Re: wrap lines in a marked block of text (nano)
The problem with your using nano is you not being satisfied with it's formatting abilities. So, a different editor or ?? First, thanks for the various remarks, and I'm sorry I was not always clear. The bottom line, however comes here. Nano apparently cannot refill a block of marked text, and that was a formating ability I was hoping it had. Your familiarity with emacs would probably make you happy with some form of: set editor=emacsclient %s Actually, when I first migrated to mutt from RMAIL I used emacsclient, but my unfamiliarity with mutt led to some frustration and when I reinstalled Debian I left it at the default nano. Being unable to refill blocks of text is not a show stopper for me in nano, but since I'm more comfortable with emacs keybindings, I should probably head in that direction. Thanks again, Haines
reply_regexp help to match 'RE :'
Hello, Sometimes I receive mail replies with the RE : original subject string as subject. This RE : is apparently not recognized by the default reply_regexp value, because when I reply to this kind of mail, mutt add another Re: in front of the subject line; furthermore, the threading is broken. Instead of the default, I tried to use the following value, by inserting a space just before the [\[ 0-9\]+], but it still does not work: set reply_regexp=^(re( [\[ 0-9\]+])*|aw):[ \t]* I am not especially good at regexps, so any help would be welcome. Thanks, -- Nicolas
Re: reply_regexp help to match 'RE :'
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 07:29:18PM +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote: Hello, Sometimes I receive mail replies with the RE : original subject string as subject. This RE : is apparently not recognized by the default reply_regexp value, because when I reply to this kind of mail, mutt add another Re: in front of the subject line; furthermore, the threading is broken. My understanding is that threading has nothing to do with the subject line. If it did threads couldn't be hijacked. What am I missing? -- Bob Holtzman GPG key ID = 8D549279 If you think you're getting free lunch check the price of the beer. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: reply_regexp help to match 'RE :'
* Nicolas KOWALSKI n...@petole.demisel.net 21.11.2009 Sometimes I receive mail replies with the RE : original subject string as subject. This RE : is apparently not recognized by the default reply_regexp value, because when I reply to this kind of mail, mutt add another Re: in front of the subject line; furthermore, the threading is broken. Instead of the default, I tried to use the following value, by inserting a space just before the [\[ 0-9\]+], but it still does not work: set reply_regexp=^(re( [\[ 0-9\]+])*|aw):[ \t]* Hello Nicolas, I have this in my muttrc and it works: set reply_regexp=^((re([\[^-][0-9]+\]?)*|aw|antwort|antw|wg):[ \t]*)+ Hth Michael -- Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overal looks like work.-- Thomas A. Edison signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: reply_regexp help to match 'RE :'
Hei hei, My understanding is that threading has nothing to do with the subject line. If it did threads couldn't be hijacked. What am I missing? Maybe the following mail headers: Message-ID, References and In-Reply-To. Greets Alex -- »With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably.« (Jean-Luc Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie) *** GnuPG-FP: 02C8 A590 7FE5 CA5F 3601 D1D5 8FBA 7744 CC87 10D0 *** signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: reply_regexp help to match 'RE :'
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:48:30PM -0700, RobertHoltzman wrote: My understanding is that threading has nothing to do with the subject line. If it did threads couldn't be hijacked. What am I missing? Check out strict_threads in the muttrc manual. -- Monte
Re: reply_regexp help to match 'RE :'
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:14:08PM +0100, Michael Wagner wrote: * Nicolas KOWALSKI n...@petole.demisel.net 21.11.2009 Sometimes I receive mail replies with the RE : original subject string as subject. This RE : is apparently not recognized by the default reply_regexp value, because when I reply to this kind of mail, mutt add another Re: in front of the subject line; furthermore, the threading is broken. Instead of the default, I tried to use the following value, by inserting a space just before the [\[ 0-9\]+], but it still does not work: set reply_regexp=^(re( [\[ 0-9\]+])*|aw):[ \t]* Hello Nicolas, I have this in my muttrc and it works: set reply_regexp=^((re([\[^-][0-9]+\]?)*|aw|antwort|antw|wg):[ \t]*)+ Thanks for your reply. Well, I just tried it (edited my ~/.muttrc and restarted), and it still does not work. :-/ -- Nicolas
