Re: Difference between NN and IE
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, G.W. Haywood wrote: > Hi there, > > On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Scott Alexander wrote: > > > Why is it Netscape displays the pop up authenticate window when the > > user enters the wrong password. But Internet Explorer displays my > > 401.html page if I return an AUTH_REQUIRED; from my AuthAny.pm > > This really isn't the place to discuss the multitude of differences > between and faults in browsers. You will certainly find more as you > travel this path. All you can do is try to code in such a way as to > offer your users as little frustration as possible. > > For some insights into browsers and their ways, see for example > "Professional JavaScript" ISBN 1-861002-70-X. Sorry to remain off topic, but I also have a book recommendation for these sorts of things - O'Reilly's "Dynamic HTML" (might be Dynamic XHTML these days :-). -- /||** Founder and CTO ** ** http://axkit.com/ ** //||** AxKit.com Ltd ** ** XML Application Serving ** // ||** http://axkit.org ** ** XSLT, XPathScript, XSP ** // \\| // ** mod_perl news and resources: http://take23.org ** \\// //\\ // \\
Re: Difference between NN and IE
Hi there, On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Scott Alexander wrote: > Why is it Netscape displays the pop up authenticate window when the > user enters the wrong password. But Internet Explorer displays my > 401.html page if I return an AUTH_REQUIRED; from my AuthAny.pm This really isn't the place to discuss the multitude of differences between and faults in browsers. You will certainly find more as you travel this path. All you can do is try to code in such a way as to offer your users as little frustration as possible. For some insights into browsers and their ways, see for example "Professional JavaScript" ISBN 1-861002-70-X. 73, Ged.
Difference between NN and IE
Hi, Why is it Netscape displays the pop up authenticate window when the user enters the wrong password. But Internet Explorer displays my 401.html page if I return an AUTH_REQUIRED; from my AuthAny.pm handler? If I click on the pop up window cancel in Netscape then it will display the 401.html page. With Explorer the user actually has to close all Explorer Windows and start it again to get another attempt at logging in. regards and thanks in advance Scott
Re: difference between ...
On Wed, 24 May 2000, David Hajoglou wrote: > Would there ever be any difference between the output of the following: > > (looking on the mod_perl quick reference card) > > >From Apache::URI > $str = $uri->query() > > > >From Request object > $str = $r->args(); > > As far as what they hold about the request, would these ever differ, or > do they access the same data (in different ways)? they are the same, see http_protocol.c: r->args = r->parsed_uri.query;
difference between ...
Would there ever be any difference between the output of the following: (looking on the mod_perl quick reference card) >From Apache::URI $str = $uri->query() >From Request object $str = $r->args(); As far as what they hold about the request, would these ever differ, or do they access the same data (in different ways)? Thanks David
Re: performance difference between apache/perl modules and registry scripts question
Greg Cope wrote: > > Dear All > > I have been asked to code several apache / perl modules. > > these module accept a "post" consisting of a long string - do a few database > things and return a long string to the browser. > > What are the advantages of using apache / mod_perl modules vs using a > registry / mod_perl style CGI script. > Too see how much slower Registry scripts are than raw mod_perl handlers, worst case for small scripts, check out the benchmarks at: http://www.chamas.com/hello_world.html Looks like a 20-30% difference in setup overhead per request. -- Joshua _ Joshua Chamas Chamas Enterprises Inc. NODEWORKS >> free web link monitoring Huntington Beach, CA USA http://www.nodeworks.com1-562-683-2142
Re: performance difference between apache/perl modules and registry scripts question
This has been discussed on the list before. Please have a look at the archive and see if it answers your question. - Perrin On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Greg Cope wrote: > Dear All > > I have been asked to code several apache / perl modules. > > these module accept a "post" consisting of a long string - do a few database > things and return a long string to the browser. > > What are the advantages of using apache / mod_perl modules vs using a > registry / mod_perl style CGI script. > > General memory use / efficiency are an issue and that is why I am being > asked to do modules as registry / cgi.pm is seen as"too slow". > > I would prefer registry / cgi.pm as this is easier to code! (being > lazy:-) > > Any thoughts / experiences would be appreciated > > Thanks > > Greg Cope >
performance difference between apache/perl modules and registry scripts question
Dear All I have been asked to code several apache / perl modules. these module accept a "post" consisting of a long string - do a few database things and return a long string to the browser. What are the advantages of using apache / mod_perl modules vs using a registry / mod_perl style CGI script. General memory use / efficiency are an issue and that is why I am being asked to do modules as registry / cgi.pm is seen as"too slow". I would prefer registry / cgi.pm as this is easier to code! (being lazy:-) Any thoughts / experiences would be appreciated Thanks Greg Cope