Re: unsubscribe

2017-01-25 Thread Patrick Shanahan 
* Massimo  [01-25-17 17:39]:


i would bet this does not work either.


from the header of your post and every post on this list:
  List-Post: 
  List-Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe
mutt-users"

ps: normally one would expect to unsubscribe in a similar manner to
originally subscribing.
-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  @ptilopteri
http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri
Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2  Registered Linux User #207535  
  
Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo@ http://linuxcounter.net

Re: unsubscribe

2017-01-25 Thread Matthias Apitz 
NO!


-- 
Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, ⌂ http://www.unixarea.de/  ☎ 
+49-176-38902045
"Wo ist der antiimperialistische Schutzwall, wenn man ihn braucht? 
US-Panzertransport durch ex-DDR"
"Where is the anti-imperialistic  wall, if it's needed? Transport of US-tanks 
through the ex-GDR"
https://deutsch.rt.com/kurzclips/45282-us-panzertransporte-durch-ex-ddr/

unsubscribe

2017-01-25 Thread Massimo

Re: Holy Grail (multipart/alternative + HTML + inline images + GPG)

2017-01-25 Thread Michelle Konzack 
On 2017-01-25 07:55:05 Patrice Levesque hacked into the keyboard:
>   - multipart/mixed
>   - multipart/alternative
>   - text/plain
>   - multipart/related
>   - text/html
>   - inline image
>   - attachments

Are you sure, you have closed every part properly?

I do some things similary, BUT I use commandline tools,  to  create  the
multipart/alternative  and  then  I  move  the  complete  file  to   the
~/Maildir/.Drafts/new/ folder, where mutt can find  it  if  I  recall  a
message.

> Any possible way to achieve that “send as is” behaviour, or do you guys
> know any patch in the wild that would allow that?

You can use sendmail or ssmtp to send the file without using mutt.
It is much easier, specially from a script.

-- 
Michelle KonzackITSystems
GNU/Linux Developer 0033-6-61925193


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Holy Grail (multipart/alternative + HTML + inline images + GPG)

2017-01-25 Thread Patrice Levesque 

Hi.

This subject has been discussed many times over the years, and I'm
having a go at it.

Because mutt's native support for multipart/alternative seems
insufficient for what I'm trying to achieve, I'm aiming to get this
flow:

1) Use mutt (write text/plain mail, set mail headers (recipients,
subject, others) and handle file attachments).

2) [Message pushed somewhere, via a mutt macro, that could save
locally in a mailbox, or pipe to a file, or anything: mechanism does
not really matter to me].

3) Message is massaged by a script that rebuilds the MIME sections
of the mail, adding a text/html section (transcoding text/plain via
Markdown or other tool) and adding related HTML inline images (for
signature).  MIME structure becomes:

- multipart/mixed
- multipart/alternative
- text/plain
- multipart/related
- text/html
- inline image
- attachments

4) Message returns to mutt, which handles GPG, archiving to
appropriate Fcc, sending out for transport.

Now my blocker comes from (4).  No matter if I try to `recall-message`
(Shift-R), `resend-message` (Esc-e) or mutt's `-H` option, the
multipart/alternative part gets corrupted by mutt.  I'm trying to tell
mutt “Please just send it as it is”.  `bounce-message` (b) leaves mail
structure intact but of course modifies recipients.

Any possible way to achieve that “send as is” behaviour, or do you guys
know any patch in the wild that would allow that?

Thanks,



-- 
· Patrice Levesque
· http://ptaff.ca/
· mutt.wa...@ptaff.ca
--



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature