Re: Basic auth with SSL - again

1999-03-24 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall

On Tue, Mar 23, 1999, Achille M. Luongo wrote:

   I installed Apache/1.3.3 (Win32) mod_ssl/mod_ssl/2.1b8 SSLeay/0.9.0b.
  
  2.1b8? Oh, that's really _OLD_, I hope you now this.  I've no clue on your
  problem, but this is the first version which ran on Win32, so I strongly
  suggest that you upgrade to 2.2.5. Because the chance is high that this was
  implicitly solved by the changes since 2.1b8.
 
   Thanks for the answer, Ralf. My problem is that I can't build
 applications under Win32 platform.
 
   Is anybody able to build and uplownload on
 ftp://contrib:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sw/mod_ssl/ (read/write
 access). an update version of Apache (Win32) with mod_ssl/mod_ssl/2.2.5
 ?

Perhaps one of the Win32 users can put a binary there.  I cannot do it,
because my Win32 box is still totally messed up. 

   Ralf S. Engelschall
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   www.engelschall.com
__
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: GSID, mod_ssl and Apache...

1999-03-24 Thread Patrik Carlsson

Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:

 Then this is a client problem! The server cannot do anything here. At least
 Netscape is very smart and remembers that he is reconnecting to a server with
 a GlobalID cert and then _immediately_ starts with a strong cipher and never
 does the stepup again (at least not until it's restarted or the server cert
 changes). But I've not tried this with IE. But its Microsoft, what have you
 expected...

Yes I know, it's a client problem.
...and Microsoft... nothing more to say about them...

Thanks for your replies, it's always good to hear someone else explain what
you already suspects.

--Patrik



__
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: POST problem

1999-03-24 Thread Tony Locke

Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
 Ok, then I've to check now POST+keepalive+redirection, too.  What a nice thing
 that the HTTP protocol makes has such a lot of esoteric combinations
 possibleI'll investigate when I find time.

Just FYI, i've also come across the POST+keepalive+redirection problem. I think
i'm right in saying it's still a problem because i can't see it in the changes
for 2.2.6.

thanks,

Tony.
--

-
Tony Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmer, Open World Limited
-
__
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[BugDB] OpenSSL: error:140943FC:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 (PR#133)

1999-03-24 Thread bugdb-mod-ssl

Full_Name: Andre Albuquerque
Version: 2.2.6-1.3.6
OS: Linux 2.0.36
Submission from: (NULL) (161.148.222.154)


I have just installed the new mod_ssl-2.2.6-1.3.6 with the new 
apache 1.3.6 distrib and openssl 0.9.2b, but, depite of a clean 
compiling, I have the following error while trying to get
a page:

[Wed Mar 24 08:48:23 1999] [error] mod_ssl: SSL handshake failed (client
161.148.222.154, server www
s.visualnet.com.br:443) (OpenSSL library error follows)
[Wed Mar 24 08:48:23 1999] [error] OpenSSL: error:140943FC:SSL
routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 alert
bad record mac

Is it a mod_ssl error or an openssl error?

BTW: my system have the following conf:

Linux 2.0.36 (i386)
Apache/1.3.6 
mod_ssl/2.2.6 
OpenSSL/0.9.2b 
PHP/3.0.7

Thanks in advance, Gustavo

__
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.2.5-1.3.4

1999-03-24 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall

On Fri, Mar 19, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 "Ralf S. Engelschall" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 *) The SSLCertificateFile and SSLCertificateKeyFile directives now can read
PEM (=DER+Base64+headers), DER+Base64 (without headers) and plain DER
format certificate and private key files. This is mostly provided for
convinience reasons.
 
 I haven't spent much more time on this, sorry, but I still cannot get this
 to work. Using Ralf's patch from last week, there appears to be a problem
 with how the private key is being read.
 
 Just for kicks, I went and got the latest versions of mod_ssl and OpenSSL
 via rsync last night and tried again. (I built directly out of pkg.apache.)
 This time I dump core on startup.
 
 I would appreciate it if someone who has this working successfully, try
 this out with the provided _sample_ server cert and key. The second cert is
 the ca cert used to issue the server cert. And let me know how it goes. 

 [...]
 -BEGIN ENCRYPTED PRIVATE KEY-
 MIIBeDAaBgkqhkiG9w0BBQMwDQQIS0XKnH4OhTICAQUEggFY7p+anDqPJaJbDQMC
 CSqitvjPRt1kg1O98O4bnB+GYiGMZPeFEB537OvRsyrhOpDHaV/JD+c4eMwshgVU
 UUbaXqURzSi2vIV8LfCHUzjtQciJSjL721MHeyhN1z+rILFD8CmXDB2DV/NYjb28
 uVuU7ESIUnfKakRTJz6npj58DvpLJ/DaHJUp9/ap+EYrKgxFf3+A6Nnvr3vRLq1p
 HYngIgSqWDCD9csCrGv9Yu1KCU+ht35nLHbf2+AnLgDtTxHZM2tEh6yhMt/9298L
 HeTygTgcPHjsRd5uv6J3DSQm3Hx90lHrvXCgliL7x1zXbZWKW50D1ZFke2QGJzW9
 l5xZJ7mVMEgjp8KNB/dx2kwE+zeFCQUZYkfnoy36iCsshVZVV5lQEyL553jL71y5
 xdLxh6q/RhVO/UEnFM9Jk0QjxcVwIoNhjhc08ZmaeODm9QnWRCqtb9A7G9c=
 -END ENCRYPTED PRIVATE KEY-

Yeah, the problem is that OpenSSL doesn't know these "ENCRYPTED PRIVATE KEY"
headers. Mod_ssl cannot change this, of course.  The question now is: From
where do they come, i.e. which program created this format?  And what's in
this container? Just a Base64-encoded DER key?

   Ralf S. Engelschall
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   www.engelschall.com
__
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [BugDB] OpenSSL: error:140943FC:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 (PR#133)

1999-03-24 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall

On Wed, Mar 24, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Full_Name: Andre Albuquerque
 Version: 2.2.6-1.3.6
 OS: Linux 2.0.36
 Submission from: (NULL) (161.148.222.154)
 
 I have just installed the new mod_ssl-2.2.6-1.3.6 with the new 
 apache 1.3.6 distrib and openssl 0.9.2b, but, depite of a clean 
 compiling, I have the following error while trying to get
 a page:
 
 [Wed Mar 24 08:48:23 1999] [error] mod_ssl: SSL handshake failed (client
 161.148.222.154, server www
 s.visualnet.com.br:443) (OpenSSL library error follows)
 [Wed Mar 24 08:48:23 1999] [error] OpenSSL: error:140943FC:SSL
 routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 alert
 bad record mac
 
 Is it a mod_ssl error or an openssl error?

H I've only the following ideas for you:

1. When this isn't Linux on a Intel box make sure you've built OpenSSL
   correctly. Usually on Alpha boxes you need to use a different platform id.

2. Make sure OpenSSL works correctly by running "make test"
   after "make" inside the OpenSSL source tree.

3. Try to build OpenSSL without assembler stuff

4. Try to connect to the server with "openssl s_client" to make sure 
   your browser isn't broken.

Greetings,
   Ralf S. Engelschall
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   www.engelschall.com
__
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [BugDB] OpenSSL: error:140943FC:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 (PR#133)

1999-03-24 Thread Andre Gustavo de Carvalho Albuquerque

At 15:44 24/03/1999 +0100, you wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Full_Name: Andre Albuquerque
 Version: 2.2.6-1.3.6
 OS: Linux 2.0.36
 Submission from: (NULL) (161.148.222.154)
 
 I have just installed the new mod_ssl-2.2.6-1.3.6 with the new 
 apache 1.3.6 distrib and openssl 0.9.2b, but, depite of a clean 
 compiling, I have the following error while trying to get
 a page:
 
 [Wed Mar 24 08:48:23 1999] [error] mod_ssl: SSL handshake failed (client
 161.148.222.154, server www
 s.visualnet.com.br:443) (OpenSSL library error follows)
 [Wed Mar 24 08:48:23 1999] [error] OpenSSL: error:140943FC:SSL
 routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 alert
 bad record mac
 
 Is it a mod_ssl error or an openssl error?

H I've only the following ideas for you:

1. When this isn't Linux on a Intel box make sure you've built OpenSSL
   correctly. Usually on Alpha boxes you need to use a different platform id.


  It is an Intel box (Linux 2.0.36 i386)

2. Make sure OpenSSL works correctly by running "make test"
   after "make" inside the OpenSSL source tree.


  It worked correctly. I've done this test.

3. Try to build OpenSSL without assembler stuff

4. Try to connect to the server with "openssl s_client" to make sure 
   your browser isn't broken.

  Ok Ralf, I'm going to test this as soon as possible.
  I've tested with netscape 4.5 and MSIE 4.0 (4.72.3110.8), both for WinNt
4.0.

  Thanks, Gustavo
__
Andre Gustavo de C. Albuquerque   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key:http://www.visualnet.com.br/~gustavo/pgpkey.asc
__
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Basic auth with SSL - again

1999-03-24 Thread Trung Tran-Duc

   "Ralf S. Engelschall" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 [...]
 
  Thanks for the answer, Ralf. My problem is that I can't build
  applications under Win32 platform.
  
  Is anybody able to build and uplownload on
  ftp://contrib:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sw/mod_ssl/ (read/write
  access). an update version of Apache (Win32) with mod_ssl/mod_ssl/2.2.5
  ?
 
 Perhaps one of the Win32 users can put a binary there.  I cannot do it,
 because my Win32 box is still totally messed up. 

I've uploaded

Apache_1.3.6-mod_ssl_2.2.6-openssl_0.9.2b-WIN32-i386.zip

to the contrib area.

(The mod_proxy source was patched to fix one crash bug and a bug preventing
cache GC from functioning)

__
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



2.2.6-1.3.6 problems

1999-03-24 Thread Magnus Stenman

I'm having some strange problems...

When compiling for the mod_ssl-2.2.6-1.3.6 RPMs
I get a server that works with
Win Netscape 4
Win M$IE 4,

but *not* with
Mac Netscape 4.5
Linux Netscape 4.08
(ssl connections that is, normal connections work fine)


I use Redhat 5.2, kernel 2.2.4, openssl 0.9.1c
(yeah, I know, but I did not find .2b RPMs
 and was lazy [could the former be the problem?])

Entries in ssl_engine.log:
[info]  Connection to child 2 established (server starbug.inbox.se:443)
[info]  SSL handshake stopped: connection was closed

Netscape pops up a dialog
"Netscape has encountered bad data from the server."

No errors in httpd error_log


/magnus
__
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [BugDB] Mod_SSL and PHP 3.0.7? (PR#132)

1999-03-24 Thread John Hoffmann

On Wed, Mar 24, 1999 at 08:22:06AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 24, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Full_Name: John Hoffmann
  Version: 2.2.5-1.3.4
  OS: Solaris 2.6
  Submission from: stargate.trytel.com (209.167.85.20)
  
  I'm trying to switch from StrongHold 2.4 to Apache 1.3.4 with
  mod_ssl, and I must say the installation went 200 times easier.  
  One thing I am having a problem with however is getting PHP 3 to 
  work at all.
  
  I recently compiled StrongHold with mod_auth_mysql-2.20, php 2.01
  and php 3.0.7 and it worked fine, but when I compile these same
  modules into Apache 1.3.4 with mod_ssl the php3 engine seems to die.
  When accessing a .php3 page I simply get a "The document contains no
  data".  PHP 2 pages work fine.  I've checked my configuration:
  
  srm.conf:AddType application/x-httpd-php3 .php3
  
  But no PHP 3 pages will return any data.  Any ideas at all?
 
 No, I'm neither using PHP3 myself nor have deep experiences with it, so I
 cannot help you very much. But because this doesn't look like it's really
 mod_ssl related, I recommend you to write to the PHP3 support mailing lists.
 
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
 

The problem turns out to be a limit on the file descriptors that each process
can open, I removed some VirtualHosts and it worked, now to figure out how
to increase the limit on Solaris 2.6 ... anyways, thanks for the quick 
response, much faster than the Stronghold Commercial team ;')

-- 
John Hoffmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OpenSSl 0.9.2b test failed

1999-03-24 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall

On Wed, Mar 24, 1999, Igor S. Livshits wrote:

 I am attempting to upgrade to mod-ssl-2.2.6-1.3.6 and am having 
 problems building openssl-0.9.2b. Configuration and compilation seems 
 to go fine, but when I run the tests, I get this failure:
 
 ./rsa_oaep_test
 Decryption failed!
 Decryption failed!
 Decryption failed!
 make[1]: *** [test_rsa] Error 1
 
 I am trying this on a RedHat 5.2 system with the following flags:
 
 perl Configure linux-elf -DRSAref -lRSAglue 
 -L`pwd`/../rsaref-2.0/local/ -lrsaref
 
 I'd appreciate any hints...

The RSA OEAP stuff is brand new. Nevertheless I guess the actual source of
your problem is the RSAref library.  Compile without it and try again. I'm 95%
sure then it will work. If not, you can try to contact Ulf Moeller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] which wrote this stuff. Perhaps he has a clue why it could fail
for you...
   Ralf S. Engelschall
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   www.engelschall.com
__
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Now I can be my own CA but there's more...

1999-03-24 Thread Juan Carlos Castro y Castro

Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
 
 Juan Carlos Castro y Castro wrote:
 
  Hi! I just bought a Brazilian RH Linux distribution with Apache 1.3.3
  and mod_ssl 2.0.something. When I follow the instructions to create my
  own CA and sign the server certificate I just created, I get this in the
  verification phase:
 
  error 7 at 0 depth lookup:certificate signature failure
 
 there is not a problem wit your distribution.. there is a strange "bug"
 on ssleay/openssl which doesn't allow the same values for a server.crt
 and a ca.crt
 so if you wan't to selfsigned your certify you need to change the values
 you are putting on both certicates
 
 i've learned this the difficult way.., should be on the FAQ, you could
 get a clue if you check the list archives

YES! It worked! THANK YOU! Now I stumbled on an ugly thing: while
Netscape issues me a warning and allows me to proceed until the
certificate expires, IE 3 disallows access altogether. Anyway I can hack
the Registry or something like that so IE3/4/5 users can go to my site?
Like, adding my phony CA to IE's list of CAs?

By the way, is there such hack to Netscape too?

Cya,
-- 
 ___THE___  One man alone cannot fight the future. USE LINUX!
 \  \ /  /   ___
  \  V  /   |Juan Carlos Castro y Castro|
   \   /|[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
   /   \|Linuxeiro, alvinegro, X-Phile e Carioca Folgado|
  /  ^  \   |Diretor de Informática e Eventos Sobrenaturais |
 /  / \  \  |da E-RACE CORPORATION  |
 ~~~   ~~~   ---
   RACER
__
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [BugDB] https only sends 65536 bytes (PR#134)

1999-03-24 Thread Allan Liska

Sounds more like an MTU problem.  Perhaps the MTU for port 443 is set to
a lower number than for port 80 on your router?

HTH


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Full_Name: Paul Curtis
 Version: mod_ssl/2.2.2 SSLeay/0.9.0b
 OS: Linux
 Submission from: nyor1ts1.ny.us.ibm.net (165.87.14.10)
 
 A large PDF file, ~221KB, gets truncated at 65536 bytes.
 There are no errors logged, the access log shows a completed
 request delivering 65536 bytes.
 
 The problem does not occur when the file is requested via a
 non-SSL URL.
 


Thanks,

allan
---
Allan Liska   Spectrum Computers
http://www.spectrum-computers.com http://www.webcreations-va.com
If I don't document something, it's usually either for a good reason,
or a bad reason.   -- Larry Wall
__
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OpenSSl 0.9.2b test failed

1999-03-24 Thread Ed Kubaitis

(Hi Igor)

This is almost certainly a problem due to building openssl-0.9.2b
with RSAref. The problem is that OAEP is a new RSA "encryption
scheme" defined in RFC2347 dated October 1998. RSAref 2.0
appears to date back to 1994.

My fond hope here is that the "make test" failure is a
minor oversight (forgetting to skip invocation of
rsa_oaep_test when -DRSAref is used.) I just commented
out the invocation of it in test/Makefile.ssl and got
through the rest of "make test" (and "apps/openssl speed")
without problems.

Hope to try out mod-ssl-2.2.6-1.3.6 + openssl-0.9.2b
+ rsaref-2.0 on a production server tomorrow morning to
see if my fond hope is wrong.

Two background URLs:

   http://www.progressive-comp.com/Lists/?l=openssl-devm=92211886324200w=2
   http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/htbin/rfc/rfc2437.html

Ed
--
Ed Kubaitis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCSO - University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign


"Ralf S. Engelschall" wrote:
 
 On Wed, Mar 24, 1999, Igor S. Livshits wrote:
 
  I am attempting to upgrade to mod-ssl-2.2.6-1.3.6 and am having
  problems building openssl-0.9.2b. Configuration and compilation seems
  to go fine, but when I run the tests, I get this failure:
 
  ./rsa_oaep_test
  Decryption failed!
  Decryption failed!
  Decryption failed!
  make[1]: *** [test_rsa] Error 1
 
  I am trying this on a RedHat 5.2 system with the following flags:
 
  perl Configure linux-elf -DRSAref -lRSAglue
  -L`pwd`/../rsaref-2.0/local/ -lrsaref
 
  I'd appreciate any hints...
 
 The RSA OEAP stuff is brand new. Nevertheless I guess the actual source of
 your problem is the RSAref library.  Compile without it and try again. I'm 95%
 sure then it will work. If not, you can try to contact Ulf Moeller
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] which wrote this stuff. Perhaps he has a clue why it could fail
 for you...
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
 ...

--
Ed Kubaitis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCSO - University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
__
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Basic auth with SSL - again

1999-03-24 Thread Achille M. Luongo

Trung Tran-Duc ha scritto:
 
"Ralf S. Engelschall" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  [...]
   Thanks for the answer, Ralf. My problem is that I can't build
   applications under Win32 platform.
  
   Is anybody able to build and uplownload on
   ftp://contrib:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sw/mod_ssl/ (read/write
   access). an update version of Apache (Win32) with mod_ssl/mod_ssl/2.2.5
   ?
 
  Perhaps one of the Win32 users can put a binary there.  I cannot do it,
  because my Win32 box is still totally messed up.
 
 I've uploaded
 
 Apache_1.3.6-mod_ssl_2.2.6-openssl_0.9.2b-WIN32-i386.zip
 
 to the contrib area.
 
 (The mod_proxy source was patched to fix one crash bug and a bug preventing
 cache GC from functioning)

Thanks for the upload: I installed it and Apache works fine on my
system, too. 

As Ralf forecasted, the current version of mod-ssl fixes the
authentication problem I found on the old version of mod-ssl and that I
reported few days ago.

Bye, Achille.
__
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Now I can be my own CA but there's more...

1999-03-24 Thread Lin Geng

What are the "VALUE"s that you refered?

( ...so if you wan't to selfsigned your certify you need to change the
values
 you are putting on both certicates)

Thanks.

-Original Message-
From: Juan Carlos Castro y Castro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, March 24, 1999 4:10 PM
Subject: Now I can be my own CA but there's more...


Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:

 Juan Carlos Castro y Castro wrote:
 
  Hi! I just bought a Brazilian RH Linux distribution with Apache 1.3.3
  and mod_ssl 2.0.something. When I follow the instructions to create my
  own CA and sign the server certificate I just created, I get this in
the
  verification phase:
 
  error 7 at 0 depth lookup:certificate signature failure

 there is not a problem wit your distribution.. there is a strange "bug"
 on ssleay/openssl which doesn't allow the same values for a server.crt
 and a ca.crt
 so if you wan't to selfsigned your certify you need to change the values
 you are putting on both certicates

 i've learned this the difficult way.., should be on the FAQ, you could
 get a clue if you check the list archives

YES! It worked! THANK YOU! Now I stumbled on an ugly thing: while
Netscape issues me a warning and allows me to proceed until the
certificate expires, IE 3 disallows access altogether. Anyway I can hack
the Registry or something like that so IE3/4/5 users can go to my site?
Like, adding my phony CA to IE's list of CAs?

By the way, is there such hack to Netscape too?

Cya,
--
 ___THE___  One man alone cannot fight the future. USE LINUX!
 \  \ /  /   ___
  \  V  /   |Juan Carlos Castro y Castro|
   \   /|[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
   /   \|Linuxeiro, alvinegro, X-Phile e Carioca Folgado|
  /  ^  \   |Diretor de Informática e Eventos Sobrenaturais |
 /  / \  \  |da E-RACE CORPORATION  |
 ~~~   ~~~   ---
   RACER
__
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]