Re: Apache 2.039

2002-08-09 Thread Cliff Woolley

On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:

 Upgrade to 0.9.6e.

Make that 0.9.6f, released today.  :)

--Cliff

__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Apache 2.039

2002-08-09 Thread Cliff Woolley

On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:

 Make that 0.9.6f, released today.  :)

That's what I get for not reading all of my email before responding to
any of it.  0.9.6g was also released today.  Sigh.  :)

__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Apache 2.039

2002-08-09 Thread Maurizio Marini

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 09 August 2002 04:27 pm, Cliff Woolley wrote:
 On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
  Upgrade to 0.9.6e.
 
 Make that 0.9.6f, released today.  :)
 
 g, just a few minutes ago..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9U9M/4Q/49nIJTlwRAgh9AJ9RVLUm+8WXtqAkgDNTij/fJnTvdQCfVRko
S0+auy1Me02md2SuHyvmDA4=
=gl4i
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Apache 2.039

2002-08-09 Thread Xiao, Wei
Title: RE: Apache 2.039





Followed your instruction, finally got every configuration done. But server won't start with following message in error_log,

[Fri Aug 09 11:49:29 2002] [warn] Init: PRNG still contains not sufficient entropy!
[Fri Aug 09 11:49:32 2002] [error] Init: Failed to generate temporary 512 bit RSA private key Configuration Failed


Thanks.


-Original Message-
From: Daniel Lopez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 2:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Apache 2.039




Have a look at http://www.apacheworld.org/ty24/site.chapter17.html
That is a chapter I have online that explains step by step how to build
Apache 2 with SSL support. 


 When I run configure --with-ssl=$directory_of_open_ssl, it complained that
 it can't find ssl toolkit library. Did I do anything wrong?
 
 Thanks.
 
 Wei
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 1:50 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Apache 2.039
 
 
 On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Tony Jarriault wrote:
 
  I'm search openssl for Apache 2.039, where can i find it, please ?
 
 I assume you mean mod_ssl, not openssl. mod_ssl is bundled with Apache
 2.0.x -- check your copy of Apache 2.0 and you'll find that it's already
 there (caveat: we do not distribute binaries of mod_ssl, only source
 code).
 
 OpenSSL is the same regardless of what mod_ssl you use and is available at
 www.openssl.org.
 
 --Cliff
 
 PS: Can we PLEASE add this to the FAQ or even the main modssl.org site?
 
 __
 Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
 User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: Apache 2.039

2002-08-09 Thread Cliff Woolley

On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:

 That's what I get for not reading all of my email before responding to
 any of it.  0.9.6g was also released today.  Sigh.  :)

I guess today was the day for releases.  Apache 2.0.40 is now out as well.

--Cliff

__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Apache 2.039

2002-08-09 Thread R. DuFresne

On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:

 On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
 
  That's what I get for not reading all of my email before responding to
  any of it.  0.9.6g was also released today.  Sigh.  :)
 
 I guess today was the day for releases.  Apache 2.0.40 is now out as well.

Any word on if this compiles on those older linux kernels as the previous
release was a total dud in that realm?

Thanks,

Ron DuFresne
-- 
~~
admin  senior security consultant:  sysinfo.com
http://sysinfo.com

Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity.  It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation.
-- Johnny Hart

testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!

__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Apache 2.039

2002-08-09 Thread R. DuFresne


This is a security fix release for those using apache in Cygwin
environments!

quote

Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 22:07:52 +0100 (BST)
From: Mark J Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 Full Disclosure [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 Vuln-Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Apache 2.0 vulnerability affects non-Unix
platforms

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

For Immediate Disclosure

=== SUMMARY 

Title: Apache 2.0 vulnerability affects non-Unix platforms
 Date: 9th August 2002
 Revision: 2
 Product Name: Apache HTTP server 2.0
  OS/Platform: Windows, OS2, Netware
Permanent URL:
http://httpd.apache.org/info/security_bulletin_20020809a.txt
  Vendor Name: Apache Software Foundation
   Vendor URL: http://httpd.apache.org/
  Affects: All Released versions of 2.0 through 2.0.39
 Fixed in: 2.0.40
  Identifiers: CAN-2002-0661

=== DESCRIPTION 
Apache is a powerful, full-featured, efficient, and freely-available Web
server.  On the 7th August 2002, The Apache Software Foundation was
notified of the discovery of a significant vulnerability, identified by
Auriemma Luigi [EMAIL PROTECTED].

This vulnerability has the potential to allow an attacker to inflict
serious damage to a server, and reveal sensitive data.  This vulnerability
affects default installations of the Apache web server.

Unix and other variant platforms appear unaffected.  Cygwin users are
likely to be affected.

=== SOLUTION 

A simple one line workaround in the httpd.conf file will close the
vulnerability.  Prior to the first 'Alias' or 'Redirect' directive, add
the following directive to the global server configuration:

   RedirectMatch 400 \\\.\.

Fixes for this vulnerability are also included in Apache HTTP server
version 2.0.40.  The 2.0.40 release also contains fixes for two minor
path-revealing exposures.  This release of Apache is available at
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/

/quote and SNIP

Thanks,

Ron DuFresne

On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:

 On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
 
  That's what I get for not reading all of my email before responding to
  any of it.  0.9.6g was also released today.  Sigh.  :)
 
 I guess today was the day for releases.  Apache 2.0.40 is now out as well.
 
 --Cliff
 
 __
 Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
 User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-- 
~~
admin  senior security consultant:  sysinfo.com
http://sysinfo.com

Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity.  It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation.
-- Johnny Hart

testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!

__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Apache 2.039

2002-08-09 Thread Cliff Woolley

On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, R. DuFresne wrote:

 Any word on if this compiles on those older linux kernels as the previous
 release was a total dud in that realm?

Probably no change.  But FWIW, I believe one of our developers tried it on
an older kernel and it worked fine for him... if you could provide
access to a box it fails on to one of the core dev team, that might help.

--Cliff

__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Apache 2.039

2002-08-08 Thread EdwardSPL



Gregg Andrew wrote:


Openssl.org
version 0.9.6e



Do you know what different between 0.9.6b and 0.9.6e, Because I
knew there are some of users they are using 0.9.6b, I think 0.9.6b is an
older version... But if I use the new version of Apache ( eg : 1.3.26 ),
so... use 0.9.6e is good ? I was fail to install 0.9.6d !




Re: Apache 2.039

2002-08-08 Thread Cliff Woolley

On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Do you know what different between 0.9.6b and 0.9.6e

Among other things, there are important security fixes in 0.9.6e (for
remotely exploitable bugs in 0.9.6d and earlier versions).

Upgrade to 0.9.6e.

--Cliff

__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Apache 2.039

2002-08-08 Thread EdwardSPL

Cliff Woolley wrote:

 On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Do you know what different between 0.9.6b and 0.9.6e

 Among other things, there are important security fixes in 0.9.6e (for
 remotely exploitable bugs in 0.9.6d and earlier versions).

 Upgrade to 0.9.6e.

So, do you agree compile and install apache 1.3.26, php 4.2.2, MySQL
3.23.51, OpenSSL 0.9.6e and mod_ssl 2.8.10-1.3.26 good for working
together under Linux / Unix / other OS System ?

Thank for your help !


__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]