Re: GPG and MIME
* Matt Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-04-17 20:31 +0200: On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 11:35:30PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 05:25:12PM +0200, Andre Berger typed: Some people using worse MUAs have complained about my gpg signature. KMail, for example, doesn't recognize the MIME type Mutt produces. They asked for an attachment-description of the signature. Does anybody know how to set things up? If you want to compensate for broken clients, clearsign your mail (include the sig in the body of your mail) instead of using s/mime. A client is not broken if it doesn't implement s/mime. It seems reasonable to use a description for the signature attachment so it doesn't show up as a random unnamed attachment in such mailers. OK, but do you know how to actually add the descricption? PS: There was some trouble getting my public key from keyservers. This seems to have been solved by 'set pgp_sign_as="0x07182FBC"', in other words, prepending my keyID with "0x" to indicate it's a hexadecimal value. The mutt manual gave a hint on this but IMHO could be clearer in this respect. Andre Berger[[EMAIL PROTECTED]] PGP signature
GPG and MIME
Some people using worse MUAs have complained about my gpg signature. KMail, for example, doesn't recognize the MIME type Mutt produces. They asked for an attachment-description of the signature. Does anybody know how to set things up? Andre Berger[[EMAIL PROTECTED]] PGP signature
Re: GPG and MIME
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 05:25:12PM +0200, Andre Berger typed: Some people using worse MUAs have complained about my gpg signature. KMail, for example, doesn't recognize the MIME type Mutt produces. They asked for an attachment-description of the signature. Does anybody know how to set things up? If you want to compensate for broken clients, clearsign your mail (include the sig in the body of your mail) instead of using s/mime. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin
Re: GPG and MIME
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 11:35:30PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 05:25:12PM +0200, Andre Berger typed: Some people using worse MUAs have complained about my gpg signature. KMail, for example, doesn't recognize the MIME type Mutt produces. They asked for an attachment-description of the signature. Does anybody know how to set things up? If you want to compensate for broken clients, clearsign your mail (include the sig in the body of your mail) instead of using s/mime. A client is not broken if it doesn't implement s/mime. It seems reasonable to use a description for the signature attachment so it doesn't show up as a random unnamed attachment in such mailers.
