slow imap/getting list of new folders
Hi all. Firstly I'd like to thank all the mutt developers for really putting together a great mailer. I've tried a bunch recently and mutt is among the most promising. It is very configurable and puts a lot of power at your fingertips. However, I'm experiencing two big problems I haven't figured out how to solve from the documentation: 1. How do I get a list of folders with new messages in them? What I'd like is to press a button and get a numbered list of folders with the number of new messages in them. Then to change folder I could just type in the number. Or maybe Mutt works some other way. Just right now I don't see an easy way to see a summary of how many new messages are in which folders. I was thinking of trying to come up with a script myself that would produce such a listing. If I did, it looks like it would be easy in Mutt to bind that to a key, but how would that script communicate the command to change to a particular folder? Is that possible with Mutt? I wanted to make sure before I tried writing the script. 2. Changing folders is really slow. Right now I'm using IMAP and it seems to take about a full second for every 1000 messages in the folder. By contrast, I'd say Evolution was about twice (?) as fast when initially reading the folder upon startup, and very fast (1.5-2+ orders of magnitude faster) when revisiting one. I'm not especially wedded to IMAP (with Mutt I can just ssh into my machine) so if the answer is that Mutt isn't good with imap and much better with mbox or mh or whatever, that's fine. I just didn't want to spend an hour switching everything and then only get a 2x speedup or something. Also, I saw a maildir header caching patch by Michael Elkins - is that relevant to my problem? Thanks for any advice on these two problems. -- Ben Escoto msg29741/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: slow imap/getting list of new folders
Ben Escoto wrote: 1. How do I get a list of folders with new messages in them? What I'd like is to press a button and get a numbered list of folders with the number of new messages in them. Then to change folder I could just type in the number. well you have to define which mailboxes you want to receive incoming mail; ie: mailboxes ! +labels +admin +cron or something like that (they can be all on one line or split over multiple lines, i believe). to see the list, start mutt with 'mutt -y', or hit change-folder?CR (you can make a macro for this if you want; i was used to PINE so i bound ',' to this). 2. Changing folders is really slow. Right now I'm using IMAP and it seems to take about a full second for every 1000 messages in the folder. By contrast, I'd say Evolution was about twice (?) as fast when initially reading the folder upon startup, and very fast (1.5-2+ orders of magnitude faster) when revisiting one. evolution caches IMAP mail IIRC; mutt does not... I'm not especially wedded to IMAP (with Mutt I can just ssh into my machine) so if the answer is that Mutt isn't good with imap and much better with mbox or mh or whatever, that's fine. I just didn't want to spend an hour switching everything and then only get a 2x speedup or something. it will almost definitely be faster with local mbox folders. Also, I saw a maildir header caching patch by Michael Elkins - is that relevant to my problem? only if you're using Maildir. helps out a bit (a lot in certain cases). -- Will Yardley input: william hq . newdream . net .
Re: Several questions
On 2002-07-17 21:15, Philip White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) I have Mutt color my new mails yellow, which it dutifully does when a new e-mail arrives. However, if I elect not to read it at that moment, close the client, then reopen it, the e-mail is no longer yellow even though it's unread, and the mailserver knows it (its web interface shows it as being unread). Perhaps I have it coloring the wrong e-mail status? Perhaps there's a different setting for coloring not-immediately-new-but-unread e-mails? color yellow default index ~U The ~U pattern matches all unread (including new) mail. 2) The IMAP server contains Trash and Sent Items folders for my use. ~ How can I configure Mutt to automatically place copies of outgoing mail into Sent Items and place deleted mails into Trash? Sent items is easy: set record /sent/mail/folder Of course, replace /sent/mail/folder with whatever the real path to your Sent Items folder is. I don't have a good answer for the trash folder. You could set up some macros that save the file in your trash folder when you press 'd' instead of deleting them outright (saving to another folder deletes the message from the current folder). Then setup a folder hook so that pressing 'd' while in the trash folder really deletes. The only real problem with this is that other deleting in ways other than just pressing 'd' won't utilize the trash folder. -- Luke
Re: Several questions
Luke Ravitch wrote: I don't have a good answer for the trash folder. You could set up some macros that save the file in your trash folder when you press 'd' instead of deleting them outright (saving to another folder deletes the message from the current folder). Then setup a folder hook so that pressing 'd' while in the trash folder really deletes. The only real problem with this is that other deleting in ways other than just pressing 'd' won't utilize the trash folder. cedric duval's trash folder patch is useful for this if you're building your own mutt (or if it's already applied to the mutt on your system). http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/ while this (apparently) isn't something that the developers have wanted to add to mutt, it is a frequent request, and cedric's patch is much nicer than using macros. i can understand the 'i mean delete when i say delete' philosophy, but since i like to keep things around for a while but like to keep my mailboxes fairly small, i find trash folders very useful. -- Will Yardley input: william hq . newdream . net .
Re: pgp problems...
jbw -- ...and then jbw said... % % On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:39:56AM -0500, David T-G spewed into the ether: % [clip] ... % You should check the exit code of gpg. If it's nonzero and you haven't % specifically set mutt to recognize good signature text then mutt will % see it as a failure anyway. % % I set pgp_good_sign and now mutt/gpg verifies signatures on % encrypted mime encoded msgs. But it still doesn't allow me to Good. That's a start :-) % decrypt the message. ESC-P doesn't work either.. We'll get to that. ... % What about starting simply: can you send yourself signed, encrypted, and % signed+encrypted messages and read them properly? % % If *you* can read *your* messages, then whose can you not read? Is it % just one person? Put your public key on the servers and we can try % sending you (signed and unsigned) encrypted messages for you to test. % % I can read my messages fine with no problem. My key should be on Good. % the public servers. I uploaded it to wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net a couple % of months ago. We've now taken care of that little wrinkle :-) % Since this is the only person I communicate with using encryption at % the moment I have had no one else to compare it with. They are % using Eudura/Windows with the PGPfreeware 7.0.3 plugin. Well, we can take care of that :-) Watch your mailbox for some test messages. % % Have one of your problematic correspondents send you vanilla test ... % % I have attached one of the problem msgs file testmsg.pgp. Let me know % what you find out. From my [completely amateur] review of the file and comparison with my own tests, it looks as though your correspondent encrypted a file, pasted the encrypted text into a message, and then in-line signed that message which wrapped the signature around the encryption. mutt, AFAIK, isn't expecting two-step handling like that but, instead, a message that is both signed and encrypted in the same step. I think that that is where the problem lies. Take a look at my tests and see if any of them give you the same problem as your pal (I'm going to keep my bet on which it will be silent until the results come out, of course :-) Meanwhile, check with him or her and see how the encryption and signing are done; if some of it involves clipboard pasting, then that's probably the trouble. % % TIA HTH HAND % % jbw :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg29745/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
fcntl: invalid parameter
When I open my IMAP mailbox, I get the following error: fcntl: Paramètre invalide (errno = 22) What happens? -- Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ - 100% validated (X)HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc. Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA
Re: pgp problems...
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:48:13AM -0500, David T-G spewed into the ether: [snip] From my [completely amateur] review of the file and comparison with my own tests, it looks as though your correspondent encrypted a file, pasted the encrypted text into a message, and then in-line signed that message which wrapped the signature around the encryption. mutt, AFAIK, isn't expecting two-step handling like that but, instead, a message that is both signed and encrypted in the same step. I think that that is where the problem lies. Take a look at my tests and see if any of them give you the same problem as your pal (I'm going to keep my bet on which it will be silent until the results come out, of course :-) Meanwhile, check with him or her and see how the encryption and signing are done; if some of it involves clipboard pasting, then that's probably the trouble. % % TIA HTH HAND David, I was able to decrypt read all of the emails you sent except for the signed+pasted-encrypted in-line message. With particular email I received the same results as with their emails. From what you said about the two-step process and based on the software they are using, eudora (win2K)/pgpfreeware 7.0.3 plugin that since pgpfreeware is a plugin and not an integral part of eudora that this is how the plugin handles the encryption and signing of messages with eudora. That would explain why when I send them signed+encrypted email they can only open it what they call a secure viewer which is a seperate window from eudora. The pgpfreeware plugin is expecting a two-step process and my emails are signed+encrypted in one-step. Therefore they can't read my emails directly within eudora. So which method is the standard signing and encrypting in one-step or two-steps? Thanks for your help, jbw :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg29747/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: automatic pgp key import [SOLVED]
Justin R. Miller wrote: Check the upgrade notes to GnuPG 1.0.7. I believe you need: keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve Thanks, works now. Viktor -- Viktor Rosenfeld WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~rosenfel/ msg29748/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: fcntl: invalid parameter
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 17:08:32 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: When I open my IMAP mailbox, I get the following error: fcntl: Paramètre invalide (errno = 22) What happens? I've just had a look with strace. In fact, this is not related to IMAP, but to the postpone mailbox that is read (over NFS). -- Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ - 100% validated (X)HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc. Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA
lbdb query when forwarding mail
lbdb query when forwarding mail === I'm using mutt for a week now and I'm very impressed of all the avaiable configuration options for mutt. It's the best MUA for me. Anyway there are some litte options witch I would enable in order to send my mails faster and easier. I've bounded the external-query function successfully to lbdb, in order to fetch out user addresses when pressing Q. This works only when I'm going to compose new mails, but when I want to forward mails I always get the To: value and am this way only able to check out users from my mutt aliases file. Anyone has some tips to solve my little issue ? Maybe a same mail question was posted before mine but actually I'm only subscribed for a week to this list and I've found nothing usefull in the arcvhives. Thanks for any help, folks ! Have a nice day, - Ivo -- »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« Ivo Marino[EMAIL PROTECTED] UN*X Developer, running Debian GNU/Linux irc.OpenProjects.net #debian http://eimbox.org/~eim http://eimbox.org »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »«
UTF 8 / ACS question
The Mac OS X Terminal does not have much support for anything but vt100, so the mutt threading has to be set to with ascii_chars. In the next release of OS X, 10.2, the terminal has UTF 8 support. I don't know much about this, and the mutt manual says that threading by default uses ACS characters. Are these two related in that the new Terminal will display the mutt threading correctly with ascii_chars set to no? Thanks. -Ken
Re: lbdb query when forwarding mail
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 08:02:07PM +0200, Ivo Marino wrote: I've bounded the external-query function successfully to lbdb, in order to fetch out user addresses when pressing Q. This works only when I'm going to compose new mails, but when I want to forward mails I always get the To: value and am this way only able to check out users from my mutt aliases file. Anyone has some tips to solve my little issue ? You can access the external-query function any time mutt displays a To: or Cc: prompt by typing Ctrl-T. This is discussed in the mutt manual in the External Address Queries section. Gary -- Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Spokane, Washington, USA http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ |
Re: slow imap/getting list of new folders
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 01:04:29AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: well you have to define which mailboxes you want to receive incoming mail; ie: mailboxes ! +labels +admin +cron or something like that (they can be all on one line or split over multiple lines, i believe). to see the list, start mutt with 'mutt -y', or hit change-folder?CR (you can make a macro for this if you want; i was used to PINE so i bound ',' to this). Thanks for the tip. This is close to what I want, but when I run 'mutt -y' I just see all the folders I put next to the mailboxes command and a 0 beside each one, whether or not there are new messages in them. If this is an IMAP problem, as I said before, I don't mind switching to mbox or whatever, but the process is somewhat laborious for me. And assuming the -y list can tell me which folders have new mail, is there a way to do that from inside mutt, or should I just quit and restart? it will almost definitely be faster with local mbox folders. Also, I saw a maildir header caching patch by Michael Elkins - is that relevant to my problem? only if you're using Maildir. helps out a bit (a lot in certain cases). Do you know if mbox or maildir+patch is quicker? With whatever the quickest one is, is it pretty fast to switch between folders with, say, 1 messages? Thanks again for any info. -- Ben Escoto msg29753/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: lbdb query when forwarding mail
Thank you. Next time I'll take a better look at the manual. On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 11:31:18AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 08:02:07PM +0200, Ivo Marino wrote: I've bounded the external-query function successfully to lbdb, in order to fetch out user addresses when pressing Q. This works only when I'm going to compose new mails, but when I want to forward mails I always get the To: value and am this way only able to check out users from my mutt aliases file. Anyone has some tips to solve my little issue ? You can access the external-query function any time mutt displays a To: or Cc: prompt by typing Ctrl-T. This is discussed in the mutt manual in the External Address Queries section. Gary -- Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Spokane, Washington, USA http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ | -- »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« Ivo Marino[EMAIL PROTECTED] UN*X Developer, running Debian GNU/Linux irc.OpenProjects.net #debian http://eimbox.org/~eim http://eimbox.org »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »«
Re: Find Related Mails
* Nelson D. Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-16 06:38]: Is there a way to bind a key that searches all the mdirs/ for related messages? I've been searching up on that and can't find a thing. Has anyone tried it? man mgrep Sven
Re: Find Related Mails
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07-18-02 14:12]: * Nelson D. Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-16 06:38]: Is there a way to bind a key that searches all the mdirs/ for related messages? I've been searching up on that and can't find a thing. Has anyone tried it? man mgrep Also grepm, check: http://www.barsnick.net/sw/grepm.html Another way to the same end. -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org
Re: Mutt and mail list issue
* Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-18 03:52]: I'm on the same list as Dee and am having the same problem. My best guess is that the mailing list software is chocking on the mime headers. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline looks fine. *shrug* The list admin sent me some instructions for Lookout Express that suggested setting the program to send all attachments inline or something similar. well - have you been sending to that list using Lookout Distress? if so then you lose - even when the headers are ok. anyway, you can still send the data inline (inside the body of your message). but i'd soon killfile you if you did. If anyone has any suggestions I'd like to hear them. dont send attachments - send URLs to files instead. then those who want them can get them; and those who don't won't have to. personally, i find that disallowing attachments on mailing lists is fine. i'd even set a 10K maximum on the lists i maintain - if the software allowed it. Sevn
Re: Fwd: Internet.Com Format Error
* Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-15 05:24]: * W. D. McKinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-07-15 07:07]: I have attached the e-mail sent to me from the list saying no go on me sending via Mutt. Hmmm.. wonder whats up ? You may want to post one of the rejected mails. now, if he doesn't then we can all ignore the problem. no info - no help. besides - when has this list become a problem solver for other lists' configurations? Sven [expecting the usual pc comments] -- Note to experienced users: Please don't encourage anti-support behavior. Don't try to answer questions from users who don't provide the necessary information. Guessing what they did is an incredible waste of time. (DJB)
Re: Fcc default to domain name
* Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-15 07:18]: How would I set the default Fcc to the domain name of the recipient, omitting the tld part (.com or whatever). This would also be useful as a default save-hook. fcc-hook @domain +domain no, there's no special for the domain part. no, mutt does not have a scripting language. no, there's no patch ion 1.5.* for this yet. Sven
Re: UTF 8 / ACS question
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 02:16:03PM -0400, Ken Weingold wrote: The Mac OS X Terminal does not have much support for anything but vt100, so the mutt threading has to be set to with ascii_chars. In the next release of OS X, 10.2, the terminal has UTF 8 support. I don't know much about this, and the mutt manual says that threading by default uses ACS characters. Are these two related in that the new Terminal will display the mutt threading correctly with ascii_chars set to no? not really (ACS standards for alternate-character-set - which does not apply to Unicode or UTF-8). It's coincidental - mutt has hardcoded UTF-8 strings for the line-drawing characters that correspond to the vt100 alternate character set. -- Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
Re: search-next annoyance [1.5.1]
* Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-15 19:57]: i'm getting pretty annoyed by the behavior of search-next; this is how i use mutt pretty often, and it doesn't exactly help to make it easier: starting in index: search~b patternenter display-message searchpatternenter exit search-next display-message search-next hmm... at this moment, instead of just jumping to the next match, mutt prompts me for the pattern. huh? that doesn't happen with my mutt 1.4. is there a knob i've overlooked? i'm running 1.5.1i, oh - mutt 1.5.1 maybe that one's different? how come you complain about a *developer* version on the users* list then? you should try discussing this with the developers on mutt-dev... ;-) Sven
Re: search-next annoyance [1.5.1]
Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: * Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-15 19:57]: starting in index: search~b patternenter display-message searchpatternenter exit search-next display-message search-next hmm... at this moment, instead of just jumping to the next match, mutt prompts me for the pattern. huh? that doesn't happen with my mutt 1.4. I see exactly the same behavior as Roman with mutt 1.4 Seven. Hm, are you running any patches Roman? Michael -- Linux poses a real challenge for those with a taste for late-night hacking (and/or conversations with God). (By Matt Welsh) PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
Re: Mail to this list using Mutt
* W. D. McKinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-15 05:43]: Is list maintainer Jim on-line tonight? If, please reply off line. CC'd to the mutt-users list. man irc! Sven
Re: search-next annoyance
Roman Neuhauser wrote: display-message search-next at this moment, instead of just jumping to the next match, mutt prompts me for the pattern. But you are presented the previous value at the prompt, don't you? it's obviously trying to be helpful, but in fact does just the opposite. i just want it to do what i told it, which is search for the next match, not create a new search. macro pager n search-next\n ? -- Cedric
Re: pgp problems...
jbw -- ...and then jbw said... % % On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:48:13AM -0500, David T-G spewed into the ether: % [snip] ... % Take a look at my tests and see if any of them give you the same problem ... % I was able to decrypt read all of the emails you sent except for % the signed+pasted-encrypted in-line message. With particular email I % received the same results as with their emails. Aha! As I thought. % ... % is how the plugin handles the encryption and signing of messages with % eudora. Yeah. % % That would explain why when I send them signed+encrypted email they can % only open it what they call a secure viewer which is a seperate window Ahhh... % from eudora. The pgpfreeware plugin is expecting a two-step process and my % emails are signed+encrypted in one-step. Therefore they can't read my % emails directly within eudora. Yeah. And that explains why their mails are goofy, too. % % So which method is the standard signing and encrypting in one-step or % two-steps? Well, I don't know what one considers standard, but I'd say the mutt way is the Right Way ;-) I've also followed the gnupg list a bit and it seems that a single sign-and-encrypt process is a more common method, though there is some discussion of doing multiple steps for signing and encryption (in fact, s+e+s or e+s+e to get around some security problems inherent in public-key encryption). % % Thanks for your help, Sure thing! % % jbw HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg29765/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Fwd: Internet.Com Format Error
Dee -- ...and then W. D. McKinney said... % % I have attached the e-mail sent to me from the list saying % no go on me sending via Mutt. Did you sign your message? Did you send any high-bit characters that might have been QP-encoded? % % Hmmm.. wonder whats up ? Only they can tell you for sure, though this list will probably end up helping anyway. % % /Dee HTH HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg29766/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
pgp-hooks...
[note: i sent this to my local linux user's group. i'm wondering if anyone here has ideas on this? i've searched around a lot on this and haven't found anything. i use the standard mutt with redhat 7.3 (Mutt 1.2.5.1i (2000-07-28)). if people could cc me that would be great, but i'll also skim the archives thing. but essentially can i use pgp-hooks autoselect pgp keys for specified users with mutt 1.x + gpg? can i do it without a patch? if no to both, would a little perl wrapper to munge the gpg output as i describe below actually work, or will it not work on other keys? thanks!] ok, i just played with pgp-hooks in mutt. as usual when experimenting with pgp and mutt, i've enlisted our test admin paul jakma and our emergency backup test admin, liam bedford[0]. sadly however i never got past paul since there were too many errors (obviously on my side as usual). so this is the command mutt uses to list keys: gpg --no-verbose --batch --with-colons --list-keys %r and this is the pgp-hook i have set: pgp-hook paulj@(itg\.ie|alphyra\.(ie|com)) 26034AA9 mutt asks if it should use key 26034AA9 and then it decides to make me pick the key from the normal list. only after selecting a key that way does it work. this is the sequence of commands: gpg --no-verbose --batch --with-colons --list-keys 26034AA9 gpg --recv-keys [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg --no-verbose --batch --with-colons --list-keys paulj@alphyra Paul Jakma this is what the latter command (which is used to build the list) produces: pub:f:1024:17:D86BF79464A2FF6A:1998-10-21::64:f:Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED]::scESC: uid:fPaul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED]: uid:fPaul Jakma (Home address) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: sub:f:2048:16:625C9FD229C725E9:1998-10-21::64e: sub:f:2048:20:A8A077E4D602BC59:2000-07-04::64esc: sub:f:4096:20:B52EE1206A906D73:2000-07-05::64esc: pub:f:1024:17:E26517E626034AA9:2000-07-04:2004-07-11:72:f:Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED]::scESC: uid:fPaul Jakma (Work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: uid:fPaul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED]: uid:fPaul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED]: uid:fPaul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED]: sub:f:1024:16:777344AD45F7485F:2000-07-04:2004-07-11:72e: sub:f:2048:20:B54868CCB0B88E06:2000-07-05:2004-07-11:72esc: sub:f:4096:20:F960636AB35EAE31:2000-07-26:2004-07-11:72esc: the first set of keys can be dismissed. the annoying thing is that the list is as long as the number of uid lines times the number of pub/sub lines for each key. i changed the list command to spit out various versions of the above. once i did that it selected correctly the first time: pub:f:4096:20:F960636AB35EAE31:2000-07-26:2004-07-11:72:f:Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED]::esc: which merges the pub:f:1024 line with the sub:f:4096 line. now, newer versions of mutt apparently have this solved. is this true? and is anyone using mutt and pgp-hooks just fine? how are your pgp_ commands set? kevin [0] my lame reference to dave barry: http://pottedmeat1.tripod.com/pmfp/id9.html -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to fork()'ed on 37058400the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier meatspace place: home than a sober one. the happiness of credulity is a http://ie.suberic.net/~kevin cheap dangerous quality -- g.b. shaw
copy to maildirs
I have postfix and procmail setup to deliver mail to maildirs. Mutt reads the maildirs just fine. when i want to move a message to another folder, mutt will only copy it to a mbx. I realize that I could add one entry to my .muttrc but I just don't know what that would be. I am a newbie, so you may have to speak slowly. Thanks for your help. Doug
Re: copy to maildirs
* Doug Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-18 22:11]: Hi, I have postfix and procmail setup to deliver mail to maildirs. Mutt reads the maildirs just fine. when i want to move a message to another folder, mutt will only copy it to a mbx. I realize that I could add one entry to my .muttrc but I just don't know what that would be. I am a newbie, so you may have to speak slowly. Thanks for your help. set mbox_type=Maildir this sets the default mailbox to be Maildir, so newly created mailboxes take that type. HTH Michael -- Dr Michael A. Maibaum - (W)+1 (415) 561 1682 /~\ The ASCII [EMAIL PROTECTED]- (H)+1 (415) 626 6733 \ / Ribbon Campaign http://www.gene-hacker.net X Help Cure / \HTML Email msg29769/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
mailboxes w/ human readable file sizes
I'd like to configure my mutt so that when I change mailboxes, it gives me the mailbox sizes in human readable format, like the -h flag in ls, for example. Size in bytes isn't particularly meaningful. Any suggestions? Is this possible in mutt? Jens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
