Re: deleting duplicated messages
* David Obwaller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-20 13:24 (CEST)] is it possible to automatically delete duplicated messages in mutt? thanks in advance for any help! Sure. Check the list archives. -- Rafael C. Gawenda 2:346/7.549@fidonet Registered LiNUX user #93375 Life's unfair - but root password helps! (BOFH?) msg31916/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Displaying PGP signature *after* the message?
* Stephane Bortzmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-16 14:40 (CEST)]
Is there a way to display the message Good signature from... *after*
the message, not between the headers and the messages? Or to hide it
unless specifically called? (Yes, I've look at the documentation and
in many .muttrc at www.dotfiles.com.)
The attached patch is against the mutt 1.5.1 tar ball available
at the mutt site, and allows what you asked for, setting the
configuration variable pgp_bottom_sig
--
Rafael C. Gawenda
2:346/7.549@fidonet
Registered LiNUX user #93375
You can't assign IP address 127.0.0.1 to the loopback adapter,
because it is a reserved address for loopback devices (Microsoft
Windows XP - P R O F E S S I O N A L)
diff -u mutt-1.5.1-o/PATCHES mutt-1.5.1/PATCHES
--- mutt-1.5.1-o/PATCHESFri Oct 18 10:34:23 2002
+++ mutt-1.5.1/PATCHES Fri Oct 18 10:06:53 2002
@@ -1,0 +1 @@
+patch-1.5.1.rg.pgp_sigatbottom.1
diff -u mutt-1.5.1-o/crypt.c mutt-1.5.1/crypt.c
--- mutt-1.5.1-o/crypt.cTue Mar 26 23:23:11 2002
+++ mutt-1.5.1/crypt.c Fri Oct 18 10:20:51 2002
@@ -724,6 +724,15 @@
return;
}
+#ifdef HAVE_PGP
+ if (option(OPTPGPBOTTOMSIG))
+ {
+ state_attach_puts (_([-- The following data is signed --]\n\n), s);
+ mutt_body_handler (a, s);
+state_attach_puts (_(\n[-- End of signed data --]\n\n), s);
+ }
+#endif
+
if (s-flags M_DISPLAY)
{
@@ -767,6 +776,9 @@
b-badsig = goodsig; /* XXX - WHAT!?!?!? */
/* Now display the signed body */
+#ifdef HAVE_PGP
+ if (!option(OPTPGPBOTTOMSIG))
+#endif
state_attach_puts (_([-- The following data is signed --]\n\n), s);
@@ -775,11 +787,19 @@
else
state_attach_puts (_([-- Warning: Can't find any signatures. --]\n\n), s);
}
-
+
+#ifdef HAVE_PGP
+ if (!option(OPTPGPBOTTOMSIG))
+#endif
mutt_body_handler (a, s);
-
+
+#ifdef HAVE_PGP
+ if (s-flags M_DISPLAY sigcnt !option(OPTPGPBOTTOMSIG))
+state_attach_puts (_(\n[-- End of signed data --]\n), s);
+#else
if (s-flags M_DISPLAY sigcnt)
state_attach_puts (_(\n[-- End of signed data --]\n), s);
+#endif
}
diff -u mutt-1.5.1-o/init.h mutt-1.5.1/init.h
--- mutt-1.5.1-o/init.h Thu Apr 25 15:26:01 2002
+++ mutt-1.5.1/init.h Fri Oct 18 10:25:30 2002
@@ -1502,6 +1502,12 @@
** variable is only used if ``$$mime_forward'' is \fIset\fP and
** ``$$mime_forward_decode'' is \fIunset\fP.
*/
+ { pgp_bottom_sig, DT_BOOL, R_NONE, OPTPGPBOTTOMSIG, 0},
+ /*
+ ** .pp
+ ** When set, the PGP signature report will be at the end of the signed
+ ** message part.
+ */
{ forw_decrypt,DT_SYN, R_NONE, UL forward_decrypt, 0 },
/*
*/
diff -u mutt-1.5.1-o/mutt.h mutt-1.5.1/mutt.h
--- mutt-1.5.1-o/mutt.h Sat Apr 20 10:09:54 2002
+++ mutt-1.5.1/mutt.h Fri Oct 18 10:04:55 2002
@@ -436,6 +436,7 @@
#ifdef HAVE_PGP
OPTPGPIGNORESUB,
OPTPGPLONGIDS,
+ OPTPGPBOTTOMSIG,
#endif
#if 0
OPTPGPENCRYPTSELF,
diff -u mutt-1.5.1-o/pgp.c mutt-1.5.1/pgp.c
--- mutt-1.5.1-o/pgp.c Thu Apr 4 08:49:50 2002
+++ mutt-1.5.1/pgp.cFri Oct 18 10:10:03 2002
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@
safe_fclose (pgperr);
- if (s-flags M_DISPLAY)
+ if (s-flags M_DISPLAY !option(OPTPGPBOTTOMSIG))
{
state_putc ('\n', s);
state_attach_puts (_([-- End of PGP output --]\n\n), s);
msg31889/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: uuencode / mutt / attachments
* John Haviland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-19 00:46 (CEST)] My question is this - can I use uuencode to send an attachment that mutt will see as an attachment without requiring the uudecode. Is there any special reason tu use the 'outdated' uudecode? Why not using the base64, which seems to be supported by every mailer/MUA that supports MIME (by the way, MIME is how things are 'attached', uuencode was widely used before MIME, to insert files into the messages (not attached to them). -- Rafael C. Gawenda 2:346/7.549@fidonet Registered LiNUX user #93375 Computers are useless. They can only give you answers (Pablo Picasso) msg31892/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: send hooks again .. not working
* Toby Coleridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-11 10:54 (CEST)] nope still doesnt work I noticed that I have set from at the top of my muttrc is this causing problems for send hooks? Lookup use_from in the manual. Perhaps you're mixing things up, where you have to choose only one way (my_hdr) -- Rafael C. Gawenda 2:346/7.549@fidonet Registered LiNUX user #93375 Computers are useless. They can only give you answers (Pablo Picasso) msg31841/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Folder specific mailing, smart fcc-save-hooks, question.
* Ryan Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-04 14:47 (13:28:38)] for i in $(ls $1);do\ Now the question: Can I make these all case insensitive? For instance right now things to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] are all treated differently, so with a mail sent to each of these addresses, only the one that matches the folder name including case sensitivity gets put there, the others go into record. Change that line in you scripts with: for i in $(ls $(echo $1 | tr '[A-Z]' '[a-z]')) You can also use some perl magic, if tr isn't available on your system. -- Rafael C. Gawenda 2:346/7.549@fidonet Registered LiNUX user #93375 Computers are useless. They can only give you answers (Pablo Picasso) msg31575/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Mutt, SSH and Urlview - microsoft.public.windowsxp.*
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-05 16:28 (16:35:35)] [...] get lost, of course. thank you for reminding me! Sven [be damned if you do, and damned if you don't] Perhaps you should read http://learn.to/edit_messages/, and the signature section of that faq, written by someone called Sven Guckes, where is noted the existence of a character string commonly used and encouraged to delimit the signatures :) http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/afw/#sigdashes -- Rafael C. Gawenda 2:346/7.549@fidonet Registered LiNUX user #93375 You can't assign IP address 127.0.0.1 to the loopback adapter, because it is a reserved address for loopback devices (Microsoft Windows XP - P R O F E S S I O N A L) msg31586/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Trying to do too much with Mutt? - yes, too much!
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-12 16:43 (08:21:20)] how many filters does one need? The more, the better. Maybe A needs only tipical filters (1, 4, and 8), but perhaps B can get his mail sorted using only filters 2 and 41 ;) Being able to do things do not force you to do so, while being unable to do them, FORCES you to do another little hack for the 'problem of the day' -- Rafael C. Gawenda 2:346/7.549@fidonet Registered LiNUX user #93375 If the brain was so simple that we could understand it, we would be so simple that we could not understand it (Lyall Watson) msg31562/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Local Mail Question
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-03 10:26 (08:42:38)] Then, as soon as I save the message and get back to mutt I see: ... To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... I hope this clarifies the problem a little. How do I suppress this? If I could get mutt to stop appending the @kc.rr.com and the mail still does not come through, then this would be true. Well, use vim capabilities to do this... using the comand id local-account, will return 0 or 1 depending on the existence of local-account. I don't have the time to set it up for you right now, but check vim filetypes and autocmds: augroup MuttMailMessages au! au BufRead mutt*[0-9] source ~/.vimail/IN au BufWrite mutt*p0-9] source ~/.vimail/OUT augroup END (excerpt from my ~/.vimrc) -- Rafael C. Gawenda 2:346/7.549@fidonet Registered LiNUX user #93375 You can't assign IP address 127.0.0.1 to the loopback adapter, because it is a reserved address for loopback devices (Microsoft Windows XP - P R O F E S S I O N A L) msg31514/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: overriding headers - is version info a security hole?
* Peter T. Abplanalp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-29 17:12 (12:38:00)] i fail to see how knowing the version of mutt you are running will give any attacker enough information to hack your box. Hints... take a carefull peek at the mail headers... than you get noy only the MUA, but the first MTA involved, his linux box, usually, with two version numbers. You can now relate them with a concrete linux distro. you know holes from. i also heard/read somewhere that the only secure computer is the one that you have ground into fine silcon dust and scattered in the wind. Rmember that C2 claims MS did about his NT4... tha concrete computer certified, couldn't have floppy drives, CD, network cards, nor any other device that communicates the machine, excepting mouse, keyboard and monitor. -- Rafael C. Gawenda, «ais» Systems Techie GnuPG key: 0x5C4839A5 Registered LiNUX user #93375 You can't assign IP address 127.0.0.1 to the loopback adapter, because it is a reserved address for loopback devices (Microsoft Windows XP - P R O F E S S I O N A L) msg30666/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Syncing problems
Hi folks! I'm using a compresed folder for this list as a local archive... it has about 1.200 selected mails (hint about list content quality), and some weeks ago I started having a problem that annoys me a lot. My procmail moves the list new mails into mail/m.lists/inet-tech/mutt-users and I move them to the archive (usually unread) manually in mutt. Then when I get time to a list session, open the .gz mbox, reading, deleting or archiving, and then the problem comes, but only if the number of unread mails is about 100 or over. When I've done half of the session, and change folder, nothing is synced and I'll have to start over selecting for deletion or archiving, but the compressing to message is displayed. I suppose I'm going to do that work in the procmail non compressed mbox, but then I loose the previous thread messages, so I'm going to need two mutt, with different folders opened. Too much work, isn't it? Another thing is about a bug in quote_regexp (IMHO) I've reported some weeks ago (and didn't hear anything back), and could be noted in this mail signature ;) -- Rafael C. Gawenda, «ais» Systems Techie GnuPG key: 0x5C4839A5 Registered LiNUX user #93375 Incluso la verdad se tambalea si es sometida a un análisis excesivo (Doctrina Bene Gesserit. DUNE) msg30684/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
trying to set sort_browser=reverse-unsort ;)
I don't know why sort_browser=unsorted (as-is) equals sort_browser=reverse-unsorted (shouldn't it read 'si-sa'?). The reverse- prefix does nothing here, and the docs doesn't state that. Moreover, the help scrn at the browser, shows options o and O, but also doesn't help. I know, it's not quite logical to reverse-sort something that isn't previously sorted, but that would give me the exact mailbox order I would want to use. I'll now investigate how to do it, as find doesn't sort, and sort doesn't just reverse-unsort (he! mutt isn't the only one at this). I had to change from (two prgs): mailboxes `find ~/mail -type f|xargs` to (five prgs): mailboxes `find ~/mail -type f|grep -n .|sort -rn|cut -f2 -d:|xargs` -- Rafael C. Gawenda, rgawenda/at/pobox/dot/com 2:348/610@fidonet; GnuPG key: 0x5C4839A5; Registered LiNUX User #93375 Guru, n. A computer owner who can read the manual. msg27260/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP signature verification
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-16 08:32 (CEST)] While that sounds like a good idea in general, I don't think it's the real problem. I get my mail delivered right here and I couldn't verify the sig on this message, Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ironically enough. Signed Mon 15 Apr 2002 22:58:13 CEST w DSA key ID 4065A1DA Verified ok: Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using: This is fetchmail release 5.3.3+NTLM+SDPS+NLS gpg (GnuPG) 1.0.1 Updating... It does check with 1.0.6 also. Time to upgrade fetchmail I think, as this seems quite old ;) -- Rafael C. Gawenda, rgawenda/at/pobox/dot/com 2:348/610@fidonet; GnuPG key: 0x5C4839A5; Registered LiNUX User #93375 If the brain was so simple that we could understand it, we would be so simple that we could not understand it (Lyall Watson) msg27268/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: I've broken something
Quoting David T-G, Thu Apr 11 11:42:32 -0500 2002 (CEST) % rgawenda is UID,GID=3D0 Whoa -- rgawenda is your root user? Sort of it, some Debian packages required 'root' to exist, so I just disabled it's login, and created another account with UID=3D0, but the user account ais is the one I use (even for receiving/sending mail as rgawenda@...). I know, now there are other security measures, but I've got used to do it, as I've to manage some old boxes. OK; that's good. Now what about your spool mailbox, if that's the one about which we're talking? My basic error was 'obfuscation' I think. I was so attonished that I mixed up the facts, and reported wrong things... sync always worked, it was just exiting which didn't sync :) Um, OK. Now I'm confused again. I thought you said that sync didn't work. Maybe you should outline the difficulty for me again... Well, at least I can figure you all laughted a while when you read where my problem was :) -- Rafael C. Gawenda, rgawenda/at/pobox/dot/com 2:348/610@fidonet; GnuPG key: 0x5C4839A5; Registered LiNUX User #93375 ...you could spend *all day* customizing the title bar. Believe me. I speak from experience (Matt Welsh) msg27118/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: I've broken something
Quoting David T-G, Wed Apr 10 14:12:05 -0500 2002 (CEST) Rafael -- BTW, isn't your clock a bit off? Your message said 10:42 +0200 but it certainly doesn't look like that when I peek outside... It is... as you could see I can break many things. I played hard with the mainboard settings, because I've got a SoundBlaster oldie, which wasn't quite happy with the speed of modern systems, so it was detected only rare days (once a week, or so). No help on usenet, only replies like buy a new one, they'r cheap! But that's not my way of learning. -- Rafael C. Gawenda, rgawenda/at/pobox/dot/com 2:348/610@fidonet; GnuPG key: 0x5C4839A5; Registered LiNUX User #93375 If the brain was so simple that we could understand it, we would be so simple that we could not understand it (Lyall Watson) msg27119/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: delete inside pager
Quoting Flavien, Sat Apr 13 16:34:17 +0200 2002 (CEST) Hi, I'd like to be able to delete a message while inside the pager, and then go to the next unread message. What I have set up now is the following : macro pager d 'exitdelete-messageprevious-entrynext-unreaddisplay-message' 'delete and go to next unread' macro pager deletedelete-messagenext-unread Any hint ? I'm using this one, but I don't know if it matches your goal. -- Rafael C. Gawenda, rgawenda/at/pobox/dot/com 2:348/610@fidonet; GnuPG key: 0x5C4839A5; Registered LiNUX User #93375 Guru, n. A computer owner who can read the manual. msg27126/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: I've broken something
Quoting David T-G (Wed Apr 10 14:10:19 CEST 2002) Are you using the stock mutt that you've had all along, or did you just breed a new mutt? In the latter case, whether you chose to use mutt_dotlock or have mutt do the locking itself, does the proper binary have the permissions to do so? The problem showed up after setting a new debian 2.2r5 with separate partitions for /usr /home and /var Show us what Sorry for haven't done that before 0:-) Just made a backup, and installed Debian package for woody (1.3.28i) mutt -v ls -lF `which mutt` `which mutt_dotlock` -v details attached (was that a bad idea?) Previosly: -rwxr-xr-x 1 rgawenda rgawenda 1447035 Apr 10 07:55 /usr/bin/mutt* -rwxr-sr-x 1 rgawenda mail7108 Feb 17 2000 /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock* Current: -rwxr-xr-x 1 rgawenda rgawenda 523660 Mar 19 20:50 /usr/bin/mutt* -rwxr-sr-x 1 rgawenda mail7248 Mar 19 20:50 /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock* rgawenda is UID,GID=0 mail user is: uid=1000(ais) gid=1000(ais) groups=1000(ais) give you. In addition, when you're in mutt, does the top line have a percent in up in the left corner? When you toggle-write (bound by default to '%'), do you get the message that changes will and won't be written, or does the percent sign silently stay up there? I'm using no help line, and bottom status line, which shows no '%' sign visible, unless I hit it one time (which tells me that mode changed to rean-only (ie. hanges will not be written, or so). % msg is still there (instead of being moved to +mbox), and marked as New... % Has somebody seen a similar behaviour? Yes -- when mutt_dotlock can't lock your mailbox. I've just tried (by hand) locking a mbox, and mutt complains and reads it RO, after prompting to remove locks, or RW if I let it remove the locks. If I enter the mbox, read, force a sync ($), and quit, it does update. -- Rafael C. Gawenda, rgawenda/at/pobox/dot/com 2:348/610@fidonet; GnuPG key: 0x5C4839A5; Registered LiNUX User #93375 Life's unfair - but root password helps! (BOFH?) Mutt 1.3.28i (2002-03-13) Copyright (C) 1996-2001 Michael R. Elkins and others. Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'. Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details. System: Linux 2.2.17 (i586) [using ncurses 5.2] Compile options: -DOMAIN -DEBUG -HOMESPOOL +USE_SETGID +USE_DOTLOCK +DL_STANDALONE +USE_FCNTL -USE_FLOCK +USE_POP +USE_IMAP -USE_GSS -USE_SSL +USE_GNUTLS +USE_SASL +HAVE_REGCOMP -USE_GNU_REGEX +HAVE_COLOR +HAVE_START_COLOR +HAVE_TYPEAHEAD +HAVE_BKGDSET +HAVE_CURS_SET +HAVE_META +HAVE_RESIZETERM +HAVE_PGP -BUFFY_SIZE -EXACT_ADDRESS -SUN_ATTACHMENT +ENABLE_NLS -LOCALES_HACK +COMPRESSED +HAVE_WC_FUNCS +HAVE_LANGINFO_CODESET ++HAVE_LANGINFO_YESEXPR +HAVE_ICONV -ICONV_NONTRANS +HAVE_GETSID +HAVE_GETADDRINFO ISPELL=/usr/bin/ispell SENDMAIL=/usr/sbin/sendmail MAILPATH=/var/mail PKGDATADIR=/usr/share/mutt SYSCONFDIR=/etc EXECSHELL=/bin/sh MIXMASTER=mixmaster To contact the developers, please mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. To report a bug, please use the flea(1) utility. patch-1.5.tlr.mx_open_append.2 patch-1.3.27.bse.xtitles.1 patch-1.3.26.appoct.3 patch-1.3.15.sw.pgp-outlook.1 patch-1.3.27.admcd.gnutls.19 Md.use_editor Md.paths_mutt.man Md.muttbug_no_list Md.use_etc_mailname Md.muttbug_warning Md.gpg_status_fd patch-1.3.24.rr.compressed.1 patch-1.3.25.cd.edit_threads.9.1 patch-1.3.23.1.ametzler.pgp_good_sign msg27057/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: I've broken something
Quoting Rafael C. Gawenda, Wed Apr 10 10:25:37 +0200 2002 (CEST) Of course, I've the src package and patches handy, it's not lazyness, but if it is the config, then is where I'm a little lost. FYI: It was (of course) my fault, and it was a simple config mistake... Many thanks to all who have replied, but it were anyway usefull messages, I've learnt some usefull things and hints. bind index ºquit #I've had another 'exit' command here :( bind pager ºexit bind compose º exit bind attach º exit The point was using a single 'escape' key, but as the real esc key is a prefix, I had to choose 'º', which, on spanish layout keybs, is located under Esc, right before '1'. At least I managed to get charsets/iconv/locales running fine (after some minutes of RTFM). Sorry :-) -- Rafael C. Gawenda, rgawenda/at/pobox/dot/com 2:348/610@fidonet; GnuPG key: 0x5C4839A5; Registered LiNUX User #93375 Linux is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches (Steve Ballmer, Microsoft CEO) msg27058/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Mailbox was corrupted
Quoting David T-G (Tue Apr 9 13:05:39 CEST 2002) If you *really* want to send a message to mutt-users and have it happily appear in your compressed folder, have your fcc-save-hook write to '^' after applying Byrial's current_shortcut patch; the message will end up in the temp file, and upon exit mutt will see that and use the close-hook to put the temp file back in place as the real file. [BTW, I bet that even though your message to mutt-users shows up the message to which you're replying never shows up with an 'r', right?] Done that. Thx. You're probably right, there is only one r flag in thæt mailbox, and it's dated just before applying the compressed patch. % I did a backup of the full mail tree. Just in case ;) That's a good idea if you're delivering into that compressed folder. Mmm... It sounds like I'm going to have a mutt-users and a mutt-users.gz in ~/mail/lists/inet-tech/mail, and in another 30 lists, which will break one advantage of the current setup, where I've direct access to the mail-bag of each list, while I'm reading new messages in that list... or perhaps I should forget about that patch grin and look forward to an ext3 filesystem for my mail tree. I was still thinking of a way to make it work my way, but you mention about another problem which I haven't thought of. Locks... I would be in a hurry if procmail receives mail for the list I'm currently reading, but this could be fixed stoping fetchmail as daemon, and running it manually (losing a great feature). -- Rafael C. Gawenda, rgawenda/at/pobox/dot/com 2:348/610@fidonet; GnuPG key: 0x5C4839A5; Registered LiNUX User #93375 The three most dangerous things are a programmer with a hammer, a hardware tech with a software patch and a user with an idea. msg26986/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
I've broken something
Hi there. Don't know if it's my config, or some broken patch, I suppose it's the first option, but when I enter my spool (by just nachine$ muttCR), read a message, and quit, the mailbox doesn't get updated, ie, If I reenter, the msg is still there (instead of being moved to +mbox), and marked as New... Has somebody seen a similar behaviour? Of course, I've the src package and patches handy, it's not lazyness, but if it is the config, then is where I'm a little lost. TIA -- Rafael C. Gawenda, rgawenda/at/pobox/dot/com 2:348/610@fidonet; GnuPG key: 0x5C4839A5; Registered LiNUX User #93375 Try to remove the color-problem by restarting your computer several times (Microsoft-Internet Explorer README.TXT)
Re: I've broken something
Quoting darren chamberlain (Wed Apr 10 14:55:03 CEST 2002) Is the spool directory mounted via NFS? No Are permissions correct on $MAIL? r-x 11 ais ais 1024 Apr 10 10:36 mail Is /var some kind of strange partition type? No, it's on the / fs Are you (accidentally) opening the mailbox readonly (try bouncing on '%' a few times)? Well... I've found something... if I repeat two or three times, then mutt does the way it's supposed to. It's weird! I'll be disconnecting in some minutes, till tomorrow. So I'm taking this box home, to reinstall/compile mutt, and do some checks. Thank you. I'll post problem/solution, if I find something interesting (yes, even if I've put something like 'set MicrosoftHasGoodProgrammers=yes' into the cfg). ;) -- Rafael C. Gawenda, rgawenda/at/pobox/dot/com 2:348/610@fidonet; GnuPG key: 0x5C4839A5; Registered LiNUX User #93375 ...you could spend *all day* customizing the title bar. Believe me. I speak from experience (Matt Welsh)
Mailbox was corrupted
Hi there. I'm using the compressed folders patch/feature, and running this list in such a folder, with fcc-hook, so if I post a message here, it should (and it does) stay here, but when I hit 'send' at the compose menu, I got a mail-sent hint, followed witch a Mailbox was corrupted one, which seems false, I can't see the msg just posted, but when I change to another folder and back to this one, I can see it appended right. I'm using the default open-append-close hooks, and the only thing I don't understand is that error message. I did a backup of the full mail tree. Just in case ;) -- Rafael C. Gawenda, rgawenda/at/pobox/dot/com 2:348/610@fidonet; GnuPG key: 0x5C4839A5; Registered LiNUX User #93375 There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home (Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corp., 1977) msg26939/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
non ASCII
I've got an strange problem which keeps my from executing rm -rf /xtrn/c/windows as would be desired. I've spent a couple of days looking for info and support elsewere, so, please, excuse me if you're tired of the same lame question/problem. Let's give some info on it: I thing my locale settings are right, but I've tried many different combos. I'm currently using iso01-f16 font, and LC_CTYPE=es_ES.iso-8859-1, bitchx, mc, lynx and other apps are doing right with my setup, but Mutt doesn't, or at least, it doesn't as it (IMHO) should. I can't see the non-ascii chars in messages, they're displayed as ? in the message pager, but they show nicely if I 'view' the message body through the attach menu. Extra (perhaps usefull) info: Debian 2.2, glibc 2.2.4 -- ais, ais/at/pobox/dot/com Netizen since 1.991 Registered Linux User #93375 - - - 2:348/610@fidonet GnuPG key: 1024D/5C4839A5 2002-02-07 at keyservers There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home (Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corp., 1977)
