Re: [Mpls] Strib take: Insiders don't make chief cut

2003-12-19 Thread Peter T Schmitz
While I believe I've been the Mayor's fiercest critic on this list and
will continue to be so,  I back him on his choice for Police Chief.

Given the problems of brutality and racism among the rank and file of our
police force it's imperative that we hire and outsider.  Besides, didn't
Lucy Gerold play a significant part in the Hard Times Cafe fiasco?  

Hiring a woman just for the sake of hiring a woman is sexist and
counterproductive. And if Lisa Goodman is as concerned about the Mayor's
affirmative action record as she claims to be, then she ought to show
some integrity for once and ask to have her name taken off R.T.'s
campaign fundraising literature.

The Mayor took a lot of flak from the black community, and rightly so,
for his failure to effectively address how blacks in Minneapolis are
mistreated and underserved by our police.  Now he's trying to do
something about it.  I think we need to give him a break on this one.

Finally, as long as council members like Goodman, Barb Johnson, Gary
Schiff, Dan Nizoliek, Scott Benson and Sandy Colvin Roy continue their
show of indifference to blacks and other groups that have been hurt by
Minneapolis law enforcement personnel, they will have much to answer for
if anther race riot breaks out during their term.Peter
Schmitz   CARAG


REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re:[Mpls] In defense of the skunk

2003-12-19 Thread Fredric Markus
I once met a skunk when I was walking back to home base after a harvesting
session in the county woodlot. I had Swede saws, no noisy machines. Mr.
Skunk and I were both on the township road - he crossing it and I traveling
along it. I stopped and gave this rather grand-looking creature time to
check me out. He was apparently satisfied that I was no threat to his domain
and continued on his way with great dignity. To give this a local spin, my
live and let live attitude also worked well with the woodchucks, beavers,
and muskrats that were my quondam neighbors on Nicollet Island.

Fred Markus, West Phillips, where I've seen nary a skunk.

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.553 / Virus Database: 345 - Release Date: 12/18/2003
 

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Back room deals at the Park Board

2003-12-19 Thread Svattheriver
From the Park Board Charter, Charter Sec.1 p.2-3: also Chapter 16 of the Minneapolis City Charter:
"A majority of the members of said Board shall constitute a quorum; but no action of said Board, designating or purchasing or leasing lands, creating a bonded debt, or filling vacancies in the Park and Recreation Board, shall be valid unless voted for by six (6) members of said Board;"

Thanks, Scott Vreeland Seward


[Mpls] Fishing Gear

2003-12-19 Thread Steve Brandt
Annie, et al: 

Tackle Plus was on the north side of Lake Street, just east of 35W.  I
assume it's still there.  South Side Farm Store at Bloomngton and 38th
has worms.  They're sold for composting but I assume one can also use
redworms for fishing.

Steve Brandt
Kingfield
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Re: Who made you Kings Queens?

2003-12-19 Thread loki anderson
 As much as I'm normally amused by Mr. Reitman's
anti-DFL rants, I did want to add some facts that he
failed to mention. Of the four dissenting votes on the
appointment of an interim Parks Superintendant, three
of them, John Ervin, Rochelle Berry-Graves and Vivian
Mason were DFL endorsed.
 And of the five votes in favor of the
appointment, one of them, Bob Fine, was elected by
defeating a DFL endorsee and another, Carol Kummer,
was appointed to her seat by the Park Board following
the death of Ed Solomon, although she is a DFL party
member.
 I would be sincerely suprised if anyone on the
Minneapolis DFL Central Committee would be supportive
of these closed door shenanigans.

Loki Anderson
Marshall Terrace

=
As through this life you travel
You'll meet some funny men.
Some'll rob you with a six-gun,
And some with a fountain pen.
 -Woody Guthrie

__
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Interesting

2003-12-19 Thread Dennis Plante
As you all probably know by now, a group of Jordan residents protested 
outside of Gregge Johnson's house in Elk River the week before Thanksgiving. 
 He's an absentee rental property owner that we feel has caused a fair 
amount of problems in our neighborhood over the last several years.  
Probably the most important achievement (of his) to date, is that he owns 
the house that started the Jordan Melee.

He has subsequently sent my wife and I (among others) mail, thanking us for 
all the free advertising he received from our endeavors, along with 
religious/right-wing cartoons suggesting the real duty of citizens.

His defense?  We're being discrimminatory, we should start protesting 
against the minority landlords that rent to level III sex offenders (in our 
neighborhood) as well.

BTW-I noticed two properties for sale on his block.

Dennis Plante
Jordan
_
Tired of slow downloads? Compare online deals from your local high-speed 
providers now.  https://broadband.msn.com

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Re: Mpls Police Chief/Park Board

2003-12-19 Thread John M O'Neal
Police Chief
From: David Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:03:54
-0600 Subject: [Mpls] Rybak narrows field to 2 out-of-towners
 So much for my speculationand R.T. kowtowing to the Federation's
desire for an insider: he's narrowed the field to Charles Moose (DC
Sniper case veteran) and William McManus, two-year Dayton chief. - - - -
- - -

Comment:
 About a week ago, I was talking to some relatives who live near
Dayton about police chiefs. They mentioned that they heard that the
Dayton Police Federation strongly supported Chief McManus moving to
Minneapolis. They suspect that the Federation might have preferred
Anchorage, Alaska or Portland, Maine, but Minneapolis probably will be
far enough.

John O'Neal
Holland

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Vreeland - Seward) Date: Fri, 19 Dec
2003 05:25:28 EST Subject: [Mpls] Back room deals at the Park Board
 From the Park Board Charter, Charter Sec.1 p.2-3:  also Chapter 16
of the Minneapolis City Charter: A majority of the members of said Board
shall constitute a quorum; but no action of said Board, designating or
purchasing or leasing lands, creating a bonded debt, or filling vacancies
in the Park and Recreation Board, shall be valid unless voted for by six
(6) members of said Board;

Comment:
 Reguardless of how much you deal and plan and organize, there is
always that person in the back of the room who has read the rules.

Thanks.
John O'Neal
Holland
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Strib take: Insiders don't make chief cut

2003-12-19 Thread Michelle Martin
I find it problematic that certain council members appear to be threatening
to block Mayor Rybak's chief apointment because their favorite candidate, or
issue, is not being forwarded through the final two choices.  It is not the
council's role to select the chief.  They should provide oversight to the
decision to assure somebody who would be a bad choice doesn't get hired
(ie-somebody with a record of ignoring legitimate claims of police brutality
or somebody who clearly doesn't have the experience to run a department).

From everything I have read and heard, the final two candidates are both
well qualified to serve as chief.  In fact, the council members threatening
no votes haven't given any reasons that relate to the two candidates
themselves, but rather because the finalists don't fit their particular
interest (ie-women in leadership positions or hiring from within).  I hope
these council members will reconsider their opposition.  The city needs to
bring the new chief into position with a strong signal of support and vote
of confidence to the community.

Michelle Martin
Armatage


REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Protesting landlords

2003-12-19 Thread Leurquin, Ronald
Dennis
Maybe this could be the start of something.
Slowly having neighborhood groups protest in front of all the various less than 
adequate absentee landlords around the metro.  Even in front of a management company 
office if owned by out of the area persons or corporations.
Call the media ahead of time and make an event out of it.  That would take the wind 
out of Mr. Johnson's accusation of discrimination.

Those landlords get to hide out in their cushy suburban neighborhoods away from the 
problems they are fostering, and I bet most of their neighbors don't even know it.

I'm liking this idea enough to ask to join in even though I don't live in Jordan.

Ron Leurquin
Nokomis East

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Dennis Plante
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 9:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Mpls] Interesting


As you all probably know by now, a group of Jordan residents protested 
outside of Gregge Johnson's house in Elk River the week before Thanksgiving. 
  He's an absentee rental property owner that we feel has caused a fair 
amount of problems in our neighborhood over the last several years.  
Probably the most important achievement (of his) to date, is that he owns 
the house that started the Jordan Melee.

He has subsequently sent my wife and I (among others) mail, thanking us for 
all the free advertising he received from our endeavors, along with 
religious/right-wing cartoons suggesting the real duty of citizens.

His defense?  We're being discrimminatory, we should start protesting 
against the minority landlords that rent to level III sex offenders (in our 
neighborhood) as well.

BTW-I noticed two properties for sale on his block.

Dennis Plante
Jordan

_
Tired of slow downloads? Compare online deals from your local high-speed 
providers now.  https://broadband.msn.com

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Re: MPD: Mpls Mayor wants to micro-manage police dept

2003-12-19 Thread Andy Driscoll
The police department of any city is in desperate need of oversight from
elected officials. It's the mayor's job to ride herd on the cops. The
inclination for all chiefs is to protect the blue code even as the
federations take potshots at him/her. It's disingenuous to suggest that
police chiefs be given free rein to manage without oversight. Oversight is
not micromanagement. The record is so replete with abuse that the only
accountable people in government are elected officials. Minneapolis cops are
among the most abusive in the country. They must be corralled and set
straight. A badge is not a license for assaulting civilians.

Andy Driscoll
Saint Paul
 
 From: Ed Fesler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 07:32:07 -0800 (PST)
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: MPD: Mpls Mayor wants to micro-manage police dept; 1 million spent
 restoring glass ceiling at City Hall
 
  I hope the Minneapolis City Council rejects Mayor
 R.T. Rybak's attempt to run the police department out
 of the Mayor's office. I thought we were electing a
 Mayor two years ago-not a police chief.
 
  I approve of most of what Rybak has done as Mayor,
 but I don't like what he's trying to do to the police
 department. 
 
  Here is a Star Tribune story on the police chief
 selection:
 
  http://startribune.com/stories/462/4276680.html
  
  The hand-picked advisory committee had six
 candidates to choose from-two Minneapolis Deputy
 Chiefs and four outside applicants.
  
  Two women have risen through the police ranks to
 the rank of Deputy Chief-Sharon Lubinski and Lucy
 Gerold. They were the two internal applicants for the
 position of Police Chief.
 
  Of the six candidates, three were African American
 men and the two Deputy Chiefs were white women. There
 is one white man on the list-the Chief from Dayton,
 Ohio.
 
  According to WCCO, the candidate Rybak really wants
 is the white guy.
 
  Maybe the real unspoken question the committee
 asked was are you willing to be the Mayor's boy?
 
  No African-American man will permit such a thing.
 Lubinski and Gerold have never been boys.
 
  The Minneapolis Police Federation is a labor union
 that does a very good job representing the views and
 attitudes of rank-and-file cops. Many liberals and
 critics of the police don't like the Police
 Federation.
 
  The Police Federation would rather have a woman as
 Police Chief than another outsider. Most of the Police
 Chiefs over the last twenty years have been outsiders
 with an adversarial attitude toward the rest of the
 department.
  
  What is the evidence that Mayor Rybak wants to
 micro-manage the Police Department?
 
  First, Rybak tried to force Chief Olson out. Then
 Rybak tried to muzzle the police department and
 rank-and-file cops by centralizing communications in
 City Hall. All communications with the media were
 supposed to go through the City Hall office.
 
  If the police department is going to be run by
 politicians instead of run by cops maybe we should
 change the city charter to make the police chief an
 elected position.
 
  An even better solution might be to elect a new
 mayor. How about Sharon Lubinski or Lucy Gerold for
 mayor?
 
  The City Council should hold its ground and insist
 on one of the Deputy Chiefs. R.T. Rybak needs to stop
 trying to run the police department himself.
 
  Is there really a glass ceiling at City Hall?
 
  Yes-and they spent a million dollars to restore it!
 
  Here is the Pioneer Press story on the restoration
 of the stained glass windows in the City Hall rotunda:
 
 http://www.twincities.com/mld/pioneerpress/7525841.htm
 
 
   Ed Fesler[EMAIL PROTECTED] Minneapolis
 
 
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
 http://photos.yahoo.com/
 
 MN-POLITICS-DISCUSS http://www.e-democracy.org/mn-politics/ is a CIVIL
 discussion of Minnesota public issues and politics.
 ---
 
 
  Don't like E-Democracy's rules? You have alternatives:
 http://www.e-democracy.org/mninteract 
 
 
 Messages (text-only, no attachments) are to be signed with your full real
 name, city and e-mail address.  No member may post more than twice a day.
 
 Moderator/Discussion Rules Manager:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -
 To unsubscribe to MN-Politics-Discuss send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To receive daily digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For the list to retain its value, and to show respect for your fellow list
 members, please keep a Minnesota focus on your posts.  Thanks.
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mn-politics-discuss/
 
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 
 

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't 

[Mpls] Re: Who made you Kings Queens?/It's Alive!

2003-12-19 Thread PennBroKeith
In a message dated 12/19/03 7:29:18 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 As much as I'm normally amused by Mr. Reitman's
 anti-DFL rants, I did want to add some facts that he
 failed to mention. Of the four dissenting votes on the
 appointment of an interim Parks Superintendent, three
 of them, John Ervin, Rochelle Berry-Graves and Vivian
 Mason were DFL endorsed.
  And of the five votes in favor of the
 appointment, one of them, Bob Fine, was elected by
 defeating a DFL endorsee and another, Carol Kummer,
 was appointed to her seat by the Park Board following
 the death of Ed Solomon, although she is a DFL party
 member.
  I would be sincerely surprised if anyone on the
 Minneapolis DFL Central Committee would be supportive
 of these closed door shenanigans.
 
 Loki Anderson
 Marshall Terrace
  
Keith says; Perhaps I allow instinct to run ahead of research; I am human, 
not a machine. I do not think the numbers presented above refute my comments. 
The degree of Machine taint, or influence, may not be revealed in acknowledged 
details mentioned by Mr. Anderson. My main point is: A political machine 
transcends the individual sum of it's parts. It adapts and evolves (like flu 
virus?). It survives, hence it should be observed.

And the term Central Committee gives me a healthy shiver, anytime.

Keith Reitman Ain't affiliated with no Central Committee   NearNorth
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Park Board - Actionable Open Meeting violation?

2003-12-19 Thread ABerget
IF - big "if" - it can be proved that a majority of the Park Board met outside of a properly noticed meeting for the purpose of making this decision, it may be an actionable violation of the open meeting law on the part of each of them. Where personnel matters are concerned it's often murky, but this seems suspicious. 

Lawyers on the list - please comment.

Ann Berget
Kingfield


[Mpls] MPLS Park Board Superintendent

2003-12-19 Thread Marie Hauser
I want to publicly state how pleased I am that John Gurban has agreed to become
the Superintendent of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation System.  Mr. Gurban is
an extremely qualified applicant.  He actually lives in Minneapolis, unlike many
of the candidates.


 John Gurban is currently Executive Director of the Minnesota Parks and
Recreation Association, the state professional association.  Mr. Gurban is
familiar
with MPLS park staff and the park system. He has extensive experience with the
planning and implementation of parks, recreation and environmental initiatives.
Our current Superintendent, Mary Merrill Anderson, and other park professionals
are unanimous in their regard for Mr. Gurban's qualifications.

Mr. Gurban's previous experience includes:

- managing a recycling and environmental service

- directing parks and recreation systems in Apple Valley, MN, British
   Columbia and Colorado

- creating a master plan for the Greater Victoria [Canada] park system

- program manager for the Olympic Committee of Manitoba

 -strong background in environment, recreation, planning and management.



For months the Park Board has been following a process we had established. In
November we received a list of 7 top candidates from our search firm. Two weeks
ago we spent several days interviewing these 7 and were especially pleased with
the quality
of 2 of the applicants. I was really disappointed when the two most qualified
candidates withdrew last week.

Unfortunately, the process left only less qualified candidates in the race.  The
withdrawal of the candidates may have been caused by several of the Park
Commissioners themselves (http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/4269752.html).
The process unfortunately became flawed.  Action was needed to produce the best
candidate for the position.



It is vital to have strong, knowledgeable, capable leadership in these difficult
times. We need a leader and I believe we have found one.  I urge the community
and all Park Board Commissioners and Mr. Gurban to keep our Park system strong.
Minneapolis does not need the embarrassment of another great candidate
withdrawing due to internal differences.



Marie Hauser, Commissioner, 3rd Park District



REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Mayor wants to micro-manage police dept; $1 million spent restoring glass ceiling at City Hall

2003-12-19 Thread Ed Fesler
   I hope the Minneapolis City Council rejects Mayor
R.T. Rybak's attempt to run the police department out
of the Mayor's office. I thought we were electing a
Mayor two years ago-not a police chief.
  
   I approve of most of what Rybak has done as Mayor,
but I don't like what he's trying to do to the police
department. 
 
   Here is a Star Tribune story on the police chief
selection:

   http://startribune.com/stories/462/4276680.html
   
   The hand-picked advisory committee had six
candidates to choose from-two Minneapolis Deputy
Chiefs and four outside applicants. 
   
   Two women have risen through the police ranks to
the rank of Deputy Chief-Sharon Lubinski and Lucy
Gerold. They were the two internal applicants for the
position of Police Chief.

   Of the six candidates, three were African American
men and the two Deputy Chiefs were white women. There
is one white man on the list-the Chief from Dayton,
Ohio.

   According to WCCO, the candidate Rybak really wants
is the white guy. 

   Maybe the real unspoken question the committee
asked was are you willing to be the Mayor's boy?

   No African-American man will permit such a thing.
Lubinski and Gerold have never been boys.

   The Minneapolis Police Federation is a labor union
that does a very good job representing the views and
attitudes of rank-and-file cops. Many liberals and
critics of the police don't like the Police
Federation.

   The Police Federation would rather have a woman as
Police Chief than another outsider. Most of the Police
Chiefs over the last twenty years have been outsiders
with an adversarial attitude toward the rest of the
department.
   
   What is the evidence that Mayor Rybak wants to
micro-manage the Police Department?

   First, Rybak tried to force Chief Olson out. Then
Rybak tried to muzzle the police department and
rank-and-file cops by centralizing communications in
City Hall. All communications with the media were
supposed to go through the City Hall office.

   If the police department is going to be run by
politicians instead of run by cops maybe we should
change the city charter to make the police chief an
elected position. 

   An even better solution might be to elect a new
mayor. How about Sharon Lubinski or Lucy Gerold for
mayor?

   The City Council should hold its ground and insist
on one of the Deputy Chiefs. R.T. Rybak needs to stop
trying to run the police department himself.

  (HUMOR)

   Is there really a glass ceiling at City Hall?

   Yes-and they spent a million dollars to restore it!

   Here is the Pioneer Press story on the restoration
of the stained glass windows in the City Hall rotunda:

http://www.twincities.com/mld/pioneerpress/7525841.htm


Ed Fesler[EMAIL PROTECTED] Minneapolis

Corcoran


__
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Park Board superintendent

2003-12-19 Thread Melendez, Brian
Keith Reitman wrote, Please try to remember; this goes beyond the Fab 5 who 
did the dirty. A machine runs this town; the DFL Matrix. They will do what they want 
to do; and it may not actually be decided at an open meeting; nor even by those 
voting. Like it or loppett.

Then Loki Anderson wrote, As much as I'm normally amused by Mr. Reitman's 
anti-DFL rants, I did want to add some facts that he
failed to mention. Of the four dissenting votes on the appointment of an interim Parks 
Superintendant, three of them, John Ervin, Rochelle Berry-Graves and Vivian Mason were 
DFL endorsed. And of the five votes in favor of the appointment, one of them, Bob 
Fine, was elected by defeating a DFL endorsee and another, Carol Kummer, was appointed 
to her seat by the Park Board following the death of Ed Solomon, although she is a DFL 
party member. I would be sincerely suprised if anyone on the Minneapolis DFL Central 
Committee would be supportive of these closed door shenanigans.

[BRM] I join Loki's comments. Let me add three more points:

First, just as many DFL-endorsed commissioners voted against the appointment 
(Berry Graves, Erwin, Mason), as voted for it (Dziedzic, Hauser, Olson). 
Three-quarters of the opposition were DFL-endorsed commissioners.

Second, if the DFL-endorsed candidate (Tracy Nordstrom) had been elected as 
the commissioner representing Park District 6, the seat that Board President Bob Fine 
now holds, then the appointment would not have gone through. I don't speak for Tracy, 
and I haven't asked her how she would have voted on this issue; but I worked on her 
campaign, I have known her for years, and I would bet the ranch that not only would 
she have refused to be a party to the backroom maneuvering that evidently went on 
here, she would have spoken out against it. The DFL endorsing convention rejected Bob 
Fine for a reason.

Third, I have been hearing about this issue from quite a few DFL Party 
activists in the past couple days, and not a one supports the process by which the 
Park Board made this appointment. Not a one.


Ann Berget wrote, IF - big 'if' -- it can be proved that a majority of the 
Park Board met outside of a properly noticed meeting for the purpose of making this 
decision,  it may be an actionable violation of the open meeting law on the part of 
each of them. Where personnel matters are concerned it's often murky,  but this seems 
suspicious.

[BRM] I wondered the same thing as this story unfolded. It appears that the 
five commissioners who supported the appointment knew in advance what was going to 
happen, shared information among themselves that was not shared with their colleagues, 
and surprised the other four. Those tactics stink. But they don't violate the open 
meeting law unless the majority was meeting together secretly before the open meeting. 
If the majority commissioners were just talking to each other two or three or even 
four at a time, then they weren't breaking the law, as far as I know.


Marie Hauser wrote, For months the Park Board has been following a process we 
had established. In November we received a list of 7 top candidates from our search 
firm. Two weeks ago we spent several days interviewing these 7 and were especially 
pleased with the quality of 2 of the applicants. I was really disappointed when the 
two most qualified candidates withdrew last week. Unfortunately, the process left only 
less qualified candidates in the race. The withdrawal of the candidates may have been 
caused by several of the Park Commissioners themselves 
(http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/4269752.html). The process unfortunately 
became flawed. Action was needed to produce the best candidate for the position.

[BRM] Fair enough. And I appreciate Marie Hauser stepping forward and 
explaining the majority's thinking. But I am left with several questions. If action 
was needed to produce the best candidate for the position, why was that action 
necessarily an immediate appointment? Why not reopen the search, even if only for a 
brief period? If Bob Fine's high-school classmate is truly the best candidate that can 
be found, then that fact would still be true after a more open process.

Any why the secrecy? Why were some -- most -- commissioners evidently privy to 
material information that was not shared with their colleagues? If it is true that 
the process unfortunately became flawed, why not start over with a process that 
fixes the flaw? How is no process at all better than a flawed process?

BRM

Brian Melendez, Chair,
  Minneapolis DFL Party
Lowry Hill (Ward 7)

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: 

RE: [Mpls] MPLS Park Board Superintendent

2003-12-19 Thread MJ Mueller
Marie Hauser, Commissioner, 3rd Park District wrote:
Minneapolis does not need the embarrassment of another great candidate
withdrawing due to internal differences.
I say: Minneapolis does not need the embarrassment of it's elected officials 
circumventing process and showing utter disrespect for thier fellow board 
members. This is disrespectful to the citizens of Minneapolis as well. Shame 
on you.

MJ Mueller
Seward
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract

_
Enjoy the holiday season with great tips from MSN.  
http://special.msn.com/network/happyholidays.armx

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Strib take: Insiders don't make chief cut

2003-12-19 Thread Terrell Brown
--- Michelle Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I find it problematic that certain council members appear to be
threatening to block Mayor Rybak's chief apointment because their
favorite candidate, or issue, is not being forwarded through the final
two choices.  It is not the council's role to select the chief.  

[TB]  I disagree with the comment about not being the council's role. 
We have a process for selecting a Chief which includes approval by the
city's Executive Committee AND the City Council.  The Mayor is merely
making a nomination or recommendation.

Why go outside when you have a strong, qualified and competent inside
candidate?  Good employers generally promote from within when they have
such a candidate.  What message does it send to city employees when
department heads are hired from the outside?

Promoting a current employee has fewer unknowns.  You have someone you
have been working with for over a decade.  That is better than any
interview process and reference checking than anyone has ever
developed.  It costs a tremendous amount of money to hire and train a
new employee, promotion from within cuts these costs considerably.

Councilmembers have a responsibility to those who elect them to work to
insure that we have the best person we can get in the job.  I don't
want my Councilmember to be the Mayor's rubber stamp.




Terrell Brown
Loring Park

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Party at City Hall

2003-12-19 Thread LEE EKLUND
For those politico listers or architectural buffs who lurk in the bowels of
city hall time to time, should be advised of the party today commencing @ 3
pm today to officially unveil the rotunda restoration. I have been advised a
number of the usual suspects (politicians) will be in attendance, some
possibly to deliver a stem winder to commemorate the occasion. Coffee and
cookies will be provided, but alas, no open bar.

Lee R. Eklund
Victory

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


RE: [Mpls] Strib take: Insiders don't make chief cut

2003-12-19 Thread Michelle Martin
Terrell Brown wrote:
I disagree with the comment about not being the council's role.
We have a process for selecting a Chief which includes approval by the
city's Executive Committee AND the City Council.  The Mayor is merely
making a nomination or recommendation.

I don't want my Councilmember to be the Mayor's rubber stamp.

MM responds:
I agree the Council should not just be a rubber stamp.  They should look
critically at who the Mayor recommends.  But, I believe they should be
looking specifically at the nomination before them and determining if that
individual is qualified.  Instead, several are looking comparatively at who
the Mayor is not selecting and pre-determining that they won't approve who
he does select.  The Mayor couldn't possibly select the top choice of all 13
Council Members, because all 13 Council Members would not agree on a top
choice.  Goodman and Colvin Roy are unhappy the Mayor didn't select a woman.
Niziolek is unhappy he isn't selecting from within the department.  Somebody
else could be unhappy if he didn't select an outsider or a minority, etc.
etc.  Using those standards to approve or not approve a nominee seems
shortsighted and ineffectual.  Council members should be looking at Rybak's
nominee and determing whether that person could serve effectively in the
position.  If they don't think the final nominee would serve the city well,
they should vote no.  That is not what I hear them saying about the two
potential candidates.

Michelle Martin
Armatage




REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


RE: [Mpls] MPLS Park Board Superintendent

2003-12-19 Thread Waltenbaugh, Kurt
Marie,

What was the process (public or otherwise) you used to determine that
the existing search was flawed and what was the new process you created
to choose John Gurban?

If the points you mention are indeed true, why the decision to subvert
the process behind closed doors and exclude nearly 50% of the elected
officials who have the elected responsibility for making the decision?  

Or will John Gurban only be representing half of the city?

KtW

Kurt Waltenbaugh
ECCO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Marie Hauser
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 8:59 AM
To: City of Minneapolis
Subject: [Mpls] MPLS Park Board Superintendent

I want to publicly state how pleased I am that John Gurban has agreed to
become
the Superintendent of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation System.  Mr.
Gurban is
an extremely qualified applicant.  He actually lives in Minneapolis,
unlike many
of the candidates.


 John Gurban is currently Executive Director of the Minnesota Parks and
Recreation Association, the state professional association.  Mr. Gurban
is
familiar
with MPLS park staff and the park system. He has extensive experience
with the
planning and implementation of parks, recreation and environmental
initiatives.
Our current Superintendent, Mary Merrill Anderson, and other park
professionals
are unanimous in their regard for Mr. Gurban's qualifications.

Mr. Gurban's previous experience includes:

- managing a recycling and environmental service

- directing parks and recreation systems in Apple Valley, MN,
British
   Columbia and Colorado

- creating a master plan for the Greater Victoria [Canada] park
system

- program manager for the Olympic Committee of Manitoba

 -strong background in environment, recreation, planning and
management.



For months the Park Board has been following a process we had
established. In
November we received a list of 7 top candidates from our search firm.
Two weeks
ago we spent several days interviewing these 7 and were especially
pleased with
the quality
of 2 of the applicants. I was really disappointed when the two most
qualified
candidates withdrew last week.

Unfortunately, the process left only less qualified candidates in the
race.  The
withdrawal of the candidates may have been caused by several of the Park
Commissioners themselves
(http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/4269752.html).
The process unfortunately became flawed.  Action was needed to produce
the best
candidate for the position.



It is vital to have strong, knowledgeable, capable leadership in these
difficult
times. We need a leader and I believe we have found one.  I urge the
community
and all Park Board Commissioners and Mr. Gurban to keep our Park system
strong.
Minneapolis does not need the embarrassment of another great candidate
withdrawing due to internal differences.



Marie Hauser, Commissioner, 3rd Park District



REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see:
http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Strib take: Insiders don't make chief cut

2003-12-19 Thread WizardMarks
Peter T Schmitz wrote:

Hiring a woman just for the sake of hiring a woman is sexist and
counterproductive. 

WM: We would not be hiring either Gerold or Lubinski just because she's 
a woman, but because, as women, they have a different perspective, one 
that cannot be gained easily as a male, if at all. Lubinski, 
particularly, has a different perspective as a member of a minority 
group. They have a myriad of other qualifications as well.

Finally, as long as council members like Goodman, Barb Johnson, Gary
Schiff, Dan Nizoliek, Scott Benson and Sandy Colvin Roy continue their
show of indifference to blacks and other groups that have been hurt by
Minneapolis law enforcement personnel, they will have much to answer for
if anther race riot breaks out during their term.
WM: I doubt that this preference shows an indifference to 'blacks and 
other groups.,' though it could be 'better the devil you know'

WizardMarks, Central

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Be nice to digest readers....

2003-12-19 Thread List Manager
And PLEASE delete the previous post if you're not quoting directly from it
in your reply.

Digest readers (who get 10-15 bundled posts in one e-mail) don't want to
scroll through repeated text.

David Brauer
List manager


REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Shenanagans, questionable appointments. etc....

2003-12-19 Thread Dyna
	First off, let me give credit where credit is due: the Republican 
Party are the premier players in this sick sport. A pro choice or in 
any way moderate republican never gets past the precinct caucus, and 
may very well get thrown out of same. Persons of color, even if they be 
upstanding citizens with multiple college degrees and dressed in 
conservative attire are routinely removed by security forces from 
Republican Party gatherings. Both major parties tend to function as job 
finding networks, finding employment for whatever good soldiers had the 
misfortune of losing their or their candidate's last election. The 
Republicans being the party of big business and bigots have much more 
corporate and fundamentalist religious resources for this sort of 
shenanigans though, so a down on their luck DFLer may very well share 
the unemployment line with the rest of us.

	Our mayor has just thumbed his nose at the MPD rank and file and 
destroyed what little morale is left in the department by going outside 
the city for a chief. historically the chief job went to the cop who 
did the best job of pounding lawn signs for the winning mayor. The 
police federation can no longer deliver a couple thousand Minneapolis 
voters for their anointed candidate, so R.T. can probably get away with 
this snub.

	Which raises the question of how R.T. got to be mayor in the first 
place. R.T. put himself on the map when his major opponent was unable 
to get an endorsement at the 2001 DFL city endorsing convention.  R.T. 
had nowhere near the support of half the delegates in that room, but 
was the beneficiary of some shenanigans of supporters of a candidate 
that had already been dropped and some devious supporters of a 
republican candidate who was camped just outside the convention. After 
a few ballots the Machiavellians won and threw the race into a primary. 
This was in fact a repeat of the 1993 endorsement battle, when 
supporters of dropped candidate Jeff Jefferson and others blocked an 
endorsement of Sharon Sayles Belton. IIRC some of the same 
Machiavellians were involved in both shenanigans.

	Fast forward to the recent botched appointments... our school board 
started this fad of attempting to bypass the deliberative selection 
process we have entrusted them with. Despite the public outcry that bit 
of favoritism brought, a bare majority of the park board has attempted 
a copycat crime, hurriedly entrusting our civic legacy of parks to 
someone we've never heard of. Pardon me, but I think we can get by for 
a few months without a Park Superintendent while the Park Board 
conducts a proper search and selection process.

	2004 will of course with a presidential election be a big year for 
shenanigans. Again the gold, silver, and bronze medals go to the 
Republicans- on our north city limits the Bush administration's 
misnamed Defense Department has managed to save 300 jobs at United 
Defense with a multi billion dollar contract. After a couple decades of 
layoffs (check out United Defense's parking lot) most every one of 
these 300 workers hair grayed long ago. We tax and spend Democrats 
could have given then a generous early retirement, retraining programs, 
etc. and saved the taxpayers billions...

	One must give the democratic machine their due though... A couple 
months back the DFL state central committee met in Willmar. On the 
agenda was a proposal to move the caucus date to early february, making 
Minnesota a major player in the presidential selection process. 
Minneapolis was virtually unrepresented at that meeting. My own 
Northside district, the 58th, was totally unrepresented. I was there 
only because I received an e-mail from the State Central Committee 
mailing list informing me of the meeting, I received no mailed notice. 
Being a member in good standing of the democratic wing of the 
Democratic Party I of course attended, only to be told that I was no 
longer a delegate...

	The national election is 10 months away, so grab a chair and enjoy the 
shenanigans. Already a couple folks are plotting a takeover of the 
Minneapolis based Stonewall DFL caucus, their barely publicized 
screenings are over and their slate is set. Stonewall DFL members may 
note that the membership renewal notice was missing from the annual 
meeting notice- that way if you forget to renew you may be denied the 
right to vote at the annual meeting. The meeting is also scheduled for 
January 10th in Minneapolis, when many Dean supporters will be 
campaigning in Iowa. Stonewall DFL could have had that meeting 
concurrent with the state central committee meeting on the 24th, but 
then all those pesky outstate members and the DFL wing of the party 
might be in attendance...

	So settle back and get ready for a big year of political shenanigans. 
Meanwhile, perhaps we should start an award for best politician 
shenanigan of the year- any nominations?

	hack'n in Hawthorne,

		Dyna Sluyter

	

	

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has 

[Mpls] Re: Back room deals at the Park Board

2003-12-19 Thread Tim Bonham
I don't see what this requirement has to do with the hiring of a 
Superintendent.

It requires a 2/3rds majority in 3 specific situations, none of which apply 
here.

Tim Bonham, Ward 12, Standish Ericsson

P.S.  That said, I still have some questions about how (and why) this 
hiring was done this way, and I will be talking to my Park Board members 
about this.  But clearly they had the legal authority to do this.

From the Park Board Charter, Charter Sec.1 p.2-3:  also Chapter 16 of the
Minneapolis City Charter:
A majority of the members of said Board shall constitute a quorum; but no
action of said Board, designating or purchasing or leasing lands, creating a
bonded debt, or filling vacancies in the Park and Recreation Board, shall be
valid unless voted for by six (6) members of said Board;
Thanks, Scott Vreeland  Seward


REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] HC Sheriff's Deputies Cleared of Sexual Assault---Sez Who?

2003-12-19 Thread William Cooley







Communities United Against Police Brutality EMAIL NEWSLETTERDecember 19, 2003** CUAPB DENOUNCES CONTINUED WHITEWASH IN PHILANDER JENKINS CASEThe following is a press statement we released to the media yesterday:The Washington County Attorney’s Office announced today that it will not prosecute the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Department for the beating and sexual assault of Philander Jenkins. While the statement released by Washington County Attorney Doug Johnson alleges that evidence of sexual assault is inconclusive, we believe his decision is tainted by politics and continues the whitewash surrounding this caseFrom the start, it is clear that the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office has taken action to prevent Philander from receiving justice in his case. It is sad to see that Washington County
 Attorney Doug Johnson has joined the coverup.Philander was put into isolation immediately after the incident and was prevented from communicating with his family. He was not permitted access to a telephone and was not allowed paper, complaint forms or writing implements. Members of his legal team were harassed and repeatedly denied visitation. One member of his legal team was arrested as he stood outside of the Hennepin County jail.Despite repeated requests, Philander was denied access to jail staff nurses after the incident. After a barrage of phone calls to the jail from the community, Philander was finally taken to Hennepin County Medical Center for medical care several hours after the assault. Initial records released from Hennepin County Medical Center indicate a disposition of “sexual assault victim.” Despite repeated efforts by Philander and his family to receive his full medical records from that visit, Hennepin Cou
 nty
 Medical Center has withheld those records for over two months.Philander’s family and the community demanded that he receive an independent medical examination from a caregiver not on the Hennepin County payroll. A court order was sought from Judge Katherian Rowe. Even before Philander’s lawyer appeared in court, Sheriff’s Department staff had ex parte communications with Judge Rowe to influence the terms of the court order. Sheriffs took Philander to his examination but took him away from the facility before the time of his appointment. His doctor arrived to find Philander gone. Judge Rowe refused to issue another court order for the exam, despite these actions by the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office.Considering this history, we are very wary about a number of gaps in the Washington County Attorney’s Office statement: * Contemporaneous statements from two inmates who saw Deputies enter Philander’s cell and
 described hearing the beating and sexual assault, including hearing Philander tell the Sheriff’s Deputies to "stop pulling down my pants" and "get your hands away from there." These statements were recorded on Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office "First Person Statement" Forms.* Information on blood or other analysis of kleenex tissues Philander used to stop anal bleeding after the attack. Philander had secreted the tissues into his jail jumpsuit and taken them to the Hennepin County Medical Center. Once there, he gave them to nurses, who put them into a plastic bag and sealed it. A chain of custody and test results for these tissues need to be produced.* Information on security videotapes of the area of Philander’s jail cell. These were noted in the witness statements. Were they preserved? Who has them?* Philander’s attorney saw him in the immediate aftermath of the assault.
 sp; We
 have seen photographs of Philander’s injuries, including scrapes, bruises and gashes on his face. His attorney saw blood on his jail jumpsuit. None of this is discussed in the statement.* The statement indicates that a rectal swab showed "no semen." Philander never stated that the sexual assault involved penile penetration. He stated that he was assaulted with a type of solid object like a stick.* There was no indication on the report of any examination for anal tears or other trauma typical of anal sexual assault.We believe that if a Black man had been accused of the kind of sexual assault Philander Jenkins experienced, Washington County Attorney Doug Johnson would be only too happy to prosecute. However, since this assault happened at the hands of Hennepin County Sheriffs, Doug Johnson refuses to prosecute and, worse, actually shows bias against Philander Jenkins in his statement.We have
 concerns, too, about the BCA investigation of this case. As soon as the BCA announced that its investigation was complete, Philander’s attorney requested copies of the findings. Officers with the BCA told Philander’s attorney that no report was ever done on the case. This statement is laughable at best and certainly could not be truthful.Because of the controversial nature of this case and because of BCA ties to local law enforcement agencies including the Hennepin County 

[Mpls] In transit

2003-12-19 Thread List Manager
As I will be traveling for the next several days, I may not be able to
quickly respond to complaints and free non-plain-text posts from the
clutches of our list server.

I strongly recommend you non-AOL non-plain-text users learn how to post
plain text, and AOL users upgrade to version 9.0, which - as detailed a few
days earlier - lets you post plain text.

I WILL still be doing my job here though, so no funny stuff!

Happy holidays,
David Brauer
List manager

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Interesting

2003-12-19 Thread Barbara Lickness
Good for you. We did the picket thing in Whittier in
92 to a bad landlord.  It certainly did send him a
wake-up call. He was pretty mad at us for awhile. But,
he didn't resort to selling, not just then anyway.

After we picketed him, he agreed to form a willing
partnership with to deal with the issues in his
properties. We didn't have CCP/SAFE in Whittier at
that time and none of the technology available today,
so we were pretty much on our own.  

This partnership resulted in his properties turning
around for the better, him becoming an active
neighborhood board member, the establishment of the
Whittier Rental Property Owners group and the
partnership with NRP for the rental property rehab
program.  The group is active today in Whittier and
has been instrumental in helping to identify ways
their peer owners can make improvements to their
properties, deal with problem tenants, create solid
meaningful leases and work together as a positive
force in the neighborhood.  

I encourage any neighborhoods with high rental
ownership to be the catalyst for rental property
owners to work together to create positive
partnerships with one another and the neighborhood. 

Barb Lickness
Whittier

=
Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the 
world.  Indeed,
it's the only thing that ever has. -- Margaret Mead
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Re: Back room deals at the Park Board

2003-12-19 Thread Svattheriver
I went back to the list archives April 2002 to try to remember the details of the renting of the Theodore Wirth House. Isn't Jon Gruban the director of the organization that rented the Wirth house for 55 cents a square foot and wouldn't allow public access to even Theodore Wirth? ( The one that is still living). 
The issue of ethics was raised about the appropriateness of gifts the organization gave to Park Board Commissioners. I don't remember all the details or any resolution to the ethics question.

Jon Gruban may be the best candidate and if so he should go the kind of process our current Superintendent went through. 
I also notice a lot of blame is being heaped on Vivian Mason.
What did she do? She asked publicly how committed the finalist was. It seems a reasonable and important question to me. It showed in retrospect how that candidate would handle public criticism. 
>From what we have seen that is an important skill.

Thanks,
Scott Vreeland Seward


Re: [Mpls] MPLS Park Board Superintendent

2003-12-19 Thread Lisa McDonald
Well if the process was flawed, than why was everyone criticizing Vivian Mason when she called it that, at the beginning. I guess according to Hauser the process is flawed only after you don't get what you want, and you want to railroad through a candidate. Maybe the two top candidates after dealing with some of these park board members decided the job wasn';t worth it if they had to work with some of them.  One good point is that the Minnesota Parks and Recreation Association, I believe, has their offices in the Park Superintendent building. So maybe they won't have to move, if Gurban decides to move in!!!  Lisa McDonald East Harriet   - Original Message - From: Marie Hauser Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:37 AM To: City of Minneapolis Subject: [Mpls] MPLS Park Board Superintendent I want to publicly state how pleased I am that John Gurban has agreed to becomethe Superintendent of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation System. Mr. Gurban isan extremely qualified applicant. He actually lives in Minneapolis, unlike manyof the candidates.John Gurban is currently Executive Director of the Minnesota Parks andRecreation Association, the state professional association. Mr. Gurban isUnfortunately, the process left only less qualified candidates in the race. Thewithdrawal of the candidates may have been caused by several of the ParkCommissioners themselves (http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/4269752.html)The process unfortunately became flawed. Action was needed to produce the bestcandidate for the position.Marie Hauser, Commissioner, 3rd Park DistrictREMINDERS:1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.htmlFor external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteractMinneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-DemocracyPost messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mplsGet more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


[Mpls] The Golden Bedspring Award

2003-12-19 Thread Binobaby
In reference to the trip to suburbia to protest at an absentee Jordan landlord's home, I'd like to contribute my memories. In the 80's, I lived in a very slowly gentrifying neighborhood in St. Louis. Some of the local activists were unhappy with some of the landlords and invented the Golden Bedspring. It was an eponymous bedspring inserted into a wooden base and spraypainted golden. After alerting the press, they would arrange a convoy of the neighbors to the landlord's home, parade up and down the sidewalk for 20-30 minutes in hope of getting some of HIS neighbors curious, then march up to the door and present the award, and deliver some sort of verbal blast.   The one time I went along, our target was not home or decided not to answer the door. But we all had a good time and considered it a success anyway. Long term, not being a neighborhood insider, I don't know how successful the GBSA was but it did serve as a rallying point for those frustrated by silence in their efforts to get a dialogue going. It may be worthwhile to try something similar here.Mark Greenwald, the Wedge  


[Mpls] Park Board - Huge Sucking Sound!

2003-12-19 Thread Eduardo Parra
Envision this:

A loud sucking sound is being reported by citizens of Minneapolis...it is 
discovered that the shenanigans of the Minneapolis Park Board and their 
behind the scenes backroom deals are the cause of this.  Apparently a staff 
toilet in the back halls of their sparkling new headquarters is the source of 
this loud noise.  It is confirmed that those Park Board Kommishes who 
supported interim Superintendent Gurbin are taking turns doing their best to 
flush all manner of democracy and decency down the toilet.  Soon it is 
spectulated that our fair city will run out of water due to the excessive 
flushing of said Kommishes.

Eduardo Parra
Cleveland
Land of 10,000 Toilet Flushes!
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Plain Text posting in Pegasus

2003-12-19 Thread phaedrus
Does anyone have instructions on how to do plain text
posting in the Pegasus email program?

Thanks,

- Jason Goray
Sheridan NE

__
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Shenanagans, questionable appointments. etc....

2003-12-19 Thread Constance Nompelis
Dyna wrote:

 A
 pro choice or in 
 any way moderate republican never gets past the
 precinct caucus, and 
 may very well get thrown out of same. 

Says who?  I am pro-choice and in support of equal
freedoms (such as contract) for glbt individuals.  If
that doesn't make me moderate I don't know what
would.

Connie Nompelis
Deputy Chair, Minneapolis Republican Committee

__
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Shenanagans, questionable appointments. etc....

2003-12-19 Thread Neal Krasnoff
Constance Nompelis wrote:

Says who?  I am pro-choice and in support of equal
freedoms (such as contract) for glbt individuals.  If
that doesn't make me moderate I don't know what
would.
 

I'm generally pro-life and against same-sex contracts - marriage -  but 
agree with the DFL on labor issues.

You're a moderate, I'm a centrist.

Neal Krasnoff
Active Member, Communications Workers of America
Loring Park
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Shenanagans, questionable appointments. etc....

2003-12-19 Thread Chris Johnson
Neal Krasnoff wrote:

Constance Nompelis wrote:

Says who?  I am pro-choice and in support of equal
freedoms (such as contract) for glbt individuals.  If
that doesn't make me moderate I don't know what
would.
 

I'm generally pro-life and against same-sex contracts - marriage -  
but agree with the DFL on labor issues.

You're a moderate, I'm a centrist.

Neal Krasnoff
Active Member, Communications Workers of America
Loring Park


I'm pro-life, pro-choice, pro-freedom, pro-labor and think government 
should get out of the marriage business and leave it to churches.

I'm a right-wing, conservative Republican.

Chris Johnson
Fulton


REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Background for Park Board Back room deals

2003-12-19 Thread Svattheriver
Here is the context and the content of the controversy about the Wirth House:

From: STAR TRIBUNE (Mpls.-St. Paul) Newspaper of the Twin Cities
Headline: Gift to park employees challenged // Free memberships in
association may violate law
Date: 07/02/02
Section: NEWS
Page: 03B
Edition: METRO
Byline: Steve Brandt; Staff Writer
Length: 13.9
Subject: minneapolis;employee;park;building;law;ethics
Slug: PARK02



 
   About 150 Minneapolis park employees may have run afoul of a 
state law by accepting free memberships in a state association that 
rents the house that used to be occupied by park superintendents.   The
1994 law prohibits public employees from accepting most gifts 
from people or entities with a direct financial interest in their 
decisions. The free memberships might well be improper, said 
state Sen. John Marty, DFL-Roseville, who was one of the law's 
sponsors.   A formal park system policy also prohibits employees from 
receiving anything of value from a person or association with which 
the park system does business.   The Minnesota Recreation and Park
Association, which has leased 
the superintendent's house since 1997, values the 150 memberships 
at $19,000 annually. The association is a professional organization 
for park and recreation workers.   Assistant Park Superintendent Mike
Schmidt says the benefits of 
membership include a newsletter and training sessions for park 
employees. He maintained that the law's restrictions apply only to 
gifts from lobbyists.   Nonetheless, following a Star Tribune inquiry,
the park system 
said that the top six park officials, including Superintendent Mary 
Merrill Anderson, now will pay their own memberships. Schmidt said 
we thought it was better if we stepped back at this level.   The
state association disclosed the free memberships after the 
Park Board was criticized by some for not charging enough rent. The 
association pays $9,000 annually and said it pays another $1,000 
voluntarily for maintenance. It described the free memberships as 
an added value of the lease, although the lease does not mention them. 
The lease dates to 1997, after David Fisher, then the park 
superintendent, decided he didn't want to live in the house any 
more. The house was built in Lyndale Farmstead Park in 1910 to 
entice Theodore Wirth to Minneapolis, and it was the place where 
the legendary superintendent and his staff ultimately sketched many 
of the designs for popular city parks.   Jon Gurban, the state
association's executive director, called it 
an incredible stretch to connect the free memberships and the 
law. He said his group has solved an issue for the park system by 
occupying a deteriorating building. The park system installed air 
conditioning, replaced single-pane windows, improved insulation and 
refinished floors. The association paid the first $5,000, and the 
Park Board paid the balance. Schmidt said he didn't recall the amount. 
  The original lease was for two years, and the association began a 
second three-year extension Monday.   The Park Board must pay $10,000
if it wishes to buy out the lease 
before it expires in 2005. The Minneapolis Park Legacy Society has 
been lobbying to use the house's first floor for exhibits on park 
system history.   .  

Written by - Steve Brandt at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
612-673-4438. 



In my humble opinion this was and is a bad financial deal for the Park Board and 
citizens. This no bid, cozy relation and lack of process and exchange of gifts is 
indicative of insider deals.
We also have an interesting quote from Jon Gurban.

Thanks,
Scott Vreeland  Seward

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Back room deals at the Park Board

2003-12-19 Thread Annie Young

Unfortunately Scott - we already had checked this a couple of weeks
before. It applies to filling vacancies for Commissioner not for
choosing the Superintendent. Nice try!
Annie Young
citywide Park Commissioner
At 05:25 AM 12/19/03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the Park Board
Charter, Charter Sec.1 p.2-3: also Chapter 16 of the Minneapolis
City Charter:
A majority of the members of said Board shall constitute a quorum;
but no action of said Board, designating or purchasing or leasing lands,
creating a bonded debt, or filling vacancies in the Park and Recreation
Board, shall be valid unless voted for by six (6) members of said
Board;
Thanks, Scott Vreeland
Seward

Annie Young
Stand Up ~ Keep Fighting








[Mpls] Fwd: Meet the Final Candidate for Chief of Police! (picket signs optional)

2003-12-19 Thread Dyna
	This slithered in while I was at work today...

Begin forwarded message:

Come Meet the final candidate for Minneapolis Police Chief.

YOUR INPUT INVITED  THIS IS YOUR CHANCE!!
	Why wasn't our input sought before the final choice had been made?

on Saturday, Dec. 20, at 2:00 p.m., Rm. 333 City Hall.Mayor R.T. 
Rybak has set up a time for members of the GLBT communities, and our 
allies, to meet the person he is recommending to be the next chief of 
police for Minneapolis.
	The mayoral media machine is clearly at work here- knowing that R.T.'s 
choice will be a tough sell at the council they're trying to co-opt the 
GLBT community into supporting said mayor's choice.

Come meet the finalist before the City Council goes forward on the 
hiring; give your input and ask questions in person. The name will be 
announced to the public at a noon press conference in the Rotunda.
	OK, we have the media dog and pony show scheduled at noon, and the 
GLBT contingent penciled in for 2 o'clock. What group will the mayor be 
lobbying at 1 and maybe 3 p.m.? And will the council be introduced to 
the possible new chief in the morning, or given the mushroom treatment?	
The Mayor is especially eager to hear our voices, as well as for us 
to hear directly from the candidate.
	After he's already made his choice...

Thank you for working this in between your holiday shopping 
excursions!

 OutFront 
Minnesota
	giggling in Hawthorne,

		Dyna Sluyter

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


Re: [Mpls] Background for Park Board Back room deals

2003-12-19 Thread Chris Johnson
Here is the context and the content of the controversy about the Wirth 
House:

From: STAR TRIBUNE (Mpls.-St. Paul) Newspaper of the Twin Cities
Headline: Gift to park employees challenged // Free memberships in
association may violate law
Date: 07/02/02
Section: NEWS
Page: 03B
Edition: METRO
Byline: Steve Brandt; Staff Writer
Length: 13.9
Subject: minneapolis;employee;park;building;law;ethics
Slug: PARK02



  About 150 Minneapolis park employees may have run afoul of a 
state law by accepting free memberships in a state association that 
rents the house that used to be occupied by park superintendents.   The
1994 law prohibits public employees from accepting most gifts 
from people or entities with a direct financial interest in their 
decisions. The free memberships might well be improper, said 
state Sen. John Marty, DFL-Roseville, who was one of the law's 
sponsors.   A formal park system policy also prohibits employees from 
receiving anything of value from a person or association with which 
the park system does business.   The Minnesota Recreation and Park
Association, which has leased 
the superintendent's house since 1997, values the 150 memberships 
at $19,000 annually. 

[snip]

  The
state association disclosed the free memberships after the 
Park Board was criticized by some for not charging enough rent. The 
association pays $9,000 annually and said it pays another $1,000 
voluntarily for maintenance. It described the free memberships as 
an added value of the lease, although the lease does not mention them. 
 

Think there's any comparable property I can lease for only $9,000 a 
year?  Let's see, large historic home located in a park in a highly 
desirable neighborhood near a lake for only $750 a month.  I'd be lucky 
to get a one-bedroom apartment in that kind of location for that money.

Jon Gurban, the state
association's executive director, called it 
an incredible stretch to connect the free memberships and the 
law. He said his group has solved an issue for the park system by 
occupying a deteriorating building. The park system installed air 
conditioning, replaced single-pane windows, improved insulation and 
refinished floors. The association paid the first $5,000, and the 
Park Board paid the balance. Schmidt said he didn't recall the amount. 
 

Having done rehab work on a hundred year old house before, I'd bet the 
Park Board paid $20,000 to $100,000 for its share of this work.  The 
$5,000 from Gurban's association is a pittance, not the generous 
solving an issue he tries to make it sound like.

 The original lease was for two years, and the association began a 
second three-year extension Monday.   The Park Board must pay $10,000
if it wishes to buy out the lease 
before it expires in 2005.

I say kick them out at the end of their lease.  If we weren't short 
money, I'd say kick them out now.

I've been mistakenly on the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association's 
mailing list for much of the past year.  Their missives have been 
interesting reading.  From my perspective, it seems their primary 
purpose is to lobby and politick for more spending and perks for their 
members.  That's not illegal, but it sure isn't altruistic, either.

Chris Johnson
Fulton
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


[Mpls] Re: MPD: Mpls Mayor wants to micro-manage police dept

2003-12-19 Thread Andy Driscoll
Ahh, but, Erik, In Minneapolis, the Mayor retains authority over the police
department, one of the several positions he oversees. This is far different
from a civilian review board which should be designed - but never is, given
police politics - to review only complaints against officers that are not
sustained by the Internal Affairs Unit. The day-today oversight remains in
the Mayor's office.

In both Minneapolis and St. Paul charters, police chiefs (and fire chiefs)
receive terms-certain (in St. Paul, it's six years, overlapping 4-year
mayoral terms, theoretically to insulate the police and fire functions from
politics. Actually, those arrangements have been to the detriment of
communities wanting greater control over the police and fire functions, more
accountability from both. Chiefs should be, as are all other department
heads, selected and retained at the will and pleasure of the Mayor(s).

Absent that, Mayors and Councilmembers cannot be held accountable for
renegade cops, firefighters and chiefs, and they should be. This is not good
government.

In any event, one of the few truly powerful oversight responsibilities the
Mayor has is the selection of the chief and oversight of the cops. As for
the Council(s), they still have advise and consent authority, another
critical role in the balance of power.

Andy Driscoll
Saint Paul
 

 From: Erik Hare [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:43:01 -0600 (CST)
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: Minneapolis Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: MPD: Mpls Mayor wants to micro-manage police dept
 
 
 On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Andy Driscoll wrote:
 
 The police department of any city is in desperate need of oversight from
 elected officials.
 
 In general, I agree with Andy on this point.  The need for civilian
 oversight is glaring and obvious.  The department has had plenty of
 opportunity to reform itself, and failed utterly.
 
 It's the mayor's job to ride herd on the cops.
 
 This is where I'm concerned.  Certainly, the inability (or lack of
 interest) of the council in providing for a real civilian review board has
 been a major problem.  And in a weak mayor system, what ultimately can the
 mayor do?
 
 Let's say that the new chief is picked on the willingness to be Rybak's
 boy.  Even if that is the case, how long will the politics of the
 situation allow such a chief to continue to be under the thumb of the
 mayor?  If a chief was openly the mayor's choice, how much would that
 chief be undermined immediately?
 
 The weak mayor system puts all responsibility like this ultimately with
 the council.  Certainly, Rybak should try his best and hope for either
 support or at least an abstention from the council.  But the power game
 aspect of it alone makes this sound very unlikely to me.
 
 Erik Hare  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://tcfreenet.org/people/hare
 Irvine Park, West End, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA, North America, Earth
 
 Fine Amish furniture, cedar chests, and crafts  http://www.harmonycedar.com
 
 
 
 
 
 MN-POLITICS-DISCUSS http://www.e-democracy.org/mn-politics/ is a CIVIL
 discussion of Minnesota public issues and politics.
 ---
 
 
  Don't like E-Democracy's rules? You have alternatives:
 http://www.e-democracy.org/mninteract 
 
 
 Messages (text-only, no attachments) are to be signed with your full real
 name, city and e-mail address.  No member may post more than twice a day.
 
 Moderator/Discussion Rules Manager:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -
 To unsubscribe to MN-Politics-Discuss send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To receive daily digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For the list to retain its value, and to show respect for your fellow list
 members, please keep a Minnesota focus on your posts.  Thanks.
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mn-politics-discuss/
 
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 
 

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls