Re: network bandwith with em(4)
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 00:51:46 + (UTC) Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote: | On 2011-02-28, Manuel Guesdon ml+openbsd.m...@oxymium.net wrote: | http://www.oxymium.net/tmp/core3-dmesg | | ipmi0 at mainbus0: version 2.0 interface KCS iobase 0xca2/2 spacing 1 | | ipmi is disabled in GENERIC. have you tried without it? Not on this server (I can't reboot it often) but on another one with same hardware: it doesn't seems to make difference (it still have Ierr). Manuel -- __ Manuel Guesdon - OXYMIUM
Re: Would appreciate clarification on supported 10Gb Intel to resolve conflict between man and hardware section.
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 06:09:36PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to get some clarification on what would work and not for the 10Gb Intel network cards? I compare the man page, both man(4) ixgb and man(4) ix as well as the hardware section and looked at the data from Intel to find more in trying to answer that question. But I am still looking for confirmation of the support or not in OpenBSD for some of them. I get conflicting information and I am not sure what is real. The hardware compatible page do list: # Intel 82597 PRO/10GbE based PCI adapters (ixgb) # Intel 82598 PRO/10GbE based PCI adapters (ix) The man(4) ixgb show the 82597, fine. The man(4) ix does list the 82598AF, 82598EB, 82598AT and 82599EB as well and the X520 series SFP models, X520,DA2, X520-SR1, X520-SR2, X520-LR1 but not the RJ-45 model X520-T1 based on the same 82599ES. But again the man(4) ix do not list the 82599ES as a supported chipset, but that's what is in the X520 SFP series. The intel product documents are confused about which chips they use. The clearest split is something along the lines of: 7 82599EB -- PCI Express* (PCIe*) 2.0, dual port 10 Gigabit Ethernet controller 7 82599ES -- Serial 10 GbE backplane interface for blade implementations (includes the 82599EB SKU functionality plus serial). Looking more at Intel to try to figure this out here: http://download.intel.com/network/connectivity/products/prodbrf/252454.pdf I see all the listed model in the man page X520-DA2, X520-SR1, X520-SR2, X520-LR1 are all based on the 82599ES, but then the 82599ES is not listed in the chipset in that man page, however these cards works based on the man page and then the X520-T2 is also based on the same chip 82599ES as well. So, it should work right and should be in the list or am I missing something? What about the Intel 10 Gigabits AT2 then. It's designed with the 82598EB and that's on the man page, but not listed in hardware, anyone knows if that works or not? Based on the man page, the X520-T1 may be wouldn't work, but looking at what chip it used and what other model are supported it should also work. I would appreciate confirmation or denial here and possibly an update to the man page to clarify that? Anyone have one of these and can tell for sure if that's true or not? So, shouldn't the 82599ES be added to the man page if the X520 series are all supported then? And possibly the X520-T1 as well as it does use the same chipset, but only the difference in the connector or am I missing something here? I would appreciated some feedback either way as spending $600+ to find out if it doesn't is a bit hard. (; There are mentions of 82598 10GbaseT working, I don't see why 82599 10GbaseT wouldn't work off hand.
E necessario aggiornare il tuo Visa - MasterCard profilo.
Gentile Cliente, A causa del nostro recente aggiornamento sui nostri server (03/3/2011) h necessario aggiornare il tuo profilo. Per una maggiore sicurezza e di accesso, si prega di compilare il modulo allegato. Vi ringraziamo della vostra collaborazione. ) Copyright Visa Europe 2011. Tutti i diritti riservati [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type APPLICATION/DEFANGED which had a name of Il tuo profile.1167DEFANGED-html]
Votre client paie quand ca lui chante
Bonjour, Vous avez des impayis ` encaisser en France, en Europe ou dans le reste du Monde ? Confiez vos impayis ` Europe Recouvrement, spicialisi en recouvrement de criances ` l'international depuis 1970. Les interventions amiables et judiciaires sont basies sur un principe de risultats obtenus pour votre compte : PAS DE SUCCES, PAS D'HONORAIRES. Europe Recouvrement c'est : - Des interventions personnalisies en 7 langues, - Des services certifiis ` la norme ISO 9001, - Des iquipes de juristes expirimentis, - Des risultats garantis dans les 30 jours. En ce moment, un chhque de riduction de 100 ? vous est offert ` valoir sur les honoraires d'encaissement de votre deuxihme impayi remis. Je demeure ` votre entihre disposition pour tous renseignements complimentaires. Trhs cordialement, EUROPE RECOUVREMENT Pour vous disabonner, collez ce lien dans votre navigateur : http://www.gce-mailer-13.com/unsuscribe.asp?lang=francaisid_formulaire=4email=misc@openbsd.orgid_message=799
Re: network bandwith with em(4)
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 09:11:13AM +0100, Manuel Guesdon wrote: On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 00:51:46 + (UTC) Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote: | On 2011-02-28, Manuel Guesdon ml+openbsd.m...@oxymium.net wrote: | http://www.oxymium.net/tmp/core3-dmesg | | ipmi0 at mainbus0: version 2.0 interface KCS iobase 0xca2/2 spacing 1 | | ipmi is disabled in GENERIC. have you tried without it? Not on this server (I can't reboot it often) but on another one with same hardware: it doesn't seems to make difference (it still have Ierr). This diff will help./sarcasm I think we already mentioned it that you will always see Ierr. The question is if the box is able to forward more then 150kpps. -- :wq Claudio Index: if_em.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_em.c,v retrieving revision 1.249 diff -u -p -r1.249 if_em.c --- if_em.c 13 Feb 2011 19:45:54 - 1.249 +++ if_em.c 3 Mar 2011 10:01:39 - @@ -3194,14 +3194,7 @@ em_update_stats_counters(struct em_softc ifp-if_collisions = sc-stats.colc; /* Rx Errors */ - ifp-if_ierrors = - sc-dropped_pkts + - sc-stats.rxerrc + - sc-stats.crcerrs + - sc-stats.algnerrc + - sc-stats.ruc + sc-stats.roc + - sc-stats.mpc + sc-stats.cexterr + - sc-rx_overruns; + ifp-if_ierrors = 0; /* Tx Errors */ ifp-if_oerrors = sc-stats.ecol + sc-stats.latecol +
Re: Redundant IPSEC tunnels
On 2011-03-01, Claer cl...@claer.hammock.fr wrote: On Tue, Mar 01 2011 at 30:03, Steve wrote: Hi all, We have a high speed Internet link at a primary site that has had some stability issues. We would like to set up an adsl link as a backup to maintain the ipsec tunnels to the secondary sites if we have further issues. Currently clients at site B talk to servers at site A through Tunnel A. If tunnel A breaks we need them to talk through tunnel B. I was going to run multiple ipsec.conf files at the secondary sites and in the event of failure log in and tear down the tunnel A and fire up tunnel B. I'd generally recommend trying to keep the ipsec config as straightforward as possible... You setup permanently tunnels A and B, you add gif over both tunnels, then you run ospf on to of gif on both end points, assigning different weights for the links. Yes this should work fine. Another option is to use gre(4) which (as of OpenBSD 4.8) supports keepalives directly, and add routes of different priorities over the primary and backup tunnel interfaces. There are advantages and disadvantages to both methods.
Recouvrement de creances : service TOUT COMPRIS
Si vous ne visualisez pas ce message, suivez ce lien Pour chaque dossier transmis par Internet, 1 ? est versi ` l'association + Entrepreneurs du Monde ;, qui accompagne des dizaines de milliers de micro-entreprises dans le monde par l'attribution de microcridits accordis aux entrepreneurs les plus dishiritis. Le slogan de l'association est Avec presque rien on peut changer presque tout. Recouvrement de criances amiable et judiciaire, France International depuis 1970 Pour l'encaissement de vos impayis : PAS DE SUCCHS, PAS D'HONORAIRES Binificiez en plus de l'option TOUT COMPRIS Les frais de procidure judiciaire sont avancis par FRANCE CREANCES. L'option TOUT COMPRIS vous est offerte ` la remise du dossier. Sociiti spicialisie depuis 1970, en recouvrement amiable et judiciaire, en France et ` l'international, FRANCE CREANCES est membre de l'ANCR et signataire de la charte de diontologie professionnelle qui implique la couverture par une assurance responsabiliti professionnelle souscrite auprhs de la Cie MMA. La certification ISO 9001 (dilivrie par l'AFAQ) garantit le respect des procidures de traitement des dossiers de recouvrement confiis ` FRANCE CREANCES. Le montant des encaissements est reversi au 30 de chaque mois et le bilan de la sociiti fait apparantre trhs clairement les sommes disponibles pour le compte de ses clients, en sus d'une caution bancaire. Rifirencie par des centaines de PME#8260;PMI, FRANCE CREANCES intervient aussi pour des grands groupes, des banques et des Etablissements Publics Industriels et Commerciaux. Le centre de traitement International de FRANCE CREANCES travaille en Anglais, Allemand, Espagnol, Italien, Polonais. Pour vous disabonner, collez ce lien dans votre navigateur : http://www.gce-mailer-3.com/unsuscribe.asp?lang=francaisid_formulaire=4email=misc@openbsd.orgid_message=810
Re: What do you guys use against spam?
2011/3/3 Hugo Osvaldo Barrera h...@osvaldobarrera.com.ar On 03/03/11 03:44, Theo de Raadt wrote: Wrong mailing list to discuss this. Please take it elsewhere. I thought this would be the ideal place for this sort of thing. I did forget to mention, but the mail server is running openbsd, and smtpd It's not on topic for misc@openbsd to ask: How do I drive to the Colosseum from Hotel Ritz, I have an openbsd laptop in the passenger seat. -- To our sweethearts and wives. May they never meet. -- 19th century toast
GRE pppoe MTU
Hi all, Looking to implement ospf over ipsec and need gre in the mix to make it work. Even leaving out IPSEC I have erratic communication over the gre tunnels. Pings always Ok but rdp or http traffic is hit and miss. I have been assuming an MTU issue. I have max-mss set at 1440 on the pppoe interface and have randomly tried different mtu settings on gre interface down to 1240 with no luck. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks
Re: GRE pppoe MTU
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 05:06:02AM -0800, Steve wrote: Hi all, Looking to implement ospf over ipsec and need gre in the mix to make it work. Even leaving out IPSEC I have erratic communication over the gre tunnels. Pings always Ok but rdp or http traffic is hit and miss. I have been assuming an MTU issue. I have max-mss set at 1440 on the pppoe interface and have randomly tried different mtu settings on gre interface down to 1240 with no luck. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks Any information on your hardware/software/network appreciated. e.g. are you running OpenBSD? Ken
Clarifications on bridge and pf
Hi there,
Yesterday I tossed my switch in the bin and got a sun quad fast
ethernet to do it's job.
What I have is a bridged setup with an ip in hme1... I have now
something like this:
ext_if = hme0
bridge0 = { hme1, hme2, hme3, hme4 }
hme1 has ip 192.168.8.1
My concern is, how is pf semantics regarding traffic on the bridge ?
Should I match packets on bridge0 or on all of the hme ?
I've noticed the following, with rules like this:
block
pass on hme1
pass on bridge0
I could not get traffic from hosts in hme2 to hme3 for example.
Although the 'pass on bridge0 allowed multicast to travel through bridge.
Eventually I did something like pass on { hme1 hme2 hme3 hme4 }
So it seems multicast matches bridge0, while normal unicast traffic does not.
I'm new to pf, read the manual but that didn't become clear to me.
What am I missing ?
Re: network bandwith with em(4)
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:12:09 +0100 Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote: | On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 09:11:13AM +0100, Manuel Guesdon wrote: | On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 00:51:46 + (UTC) | Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote: | | | On 2011-02-28, Manuel Guesdon ml+openbsd.m...@oxymium.net wrote: | | http://www.oxymium.net/tmp/core3-dmesg | | | | ipmi0 at mainbus0: version 2.0 interface KCS iobase 0xca2/2 spacing 1 | | | | ipmi is disabled in GENERIC. have you tried without it? | | Not on this server (I can't reboot it often) but on another one with same | hardware: it doesn't seems to make difference (it still have Ierr). | | | This diff will help./sarcasm Of course and s/OpenBSD/FreeBSD/ may help too but none of these proposals seems very constructive. | I think we already mentioned it that you will always see Ierr. The | question is if the box is able to forward more then 150kpps. Yes that's one a the questions. We can divide it into 3 questions: 1) is the limitation comes from hardware ? 2) is the limitation comes from OpenBSD ? 3) is the limitation comes from the way OpenBSD exploit hardware. 1) Except if someone explain by a+b why the hardware can't forward this rate, I'm keep thinking it can do it (otherwise I don't see reason to sell quad 1Gbps nic). I'm ok to hear that I've purchased crappy motherboard card or nic (but I'd like to understand why they are crappy). The last 2 questions are still open in my mind. I've spent days and days making tests, searches, reading kernel source code and so on because I think it's interesting for the community to find where the problem come from and how to solve it (if possible). If finally the answer is that OpenBSD (or may be any other OS) can't forward more than 150kpps without losing 1 to 20 pps with this hardware, I'll live with it. But as we've already seen that increasing int/s improve performances (for good or bad reason), I keep thinking there's something to improve or fix but I may be wrong. Anyway, thank you for your work and help. Manuel -- __ Manuel Guesdon - OXYMIUM
Re: Clarifications on bridge and pf
I have a similar setup and I add each of the interfaces to a bridge
group in their hostname.if(5) files then I do my filtering on that
group in pf.conf.
-Nick
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of Christiano F. Haesbaert
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 7:48 AM
To: OpenBSD Questions
Subject: Clarifications on bridge and pf
Hi there,
Yesterday I tossed my switch in the bin and got a sun quad fast
ethernet to do it's job.
What I have is a bridged setup with an ip in hme1... I have now
something like this:
ext_if = hme0
bridge0 = { hme1, hme2, hme3, hme4 }
hme1 has ip 192.168.8.1
My concern is, how is pf semantics regarding traffic on the bridge ?
Should I match packets on bridge0 or on all of the hme ?
I've noticed the following, with rules like this:
block
pass on hme1
pass on bridge0
I could not get traffic from hosts in hme2 to hme3 for example.
Although the 'pass on bridge0 allowed multicast to travel through
bridge.
Eventually I did something like pass on { hme1 hme2 hme3 hme4 }
So it seems multicast matches bridge0, while normal unicast traffic does
not.
I'm new to pf, read the manual but that didn't become clear to me.
What am I missing ?
The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is intended
only for the use of the recipient(s) named above, and may be legally
privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and
destroy or delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer
system. If you have any questions concerning this message, please contact the
sender.
[BEWARE] David J. Moore
This is the man who poisoned DroneBL. He is a bad man. Keep your children safe. http://raged.tittybang.org/ Leon Leon Kaiser - Head of GNAA Public Relations - litera...@gnaa.eu || litera...@goatse.fr http://gnaa.eu || http://security.goatse.fr 7BEECD8D FCBED526 F7960173 459111CE F01F9923 The mask of anonymity is not intensely constructive. -- Andrew weev Auernheimer kunwon1: what a bad man ``kunwon1'' aka David J. Moore is a mentally unstable chatter found on irc.freenode.net ##politics, where he frequently promotes racism, bigotry, and his own extremist political views. He is a violent felon, a pedophile, and a drug addict. Keep this sick, sick man away from your children at all costs. In addition to being a violent sex offender, he is a devout Muslim and deeply closeted homosexual. kunwon1: confirmed sex offender If you let David J. Moore anywhere near your children, there is no doubt in my mind that your child will soon become a rape victim. This is a very sick man who belongs in prison, not on IRC. Quick Facts about David J. Moore: Violent Sex Fiend * David J. Moore is responsible for 88% of all 'Amber Alerts. * There are literally hundreds of reported instances of Moore molesting children. * Authorities suspect that Moore keeps over 30 children locked in his basement, based on the screams neighbors frequently report to the police. * Moore was once described as calling a 4-year-old girl very molestable, and a 7-month-old boy as a hot piece of ass. * It is rumored that he is responsible for 45% of all child abuse in his county, and that 40% of all child pornography on the Internet can be traced back to him. * There is not a second in the day where David J. Moore does not lust after children. kunwon1: Junkie Labeled a pedophile and shunned by neighbors and peers alike, David J. Moore turned to drugs for companionship. After years of injecting Heroin and other opiates into his veins, it began to get harder to find a good vein to shoot up in. Moore was forced to turn to other drugs to fill the void in his life that Heroin once did. Drugs that David J. Moore is addicted to * Crack Cocaine * Marijuana * Morphine * LSD * Speed * Crystal Meth * Vicodin * Heroin * DXM * Ketamine * Steroids * Peyote * Salvia * Ecstacy * Shrooms * Oxycodone * Klonopin * Methadone * Ayahuasca * Adrenochrome Moore has also been known to huff raid from time to time. kunwon1: soft chatter Warning! The text that follows may be disturbing and thus unsuitable for younger viewers. If you are under the age of 18, or are offended at any time, please press the ``back'' button on your web browser. Click here for examples of kunwon1's deviant chatting. 15:39:49 ,---Whois-- kunwon1 [~kunwon1@unaffiliated/kunwon1] 15:39:49 |gecos : Specialization is for Insects 15:39:50 | channels : #freenode @##child_pic_swap ##politics @##narco_trade ##politics-outcast +##infant-sex-workers ##gaydads4sons @#child_porn_dungeon 15:39:50 | server : brown.freenode.net (Madison, WI, US) 15:39:50 | : is using a secure connection 15:39:50 | idle : 0 days 0 hours 2 mins 40 secs (signon: Mon Feb 28 15:09:52 2011) 15:39:50 | account : kunwon1 15:39:50 `--
Re: network bandwith with em(4)
- Original Message - | On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 09:11:13AM +0100, Manuel Guesdon wrote: | On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 00:51:46 + (UTC) | Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote: | | | On 2011-02-28, Manuel Guesdon ml+openbsd.m...@oxymium.net | | wrote: | | http://www.oxymium.net/tmp/core3-dmesg | | | | ipmi0 at mainbus0: version 2.0 interface KCS iobase 0xca2/2 | | spacing 1 | | | | ipmi is disabled in GENERIC. have you tried without it? | | Not on this server (I can't reboot it often) but on another one with | same | hardware: it doesn't seems to make difference (it still have Ierr). | | | This diff will help./sarcasm | I think we already mentioned it that you will always see Ierr. The | question is if the box is able to forward more then 150kpps. | | -- | :wq Claudio | | Index: if_em.c | === | RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_em.c,v | retrieving revision 1.249 | diff -u -p -r1.249 if_em.c | --- if_em.c 13 Feb 2011 19:45:54 - 1.249 | +++ if_em.c 3 Mar 2011 10:01:39 - | @@ -3194,14 +3194,7 @@ em_update_stats_counters(struct em_softc | ifp-if_collisions = sc-stats.colc; | | /* Rx Errors */ | - ifp-if_ierrors = | - sc-dropped_pkts + | - sc-stats.rxerrc + | - sc-stats.crcerrs + | - sc-stats.algnerrc + | - sc-stats.ruc + sc-stats.roc + | - sc-stats.mpc + sc-stats.cexterr + | - sc-rx_overruns; | + ifp-if_ierrors = 0; | | /* Tx Errors */ | ifp-if_oerrors = sc-stats.ecol + sc-stats.latecol + Hey Claudio, Thanks! This diff helped and now my errors have gone to zero! LOL! That was funny. -- James A. Peltier IT Services - Research Computing Group Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpelt...@sfu.ca Website : http://www.sfu.ca/itservices http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier
Pk Chznqhkp
base64 encoded Mime section invalid - length (0) was wrong.
Re: network bandwith with em(4)
W dniu 2011-03-02 13:52, Ryan McBride pisze: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:49:01PM +0100, Manuel Guesdon wrote: OK. Anyway NIC buffers restrict buffered packets number. But the problem remain: why a (for exemple) dual Xeon E5520@2.27GHz with Intel PRO/1000 (82576) can't route 150kpps without Ierr :-) http://www.oxymium.net/tmp/core3-dmesg I've done some more comprehensive testing and talked to some other developers, and it seems that 150kpps is in the range of what is expected for such hardware with an unoptimized install. One thing that seems to have a big performance impact is net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen. If and only if your network cards are all supported by MCLGETI (ie, they show LWM/CWM/HWM values in 'systat mbufs', you can try increasing ifq.maxlen until you don't see net.inet.ip.ifq.drops incrementing anymore under constant load. On my test box here - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5140 @ 2.33GHz with em(4), pf disabled - increasing net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen to 8192 gets more than double the performance compared with the default of 256. We're looking at making the ifq.maxlen tune itself so you don't have to twiddle this knob anymore, not sure if and when that will happen though. I also have problems with bandwidth on em(4). On default clean 4.8 install i get 430Mbit/s. (with pf and altq enabled it's only 275Mbit/s). systat shows: 31.7%Int 62.1%Sys 0.0%Usr 0.0%Nic 6.2%Idle ||||||||||| === Interrupts 8025 total 100 clock 7921 em0 4 ichiic0 http://erydium.pl/upload/vmstat.gif http://erydium.pl/upload/systat.gif http://erydium.pl/upload/kern_profiling.txt my hardware: box: Lenovo ThinkCentre A51P nic: Intel PRO/1000 PT Desktop Adapter (PCIe, model: EXPI9300PTBLK) DMESG: OpenBSD 4.8 (KERN_PROF.PROF) #0: Thu Dec 30 13:25:40 CET 2010 r...@router-test.local.kig:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/KERN_PROF.PROF cpu0: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.80GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.80 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,TM2,CNXT-ID,xTPR real mem = 526938112 (502MB) avail mem = 508166144 (484MB) mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 05/10/07, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfd6dc, SMBIOS rev. 2.34 @ 0xefc60 (52 entries) bios0: vendor IBM version 2BKT52AUS date 05/10/2007 bios0: IBM 8422W4P acpi0 at bios0: rev 0 acpi0: sleep states S0 S1 S3 S4 S5 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP TCPA APIC BOOT MCFG acpi0: wakeup devices EXP0(S5) EXP1(S5) EXP2(S5) EXP3(S5) USB1(S3) USB2(S3) USB3(S3) USB4(S3) USBE(S3) SLOT(S5) KBC_(S3) PSM_(S3) COMA(S5) COMB(S5) acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: apic clock running at 133MHz ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 1 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEG_) acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 2 (EXP0) acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus -1 (EXP1) acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus -1 (EXP2) acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus -1 (EXP3) acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 10 (SLOT) acpicpu0 at acpi0 acpitz0 at acpi0: critical temperature 105 degC acpibtn0 at acpi0: PWRB bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xae00! 0xcb000/0x1000 0xcc000/0x2000 0xce000/0x800 0xce800/0x800 0xe/0x1! pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel 82915G Host rev 0x04 vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 Intel 82915G Video rev 0x04 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) intagp0 at vga1 agp0 at intagp0: aperture at 0xc000, size 0x1000 inteldrm0 at vga1: apic 1 int 16 (irq 5) drm0 at inteldrm0 ppb0 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 Intel 82801FB PCIE rev 0x03: apic 1 int 17 (irq 5) pci1 at ppb0 bus 2 em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/1000 PT (82572EI) rev 0x06: apic 1 int 16 (irq 5), address 00:1b:21:05:1f:39 uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: apic 1 int 23 (irq 11) uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: apic 1 int 19 (irq 9) uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: apic 1 int 18 (irq 10) uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 3 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: apic 1 int 16 (irq 5) ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: apic 1 int 23 (irq 11) usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub0 at usb0 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1 ppb1 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BA Hub-to-PCI rev 0xd3 pci2 at ppb1 bus 10 xl0 at pci2 dev 10 function 0 3Com 3c905C 100Base-TX rev 0x74: apic 1 int 22 (irq 3), address 00:04:76:0b:90:9f bmtphy0 at xl0 phy 24: 3C905C internal PHY, rev. 6 bge0 at pci2 dev 11 function 0 Broadcom BCM5705K rev 0x03, BCM5705 A3 (0x3003): apic 1 int 16 (irq 5), address 00:11:25:4f:9a:f4 brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5705 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 2 xl1 at pci2 dev 12 function 0 3Com 3c905C 100Base-TX rev 0x74: apic 1 int
Re: Would appreciate clarification on supported 10Gb Intel to resolve conflict between man and hardware section.
On 3/3/11 3:28 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote: On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 06:09:36PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to get some clarification on what would work and not for the 10Gb Intel network cards? I compare the man page, both man(4) ixgb and man(4) ix as well as the hardware section and looked at the data from Intel to find more in trying to answer that question. But I am still looking for confirmation of the support or not in OpenBSD for some of them. I get conflicting information and I am not sure what is real. The hardware compatible page do list: # Intel 82597 PRO/10GbE based PCI adapters (ixgb) # Intel 82598 PRO/10GbE based PCI adapters (ix) The man(4) ixgb show the 82597, fine. The man(4) ix does list the 82598AF, 82598EB, 82598AT and 82599EB as well and the X520 series SFP models, X520,DA2, X520-SR1, X520-SR2, X520-LR1 but not the RJ-45 model X520-T1 based on the same 82599ES. But again the man(4) ix do not list the 82599ES as a supported chipset, but that's what is in the X520 SFP series. The intel product documents are confused about which chips they use. The clearest split is something along the lines of: 7 82599EB -- PCI Express* (PCIe*) 2.0, dual port 10 Gigabit Ethernet controller 7 82599ES -- Serial 10 GbE backplane interface for blade implementations (includes the 82599EB SKU functionality plus serial). Well the document may be confused, but then, what am I suppose to used then? I used the documentation I can find and read it to find the answer. If that's also wrong, how am I suppose to find out then? I will go look for more technical specs sheet then, but still I would love to know the answer for sure if anyone actually know that first hand. I am confuse, the man page appear to be confuse, the Intel documentation is cnfuse based on what you say too. So, everyone is confuse. So, some clarification would be welcome. Looking more at Intel to try to figure this out here: http://download.intel.com/network/connectivity/products/prodbrf/252454.pdf I see all the listed model in the man page X520-DA2, X520-SR1, X520-SR2, X520-LR1 are all based on the 82599ES, but then the 82599ES is not listed in the chipset in that man page, however these cards works based on the man page and then the X520-T2 is also based on the same chip 82599ES as well. So, it should work right and should be in the list or am I missing something? What about the Intel 10 Gigabits AT2 then. It's designed with the 82598EB and that's on the man page, but not listed in hardware, anyone knows if that works or not? Based on the man page, the X520-T1 may be wouldn't work, but looking at what chip it used and what other model are supported it should also work. I would appreciate confirmation or denial here and possibly an update to the man page to clarify that? Anyone have one of these and can tell for sure if that's true or not? So, shouldn't the 82599ES be added to the man page if the X520 series are all supported then? And possibly the X520-T1 as well as it does use the same chipset, but only the difference in the connector or am I missing something here? I would appreciated some feedback either way as spending $600+ to find out if it doesn't is a bit hard. (; There are mentions of 82598 10GbaseT working, I don't see why 82599 10GbaseT wouldn't work off hand. That could well be, but I learn many years ago to do my homework first on hardware support with OpenBSD and even if that may well be possible, it doesn't make it so however. It's a bit pricey to find out if yes or no that would work, so that's why I asked first if someone n the know might have one first here. The analogies is the same, they have 82574 working, so why not the 82576 right? But it is not working as well and hardware wanted was fro the 82576 as well as for the 82580. The 82580 was taken care of a few weeks ago based on feedback on misc@. Anyway, thanks for your feedback, I appreciate it, but I would fell more comfortable to be in the know I must say and I am not. Best and thanks for your time. Best, Daniel
Re: Would appreciate clarification on supported 10Gb Intel to resolve conflict between man and hardware section.
Hi Jonathan, The intel product documents are confused about which chips they use. The clearest split is something along the lines of: 7 82599EB -- PCI Express* (PCIe*) 2.0, dual port 10 Gigabit Ethernet controller 7 82599ES -- Serial 10 GbE backplane interface for blade implementations (includes the 82599EB SKU functionality plus serial). I read this again slower this time. First time I assume you wrote the 82598EB and 82599ES. Sorry about my bad ready here. I guess I spend to many days trying to find out and get all my chipset number confuse agian. In any case if I understand you properly as the Serial one are working, there isn't any reason that the other wouldn't as it's the same chipset basically without the added serial part? And as the serial SFP model are working already then this wold be find too? There are mentions of 82598 10GbaseT working, I don't see why 82599 10GbaseT wouldn't work off hand. On this one, I will make a leap of fate here. I suppose you are right. Would be nice to know for sure anyway. The only way to know if for me to gt one I guess and test it for real. Best, Daniel
Re: Sun Netra X1 still get dc0: watchdog timeout and crash on current
Daniel,
Can you try this diff? It won't get rid of the watchdog timeout, but
hopefully it will prevent the DMA error.
Index: dc.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/ic/dc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.116
diff -u -p -r1.116 dc.c
--- dc.c5 Aug 2010 07:57:04 - 1.116
+++ dc.c3 Mar 2011 20:22:12 -
@@ -3059,6 +3059,7 @@ void
dc_stop(struct dc_softc *sc, int softonly)
{
struct ifnet *ifp;
+ u_int32_t isr;
int i;
ifp = sc-sc_arpcom.ac_if;
@@ -3070,6 +3071,28 @@ dc_stop(struct dc_softc *sc, int softonl
if (!softonly) {
DC_CLRBIT(sc, DC_NETCFG, (DC_NETCFG_RX_ON|DC_NETCFG_TX_ON));
+
+ for (i = 0; i DC_TIMEOUT; i++) {
+ isr = CSR_READ_4(sc, DC_ISR);
+ if ((isr DC_ISR_TX_IDLE ||
+ (isr DC_ISR_TX_STATE) == DC_TXSTATE_RESET)
+ (isr DC_ISR_RX_STATE) == DC_RXSTATE_STOPPED)
+ break;
+ DELAY(10);
+ }
+
+ if (i == DC_TIMEOUT) {
+ if (!((isr DC_ISR_TX_IDLE) ||
+ (isr DC_ISR_TX_STATE) == DC_TXSTATE_RESET)
+ !DC_IS_ASIX(sc) !DC_IS_DAVICOM(sc))
+ printf(%s: failed to force tx to idle state\n,
+ sc-sc_dev.dv_xname);
+ if (!((isr DC_ISR_RX_STATE) == DC_RXSTATE_STOPPED)
+ !DC_HAS_BROKEN_RXSTATE(sc))
+ printf(%s: failed to force rx to idle state\n,
+ sc-sc_dev.dv_xname);
+ }
+
CSR_WRITE_4(sc, DC_IMR, 0x);
CSR_WRITE_4(sc, DC_TXADDR, 0x);
CSR_WRITE_4(sc, DC_RXADDR, 0x);
Re: Would appreciate clarification on supported 10Gb Intel to resolve conflict between man and hardware section.
On 3/3/11 3:16 PM, FRLinux wrote: On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Daniel Ouelletdan...@presscom.net wrote: On this one, I will make a leap of fate here. I suppose you are right. Would be nice to know for sure anyway. The only way to know if for me to gt one I guess and test it for real. leap of faith you mean? :D Yes I guess you are right! (; Many wrong words in my text, but I try. At a minimum, you got the meaning of it. Read phonetic and you will get it! (; Sorry about that. But you got my drift anyway Best, Daniel
Re: Would appreciate clarification on supported 10Gb Intel to resolve conflict between man and hardware section.
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 02:35:58PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: There are mentions of 82598 10GbaseT working, I don't see why 82599 10GbaseT wouldn't work off hand. That could well be, but I learn many years ago to do my homework first on hardware support with OpenBSD and even if that may well be possible, it doesn't make it so however. It's a bit pricey to find out if yes or no that would work, so that's why I asked first if someone n the know might have one first here. The analogies is the same, they have 82574 working, so why not the 82576 right? But it is not working as well and hardware wanted was fro the 82576 as well as for the 82580. The 82580 was taken care of a few weeks ago based on feedback on misc@. The 82599ES and 82599EB are essentially the same chip, it should work fine and if not I expect it will only need minor changes. ix still needs to be introduced to ifmedia properly though so the media state may not be shown properly but this is a problem shared by everything supported by ix and the link will still work. The 82576 is quite different to 82574 it is closer in design to the ix chips (as is the 82575). The 82580 is almost malicously different to other em chips and is the source of some pain to me. I have parts of it working but not all of it.
Re: Would appreciate clarification on supported 10Gb Intel to resolve conflict between man and hardware section.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net wrote: On this one, I will make a leap of fate here. I suppose you are right. Would be nice to know for sure anyway. The only way to know if for me to gt one I guess and test it for real. leap of faith you mean? :D Steph
Re: Would appreciate clarification on supported 10Gb Intel to resolve conflict between man and hardware section.
On 3/3/11 3:51 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote: On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 02:35:58PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: There are mentions of 82598 10GbaseT working, I don't see why 82599 10GbaseT wouldn't work off hand. That could well be, but I learn many years ago to do my homework first on hardware support with OpenBSD and even if that may well be possible, it doesn't make it so however. It's a bit pricey to find out if yes or no that would work, so that's why I asked first if someone n the know might have one first here. The analogies is the same, they have 82574 working, so why not the 82576 right? But it is not working as well and hardware wanted was fro the 82576 as well as for the 82580. The 82580 was taken care of a few weeks ago based on feedback on misc@. The 82599ES and 82599EB are essentially the same chip, it should work fine and if not I expect it will only need minor changes. ix still needs to be introduced to ifmedia properly though so the media state may not be shown properly but this is a problem shared by everything supported by ix and the link will still work. The 82576 is quite different to 82574 it is closer in design to the ix chips (as is the 82575). The 82580 is almost malicously different to other em chips and is the source of some pain to me. I have parts of it working but not all of it. Many thanks for your details. I will fly with it and see then.
change cwm screensaver?
Hi, Is there a way to easily change the cwm screensaver? It's not in the man pages or the archives. (Daft, I know. And petty.) ==ml -- Michael W. Lucas http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/, http://blather.MichaelWLucas.com/ Latest book: Network Flow Analysis http://www.networkflowanalysis.com/ mwlu...@blackhelicopters.org, Twitter @mwlauthor
Re: change cwm screensaver?
Hi Michael, Is there a way to easily change the cwm screensaver? It's not in the man pages or the archives. (Daft, I know. And petty.) from cwmrc(5): The name entries term and lock have a special meaning. They point to the terminal and screen locking programs specified by keybindings. The defaults are xterm(1) and xlock(1), respectively. -- Anthony J. Bentley
