Re: OpenBSD mentioned in Bruce Schneier interview

2007-12-05 Thread Nick Guenther
On 12/5/07, Lars Noodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 OpenBSD gets a short mention in a blog:

 Q:
 ... why in the world canb t we design a computer that can
 b cold bootb  nearly instantaneously? I know about
 hibernation, etc., but when I do have to reboot, I hate
 waiting those three or four minutes.  

 Schneier:
 Of course we  can; Amiga was a fast booting computer,
 and OpenBSD boxes  boot in less than a minute. But the
 current crop of major  operating systems just donb t.
 This is an economics  blog, so you tell me: why donb t
 the computer companies  compete on boot-speed?


http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/04/bruce-schneier-blazes-throug
h-your-questions/

 It's interesting that the issue of why a computer must be cold booted is
 not brought up, especially in the day and age where hibernation modes
 are readily available.  Perhaps, the interviewer is a victim of the
 Microsoft effect.

Hibernation modes readily available?
Hibernation is flakey flakey flakey.

Still, it's a good point. OpenBSD manages to boot so quickly even
though it has all drivers enabled and running at boot--though I'm not
sure if it's always under a minute.

-Nick



OpenBSD mentioned in Bruce Schneier interview

2007-12-05 Thread Lars Noodén
OpenBSD gets a short mention in a blog:

Q:
... why in the world canbt we design a computer that can
bcold bootb nearly instantaneously? I know about
hibernation, etc., but when I do have to reboot, I hate
waiting those three or four minutes.  

Schneier:
Of course we  can; Amiga was a fast booting computer,
and OpenBSD boxes  boot in less than a minute. But the
current crop of major  operating systems just donbt.
This is an economics  blog, so you tell me: why donbt
the computer companies  compete on boot-speed?

http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/04/bruce-schneier-blazes-through-your-questions/

It's interesting that the issue of why a computer must be cold booted is
not brought up, especially in the day and age where hibernation modes
are readily available.  Perhaps, the interviewer is a victim of the
Microsoft effect.

-Lars



Re: OpenBSD mentioned in Bruce Schneier interview

2007-12-05 Thread Ioan Nemes
 ...  hibernation modes are readily available.

Lars, you misspelled this, `available` = sucks!

Ioan



 Lars NoodC)n [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/12/2007 11:40 
OpenBSD gets a short mention in a blog:

Q:
... why in the world canbt we design a computer that can
bcold bootb nearly instantaneously? I know about
hibernation, etc., but when I do have to reboot, I hate
waiting those three or four minutes.  

Schneier:
Of course we  can; Amiga was a fast booting computer,
and OpenBSD boxes  boot in less than a minute. But the
current crop of major  operating systems just donbt.
This is an economics  blog, so you tell me: why donbt
the computer companies  compete on boot-speed?

http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/04/bruce-schneier-blazes-throug
h-your-questions/


It's interesting that the issue of why a computer must be cold booted
is
not brought up, especially in the day and age where hibernation modes
are readily available.  Perhaps, the interviewer is a victim of the
Microsoft effect.

-Lars






This e-mail is intended for the addressee(s) named and may contain
confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, please delete it immediately and notify the sender. Any views
expressed in this email are those of the individual sender except where
the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of
Fairfield City Council.