Default Mailbox problem

2000-12-28 Thread Peter Dobrev

Hello everybody!
I've got very little experience in Mutt and I've got a problem. When Mutt
starts it automaticly open /var/spool/mail/peterdob. I've set the mbox
variable to "~/mail/Inbox". I want Mutt to open ~/mail/Inbox by default and store the
new messages there (to move them from /var/spool/mail/peterdob). Is this
possible and how? Thank you!
Best Wishes, Peter! 



Re: Default Mailbox problem

2000-12-28 Thread Frank Naumann

Hallo Peter,
try procmail. You will have to create a file ~/.procmailrc with the
following content:

# ~/.procmailrc
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin
MAILDIR=$HOME/mail
DEFAULT=$MAILDIR/Inbox
LOGFILE=$MAILDIR/log 

Greetings,
Frank


On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 11:50:46AM -0200, Peter Dobrev wrote:
 When Mutt
 starts it automaticly open /var/spool/mail/peterdob. I've set the
 mbox
 variable to "~/mail/Inbox". I want Mutt to open ~/mail/Inbox by
 default and store the
 new messages there (to move them from /var/spool/mail/peterdob).
   
-- 

Hi! I'm the infamous .signature virus!
Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!




Re: Default Mailbox problem

2000-12-28 Thread Abhay Ghaisas

Hi,

Frank Naumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote --
 try procmail. You will have to create a file ~/.procmailrc with the
[snip -- useful .procmailrc info]

 On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 11:50:46AM -0200, Peter Dobrev wrote:
  When Mutt
  starts it automaticly open /var/spool/mail/peterdob. I've set the
  mbox
  variable to "~/mail/Inbox". I want Mutt to open ~/mail/Inbox by
  default and store the
  new messages there (to move them from /var/spool/mail/peterdob).

Procmail will take care of saving messages in different inbox for you.
To make that the default spool mailbox for mutt, you will have to set
the "spoolfile" variable instead of "mbox" variable like:

set spoolfile=+Inbox

BTW, for the correct expansion of "+" to "~/mail", you will also have to
set the folder variable to "~/mail" like:

set folder="~/mail"

That, with procmail, would be what the doctor ordered.

Regards,
Abhay.
-- 
Abhay Ghaisas / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Motorola India Electronics Ltd., Bangalore, India.



Re: Extra line added on edit message

2000-12-28 Thread Abhay Ghaisas

Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote --
 On Thursday 28 December 2000 11:34, Abhay Ghaisas wrote:
[snip]
  piled up at the end of the message.  Is this done with some reason or
  is it just a bug?
 
 Looks like a harmless feature to me :)

Quite harmless when hand-editing the messages; a bit of annoyance when
mixed with scripts :)

  I am using some scripts for cleaning up some mails by setting editor
  variable to script name.  And, every time I try it, new lines get
  added at end.
 
 Could you share this script?  Or you could just archive mails by using 
 date-wise folders in your .procmailrc (say mails from mutt-users in 
 march get appended to mutt-users-march)

I think I misled you with the clean-up part.  The script does not
clean-up the mail-box by removing mails; I invoke it on individual mails
to do clean-up like removing the pesky advertisements that some mailing
list hosts like e-groups add.  Also for some other tasks like getting
rid of too many additional newlines at the end (now, isn't that ironic
considering this misfeature :) or removing excessive quoting done by
some people.

Regards,
Abhay.
-- 
Abhay Ghaisas / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Motorola India Electronics Ltd., Bangalore, India.



Re: Extra line added on edit message

2000-12-28 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

Abhay Ghaisas proclaimed on mutt-users that: 

 I think I misled you with the clean-up part.  The script does not
 clean-up the mail-box by removing mails; I invoke it on individual mails
 to do clean-up like removing the pesky advertisements that some mailing
 list hosts like e-groups add.  Also for some other tasks like getting

hmmm... couldn't you do that with procmail + sed / awk etc _before_ the mail
lands in your mailbox?

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI
EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin



Re: Default Mailbox problem

2000-12-28 Thread Dirk Ruediger

Hi,

On Thu, Dec 28, 2000, Frank Naumann wrote:

 Hallo Peter,
 try procmail. You will have to create a file ~/.procmailrc with the
 following content:
 
 # ~/.procmailrc
 PATH=/bin:/usr/bin
 MAILDIR=$HOME/mail
 DEFAULT=$MAILDIR/Inbox
 LOGFILE=$MAILDIR/log 
 
 Greetings,
 Frank
 
 
 On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 11:50:46AM -0200, Peter Dobrev wrote:
  When Mutt starts it automaticly open /var/spool/mail/peterdob. I've
  set the mbox variable to "~/mail/Inbox". I want Mutt to open
  ~/mail/Inbox by default and store the new messages there (to move
  them from /var/spool/mail/peterdob).

You forgot to mention, that you have to create a file ~/.forward
with the contents (yust this one line):
|procmail

Your MTA (sendmail etc.) reads this file and (in this case) pipes the
mail through procmail.

Ciao for now, Dirk
-- 
Dirk Ruediger, Rostock, Germany
 
Going to church does not make a person religious, nor does going to school
make a person educated, any more than going to a garage makes a person a car.



Thank you and another question

2000-12-28 Thread Peter Dobrev

Thank you for the help!
Here's another question :)
Well is there any way to configure Mutt to use a STMP server?
I'll be very glad if you answer me !
Thank you!
Peter!



Re: Default Mailbox problem

2000-12-28 Thread Frank Naumann

Hello Dirk,
sorry. I forgot to explain, that i use fetchmail to poll from a
foreign pop server. If so, you do not need ~/.forward.

Greetings,
Frank

On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:03:38PM +0100, Dirk Ruediger wrote:
 
 You forgot to mention, that you have to create a file ~/.forward
 with the contents (yust this one line):
 |procmail

-- 

Hi! I'm the infamous .signature virus!
Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!




Re: Thank you and another question

2000-12-28 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

Peter Dobrev proclaimed on mutt-users that: 

 Thank you for the help!
 Here's another question :)
 Well is there any way to configure Mutt to use a STMP server?

mutt can't use any specific smtp server ... configure whatever MTA you are
running on that box (sendmail, postfix, qmail) to smarthost through the smtp
server of your choice, or compile something like MasqMail / NullMailer (search
for them on freshmeat) and use that.

--suresh

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI
EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin



Re: Thank you and another question

2000-12-28 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt

On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 03:08:34PM -0200, Peter Dobrev wrote:

 Well is there any way to configure Mutt to use a STMP server?

No. Mutt always uses a program to send it's mail. That program does talk to
servers via SMTP, if needed.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Engineerinnominate AG
Diplom-Informatiker the linux architects - alive and kicking
tel: +49.30.308806-62  fax: -698  www.innominate.com

 PGP signature


Re: Thank you and another question

2000-12-28 Thread David Merrill

On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 02:21:58PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 03:08:34PM -0200, Peter Dobrev wrote:
 
  Well is there any way to configure Mutt to use a STMP server?
 
 No. Mutt always uses a program to send it's mail. That program does talk to
 servers via SMTP, if needed.

There is a very thin MTA available that is designed to shuffle your
request off to some other SMTP server. I don't remember what it's
called atm, but such a creature does exist. I think I read about it in
the mutt docs somewhere, but I can't seem to find it now.

-- 
Dr. David C. Merrill http://www.lupercalia.net
Linux Documentation Project[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Collection Editor  Coordinatorhttp://www.linuxdoc.org
   Finger me for my public key

To the cross roads I must go
To find a world unseen
Fear and wonder will I know,
And be a bridge between
-- To the Crossroads, Starhawk



Re: Thank you and another question

2000-12-28 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

David Merrill proclaimed on mutt-users that: 

 There is a very thin MTA available that is designed to shuffle your
 request off to some other SMTP server. I don't remember what it's
 called atm, but such a creature does exist. I think I read about it in
 the mutt docs somewhere, but I can't seem to find it now.
 
 Plenty of them (masqmail, nullmailer and such).

--suresh

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI
EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin



Re: Extra line added on edit message

2000-12-28 Thread David Champion

On 2000.12.28, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Suresh Ramasubramanian" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I am using some scripts for cleaning up some mails by setting editor
  variable to script name.  And, every time I try it, new lines get
  added at end.
 
 Could you share this script?  Or you could just archive mails by using 
 date-wise folders in your .procmailrc (say mails from mutt-users in 
 march get appended to mutt-users-march)

I'm using this to macro-reply to messages with some stock response
text.

macro   attach  \;m "enter-commandset 
wait_key=noenterpipe-entrymm-replyenterenter-commandset wait_key=yesenter" 
"Send Mailman completion message"

"mm-reply" is attached.  It's an "attach" macro because I use it only
to reply to MIME message/rfc822 components.  It probably could be a
"normal" macro if you wanted to do that kind of thing.

-- 
 -D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago


#!/bin/sh

TMP=/tmp/mutt-formail-$$

mailquote () {
awk '
ok==1   { printf " "; }
/^$/{ ok=1; }
{ print; }'
}

formail -brkt \
| mailquote \
| sed -e 's/^$/\
done\
/'  ${TMP}

/dev/tty /opt/bin/mutt -H ${TMP} \
-e 'set abort_unmodified=no' \
-e 'set editor=/bin/true' \
-e 'macro compose e "\enter-command\set 
editor=\"vi\"\enter\\edit-message\"'

/bin/rm -f ${TMP}