Re: imap issues - color of indicator
* dan top-posting jerk radom [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-11 09:57]: hmm... does this happen on all terminals? even on the console? The terminal apps that I've tested with are xterm and Eterm. The terminal types I've tested with are xterm, xterm-color, screen-w, linux (console) and vt100. With vt100 I do not see this problem. duh. vt100 does not specify color by definition, so color won't be used. With all other term types mentioned I do see it. why did you try screen-w? do you happen to use screen in between? and if so - which version and what kind of setup? This same client also reads local mbox files, and I don't have this problem with the local files. well, then please write *full* report and send it off as a bug report using flea. see page in sig for more info. ps: and stop top-posting, dammit! Sven -- Sven Guckes[EMAIL PROTECTED] MUTT BUGS http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/bugs.php3 how to report a bug: minimal info, patchesdiffs, where to send. http://bugs.guug.de/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=12345
Re: imap issues - color of indicator
The terminal apps that I've tested with are xterm and Eterm. The terminal types I've tested with are xterm , xterm-color, screen-w, linux (console) and vt100. With vt100 I do not see this problem. WIth all other term types mentioned I do see it. This same client also reads local mbox files, and I don't have this problem with the local files. Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: hmm... does this happen on all terminals? even on the console?
Re: imap issues - color of indicator
this only happens with imap (image at http://radom.org/mutt-imap.png). you'll notice the stuff that's normally highlighted is at the very bottom of the image. here's my color config... color indicator white red dan * Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: * dan radom [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-09 21:27]: Mutt 1.4i (2002-05-29), Linux 2.4.19 (i686) [using ncurses 5.2] in the process of playing with imap i noticed something strange. when opening any mailbox, the current highlighted message appears to have the same text, foreground and background colors. in other words it appears as a solid red bar, where it should have white text. this happens on imap folders only? and why is there color when mutt's default is to show no color at all? so what is your color configuration? does the same happen with mutt linked to slang (1.4.6 now)? this following works fine for me: color indicator white red perhaps your setup is using some default color there? if i move to another message sometimes the solid red bar will remain on that first message, and the newly selected message also appears hihglighted, but displays as it it should. has anyone seen this before? no. then again, i don't use imap. ;-) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] please - don't CC yourself - especially when sending to a mailing list. some people never get it right with group-reply vs list-reply... use Bcc: self - or set copy along with set record=!. Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] so you're another one of those who are not subscribed to this list? Sven -- Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] S-Lang 1.4.6 [2002-10-07] ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/unix/misc/slang/v1.4/ used eg by these programs: SLANG 605347 Oct 7 20:37 slang-1.4.6.tar.bz2 jed (editor), most (pager), SLANG 772503 Oct 7 20:37 slang-1.4.6.tar.gz mutt (mailer), slrn (newsreader).
Re: imap issues - color of indicator
* dan radom [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-10 08:20]: this only happens with imap (image at http://radom.org/mutt-imap.png). you'll notice the stuff that's normally highlighted is at the very bottom of the image. here's my color config... color indicator white red hmm... does this happen on all terminals? even on the console? [50+ lines deleted] c'mon - please don't be so lazy as to delete the quoted text if you do not refer to it at all. just type dG to delete it! Sven
Re: imap issues - color of indicator
* dan radom [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-09 21:27]: Mutt 1.4i (2002-05-29), Linux 2.4.19 (i686) [using ncurses 5.2] in the process of playing with imap i noticed something strange. when opening any mailbox, the current highlighted message appears to have the same text, foreground and background colors. in other words it appears as a solid red bar, where it should have white text. this happens on imap folders only? and why is there color when mutt's default is to show no color at all? so what is your color configuration? does the same happen with mutt linked to slang (1.4.6 now)? this following works fine for me: color indicator white red perhaps your setup is using some default color there? if i move to another message sometimes the solid red bar will remain on that first message, and the newly selected message also appears hihglighted, but displays as it it should. has anyone seen this before? no. then again, i don't use imap. ;-) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] please - don't CC yourself - especially when sending to a mailing list. some people never get it right with group-reply vs list-reply... use Bcc: self - or set copy along with set record=!. Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] so you're another one of those who are not subscribed to this list? Sven -- Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] S-Lang 1.4.6 [2002-10-07] ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/unix/misc/slang/v1.4/ used eg by these programs: SLANG 605347 Oct 7 20:37 slang-1.4.6.tar.bz2 jed (editor), most (pager), SLANG 772503 Oct 7 20:37 slang-1.4.6.tar.gz mutt (mailer), slrn (newsreader).
