[MORPHMET] Re: Morphometrics in Solanaceas
Hi Christian, I just released a step-by-step guide for geometric morphometrics of flowers. This could be of interest. SAVRIAMA, Y. (2018). A Step-by-Step Guide For Geometric Morphometrics Of Floral Symmetry. *Frontiers in Plant Science*, *9*, 1433. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01433 Best wishes, Yoland On Thursday, October 25, 2018 at 6:21:09 PM UTC+3, Christian Borja Tacuri wrote: > > Hi everyone. > > I'm here looking for some help. I've been assigned to create a small > project where I have to compare morphometric characteristics among the > flowers of 10 species of Solanaceas in my country, Ecuador. So, I'd like > some help because I need to locate the landmarks and semilandmarks and I'm > not sure in which parts of the flower I should put the marks for the > comparison. Also, I need to look for differences between the flowers, based > on the abiotic factors of the places the plants live in. > > I'll be so thankful for any guide that you can provide me. > -- MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MORPHMET" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to morphmet+unsubscr...@morphometrics.org.
[MORPHMET] Morphometrics in Solanaceas
Hi everyone. I'm here looking for some help. I've been assigned to create a small project where I have to compare morphometric characteristics among the flowers of 10 species of Solanaceas in my country, Ecuador. So, I'd like some help because I need to locate the landmarks and semilandmarks and I'm not sure in which parts of the flower I should put the marks for the comparison. Also, I need to look for differences between the flowers, based on the abiotic factors of the places the plants live in. I'll be so thankful for any guide that you can provide me. -- MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MORPHMET" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to morphmet+unsubscr...@morphometrics.org.
[MORPHMET] Procrustes ANOVA
Dear All I preparing a geometric morphometric work on an isopod species in Egypt. In morphoJ, the Procrustes ANOVA results give 0 values with one of the parameters (i.e. sex). The article deals with shape changes in two populations. in the analysis, the population is the main effect (Extra 1), sex (Extra 2) and individuals is the random effect. I get the SS and MS for sex 0. So, what is the problem? I need help in this point. the results are: Classifiers used for the Procrustes ANOVA: Extra main effect(s): -- Extra 1: Population -- Extra 2: Sex Individuals: Individuals Error 1: Image Centroid size: Effect SS MS dfF P (param.) Extra 11795651.412017 359130.282403 5 7.46 <.0001 Extra 2 0.000.00 2 0.00 1. Individual 9726394.53609948150.468000 2023709.53 <.0001 Error 1 2699.886705 12.980225 208 0.25 0.9812 Residual 105.123498 52.561749 2 Shape, Procrustes ANOVA: Effect SSMS df F P (param.) Pillai tr. P (param.) Extra 10.24092157 0.0005125991 470 5.94 <.00013.27 <.0001 Extra 20. 0.00 188 0.00 1.0.00 1. Individual 1.63916376 0.863263 18988 25.13 <.0001 67.18 <.0001 Error 10.06715515 0.034347 19552 0.53 1. Residual 0.00121531 0.064644 188 Thanks in advance Tarek G. Ismail t_gad_2...@sohag.edu.eg -- MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MORPHMET" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to morphmet+unsubscr...@morphometrics.org.
