Re: Mutt and vim enhancment

2000-10-12 Thread Bevan Broun

on Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 12:39:46PM -0400, Peter Solodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Is it useful for someone besides me? :-)

Im using it. I modified the first one to include the Subject but then
the 2nd one arrived and I started to modify again but decided to wait
for the finished version. There is room  in my title bar for the
subject, what about yours?

BB
-- 
Bevan Broun   ph (08) 9380 1587
Computer Systems Officer fax (08) 9380 1065
Dept. Electrical and Electronic Engineering  
University of Western Australia rm. G70



Re: why is mutt better?

2000-03-09 Thread Bevan Broun

on Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 06:20:07PM -0800, Eugene Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 06:39:45PM +, J McKitrick wrote:
 :
 :I just got in a debate over email clients, and my windows friend
 :argues anything i can do in mutt, he can do in TheBat! just as easily.
 :I checked the feature list, and it is extensive.  Most of what mutt
 :offers, thebat offers.  Why is the advantage of mutt, or any
 :text-based email client?
 
 - uses any editor you want (like any Unix mail client)
 - has extensive hook mechanism (although choice of actions isn't)
 - spawn subshells to do whatever
 - tags messages without moving them to another folder/mailbox

What is thebat like for speed? Mutt is very fast at reading and
sorting large mail folders.

BB
-- 
Bevan Broun   ph (08) 9380 1587
Computer Systems Officer fax (08) 9380 1065
Dept. Electrical and Electronic Engineering  
University of Western Australia rm. G70



Re: checking pop mail in the background

2000-02-29 Thread Bevan Broun

on Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 09:21:51PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Jim Breton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 29 Feb 2000:
  There are a few solutions I can think of and I'm wondering if anyone
  could advise me on which one might be best, or hopefully suggest a
  better one.
 
 First of all, I'd recommend the approach to getting fetchmail.  In the
 daemon mode, it'll automatically fetch email in the background and you
 won't notice anything (except that the line is busy with some traffic...).

Im using a perl program called pop_perl5, which doesnt require
sendmail running on the local machine and has a daemon mode. I make an
ssh tunnel first:

ssh -f -L 1110:popserver:110 localhost 'sleep 7d /dev/null /dev/null'

and then configure pop_perl5 to use localhost:1110 as the pop server.
This keeps my mail arriving all week to my localhard drive.

Then I use rsync to sync my mailboxes to a network share that is
backed up. Im very happy with the speed of mutt with local mail spool
and folders.


BB
-- 
Bevan Broun   ph (08) 9380 1587
Computer Systems Officer fax (08) 9380 1065
Dept. Electrical and Electronic Engineering  
University of Western Australia rm. G70



Re: checking pop mail in the background

2000-02-29 Thread Bevan Broun

on Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 03:18:31AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 fetchmail doesn't require that either (I'm not sure if you were implying
 that it did, or not).  And it can also be configured to use an
 ssh-tunnel for the pop-retrieval.

Yes I did think fetchmail required a local smtp, glad Im wrong. I
might give it another look as it seems to be what most people are
using.

BB
-- 
Bevan Broun   ph (08) 9380 1587
Computer Systems Officer fax (08) 9380 1065
Dept. Electrical and Electronic Engineering  
University of Western Australia rm. G70



Re: Config tool for mutt (Was: Email client poll)

1999-07-21 Thread Bevan Broun

on Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 02:04:44AM +0200, Roberto Suarez Soto [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 On Jul/21/1999, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
 
  Sure, but what's wrong with having an X GUI config tool for producing
  the .muttrc ? If you think it should be purely text based and have some
  ideas on how to do it then that's o.k. too - one doesn't rule out the 
  other.
 
   The perfect solution would be to have both, indeed :-) I think that
 a purely text-based one could be easily done with Dialog+Perl (or sh, but I
 think Perl is better for this task). IMHO, at least.

And someone could wrap it up in a cgi script so a web interface is used
with the config file mailed to the user.

BB
-- 
Bevan Broun   ph (08) 9380 1587
Computer Systems Officer fax (08) 9380 1065
Dept. Electrical and Electronic Engineering  
University of Western Australia rm. G70