Re: Apache warning: Connection refused: connect to listener

2003-10-31 Thread Alex Hart
I know everyone forgot about this already, but I still have this problem. I was hoping 
the new release of apache (2.0.48) would somehow fix this, but it didn't.

To rehash, apache works fine, but when I run with openssl, I consistently (thousands 
of times in day) get the warning: 

[warn] (61)Connection refused: connect to listener.

Everything seems to work fine.

I'm now running 2 copies of apache, one on port 80 and one on 443. When I run it like 
this, I get no warnings. It's only when I run both secure and insecure on the same 
server that I get warnings.  Does that make any sense? It seems like openssl with my 
insecure pages are causing the warning, but I seem to get these even when no activity 
is going on.

Here's my version info:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/apache2/bin]# ./httpd -V
Server version: Apache/2.0.48
Server built:   Oct 30 2003 23:42:59
Server's Module Magic Number: 20020903:4
Architecture:   32-bit
Server compiled with
 -D APACHE_MPM_DIR=server/mpm/prefork
 -D APR_HAS_SENDFILE
 -D APR_HAS_MMAP
 -D APR_HAVE_IPV6 (IPv4-mapped addresses enabled)
 -D APR_USE_FLOCK_SERIALIZE
 -D SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT
 -D APR_HAS_OTHER_CHILD
 -D AP_HAVE_RELIABLE_PIPED_LOGS
 -D HTTPD_ROOT=/usr/local/apache2
 -D SUEXEC_BIN=/usr/local/apache2/bin/suexec
 -D DEFAULT_PIDLOG=logs/httpd.pid
 -D DEFAULT_SCOREBOARD=logs/apache_runtime_status
 -D DEFAULT_LOCKFILE=logs/accept.lock
 -D DEFAULT_ERRORLOG=logs/error_log
 -D AP_TYPES_CONFIG_FILE=conf/mime.types
 -D SERVER_CONFIG_FILE=conf/httpd.conf

SSLSessionCache dbm:logs/ssl_scache
SSLMutex file:logs/ssl_mutex

Oh well, I'm probably switching off of FreeBSD soon anyway. So I guess the problems 
will dissappear then.

Alex Hart
President and Head Honcho
ATP Solutions, Inc.
http://www.althepal.com
ATPmail - Your Webmail Solution

The following message was sent by Mads Toftum [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 3 Oct 2003 
10:49:13 +0200.

 On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:58:35PM -0400, Alex Hart wrote:
  More Info:
  
  SSLSessionCache dbm:logs/ssl_scache
 
 Ususally I'd suggest using an shm based cache for performance reasons,
 but that probably isn't the cause.
 
  SSLMutex  file:logs/ssl_mutex
  
 I seem to recall some sort of trouble with mutexes on bsd that has been
 fixed recently - although your error message doesn't seem directly 
 related, it might be worth looking into. Or possibly even going for the
 latest cvs version in APACHE_2_0_BRANCH (a new release should be right
 around the corner anyway).
 
  I will try out different values for these, but I reinstalled without 
 modssl, so I have to install modssl first. Seems like these are pretty 
 standard settings. I'm surprised no one else has run across this warning.
  
 I have heard one reporting similar problems on irc, but that's it.
 
 vh
 
 Mads Toftum
 -- 
 Speaking at ApacheCon 2003 - http://ApacheCon.com/
 T03, Apache 2 mod_ssl tutorial (3h)
 WE03, Troubleshooting Apache configurations 
 WE11, Apache mod_rewrite, the Swiss Army Knife of URL manipulation 
 __
 Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
 User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: apache 1.3.29?

2003-10-31 Thread Boyle Owen
Just to ask the question... Is a mod_ssl_2.8.16-1.3.29 forseen?

Rgds,
Owen Boyle
Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. 

-Original Message-
From: Zvi Har'El [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2003 09:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: apache 1.3.29?


Hi Ralf,

If you don't mind, please include a fix which allows the HTTPS 
env variable
to be passed by suexec

--- apache_1.3.28/src/support/suexec.c.~20030719062731~ Sat 
Jul 19 09:27:31
2003
+++ apache_1.3.28/src/support/suexec.c  Tue Aug 26 16:49:20 2003
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@
 /* variable name starts with */
 HTTP_,
 #ifdef MOD_SSL
-HTTPS_,
+HTTPS=,
 SSL_,
 #endif

This is already included in apache 2

Thanks,

Zvi.


On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:06:52 +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote 
about Re: apache 1.3.29?:
 
 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
  Andreas Gietl wrote:
  
  On Wednesday 29 October 2003 15:39, Jim Jagielski wrote:
  
  i guess there will be a new patch within the next days/hours?
  
  I would guess, but that's not my area :)
 
 Yes, there will be a mod_ssl 2.8.16 released today or tomorrow. I've
 already upgraded mod_ssl to Apache 1.3.29, but I've still to include
 some other fixes. But 2.8.15 works fine with Apache 1.3.29, 
so no need
 to hurry here...
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
 
 
__
 Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   
www.modssl.org
 User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Dr. Zvi Har'El mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Department of
Mathematics
tel:+972-54-227607 icq:179294841 Technion - Israel Institute of
Technology
fax:+972-4-8293388 http://www.math.technion.ac.il/~rl/ Haifa 32000,
ISRAEL
If you can't say somethin' nice, don't say nothin' at all. -- Thumper
(1942)
Thursday, 4 Heshvan 5764, 30 October 2003,
10:49AM
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently
and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your
system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message.
You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print,
or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.
The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail
communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this
message are those of the individual sender, except where the message
states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the
views of the sender's company. 


__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: apache 1.3.29?

2003-10-31 Thread Andreas Gietl
On Friday 31 October 2003 13:03, Boyle Owen wrote:

Mr Engelschall said yesterday on this list:

Yes, there will be a mod_ssl 2.8.16 released today or tomorrow. I've
already upgraded mod_ssl to Apache 1.3.29, but I've still to include
some other fixes. But 2.8.15 works fine with Apache 1.3.29, so no need
to hurry here...
   Ralf S. Engelschall
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   www.engelschall.com


 Just to ask the question... Is a mod_ssl_2.8.16-1.3.29 forseen?

 Rgds,
 Owen Boyle
 Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored.

 -Original Message-

 From: Zvi Har'El [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Sent: Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2003 09:54
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: apache 1.3.29?
 
 
 Hi Ralf,
 
 If you don't mind, please include a fix which allows the HTTPS
 env variable
 to be passed by suexec
 
 --- apache_1.3.28/src/support/suexec.c.~20030719062731~ Sat
 Jul 19 09:27:31
 2003
 +++ apache_1.3.28/src/support/suexec.c  Tue Aug 26 16:49:20 2003
 @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@
  /* variable name starts with */
  HTTP_,
  #ifdef MOD_SSL
 -HTTPS_,
 +HTTPS=,
  SSL_,
  #endif
 
 This is already included in apache 2
 
 Thanks,
 
 Zvi.
 
 
 On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:06:52 +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote
 
 about Re: apache 1.3.29?:
  In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
   Andreas Gietl wrote:
   On Wednesday 29 October 2003 15:39, Jim Jagielski wrote:
  
   i guess there will be a new patch within the next days/hours?
  
   I would guess, but that's not my area :)
 
  Yes, there will be a mod_ssl 2.8.16 released today or tomorrow. I've
  already upgraded mod_ssl to Apache 1.3.29, but I've still to include
  some other fixes. But 2.8.15 works fine with Apache 1.3.29,
 
 so no need
 
  to hurry here...
 Ralf S. Engelschall
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.engelschall.com
 
 __
 
  Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)

 www.modssl.org

  User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
e-admin internet gmbh
Andreas Gietltel +49 941 3810884
Ludwig-Thoma-Strasse 35  fax +49 (0)1805/39160 - 29104
93051 Regensburg  mobil +49 171 6070008

PGP/GPG-Key unter http://www.e-admin.de/gpg.html




__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: apache 1.3.29?

2003-10-31 Thread Boyle Owen
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Gietl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mr Engelschall said yesterday on this list:

Arggg... I must've missed this... And I was especially looking out for
it!
my bad...
 
Rgds,
Owen Boyle
Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. 


Yes, there will be a mod_ssl 2.8.16 released today or tomorrow. I've
already upgraded mod_ssl to Apache 1.3.29, but I've still to include
some other fixes. But 2.8.15 works fine with Apache 1.3.29, so no need
to hurry here...
   Ralf S. Engelschall
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   www.engelschall.com


 Just to ask the question... Is a mod_ssl_2.8.16-1.3.29 forseen?

 Rgds,
 Owen Boyle
 Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored.

 -Original Message-

 From: Zvi Har'El [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Sent: Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2003 09:54
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: apache 1.3.29?
 
 
 Hi Ralf,
 
 If you don't mind, please include a fix which allows the HTTPS
 env variable
 to be passed by suexec
 
 --- apache_1.3.28/src/support/suexec.c.~20030719062731~ Sat
 Jul 19 09:27:31
 2003
 +++ apache_1.3.28/src/support/suexec.c  Tue Aug 26 16:49:20 2003
 @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@
  /* variable name starts with */
  HTTP_,
  #ifdef MOD_SSL
 -HTTPS_,
 +HTTPS=,
  SSL_,
  #endif
 
 This is already included in apache 2
 
 Thanks,
 
 Zvi.
 
 
 On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:06:52 +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote
 
 about Re: apache 1.3.29?:
  In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
you wrote:
   Andreas Gietl wrote:
   On Wednesday 29 October 2003 15:39, Jim Jagielski wrote:
  
   i guess there will be a new patch within the next days/hours?
  
   I would guess, but that's not my area :)
 
  Yes, there will be a mod_ssl 2.8.16 released today or 
tomorrow. I've
  already upgraded mod_ssl to Apache 1.3.29, but I've still 
to include
  some other fixes. But 2.8.15 works fine with Apache 1.3.29,
 
 so no need
 
  to hurry here...
 Ralf S. Engelschall
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.engelschall.com
 
 
__
 
  Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)

 www.modssl.org

  User Support Mailing List  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Automated List Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
e-admin internet gmbh
Andreas Gietltel 
+49 941 3810884
Ludwig-Thoma-Strasse 35  fax +49 
(0)1805/39160 - 29104
93051 Regensburg  mobil +49 171 6070008

PGP/GPG-Key unter http://www.e-admin.de/gpg.html






This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently
and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your
system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message.
You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print,
or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.
The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail
communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this
message are those of the individual sender, except where the message
states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the
views of the sender's company. 


__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]