Re: Thecus N2100 and RAID 1

2007-05-10 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister

On May 8, 2007, at 6:44 AM, Aaron Poffenberger wrote:

Raidframe is really easy to use.  The man pages for raidctl(8) will  
give

you step-by-step instructions.  In a nutshell, though:

1) enable raidframe in your kernel (search for RAIDframe in GENERIC to
get find the line),
2) create the raidn.conf (where n is a number for the array) following
the man page -- see the examples section,
3) create the raid -- again, see the examples section in the man page,
4) copy the raidn.conf file to /etc if you want auto configuration
during reboots (this part didn't leap out at me from the manpage),
5) enjoy.


Raidframe works very well. I followed the instructions at

http://www.eclectica.ca/howto/openbsd-software-raid-howto.php

and my RAID 1 is rebuilding right now. Everything seems to be working  
very well. I just posted another thread regarding the lack of  
automatic boot in latest firmware issue.


Bryan



Re: Thecus N2100 and RAID 1

2007-05-09 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister

On May 8, 2007, at 6:44 AM, Aaron Poffenberger wrote:

Raidframe is really easy to use.  The man pages for raidctl(8) will  
give

you step-by-step instructions.  In a nutshell, though:

1) enable raidframe in your kernel (search for RAIDframe in GENERIC to
get find the line),
2) create the raidn.conf (where n is a number for the array) following
the man page -- see the examples section,
3) create the raid -- again, see the examples section in the man page,
4) copy the raidn.conf file to /etc if you want auto configuration
during reboots (this part didn't leap out at me from the manpage),
5) enjoy.


Thanks for the feedback. Once the N2100 arrives (which should be  
tomorrow), I will try it.


Bryan



Re: Thecus N2100 and RAID 1

2007-05-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2007/05/07 20:39, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
 I actually meant to ask what type of physical memory does the box take. 

http://onbeat.dk/thecus/index.php/N2100_Hardware



Re: Thecus N2100 and RAID 1

2007-05-08 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister

On May 8, 2007, at 12:36 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:


On 2007/05/07 20:39, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
I actually meant to ask what type of physical memory does the box  
take.


http://onbeat.dk/thecus/index.php/N2100_Hardware


Thanks.

Bryan



Re: Thecus N2100 and RAID 1

2007-05-08 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:39:50PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
 On May 7, 2007, at 4:11 PM, Joachim Schipper wrote:
 
 On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 02:02:19PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
 On May 7, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
 
 I'm using a thecus 2100 with raidframe to do raid 1. A bit slow, but
 with 512MB RAM it's acceptable.
 
 Would ccd(4) be any faster? Also, what sort of RAM does it take?
 Thanks for your response.
 
 ccd is likely to be slightly faster, but it *will* eat your data. Just
 stick with RAIDframe, or hardware RAID, or the upcoming softraid (like
 RAIDframe, but newer and shinier; I presume it'll be announced on
 undeadly.org one of these days). Worrying about ccd/RAIDframe memory
 usage really isn't necessary; both don't use memory on a scale that  
 you
 will notice with that amount of memory in the box.
 
 So you are saying that ccd(4) has reliability problems? I actually  
 meant to ask what type of physical memory does the box take. Thanks  
 for your response.

No no, ccd(4) works as designed. And for concatenated disks, it does
exactly what you would expect that to be. For mirrored disks, though,
you'd like it to have better support for rebuilding after failures.

Joachim

-- 
TFMotD: tset (1) - terminal initialization



Re: Thecus N2100 and RAID 1

2007-05-08 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister

On May 8, 2007, at 2:54 AM, Joachim Schipper wrote:


On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:39:50PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:

So you are saying that ccd(4) has reliability problems? I actually
meant to ask what type of physical memory does the box take. Thanks
for your response.


No no, ccd(4) works as designed. And for concatenated disks, it does
exactly what you would expect that to be. For mirrored disks, though,
you'd like it to have better support for rebuilding after failures.


I understand. I am really only interested in mirroring so I guess I  
should just probably use raidframe and see how it goes.


Bryan



Re: Thecus N2100 and RAID 1

2007-05-08 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister

On May 8, 2007, at 3:00 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:


On 2007/05/08 02:23, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:

 On May 8, 2007, at 12:36 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:

http://onbeat.dk/thecus/index.php/N2100_Hardware


 Thanks.


btw, I don't know about the warning from Thecus about timing that
it talks about - I never had any trouble with the first DIMM I pulled
from a PC (-:


I saw that. The link you sent above shows that a particular Corsair  
module is compatible so I just ordered that module. We'll see when it  
arrives later this week.


Bryan 



Re: Thecus N2100 and RAID 1

2007-05-08 Thread Aaron Poffenberger
Raidframe is really easy to use.  The man pages for raidctl(8) will give
you step-by-step instructions.  In a nutshell, though:

1) enable raidframe in your kernel (search for RAIDframe in GENERIC to
get find the line),
2) create the raidn.conf (where n is a number for the array) following
the man page -- see the examples section,
3) create the raid -- again, see the examples section in the man page,
4) copy the raidn.conf file to /etc if you want auto configuration
during reboots (this part didn't leap out at me from the manpage),
5) enjoy.

Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
 On May 8, 2007, at 2:54 AM, Joachim Schipper wrote:

 On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:39:50PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
 So you are saying that ccd(4) has reliability problems? I actually
 meant to ask what type of physical memory does the box take. Thanks
 for your response.

 No no, ccd(4) works as designed. And for concatenated disks, it does
 exactly what you would expect that to be. For mirrored disks, though,
 you'd like it to have better support for rebuilding after failures.

 I understand. I am really only interested in mirroring so I guess I
 should just probably use raidframe and see how it goes.

 Bryan



Re: Thecus N2100 and RAID 1

2007-05-07 Thread Matthieu Herrb

On 5/7/07, Bryan Vyhmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I was just wondering about whether the Thecus N2100 running OpenBSD/
armish can operate in RAID 1 mode. Maybe this is a stupid question
but I couldn't find anything about it and I am interested to know.
Obviously I would not be running the firmware from Thecus and I am
guessing that this precludes having any RAID functionality. If RAID 1
is not possible with hardware (or firmware or whatever) is using ccd
(4) for RAID 1 possible?

I am interesting in using this box for a light duty mail server for a
test but it is important that I can have a RAID 1 setup. Any other
comments about this are appreciated as well. Thank you.


I'm using a thecus 2100 with raidframe to do raid 1. A bit slow, but
with 512MB RAM it's acceptable.



Re: Thecus N2100 and RAID 1

2007-05-07 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister

On May 7, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Matthieu Herrb wrote:


I'm using a thecus 2100 with raidframe to do raid 1. A bit slow, but
with 512MB RAM it's acceptable.


Would ccd(4) be any faster? Also, what sort of RAM does it take?  
Thanks for your response.


Bryan



Re: Thecus N2100 and RAID 1

2007-05-07 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 02:02:19PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
 On May 7, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
 
 I'm using a thecus 2100 with raidframe to do raid 1. A bit slow, but
 with 512MB RAM it's acceptable.
 
 Would ccd(4) be any faster? Also, what sort of RAM does it take?  
 Thanks for your response.

ccd is likely to be slightly faster, but it *will* eat your data. Just
stick with RAIDframe, or hardware RAID, or the upcoming softraid (like
RAIDframe, but newer and shinier; I presume it'll be announced on
undeadly.org one of these days). Worrying about ccd/RAIDframe memory
usage really isn't necessary; both don't use memory on a scale that you
will notice with that amount of memory in the box.

Joachim

-- 
TFMotD: named.conf (5) - configuration file for named



Re: Thecus N2100 and RAID 1

2007-05-07 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister

On May 7, 2007, at 4:11 PM, Joachim Schipper wrote:


On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 02:02:19PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:

On May 7, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Matthieu Herrb wrote:


I'm using a thecus 2100 with raidframe to do raid 1. A bit slow, but
with 512MB RAM it's acceptable.


Would ccd(4) be any faster? Also, what sort of RAM does it take?
Thanks for your response.


ccd is likely to be slightly faster, but it *will* eat your data. Just
stick with RAIDframe, or hardware RAID, or the upcoming softraid (like
RAIDframe, but newer and shinier; I presume it'll be announced on
undeadly.org one of these days). Worrying about ccd/RAIDframe memory
usage really isn't necessary; both don't use memory on a scale that  
you

will notice with that amount of memory in the box.


So you are saying that ccd(4) has reliability problems? I actually  
meant to ask what type of physical memory does the box take. Thanks  
for your response.


Bryan



Thecus N2100 and RAID 1

2007-05-06 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister
I was just wondering about whether the Thecus N2100 running OpenBSD/ 
armish can operate in RAID 1 mode. Maybe this is a stupid question  
but I couldn't find anything about it and I am interested to know.  
Obviously I would not be running the firmware from Thecus and I am  
guessing that this precludes having any RAID functionality. If RAID 1  
is not possible with hardware (or firmware or whatever) is using ccd 
(4) for RAID 1 possible?


I am interesting in using this box for a light duty mail server for a  
test but it is important that I can have a RAID 1 setup. Any other  
comments about this are appreciated as well. Thank you.


Bryan