation that would be great.


I have never met a G40 in person, but based on available documentation it 
should be equipped with a Broadcom BCM5901, which is supported by bge(4).


Regards,
David



Re: Thinkpad G40 anyone?

2008-07-27 Thread Sunnz
2008/7/27 David Vasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Sunnz wrote:

 Just wondering if anyone has OpenBSD running on a G40, I have been
 considering to pick up a second hand one for experiemental with
 OpenBSD, trying out new code and stuff... it would be nice to know
 that at least its wired network port works...

 I tried to search on the ibm web site but all it says is 10/100
 Ethernet installed on systems via the system board so if anyone who
 owns one can make some recommendation that would be great.

 I have never met a G40 in person, but based on available documentation it
 should be equipped with a Broadcom BCM5901, which is supported by bge(4).


Ohh I see thanks for the heads up.


-- 
This e-mail may be confidential. You may not copy, forward,
distribute, or, use any part of it. Note, this text has no effective
legal binding on your part, there is no obligation to abide any or all
parts of this. Treat it with the same level of care as any other
pretending-to-be-law-speaking-but-not-really texts attached to e-mail
messages you normally find on any other e-mails. For more information
about disclaimers, please see:
http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/



spamd stopped logging

2008-07-27 Thread mk

Hello all

I've found that my spamd on OpenBSD 4.2 stable box stopped logging 
information provided by -v flag.
I did not make any changes on my box in last few days at least I think. 
(except named build)
It was working without any problem for several months. Now, all I can get 
from spamd into my log file is that daemon started, that's all.


my syslog.conf
!spamd
daemon.err;daemon.warn;daemon.info  /var/log/spamd

/var/log/spamd exists, but spamd writes there only these messages:

Jul 27 11:57:19 sra spamd[3752]: listening for incoming connections

I'm starting spamd this way: spamd_flags=-v -G5:4:864
I tried to restart it manually also with syslogd but nothing changed.

Thanks for any hint.
MK



soekris perf + uvideo

2008-07-27 Thread jul

Hello

do you think a soekris 4801 or 5501 can handle 2 to 4 usb video cameras 
with the new uvideo driver ?
handle, in a way, get it on the box and record on a local hard disk or 
stream it (with vlc server for example)

resolution and ips could be restricted but could it be possible ?

thanks



Re: Performance issues with the DNS patch?

2008-07-27 Thread Daniel Melameth
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 4:12 PM, J Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I wonder is anyone is seeing performance issues with the patched DNS in the
 late snapshots?
 I installed the July 22 snapshot on our DNS servers, which handle a pretty
 heavy load of lookups, mostly for anti-spam action.

 It was running at 45% or higher cpu utilization after the July 22 snapshot
 was
 installed.
 We run a couple of Ironport boxes, that handle about 200k emails per hour.
 They use the OpenBSD DNS servers to look up the sending IPs as a first
 defense
 against spammers, and drop about 98% of the inbound mail.
 With the snapshot installed the traffic went down to 70k per hour and
 people started complaining of DNS lookup failures for random sites.

While I haven't compared the two, this is a known issue with the ISC
patch as well--though I understand the beta version of BIND includes
optimized code that will reduce the impact in performance to
non-significant levels.



Re: IPv6 transition

2008-07-27 Thread Dirk Mast
Claudio Jeker wrote:

 On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:15:42AM +0200, Amaury De Ganseman wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I'm looking for an implementation of BIS (Bump in the stack) or
 another mecanism to provide access for IPv4-only users to the IPv6
 world.
 
 There's faithd and others TRT daemon but it's for IPv6-only to IPv4
 world.
 
 
 Spend your time on something else there are way to many things that will
 break in terrible ways.
 

Perhaps Reyk's latest changes to relayd will do it?

http://216.194.67.89/cgi?action=articlesid=20080724184757mode=expandedcount=12



Re: atheros - just curious, ot

2008-07-27 Thread Marco Peereboom
I threw my git saving throw so I was able to avoid looking at it.

On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:09:49AM -0400, bofh wrote:
 On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
 
  On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 11:01:33PM -0400, bofh wrote:
   saw
  
  http://madwifi.org/wiki/news/20080725/ath9k-atheros-unveils-free-linux-driver-for
  
   and was just curious if this is true 'open source' or is it full of magic
   numbers...
 
  well, you can 'git' the sources yourself.
 
 
 Apologies.  If openbsd authors are level 30 Gods, I'm a level 0 NPC.
 
 
 
 -- 
 http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
 This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity. --
 Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.
 Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or
 internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks factory
 where smoking on the job is permitted. -- Gene Spafford
 learn french: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1G-3laJJP0feature=related



Re: cronjob -l option assume and only use 1 minute load average?

2008-07-27 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 05:00:56PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I couldn't find witch of the three possible value the -l option of the 
 cron refer to in the man page and look at the code in 
 /src/usr.sbin/cron/atrun.c that use the getloadavg(la, 1) to get that 
 value, the first of 3 if I am not mistaken. I had to look at the man 
 page for getloadavg to know that as well.
 
 So, am I correct to think that the load average in cronjob ONLY use the 
 1 minute average, always?
 
 It 1 minute average is always assume by default every time load average 
 is used system wide?
 
 May be if I may suggest to to have the man page changed from
 
 -l load_avg
   If the current load average is greater
 
 to
 
 -l load_avg
   If the current (1 minute) load average is greater
 
 That's fine if that's just me that didn't get it. I just thought that it 
 would be nice not to have to dig to find what I think it the right 
 answer assuming I find it correctly.?
 
 I can send a diff if that's not stupid to do, but I really had to dig 
 this one up to know. Google and the man page didn't provide the answer 
 to me right away anyway, but the code did. (;
 
 I was hoping to have the possibility to use the 15 minutes average here 
 in cronjob. Not the end of the world and I can live without it. But I 
 didn't get the answer from the man page however in term of what the load 
 average was. I guess most likely it's always assume to be the case 
 system wide?
 
 Could also be my English as if I was native, may be the current load 
 average always refer to the smallest of the three possible values that 
 are all current moving load average anyway.
 
 Just a thought.
 
 Thanks
 
 Daniel

i asked todd miller about this, and he says he interprets current load
average to be the 1 minute average (closest to now). i think that's a
reasonable interpretation, so i don;t think we need to change the
description.

having said that, uvm(9) talks about current load averages (plural),
so i need to find out if that's something worth tweaking.

jmc



Securely tunneling POP3 using only base?

2008-07-27 Thread Aaron W. Hsu
Hey All,

I am reading through some of the documentation on SSH and popa3d, and 
I am not quite sure how to configure my mail server for secure POP3 
that other clients can use without using additional tools such as 
stunnel. I am reading the ssh(1) man page, and I actually found some 
interesting things in the fetchmail(1) page, but that's not base. 

If I just wanted to setup a secure email server using only what's in 
base to provide secure POP3 to clients, can someone provide some 
hints? It seems like I can easily do this client-side, by using 
tcp forwarding and ssh, and with fetchmail I can automate this 
using the preconnect keyword, but I do not see a way to do all the 
securing on the server side, so that if someone, say, on Windows 
wants to use my server, they can just use a secure connection from 
one of the common email clients available on that platform. 

Is there a way to do this with only the tools and software in base? 

Sincerely,
Aaron Hsu



Re: /usr/bin/ssh: can't load library 'libcrypto.so.14.0' on ALIX board

2008-07-27 Thread Theo de Raadt
 cp /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.13.0 /usr/lib/libcrypto.14
 
 Don't knock it, it works.

Don't do this, because one day I might purposely show you the
consequences of it.



Re: atheros - just curious, ot

2008-07-27 Thread Theo de Raadt
 saw
 http://madwifi.org/wiki/news/20080725/ath9k-atheros-unveils-free-linux-driver-for
 
 and was just curious if this is true 'open source' or is it full of magic
 numbers...

I have a question for you, actually.

Have you not been listening every single time when we ask for the documentation?



Re: BIND OpenBSD patch and ISC

2008-07-27 Thread Theo de Raadt
 Just a simple question: is the OpenBSD patch for bind is the same
 solution as ISC ? Are they use the same RN ?

The patch release for older OpenBSD releases contains the same horrid
solution that ISC came up with, since it is 100% their code.  Of
course, the bind included in all OpenBSD releases does contain privsep
and other diffs.

But in general yes, it has the same random number generator, especially
since ISC got that from us.



Re: atheros - just curious, ot

2008-07-27 Thread bofh
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 I have a question for you, actually.

 Have you not been listening every single time when we ask for the
 documentation?


I have, unfortunately.  From the announcement, it sounded open source but
undocumented, and also in conjunction with mad-wifi folks, so I didn't have
high hopes.  I was just hoping that someone decided to do the right thing.
Sounds like they decided a good show was better than doing the right thing
:(


-- 
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity. --
Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.
Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or
internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks factory
where smoking on the job is permitted. -- Gene Spafford
learn french: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1G-3laJJP0feature=related



Re: atheros - just curious, ot

2008-07-27 Thread bofh
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:53 PM, bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have, unfortunately.  From the announcement, it sounded open source but
 undocumented, and also in conjunction with mad-wifi folks, so I didn't have
 high hopes.  I was just hoping that someone decided to do the right thing.
 Sounds like they decided a good show was better than doing the right thing
 :(


I went back and re-read the press release.  It seems to be much worse than
first glance.  [we hired X to] helps enhance regulatory compliance in the
Linux kernel.  This probably means locking down the driver even more.
Pretty sad.

I'm hoping VIA's release of documentation is far better.


-- 
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity. --
Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.
Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or
internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks factory
where smoking on the job is permitted. -- Gene Spafford
learn french: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1G-3laJJP0feature=related



FAQ License?

2008-07-27 Thread my mail
i have search for keywords OpenBSD FAQ License but can found it. It's same 
license with OpenBSD in http://openbsd.org/policy.html ?

if different where i can found BSD license for document not for binary or 
source code or can i use BSD License for document?

thx for help



SATA/PATA boot order

2008-07-27 Thread Steve Shockley
I'm trying to set up a Dell SC420 with 4.3.  The machine has two SATA 
hard drives and a PATA DVD drive.  All that works fine.


Now I'm trying to add a PATA drive to copy data.  When I either install 
the PATA drive on the on-board controller or on a PCI PATA controller, 
the machine boots from SATA, but detects the PATA drive as wd0 and tries 
to load the OS, and dies.


How can I tell OpenBSD to boot from SATA, but still mount drives on PATA?

Dmesg (without PATA hard drive) below.

OpenBSD 4.3 (GENERIC) #698: Wed Mar 12 11:07:05 MDT 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.80 GHz
cpu0: 
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,CNXT-ID,xTPR

real mem  = 2137145344 (2038MB)
avail mem = 2058469376 (1963MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 02/06/06, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xffe90, 
SMBIOS rev. 2.3 @ 0xf0450 (66 entries)

bios0: vendor Dell Inc. version A02 date 02/06/2006
bios0: Dell Inc. PowerEdge SC420
apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2
apm0: APM get power status: unknown error code? (83)
acpi at bios0 function 0x0 not configured
pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0x1
pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfeb00/240 (13 entries)
pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:31:0 (Intel 82801FB LPC rev 0x00)
pcibios0: PCI bus #4 is the last bus
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x9800! 0xc9800/0x1800! 0xcb000/0x1000
cpu0 at mainbus0
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel E7221 Host rev 0x04
ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Intel E7221 PCIE rev 0x04: irq 11
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 Intel E7221 Video rev 0x04
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
ppb1 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 Intel 82801FB PCIE rev 0x03: irq 11
pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
bge0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Broadcom BCM5751 rev 0x01, BCM5750 A1 
(0x4001): irq 11, address 00:13:20:3d:b1:3e

brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5750 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 0
ppb2 at pci0 dev 28 function 1 Intel 82801FB PCIE rev 0x03: irq 10
pci3 at ppb2 bus 3
uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: irq 9
uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: irq 5
uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: irq 3
uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 3 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: irq 10
ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: irq 9
usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub0 at usb0 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
ppb3 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BA Hub-to-PCI rev 0xd3
pci4 at ppb3 bus 4
ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 Intel 82801FB LPC rev 0x03: PM disabled
pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 1 Intel 82801FB IDE rev 0x03: DMA, 
channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility

atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0
scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: TSSTcorp, CDW/DVD TS-H492A, HP03 SCSI0 
5/cdrom removable

cd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2
pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled)
pciide1 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 Intel 82801FR SATA rev 0x03: DMA, 
channel 0 configured to native-PCI, channel 1 configured to native-PCI

pciide1: using irq 5 for native-PCI interrupt
wd0 at pciide1 channel 0 drive 0: WDC WD800JD-75JNC0
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 76293MB, 15625 sectors
wd0(pciide1:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
wd1 at pciide1 channel 1 drive 0: ST3320620AS
wd1: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 305245MB, 625142448 sectors
wd1(pciide1:1:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
ichiic0 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 Intel 82801FB SMBus rev 0x03: irq 10
iic0 at ichiic0
spdmem0 at iic0 addr 0x50: 1GB DDR2 SDRAM non-parity PC2-4200CL3
spdmem1 at iic0 addr 0x52: 1GB DDR2 SDRAM non-parity PC2-4200CL3
usb1 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1 Intel UHCI root hub rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb2 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0
uhub2 at usb2 Intel UHCI root hub rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb3 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0
uhub3 at usb3 Intel UHCI root hub rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb4 at uhci3: USB revision 1.0
uhub4 at usb4 Intel UHCI root hub rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
isa0 at ichpcib0
isadma0 at isa0
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
pms0 at pckbc0 (aux slot)
pckbc0: using irq 12 for aux slot
wsmouse0 at pms0 mux 0
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
midi0 at pcppi0: PC speaker
spkr0 at pcppi0
lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
pccom0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
biomask e76d netmask ef6d ttymask ffef
mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support
softraid0 at root
root on wd0a swap on wd0b dump on wd0b



Re: atheros - just curious, ot

2008-07-27 Thread Jeffrey 'jf' Lim
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 9:00 AM, bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I went back and re-read the press release.  It seems to be much worse than
 first glance.  [we hired X to] helps enhance regulatory compliance in the
 Linux kernel.  This probably means locking down the driver even more.
 Pretty sad.

 I'm hoping VIA's release of documentation is far better.


not too sure about that!!!
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=via_bluffnum=1

http://linux.via.com.tw/ - the damned bastards released nothing but binary
drivers. And not even theirs at that!! (look at the filename -
via-unichrome This is a vendor, pretending to be offer open source
support - but only pointing to/pushing u back to the reverse engineering
efforts which are in need of the *real* support from VIA in the first
place!!!).

-jf

--
In the meantime, here is your PSA:
It's so hard to write a graphics driver that open-sourcing it would not
help.
-- Andrew Fear, Software Product Manager, NVIDIA Corporation
http://kerneltrap.org/node/7228



Re: atheros - just curious, ot

2008-07-27 Thread bofh
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:


 http://linux.via.com.tw/ - the damned bastards released nothing but binary
 drivers. And not even theirs at that!! (look at the filename -
 via-unichrome This is a vendor, pretending to be offer open source
 support - but only pointing to/pushing u back to the reverse engineering
 efforts which are in need of the *real* support from VIA in the first
 place!!!).

 Here's the updated link:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=NjYyMg

800 pages worth of docs.  Not sure how much use that is, but hopefully
useful.


-- 
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity. --
Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.
Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or
internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks factory
where smoking on the job is permitted. -- Gene Spafford
learn french: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1G-3laJJP0feature=related



Re: SATA/PATA boot order

2008-07-27 Thread Chris Bennett

This is so simple if you know the answer, and very hard otherwise.

/etc/fstab will refuse to work unless the wd0 and etc are correct.
But after making a change in drives, whichever one is wd0 or wd1 will 
change and booting fails.

This is easy to fix if you  use vi or another editor.
But you will need to define:
export TERM=xterm  (or vt220 etc.)

you will need to mount / as read write by running fsck -p then mount -uw 
/dev/wd0a /

THEN
fsck -p /dev/(whichever is /usr)
and mount  -w /dev/wd0d (or whichever is /usr) /usr


after this you can use vi successfully to edit /etc/fstab to reflect 
correct wd0 or wd1 etc correctly


reboot and all will be OK

I just had a few beers and tequilas
, so I may be a little off in the details., but the TERM command is the 
real secret
to get editors to work. Read the man pages for fsck and mount if this 
fails as I described.


Good Luck and this will work!!
Chris



Steve Shockley wrote:
I'm trying to set up a Dell SC420 with 4.3.  The machine has two SATA 
hard drives and a PATA DVD drive.  All that works fine.


Now I'm trying to add a PATA drive to copy data.  When I either 
install the PATA drive on the on-board controller or on a PCI PATA 
controller, the machine boots from SATA, but detects the PATA drive as 
wd0 and tries to load the OS, and dies.


How can I tell OpenBSD to boot from SATA, but still mount drives on PATA?

Dmesg (without PATA hard drive) below.

OpenBSD 4.3 (GENERIC) #698: Wed Mar 12 11:07:05 MDT 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 
2.80 GHz
cpu0: 
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,CNXT-ID,xTPR 


real mem  = 2137145344 (2038MB)
avail mem = 2058469376 (1963MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 02/06/06, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 
0xffe90, SMBIOS rev. 2.3 @ 0xf0450 (66 entries)

bios0: vendor Dell Inc. version A02 date 02/06/2006
bios0: Dell Inc. PowerEdge SC420
apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2
apm0: APM get power status: unknown error code? (83)
acpi at bios0 function 0x0 not configured
pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0x1
pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfeb00/240 (13 entries)
pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:31:0 (Intel 82801FB LPC rev 0x00)
pcibios0: PCI bus #4 is the last bus
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x9800! 0xc9800/0x1800! 0xcb000/0x1000
cpu0 at mainbus0
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel E7221 Host rev 0x04
ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Intel E7221 PCIE rev 0x04: irq 11
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 Intel E7221 Video rev 0x04
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
ppb1 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 Intel 82801FB PCIE rev 0x03: irq 11
pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
bge0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Broadcom BCM5751 rev 0x01, BCM5750 A1 
(0x4001): irq 11, address 00:13:20:3d:b1:3e

brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5750 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 0
ppb2 at pci0 dev 28 function 1 Intel 82801FB PCIE rev 0x03: irq 10
pci3 at ppb2 bus 3
uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: irq 9
uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: irq 5
uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: irq 3
uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 3 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: irq 10
ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: irq 9
usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub0 at usb0 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
ppb3 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BA Hub-to-PCI rev 0xd3
pci4 at ppb3 bus 4
ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 Intel 82801FB LPC rev 0x03: PM 
disabled
pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 1 Intel 82801FB IDE rev 0x03: DMA, 
channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to 
compatibility

atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0
scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: TSSTcorp, CDW/DVD TS-H492A, HP03 SCSI0 
5/cdrom removable

cd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2
pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled)
pciide1 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 Intel 82801FR SATA rev 0x03: DMA, 
channel 0 configured to native-PCI, channel 1 configured to native-PCI

pciide1: using irq 5 for native-PCI interrupt
wd0 at pciide1 channel 0 drive 0: WDC WD800JD-75JNC0
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 76293MB, 15625 sectors
wd0(pciide1:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
wd1 at pciide1 channel 1 drive 0: ST3320620AS
wd1: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 305245MB, 625142448 sectors
wd1(pciide1:1:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
ichiic0 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 Intel 82801FB SMBus rev 0x03: irq 10
iic0 at ichiic0
spdmem0 at iic0 addr 0x50: 1GB DDR2 SDRAM non-parity PC2-4200CL3
spdmem1 at iic0 addr 0x52: 1GB DDR2 SDRAM non-parity PC2-4200CL3
usb1 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1 Intel UHCI root hub rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1