Re: Location of mutt manual

2000-06-16 Thread clemensF

> John Poltorak:

> Where do users normally install the html version of mutt's manual?

usually /usr/local/share/doc/mutt/

clemens



Re: A nice feature

2000-06-16 Thread Curt Zirzow

* John Franklin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000615 07:55]:
> hops) away via IMAP to access my e-mail.  When I press 'd', it marks
> it as deleted in the local header tree on box A, but doesn't set the
> flag on the remote box B IMAP server.  When I do a re-sync, mutt goes

Hmm.. my [d] flags the message on the remote IMAP server.

I'm currently using Mutt 1.2i client to a cyrus IMAP server (unkown version).


curt
-- 
Any time things appear to be going better, you have overlooked
something.



Re: Location of mutt manual

2000-06-16 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

John Poltorak proclaimed on mutt-users that: 

>Where do users normally install the html version of mutt's manual?
>
>I have set F1 to display the manual in Lynx. I'm just not sure where it
>should go. It's in TMP at the moment.

$install_dir/local/doc/mutt/html is the default (typically /usr/local/...)

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian + [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The Schizophrenic: An Unauthorized Autobiography"



Re: Why mutt is the best mail program?

2000-06-16 Thread Gottipati Aravind

Sometime around Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 07:03:02AM +0200, Mipam said:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 09:47:33PM +0200, Martynas Kriauciunas wrote:
> > Hello,
> > In my pop3 server is installed Pine and Mailx. I asked administrator to 
> > install Mutt too, but he asked me to tell some things what mutt can do that
> > other mail programs can't (Pine or Mailx). Now I'm asking You.

man..
/ = search in mutt
w = search in pine
that alone is worth it! :)
Aravind



Re: index out of sync -- bug?

2000-06-16 Thread Ben Beuchler

On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 06:22:10PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:

> Also look into running Mutt with the -d 4 switch and possibly providing
> the IMAP developers with a trace of what's happening (~/.muttbug0 if I
> remember right the file name)...  Mostly the IMAP code is done by
> Brendan Cully, since he's not yet commented, I assume this means he's
> too busy right now.  Hopefully he'll have time to address your bug
> report in a little bit. :-)

Will do.  And it's always a pleasure to work with Brendan.  He's been
extremely helpful and responsive in the past.

Ben

-- 
The spectre of a polity controlled by the fads and whims of voters who
actually believe that there are significant differences between Bud Lite
and Miller Lite, and who think that professional wrestling is for real, is
naturally alarming to people who don't.
-- Neal Stephenson



Re: index out of sync -- bug?

2000-06-16 Thread Ben Beuchler

On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 03:38:54AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:

> As a way of debugging, you could try to see if it's deterministic or
> random -- ie. if you do the exact same set of actions, say, jump to
> message 500, go page down, view a message, then do you always get the
> same wrong message, or a different one?
> 
> If you can reproduce it in your setup, then it's definitely a logic
> error or some other kind of bug in Mutt.  On the other hand, if it
> varies every time, then it's affected by some random other outside
> property, which could be the IMAP server for instance...

I'll try that, although I strongly suspect it is not a problem with the
IMAP server as I've seen the problem with two different IMAP servers: UofW
and Courier.

Ben

-- 
The spectre of a polity controlled by the fads and whims of voters who
actually believe that there are significant differences between Bud Lite
and Miller Lite, and who think that professional wrestling is for real, is
naturally alarming to people who don't.
-- Neal Stephenson



Location of mutt manual

2000-06-16 Thread John Poltorak

Where do users normally install the html version of mutt's manual?

I have set F1 to display the manual in Lynx. I'm just not sure where it
should go. It's in TMP at the moment.

--
John




Re: where to get pgp6 src?

2000-06-16 Thread David T-G

Dirk --

...and then Dirk Pirschel said...
% Hi David,

Hello!


% 
% > Anyone know where I can get pgp6x sources?  The MIT page linked from
% 
% http://www.pgpi.org/products/nai/pgp/versions/freeware/unix/6.5.1i/download/

Aha!  Thanks a really lot!  I'll definitely be putting pgpi (duh, I
guess) in my bookmarks file this time :-)


% 
% Dirk


:-D
-- 
David T-G   * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED]  * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
The "new millennium" starts at the beginning of 2001.  There was no year 0.
Note: If bigfoot.com gives you fits, try sector13.org in its place. *sigh*


 PGP signature


Re: where to get pgp6 src?

2000-06-16 Thread Dirk Pirschel

Hi David,

* David T-G wrote on Fri, 16 Jun 2000:

> Anyone know where I can get pgp6x sources?  The MIT page linked from
> pgp.com only has a binary, and root just hates that here...

http://www.pgpi.org/products/nai/pgp/versions/freeware/unix/6.5.1i/download/

Dirk



where to get pgp6 src?

2000-06-16 Thread David T-G

Hi again --

Anyone know where I can get pgp6x sources?  The MIT page linked from
pgp.com only has a binary, and root just hates that here...


TIA!

:-D
-- 
David T-G   * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED]  * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
The "new millennium" starts at the beginning of 2001.  There was no year 0.
Note: If bigfoot.com gives you fits, try sector13.org in its place. *sigh*


 PGP signature


mutt 1.2 and pgp5 and ...

2000-06-16 Thread David T-G

Hi, folks --

So I'm finally working on my muttrc for mutt-1.2 in expectation of the
release of 1.2.1 and I seem to be having some trouble with the pgp5.rc
file.  I can sign, but I get asked for the keyid any time I want to
encrypt.  Needless to say, I don't have all of that hex in my head :-)

I also can't find pgpewrap on my system, and vaguely recall some mention
of it as a contrib -- but also didn't see it in the mutt-1.2i tarball.
Perhaps the problem above is related to this.

So what do I do now? :-)


TIA

:-D
-- 
David T-G   * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED]  * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
The "new millennium" starts at the beginning of 2001.  There was no year 0.
Note: If bigfoot.com gives you fits, try sector13.org in its place. *sigh*


 PGP signature


Re: [bug?] pager_index_lines

2000-06-16 Thread Marius Gedminas

On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 02:08:51AM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> Suggested documentation patch:
> 
> --- init.h  2000/06/15 21:37:05 2.96
> +++ init.h  2000/06/16 00:07:36
> @@ -1057,9 +1057,9 @@
>** remain to be read in the current thread.  One of the lines is reserved
>** for the status bar from the index, so a \fIpager_index_lines\fP of 6
>** will only show 5 lines of the actual index.  A value of 0 results in
> -  ** no index being shown.  If the number of messages in the current folder
> -  ** is less than \fIpager_index_lines\fP, then the index will only use as
> -  ** many lines as it needs.
> +  ** no index being shown.  If the number of visible messages in the current
> +  ** folder is less than \fIpager_index_lines\fP, then the index will only
> +  ** use as any lines as it needs.
   ^^^

Should be `many'.  Thanks, David.

Marius Gedminas
-- 
Bumper sticker: Alcohol and calculus don't mix.  Never drink and derive.



Re: Mailing Lists problem

2000-06-16 Thread Lars Hecking


> OK, here they are (quoted):
 
> > From: Neil Zanella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Frank Heckenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > cc: ncurses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 ^^^
 but you have

 lists ... bug-ncurses-request
 mailboxes ... =ncurses-request

 in .muttrc. Change both to bug-ncurses, and it should work.

> Perhaps I could "fix" it by changing the name of the list (in the .muttrc)
> to "bug-ncurses" since that seems to be in one header or another in 
> most of the messages in that mailbox (some in To:, some in cc:, some
> nowhere)

 Spot on.




Re: muttrc.el

2000-06-16 Thread Thomas Dickey

On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 09:08:02PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
 
> I've grepped RFC-1855 (Netiquette Guidelines), but couldn't find
> anything about quoting styles.

I've seen (but don't recall details) something for this cited on
software.news.readers - I'd ask there.

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com



Re: Mailing Lists problem

2000-06-16 Thread Frank Derichsweiler

On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 10:52:48PM -0400, fred smith wrote:
> Perhaps I could "fix" it by changing the name of the list (in the .muttrc)
> to "bug-ncurses" since that seems to be in one header or another in 

In the first post you listed -request as the mailing list
address. IMHo a -request is only used for (un-) subscribing. I would
suggest to remove that part and then ...

HTH
Frank




Re: Why mutt is the best mail program?

2000-06-16 Thread Martin Schröder

On 2000-06-16 04:08:42 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> - threading
> - extremely customizable: key bindings, arbitrary key macros, most
> display formats, various hooks for conditional commands
> - quad-options for a lot of settings (yes, no, ask-yes, ask-no)
> - Maildir support
> - mailing list support

- pgp/gpg support
- full mime support
- gpl

Best regards
Martin
-- 
  Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
   Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10

 PGP signature


Re: [bug?] pager_index_lines

2000-06-16 Thread Byrial Jensen

On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 20:13:24 +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> Today a strange thing occured to me: setting pager_index_lines to 4 or
> 10 (I have macros for this) gave me just one index line on top.

If there only is one message in your mailbox, you will only get one
index line. If there is more messages this should not happen.

Can you give a recipe to reproduce it?

-- 
Byrial
http://home.worldonline.dk/~byrial/



Re: mutt 1.0.1us as an imap client

2000-06-16 Thread Byrial Jensen

On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 13:23:13 -0500, Enrique Vadillo wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying to use mutt 1.0.1us with courier-imap using maildirs,

I would advice you to get Mutt 1.2 which have several enhancements
in IMAP support over 1.0. You could also wait a few days and get
the soon-coming bugfix release 1.2.1.

> I would like to know how i can configure my mutt to work with either
> imap (i've compiled it with --enable-imap) or as a localhost mail reader
> 
> reading directly from  qmail'sMaildirs.
> 
> BTW do you see any problem/advantage with either implementation?

No, Mutt works fine with both maildirs and IMAP.

-- 
Byrial
http://home.worldonline.dk/~byrial/



Re: Mailing Lists problem

2000-06-16 Thread fred smith

On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 12:01:28AM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
> fred smith writes:
> > Hi guys!
> > 
> > i've been using mutt for quite a while now and mostly it does what I
> > need, but my needs are pretty modest, I don't stress it a lot.
> > 
> > I'm subscribed to several mailing lists, and have procmail set up to
> > filter them out to their own folders, and the appropriate settings in my
> > .muttrc so that when replying to a message in one of those lists' folders,
> > I can use 'L' to do it.
> > 
> > I recently discovered, however, that when I'm in the folder for the
> > ncurses mailing list, that hitting 'L' results in the message:
> > 
> > No mailing lists found!
> 
>  (I'd like to see the complete headers of such a mail message).

OK, here they are (quoted):

> From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thu Jun 15 22:41:21 2000
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: (from uucp@localhost)
> by fcshome.stoneham.ma.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id WAA12796
> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 22:41:13 -0400
> Received: from mescaline.gnu.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>[158.121.106.21])
> by news-in.ConnActivity.com (8.9.1a/8.9.0) with ESMTP id UAA22544
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 20:29:57 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: (from slist@localhost)
> by mescaline.gnu.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id UAA00224
> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 20:29:55 -0400
> Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 20:29:55 -0400
> Received: from garfield.cs.mun.ca ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [134.153.1.1])
> by mescaline.gnu.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA29439
>   for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 20:10:02 -0400
>  Received: from localhost (nzanella@localhost)
> by garfield.cs.mun.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA02546;
> Thu, 15 Jun 2000 21:39:46 -0230 (NDT)
> Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 21:39:45 -0230 (NDT)
> From: Neil Zanella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Frank Heckenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: ncurses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: another resize bug: ^@ as output

> 
> > which I can't figure out. it's not configured any differently (that I can
> > see) than other lists in which 'L' DOES work.
> 
>  Known problem, to me at least :)
> 
>  Mutt doesn't recognise lists if the list address is not in the From:,
>  To:, or Cc: header. E.g. it doesn't check the From_, or Sender: header.

Oh, then I guess it makes sense. So is it Mutt's fault, or is it the
list-server's fault for not building correct headers?

Perhaps I could "fix" it by changing the name of the list (in the .muttrc)
to "bug-ncurses" since that seems to be in one header or another in 
most of the messages in that mailbox (some in To:, some in cc:, some
nowhere)

> 
>  Possible ways to deal with this have been discussed here and on
>  mutt-dev, but nobody has implemented anything yet.

Thanks!
-- 
---
 .Fred Smith/  
( /__  ,__.   __   __ /  __   : /  
 //  /   /__) /  /  /__) .+'   Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
//  (__ (___ (__(_ (___ / :__ 781-438-5471 
 Jude 1:24,25 -