i have a proposal of trasaction of fund sum 12.6million usd I want to transfer
You are invited to i have a proposal of trasaction of fund sum 12.6million usd I want to transfer. By your host denis kabore: Date: Saturday January 10, 2009 Time: 8:00 am - 9:00 am (GMT +00:00) Guests: * micxy...@hotmail.co.uk * m...@oddcity.fsnet.co.uk * mikkimcla...@hotmail.com * miky...@hotmail.it * milesjohn...@hotmail.com * millababii...@yahoo.com * miniho...@hotmail.com * mirap...@hotmail.com * misc@openbsd.org * miss_bad_cu...@hotmail.com * missyb...@yahoo.com * misterma...@yahoo.com * mitche...@hotmail.com * miz.rah...@tiscali.co.uk * mjcollie...@btinternet.com * mjennej...@yahoo.com * mm_galbra...@hotmail.com * mmedi...@hotmail.com * mngi...@hotmail.co.uk * mona.mar...@synovate.com * monsterboy_nish_n...@hotmail.com * montgomeryt...@hotmail.com * moorefieldbra...@yahoo.com * moose1...@hotmail.co.uk * mopar...@hotmail.com * mosel...@pacbell.net * mountfor...@hotmail.com * moy...@hotmail.com * m...@hotmail.com * mr.ama...@hotmail.com * mrj...@hotmail.com * mrsyaifulbahr...@hotmail.com * mscottschill...@hotmail.com * mseansm...@hotmail.com * msglorypela...@yahoo.com.ph * mssouthde...@hotmail.co.uk * mtay...@grove4.demon.co.uk * mtgi...@removethis.yahoo.com * munday2...@hotmail.co.uk * musicboxestu...@hotmail.com * musician2wors...@yahoo.com * mu...@cafc.co.uk * muzzy_fo...@hotmail.co.uk * mvdsl.comdelewk...@hotmail.com * mvnews...@hotmail.com * mwelber...@googlemail.com * mwke...@ihug.co.nz * mx4hnp7...@hotmail.com * myer...@msn.com * nad...@hotmail.com * nadr...@hotmail.com * nai2...@hotmail.co.uk * nancyp...@hotmail.com * na...@hotmail.com * narutoche...@hotmail.co.uk * nash_nic...@y.c.ph * nbenn...@hotmail.co.uk * ncis.gi...@hotmail.co.uk * neamat...@hotmail.com * neilelliot...@hotmail.com * neko...@hotmail.co.uk * ne...@netzero.net * neonricekil...@hotmail.com * n...@tlio.org.uk * nextxaj...@hotmail.com * nger...@hotmail.com * ngib...@hotmail.com * nice_cute1...@y.ph * nicholas.b...@yahoo.com * n...@nickrobinsons.co.uk * nickand...@hotmail.com * nickpig...@yahoo.com.au * nickru...@hotmail.com * nicola_thomas1...@hotmail.com * nicolemus...@hotmail.co.uk * nicolesingleton...@hotmail.com * nicoletteby...@hotmail.co.uk * nikki.sosa65...@hotmail.com * nlj...@hotmail.com * nnpascual...@yahoo.com.ph invitation_add_to_your_yahoo_calendar: http://calendar.yahoo.com/?v=60ST=20090110T08%2BTITLE=i+have+a+proposal+of+trasaction+of+fund+sum+12.6million+usd+I+want+to+transferDUR=0100VIEW=dDESC=i+have+a+proposal+of+trasaction+of+fund+sum+12.6million+usd+I+want+to+transferTYPE=10 Copyright ) 2009 All Rights Reserved www.yahoo.com Privacy Policy: http://privacy.yahoo.com/privacy/us Terms of Service: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: OpenBGPD Flaps, 32bit ASn in the wild.
Am 10.12.2008 um 23:32 schrieb Claudio Jeker: The best thing we can do is to mark the update as ineligible so it will not propaget further and will not be used but this is a quite radical measure. On the other hand this is porbably the safest way to handle this error. Sound good for me. Is there any patch I can download and compile bgpd on my own? :wq Claudio Regards, Falk
Re: How to determine my ip address (logged in via ssh)
Am 09.01.2009 um 12:21 schrieb Darren Tucker: echo $SSH_CLIENT | cut -f1 -d' ' Perfect. Thank you (and all the others) for your support! Falk
Re: Create a bootable usb key?
Lars NoodC)n larsnoo...@openoffice.org a C)crit : The way I did it was to boot /bsd.rd and then do an installation to the USB key but installing a single set, bsd.rd, and only that set. Then after booting back to the regular system mounted the stick and added /etc/boot.conf by hand. What I'd like to do eventually is set up grub or something so I have a menu to choose the different options 4.3, 4.4, release, stable, current, i386, amd64, etc. Finally here is what I've done. The problem was I only have a computer with linux and an internet connexion and I wanted to install openbsd on a laptop without using CD or working internet connexion. - I installed openbsd on a USB Key using qemu + install44.iso - I added an openbsd install sets on the USB key - I modified the /etc/fstab in order to be able to boot on the real system from the usb key - I booted bsd.rd on the laptop - I installed OpenBSD on the hard disk of the laptop - reboot it - ... and let the real fun begin :) Now next step is to have wired network working and so add support to my Attansic Technology L1E. Regards, Guillaume
4.4 behind router - Apache not responding from external
I have OpenBSD 4.4 installed on this server of mine, it works perfectly well with everything on the LAN; http, ftp, etc. But it doesn't respond to external requests, from the internet. I don't know if there's a line in the config that I've missed or something, because pf is set up to let everything in and out (just for now). I have set up port forwarding and all the stuff on the router side of things, it may still be a router problem, though. BSD seems to be set up correctly. Any help would be much appreciated! - Thomas
Re: 4.4 behind router - Apache not responding from external
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 04:36:47PM +, KammyDoe wrote: I have OpenBSD 4.4 installed on this server of mine, it works perfectly well with everything on the LAN; http, ftp, etc. But it doesn't respond to external requests, from the internet. I don't know if there's a line in the config that I've missed or something, because pf is set up to let everything in and out (just for now). I have set up port forwarding and all the stuff on the router side of things, it may still be a router problem, though. BSD seems to be set up correctly. Any help would be much appreciated! Without more information it could be almost anything. Things you might do: * reduce to simplest pf.conf with problems and post it here * enable pflog and tcpdump on pflog0 to see which rule matches for block, or if the traffic is even getting that far * disable pf and see if it works -- Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG dwchand...@stilyagin.com | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
Re: OpenBGPD Flaps, 32bit ASn in the wild.
Falk Brockerhoff wrote: Am 10.12.2008 um 23:32 schrieb Claudio Jeker: The best thing we can do is to mark the update as ineligible so it will not propaget further and will not be used but this is a quite radical measure. On the other hand this is porbably the safest way to handle this error. Sound good for me. Is there any patch I can download and compile bgpd on my own? Regards, Falk Falk, Read the rest of the thread to which you've just responded: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=122894875212174w=2 http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/bgpd/rde.c -Tico
OpenBGPd on OpenBSD (Failover + Load balancing)
Hi, I'm about to get my own AS to be able to get good redundancy from 2 ISP (Fiber + DSL). Since a cisco solution is not really cheap i'm wondering how a similar solution could run on OpenBSD. Requirements: - Load balancing - Failover - Throughput (i know we should talk in pps...): 20Mb/s (soon to expect 50Mb) - Rock solid solution Do you think an openBGP/openBSD solution is viable considering those requirements ? Thanks
Re: OpenBGPd on OpenBSD (Failover + Load balancing)
Laurent CARON wrote: Hi, I'm about to get my own AS to be able to get good redundancy from 2 ISP (Fiber + DSL). Since a cisco solution is not really cheap i'm wondering how a similar solution could run on OpenBSD. Requirements: - Load balancing - Failover - Throughput (i know we should talk in pps...): 20Mb/s (soon to expect 50Mb) - Rock solid solution Do you think an openBGP/openBSD solution is viable considering those requirements ? Thanks Laurent, I invite you to google and read through the misc@ archives, where this question has been rehashed a million times. The short answer is yes; read the documentation. I, and many others use OpenBSD in [very] high-traffic, redundant, and often times complex network environments. If you read through this *entire* thread, it should answer nearly all of your questions with regards to the capabilities of OpenBSD: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=121581561216571w=2 ... though any remaining questions have probably already been asked and answered before in the archives. If, after reading all of the documentation you are still not able to or confident in your ability to implement or manage an OpenBSD-based network infrastructure to support your company's needs there are a number of folks that can provide commercial support, many of which either lurk on this list or are listed here: http://www.openbsd.org/support.html Best regards -Tico
Re: Create a bootable usb key?
On 2009-01-10, Guillaume Thouvenin guillaume.thouve...@polymtl.ca wrote: Now next step is to have wired network working and so add support to my Attansic Technology L1E. This chip is not yet supported in OpenBSD. N.B. it is not the same as either Attansic L1 or L2.
lifetime-related problems with isakmpd
Hello. I am trying to use an OpenBSD 4.3 box as the terminator of a VPN to a business partner, but we're having some problems. From time to time, my counterparty sees packets with an old SPI. This coincides with me seeing packets from my internal network missing trying to hit the default route out instead of being routed through the VPN, which leads me to suspect that the VPN tunnel gets torn down at that moment. We suspect problems related to timing. We are trying to use 86400 seconds lifetime for phase 1 and 3600 seconds for phase 2. I have tried to specify this, both using /etc/ipsec.conf and ipsecctl to drive isakmpd, and /etc/isakmpd/isakmpd.conf directly, skipping ipsecctl. But I still see attribute LIFE_DURATION = 1200 in QUICK_MODE exchanges and 3600 in ID_PROT exchanges. What am I missing here? I'm at my wit's end, all suggestions welcome. I include the configurations tried, and an exerpt of the isakmpd.pcap file that shows the problem I'm seeing. The report generated by SIGUSR1 shows the same as the tcpdump: lifetimes of 3600 and 1200 secs for main- and quick-mode, respectively. If there is any other information I can provide, please tell me. I don't know what system my counterparty is using for VPN, but I can probably find out, if it's relevant. Also, please Cc me on replies, as I'm not subscribed to the list. From ipsec.conf: ike esp from x.x.x.101/32 to y.y.y.0/24 peer z.z.z.1 \ main auth hmac-sha1 enc 3des group modp1024 life 86400 \ quick auth hmac-md5 enc 3des group none life 3600 \ psk *** From isakmpd.conf (obviously, isakmpd.conf was not present when trying to use ipsec.conf and ipsecctl): [General] Retransmits= 5 Listen-on= x.x.x.90 Renegotiate-on-HUP= yes [Phase 1] z.z.z.1=peer-other [Phase 2] Connections=VPN-other [peer-other] Phase= 1 Address=z.z.z.1 Configuration= other-main-mode Authentication= [VPN-other] Phase= 2 ISAKMP-peer=peer-other Configuration= other-quick-mode Local-ID= my-internal-net Remote-ID= other-subnet [my-internal-net] ID-type=IPV4_ADDR_SUBNET Network=x.x.x.101 Netmask=255.255.255.255 [other-subnet] ID-type=IPV4_ADDR_SUBNET Network=y.y.y.0 Netmask=255.255.255.0 [other-main-mode] EXCHANGE_TYPE= ID_PROT Transforms= 3DES-SHA,3DES-MD5 Life= LIFE_86400_SECS [other-quick-mode] EXCHANGE_TYPE= QUICK_MODE Suites= QM-ESP-3DES-MD5-SUITE Life= LIFE_3600_SECS [LIFE_86400_SECS] LIFE_TYPE= SECONDS LIFE_DURATION= 86400,60:86400 [LIFE_3600_SECS] LIFE_TYPE= SECONDS LIFE_DURATION= 3600,60:86400 tcpdump of isakmpd.pcap shows (sorry about overlong lines): 23:04:45.330914 x.x.x.90.500 z.z.z.1.500: [udp sum ok] isakmp v1.0 exchange QUICK_MODE cookie: 99a52e9f544cf112-9aeaa9d500dd1f88 msgid: 6d8579bb len: 152 payload: HASH len: 24 payload: SA len: 48 DOI: 1(IPSEC) situation: IDENTITY_ONLY payload: PROPOSAL len: 36 proposal: 1 proto: IPSEC_ESP spisz: 4 xforms: 1 SPI: 0x58981dda payload: TRANSFORM len: 24 transform: 1 ID: 3DES attribute LIFE_TYPE = SECONDS attribute LIFE_DURATION = 1200 attribute ENCAPSULATION_MODE = TUNNEL attribute AUTHENTICATION_ALGORITHM = HMAC_MD5 payload: NONCE len: 20 payload: ID len: 16 type: IPV4_ADDR_SUBNET = x.x.x.101/255.255.255.255 payload: ID len: 16 type: IPV4_ADDR_SUBNET = y.y.y.0/255.255.255.0 [ttl 0] (id 1, len 180) 23:04:45.543109 z.z.z.1.500 x.x.x.90.500: [udp sum ok] isakmp v1.0 exchange QUICK_MODE cookie: 99a52e9f544cf112-9aeaa9d500dd1f88 msgid: 6d8579bb len: 164 payload: HASH len: 24 payload: SA len: 48 DOI: 1(IPSEC) situation: IDENTITY_ONLY payload: PROPOSAL len: 36 proposal: 1 proto: IPSEC_ESP spisz: 4 xforms: 1 SPI: 0xeb872e73 payload: TRANSFORM len: 24 transform: 1 ID: 3DES attribute LIFE_TYPE = SECONDS attribute LIFE_DURATION = 1200 attribute ENCAPSULATION_MODE = TUNNEL attribute AUTHENTICATION_ALGORITHM = HMAC_MD5 payload: NONCE len: 24 payload: ID len: 16 type: IPV4_ADDR_SUBNET = x.x.x.101/255.255.255.255 payload: ID len: 16 type: IPV4_ADDR_SUBNET = y.y.y.0/255.255.255.0 [ttl 0] (id 1, len 192) 23:04:45.560126 x.x.x.90.500 z.z.z.1.500: [udp sum ok] isakmp v1.0 exchange QUICK_MODE cookie:
Pedido de remoção da lista Novos
recebemos um pedido de remogco do seu enderego misc@openbsd.org na lista Novos. Por favor, clique no seguinte enderego para confirmar que pretende anular a sua subscrigco: http://www.mktid.com/pub/rm.php?dodel=dodelu=2d50b65318l=1491
newbie - migrating - home drive, UIDs, and etc/group, and such
HiHi All! I've migrated bunches of drives under RH (yeah since 4.2) but I'm an OBSD xtreme-nooobeee. Been reading tons of docs and I think I've got my ducks lined up but want to double check with an opinion or two. Box has 3 drives, boot, home, and backup. I did the install with just the one boot drive mostly because the faq4.html wasn't *absolutely* clear *exactly* how to implement the word 'possible' in note that it is possible to leave some partitions untouched... and I'd rather be 'too safe' than go to the backups. Don't get me wrong, the docs are excellent, just a couple of points of unclarity like that one. So after the install I had a few adventures learning about wd** and labels and such and now I've got: # # /etc/fstab # # boot and 'c' and such /dev/wd2a / ffs rw 1 1 /dev/wd2g /home ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2 /dev/wd2d /tmpffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2 /dev/wd2f /usrffs rw,nodev1 2 /dev/wd2e /varffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2 # # old 500G home drive /dev/wd1j /home-b ext2fs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2 # # backup 400G drive /dev/wd0i /400ext2fs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2 Yep I relabeled the old home to home-b before plugging it it. So what I think I need to do is: 1) umount home 2) umount home-b 3) relabel home to home-spare 4) relabel home-b to home 5) In fstab change these lines from: /dev/wd2g /home /dev/wd1j /home-b to: /dev/wd2g /home-spare /dev/wd1j /home 6) And mount -av Sounds good? Ok now on to the users. BTW this is a small home server thing just a few friends with accounts and a buncha services user names total about 40. Would it be 'better' to migrate /etc/passwd as described in http://openbsd.rt.fm/faq/faq9.html#passwd, which I have already built files for but not installed, or should I adduser them all from scratch and let the system take care of UIDs and groups. If I migrate, then there's the remote possibility of some incompatibility of a user name I miss (lots of editing/checking,) and I have to build the group file by hand. If I recreate users, then it's fully compatible. But I need to chmod the whole /home/* to match the new ID numbers, though that's not a big deal by script. OK even as I'm writing that I'm already leaning towards recreate. I'd rather be safe and guaranteed compatible than slip and push a wrong button and take hours to find out what I screwed up. Colorful Caveats: If you comment, and you're right, then the check will be in the mail on monday morning. But, if you're wrong, you'll be hearing from guido *and* my attorney on tuesday afternoon. LOL TYIA Have a :) day! Jim -- j...@jbarchuk.com -- No that's not back up yet, it's under the /home drive.
Re: newbie - migrating - home drive, UIDs, and etc/group, and such
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Jim Barchuk j...@jbarchuk.com wrote: /dev/wd1j /home-b ext2fs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2 /dev/wd0i /400ext2fs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2 Sounds good? I would not recommend using ext2fs for long term storage. It's fine for migration, but not intended to be a primary store. Would it be 'better' to migrate /etc/passwd as described in http://openbsd.rt.fm/faq/faq9.html#passwd, which I have already built files for but not installed, or should I adduser them all from scratch and let the system take care of UIDs and groups. Certainly, you are less likely to screw anything up by running adduser a few times compared to trying a bulk update, but then the user IDs aren't likely to match the ones on disk and fixing that later may pose trouble (wrong permissions). But at least the system is always likely to work. Messing with master.passwd yourself (by forgetting a in , say) is a good way to really break things.
Re: newbie - migrating - home drive, UIDs, and etc/group, and such
HiHi Ted! /dev/wd1j /home-b ext2fs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2 /dev/wd0i /400ext2fs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2 I would not recommend using ext2fs for long term storage. It's fine for migration, but not intended to be a primary store. Yep that's in my list of TTD but the more basic drive/partition migration comes first. Would it be 'better' to migrate /etc/passwd as described in http://openbsd.rt.fm/faq/faq9.html#passwd, which I have already built files for but not installed, or should I adduser them all from scratch and let the system take care of UIDs and groups. Certainly, you are less likely to screw anything up by running adduser a few times compared to trying a bulk update, but then the user IDs aren't likely to match the ones on disk and fixing that later may pose trouble (wrong permissions). Sure they definitely won't match. What I meant was: If I recreate users, then it's fully compatible. But I need to chmod the whole /home/* to match the new ID numbers, though that's not a big deal by script. From the new passwd file I can extract all the names, IDs, and /home paths, and edit that down to a script with a ton of chown -R (not chmod as I said above.) TY Have a :) day! Jim -- j...@jbarchuk.com
Re: newbie - migrating - home drive, UIDs, and etc/group, and such
On 11 January 2009 c. 06:46:59 Ted Unangst wrote: On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Jim Barchuk j...@jbarchuk.com wrote: /dev/wd1j /home-b ext2fs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2 /dev/wd0i /400ext2fs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2 Sounds good? I would not recommend using ext2fs for long term storage. It's fine for migration, but not intended to be a primary store. Would it be 'better' to migrate /etc/passwd as described in http://openbsd.rt.fm/faq/faq9.html#passwd, which I have already built files for but not installed, or should I adduser them all from scratch and let the system take care of UIDs and groups. Certainly, you are less likely to screw anything up by running adduser a few times compared to trying a bulk update, but then the user IDs aren't likely to match the ones on disk and fixing that later may pose trouble (wrong permissions). But at least the system is always likely to work. Messing with master.passwd yourself (by forgetting a in You can specify exact UIDs for each user you create with adduser. Problems start to arrive only when existing (old) UIDs or GIDs interfere with (new) system ones. And even in this case something like this will do the job: set -e cd /home for U in alex joe paul; do set -- `ls -nld $U` OLDUID=$3 OLDGID=$4 groupadd $U useradd $U NEWUID=`id -u $U` NEWGID=`id -g $U` find $U -user $OLDUID -print0 | xargs -0r chown $NEWUID find $U -group $OLDGID -print0 | xargs -0r chown $NEWGID done -- Best wishes, Vadim Zhukov
