Re: install sets as packages

2006-04-20 Thread Will H. Backman

Daniel Ouellet wrote:

Will H. Backman wrote:

Would there be a benefit to use the pkg_ tools to install and manage the
install sets?


I fail to see the point of it really. The install set is done at 
install time, or to add it if you miss it at the install.


Plus packages tools is there to take care of dependency, etc. To 
remove all applications and add new one, or upgraded one.


The install set are for the system and if there is upgrade to it, it's 
a patch.


You wouldn't want someone to do:

sudo pkg_delete etc39.tgz

or

sudo pkg_delete base39.tgz

for example would you?

If so, I wonder how you would still use the server?

I could imagine some benefits.  Add the xserv39.tgz install set, get 
xbase xshare and xfont maybe.  I'm not sure of the dependencies.  Also 
packages can include post install scripts, such as making the device 
nodes, etc.  I also don't know if the package upgrade kung-fu could 
eventually help upgrade the base install sets such as etc.

It was mostly a half baked question anyway.  Food for thought.

-- Will



Re: install sets as packages

2006-04-20 Thread Wijnand Wiersma
Maybe the installer can stay as is but record the components in de
base system as packages in /var/db/pkg so upgrades later on can be
performed with pkg_add, in smaller portions.

But, I have nothing to complain about the current situation, it works great now.
Doing this, and doing it right will take too much developer time.

Wijnand



install sets as packages

2006-04-19 Thread Will H. Backman
As no answer came up after a little searching on google and the openbsd
FAQ...
Would there be a benefit to use the pkg_ tools to install and manage the
install sets?  The pkg_ tools seem to be a fairly elegent system.
So if money and time and developers grew on trees, would it be a
reasonable goal?  Just a simple design question.

Yes, the installer works, so why fix what isn't broke.
Yes, I'm a regular user asking other people to do work. (actually, I'm
not asking for anything except knowledge).
Yes, the package management system may not fit on the install floppy.
I sure hope I didn't miss the FAQ entry that already answers this
question.

-- Will



Re: install sets as packages

2006-04-19 Thread Daniel Ouellet

Will H. Backman wrote:

Would there be a benefit to use the pkg_ tools to install and manage the
install sets?


I fail to see the point of it really. The install set is done at install 
time, or to add it if you miss it at the install.


Plus packages tools is there to take care of dependency, etc. To remove 
all applications and add new one, or upgraded one.


The install set are for the system and if there is upgrade to it, it's a 
patch.


You wouldn't want someone to do:

sudo pkg_delete etc39.tgz

or

sudo pkg_delete base39.tgz

for example would you?

If so, I wonder how you would still use the server?



Re: install sets as packages

2006-04-19 Thread Theo de Raadt
Would there be a benefit to use the pkg_ tools to install and manage the
install sets?

Good luck fitting the pkg_tools and perl onto the install floppies.



Re: Where to get md5 of X* install sets and packages

2005-11-26 Thread Julian Leyh
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:30:08 -0500
Will H. Backman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 If you are looking for MD5 sums to verify the trustworthiness of the
 packages, I think the best way would be to purchase the official CDs
 from the OpenBSD store and run the MD5 tool yourself.  Not the most
 useful answer for your immediate problem.  If you don't trust the
 package on the ftp site, you can't trust the MD5 sums on that site
 either.

Well, i'm downloading snapshots.. and because i only have ISDN speed,
it could be that i download broken packages - they could have been
updated while downloading (and i often get disconnected, wget -c thinks
it's still the same file).
Would be nice to check if the download was successfull.

Checking the other packages is no problem. i simply download MD5 after
downloading them all and check them.

There's a trick to determine if there _could be_ an error:
I have a close look on the modification time of the X packages before
download and compare them to the value after downloading.. if they have
changed i'll have to re-fetch them.
With a md5 sum i could see which files need to be downloaded again if
any..

cu
JRL

-- 
If you don't remember something, it never existed...
If you aren't remembered, you never existed...
I don't quite understand what love is like... But if there
was someone who liked me, I'd be happy.



Re: Where to get md5 of X* install sets and packages

2005-11-22 Thread Will H. Backman
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
 Siju George
 Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 10:46 PM
 To: misc
 Subject: Re: Where to get md5 of X* install sets and packages
 
 On 11/18/05, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  http://ftp.jyu.fi/ftp/pub/OpenBSD/3.8/i386/MD5
 
  doesnot give md5 sums of Xbase, Xofnts, X* install sets.
 
  Where do I get them from??
 
  Also fro where do I get the md5 sums of packages??
 
  Thankyou so much
 
 
 Just wondering why no one answered this question either on the newbie
 list or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Is it that no one knows or is it such a dump question and the answer
 is already some where? Didn't even get an RTFM for it.
 
 kind regards
 
 Siju

If you are looking for MD5 sums to verify the trustworthiness of the
packages, I think the best way would be to purchase the official CDs
from the OpenBSD store and run the MD5 tool yourself.  Not the most
useful answer for your immediate problem.  If you don't trust the
package on the ftp site, you can't trust the MD5 sums on that site
either.



Re: Where to get md5 of X* install sets and packages

2005-11-21 Thread Siju George
On 11/18/05, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi all,

 http://ftp.jyu.fi/ftp/pub/OpenBSD/3.8/i386/MD5

 doesnot give md5 sums of Xbase, Xofnts, X* install sets.

 Where do I get them from??

 Also fro where do I get the md5 sums of packages??

 Thankyou so much


Just wondering why no one answered this question either on the newbie
list or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it that no one knows or is it such a dump question and the answer
is already some where? Didn't even get an RTFM for it.

kind regards

Siju